European urology focus最新文献

Both the CheckMate-901 (gemcitabine-cisplatin plus nivolumab) trial and the EV-302 (enfortumab-vedotin plus pembrolizumab; EV+P) trial have shown a significant improvement in OS over standard (cis)platinum-based chemotherapy. The effect size, as well as the broader eligibility criteria for EV+P position this regimen as a compelling preferred candidate for the new standard of care in front-line mUC treatment.

Background and objective: Major urological guidelines do not currently recommend robot-assisted surgery compared with laparoscopic or open surgery due to the lack of high-quality evidence. We aimed to provide real-world data on the evolution of robotic urology and to compare its perioperative outcomes with those of laparoscopic and open surgeries.

Methods: We used the GeRmAn Nationwide inpatient Data (GRAND), provided by the Research Data Center of the Federal Bureau of Statistics (2005-2021), and performed multiple patient-level analyses. We included patients undergoing major urological surgeries and report the largest study in the field with 993 276 patients.

Key findings and limitations: An open approach was performed in 733 416 cases, a laparoscopic approach in 109 428, and a robot-assisted approach in 150 432. Overall, 442 811 (45%) patients underwent radical prostatectomy, 129 943 (13%) radical cystectomy, 192 340 (19%) radical nephrectomy, 123 648 (12%) partial nephrectomy, 56 114 (5.6%) nephroureterectomy, and 48 420 (4.9%) pyeloplasty. The number of patients undergoing robot-assisted surgery increased exponentially, while the number of patients undergoing open surgery decreased substantially throughout the past few years. Patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery displayed slightly better, but clinically insignificant, baseline characteristics. After adjusting for the major risk factors in the multivariate regression analysis, robotic versus open surgery was associated with significantly lower odds of mortality for all five major oncological surgeries and with lower odds of intensive care unit admission, transfusion, and length of hospital stay for all six major urological surgeries.

Conclusions and clinical implications: Robotic surgery is becoming the mainstay in major urological operations.

Patient summary: Patients selected for robotic surgery in Germany presented better perioperative outcomes compared to those operated with an open approach.

Background and objective: There are limited data on the prevalence and management of testicular germ cell tumor (TGCT) cases presenting with venous tumor thrombus (VTT). Our objectives were to describe the prevalence of TGCT with VTT, to identify a multicenter retrospective cohort, and to ascertain expert opinion regarding optimal management of this entity.

Methods: Using the IBM Marketscan database, we identified men with testicular cancer who underwent retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) with concurrent VTT or inferior vena cava (IVC) tumor thrombectomy to estimate the prevalence of VTT in TGCT. To identify a multicenter retrospective cohort of patients, we surveyed surgeons and described the presentation, management, and outcomes for the cohort.

Key findings and limitations: The prevalence of TGCT with VTT in the IBM Marketscan database was 0.3% (n = 7/2517) when using stringent criteria and 3.1% (n = 79/2517) when using broad criteria. In response to our survey, 16 surgeons from ten centers contributed data for 34 patients. Most patients (n = 29, 85%) presented with nonseminomatous germ cell tumor. Surgical management was used for 93.9% (n = 31), including postchemotherapy tumor thrombectomy with primary cavorrhaphy in 63%. The Marketscan analysis was limited to insured individuals and did not include clinicopathological details, and use of billing codes may have included patients with stromal tumors. In addition, lack of responses to the anonymous survey limited data capture, and the RedCap survey did not address symptoms specific to IVC obstruction or allow central review of the imaging leading to VTT diagnosis.

Conclusions and clinical implications: VTT among males with TGCT is rare and requires complex multidisciplinary management, including venous tumor thrombectomy at the time of postchemotherapy RPLND.

Patient summary: Using a medical database, we estimated that the frequency of testicular cancer cases in which the tumor extends into a blood vessel (called venous tumor thrombus, VTT) is just 0.3-3.1%. We carried out a survey of surgeons with experience of this condition. Our results indicate that although testicular cancers respond well to chemotherapy, VTT is less responsive and complex surgery is necessary for this rare condition.

Background and objective: Stockholm3 is a comprehensive blood test amalgamating protein biomarkers, genetic indicators, and clinical data to predict clinically significant prostate cancer risk (International Society of Urological Pathology grade ≥2 upon biopsy). Our study aims to externally validate Stockholm3 and compare its performance with the use of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and the Rotterdam Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator (RPCRC) for clinically significant prostate cancer detection.

Methods: We gathered data from men subjected to prostate biopsies at the Martini-Klinik, Germany, between 2014 and 2017. Participants were selected based on elevated PSA levels or suspicious digital rectal examinations, all undergoing a 10-12-core systematic biopsy without a magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy. We assessed Stockholm3 and RPCRC performance for clinically significant prostate cancer detection. Furthermore, we compared the proportion of men recommended for biopsy and biopsy outcomes with Stockholm3 and RPCRC against PSA ≥3 ng/ml.

Key findings and limitations: Our study encompassed 405 biopsied men, with a median age of 66 yr (interquartile range [IQR]: 60-72), PSA levels at 7 ng/ml (IQR: 5.2-10.8), and Stockholm3 scores at 18 (IQR: 10-34). Among them, 128 men (31%) received clinically significant prostate cancer diagnoses. Employing the recommended Stockholm3 threshold (≥15) could have reduced unnecessary biopsies by 52%, while detecting 92% of clinically significant cases compared with using PSA ≥3 ng/ml as a biopsy criterion. Both Stockholm3 and RPCRC exhibited strong discrimination, with area under the curve values of 0.80 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.76-0.85) and 0.75 (95% CI: 0.70-0.80), respectively. Stockholm3 demonstrated good calibration, while RPCRC underestimated the risk compared with observed outcomes. Moreover, Stockholm3 yielded positive clinical net benefits, whereas RPCRC yielded negative net benefits for clinically relevant thresholds.

Conclusions and clinical implications: Stockholm3 utilization could detect 92% of clinically significant prostate cancer cases while simultaneously reducing unnecessary biopsies by 52%, compared with the PSA ≥3 ng/ml criterion, based on our analysis within a cohort of men who underwent systematic biopsies.

Patient summary: In a German clinical cohort of 405 men, Stockholm3, a blood test for early prostate cancer detection, exhibited favorable clinical benefits. It identified a substantial number of clinically significant cases while reducing unnecessary biopsies by over half in men without the disease and those with clinically nonsignificant prostate cancer.

There have been significant advances in our understanding of the biology of metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa) and its response to therapy. Androgen receptor (AR) alterations, including mutations, amplifications, splice variants, and alternative activations, play a significant role in mPCa resistance to treatment. Recent studies indicate that AR alterations detected via genomic testing can be considered predictive biomarkers in men with castration-resistant PCa and can guide treatment strategies. Novel therapeutic approaches, including AR antagonists and inhibitors of ACK1, the AR N-terminal domain, or cytochrome P450 11A1, have shown promise in overcoming treatment resistance. Ongoing clinical trials are exploring the efficacy of these treatments in relation to AR mutation status and could potentially transform the treatment landscape for mPCa. PATIENT SUMMARY: Our mini review highlights advances in the treatment of metastatic prostate cancer, with a focus on drugs that target genetic alterations affecting a protein called the androgen receptor. Some promising results have been obtained and clinical trials are ongoing.

Background and objective: Until a few years ago, a midurethral sling was considered the gold standard for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence (SUI) after failure of conservative therapies. However, criticisms regarding the rate of mesh exposure and lack of long-term efficacy have led to reconsideration of other surgical procedures. Our aim was to investigate long-term subjective and objective outcomes after injection of Macroplastique, a urethral bulking agent.

Methods: We prospectively enrolled all consecutive women complaining of pure SUI symptoms with urodynamically proven SUI who received a Macroplastique injection. We investigated patient-reported subjective outcomes using International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form, Urogenital Distress Inventory, Patient Global Impression of Improvement, and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) questionnaires, and the cough stress test to assess objective outcomes. Adverse events were recorded during follow-up.

Key findings and limitations: At 10 yr after Macroplastique injection, the objective cure rate was 56% and 71% of patients reported that they were satisfied. Long-term data revealed no significant decline in subjective or objective cure rates. No serious complications were reported. Study limitations include the small sample size and the lack of pad tests and bladder diaries for postoperative evaluations.

Conclusions and clinical implications: Our study shows that Macroplastique injection can be an effective and safe option for the treatment of female SUI in the long term, even when used in the first-line setting.

Patient summary: We evaluated outcomes for women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) who were treated with an injection of Macroplastique gel into the wall of the urethra to prevent leakage of urine. We found that this is a safe option for treatment of female SUI that is effective in the long term.

Background and objective: While obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and urological cancer are both strongly associated with hypoxia, controversy exists regarding their association with each other. This study aims to summarize and synthesize evidence to clarify the association between OSA and urological cancer incidence and mortality.

Methods: According to a prespecified protocol, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Scopus were searched from inception to November 16, 2023, for observational and randomized studies reporting the association of OSA with urological cancer incidence or mortality. We pooled maximally covariate-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) using a random-effects inverse variance-weighted model. Two reviewers independently assessed the quality of evidence using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework.

Key findings and limitations: From 1814 records, we included 12 studies comprising 9 290 818 participants in total, of which nine studies were analyzed quantitatively. OSA patients had an increased risk of kidney (HR: 1.75, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.21-2.53) and bladder (HR: 1.76, 95% CI: 1.05-2.96) cancer. However, OSA was not associated with prostate cancer incidence (HR: 1.29, 95% CI: 0.82-2.04). We systematically reviewed evidence surrounding OSA and testicular cancer incidence and urological cancer mortality.

Conclusions and clinical implications: OSA may be associated with a higher risk of kidney and bladder cancer, but not prostate cancer. Future work may help clarify the possibility of a dose-response relationship between OSA and urological cancer, and the effect of OSA treatment on urological cancer incidence or progression.

Patient summary: This research highlights a potential longitudinal association between OSA and kidney and bladder cancer, but not prostate cancer.

Background and objective: Readability of patient education materials is of utmost importance to ensure understandability and dissemination of health care information in uro-oncology. We aimed to investigate the readability of the official patient education materials of the European Association of Urology (EAU) and American Urology Association (AUA).

Methods: Patient education materials for prostate, bladder, kidney, testicular, penile, and urethral cancers were retrieved from the respective organizations. Readability was assessed via the WebFX online tool for Flesch Kincaid Reading Ease Score (FRES) and for reading grade levels by Flesch Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL), Gunning Fog Score (GFS), Smog Index (SI), Coleman Liau Index (CLI), and Automated Readability Index (ARI). Layperson readability was defined as a FRES of ≥70 and with the other readability indexes <7 according to European Union recommendations. This study assessed only objective readability and no other metrics such as understandability.

Key findings and limitations: Most patient education materials failed to meet the recommended threshold for laypersons. The mean readability for EAU patient education material was as follows: FRES 50.9 (standard error [SE]: 3.0), and FKGL, GFS, SI, CLI, and ARI all with scores ≥7. The mean readability for AUA patient material was as follows: FRES 64.0 (SE: 1.4), with all of FKGL, GFS, SI, and ARI scoring ≥7 readability. Only 13 out of 70 (18.6%) patient education materials' paragraphs met the readability requirements. The mean readability for bladder cancer patient education materials was the lowest, with a FRES of 36.7 (SE: 4.1).

Conclusions and clinical implications: Patient education materials from leading urological associations reveal readability levels beyond the recommended thresholds for laypersons and may not be understood easily by patients. There is a future need for more patient-friendly reading materials.

Patient summary: This study checked whether health information about different cancers was easy to read. Most of it was too hard for patients to understand.