首页 > 最新文献

Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics最新文献

英文 中文
Editorial: Beyond DNA Suppression: HBV RNA as a Predictor of Hepatocarcinogenesis. 编辑:DNA抑制之外:HBV RNA作为肝癌发生的预测因子。
IF 7.6 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-10 DOI: 10.1111/apt.70497
Toshifumi Tada
{"title":"Editorial: Beyond DNA Suppression: HBV RNA as a Predictor of Hepatocarcinogenesis.","authors":"Toshifumi Tada","doi":"10.1111/apt.70497","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.70497","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":121,"journal":{"name":"Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145710836","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Message From the Editors 编辑们的留言
IF 6.7 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-09 DOI: 10.1111/apt.70454
Colin W. Howden, Rohit Loomba

Welcome to the first edition of AP&T for 2026.

Our most recent 2-year impact factor of 6.7 keeps AP&T in 18th position among 147 journals in our field. We congratulate the authors of the 10 papers published in 2024 that were most highly cited in 2025 [1-10], and of the 10 most frequently downloaded papers between October 2024 and September 2025 [11-20]. As expected, steatotic liver disease and IBD continue to be highly important topics for AP&T.

Excluding editorials and letters, we received 2,020 new submissions between January and September 2025, and ultimately accepted 153 (7.6%). Decisions on individual submissions are made objectively and are based on quality and likely relevance to the readership. We strive to maintain a balance between hepatology and ‘luminal’ gastroenterology. For some papers we are unable to accept, we offer transfer—as appropriate—to Neurogastroenterology and Motility, Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology, or Pharmacology Research and Perspectives.

During 2025, Cynthia Seow stepped down from her position as Associate Editor and will be replaced by Tim Card (University of Nottingham, UK). Alex Ford also stepped down at the end of 2025 after 14 years with the journal. Alex will be replaced by Chris Black (University of Leeds, UK). We thank Cynthia and Alex for their service and look forward to working with Tim and Chris. We congratulate Alex on his new position as Deputy Editor-in-Chief of Gut.

One change made in 2025 was the discontinuation of the Research Communication option. In 2026, submissions to AP&T, as well as the peer-review process, are now handled through our publisher's Research Exchange (ReX) system. Doubtless, there will be a learning curve but we hope that this will streamline the submission and review process and provide yet more safeguards against such issues as plagiarism, image manipulation and other forms of academic misconduct.

Please continue to consider AP&T for your original research and review articles in digestive and liver disease. Authors with a proposal for a review article may contact us in advance to discuss its content and scope. While we cannot accept many of the submissions we receive, we will provide a scrupulously fair and transparent review process and a rapid decision. In fact, AP&T continues to have the shortest decision times among journals in our field.

欢迎来到2026年的第一版AP&;T。我们最近的2年影响因子为6.7,使AP&;T在我们领域的147种期刊中排名第18位。我们祝贺2024年发表的10篇2025年被引次数最多的论文[1-10],以及2024年10月至2025年9月下载次数最多的10篇论文[11-20]的作者。正如预期的那样,脂肪变性肝病和IBD仍然是AP&;T非常重要的话题。除去社论和信件,我们在2025年1月至9月期间收到了2020份新投稿,最终接受了153份(7.6%)。对个人提交的决定是客观的,基于质量和可能与读者的相关性。我们努力保持肝病和肠胃病之间的平衡。对于一些我们无法接受的论文,我们提供适当的转移到神经胃肠病学和运动学,基础临床药理学和毒理学,或药理学研究与展望。2025年,辛西娅·肖(Cynthia Seow)辞去副主编的职务,由英国诺丁汉大学的蒂姆·卡德(Tim Card)接替。亚历克斯·福特(Alex Ford)在为《华尔街日报》工作了14年后,也于2025年底辞职。亚历克斯将由克里斯·布莱克(英国利兹大学)接替。我们感谢辛西娅和亚历克斯的服务,并期待着与蒂姆和克里斯合作。我们祝贺Alex担任Gut副总编辑。2025年的一个变化是停止了研究交流选项。在2026年,提交给AP&;T的论文,以及同行评审过程,现在通过我们出版商的研究交流(ReX)系统进行处理。毫无疑问,将会有一个学习曲线,但我们希望这将简化提交和审查过程,并提供更多的保护措施,防止抄袭、图像处理和其他形式的学术不端行为。请继续考虑您在消化和肝脏疾病方面的原创研究和综述文章的AP&;T。建议撰写综述文章的作者可以提前与我们联系,讨论文章的内容和范围。虽然我们不能接受我们收到的许多提交,但我们将提供一个严格公平和透明的审查过程,并迅速做出决定。事实上,AP&;T在我们这个领域的期刊中仍然拥有最短的决策时间。
{"title":"A Message From the Editors","authors":"Colin W. Howden,&nbsp;Rohit Loomba","doi":"10.1111/apt.70454","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.70454","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Welcome to the first edition of <i>AP&amp;T</i> for 2026.</p><p>Our most recent 2-year impact factor of 6.7 keeps <i>AP&amp;T</i> in 18th position among 147 journals in our field. We congratulate the authors of the 10 papers published in 2024 that were most highly cited in 2025 [<span>1-10</span>], and of the 10 most frequently downloaded papers between October 2024 and September 2025 [<span>11-20</span>]. As expected, steatotic liver disease and IBD continue to be highly important topics for <i>AP&amp;T</i>.</p><p>Excluding editorials and letters, we received 2,020 new submissions between January and September 2025, and ultimately accepted 153 (7.6%). Decisions on individual submissions are made objectively and are based on quality and likely relevance to the readership. We strive to maintain a balance between hepatology and ‘luminal’ gastroenterology. For some papers we are unable to accept, we offer transfer—as appropriate—to <i>Neurogastroenterology and Motility</i>, <i>Basic &amp; Clinical Pharmacology &amp; Toxicology</i>, or <i>Pharmacology Research and Perspectives</i>.</p><p>During 2025, Cynthia Seow stepped down from her position as Associate Editor and will be replaced by Tim Card (University of Nottingham, UK). Alex Ford also stepped down at the end of 2025 after 14 years with the journal. Alex will be replaced by Chris Black (University of Leeds, UK). We thank Cynthia and Alex for their service and look forward to working with Tim and Chris. We congratulate Alex on his new position as Deputy Editor-in-Chief of <i>Gut</i>.</p><p>One change made in 2025 was the discontinuation of the Research Communication option. In 2026, submissions to <i>AP&amp;T</i>, as well as the peer-review process, are now handled through our publisher's Research Exchange (ReX) system. Doubtless, there will be a learning curve but we hope that this will streamline the submission and review process and provide yet more safeguards against such issues as plagiarism, image manipulation and other forms of academic misconduct.</p><p>Please continue to consider <i>AP&amp;T</i> for your original research and review articles in digestive and liver disease. Authors with a proposal for a review article may contact us in advance to discuss its content and scope. While we cannot accept many of the submissions we receive, we will provide a scrupulously fair and transparent review process and a rapid decision. In fact, <i>AP&amp;T</i> continues to have the shortest decision times among journals in our field.</p>","PeriodicalId":121,"journal":{"name":"Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics","volume":"63 1","pages":"4-5"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7,"publicationDate":"2025-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/apt.70454","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145706533","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
AP&T: Editors' Declarations of Interest 编辑利益声明
IF 6.7 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-09 DOI: 10.1111/apt.70468
<p> <b> <i>Professor C. W. Howden, Editor</i> </b> </p><p>Professor Howden is a consultant/speaker for Phathom Pharmaceuticals, consultant/speaker for RedHill Biopharma, consultant/speaker for Meridian Diagnostics, consultant for Sebela/Braintree and consultant for ISOThrive. He has stock options in EndoStim.</p><p> <b> <i>Professor R. Loomba, Editor</i> </b> </p><p>Professor Loomba serves as a consultant to Aardvark Therapeutics, Altimmune, Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca, Cascade Pharmaceuticals, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Glympse bio, Inipharma, Intercept, Inventiva, Ionis, Janssen Inc., Lipidio, Madrigal, Neurobo, Novo Nordisk, Merck, Pfizer, Sagimet, 89 bio, Takeda, Terns Pharmaceuticals and Viking Therapeutics. He has stock options in Sagimet biosciences. In addition, his institution received research grants from Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Galectin Therapeutics, Gilead, Intercept, Hanmi, Intercept, Inventiva, Ionis, Janssen, Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Merck, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Sonic Incytes and Terns Pharmaceuticals. He is also the co-founder of LipoNexus Inc.</p><p> <b> <i>Professor G. M. Dusheiko, Associate Editor</i> </b> </p><p>Professor Dusheiko serves on independent data safety monitoring boards for Aligos, Arbutus, Glaxo Smith Kline, Janssen and Gilead. In the past two years, he has received honoraria from Arbutus, Antios, Aligos and Gilead Sciences, and he serves as an advisor to the National Medical Research Council, Singapore; the TherVacB Consortium (European Horizon Grant); and the A-Tango Consortium (EUH2020 grant).</p><p> <b> <i>Professor G. L.-H. Wong, Associate Editor</i> </b> </p><p>Professor Wong has served as an advisory committee member for AstraZeneca, Barinthus Biotherapeutics, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen and Virion; has served as a speaker for Abbott, AbbVie, Ascletis Pharmaceuticals, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Echosens, Ferring, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen and Roche; and has received research grants from Gilead Sciences.</p><p> <b> <i>Professor R. B. Gearry, Associate Editor</i> </b> </p><p>Professor Gearry is, or has been, a member of advisory boards for AbbVie, Janssen, Schering-Plough, Zespri, Baxter and Celltrion. He has received honoraria or travel grants from AbbVie, Janssen, Schering Plough, Zespri, Ferring and Celltrion. He has received research grants for investigator-initiated studies from AbbVie, Janssen, Goodman-Fielder, Comvita and Zespri.</p><p> <b> <i>Dr. S. Subramanian, Associate Editor</i> </b> </p><p>Dr. Subramanian is/has been on the speaker bureau for Abbvie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celltrio
C. W. Howden教授是Phathom Pharmaceuticals的顾问/演讲者,RedHill Biopharma的顾问/演讲者,Meridian Diagnostics的顾问/演讲者,Sebela/Braintree的顾问和ISOThrive的顾问。他有EndoStim的股票期权。Loomba教授担任Aardvark Therapeutics、Altimmune、Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals、AstraZeneca、Cascade Pharmaceuticals、Eli Lilly、Gilead、Glympse bio、Inipharma、Intercept、Inventiva、Ionis、Janssen Inc.、Lipidio、Madrigal、Neurobo、Novo Nordisk、Merck、Pfizer、Sagimet、89 bio、Takeda、Terns Pharmaceuticals和Viking Therapeutics的顾问。他拥有Sagimet生物科学公司的股票期权。此外,他的机构还获得了Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals、AstraZeneca、Boehringer Ingelheim、Bristol-Myers Squibb、Eli Lilly、Galectin Therapeutics、Gilead、Intercept、Hanmi、Intercept、Inventiva、Ionis、Janssen、Madrigal Pharmaceuticals、Merck、Novo Nordisk、Pfizer、Sonic Incytes和Terns Pharmaceuticals的研究资助。他也是LipoNexus Inc.的联合创始人。Dusheiko教授在Aligos、Arbutus、葛兰素史克、Janssen和Gilead的独立数据安全监测委员会任职。在过去的两年中,他获得了Arbutus, Antios, Aligos和Gilead Sciences的荣誉,并担任新加坡国家医学研究委员会的顾问;TherVacB联盟(欧洲地平线基金);和A-Tango联盟(EUH2020资助)。g.l.h教授。Wong教授曾担任阿斯利康(AstraZeneca)、Barinthus biotheraptics、Gilead Sciences、葛兰素史克(GlaxoSmithKline)、杨森(Janssen)和Virion的咨询委员会成员;曾担任Abbott, AbbVie, Ascletis Pharmaceuticals, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Echosens, Ferring, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen和Roche的演讲者;并获得了吉利德科学公司的研究资助。dr . B. Gearry教授是AbbVie、Janssen、Schering-Plough、Zespri、Baxter和Celltrion的顾问委员会成员。他曾获得艾伯维(AbbVie)、杨森(Janssen)、先灵葆雅(Schering Plough)、Zespri、Ferring和Celltrion的酬金或旅行补助金。他曾获得艾伯维(AbbVie)、杨森(Janssen)、古德曼-菲尔德(Goodman-Fielder)、康维塔(Comvita)和泽斯普(Zespri)的研究者发起的研究资助。S. Subramanian博士是Abbvie、Bristol-Myers Squibb、Celltrion、Dr. Falk Pharmaceuticals、Lilly、Ipsen、Janssen、Eisat和Takeda的发言人,并获得了Abbvie、Janssen和Takeda的教育资助,并且是Abbvie、Celltrion、Dr. Falk Pharmaceuticals、Janssen、Takeda和Vifor Pharmaceuticals的顾问委员会成员。Tye-Din教授曾私下或通过他的研究所担任Anatara、Anokion、Barinthus Biotherapeutics、Chugai Pharmaceuticals、DBV Technologies、Dr. Falk、EVOQ Therapeutics、Equillium、Forte Biosciences、IM Therapeutics、Janssen、Kallyope、Mozart Therapeutics、Sonoma biotheraptherapeutics、Takeda、TEVA和Topas的顾问或顾问委员会成员。他获得了Barinthus biotheraptics、Chugai Pharmaceuticals、Codexis、DBV Technologies、EVOQ Therapeutics、Immunic、Kallyope、Novoviah Pharmaceuticals、Topas和Tillotts Pharmaceuticals的研究资助。他是有关在乳糜泻诊断和治疗中使用谷蛋白肽的专利的发明人。P. J. Trivedi教授,副主编Trivedi博士获得了伯明翰国家卫生与社会保健研究所(NIHR)的机构资助。他还获得了Advanz/Intercept、Albireo/Ipsen、Dr. Falk Pharma、Perspectum Ltd.和Zambon的演讲费。他获得了Advanz/Intercept、Albireo/Ipsen、ChemoMab、Cymabay/Gilead、Dr. Falk、GSK、Kowa、Mirum和Pliant的咨询费,并获得了Bristol Myers Squibb、Core (Guts uk)、EASL、Gilead Sciences、GSK、Intercept、Ipsen、LifeArc、Medical Research Foundation (uk)、Mirum、NIHR、PSC support、Regeneron和The Wellcome Trust的资助支持。Dr. Q. Huang,副主编,曾担任Gilead和Roche的顾问委员会成员。t·r·卡德教授,副主编无人申报。C. J. Black博士,副主编。 福克和艾伯维,并获得了福克博士和Viatris的旅行资助。他曾担任FW Medical的顾问,并获得了GE Healthcare的研究资助。R. E. Pounder教授,创始编辑1987<e:1> - 2017;2018年荣誉编辑和顾问无申报。如果编辑与稿件内容有潜在的利益冲突,通常该稿件将被转移给另一位编辑。偶尔,由于某些手稿的专业性和其他编辑的经验有限,手稿可能仍由原专业编辑监督,他在作出决定之前会与其他编辑协商2025年11月
{"title":"AP&T: Editors' Declarations of Interest","authors":"","doi":"10.1111/apt.70468","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.70468","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;\u0000 &lt;b&gt;\u0000 &lt;i&gt;Professor C. W. Howden, Editor&lt;/i&gt;\u0000 &lt;/b&gt;\u0000 &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Professor Howden is a consultant/speaker for Phathom Pharmaceuticals, consultant/speaker for RedHill Biopharma, consultant/speaker for Meridian Diagnostics, consultant for Sebela/Braintree and consultant for ISOThrive. He has stock options in EndoStim.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;\u0000 &lt;b&gt;\u0000 &lt;i&gt;Professor R. Loomba, Editor&lt;/i&gt;\u0000 &lt;/b&gt;\u0000 &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Professor Loomba serves as a consultant to Aardvark Therapeutics, Altimmune, Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca, Cascade Pharmaceuticals, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Glympse bio, Inipharma, Intercept, Inventiva, Ionis, Janssen Inc., Lipidio, Madrigal, Neurobo, Novo Nordisk, Merck, Pfizer, Sagimet, 89 bio, Takeda, Terns Pharmaceuticals and Viking Therapeutics. He has stock options in Sagimet biosciences. In addition, his institution received research grants from Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Galectin Therapeutics, Gilead, Intercept, Hanmi, Intercept, Inventiva, Ionis, Janssen, Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Merck, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Sonic Incytes and Terns Pharmaceuticals. He is also the co-founder of LipoNexus Inc.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;\u0000 &lt;b&gt;\u0000 &lt;i&gt;Professor G. M. Dusheiko, Associate Editor&lt;/i&gt;\u0000 &lt;/b&gt;\u0000 &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Professor Dusheiko serves on independent data safety monitoring boards for Aligos, Arbutus, Glaxo Smith Kline, Janssen and Gilead. In the past two years, he has received honoraria from Arbutus, Antios, Aligos and Gilead Sciences, and he serves as an advisor to the National Medical Research Council, Singapore; the TherVacB Consortium (European Horizon Grant); and the A-Tango Consortium (EUH2020 grant).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;\u0000 &lt;b&gt;\u0000 &lt;i&gt;Professor G. L.-H. Wong, Associate Editor&lt;/i&gt;\u0000 &lt;/b&gt;\u0000 &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Professor Wong has served as an advisory committee member for AstraZeneca, Barinthus Biotherapeutics, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen and Virion; has served as a speaker for Abbott, AbbVie, Ascletis Pharmaceuticals, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Echosens, Ferring, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen and Roche; and has received research grants from Gilead Sciences.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;\u0000 &lt;b&gt;\u0000 &lt;i&gt;Professor R. B. Gearry, Associate Editor&lt;/i&gt;\u0000 &lt;/b&gt;\u0000 &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Professor Gearry is, or has been, a member of advisory boards for AbbVie, Janssen, Schering-Plough, Zespri, Baxter and Celltrion. He has received honoraria or travel grants from AbbVie, Janssen, Schering Plough, Zespri, Ferring and Celltrion. He has received research grants for investigator-initiated studies from AbbVie, Janssen, Goodman-Fielder, Comvita and Zespri.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;\u0000 &lt;b&gt;\u0000 &lt;i&gt;Dr. S. Subramanian, Associate Editor&lt;/i&gt;\u0000 &lt;/b&gt;\u0000 &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Dr. Subramanian is/has been on the speaker bureau for Abbvie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celltrio","PeriodicalId":121,"journal":{"name":"Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics","volume":"63 1","pages":"6-7"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7,"publicationDate":"2025-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/apt.70468","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145706531","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Editorial: MetALD and Risk of Gastrointestinal Cancer-What Can We Learn From Japan? Authors' Reply. 社论:金属d与胃肠道癌症的风险-我们能从日本学到什么?作者的回答。
IF 7.6 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-07 DOI: 10.1111/apt.70489
Nobuharu Tamaki,Takefumi Kimura,Shun-Ichi Wakabayashi,Masayuki Kurosaki
{"title":"Editorial: MetALD and Risk of Gastrointestinal Cancer-What Can We Learn From Japan? Authors' Reply.","authors":"Nobuharu Tamaki,Takefumi Kimura,Shun-Ichi Wakabayashi,Masayuki Kurosaki","doi":"10.1111/apt.70489","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.70489","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":121,"journal":{"name":"Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics","volume":"372 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145696653","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Letter on ‘Meta-Analysis: Mortality Trends and Risk Factors in Severe Alcohol-Associated Hepatitis’—Authors' Reply 关于“荟萃分析:严重酒精相关性肝炎的死亡率趋势和危险因素”的信函——作者回复。
IF 6.7 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-07 DOI: 10.1111/apt.70488
Francisco Idalsoaga, Luis Antonio Díaz, Stephen Hoang, Mohammad Qasim Khan, Juan Pablo Arab
<p>We thank Zhao for his thoughtful letter regarding our meta-analysis of short-term mortality in severe alcohol-associated hepatitis (sAH) [<span>1</span>]. Our primary objective was to estimate pooled mortality at 28, 60 and 90 days and to assess temporal trends and risk factors for short-term mortality in sAH. We found high mortality, with 90-day mortality of 43.7% (95% CI: 34.6–53.3). Therefore, our study confirmed that sAH confers a high risk of mortality, without statistically credible improvement in recent decades [<span>2</span>]. However, we respectfully disagree with some aspects mentioned as potential limitations.</p><p>It was argued that the structural heterogeneity of ‘standard care’ invalidates our decade-based time-trend analyses. Since the landmark Maddrey study in 1978 [<span>3</span>], corticosteroids have been widely used as the only therapy with demonstrated benefit in sAH [<span>4</span>]. In our dataset, only one early study used diet as a comparator, whereas most trials employed a placebo. The use of ‘prophylactic antibiotics’ as standard care is also incorrect, as no mortality benefit has been shown, and none of the included studies used antibiotics as a control arm. We acknowledge that control arm definitions evolved across decades, reflecting advances in supportive care, and that this heterogeneity complicates temporal comparisons. Despite this, the lack of improvement in 90-day mortality across recent decades, where standards of care are more comparable, remains concerning. Moreover, the statement of ‘no statistically credible improvement’ refers to decade-wise comparisons from the 1980s onward, where 95% credible intervals largely overlap.</p><p>Regarding model selection, we agree that follow-up time is biologically expected to correlate with mortality; this is why it was pre-specified as a key covariate. The role of the meta-regression was not to ‘discover’ that longer follow-up increases deaths, but to separate horizon effects from calendar-time or treatment-era effects in single-arm pooled data. In this framework, publication year did not provide additional explanatory power once follow-up was accounted for, and the AIC-guided choice of a parsimonious model was used to avoid overfitting sparse and heterogeneous study-level covariates. However, our complementary Bayesian analyses examining mortality across decades show overlapping credible intervals from the 1980s onward, supporting the overall finding that progress has plateaued despite four decades of advancing supportive care.</p><p>The robustness of the MELD–mortality association was also questioned. We acknowledge limitations due to missing data and reporting bias, and therefore classified all meta-regressions as exploratory and downgraded certainty using a GRADE-based approach. Nevertheless, the positive association observed is consistent with large contemporary cohorts in which MELD shows superior prognostic performance over mDF [<span>5, 6</span>]. Finally, w
我们感谢Zhao对我们关于严重酒精相关性肝炎(sAH) bbb短期死亡率的荟萃分析的深思熟虑的来信。我们的主要目的是估计28,60和90天的总死亡率,并评估sAH短期死亡率的时间趋势和危险因素。我们发现高死亡率,90天死亡率为43.7% (95% CI: 34.6-53.3)。因此,我们的研究证实,sAH具有较高的死亡率,近几十年来没有统计学上可信的改善[10]。然而,我们恭敬地不同意提到的潜在限制的某些方面。有人认为,“标准护理”的结构异质性使我们基于十年的时间趋势分析无效。自1978年具有里程碑意义的Maddrey研究[3]以来,皮质类固醇已被广泛用作唯一证明对sAH[3]有益的治疗方法。在我们的数据集中,只有一项早期研究使用饮食作为比较物,而大多数试验使用安慰剂。使用“预防性抗生素”作为标准治疗也是不正确的,因为没有显示出死亡率的好处,而且纳入的研究都没有使用抗生素作为对照组。我们承认,控制组的定义几十年来不断演变,反映了支持治疗的进步,这种异质性使时间比较复杂化。尽管如此,近几十年来,90天死亡率缺乏改善,而护理标准更具可比性,这仍然令人担忧。此外,“没有统计上可信的改善”的说法指的是自20世纪80年代以来的十年比较,其中95%的可信区间基本上重叠。关于模型选择,我们同意随访时间在生物学上预期与死亡率相关;这就是为什么它被预先指定为关键协变量的原因。meta回归的作用不是“发现”更长随访期会增加死亡率,而是在单臂汇总数据中将水平效应与日历时间效应或治疗时代效应分开。在这个框架中,一旦考虑到随访,出版年份并没有提供额外的解释力,并且使用aic指导的简约模型的选择来避免过拟合稀疏和异质性的研究水平协变量。然而,我们对数十年间死亡率的补充贝叶斯分析显示,自20世纪80年代以来,死亡率的可信区间存在重叠,这支持了总体发现,即尽管40年来支持性护理得到了发展,但进展仍处于停滞状态。meld -死亡率关联的稳健性也受到质疑。我们承认由于数据缺失和报告偏倚造成的局限性,因此使用基于grade的方法将所有元回归分类为探索性和降级确定性。然而,观察到的正相关与当代大型队列一致,其中MELD表现出优于mDF的预后表现[5,6]。最后,我们同意时代分层和网络荟萃分析方法是有吸引力的,可以进一步澄清不断发展的标准护理、早期肝移植、感染预防和酒精使用障碍(AUD)管理的影响。然而,目前的文献受到报告稀疏、异质比较和结果时间点不一致的限制,这限制了我们采用保守策略。因此,我们认为中心信息保持不变:sAH的死亡率仍然高得令人无法接受,强调需要更有效的治疗[7],标准化报告,更好地整合移植[8]和AUD护理途径[9]。弗朗西斯科·伊达索加:构思,写作-原稿,写作-审查和编辑。路易斯安东尼奥Díaz:写作-审查和编辑。Stephen Hoang:写作-评论和编辑。穆罕默德·卡西姆·汗:写作-评论和编辑。Juan Pablo Arab:写作-评论和编辑。作者没有什么可报告的。作者声明无利益冲突。这篇文章链接到Siddique等人的论文。要查看这些文章,请访问https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.70383和https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.70441.Data,分享不适用于本文,因为在本研究中没有生成或分析数据集。
{"title":"Letter on ‘Meta-Analysis: Mortality Trends and Risk Factors in Severe Alcohol-Associated Hepatitis’—Authors' Reply","authors":"Francisco Idalsoaga,&nbsp;Luis Antonio Díaz,&nbsp;Stephen Hoang,&nbsp;Mohammad Qasim Khan,&nbsp;Juan Pablo Arab","doi":"10.1111/apt.70488","DOIUrl":"10.1111/apt.70488","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;We thank Zhao for his thoughtful letter regarding our meta-analysis of short-term mortality in severe alcohol-associated hepatitis (sAH) [&lt;span&gt;1&lt;/span&gt;]. Our primary objective was to estimate pooled mortality at 28, 60 and 90 days and to assess temporal trends and risk factors for short-term mortality in sAH. We found high mortality, with 90-day mortality of 43.7% (95% CI: 34.6–53.3). Therefore, our study confirmed that sAH confers a high risk of mortality, without statistically credible improvement in recent decades [&lt;span&gt;2&lt;/span&gt;]. However, we respectfully disagree with some aspects mentioned as potential limitations.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It was argued that the structural heterogeneity of ‘standard care’ invalidates our decade-based time-trend analyses. Since the landmark Maddrey study in 1978 [&lt;span&gt;3&lt;/span&gt;], corticosteroids have been widely used as the only therapy with demonstrated benefit in sAH [&lt;span&gt;4&lt;/span&gt;]. In our dataset, only one early study used diet as a comparator, whereas most trials employed a placebo. The use of ‘prophylactic antibiotics’ as standard care is also incorrect, as no mortality benefit has been shown, and none of the included studies used antibiotics as a control arm. We acknowledge that control arm definitions evolved across decades, reflecting advances in supportive care, and that this heterogeneity complicates temporal comparisons. Despite this, the lack of improvement in 90-day mortality across recent decades, where standards of care are more comparable, remains concerning. Moreover, the statement of ‘no statistically credible improvement’ refers to decade-wise comparisons from the 1980s onward, where 95% credible intervals largely overlap.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Regarding model selection, we agree that follow-up time is biologically expected to correlate with mortality; this is why it was pre-specified as a key covariate. The role of the meta-regression was not to ‘discover’ that longer follow-up increases deaths, but to separate horizon effects from calendar-time or treatment-era effects in single-arm pooled data. In this framework, publication year did not provide additional explanatory power once follow-up was accounted for, and the AIC-guided choice of a parsimonious model was used to avoid overfitting sparse and heterogeneous study-level covariates. However, our complementary Bayesian analyses examining mortality across decades show overlapping credible intervals from the 1980s onward, supporting the overall finding that progress has plateaued despite four decades of advancing supportive care.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The robustness of the MELD–mortality association was also questioned. We acknowledge limitations due to missing data and reporting bias, and therefore classified all meta-regressions as exploratory and downgraded certainty using a GRADE-based approach. Nevertheless, the positive association observed is consistent with large contemporary cohorts in which MELD shows superior prognostic performance over mDF [&lt;span&gt;5, 6&lt;/span&gt;]. Finally, w","PeriodicalId":121,"journal":{"name":"Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics","volume":"63 2","pages":"316-317"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7,"publicationDate":"2025-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/apt.70488","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145696655","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Editorial: MetALD and Risk of Gastrointestinal Cancer-What Can We Learn From Japan? 社论:金属d与胃肠道癌症的风险-我们能从日本学到什么?
IF 7.6 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-07 DOI: 10.1111/apt.70477
Hannes Hagström,Ying Shang
{"title":"Editorial: MetALD and Risk of Gastrointestinal Cancer-What Can We Learn From Japan?","authors":"Hannes Hagström,Ying Shang","doi":"10.1111/apt.70477","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.70477","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":121,"journal":{"name":"Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145696688","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Letter: Putting Crohn's Risk Prediction to Work in Perianal Fistula—Calibration, Thresholds, and Transport 信:将克罗恩风险预测应用于肛周瘘管的校准、阈值和运输
IF 7.6 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-05 DOI: 10.1111/apt.70464
Emmanuel Pio Pastore
{"title":"Letter: Putting Crohn's Risk Prediction to Work in Perianal Fistula—Calibration, Thresholds, and Transport","authors":"Emmanuel Pio Pastore","doi":"10.1111/apt.70464","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.70464","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":121,"journal":{"name":"Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics","volume":"203 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145673960","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Serum Villin-1-A Novel Marker of Gut Barrier Damage in Acutely Decompensated Cirrhosis: A Cohort Study and Validation. 血清绒毛蛋白-1——急性失代偿肝硬化中肠道屏障损伤的新标志物:一项队列研究和验证。
IF 7.6 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-03 DOI: 10.1111/apt.70481
David Tornai,Boglarka Balogh,Aniko Csillag,Andras Budai,Andras Kiss,Peter Antal-Szalmas,Gabor Mehes,Lukacs Barath,Tamas Tornai,Istvan Tornai,Zsuzsanna Vitalis,Nora Sipeki,Tamas Dinya,Attila Enyedi,Florian A Rosenberger,Wim Laleman,Minneke J Coenraad,Ferran Aguilar,Joan Claria,Richard Moreau,Jonel Trebicka,Maria Papp,
BACKGROUNDGut barrier dysfunction contributes to acute decompensation (AD) of cirrhosis progression but, it is not acknowledged in severity or prognostic scores due to a lack of appropriate assessment tools.AIMWe investigated serum villin-1 (VIL1), an epithelial brush-border associated actin-binding protein, as a non-invasive marker for gut injury and prognosis in AD cirrhosis.METHODSSerum VIL1 was measured in 338 cirrhosis patients (discovery n = 130, validation n = 208, including acute-on-chronic liver failure [ACLF]) from MICROB-PREDICT cohorts and 50 healthy controls (HC). Duodenal biopsies (n = 49 patients, n = 11 HC) were assessed for tissue VIL1 via immunohistochemistry. Serum cytokine profiling linked serum VIL1 levels to systemic inflammation.RESULTSCompared to HC, both serum and tissue VIL1 levels were lower in stable AD patients. However, serum VIL1 progressively increased with AD severity, peaking in ACLF. Serum VIL1 was associated with 90-day mortality (AUROC: 0.721, p < 0.001; similar to MELD: 0.722, p < 0.001). A cut-off > 12.79 ng/mL enhanced the prognostic accuracy provided by severe disease stage, defined as CLIF-C AD score ≥ 50 or ACLF (low VIL1: 17.5% vs. high VIL1: 53.6% mortality). This threshold was associated with increased systemic inflammation, suggesting enhanced bacterial translocation. VIL1 was an independent predictor of 90-day mortality (HR: 2.52, CI: 1.648-3.848, p < 0.001) in Cox regression. All findings were confirmed in the validation cohort.CONCLUSIONSerum VIL1 is a non-invasive indicator of gut barrier damage and short-term mortality in AD cirrhosis. Incorporating VIL1 assessment into risk stratification methods improves prognostic accuracy by capturing an essential, yet previously overlooked component of disease progression.
背景:肠道屏障功能障碍有助于肝硬化进展的急性失代偿(AD),但由于缺乏适当的评估工具,在严重程度或预后评分中尚未得到承认。我们研究了血清绒毛蛋白-1 (VIL1),一种上皮刷缘相关肌动蛋白结合蛋白,作为AD肝硬化患者肠道损伤和预后的非侵入性标志物。方法对来自MICROB-PREDICT队列的338例肝硬化患者(新发现n = 130,验证n = 208,包括急性慢性肝衰竭[ACLF])和50例健康对照(HC)的血清VIL1进行检测。十二指肠活检(n = 49例,n = 11例HC)通过免疫组织化学评估组织VIL1。血清细胞因子分析将血清VIL1水平与全身性炎症联系起来。结果与HC相比,稳定AD患者血清和组织VIL1水平均较低。然而,血清VIL1随着AD的严重程度逐渐升高,在ACLF时达到峰值。血清VIL1与90天死亡率相关(AUROC: 0.721, p 12.79 ng/mL)提高了严重疾病分期(定义为cliff - c AD评分≥50或ACLF)提供的预后准确性(低VIL1: 17.5% vs高VIL1: 53.6%死亡率)。这一阈值与全身性炎症增加有关,表明细菌易位增强。在Cox回归中,VIL1是90天死亡率的独立预测因子(HR: 2.52, CI: 1.648 ~ 3.848, p < 0.001)。所有结果在验证队列中得到证实。结论血清VIL1是衡量AD肝硬化患者肠道屏障损伤和短期死亡率的无创指标。将VIL1评估纳入风险分层方法,通过捕获疾病进展的一个重要但以前被忽视的组成部分,提高了预后准确性。
{"title":"Serum Villin-1-A Novel Marker of Gut Barrier Damage in Acutely Decompensated Cirrhosis: A Cohort Study and Validation.","authors":"David Tornai,Boglarka Balogh,Aniko Csillag,Andras Budai,Andras Kiss,Peter Antal-Szalmas,Gabor Mehes,Lukacs Barath,Tamas Tornai,Istvan Tornai,Zsuzsanna Vitalis,Nora Sipeki,Tamas Dinya,Attila Enyedi,Florian A Rosenberger,Wim Laleman,Minneke J Coenraad,Ferran Aguilar,Joan Claria,Richard Moreau,Jonel Trebicka,Maria Papp, ","doi":"10.1111/apt.70481","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.70481","url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUNDGut barrier dysfunction contributes to acute decompensation (AD) of cirrhosis progression but, it is not acknowledged in severity or prognostic scores due to a lack of appropriate assessment tools.AIMWe investigated serum villin-1 (VIL1), an epithelial brush-border associated actin-binding protein, as a non-invasive marker for gut injury and prognosis in AD cirrhosis.METHODSSerum VIL1 was measured in 338 cirrhosis patients (discovery n = 130, validation n = 208, including acute-on-chronic liver failure [ACLF]) from MICROB-PREDICT cohorts and 50 healthy controls (HC). Duodenal biopsies (n = 49 patients, n = 11 HC) were assessed for tissue VIL1 via immunohistochemistry. Serum cytokine profiling linked serum VIL1 levels to systemic inflammation.RESULTSCompared to HC, both serum and tissue VIL1 levels were lower in stable AD patients. However, serum VIL1 progressively increased with AD severity, peaking in ACLF. Serum VIL1 was associated with 90-day mortality (AUROC: 0.721, p < 0.001; similar to MELD: 0.722, p < 0.001). A cut-off > 12.79 ng/mL enhanced the prognostic accuracy provided by severe disease stage, defined as CLIF-C AD score ≥ 50 or ACLF (low VIL1: 17.5% vs. high VIL1: 53.6% mortality). This threshold was associated with increased systemic inflammation, suggesting enhanced bacterial translocation. VIL1 was an independent predictor of 90-day mortality (HR: 2.52, CI: 1.648-3.848, p < 0.001) in Cox regression. All findings were confirmed in the validation cohort.CONCLUSIONSerum VIL1 is a non-invasive indicator of gut barrier damage and short-term mortality in AD cirrhosis. Incorporating VIL1 assessment into risk stratification methods improves prognostic accuracy by capturing an essential, yet previously overlooked component of disease progression.","PeriodicalId":121,"journal":{"name":"Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics","volume":"113 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145664036","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Editorial for ‘Review Article: Extending the Frontiers of Intestinal Ultrasound Knowledge, Performance, and Expansion’ 评论文章:扩展肠道超声知识、性能和扩展的前沿
IF 6.7 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-02 DOI: 10.1111/apt.70484
Cameron Kendall, Akhilesh Swaminathan
<p>The treat-to-target approach in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) emphasises the importance of serial, non-invasive monitoring of disease activity that can be achieved by using a range of modalities [<span>1</span>]. Among these, intestinal ultrasound (IUS) shows promise by virtue of its potential for seamless integration into routine clinic appointments, relatively low cost, repeatability and high patient approval [<span>2</span>]. Despite these advantages, global uptake of IUS has been hampered by several factors, one of which includes concerns around the relatively smaller evidence base for IUS for assessment of IBD in comparison to traditional modalities such as magnetic resonance enterography (MRE), ileocolonoscopy and blood and faecal biomarkers. We read with interest the recent article by Lu et al. [<span>3</span>] which provided a high-level overview of the current state of IUS research while highlighting gaps in the current literature.</p><p>There has been an explosion of interest in IUS in recent years [<span>4</span>]. Consequently, there are now a multitude of sonographic techniques and scoring systems [<span>5</span>] that have been developed for clinical use. Lu et al. [<span>3</span>] highlighted the lack of international consensus regarding the optimal use of these indices, especially in relation to monitoring disease response to IBD medications, the assessment of intestinal segments post-resection, and in the assessment of paediatric populations who may benefit significantly from the non-invasive nature of IUS. Additionally, the available IUS indices need to be refined for easy bedside use, demonstrate inter- and intra-operator reliability, and be easily interpreted by different clinicians—which includes ongoing validation in comparison to ileocolonoscopy, MRE and capsule endoscopy. Optimal clinical use of IUS will also be dependent on the synergy of this modality with other non-invasive measures of IBD such as faecal and blood biomarkers, which best reflect real-world practice. The utility of combining these assessment tools for predicting the longitudinal trajectory of IBD also remains unanswered.</p><p>Given the growing burden of IBD worldwide [<span>6</span>], there needs to be ongoing consideration for the use of cost-effective and sustainable modalities for IBD assessment. Thus, additional avenues for ongoing research should consider the reproducibility of IUS indices/assessment from handheld devices to high-end machines [<span>7</span>], and alignment and optimisation of training pathways worldwide. Ongoing endeavours in this space are underway through organisations such as the International Bowel Ultrasound Group (IBUS), the Gastrointestinal Network of Intestinal Ultrasound (GENIUS) and the Intestinal Ultrasound Group of the United States and Canada (iUSCAN).</p><p>There is little doubt that IUS holds a valuable and growing role in IBD assessment. Its full potential will probably be apparent once it is integrated alongs
炎症性肠病(IBD)的“从治疗到靶向”方法强调了对疾病活动进行系列、非侵入性监测的重要性,这种监测可以通过使用一系列模式来实现。其中,肠道超声(IUS)凭借其无缝整合到常规临床预约的潜力,相对较低的成本,可重复性和高患者认可率显示出前景。尽管有这些优势,但全球对IUS的吸收受到几个因素的阻碍,其中一个因素包括与磁共振肠造影(MRE)、回肠结肠镜检查以及血液和粪便生物标志物等传统方法相比,IUS用于IBD评估的证据基础相对较小。我们饶有兴趣地阅读了Lu等人最近发表的一篇文章,该文章对IUS研究的现状进行了高层次的概述,同时强调了当前文献中的空白。近年来,人们对国际货币基金组织的兴趣呈爆炸式增长。因此,现在有许多超声技术和评分系统[5]已经开发用于临床。Lu等人强调了这些指标的最佳使用缺乏国际共识,特别是在监测疾病对IBD药物的反应、肠切除术后肠段的评估以及评估可能从IUS的非侵入性中显著受益的儿科人群方面。此外,现有的IUS指数需要改进,以方便床边使用,证明操作者之间和操作者内部的可靠性,并易于不同临床医生解释,这包括与回肠结肠镜、MRE和胶囊内窥镜相比的持续验证。IUS的最佳临床使用也将取决于这种方式与其他非侵入性IBD措施(如粪便和血液生物标志物)的协同作用,这些措施最能反映现实世界的实践。结合这些评估工具来预测IBD纵向轨迹的效用仍然没有答案。鉴于IBD在全球范围内的负担日益加重,需要持续考虑使用具有成本效益和可持续的IBD评估模式。因此,正在进行的研究的其他途径应该考虑从手持设备到高端机器的IUS指数/评估的可重复性,以及全球培训途径的对齐和优化。国际肠道超声组(IBUS)、肠道超声胃肠道网络(GENIUS)和美国和加拿大肠道超声组(iUSCAN)等组织正在进行这一领域的持续努力。毫无疑问,IUS在IBD评估中发挥着越来越重要的作用。一旦与IBD活动和预后的其他临床和非侵入性措施结合起来,它的全部潜力可能会显现出来。本综述及时概述了IUS领域的现状,并强调了在未来研究中需要解决的研究空白。卡梅隆肯德尔:概念化,写作-原始草案。Akhilesh Swaminathan:概念化,写作-评论和编辑。作者没有什么可报道的。获得了杨森和Celltrion的教育活动酬金,以及福尔克制药(Dr. Falk Pharma)的旅行援助(与本文无关)。本文链接至Lu等人的论文。要查看这篇文章,请访问https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.70449.Data分享不适用于这篇文章,因为在目前的研究中没有生成或分析数据集。
{"title":"Editorial for ‘Review Article: Extending the Frontiers of Intestinal Ultrasound Knowledge, Performance, and Expansion’","authors":"Cameron Kendall,&nbsp;Akhilesh Swaminathan","doi":"10.1111/apt.70484","DOIUrl":"10.1111/apt.70484","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;The treat-to-target approach in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) emphasises the importance of serial, non-invasive monitoring of disease activity that can be achieved by using a range of modalities [&lt;span&gt;1&lt;/span&gt;]. Among these, intestinal ultrasound (IUS) shows promise by virtue of its potential for seamless integration into routine clinic appointments, relatively low cost, repeatability and high patient approval [&lt;span&gt;2&lt;/span&gt;]. Despite these advantages, global uptake of IUS has been hampered by several factors, one of which includes concerns around the relatively smaller evidence base for IUS for assessment of IBD in comparison to traditional modalities such as magnetic resonance enterography (MRE), ileocolonoscopy and blood and faecal biomarkers. We read with interest the recent article by Lu et al. [&lt;span&gt;3&lt;/span&gt;] which provided a high-level overview of the current state of IUS research while highlighting gaps in the current literature.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;There has been an explosion of interest in IUS in recent years [&lt;span&gt;4&lt;/span&gt;]. Consequently, there are now a multitude of sonographic techniques and scoring systems [&lt;span&gt;5&lt;/span&gt;] that have been developed for clinical use. Lu et al. [&lt;span&gt;3&lt;/span&gt;] highlighted the lack of international consensus regarding the optimal use of these indices, especially in relation to monitoring disease response to IBD medications, the assessment of intestinal segments post-resection, and in the assessment of paediatric populations who may benefit significantly from the non-invasive nature of IUS. Additionally, the available IUS indices need to be refined for easy bedside use, demonstrate inter- and intra-operator reliability, and be easily interpreted by different clinicians—which includes ongoing validation in comparison to ileocolonoscopy, MRE and capsule endoscopy. Optimal clinical use of IUS will also be dependent on the synergy of this modality with other non-invasive measures of IBD such as faecal and blood biomarkers, which best reflect real-world practice. The utility of combining these assessment tools for predicting the longitudinal trajectory of IBD also remains unanswered.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Given the growing burden of IBD worldwide [&lt;span&gt;6&lt;/span&gt;], there needs to be ongoing consideration for the use of cost-effective and sustainable modalities for IBD assessment. Thus, additional avenues for ongoing research should consider the reproducibility of IUS indices/assessment from handheld devices to high-end machines [&lt;span&gt;7&lt;/span&gt;], and alignment and optimisation of training pathways worldwide. Ongoing endeavours in this space are underway through organisations such as the International Bowel Ultrasound Group (IBUS), the Gastrointestinal Network of Intestinal Ultrasound (GENIUS) and the Intestinal Ultrasound Group of the United States and Canada (iUSCAN).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;There is little doubt that IUS holds a valuable and growing role in IBD assessment. Its full potential will probably be apparent once it is integrated alongs","PeriodicalId":121,"journal":{"name":"Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics","volume":"63 3","pages":"437-438"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7,"publicationDate":"2025-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/apt.70484","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145651138","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Intestinal Ultrasound Transmural Healing Was Associated With Improved Long‐Term Outcomes Among Patients With Endoscopic Remission: Results of a Prospective Study 肠道超声经壁愈合与内镜缓解患者的长期预后改善相关:一项前瞻性研究的结果
IF 7.6 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-02 DOI: 10.1111/apt.70479
Clara Yzet, Amélie Plancke, Franck Brazier, Lucien Grados, Elise Derval, Louise Ghilardi, Momar Diouf, Adrien Ollier, Mathurin Fumery
Background STRIDE II guidelines recognise endoscopic healing as a main therapeutic target in Crohn's disease (CD). Nevertheless, transmural healing (TH) could reduce the risk of long‐term complications. Aim To assess the impact of intestinal ultrasound (IUS) TH on CD long‐term among patients with endoscopic healing. Method We conducted a prospective study of consecutive patients with CD who underwent colonoscopy with endoscopic healing (CDEIS < 4) and IUS. IUS TH was defined by a bowel wall thickness < 3 mm without colour Doppler signal. The primary endpoint was CD relapse (drug intensification, initiation of steroid, CD‐related hospitalization or surgery, luminal stricture/fistula or perianal CD). Results We included 93 patients. IUS TH was observed in 73%. No difference in median IBD‐risk score was observed among patients with and without IUS TH (22 (IQR 7–41) vs. 30 (IQR 13–55); p = 0.15). After a median follow‐up of 22.5 months (IQR 19.3–23.7), the cumulative risk of relapse was significantly lower among patients with IUS healing (17% vs. 48%; p = 0.007). The benefit of TH remained when considering only patients with complete endoscopic healing (CDEIS = 0) (12‐month relapse rate, 2% vs. 33%; p = 0.03). The risk of CD‐related hospitalization (3% vs. 16%; p = 0.04) and perianal CD (3% vs. 16%; p = 0.04) were significantly lower among patients with IUS healing. In multivariate analysis, the absence of TH remained the only independent factor associated with CD relapse (hazard ratio 2.6 (1.1–6.2); p = 0.03). Conclusion IUS TH was associated with improved long‐term outcomes with lower risks of CD relapse, hospitalization, and perianal CD.
STRIDE II指南承认内窥镜治疗是克罗恩病(CD)的主要治疗目标。然而,经壁愈合(TH)可以降低长期并发症的风险。目的评估肠超声(IUS) TH对内镜下愈合患者CD的长期影响。方法:我们对连续接受结肠镜检查并内镜下愈合(CDEIS < 4)和IUS的CD患者进行了前瞻性研究。无彩色多普勒信号,肠壁厚度约为3mm。主要终点是乳糜泻复发(药物强化、类固醇开始使用、乳糜泻相关住院或手术、管腔狭窄/瘘管或肛周乳糜泻)。结果纳入93例患者。73%的患者出现TH。在接受和未接受IUS TH治疗的患者中,IBD‐危险评分中位数无差异(22 (IQR 7-41) vs. 30 (IQR 13-55);P = 0.15)。中位随访22.5个月后(IQR为19.3-23.7),IUS愈合患者的累积复发风险显著降低(17% vs. 48%; p = 0.007)。当仅考虑内镜下完全愈合的患者(CDEIS = 0)时,TH的益处仍然存在(12个月复发率,2%对33%;p = 0.03)。在IUS愈合的患者中,与CD相关的住院风险(3%对16%,p = 0.04)和肛周CD(3%对16%,p = 0.04)显著降低。在多变量分析中,缺乏TH仍然是与CD复发相关的唯一独立因素(风险比2.6 (1.1-6.2);P = 0.03)。结论IUS TH可改善长期预后,降低CD复发、住院和肛周CD的风险。
{"title":"Intestinal Ultrasound Transmural Healing Was Associated With Improved Long‐Term Outcomes Among Patients With Endoscopic Remission: Results of a Prospective Study","authors":"Clara Yzet, Amélie Plancke, Franck Brazier, Lucien Grados, Elise Derval, Louise Ghilardi, Momar Diouf, Adrien Ollier, Mathurin Fumery","doi":"10.1111/apt.70479","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.70479","url":null,"abstract":"Background STRIDE II guidelines recognise endoscopic healing as a main therapeutic target in Crohn's disease (CD). Nevertheless, transmural healing (TH) could reduce the risk of long‐term complications. Aim To assess the impact of intestinal ultrasound (IUS) TH on CD long‐term among patients with endoscopic healing. Method We conducted a prospective study of consecutive patients with CD who underwent colonoscopy with endoscopic healing (CDEIS &lt; 4) and IUS. IUS TH was defined by a bowel wall thickness &lt; 3 mm without colour Doppler signal. The primary endpoint was CD relapse (drug intensification, initiation of steroid, CD‐related hospitalization or surgery, luminal stricture/fistula or perianal CD). Results We included 93 patients. IUS TH was observed in 73%. No difference in median IBD‐risk score was observed among patients with and without IUS TH (22 (IQR 7–41) vs. 30 (IQR 13–55); <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.15). After a median follow‐up of 22.5 months (IQR 19.3–23.7), the cumulative risk of relapse was significantly lower among patients with IUS healing (17% vs. 48%; <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.007). The benefit of TH remained when considering only patients with complete endoscopic healing (CDEIS = 0) (12‐month relapse rate, 2% vs. 33%; <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.03). The risk of CD‐related hospitalization (3% vs. 16%; <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.04) and perianal CD (3% vs. 16%; <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.04) were significantly lower among patients with IUS healing. In multivariate analysis, the absence of TH remained the only independent factor associated with CD relapse (hazard ratio 2.6 (1.1–6.2); <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.03). Conclusion IUS TH was associated with improved long‐term outcomes with lower risks of CD relapse, hospitalization, and perianal CD.","PeriodicalId":121,"journal":{"name":"Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics","volume":"603 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145651142","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1