Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-07-01DOI: 10.1080/14760584.2025.2524530
María L Ávila-Agüero, Roberto Debbag, Helena Brenes-Chacón, Jose Brea-Del Castillo, Luiza H Falleiros-Arlant, Alejandra Soriano-Fallas, Carlos N Torres Martínez, Lourdes Dueñas, Abiel H Mascareñas-de Los Santos, Pio Lopez, Mónica Pujadas, Juan P Torres, Xavier Sáez-Llorens, Angela Gentile
{"title":"Advancing Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) prevention in Latin America: updated recommendations from the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society of Latin America (SLIPE) expert group on RSV prevention.","authors":"María L Ávila-Agüero, Roberto Debbag, Helena Brenes-Chacón, Jose Brea-Del Castillo, Luiza H Falleiros-Arlant, Alejandra Soriano-Fallas, Carlos N Torres Martínez, Lourdes Dueñas, Abiel H Mascareñas-de Los Santos, Pio Lopez, Mónica Pujadas, Juan P Torres, Xavier Sáez-Llorens, Angela Gentile","doi":"10.1080/14760584.2025.2524530","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14760584.2025.2524530","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12326,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Vaccines","volume":" ","pages":"578-580"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144474426","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Objective: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of 20-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV20) compared to 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13) and 15-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV15) for prevention of pneumococcal disease in the pediatric population in Greece.
Methods: A published decision-analytic Markov model was adapted from payer perspective, to compare PCV20 (under a 3 + 1 dosing schedule per EMA approval) with PCV13 and PCV15 (both under a 2 + 1 dosing schedule) over a 10-year time horizon. Inputs for epidemiology, serotype coverage, vaccine effectiveness, utilities, and direct medical costs (€2024) were sourced from published literature and official data. Model outcomes included number of invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD), noninvasive hospitalized pneumonia, non-hospitalized pneumonia and otitis media (OM) cases, attributable deaths, costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) for each vaccination strategy and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios for each comparison. Scenario analyses assessed PCV20 in a 2 + 1 schedule per recent national recommendations.
Results: The analysis indicated that, vaccination with PCV20 compared to PCV13 and PCV15 prevents an additional 1,953 and 1,514 cases of IPD 54,956 and 42,069 noninvasive hospitalized and non-hospitalized pneumonia cases, 343,353 and 271,864 OM cases and 1,377 and 987 deaths respectively, resulting in incremental gain of 23,065 (vs PCV13) and 17,118 (vs PCV15) QALYs respectively. The lower number of pneumococcal disease cases with PCV20 compared to PCV13 and PCV15, translated to a reduction in total medical care cost of €249 M vs PCV13 and €192 M vs PCV15 over the modeled time horizon. Scenario analyses showed that PCV20 remained dominant under a 2 + 1 dosing schedule.
Conclusion: Vaccination with PCV20, whether in a 2 + 1 or a 3 + 1 schedule, was estimated to be a dominant vaccination strategy over PCV15 or PCV13 for the prevention of pneumococcal disease in Greek infants, as expansion of serotype coverage prevents additional morbidity and costs.
{"title":"Cost-effectiveness analysis of 20-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV20) to prevent pneumococcal disease in the Greek pediatric population.","authors":"Charalampos Tzanetakos, Ioanna Kokkinaki, Myrto Barmpouni, Vasiliki Kossyvaki, Marina Psarra, Johnna Perdrizet, George Gourzoulidis","doi":"10.1080/14760584.2025.2515596","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14760584.2025.2515596","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of the present study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of 20-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV20) compared to 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13) and 15-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV15) for prevention of pneumococcal disease in the pediatric population in Greece.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A published decision-analytic Markov model was adapted from payer perspective, to compare PCV20 (under a 3 + 1 dosing schedule per EMA approval) with PCV13 and PCV15 (both under a 2 + 1 dosing schedule) over a 10-year time horizon. Inputs for epidemiology, serotype coverage, vaccine effectiveness, utilities, and direct medical costs (€2024) were sourced from published literature and official data. Model outcomes included number of invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD), noninvasive hospitalized pneumonia, non-hospitalized pneumonia and otitis media (OM) cases, attributable deaths, costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) for each vaccination strategy and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios for each comparison. Scenario analyses assessed PCV20 in a 2 + 1 schedule per recent national recommendations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis indicated that, vaccination with PCV20 compared to PCV13 and PCV15 prevents an additional 1,953 and 1,514 cases of IPD 54,956 and 42,069 noninvasive hospitalized and non-hospitalized pneumonia cases, 343,353 and 271,864 OM cases and 1,377 and 987 deaths respectively, resulting in incremental gain of 23,065 (vs PCV13) and 17,118 (vs PCV15) QALYs respectively. The lower number of pneumococcal disease cases with PCV20 compared to PCV13 and PCV15, translated to a reduction in total medical care cost of €249 M vs PCV13 and €192 M vs PCV15 over the modeled time horizon. Scenario analyses showed that PCV20 remained dominant under a 2 + 1 dosing schedule.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Vaccination with PCV20, whether in a 2 + 1 or a 3 + 1 schedule, was estimated to be a dominant vaccination strategy over PCV15 or PCV13 for the prevention of pneumococcal disease in Greek infants, as expansion of serotype coverage prevents additional morbidity and costs.</p>","PeriodicalId":12326,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Vaccines","volume":" ","pages":"486-498"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144208121","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-10-26DOI: 10.1080/14760584.2025.2576243
Ayelén Rojas-Benedicto, Gloria Pérez-Gimeno, Jacobo Mendioroz, Irene Pedrosa Corral, Miriam López Torrijos, Mercedes Rumayor, Mª Angeles Rafael de la Cruz Lopez, Eva Rivas Wagner, MªÁngel Valcárcel de Laiglesia, Inés Guiu Cañete, Ana Fernández Ibañez, Olaia Pérez Martínez, Juan Antonio Linares Dópido, Pello Latasa, Marta Torres-Juan, Mª Jesús Rodríguez Recio, Daniel Castrillejo, Luis Javier Viloria Raymundo, Ninoska López Berrios, Sonia Vázquez-Morón, Susana Monge
Background: We estimated vaccine effectiveness (VE) of the COVID-19 monovalent XBB.1.5 vaccine recommended in Spain in October 2023 for ≥60-year-olds against medically attended COVID-19 and COVID-19 hospitalization, during winter and summer epidemic waves.
Research design and methods: Patients ≥60-year-olds consulting in primary-care or requiring hospitalization due to respiratory infection were systematically RT-PCR tested for SARS-CoV-2 and classified as cases if PCR-positive or controls if PCR-negative. Logistic regression compared autumnal vaccination ≥14 days before onset in cases and controls adjusting for sex, age group, comorbidities, region in Spain and week; VE=(1-Odds Ratio)x100.
Results: We included 1,141/3,286 and 1,386/5,260 cases/controls from primary-care and hospitals. During the winter wave, VE (95% Confidence Interval) was 28% (5;47%) against medically attended COVID-19 [45% (-31;80%) during XBB.1.5 dominance; 26% (-2;46%) during BA.2.86] and 39% (24;51%) against hospitalization [73% (41;89%) during XBB.1.5; 37% (17;48%) during BA.2.86]. During the summer wave, VE decreased; -6% (-33;15%) against infection [21% (-11;44%) during BA.2.86; -39% (-91;-1%) during KP.3] and 6% (-14;22%) against hospitalization [8% (-20;30%) during BA.2.86; 5% (-35;21%) during KP.3].
Conclusions: COVID-19 VE was moderate during the 2023/24 winter wave, higher during XBB.1.5 dominance and against hospitalization. Effectiveness was null during the summer wave, likely reflecting waning immunity and SARS-CoV-2 variant substitution.
{"title":"Effectiveness of the autumnal COVID-19 vaccine dose during the winter and summer waves of the 2023/24 season in Spain.","authors":"Ayelén Rojas-Benedicto, Gloria Pérez-Gimeno, Jacobo Mendioroz, Irene Pedrosa Corral, Miriam López Torrijos, Mercedes Rumayor, Mª Angeles Rafael de la Cruz Lopez, Eva Rivas Wagner, MªÁngel Valcárcel de Laiglesia, Inés Guiu Cañete, Ana Fernández Ibañez, Olaia Pérez Martínez, Juan Antonio Linares Dópido, Pello Latasa, Marta Torres-Juan, Mª Jesús Rodríguez Recio, Daniel Castrillejo, Luis Javier Viloria Raymundo, Ninoska López Berrios, Sonia Vázquez-Morón, Susana Monge","doi":"10.1080/14760584.2025.2576243","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14760584.2025.2576243","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We estimated vaccine effectiveness (VE) of the COVID-19 monovalent XBB.1.5 vaccine recommended in Spain in October 2023 for ≥60-year-olds against medically attended COVID-19 and COVID-19 hospitalization, during winter and summer epidemic waves.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Patients ≥60-year-olds consulting in primary-care or requiring hospitalization due to respiratory infection were systematically RT-PCR tested for SARS-CoV-2 and classified as cases if PCR-positive or controls if PCR-negative. Logistic regression compared autumnal vaccination ≥14 days before onset in cases and controls adjusting for sex, age group, comorbidities, region in Spain and week; VE=(1-Odds Ratio)x100.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 1,141/3,286 and 1,386/5,260 cases/controls from primary-care and hospitals. During the winter wave, VE (95% Confidence Interval) was 28% (5;47%) against medically attended COVID-19 [45% (-31;80%) during XBB.1.5 dominance; 26% (-2;46%) during BA.2.86] and 39% (24;51%) against hospitalization [73% (41;89%) during XBB.1.5; 37% (17;48%) during BA.2.86]. During the summer wave, VE decreased; -6% (-33;15%) against infection [21% (-11;44%) during BA.2.86; -39% (-91;-1%) during KP.3] and 6% (-14;22%) against hospitalization [8% (-20;30%) during BA.2.86; 5% (-35;21%) during KP.3].</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>COVID-19 VE was moderate during the 2023/24 winter wave, higher during XBB.1.5 dominance and against hospitalization. Effectiveness was null during the summer wave, likely reflecting waning immunity and SARS-CoV-2 variant substitution.</p>","PeriodicalId":12326,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Vaccines","volume":" ","pages":"980-990"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145307364","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-10-21DOI: 10.1080/14760584.2025.2576235
Kan Chen, Zhexin Xu, Yi Zhou, Linchen Chu, Hongni Wang, Chuanxi Fu
Background: This study investigates the impact of birth order on influenza vaccination behaviors and intentions among parents of children under 6 years of age, and identifies factors contributing to vaccination disparities to inform targeted strategies for reducing health inequities.
Research design and methods: A national cross-sectional survey was conducted in China (July - August 2024) using stratified sampling, with 3,569 parents of children aged 0-6 completing a questionnaire based on the Determinants of Vaccine Hesitancy Matrix developed by the World Health Organization (WHO-DVH Matrix). Logarithmic regression examined the relationship between age and vaccine hesitancy/vaccination rates. Random forest analysis identified key predictors, while one-way ANOVA examined influencing factors.
Results: Among respondents, 66.9% were first-time parents and 33.1% second-time parents. Vaccination rates for first-born children were lower than those for second-born children before 40 months (64.9% vs. 71.7%, p = 0.022), while vaccine hesitancy was higher among first-time parents before 49 months (58.6% vs. 49.9%, p < 0.001). These differences diminished after age three. Key predictors of vaccination intention included 'Immunization as a social norm' and the 'Reliability of vaccine supply.'
Conclusions: First-time parents demonstrate lower vaccination rates and higher hesitancy to children, particularly before age three, influenced by social norms and vaccine confidence. These findings provide empirical evidence for birth order-based strategies to improve vaccine equity.
背景:本研究调查出生顺序对6岁以下儿童父母流感疫苗接种行为和意图的影响,并确定导致疫苗接种差异的因素,为减少卫生不平等提供有针对性的策略。研究设计和方法:在中国(2024年7月至8月)进行一项分层抽样的全国性横断面调查,共有3569名0-6岁儿童的父母填写了一份基于WHO-DVH矩阵的问卷。对数回归检验了年龄与疫苗犹豫/疫苗接种率之间的关系。随机森林分析确定了关键预测因素,而单因素方差分析检查了影响因素。结果:受访者中66.9%为首次父母,33.1%为第二次父母。40个月前第一胎接种率低于二胎接种率(64.9% vs. 71.7%, p = 0.022), 49个月前第一胎父母的疫苗犹豫率较高(58.6% vs. 49.9%, p)。结论:受社会规范和疫苗信心的影响,第一胎父母对儿童的疫苗接种率较低,对儿童的犹豫率较高,特别是在3岁前。这些发现为基于出生顺序的策略改善疫苗公平性提供了经验证据。
{"title":"Birth order and influenza vaccination: a comparative study of behaviors and intentions between first-time and second-time Chinese parents.","authors":"Kan Chen, Zhexin Xu, Yi Zhou, Linchen Chu, Hongni Wang, Chuanxi Fu","doi":"10.1080/14760584.2025.2576235","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14760584.2025.2576235","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study investigates the impact of birth order on influenza vaccination behaviors and intentions among parents of children under 6 years of age, and identifies factors contributing to vaccination disparities to inform targeted strategies for reducing health inequities.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>A national cross-sectional survey was conducted in China (July - August 2024) using stratified sampling, with 3,569 parents of children aged 0-6 completing a questionnaire based on the Determinants of Vaccine Hesitancy Matrix developed by the World Health Organization (WHO-DVH Matrix). Logarithmic regression examined the relationship between age and vaccine hesitancy/vaccination rates. Random forest analysis identified key predictors, while one-way ANOVA examined influencing factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among respondents, 66.9% were first-time parents and 33.1% second-time parents. Vaccination rates for first-born children were lower than those for second-born children before 40 months (64.9% vs. 71.7%, <i>p</i> = 0.022), while vaccine hesitancy was higher among first-time parents before 49 months (58.6% vs. 49.9%, <i>p</i> < 0.001). These differences diminished after age three. Key predictors of vaccination intention included 'Immunization as a social norm' and the 'Reliability of vaccine supply.'</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>First-time parents demonstrate lower vaccination rates and higher hesitancy to children, particularly before age three, influenced by social norms and vaccine confidence. These findings provide empirical evidence for birth order-based strategies to improve vaccine equity.</p>","PeriodicalId":12326,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Vaccines","volume":" ","pages":"972-979"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145307387","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-11-18DOI: 10.1080/14760584.2025.2589215
Kiran K Rai, Hannah Gowman, Cale S Harrison, David C Gruben, Rebecca Butfield, Rosie Hulme, Hannah R Volkman, Jennifer L Nguyen, Jingyan Yang
Background: The role COVID-19 vaccination on healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and cost remains unclear, especially during Omicron predominance and among high risk UK populations.
Research design and methods: A retrospective cohort study using UK The Health Improvement Network (THIN) primary care data included adults (≥18 years) with confirmed or suspected COVID-19 between September 2022 and May 2023. Three cohorts were defined: Highest risk (eligible for two seasonal doses), High Risk (eligible for one dose), and All COVID-19 patients. Long COVID was identified as ≥1 symptom or diagnostic/referral code, ≥4 weeks post COVID-19 diagnosis. Inverse probability of treatment weighting assessed associations between vaccination status (yes/no and time since vaccination) and long COVID, HCRU, and costs.
Results: In both Risk Cohorts, COVID-19 vaccination was not associated with long COVID incidence. However, in the High Risk (n = 1,889) and All Patients cohorts (n = 8,507) outpatient specialist referrals were significantly lower in the 3-6-month post-vaccination group versus > 6 months (rate ratio: 0.28; 95% CI: 0.10-0.79, p < 0.05 and 0.46; 95% CI: 0.27-0.79; p ≤ 0.01, respectively).
Conclusions: COVID-19 vaccination was not consistently associated with incidence of long COVID or all-cause HCRU. Findings suggest potential subgroup-specific benefits, highlighting the importance of annual vaccination. Further research with larger sample size and longer-term follow-up is warranted.
背景:COVID-19疫苗接种对医疗资源利用(HCRU)和成本的作用尚不清楚,特别是在欧米克隆优势和高危英国人群中。研究设计和方法:一项回顾性队列研究,使用英国健康改善网络(THIN)初级保健数据,包括2022年9月至2023年5月期间确诊或疑似COVID-19的成年人(≥18岁)。定义了三个队列:最高风险(符合两个季节性剂量)、高风险(符合一个剂量)和所有COVID-19患者。长COVID被识别为≥1个症状或诊断/转诊代码,在COVID-19诊断后≥4周。治疗加权的逆概率评估了疫苗接种状态(是否接种和接种后时间)与长COVID、HCRU和成本之间的关联。结果:在两个风险队列中,COVID-19疫苗接种与COVID-19长期发病率无关。然而,在高风险组(n = 1,889)和全患者组(n = 8,507)中,接种疫苗后3-6个月的门诊专科转诊率明显低于接种疫苗后6个月的门诊专科转诊率(比率比:0.28;95% CI: 0.10-0.79, p p≤0.01)。结论:COVID-19疫苗接种与长COVID或全因HCRU的发生率并不一致。研究结果提示潜在的亚组特定益处,强调了每年接种疫苗的重要性。进一步的研究需要更大的样本量和更长期的随访。
{"title":"Understanding the role of COVID-19 vaccination in all-cause healthcare resource utilisation among adults with long COVID in the UK primary care setting: data from the 2022-2023 respiratory virus season.","authors":"Kiran K Rai, Hannah Gowman, Cale S Harrison, David C Gruben, Rebecca Butfield, Rosie Hulme, Hannah R Volkman, Jennifer L Nguyen, Jingyan Yang","doi":"10.1080/14760584.2025.2589215","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14760584.2025.2589215","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The role COVID-19 vaccination on healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and cost remains unclear, especially during Omicron predominance and among high risk UK populations.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study using UK The Health Improvement Network (THIN) primary care data included adults (≥18 years) with confirmed or suspected COVID-19 between September 2022 and May 2023. Three cohorts were defined: Highest risk (eligible for two seasonal doses), High Risk (eligible for one dose), and All COVID-19 patients. Long COVID was identified as ≥1 symptom or diagnostic/referral code, ≥4 weeks post COVID-19 diagnosis. Inverse probability of treatment weighting assessed associations between vaccination status (yes/no and time since vaccination) and long COVID, HCRU, and costs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In both Risk Cohorts, COVID-19 vaccination was not associated with long COVID incidence. However, in the High Risk (<i>n</i> = 1,889) and All Patients cohorts (<i>n</i> = 8,507) outpatient specialist referrals were significantly lower in the 3-6-month post-vaccination group versus > 6 months (rate ratio: 0.28; 95% CI: 0.10-0.79, <i>p</i> < 0.05 and 0.46; 95% CI: 0.27-0.79; <i>p</i> ≤ 0.01, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>COVID-19 vaccination was not consistently associated with incidence of long COVID or all-cause HCRU. Findings suggest potential subgroup-specific benefits, highlighting the importance of annual vaccination. Further research with larger sample size and longer-term follow-up is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":12326,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Vaccines","volume":" ","pages":"1047-1058"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145502910","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-12-04DOI: 10.1080/14760584.2025.2596674
Jean Haensler, Luc Even, Pierre Wils, Fethi Bensaid, Anusha Dias, Hongfeng Deng, Shrirang Karve, Frank DeRosa
Introduction: One of the biggest challenges in the mRNA-LNP vaccine field is product stabilization to overcome the logistical hurdles linked to the ultra-cold distribution chain associated with first-generation mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. Despite recent progress in the field, many R&D efforts remain focused on the development of mRNA-LNP vaccines that would be as stable as liquid formulations for storage at refrigerated or room temperatures.
Areas covered: After an overview of the underlying mechanisms of mRNA-LNP instability, this review provides an update on the different approaches that are currently explored to improve mRNA-LNP thermostability, encompassing mRNA sequence optimization, nucleotide modification and mRNA-LNP design strategies as well as formulation process optimization. Alternative approaches for mRNA-LNP stabilization such as lyophilization, dual-vial formulations and the replacement of water with deep eutectic solvents in the mRNA-LNP process and products are also discussed.
Expert opinion: Achieving robust thermostability of mRNA vaccines will require a multifactorial optimization strategy, integrating advances in sequence engineering, novel formulation designs, buffer composition, excipient selection and manufacturing processes.
{"title":"Not so cold! Improving the thermostability of mRNA vaccines.","authors":"Jean Haensler, Luc Even, Pierre Wils, Fethi Bensaid, Anusha Dias, Hongfeng Deng, Shrirang Karve, Frank DeRosa","doi":"10.1080/14760584.2025.2596674","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14760584.2025.2596674","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>One of the biggest challenges in the mRNA-LNP vaccine field is product stabilization to overcome the logistical hurdles linked to the ultra-cold distribution chain associated with first-generation mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. Despite recent progress in the field, many R&D efforts remain focused on the development of mRNA-LNP vaccines that would be as stable as liquid formulations for storage at refrigerated or room temperatures.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>After an overview of the underlying mechanisms of mRNA-LNP instability, this review provides an update on the different approaches that are currently explored to improve mRNA-LNP thermostability, encompassing mRNA sequence optimization, nucleotide modification and mRNA-LNP design strategies as well as formulation process optimization. Alternative approaches for mRNA-LNP stabilization such as lyophilization, dual-vial formulations and the replacement of water with deep eutectic solvents in the mRNA-LNP process and products are also discussed.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Achieving robust thermostability of mRNA vaccines will require a multifactorial optimization strategy, integrating advances in sequence engineering, novel formulation designs, buffer composition, excipient selection and manufacturing processes.</p>","PeriodicalId":12326,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Vaccines","volume":" ","pages":"1149-1162"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145660822","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-01-15DOI: 10.1080/14760584.2025.2451883
Rano K Sinuraya, Auliya A Suwantika, Maarten J Postma
{"title":"Controlling the COVID-19 pandemic through vaccination: a perspective from Indonesia.","authors":"Rano K Sinuraya, Auliya A Suwantika, Maarten J Postma","doi":"10.1080/14760584.2025.2451883","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14760584.2025.2451883","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12326,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Vaccines","volume":" ","pages":"91-95"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142964427","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-04-07DOI: 10.1080/14760584.2025.2487915
Paolo Bonanni, Michele Conversano, Giancarlo Icardi, Rocco Russo, Alberto Villani
Introduction: Vaccination rates in Italian children must be substantially increased to control the transmission of seasonal influenza and mitigate the associated socio-economic burden. This work aimed to describe strategies to improve the effectiveness and reach of pediatric influenza vaccination campaigns in Italy.
Areas covered: Based on a literature review, influencing factors and potential strategies to enhance vaccination coverage were explored, focusing on settings, logistics, and communication aspects.
Expert opinion: School-based interventions should be deeply implemented in Italy by offering a cost-effective and safe approach to vaccination and successfully overcoming socio-economic and cultural challenges. Scheduled educational programs and institution-supported childhood influenza vaccination awareness campaigns that thoroughly inform about the risk of influenza and its socio-economic consequences, counter vaccine hesitancy, and discuss the benefits of vaccination are desirable, thus concretely prompting all children, families, and healthcare professionals to get vaccinated. Digitalizing procedures could lead to improved adherence by healthcare professionals to immunization programs. Nationwide implementation of these strategies would establish a robust, sustainable system for pediatric influenza vaccination. This would significantly increase childhood vaccination rates, leading to improved disease control and substantially reducing the overall national burden of influenza.
{"title":"Strategies to increase influenza vaccination coverage in the Italian pediatric population: a literature review and expert opinion.","authors":"Paolo Bonanni, Michele Conversano, Giancarlo Icardi, Rocco Russo, Alberto Villani","doi":"10.1080/14760584.2025.2487915","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14760584.2025.2487915","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Vaccination rates in Italian children must be substantially increased to control the transmission of seasonal influenza and mitigate the associated socio-economic burden. This work aimed to describe strategies to improve the effectiveness and reach of pediatric influenza vaccination campaigns in Italy.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>Based on a literature review, influencing factors and potential strategies to enhance vaccination coverage were explored, focusing on settings, logistics, and communication aspects.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>School-based interventions should be deeply implemented in Italy by offering a cost-effective and safe approach to vaccination and successfully overcoming socio-economic and cultural challenges. Scheduled educational programs and institution-supported childhood influenza vaccination awareness campaigns that thoroughly inform about the risk of influenza and its socio-economic consequences, counter vaccine hesitancy, and discuss the benefits of vaccination are desirable, thus concretely prompting all children, families, and healthcare professionals to get vaccinated. Digitalizing procedures could lead to improved adherence by healthcare professionals to immunization programs. Nationwide implementation of these strategies would establish a robust, sustainable system for pediatric influenza vaccination. This would significantly increase childhood vaccination rates, leading to improved disease control and substantially reducing the overall national burden of influenza.</p>","PeriodicalId":12326,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Vaccines","volume":"24 1","pages":"278-288"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143794376","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-05-15DOI: 10.1080/14760584.2025.2505087
Carlos Fernando Mendoza, Jose Luis Huerta, Iustina Chirila, Dania Abreu, Moe H Kyaw, Benjamin Yarnoff
Background: This study evaluated the impact of vaccination strategies using an adapted COVID-19 vaccine in Mexico.
Research design and methods: This study used a previously published combined Markov-decision tree model adapted for the Mexican context. The base case examined the population aged ≥ 65 years and the high-risk population (defined as those with one or more comorbidities associated with high risk of severe disease) aged 12-64 years. Scenario analyses examined lower age cutoffs for eligibility in the standard risk population (≥50 years, ≥18 years, and ≥12 years). Sensitivity analyses varying the parameters by ± 20% was conducted to assess uncertainty.
Results: Compared to no vaccination, the base case was estimated to prevent 1,509,194 cases, 132,166 hospitalizations 24,575 deaths, and 276,223 lost quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), increasing direct costs by $602,446,820 and decreasing societal cost by $2,264,266,271. The ICER was dominant from the societal perspective and $2,181 from the payer perspective, which was cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of 1× GDP per capita ($11,812). The benefits were further increased in scenarios expanding vaccination to additional age groups.
Conclusions: Vaccination strategies targeting a broader age range with an adapted vaccine would result in considerable health and economic benefits and be cost-effective in Mexico.
{"title":"Modeling the potential public health and economic impact and cost-effectiveness of vaccination strategies using an adapted COVID-19 vaccine in Mexico.","authors":"Carlos Fernando Mendoza, Jose Luis Huerta, Iustina Chirila, Dania Abreu, Moe H Kyaw, Benjamin Yarnoff","doi":"10.1080/14760584.2025.2505087","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14760584.2025.2505087","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study evaluated the impact of vaccination strategies using an adapted COVID-19 vaccine in Mexico.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>This study used a previously published combined Markov-decision tree model adapted for the Mexican context. The base case examined the population aged ≥ 65 years and the high-risk population (defined as those with one or more comorbidities associated with high risk of severe disease) aged 12-64 years. Scenario analyses examined lower age cutoffs for eligibility in the standard risk population (≥50 years, ≥18 years, and ≥12 years). Sensitivity analyses varying the parameters by ± 20% was conducted to assess uncertainty.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to no vaccination, the base case was estimated to prevent 1,509,194 cases, 132,166 hospitalizations 24,575 deaths, and 276,223 lost quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), increasing direct costs by $602,446,820 and decreasing societal cost by $2,264,266,271. The ICER was dominant from the societal perspective and $2,181 from the payer perspective, which was cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of 1× GDP per capita ($11,812). The benefits were further increased in scenarios expanding vaccination to additional age groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Vaccination strategies targeting a broader age range with an adapted vaccine would result in considerable health and economic benefits and be cost-effective in Mexico.</p>","PeriodicalId":12326,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Vaccines","volume":" ","pages":"393-402"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144063036","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-01-28DOI: 10.1080/14760584.2025.2459745
Xiang Sun
Introduction: Pertussis poses a significant threat to infants under six months due to their immature immune systems, limited maternal antibody protection, and constraints in the vaccination schedule. Despite vaccination efforts, this group remains highly susceptible to severe complications. Addressing these challenges is crucial for improving the health outcomes of infants in China.
Areas covered: This review examines the primary challenges in preventing pertussis infections among infants under six months in China, focusing on factors such as underdeveloped immune system and inadequate maternal antibody protection. It analyzes limitations in current vaccination strategies and the impact of socio-cultural factors, healthcare resource distribution, and surveillance inadequacies. A comprehensive literature search was conducted to identify potential solutions, including enhancing maternal immunization, adjusting early vaccination strategies, increasing vaccine coverage, and developing new vaccines. The review synthesizes current research findings and data to provide a detailed overview of these issues.
Expert opinion: Infants under six months are particularly vulnerable to pertussis. Early and effective prevention strategies, such as enhanced maternal immunization and adjusted vaccination schedules, are needed. Increasing vaccine coverage and developing safer, more immunogenic vaccines are essential. Policymakers should prioritize these measures to reduce pertussis incidence and complications among infants in China.
{"title":"Dilemma in prevention of pertussis infection among infants under six months in China.","authors":"Xiang Sun","doi":"10.1080/14760584.2025.2459745","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14760584.2025.2459745","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Pertussis poses a significant threat to infants under six months due to their immature immune systems, limited maternal antibody protection, and constraints in the vaccination schedule. Despite vaccination efforts, this group remains highly susceptible to severe complications. Addressing these challenges is crucial for improving the health outcomes of infants in China.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This review examines the primary challenges in preventing pertussis infections among infants under six months in China, focusing on factors such as underdeveloped immune system and inadequate maternal antibody protection. It analyzes limitations in current vaccination strategies and the impact of socio-cultural factors, healthcare resource distribution, and surveillance inadequacies. A comprehensive literature search was conducted to identify potential solutions, including enhancing maternal immunization, adjusting early vaccination strategies, increasing vaccine coverage, and developing new vaccines. The review synthesizes current research findings and data to provide a detailed overview of these issues.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Infants under six months are particularly vulnerable to pertussis. Early and effective prevention strategies, such as enhanced maternal immunization and adjusted vaccination schedules, are needed. Increasing vaccine coverage and developing safer, more immunogenic vaccines are essential. Policymakers should prioritize these measures to reduce pertussis incidence and complications among infants in China.</p>","PeriodicalId":12326,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Vaccines","volume":" ","pages":"138-145"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143046160","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}