Pub Date : 2025-12-19DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2025.12.006
Arthur Peyrottes, Charles Dariane, Laurent Brureau, Stéphane Lorin, Gilles Pasticier, Stéphane de Vergie, Thomas Bommelaere, Aude De Fourmestraux, Eric Potiron, Martin Sie, Olivier Skowron, Naoufel Miaadi, Nam-Son Vuong, Jean-Baptiste Beauval, Morgan Rouprêt, Antoine Faix, Yann Neuzillet, Alexandre de la Taille, Gaelle Fiard, Guillaume Ploussard
Background and objective: Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) is widely used for localised prostate cancer (PC). As surgical techniques and oncological outcomes have matured, attention has increasingly turned to patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and experience measures (PREMs), driven not only by interest in functional recovery but also by broader health care trends, including shared decision-making, patient empowerment, and value-based care models. Digital health platforms may facilitate this evolution, yet real-world evidence on their feasibility and impact is limited. Our objective was to assess the acceptability, feasibility, and clinical relevance of digital telemonitoring using a certified mobile health application after RARP.
Methods: We conducted a prospective, multicentre cohort study involving 465 patients undergoing RARP across 32 French centres. All used the Betty digital health platform for perioperative monitoring. The primary outcome was patient-reported satisfaction with perioperative care. Secondary outcomes were pain trajectories, analgesic use, urinary continence, erectile function, and correlations between satisfaction and recovery endpoints. PROM data were collected preoperatively and up to 6 mo postoperatively.
Key findings and limitations: The questionnaire completion rate at 6 wk was 86%. Satisfaction was high (median score 9-10), and pain and analgesic use declined steadily over 30 d. The pad-free rate was 59% at 6 wk and 78% at 6 mo. International Index of Erectile Function-5 scores remained low (median 3, interquartile range 1-5 at 6 mo). Satisfaction was correlated with lower pain at postoperative day 7 (r = -0.391, p = 0.001), lower incontinence scores (r = -0.324, p = 0.009), and less impact of incontinence (r = -0.420, p = 0.002). The main limitations are the inclusion of only app users and the absence of nerve-sparing data.
Conclusions and clinical implications: Certified digital telemonitoring after RARP is feasible, well accepted, and linked to high satisfaction. Early pain and continence recovery influence the patient experience. These results support the integration of structured PROM/PREM tracking into standard pathways for real-time monitoring and patient-centred care.
背景与目的:机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术(RARP)广泛应用于局部前列腺癌(PC)的治疗。随着手术技术和肿瘤结果的成熟,人们越来越关注患者报告的结果测量(PROMs)和经验测量(PREMs),这不仅受到对功能恢复的兴趣的驱动,而且受到更广泛的医疗保健趋势的驱动,包括共同决策、患者授权和基于价值的护理模式。数字医疗平台可能会促进这一演变,但关于其可行性和影响的现实证据有限。我们的目的是评估RARP后使用经过认证的移动健康应用程序进行数字远程监测的可接受性、可行性和临床相关性。方法:我们进行了一项前瞻性、多中心队列研究,涉及法国32个中心的465名接受RARP治疗的患者。所有患者均使用Betty数字健康平台进行围手术期监测。主要结果是患者报告的围手术期护理满意度。次要结局是疼痛轨迹、镇痛药使用、尿失禁、勃起功能以及满意度和恢复终点之间的相关性。术前和术后6个月收集PROM数据。主要发现和局限性:6周时问卷完成率为86%。满意度很高(中位数为9-10),疼痛和镇痛药的使用在30天内稳步下降。6周时无垫率为59%,6个月时为78%。国际勃起功能指数-5评分仍然很低(中位数为3,6个月时四分位数范围为1-5)。满意度与术后第7天疼痛减轻(r = -0.391, p = 0.001)、尿失禁评分降低(r = -0.324, p = 0.009)、尿失禁影响降低(r = -0.420, p = 0.002)相关。主要的限制是仅包含应用程序用户和缺乏神经保护数据。结论和临床意义:RARP后认证数字远程监护是可行的,被广泛接受,并与高满意度相关。早期疼痛和失禁恢复影响患者的体验。这些结果支持将结构化PROM/PREM跟踪整合到实时监测和以患者为中心的护理的标准路径中。
{"title":"Digital Systematic Collection of Data for Patient-reported Outcome and Experience Measures Reveals Real-world Recovery Trajectories After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy.","authors":"Arthur Peyrottes, Charles Dariane, Laurent Brureau, Stéphane Lorin, Gilles Pasticier, Stéphane de Vergie, Thomas Bommelaere, Aude De Fourmestraux, Eric Potiron, Martin Sie, Olivier Skowron, Naoufel Miaadi, Nam-Son Vuong, Jean-Baptiste Beauval, Morgan Rouprêt, Antoine Faix, Yann Neuzillet, Alexandre de la Taille, Gaelle Fiard, Guillaume Ploussard","doi":"10.1016/j.euf.2025.12.006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2025.12.006","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) is widely used for localised prostate cancer (PC). As surgical techniques and oncological outcomes have matured, attention has increasingly turned to patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and experience measures (PREMs), driven not only by interest in functional recovery but also by broader health care trends, including shared decision-making, patient empowerment, and value-based care models. Digital health platforms may facilitate this evolution, yet real-world evidence on their feasibility and impact is limited. Our objective was to assess the acceptability, feasibility, and clinical relevance of digital telemonitoring using a certified mobile health application after RARP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective, multicentre cohort study involving 465 patients undergoing RARP across 32 French centres. All used the Betty digital health platform for perioperative monitoring. The primary outcome was patient-reported satisfaction with perioperative care. Secondary outcomes were pain trajectories, analgesic use, urinary continence, erectile function, and correlations between satisfaction and recovery endpoints. PROM data were collected preoperatively and up to 6 mo postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>The questionnaire completion rate at 6 wk was 86%. Satisfaction was high (median score 9-10), and pain and analgesic use declined steadily over 30 d. The pad-free rate was 59% at 6 wk and 78% at 6 mo. International Index of Erectile Function-5 scores remained low (median 3, interquartile range 1-5 at 6 mo). Satisfaction was correlated with lower pain at postoperative day 7 (r = -0.391, p = 0.001), lower incontinence scores (r = -0.324, p = 0.009), and less impact of incontinence (r = -0.420, p = 0.002). The main limitations are the inclusion of only app users and the absence of nerve-sparing data.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implications: </strong>Certified digital telemonitoring after RARP is feasible, well accepted, and linked to high satisfaction. Early pain and continence recovery influence the patient experience. These results support the integration of structured PROM/PREM tracking into standard pathways for real-time monitoring and patient-centred care.</p>","PeriodicalId":12160,"journal":{"name":"European urology focus","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145800054","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-18DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2025.12.010
Keiichiro Miyajima, Akihiro Matsukawa, Takafumi Yanagisawa, Marcin Miszczyk, Navid Roessler, Shota Inoue, Shingo Nishimura, Abdulrahman S Alqahtani, Ahmed R Alfarhan, Fumihiko Urabe, Keiichiro Mori, Pierre I Karakiewicz, Leonardo Oliveira Reis, Takahiro Kimura, Shahrokh F Shariat
Background and objective: Trimodal therapy (TMT)-comprising transurethral resection of the bladder tumor, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy-offers a bladder-preserving alternative to radical cystectomy for selected patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). However, the optimal criteria for patient selection and prognostication remain inadequately defined. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to optimize the selection of MIBC patients who are likely to have better survival outcomes from TMT.
Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science in February 2025. Eligible studies examined prognostic factors for overall or cancer-specific survival in patients with MIBC undergoing TMT. To reduce the impact of confounding, only multivariable-adjusted estimates were included in the meta-analysis. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated using a random-effect model. The risk of bias was evaluated using the Quality In Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool (CRD42025641514).
Key findings and limitations: A total of 31 studies, including 9416 patients treated with TMT for MIBC, met the inclusion criteria. Older age (per year increase; HR: 1.03, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01-1.05), poor performance status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ≥2 vs 0-1; HR: 2.47, 95% CI: 1.78-3.43), impaired renal function (HR: 1.47, 95% CI: 1.12-1.92), presence of hydronephrosis (HR: 1.65, 95% CI: 1.17-2.34), advanced T stage (HR: 1.47, 95% CI: 1.23-1.77), nodal involvement (HR: 1.90, 95% CI: 1.10-3.30), and concomitant carcinoma in situ (HR: 1.81, 95% CI: 1.02-3.20) were independently associated with worse overall survival. Limitations included heterogeneity in treatment protocols and potential residual confounding across studies.
Conclusions and clinical implications: Specific patient- and tumor-related factors are significantly associated with prognosis in patients undergoing TMT for MIBC. These findings may aid in refining patient selection and risk stratification for TMT-based bladder-preserving approaches.
背景和目的:三模式治疗(TMT)-包括经尿道膀胱肿瘤切除术,化疗和放疗-为选定的肌肉浸润性膀胱癌(MIBC)患者提供了一种膀胱保留替代根治性膀胱切除术。然而,患者选择和预后的最佳标准仍然没有充分定义。进行了一项系统回顾和荟萃分析,以优化选择可能从TMT中获得更好生存结果的MIBC患者。方法:系统检索MEDLINE、Embase和Web of Science于2025年2月出版的文献。符合条件的研究检查了接受TMT的MIBC患者总体或癌症特异性生存的预后因素。为了减少混杂的影响,荟萃分析中只包括了多变量调整后的估计。采用随机效应模型计算合并风险比(hr)。使用预后质量研究(QUIPS)工具(CRD42025641514)评估偏倚风险。主要发现和局限性:共有31项研究,包括9416例接受TMT治疗的MIBC患者,符合纳入标准。年龄较大(每年增加;HR: 1.03, 95%可信区间[CI]: 1.01-1.05),工作状态较差(东部肿瘤合作组≥2 vs 0-1;风险比:2.47,95% CI: 1.78-3.43)、肾功能受损(风险比:1.47,95% CI: 1.12-1.92)、肾积水(风险比:1.65,95% CI: 1.17-2.34)、晚期T期(风险比:1.47,95% CI: 1.23-1.77)、淋巴结受累(风险比:1.90,95% CI: 1.10-3.30)和合并原位癌(风险比:1.81,95% CI: 1.02-3.20)与较差的总生存期独立相关。局限性包括治疗方案的异质性和研究间潜在的残留混淆。结论和临床意义:特定的患者和肿瘤相关因素与接受TMT治疗的MIBC患者的预后显著相关。这些发现可能有助于改进基于tmt的膀胱保留方法的患者选择和风险分层。
{"title":"Prognostic Factors of Trimodal Therapy for Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Keiichiro Miyajima, Akihiro Matsukawa, Takafumi Yanagisawa, Marcin Miszczyk, Navid Roessler, Shota Inoue, Shingo Nishimura, Abdulrahman S Alqahtani, Ahmed R Alfarhan, Fumihiko Urabe, Keiichiro Mori, Pierre I Karakiewicz, Leonardo Oliveira Reis, Takahiro Kimura, Shahrokh F Shariat","doi":"10.1016/j.euf.2025.12.010","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2025.12.010","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Trimodal therapy (TMT)-comprising transurethral resection of the bladder tumor, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy-offers a bladder-preserving alternative to radical cystectomy for selected patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). However, the optimal criteria for patient selection and prognostication remain inadequately defined. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to optimize the selection of MIBC patients who are likely to have better survival outcomes from TMT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science in February 2025. Eligible studies examined prognostic factors for overall or cancer-specific survival in patients with MIBC undergoing TMT. To reduce the impact of confounding, only multivariable-adjusted estimates were included in the meta-analysis. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated using a random-effect model. The risk of bias was evaluated using the Quality In Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool (CRD42025641514).</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>A total of 31 studies, including 9416 patients treated with TMT for MIBC, met the inclusion criteria. Older age (per year increase; HR: 1.03, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01-1.05), poor performance status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ≥2 vs 0-1; HR: 2.47, 95% CI: 1.78-3.43), impaired renal function (HR: 1.47, 95% CI: 1.12-1.92), presence of hydronephrosis (HR: 1.65, 95% CI: 1.17-2.34), advanced T stage (HR: 1.47, 95% CI: 1.23-1.77), nodal involvement (HR: 1.90, 95% CI: 1.10-3.30), and concomitant carcinoma in situ (HR: 1.81, 95% CI: 1.02-3.20) were independently associated with worse overall survival. Limitations included heterogeneity in treatment protocols and potential residual confounding across studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implications: </strong>Specific patient- and tumor-related factors are significantly associated with prognosis in patients undergoing TMT for MIBC. These findings may aid in refining patient selection and risk stratification for TMT-based bladder-preserving approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":12160,"journal":{"name":"European urology focus","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145793776","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-17DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2025.12.007
Navid Roessler, Marcin Miszczyk, Keiichiro Miyajima, Alessandro Dematteis, Ahmed R Alfarhan, Angelo Cormio, Abdulrahman S Alqahtani, Tamás Fazekas, Victor M Schuettfort, Malte W Vetterlein, Yipeng Hu, Veeru Kasivisvanathan, Constantinos Zamboglou, Michael S Leapman, Margit Fisch, Markus Eckstein, Mahul B Amin, Giovanni Enrico Cacciamani, Liang Cheng, Pierre I Karakiewicz, Pawel Rajwa, Shahrokh F Shariat
Background and objective: Digital pathology-based artificial intelligence (DP-AI) biomarkers are emerging as transformative tools to guide clinical management of patients affected by various malignancies. We aimed to synthesise current evidence regarding their prognostic and predictive utility in urologic cancers.
Methods: In this prospectively registered systematic review (PROSPERO: CRD420251036536), we searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science in April 2025 for studies evaluating the prognostic and predictive values of DP-AI models in patients with prostate (PCa), bladder (BCa), renal cell (RCC), testicular (TCa), or penile (PeCa) cancer. The risk of bias was assessed using the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool. Results were tabulated and summarised qualitatively.
Key findings and limitations: Of the 1537 screened individual records, we included 31 studies validating DP-AI models in 21 155 patients. Nineteen studies were conducted in PCa (n = 17 541), six in BCa (n = 2349), five in RCC (n = 1176), and one in TCa (n = 89) patients. Ten PCa studies (n = 8951) utilised the ArteraAI model, including two (n = 2786) showing that it allows identification of patients treated with radiotherapy for clinically localised PCa that can safely omit short-term (subdistribution hazard ratio [sHR] 0.34; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.19-0.63) or long-term (sHR 0.55; 95% CI: 0.41-0.73) androgen deprivation therapy. Two studies (n = 894) developed and validated a model allowing identification of patients with non-muscle-invasive BCa poorly responding to Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (HR 2.3; 95% CI: 1.9-2.8), including one study (n = 253) validating a predictive biomarker for patients who may benefit from upfront gemcitabine/docetaxel. Many DP-AI models showed a prognostic association in localised PCa (n = 16 863), metastatic PCa (n = 678), non-muscle-invasive BCa (n = 2069), muscle-invasive BCa (n = 280), localised RCC (n = 1176), and germline TCa (n = 89) settings. None of the included studies assessed DP-AI models prospectively.
Conclusions and clinical implications: DP-AI biomarkers hold promise to improve treatment personalisation through integration into clinical practice. Prospective validation is now required.
{"title":"Harnessing Artificial Intelligence for Risk Stratification and Outcome Prediction in Urologic Cancers: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Navid Roessler, Marcin Miszczyk, Keiichiro Miyajima, Alessandro Dematteis, Ahmed R Alfarhan, Angelo Cormio, Abdulrahman S Alqahtani, Tamás Fazekas, Victor M Schuettfort, Malte W Vetterlein, Yipeng Hu, Veeru Kasivisvanathan, Constantinos Zamboglou, Michael S Leapman, Margit Fisch, Markus Eckstein, Mahul B Amin, Giovanni Enrico Cacciamani, Liang Cheng, Pierre I Karakiewicz, Pawel Rajwa, Shahrokh F Shariat","doi":"10.1016/j.euf.2025.12.007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2025.12.007","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Digital pathology-based artificial intelligence (DP-AI) biomarkers are emerging as transformative tools to guide clinical management of patients affected by various malignancies. We aimed to synthesise current evidence regarding their prognostic and predictive utility in urologic cancers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospectively registered systematic review (PROSPERO: CRD420251036536), we searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science in April 2025 for studies evaluating the prognostic and predictive values of DP-AI models in patients with prostate (PCa), bladder (BCa), renal cell (RCC), testicular (TCa), or penile (PeCa) cancer. The risk of bias was assessed using the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool. Results were tabulated and summarised qualitatively.</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>Of the 1537 screened individual records, we included 31 studies validating DP-AI models in 21 155 patients. Nineteen studies were conducted in PCa (n = 17 541), six in BCa (n = 2349), five in RCC (n = 1176), and one in TCa (n = 89) patients. Ten PCa studies (n = 8951) utilised the ArteraAI model, including two (n = 2786) showing that it allows identification of patients treated with radiotherapy for clinically localised PCa that can safely omit short-term (subdistribution hazard ratio [sHR] 0.34; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.19-0.63) or long-term (sHR 0.55; 95% CI: 0.41-0.73) androgen deprivation therapy. Two studies (n = 894) developed and validated a model allowing identification of patients with non-muscle-invasive BCa poorly responding to Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (HR 2.3; 95% CI: 1.9-2.8), including one study (n = 253) validating a predictive biomarker for patients who may benefit from upfront gemcitabine/docetaxel. Many DP-AI models showed a prognostic association in localised PCa (n = 16 863), metastatic PCa (n = 678), non-muscle-invasive BCa (n = 2069), muscle-invasive BCa (n = 280), localised RCC (n = 1176), and germline TCa (n = 89) settings. None of the included studies assessed DP-AI models prospectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implications: </strong>DP-AI biomarkers hold promise to improve treatment personalisation through integration into clinical practice. Prospective validation is now required.</p>","PeriodicalId":12160,"journal":{"name":"European urology focus","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145780674","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-17DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2025.12.009
Luca Afferi, Andrea Gallioli, Angelo Territo, Milla Ortved, Julia Abildgaard Dagnæs-Hansen, Lorenzo Masieri, Alessio Pecoraro, Begonya Etcheverry, Donato Cannoletta, Joris Vangeneugden, Liesbeth Desender, Jeremy Mercier, Thomas Prudhomme, Natalia Ortiz Benitez, Giovanni Fontana, Rodrigo García-Baquero, Malene Rohrsted, Joan Palou, Francesc Vigués, Nicolas Doumerc, Riccardo Campi, Sergio Serni, Karel Decaestecker, Andreas Røder, Alberto Breda
Background and objective: Evidence comparing robot-assisted kidney transplantation (RAKT) with open kidney transplantation (OKT) from living donors in patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) remains limited. We aimed to determine whether RAKT, compared with OKT, results in improved renal function at 1 mo after transplantation and whether it is associated with reduced perioperative complication rates and improved long-term outcomes, including dialysis-free, graft, reintervention-free, and overall survival.
Methods: This is a multicenter retrospective study including patients with ESKD who received RAKT or OKT between June 2015 and December 2023 in seven European academic centers. Missing values of relevant baseline characteristics were estimated through multiple imputation of chained equations. Baseline patients' heterogeneity for age, sex, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, Charlson comorbidity index, and preemptive status was balanced using 1:1 nearest neighbor propensity score matching, estimated using logistic regression without replacement. Uni- and multivariable logistic and Cox regression analyses for early postoperative complications and need for reintervention during follow-up, respectively, were performed based on clinical characteristics. Kaplan-Meier estimates and log-rank test were used to compare dialysis-free, graft, reintervention-free, and overall survival according to the surgical approach.
Key findings and limitations: Overall, 733 patients were included. After propensity score matching, two cohorts of 306 patients each with similar baseline characteristics were obtained. The site of transplantation was the right iliac fossa in 240 (78%) and 204 (67%) patients undergoing OKT and RAKT, respectively. RAKT was associated with reduced total vascular anastomosis time (38 vs 32 min, p < 0.001), whereas OKT was associated with reduced surgical time (165 vs 209 min, p < 0.001) and rewarming time (38 vs 45 min, p < 0.001). Overall, early (<30 d) and Clavien-Dindo ≥3 postoperative complication rates were lower in the RAKT group (42% vs 29%, 37% vs 21%, and 12.7% vs 5%; p < 0.001). In the multivariable regression analysis, RAKT was predictive of a lower risk of both early postoperative complications (odds ratio 0.43, interquartile range [IQR]: 0.29-0.62, p < 0.001) and reintervention (hazard ratio 0.38, IQR: 0.22-0.66, p < 0.001), which was confirmed with the Kaplan-Meier estimates.
Conclusions and clinical implications: In experienced centers and appropriately selected recipients, RAKT from a living donor can be adopted to reduce perioperative morbidity and reinterventions without compromising early renal function or long-term patient and graft survival. Further studies should define which subgroups benefit most from RAKT, and evaluate patient-reported outcomes and cost effectiveness.
{"title":"Robot-assisted Versus Open Kidney Transplantation from Living Donor.","authors":"Luca Afferi, Andrea Gallioli, Angelo Territo, Milla Ortved, Julia Abildgaard Dagnæs-Hansen, Lorenzo Masieri, Alessio Pecoraro, Begonya Etcheverry, Donato Cannoletta, Joris Vangeneugden, Liesbeth Desender, Jeremy Mercier, Thomas Prudhomme, Natalia Ortiz Benitez, Giovanni Fontana, Rodrigo García-Baquero, Malene Rohrsted, Joan Palou, Francesc Vigués, Nicolas Doumerc, Riccardo Campi, Sergio Serni, Karel Decaestecker, Andreas Røder, Alberto Breda","doi":"10.1016/j.euf.2025.12.009","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2025.12.009","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Evidence comparing robot-assisted kidney transplantation (RAKT) with open kidney transplantation (OKT) from living donors in patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) remains limited. We aimed to determine whether RAKT, compared with OKT, results in improved renal function at 1 mo after transplantation and whether it is associated with reduced perioperative complication rates and improved long-term outcomes, including dialysis-free, graft, reintervention-free, and overall survival.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a multicenter retrospective study including patients with ESKD who received RAKT or OKT between June 2015 and December 2023 in seven European academic centers. Missing values of relevant baseline characteristics were estimated through multiple imputation of chained equations. Baseline patients' heterogeneity for age, sex, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, Charlson comorbidity index, and preemptive status was balanced using 1:1 nearest neighbor propensity score matching, estimated using logistic regression without replacement. Uni- and multivariable logistic and Cox regression analyses for early postoperative complications and need for reintervention during follow-up, respectively, were performed based on clinical characteristics. Kaplan-Meier estimates and log-rank test were used to compare dialysis-free, graft, reintervention-free, and overall survival according to the surgical approach.</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>Overall, 733 patients were included. After propensity score matching, two cohorts of 306 patients each with similar baseline characteristics were obtained. The site of transplantation was the right iliac fossa in 240 (78%) and 204 (67%) patients undergoing OKT and RAKT, respectively. RAKT was associated with reduced total vascular anastomosis time (38 vs 32 min, p < 0.001), whereas OKT was associated with reduced surgical time (165 vs 209 min, p < 0.001) and rewarming time (38 vs 45 min, p < 0.001). Overall, early (<30 d) and Clavien-Dindo ≥3 postoperative complication rates were lower in the RAKT group (42% vs 29%, 37% vs 21%, and 12.7% vs 5%; p < 0.001). In the multivariable regression analysis, RAKT was predictive of a lower risk of both early postoperative complications (odds ratio 0.43, interquartile range [IQR]: 0.29-0.62, p < 0.001) and reintervention (hazard ratio 0.38, IQR: 0.22-0.66, p < 0.001), which was confirmed with the Kaplan-Meier estimates.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implications: </strong>In experienced centers and appropriately selected recipients, RAKT from a living donor can be adopted to reduce perioperative morbidity and reinterventions without compromising early renal function or long-term patient and graft survival. Further studies should define which subgroups benefit most from RAKT, and evaluate patient-reported outcomes and cost effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":12160,"journal":{"name":"European urology focus","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145780685","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-17DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2025.12.003
Francesco Di Bello, Andrea Gallioli, Alessandro Uleri, Gernot Ortner, Bhaskar Kumar Somani, Tiago Ribeiro de Oliveira, Eric Barret, Panagiotis Kallidonis, Giulio Avesani, Nicola Longo, Alberto Breda, Theodoros Tokas
Background and objective: Kidney-sparing treatments are salvage options for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) after local recurrence. However, there is no level 1 evidence in the literature examining the efficacy of focal therapies (FTs) and partial nephrectomy (PN) in a head-to-head, randomised comparison.
Methods: A systematic search (PROSPERO CRD420251033642) was performed. The present analysis adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses statement.
Key findings and limitations: Overall, 30 studies involving 873 patients were included in the final analysis. Patients with RCC were treated primarily with FTs (n = 376, 43%) and PN (n = 462, 53%). Of FTs, cryoablation was received by 198 (57%) RCC patients. The rates of recurrence for FTs ranged from 4% to 20%, while those for PN ranged from 3% to 19%. The intraoperative complication rates ranged from 2% to 6% for FTs and from 3% to 9% for PN. The postoperative complications rates ranged from 2% to 40% for FTs and from 8% to 40% for PN, while the major postoperative complications rates, defined as Clavien-Dindo ≥3, ranged from 2% to 9% for FTs and from 1% to 18% for PN. The rates of overall survival ranged from 82% to 100% for FTs, and from 96% to 100% for PNs. Limitations included the bias in patients' selection and the absence of time-to-event data.
Conclusions and clinical implications: PN achieved acceptable overall survival, recurrence, and complication profiles, demonstrating its feasibility in a salvage setting. Patient selection is mandatory to identify those best candidates for PN and FT, thereby prioritising oncological outcomes.
{"title":"Kidney-sparing Treatments for Local Recurrence in Renal Cell Tumours After Partial Nephrectomy or Focal Therapy: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Francesco Di Bello, Andrea Gallioli, Alessandro Uleri, Gernot Ortner, Bhaskar Kumar Somani, Tiago Ribeiro de Oliveira, Eric Barret, Panagiotis Kallidonis, Giulio Avesani, Nicola Longo, Alberto Breda, Theodoros Tokas","doi":"10.1016/j.euf.2025.12.003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2025.12.003","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Kidney-sparing treatments are salvage options for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) after local recurrence. However, there is no level 1 evidence in the literature examining the efficacy of focal therapies (FTs) and partial nephrectomy (PN) in a head-to-head, randomised comparison.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search (PROSPERO CRD420251033642) was performed. The present analysis adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses statement.</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>Overall, 30 studies involving 873 patients were included in the final analysis. Patients with RCC were treated primarily with FTs (n = 376, 43%) and PN (n = 462, 53%). Of FTs, cryoablation was received by 198 (57%) RCC patients. The rates of recurrence for FTs ranged from 4% to 20%, while those for PN ranged from 3% to 19%. The intraoperative complication rates ranged from 2% to 6% for FTs and from 3% to 9% for PN. The postoperative complications rates ranged from 2% to 40% for FTs and from 8% to 40% for PN, while the major postoperative complications rates, defined as Clavien-Dindo ≥3, ranged from 2% to 9% for FTs and from 1% to 18% for PN. The rates of overall survival ranged from 82% to 100% for FTs, and from 96% to 100% for PNs. Limitations included the bias in patients' selection and the absence of time-to-event data.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implications: </strong>PN achieved acceptable overall survival, recurrence, and complication profiles, demonstrating its feasibility in a salvage setting. Patient selection is mandatory to identify those best candidates for PN and FT, thereby prioritising oncological outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":12160,"journal":{"name":"European urology focus","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145780691","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-17DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2025.12.004
Pietro Diana, Marco Paciotti, Nicola Frego, Andrea Gallioli, Francesco Di Bello, Paola Arena, Alessandro Uleri, Federica Sordelli, Giuseppe Garofano, Lucia Dieguez, Omid Sedigh, Paolo Gontero, Anthony Gallagher, Alex Mottrie, Joan Palou, Alberto Breda, Nicolo Maria Buffi
Background and objective: Transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) is one of the procedures most often performed by trainee urologists. ENTRY is a cooperative partnership aimed at improving the training of urology residents. Metrics for TURBT were published after a Delphi consensus process involving experts. The aim of this study was to assess the reliability and construct validity (via known-group and convergent validity) of objective metrics for characterizing the intraoperative performance of TUTBT as optimal versus suboptimal.
Methods: Thirty videos of TURBT performed by experts (n = 15) and novices (n = 15) were evaluated by three experienced urologists trained to reliably and independently score TURBT performance using the metrics previously developed. The videos were anonymized and the assessors were blinded to the surgeon, hospital, and expertise. The inter-rater reliability score was assessed and surgical errors were reported using a dummy dichotomous variable. A two-sample Wilcoxon rank-sum (Mann-Whitney) test was applied for between-group comparisons.
Key findings and limitations: The median number of overall errors was 1 (interquartile range [IQR] 0-2) in the expert group versus 5 (IQR 4-7) in the novice group, with a median difference of -4 errors (95% confidence interval [CI] -5 to -3; p = 0.001). The median number of noncritical errors per TURBT procedure was 1 (IQR 0-2) in the expert group versus 3 (IQR 2-4) in the novice group, with a median difference of -2 errors (95% CI -3 to -1; p = 0.001). The median number of critical errors was 0 (IQR 0-1) for the expert group versus 2 (IQR 2-3) for the novice group, with a median difference of -2 errors (95% CI -3 to -1; p = 0.001). We compared the performance of the expert and novice groups, which revealed a concordance index of 0.6 for noncritical errors, 0.73 for critical errors, and 0.66 for overall errors.
Conclusions and clinical implications: Our study demonstrates the construct validity of metrics developed for the quality of TURBT performance. This represents a further step in establishing a quality-assured structured and standardized training program for TURBT.
{"title":"Intraoperative Skills for Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumor: Objective Assessment and Construct Validity of the ENTRY Metrics.","authors":"Pietro Diana, Marco Paciotti, Nicola Frego, Andrea Gallioli, Francesco Di Bello, Paola Arena, Alessandro Uleri, Federica Sordelli, Giuseppe Garofano, Lucia Dieguez, Omid Sedigh, Paolo Gontero, Anthony Gallagher, Alex Mottrie, Joan Palou, Alberto Breda, Nicolo Maria Buffi","doi":"10.1016/j.euf.2025.12.004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2025.12.004","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) is one of the procedures most often performed by trainee urologists. ENTRY is a cooperative partnership aimed at improving the training of urology residents. Metrics for TURBT were published after a Delphi consensus process involving experts. The aim of this study was to assess the reliability and construct validity (via known-group and convergent validity) of objective metrics for characterizing the intraoperative performance of TUTBT as optimal versus suboptimal.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty videos of TURBT performed by experts (n = 15) and novices (n = 15) were evaluated by three experienced urologists trained to reliably and independently score TURBT performance using the metrics previously developed. The videos were anonymized and the assessors were blinded to the surgeon, hospital, and expertise. The inter-rater reliability score was assessed and surgical errors were reported using a dummy dichotomous variable. A two-sample Wilcoxon rank-sum (Mann-Whitney) test was applied for between-group comparisons.</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>The median number of overall errors was 1 (interquartile range [IQR] 0-2) in the expert group versus 5 (IQR 4-7) in the novice group, with a median difference of -4 errors (95% confidence interval [CI] -5 to -3; p = 0.001). The median number of noncritical errors per TURBT procedure was 1 (IQR 0-2) in the expert group versus 3 (IQR 2-4) in the novice group, with a median difference of -2 errors (95% CI -3 to -1; p = 0.001). The median number of critical errors was 0 (IQR 0-1) for the expert group versus 2 (IQR 2-3) for the novice group, with a median difference of -2 errors (95% CI -3 to -1; p = 0.001). We compared the performance of the expert and novice groups, which revealed a concordance index of 0.6 for noncritical errors, 0.73 for critical errors, and 0.66 for overall errors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implications: </strong>Our study demonstrates the construct validity of metrics developed for the quality of TURBT performance. This represents a further step in establishing a quality-assured structured and standardized training program for TURBT.</p>","PeriodicalId":12160,"journal":{"name":"European urology focus","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145780731","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-16DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2025.12.005
Ioannis Loufopoulos, Efstathios Papaefstathiou, Jean-Nicolas Cornu, Christian Gratzke, Apostolos Apostolidis
Background and objective: Overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms are prevalent in patients with bladder outlet obstruction (BOO). Although the pathogenesis of OAB in men with BOO is still under investigation, OAB symptoms might persist following an outflow surgery. It is, thus, crucial to prognosticate preoperatively the outcome of a deobstructive operation. This review aims to systematically investigate the preoperative factors that could prognosticate the persistence of OAB symptoms following deobstruction surgery in males.
Methods: This is a systematic review of the current literature according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. Randomised controlled trials and observational studies of both prospective and retrospective design were considered eligible for the analysis. The Quality in Prognosis Studies tool was used for assessing the risk of bias.
Key findings and limitations: Thirty studies, involving 8043 patients who had persistent storage symptoms following surgical BOO relief, were included. Across adjusted analyses, older age and a higher baseline storage symptom burden were the most frequently associated factors, though findings were inconsistent. Urodynamic measures such as detrusor overactivity, bladder capacity, and detrusor contractility showed heterogeneous results, with some positive and some protective signals. Other factors (eg, prostate volume, prostate-specific antigen, maximum flow rate, postvoid residual, and comorbidities) were uniformly null. Overall certainty of evidence was very low, reflecting inconsistency, imprecision, and reliance on single-study signals.
Conclusions and clinical implications: Current evidence is of limited quality; no preoperative factor demonstrated robust prognostic value. Older age and a greater storage symptom burden may be associated with persistence in some adjusted models, whilst urodynamic prognostic factors remain uncertain.
{"title":"Prognostic Factors of Persistent Overactive Bladder/Storage Symptoms following Deobstruction Surgery for Benign Prostatic Enlargement in Males: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Ioannis Loufopoulos, Efstathios Papaefstathiou, Jean-Nicolas Cornu, Christian Gratzke, Apostolos Apostolidis","doi":"10.1016/j.euf.2025.12.005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2025.12.005","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms are prevalent in patients with bladder outlet obstruction (BOO). Although the pathogenesis of OAB in men with BOO is still under investigation, OAB symptoms might persist following an outflow surgery. It is, thus, crucial to prognosticate preoperatively the outcome of a deobstructive operation. This review aims to systematically investigate the preoperative factors that could prognosticate the persistence of OAB symptoms following deobstruction surgery in males.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a systematic review of the current literature according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. Randomised controlled trials and observational studies of both prospective and retrospective design were considered eligible for the analysis. The Quality in Prognosis Studies tool was used for assessing the risk of bias.</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>Thirty studies, involving 8043 patients who had persistent storage symptoms following surgical BOO relief, were included. Across adjusted analyses, older age and a higher baseline storage symptom burden were the most frequently associated factors, though findings were inconsistent. Urodynamic measures such as detrusor overactivity, bladder capacity, and detrusor contractility showed heterogeneous results, with some positive and some protective signals. Other factors (eg, prostate volume, prostate-specific antigen, maximum flow rate, postvoid residual, and comorbidities) were uniformly null. Overall certainty of evidence was very low, reflecting inconsistency, imprecision, and reliance on single-study signals.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implications: </strong>Current evidence is of limited quality; no preoperative factor demonstrated robust prognostic value. Older age and a greater storage symptom burden may be associated with persistence in some adjusted models, whilst urodynamic prognostic factors remain uncertain.</p>","PeriodicalId":12160,"journal":{"name":"European urology focus","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145774138","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-15DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2025.11.020
Tonghu Liu, Congcong Zhu, Zechen Yan
{"title":"Re: Heidi Fettke, Louise Kostos, Maria Docanto, et al. Baseline and Early On-treatment Circulating Tumour DNA Fraction Are a Key Prognostic Biomarker in Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer Treated with [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-PSMA-617. Eur Urol. In press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2025.08.015.","authors":"Tonghu Liu, Congcong Zhu, Zechen Yan","doi":"10.1016/j.euf.2025.11.020","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2025.11.020","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12160,"journal":{"name":"European urology focus","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145767562","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-12DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2025.12.002
Navid Roessler, Marcin Miszczyk, Keiichiro Miyajima, Ahmed R Alfarhan, Abdulrahman S Alqahtani, Shota Inoue, Heidemarie Ofner, Julia Weiss, Tamás Fazekas, Tim A Ludwig, Malte W Vetterlein, Mieke Van Hemelrijck, Berna C Özdemir, Margit Fisch, Shahrokh F Shariat
Background and objective: The choice between different urinary diversion types carries distinct implications for physical appearance and psychosocial outcomes. This systematic review aims to synthesize current evidence on how different urinary diversion types influence patients' body image and decision regret.
Methods: In this prospectively registered systematic review (CRD420251079300), we searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science in June 2025 for studies reporting body image and decision regret outcomes in patients undergoing urinary diversion after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. Data were synthesized descriptively, and the risk of bias was assessed using the Risk Of Bias in Non-randomized Studies-of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool.
Key findings and limitations: Of 1837 records screened, 31 studies comprising 5180 patients were included: 24 assessed body image (n = 4552), six decision regret (n = 579), and one both (n = 49). Diversion types comprised orthotopic neobladder (n = 1848), ileal conduit (n = 2970), continent cutaneous diversion (n = 61), cutaneous ureterostomy (n = 206), and ureterosigmoidostomy (n = 95). Most studies evaluated body image using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Bladder Cancer Module (EORTC QLQ-BLM30; 13 studies) or Body Image Scale (seven studies). Decision regret was measured via the Decision Regret Scale (two studies) or custom questionnaires (five studies). Among 17 comparative studies on body image and six on decision regret, most reported favorable body image and lower decision regret in patients with continent versus incontinent urinary diversions. Most studies exhibited moderate to serious risks of bias, primarily due to retrospective designs, missing response data, and incomplete reporting of diversion-specific questionnaire participation.
Conclusions and clinical implications: Urinary diversion choice after radical cystectomy affects body image and decision regret, with continent options generally linked to better psychosocial outcomes. Given the heterogeneity of current evidence, patient-centered counseling, expectation management, and social support are essential to improve long-term satisfaction and quality of life.
{"title":"The Influence of Urinary Diversion Type on Body Image and Decision Regret Following Radical Cystectomy: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Navid Roessler, Marcin Miszczyk, Keiichiro Miyajima, Ahmed R Alfarhan, Abdulrahman S Alqahtani, Shota Inoue, Heidemarie Ofner, Julia Weiss, Tamás Fazekas, Tim A Ludwig, Malte W Vetterlein, Mieke Van Hemelrijck, Berna C Özdemir, Margit Fisch, Shahrokh F Shariat","doi":"10.1016/j.euf.2025.12.002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2025.12.002","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>The choice between different urinary diversion types carries distinct implications for physical appearance and psychosocial outcomes. This systematic review aims to synthesize current evidence on how different urinary diversion types influence patients' body image and decision regret.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospectively registered systematic review (CRD420251079300), we searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science in June 2025 for studies reporting body image and decision regret outcomes in patients undergoing urinary diversion after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. Data were synthesized descriptively, and the risk of bias was assessed using the Risk Of Bias in Non-randomized Studies-of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool.</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>Of 1837 records screened, 31 studies comprising 5180 patients were included: 24 assessed body image (n = 4552), six decision regret (n = 579), and one both (n = 49). Diversion types comprised orthotopic neobladder (n = 1848), ileal conduit (n = 2970), continent cutaneous diversion (n = 61), cutaneous ureterostomy (n = 206), and ureterosigmoidostomy (n = 95). Most studies evaluated body image using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Bladder Cancer Module (EORTC QLQ-BLM30; 13 studies) or Body Image Scale (seven studies). Decision regret was measured via the Decision Regret Scale (two studies) or custom questionnaires (five studies). Among 17 comparative studies on body image and six on decision regret, most reported favorable body image and lower decision regret in patients with continent versus incontinent urinary diversions. Most studies exhibited moderate to serious risks of bias, primarily due to retrospective designs, missing response data, and incomplete reporting of diversion-specific questionnaire participation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implications: </strong>Urinary diversion choice after radical cystectomy affects body image and decision regret, with continent options generally linked to better psychosocial outcomes. Given the heterogeneity of current evidence, patient-centered counseling, expectation management, and social support are essential to improve long-term satisfaction and quality of life.</p>","PeriodicalId":12160,"journal":{"name":"European urology focus","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145751895","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-11DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2025.12.001
Tessa van Elst, Pedro Lopez, Laurien M Buffart, Jose A E Custers, Lieke Wever, Jippe C de Bie, Peter F A Mulders, Haiko J Bloemendal, Jean-Paul A van Basten, Niven Mehra
Background and objective: In metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC), health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is key for personalised treatment decisions. We compared the impact of different mHSPC treatment strategies on HRQoL, tackling a previously unaddressed challenge in comparing the outcomes across different patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).
Methods: A systematic review was conducted of prospective studies reporting HRQoL outcomes of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) alone or with placebo, radiotherapy, abiraterone, apalutamide, enzalutamide, and/or docetaxel in mHSPC (CRD42021227902). Databases were searched in April 2022 and April 2024. HRQoL domains across different PROMs were harmonised using the Wilson and Cleary model. A frequentist network meta-analysis (NMA) compared 12-mo treatment effects using standardised mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05.
Key findings and limitations: Of the 24 articles included, nine were analysed in the NMA (eight trials, n = 6248). ADT + abiraterone resulted in significantly less pain than ADT + placebo (SMD: -0.22, 95% CI [-0.33; -0.10], p < 0.001), ADT + apalutamide (SMD: -0.17, 95% CI [-0.31; -0.02], p = 0.022), and ADT + enzalutamide (SMD: -0.23, 95% CI [-0.37; -0.09], p = 0.001). Less fatigue was observed with ADT + abiraterone versus ADT + enzalutamide (SMD: -0.45, 95% CI [-0.88; -0.02], p = 0.041). ADT + abiraterone showed significantly better physical functioning than ADT + enzalutamide (p = 0.015) and ADT + placebo (p = 0.032). Both were also associated with significantly worse general health perception than ADT alone, ADT + docetaxel, and ADT + radiotherapy. General health perception and overall quality of life were significantly better with ADT + abiraterone than with ADT + enzalutamide, ADT + apalutamide, and ADT + placebo (p < 0.001). The limitations include heterogeneity (0-76%) and few eligible trials.
Conclusions and clinical implications: HRQoL outcomes differ across treatment strategies for mHSPC. At 12 mo, ADT + abiraterone yielded the most favourable HRQoL profile.
{"title":"Impact of Metastatic Hormone-sensitive Prostate Cancer Treatments on Health-related Quality of Life: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.","authors":"Tessa van Elst, Pedro Lopez, Laurien M Buffart, Jose A E Custers, Lieke Wever, Jippe C de Bie, Peter F A Mulders, Haiko J Bloemendal, Jean-Paul A van Basten, Niven Mehra","doi":"10.1016/j.euf.2025.12.001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2025.12.001","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>In metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC), health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is key for personalised treatment decisions. We compared the impact of different mHSPC treatment strategies on HRQoL, tackling a previously unaddressed challenge in comparing the outcomes across different patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was conducted of prospective studies reporting HRQoL outcomes of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) alone or with placebo, radiotherapy, abiraterone, apalutamide, enzalutamide, and/or docetaxel in mHSPC (CRD42021227902). Databases were searched in April 2022 and April 2024. HRQoL domains across different PROMs were harmonised using the Wilson and Cleary model. A frequentist network meta-analysis (NMA) compared 12-mo treatment effects using standardised mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>Of the 24 articles included, nine were analysed in the NMA (eight trials, n = 6248). ADT + abiraterone resulted in significantly less pain than ADT + placebo (SMD: -0.22, 95% CI [-0.33; -0.10], p < 0.001), ADT + apalutamide (SMD: -0.17, 95% CI [-0.31; -0.02], p = 0.022), and ADT + enzalutamide (SMD: -0.23, 95% CI [-0.37; -0.09], p = 0.001). Less fatigue was observed with ADT + abiraterone versus ADT + enzalutamide (SMD: -0.45, 95% CI [-0.88; -0.02], p = 0.041). ADT + abiraterone showed significantly better physical functioning than ADT + enzalutamide (p = 0.015) and ADT + placebo (p = 0.032). Both were also associated with significantly worse general health perception than ADT alone, ADT + docetaxel, and ADT + radiotherapy. General health perception and overall quality of life were significantly better with ADT + abiraterone than with ADT + enzalutamide, ADT + apalutamide, and ADT + placebo (p < 0.001). The limitations include heterogeneity (0-76%) and few eligible trials.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implications: </strong>HRQoL outcomes differ across treatment strategies for mHSPC. At 12 mo, ADT + abiraterone yielded the most favourable HRQoL profile.</p>","PeriodicalId":12160,"journal":{"name":"European urology focus","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145741201","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}