首页 > 最新文献

Expert Review of Vaccines最新文献

英文 中文
Cross-neutralization effect of the third dose of inactivated COVID-19 vaccine against the SARS-CoV-2 variants. 第三剂COVID-19灭活疫苗对SARS-CoV-2变体的交叉中和作用
IF 4.8 3区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-02 DOI: 10.1080/14760584.2025.2550984
Yuqing Li, Jiexiao He, Wenqing Liu, Runjie Qi, Jingxin Li, Fengcai Zhu

Background: The ongoing emergence of SARS-CoV-2 variants has raised concerns about the breadth of the immune response provided by existing vaccines.

Research design and methods: In this study, participants aged 18-75 years with no prior COVID-19 infection or vaccination history were enrolled to receive the CoronaVac vaccine. The interval between the first and second vaccine doses was 28 days, while the third dose was given 6 months after the second.

Results: Between February 1 to 15 February 2022, we recruited 40 eligible participants who had not received any COVID-19 vaccination and had no prior COVID-19 infection. After the third dose, neutralizing antibody levels significantly increased against the ancestral strain and certain Omicron variants (BA.1, BA.4/5, BF.7). Compared to levels observed 28 days post-second dose, neutralizing antibody levels rose further 28 days after the third dose, with the GMFI against the ancestral strain at 1.69 (95% CI: 1.27, 2.20). Among other variants, the GMFI against Omicron variants (BA.1, BA.4/5, BF.7) exceeded that for Beta and Delta, with the highest GMFI recorded for the BA.4/5 variant at 4.97 (95% CI: 3.08, 8.05).

Conclusions: The necessity of the third booster dose lies in its ability to enhance the breadth of the immune response.

背景:SARS-CoV-2变体的持续出现引起了人们对现有疫苗提供的免疫反应广度的担忧。研究设计和方法:在本研究中,年龄在18-75岁之间,无COVID-19感染或疫苗接种史的受试者接受CoronaVac疫苗接种。第一次和第二次接种间隔为28天,而第三次接种间隔为第二次接种后6个月。结果:在2022年2月1日至2月15日期间,我们招募了40名未接种任何COVID-19疫苗且先前没有COVID-19感染的符合条件的参与者。在第三次注射后,针对祖先菌株和某些Omicron变体的中和抗体水平显著增加(BA.1, BA.4/5, BF.7)。与第二次注射后28天观察到的水平相比,中和抗体水平在第三次注射后28天进一步上升,对祖先菌株的GMFI为1.69 (95% CI: 1.27, 2.20)。在其他变异中,对Omicron变异(BA.1, BA.4/5, BF.7)的GMFI超过了对Beta和Delta的GMFI,其中BA.4/5变异的GMFI最高,为4.97 (95% CI: 3.08, 8.05)。结论:第三次加强剂的必要性在于它能增强免疫反应的广度。
{"title":"Cross-neutralization effect of the third dose of inactivated COVID-19 vaccine against the SARS-CoV-2 variants.","authors":"Yuqing Li, Jiexiao He, Wenqing Liu, Runjie Qi, Jingxin Li, Fengcai Zhu","doi":"10.1080/14760584.2025.2550984","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14760584.2025.2550984","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The ongoing emergence of SARS-CoV-2 variants has raised concerns about the breadth of the immune response provided by existing vaccines.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>In this study, participants aged 18-75 years with no prior COVID-19 infection or vaccination history were enrolled to receive the CoronaVac vaccine. The interval between the first and second vaccine doses was 28 days, while the third dose was given 6 months after the second.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between February 1 to 15 February 2022, we recruited 40 eligible participants who had not received any COVID-19 vaccination and had no prior COVID-19 infection. After the third dose, neutralizing antibody levels significantly increased against the ancestral strain and certain Omicron variants (BA.1, BA.4/5, BF.7). Compared to levels observed 28 days post-second dose, neutralizing antibody levels rose further 28 days after the third dose, with the GMFI against the ancestral strain at 1.69 (95% CI: 1.27, 2.20). Among other variants, the GMFI against Omicron variants (BA.1, BA.4/5, BF.7) exceeded that for Beta and Delta, with the highest GMFI recorded for the BA.4/5 variant at 4.97 (95% CI: 3.08, 8.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The necessity of the third booster dose lies in its ability to enhance the breadth of the immune response.</p>","PeriodicalId":12326,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Vaccines","volume":"24 1","pages":"840-848"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144948470","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparative effectiveness of Omicron XBB 1.5-adapted COVID-19 vaccines: a systematic literature review and network meta-analysis. omicron XBB 1.5适应COVID-19疫苗的比较有效性:系统文献综述和网络荟萃分析
IF 4.8 3区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-19 DOI: 10.1080/14760584.2025.2505754
Kyle Fahrbach, Allie Cichewicz, Haitao Chu, Manuela Di Fusco, Heather Burnett, Hannah R Volkman, Morodoluwa Akin-Fajiye, Carlos Fernando Mendoza, Joseph C Cappelleri

Introduction: Comparative effectiveness data of COVID-19 vaccines remain limited. We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) feasibility assessment of effectiveness studies of Omicron-adapted COVID-19 vaccines.

Research design and methods: Searches in MEDLINE and Embase up to February 2025 identified studies comparing the effectiveness of Omicron-adapted COVID-19 vaccines, either directly or against no recent vaccine. Two investigators independently selected articles reporting adjusted vaccine effectiveness (VE). A feasibility assessment determined the appropriateness of a common comparator and evaluated effect modifiers (EMs). Data extraction and risk-of-bias assessment were performed by one investigator and validated by a second investigator. Bayesian NMAs using random-effects models were performed for base-case analyses, data permitting.

Results: The review identified 25 studies for Omicron-adapted COVID-19 vaccines: 16 for XBB formulations, eight of which were included in NMAs, all for mRNA formulations, representing 29.9 million participants. BNT162b2 had the largest evidence base. Comparisons between XBB.1.5-adapted BNT162b2 (Comirnaty) and mRNA-1273 (Spikevax) found that both vaccines are effective and comparable against XBB-related hospitalizations, infections, and medically attended visits in adults Among elderly, the estimated effectiveness against XBB-related hospitalizations favored BNT162b2.

Conclusions: Findings of this NMA of observational studies support the effectiveness of XBB.1.5-adapted mRNA vaccines. Limitations included assumptions on EMs and sparse evidence networks.

导言:COVID-19疫苗的比较有效性数据仍然有限。我们对适用于omicron的COVID-19疫苗的有效性研究进行了系统评价和网络荟萃分析(NMA)可行性评估。研究设计和方法:在MEDLINE和Embase中检索到截至2025年2月的研究,确定了比较直接或非近期疫苗的omicron适应COVID-19疫苗有效性的研究。两名研究者独立选择了报告调整后疫苗有效性(VE)的文章。可行性评估确定了通用比较物的适当性,并评估了效果调节剂(EMs)。数据提取和偏倚风险评估由一名研究者进行,并由另一名研究者进行验证。在数据允许的情况下,使用随机效应模型的贝叶斯nma进行基本情况分析。结果:该综述确定了25项针对适用于omicron的COVID-19疫苗的研究:16项针对XBB配方,其中8项纳入nma,均为mRNA配方,代表2990万参与者。BNT162b2的证据基础最大。对xbb .1.5-适应型BNT162b2 (Comirnaty)和mRNA-1273 (Spikevax)的比较发现,这两种疫苗对成人xbb相关住院、感染和医疗就诊均有效且具有可比性。在老年人中,对xbb相关住院的估计有效性倾向于BNT162b2。结论:观察性研究的NMA结果支持xbb .1.5适应mRNA疫苗的有效性。限制包括对EMs和稀疏证据网络的假设。
{"title":"Comparative effectiveness of Omicron XBB 1.5-adapted COVID-19 vaccines: a systematic literature review and network meta-analysis.","authors":"Kyle Fahrbach, Allie Cichewicz, Haitao Chu, Manuela Di Fusco, Heather Burnett, Hannah R Volkman, Morodoluwa Akin-Fajiye, Carlos Fernando Mendoza, Joseph C Cappelleri","doi":"10.1080/14760584.2025.2505754","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14760584.2025.2505754","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Comparative effectiveness data of COVID-19 vaccines remain limited. We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) feasibility assessment of effectiveness studies of Omicron-adapted COVID-19 vaccines.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Searches in MEDLINE and Embase up to February 2025 identified studies comparing the effectiveness of Omicron-adapted COVID-19 vaccines, either directly or against no recent vaccine. Two investigators independently selected articles reporting adjusted vaccine effectiveness (VE). A feasibility assessment determined the appropriateness of a common comparator and evaluated effect modifiers (EMs). Data extraction and risk-of-bias assessment were performed by one investigator and validated by a second investigator. Bayesian NMAs using random-effects models were performed for base-case analyses, data permitting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The review identified 25 studies for Omicron-adapted COVID-19 vaccines: 16 for XBB formulations, eight of which were included in NMAs, all for mRNA formulations, representing 29.9 million participants. BNT162b2 had the largest evidence base. Comparisons between XBB.1.5-adapted BNT162b2 (Comirnaty) and mRNA-1273 (Spikevax) found that both vaccines are effective and comparable against XBB-related hospitalizations, infections, and medically attended visits in adults Among elderly, the estimated effectiveness against XBB-related hospitalizations favored BNT162b2.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings of this NMA of observational studies support the effectiveness of XBB.1.5-adapted mRNA vaccines. Limitations included assumptions on EMs and sparse evidence networks.</p>","PeriodicalId":12326,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Vaccines","volume":" ","pages":"416-432"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144005202","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Immunization information systems' implementation and characteristics across the world: a systematic review of the literature. 免疫信息系统在世界各地的实施和特点:文献的系统回顾。
IF 4.8 3区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-29 DOI: 10.1080/14760584.2025.2510338
Giacomo Pietro Vigezzi, Elena Maggioni, Laura Clavario, Lorenzo Clerico Mosina, Eleonora Raso, Corina Marjin, Andrea Parrini, Matteo Carbone, Simone Fugazza, Alberto Marchisio, Manuela Martella, Giansanto Mosconi, Giuseppina Lo Moro, Fabrizio Bert, Corrado De Vito, Roberta Siliquini, Anna Odone

Introduction: Immunization Information Systems (IISs) are essential public health tools, supporting the management and analysis of vaccination data to aid clinical and strategic decision-making.

Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, this systematic review investigated global state and operational characteristics of IISs. A comprehensive search across multiple databases up to 6th of June 2023, identified 2,612 articles, with 238 included.

Results: A significant increase in IIS research was observed in recent years, with a strong preference (84.5%) for electronic immunization registers (EIRs). Notably, 36% of IISs operate at the national level, and 47.7% meet the U.S. CDC definition, 17.0% are interoperable with personal health records, and 11.7% provide direct access to vaccination data for vaccinees or their guardians. Other key features include automated reminder systems for recipients and providers (12.1%), near real-time or real-time data entry (11.0%), the inclusion of demographic and socioeconomic data (16.7%), and the capacity to document vaccine refusal or hesitancy (10.2%).

Conclusions: IISs contribute to improving population-level surveillance of vaccine-preventable diseases. Persistent limitations related to data standardization, interoperability, and cost-effectiveness evaluation must be addressed. Strengthening these aspects is crucial to fully harness the potential of IISs in various healthcare settings, where enhanced vaccination tracking and targeting are most urgently needed.

免疫信息系统(IISs)是必不可少的公共卫生工具,支持疫苗接种数据的管理和分析,以帮助临床和战略决策。方法:遵循PRISMA指南,本系统综述调查了IISs的整体状态和操作特征。截至2023年6月6日,在多个数据库中进行了全面搜索,确定了2612篇文章,其中238篇被收录。结果:近年来,IIS研究显著增加,其中84.5%的人强烈倾向于电子免疫登记(EIRs)。值得注意的是,36%的IISs在国家层面运行,47.7%符合美国疾病控制与预防中心的定义,17.0%与个人健康记录互操作,11.7%为接种者或其监护人提供直接访问疫苗接种数据的途径。其他主要特征包括接受者和提供者的自动提醒系统(12.1%)、近实时或实时数据输入(11.0%)、纳入人口统计和社会经济数据(16.7%)以及记录疫苗拒绝或犹豫的能力(10.2%)。结论:IISs有助于提高疫苗可预防疾病的人群监测水平。必须解决与数据标准化、互操作性和成本效益评估相关的持久限制。加强这些方面对于充分利用IISs在各种卫生保健环境中的潜力至关重要,在这些卫生保健环境中,最迫切需要加强疫苗接种跟踪和靶向。
{"title":"Immunization information systems' implementation and characteristics across the world: a systematic review of the literature.","authors":"Giacomo Pietro Vigezzi, Elena Maggioni, Laura Clavario, Lorenzo Clerico Mosina, Eleonora Raso, Corina Marjin, Andrea Parrini, Matteo Carbone, Simone Fugazza, Alberto Marchisio, Manuela Martella, Giansanto Mosconi, Giuseppina Lo Moro, Fabrizio Bert, Corrado De Vito, Roberta Siliquini, Anna Odone","doi":"10.1080/14760584.2025.2510338","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14760584.2025.2510338","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Immunization Information Systems (IISs) are essential public health tools, supporting the management and analysis of vaccination data to aid clinical and strategic decision-making.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following PRISMA guidelines, this systematic review investigated global state and operational characteristics of IISs. A comprehensive search across multiple databases up to 6<sup>th</sup> of June 2023, identified 2,612 articles, with 238 included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A significant increase in IIS research was observed in recent years, with a strong preference (84.5%) for electronic immunization registers (EIRs). Notably, 36% of IISs operate at the national level, and 47.7% meet the U.S. CDC definition, 17.0% are interoperable with personal health records, and 11.7% provide direct access to vaccination data for vaccinees or their guardians. Other key features include automated reminder systems for recipients and providers (12.1%), near real-time or real-time data entry (11.0%), the inclusion of demographic and socioeconomic data (16.7%), and the capacity to document vaccine refusal or hesitancy (10.2%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>IISs contribute to improving population-level surveillance of vaccine-preventable diseases. Persistent limitations related to data standardization, interoperability, and cost-effectiveness evaluation must be addressed. Strengthening these aspects is crucial to fully harness the potential of IISs in various healthcare settings, where enhanced vaccination tracking and targeting are most urgently needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":12326,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Vaccines","volume":" ","pages":"668-702"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144141884","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Adverse reaction characteristics of five COVID-19 vaccines across different technology platforms: a pooled analysis of nine clinical trials. 不同技术平台上5种COVID-19疫苗的不良反应特征:9项临床试验的汇总分析
IF 5.5 3区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-07 DOI: 10.1080/14760584.2025.2502031
Yue Liu, Qian Liu, Lai-Run Jin, Wei-Wei Han, Ming-Wei Wei, Si-Yue Jia, Feng-Cai Zhu, Jing-Xin Li

Background: Evidence regarding the comparative safety of different COVID-19 vaccines remains limited. This study aims to characterize and compare the safety profiles of five COVID-19 vaccines in terms of adverse reactions after immunization.

Research design and methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of adverse reactions reported among adults aged 18-59 years from nine clinical trials. The analyzed vaccines included inactivated, recombinant protein, intranasal influenza-vectored, aerosolized and intramuscular Ad5 vectored COVID-19 vaccines. Factor analysis and association rule analysis were used to characterize adverse reaction patterns, while multivariate logistic regression was employed to assess the influence of vaccine type and demographic factors.

Results: Inactivated, recombinant, and intramuscular Ad5 vectored vaccines commonly caused injection site pain, fatigue, headache, and pyrexia from the SOC of 'General disorders and administration site conditions.' Intranasal influenza-vectored vaccines mainly cause respiratory symptoms such as rhinorrhea and nasal congestion, while dry mouth and oropharyngeal pain from 'Gastrointestinal disorders' were primarily observed in aerosolized Ad5 vectored vaccines. Younger age (p < 0.001), female sex (p = 0.001), comorbidities (p < 0.001), and intramuscular Ad5 vectored vaccines (p < 0.001) were significantly associated with higher adverse reaction risks.

Conclusions: COVID-19 vaccines developed through different technological approaches have distinct adverse reaction profiles.

背景:关于不同COVID-19疫苗相对安全性的证据仍然有限。本研究旨在描述和比较五种COVID-19疫苗免疫后不良反应的安全性。研究设计和方法:我们对9项临床试验中18-59岁成人报告的不良反应进行了回顾性分析。分析的疫苗包括灭活疫苗、重组蛋白疫苗、鼻内流感载体疫苗、雾化疫苗和肌内Ad5载体疫苗。采用因子分析和关联规则分析表征不良反应模式,采用多因素logistic回归评估疫苗类型和人口统计学因素的影响。结果:从“一般疾病和给药部位情况”的SOC来看,灭活疫苗、重组疫苗和肌肉注射Ad5载体疫苗通常会引起注射部位疼痛、疲劳、头痛和发热。鼻内流感载体疫苗主要引起呼吸道症状,如鼻漏和鼻塞,而由“胃肠道疾病”引起的口干和口咽疼痛主要见于雾化的Ad5载体疫苗。结论:通过不同技术方法开发的COVID-19疫苗具有不同的不良反应概况。
{"title":"Adverse reaction characteristics of five COVID-19 vaccines across different technology platforms: a pooled analysis of nine clinical trials.","authors":"Yue Liu, Qian Liu, Lai-Run Jin, Wei-Wei Han, Ming-Wei Wei, Si-Yue Jia, Feng-Cai Zhu, Jing-Xin Li","doi":"10.1080/14760584.2025.2502031","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14760584.2025.2502031","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evidence regarding the comparative safety of different COVID-19 vaccines remains limited. This study aims to characterize and compare the safety profiles of five COVID-19 vaccines in terms of adverse reactions after immunization.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective analysis of adverse reactions reported among adults aged 18-59 years from nine clinical trials. The analyzed vaccines included inactivated, recombinant protein, intranasal influenza-vectored, aerosolized and intramuscular Ad5 vectored COVID-19 vaccines. Factor analysis and association rule analysis were used to characterize adverse reaction patterns, while multivariate logistic regression was employed to assess the influence of vaccine type and demographic factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Inactivated, recombinant, and intramuscular Ad5 vectored vaccines commonly caused injection site pain, fatigue, headache, and pyrexia from the SOC of 'General disorders and administration site conditions.' Intranasal influenza-vectored vaccines mainly cause respiratory symptoms such as rhinorrhea and nasal congestion, while dry mouth and oropharyngeal pain from 'Gastrointestinal disorders' were primarily observed in aerosolized Ad5 vectored vaccines. Younger age (<i>p</i> < 0.001), female sex (<i>p</i> = 0.001), comorbidities (<i>p</i> < 0.001), and intramuscular Ad5 vectored vaccines (<i>p</i> < 0.001) were significantly associated with higher adverse reaction risks.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>COVID-19 vaccines developed through different technological approaches have distinct adverse reaction profiles.</p>","PeriodicalId":12326,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Vaccines","volume":"24 1","pages":"339-349"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144001766","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Immunogenicity and safety of a live attenuated varicella vaccine in healthy subjects aged between 13 to 55 years: a double-blind, randomized, active-controlled phase III clinical trial in China. 一种减毒水痘活疫苗在13 - 55岁健康受试者中的免疫原性和安全性:一项在中国开展的双盲、随机、主动对照iii期临床试验
IF 5.5 3区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-07 DOI: 10.1080/14760584.2025.2457463
Yang Zhang, Shiyuan Wang, Guifan Li, Jinhui Shi, Xianyun Chang, Hao Zhang, Fengcai Zhu, Jingxin Li, Hongxing Pan, Jinfang Sun

Background: Adolescents and adults who contract chickenpox are at a higher risk of severe complications. Vaccination with the varicella vaccine (VarV) effectively prevents chickenpox.

Research design and methods: In this phase III, single-center, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled trial, 1,200 healthy participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive two doses of either the test vaccine or the active control vaccine. Varicella-zoster virus (VZV) antibody was detected before vaccination and 42 days after the two doses of vaccination.

Results: The lower limits of the 95% CI for the differences in seroconversion rates and geometric mean titer (GMT) ratios between the two groups were greater than their respective pre-set non-inferiority margins. The overall incidence of Adverse events (AEs) and adverse reactions (ARs) in the test group was significantly lower than those in the control group. Additionally, the incidence rates of swelling and fatigue were lower in the test group compared to the control group after vaccination.

Conclusions: The test freeze-dried live attenuated VarV demonstrated good immunogenicity and higher safety compared to the active control vaccine in healthy participants aged 13-55 years.

Clinical trials registration: www.clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT06592456.

背景:患水痘的青少年和成人发生严重并发症的风险较高。接种水痘疫苗(VarV)可有效预防水痘。研究设计和方法:在这个单中心、随机、双盲、主动对照的III期试验中,1200名健康参与者按1:1的比例随机分配,接受两剂试验疫苗或主动对照疫苗。水痘-带状疱疹病毒(VZV)抗体在接种前和接种两剂后42天检测。结果:两组血清转化率和几何平均滴度(GMT)比差异的95% CI下限大于各自预设的非劣效性边界。试验组不良事件(ae)和不良反应(ARs)的总发生率均显著低于对照组。此外,接种疫苗后,实验组的肿胀和疲劳发生率低于对照组。结论:冻干VarV减毒活疫苗在13-55岁的健康受试者中表现出良好的免疫原性和更高的安全性。临床试验注册:www.clinicaltrials.gov标识符:NCT06592456。
{"title":"Immunogenicity and safety of a live attenuated varicella vaccine in healthy subjects aged between 13 to 55 years: a double-blind, randomized, active-controlled phase III clinical trial in China.","authors":"Yang Zhang, Shiyuan Wang, Guifan Li, Jinhui Shi, Xianyun Chang, Hao Zhang, Fengcai Zhu, Jingxin Li, Hongxing Pan, Jinfang Sun","doi":"10.1080/14760584.2025.2457463","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14760584.2025.2457463","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adolescents and adults who contract chickenpox are at a higher risk of severe complications. Vaccination with the varicella vaccine (VarV) effectively prevents chickenpox.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>In this phase III, single-center, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled trial, 1,200 healthy participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive two doses of either the test vaccine or the active control vaccine. Varicella-zoster virus (VZV) antibody was detected before vaccination and 42 days after the two doses of vaccination.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The lower limits of the 95% CI for the differences in seroconversion rates and geometric mean titer (GMT) ratios between the two groups were greater than their respective pre-set non-inferiority margins. The overall incidence of Adverse events (AEs) and adverse reactions (ARs) in the test group was significantly lower than those in the control group. Additionally, the incidence rates of swelling and fatigue were lower in the test group compared to the control group after vaccination.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The test freeze-dried live attenuated VarV demonstrated good immunogenicity and higher safety compared to the active control vaccine in healthy participants aged 13-55 years.</p><p><strong>Clinical trials registration: </strong>www.clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT06592456.</p>","PeriodicalId":12326,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Vaccines","volume":" ","pages":"157-164"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143364213","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A benefit-cost analysis quantifying the broader socioeconomic value of adult respiratory vaccination programs in Japan. 效益-成本分析量化了日本成人呼吸道疫苗接种计划的更广泛的社会经济价值。
IF 5.5 3区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-22 DOI: 10.1080/14760584.2025.2536092
Claud Theakston, Matthew Napier, Simon Brassel, Kazumasa Kamei, Shuhei Ito, Jeffrey Vietri, Diana Mendes, Jingyan Yang, Tianyan Hu, Lotte Steuten

Background: Respiratory infections like pneumococcal disease (PD), respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), influenza (Flu), and COVID-19 significantly impact Japan's aging population, imposing substantial health and economic burdens. Effective vaccines exist, yet uptake remains limited due to funding constraints and vaccine hesitancy. This study assessed the societal return on investment in adult respiratory vaccination programs to support informed policy decisions.

Research design & methods: We conducted a benefit-cost analysis using static cohort models and life tables to estimate benefit-cost ratios (BCRs) and societal net benefits (NBs), monetizing health impacts through the value of statistical life and cost-of-illness methods. Costs comprised vaccination program expenses. Scenario and sensitivity analyses explore coverage scenarios and parameter assumptions.

Results: Adult vaccination programs generated BCRs around 18:1 within 5 years and 20:1 over a lifetime. Lifetime NBs exceeded ¥113 trillion, preventing nearly three million hospitalizations and freeing millions of hospital bed-days, alongside avoiding over ¥100 billion in productivity losses. Expanding vaccine coverage significantly increased the NBs by > 30%, whereas reduced COVID-19 vaccine uptake notably diminished returns.

Conclusion: Japan's adult respiratory vaccination programs generate substantial socioeconomic returns, strengthening public health, healthcare resilience, and workforce productivity. Increasing uptake across the population can generate significantly higher NBs. Realizing these benefits requires addressing vaccine uptake barriers and enhancing public investment.

背景:肺炎球菌病(PD)、呼吸道合胞病毒(RSV)、流感(Flu)和COVID-19等呼吸道感染严重影响了日本的老龄化人口,造成了巨大的健康和经济负担。有效的疫苗已经存在,但由于资金限制和对疫苗的犹豫,吸收仍然有限。本研究评估了成人呼吸道疫苗接种项目投资的社会回报,以支持知情的政策决策。研究设计和方法:我们使用静态队列模型和生命表进行了效益成本分析,以估计效益成本比(bcr)和社会净效益(NBs),通过统计生命价值和疾病成本方法将健康影响货币化。费用包括疫苗接种计划费用。情景和敏感性分析探讨了覆盖情景和参数假设。结果:成人疫苗接种计划在5年内产生的bcr约为18:1,在一生中产生的bcr约为20:1。终身国民收入超过113万亿日元,避免了近300万人住院,节省了数百万个住院日,同时避免了超过1000亿日元的生产力损失。扩大疫苗覆盖率可显著提高国民免疫力30%,而减少COVID-19疫苗接种率则显著降低了回报。结论:日本的成人呼吸道疫苗接种计划产生了可观的社会经济回报,加强了公共卫生、医疗保健复原力和劳动力生产率。在人口中增加摄取可以产生显著更高的国民健康指数。实现这些好处需要解决疫苗接种障碍和加强公共投资。
{"title":"A benefit-cost analysis quantifying the broader socioeconomic value of adult respiratory vaccination programs in Japan.","authors":"Claud Theakston, Matthew Napier, Simon Brassel, Kazumasa Kamei, Shuhei Ito, Jeffrey Vietri, Diana Mendes, Jingyan Yang, Tianyan Hu, Lotte Steuten","doi":"10.1080/14760584.2025.2536092","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14760584.2025.2536092","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Respiratory infections like pneumococcal disease (PD), respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), influenza (Flu), and COVID-19 significantly impact Japan's aging population, imposing substantial health and economic burdens. Effective vaccines exist, yet uptake remains limited due to funding constraints and vaccine hesitancy. This study assessed the societal return on investment in adult respiratory vaccination programs to support informed policy decisions.</p><p><strong>Research design & methods: </strong>We conducted a benefit-cost analysis using static cohort models and life tables to estimate benefit-cost ratios (BCRs) and societal net benefits (NBs), monetizing health impacts through the value of statistical life and cost-of-illness methods. Costs comprised vaccination program expenses. Scenario and sensitivity analyses explore coverage scenarios and parameter assumptions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Adult vaccination programs generated BCRs around 18:1 within 5 years and 20:1 over a lifetime. Lifetime NBs exceeded ¥113 trillion, preventing nearly three million hospitalizations and freeing millions of hospital bed-days, alongside avoiding over ¥100 billion in productivity losses. Expanding vaccine coverage significantly increased the NBs by > 30%, whereas reduced COVID-19 vaccine uptake notably diminished returns.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Japan's adult respiratory vaccination programs generate substantial socioeconomic returns, strengthening public health, healthcare resilience, and workforce productivity. Increasing uptake across the population can generate significantly higher NBs. Realizing these benefits requires addressing vaccine uptake barriers and enhancing public investment.</p>","PeriodicalId":12326,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Vaccines","volume":" ","pages":"633-643"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144667470","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Effectiveness of CoronaVac primary series with and without booster against hospitalized COVID-19 during the Omicron-predominant epidemic wave in the Philippines: a test-negative case-control study. 在菲律宾以omicron为主的流行波期间,CoronaVac一级系列有和没有加强剂对住院的COVID-19的有效性:一项检测阴性的病例对照研究。
IF 4.8 3区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-31 DOI: 10.1080/14760584.2025.2539889
Kristal An Agrupis, Michelle Ylade, Yang Yang Qi, Maria Vinna Crisostomo, Jedas Veronica Daag, Gianne Lariz Magsakay, Jude Raphael Lo, Kiarah Louise Florendo, March Helena Jane Lopez, Jayne Marie Enriquez, Irish Lobitaña, Gretchen Bonita Ranada, Regina Alfonso, Mitzi Marie Chua, Mitzie Lou Osabel, Mary Ann Igoy-Bacay, Carren Anne Bocaling, Lorenz Von Seidlein, Xuanyi Wang, Jacqueline Deen

Background: CoronaVac (Sinovac) was initially effective against symptomatic COVID-19 and severe outcomes, but its performance against the immune-evasive Omicron variant remains uncertain. This study evaluated the effectiveness of CoronaVac against hospitalized COVID-19 among Filipino adults during the Omicron-dominant wave.

Research design and methods: We conducted a test-negative case-control study from November 2022 to November 2023 in three tertiary government hospitals in the Philippines. Adults hospitalized with acute respiratory illness (ARI) were enrolled. Cases tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR; controls tested negative. Vaccination status was confirmed via vaccination cards or the national registry. Conditional logistic regression estimated vaccine effectiveness (VE). Genomic sequencing identified circulating variants.

Results: Among 2,365 participants, 165 (7.0%) were COVID-19 positive. In an age-matched analysis (104 cases, 408 controls), two CoronaVac doses provided 61.3% protection (95% CI: 5.3-84.2%) against critical illness. A heterologous booster conferred 65.9% protection against severe disease, 90.1% against critical illness, and 60.5% against death. Sequencing of 23/46 samples confirmed Omicron XBB-like variants.

Conclusion: Two doses of CoronaVac offered moderate protection against severe COVID-19. Heterologous boosters significantly improved protection, especially against critical illness and death, supporting ongoing booster campaigns after inactivated vaccine priming.

背景:CoronaVac (Sinovac)最初对症状性COVID-19和严重结局有效,但其对免疫逃避型Omicron变体的表现仍不确定。本研究评估了在omicron主导浪潮期间,CoronaVac对住院的菲律宾成年人COVID-19的有效性。研究设计和方法:我们于2022年11月至2023年11月在菲律宾的三所三级政府医院进行了一项检测阴性的病例对照研究。研究对象为急性呼吸道疾病(ARI)住院的成人。RT-PCR检测SARS-CoV-2阳性病例;对照组检测为阴性。通过疫苗接种卡或国家登记处确认疫苗接种情况。条件logistic回归估计疫苗有效性(VE)。基因组测序确定了循环变体。结果:2365名参与者中,新冠病毒阳性165人(7.0%)。在一项年龄匹配分析(104例,408例对照)中,两剂CoronaVac对危重疾病提供了61.3%的保护(95% CI: 5.3%-84.2%)。异种强化疫苗对重症的防护率为65.9%,对危重疾病的防护率为90.1%,对死亡的防护率为60.5%。23/46个样本的测序证实了Omicron xbb样变异。结论:两剂CoronaVac对重症COVID-19具有中等保护作用。异种增强剂显著提高了保护作用,特别是对危重疾病和死亡的保护作用,支持灭活疫苗启动后持续的加强运动。
{"title":"Effectiveness of CoronaVac primary series with and without booster against hospitalized COVID-19 during the Omicron-predominant epidemic wave in the Philippines: a test-negative case-control study.","authors":"Kristal An Agrupis, Michelle Ylade, Yang Yang Qi, Maria Vinna Crisostomo, Jedas Veronica Daag, Gianne Lariz Magsakay, Jude Raphael Lo, Kiarah Louise Florendo, March Helena Jane Lopez, Jayne Marie Enriquez, Irish Lobitaña, Gretchen Bonita Ranada, Regina Alfonso, Mitzi Marie Chua, Mitzie Lou Osabel, Mary Ann Igoy-Bacay, Carren Anne Bocaling, Lorenz Von Seidlein, Xuanyi Wang, Jacqueline Deen","doi":"10.1080/14760584.2025.2539889","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14760584.2025.2539889","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>CoronaVac (Sinovac) was initially effective against symptomatic COVID-19 and severe outcomes, but its performance against the immune-evasive Omicron variant remains uncertain. This study evaluated the effectiveness of CoronaVac against hospitalized COVID-19 among Filipino adults during the Omicron-dominant wave.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>We conducted a test-negative case-control study from November 2022 to November 2023 in three tertiary government hospitals in the Philippines. Adults hospitalized with acute respiratory illness (ARI) were enrolled. Cases tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR; controls tested negative. Vaccination status was confirmed via vaccination cards or the national registry. Conditional logistic regression estimated vaccine effectiveness (VE). Genomic sequencing identified circulating variants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 2,365 participants, 165 (7.0%) were COVID-19 positive. In an age-matched analysis (104 cases, 408 controls), two CoronaVac doses provided 61.3% protection (95% CI: 5.3-84.2%) against critical illness. A heterologous booster conferred 65.9% protection against severe disease, 90.1% against critical illness, and 60.5% against death. Sequencing of 23/46 samples confirmed Omicron XBB-like variants.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Two doses of CoronaVac offered moderate protection against severe COVID-19. Heterologous boosters significantly improved protection, especially against critical illness and death, supporting ongoing booster campaigns after inactivated vaccine priming.</p>","PeriodicalId":12326,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Vaccines","volume":" ","pages":"738-749"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144729083","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Two decades of GSK rotavirus vaccine (RV1): a global analysis to estimate vaccination completion and deaths averted in children under 5 years. 葛兰素史克轮状病毒疫苗(RV1)的二十年:一项估计5岁以下儿童疫苗接种完成情况和避免死亡的全球分析
IF 4.8 3区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-25 DOI: 10.1080/14760584.2025.2564167
Victoria Genovez, Olivia Berton, Stéphanie Barthès, Frederik Verelst, Eliana Biundo

Background: Rotavirus vaccination plays a key role in reducing rotavirus gastroenteritis (RVGE) related deaths. This analysis estimated the number of children under 5 years of age fully vaccinated with GSK rotavirus vaccine (RV1) since launch (2004) and its impact on RVGE-related deaths worldwide.

Research design and methods: To estimate the number of children under 5 years fully vaccinated with RV1 since launch, we used unpublished RV1 market supply data from GSK. The data were extrapolated until the time point when 1 billion doses will have been supplied. The number of RVGE-related deaths avoided was calculated using previously published data on the number of children needed to be fully vaccinated to avoid one fatal RVGE.

Results: Approximately 431 million children under 5 years received a complete RV1 course from 2004 to 2023, avoiding over 220,000 RVGE-related deaths globally. The forecasted analysis estimated that by January 2025, 1 billion RV1 doses will have been supplied worldwide, representing 239,000 RVGE-related deaths avoided. By December 2025, 0.5 billion babies will be protected with RV1, resulting in 259,000 RVGE-related deaths avoided since 2004.

Conclusion: RV1 has contributed to reducing the number of RVGE cases and related deaths and is anticipated to continue reducing this disease burden.

背景:轮状病毒疫苗接种在减少轮状病毒胃肠炎(RVGE)相关死亡中起着关键作用。该分析估计了GSK轮状病毒疫苗(RV1)自2004年上市以来全面接种的5岁以下儿童数量,以及该疫苗对全球轮状病毒疫苗相关死亡的影响。研究设计和方法:为了估计自RV1上市以来5岁以下儿童完全接种的数量,我们使用了GSK未发表的RV1市场供应数据。这些数据是外推的,直到将提供10亿剂的时间点为止。避免的与RVGE相关的死亡人数是根据先前公布的关于需要充分接种疫苗以避免一次致命的RVGE的儿童人数的数据计算的。结果:从2004年到2023年,全球约有4.31亿5岁以下儿童接受了完整的RV1疗程,避免了超过22万例rvge相关死亡。预测分析估计,到2025年1月,全世界将提供10亿剂RV1疫苗,这意味着避免了23.9万例与rvge有关的死亡。到2025年12月,将有5亿婴儿得到RV1的保护,自2004年以来避免了25.9万例与rvge有关的死亡。结论:RV1有助于减少RVGE病例和相关死亡人数,预计将继续减少这种疾病负担。
{"title":"Two decades of GSK rotavirus vaccine (RV1): a global analysis to estimate vaccination completion and deaths averted in children under 5 years.","authors":"Victoria Genovez, Olivia Berton, Stéphanie Barthès, Frederik Verelst, Eliana Biundo","doi":"10.1080/14760584.2025.2564167","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14760584.2025.2564167","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rotavirus vaccination plays a key role in reducing rotavirus gastroenteritis (RVGE) related deaths. This analysis estimated the number of children under 5 years of age fully vaccinated with GSK rotavirus vaccine (RV1) since launch (2004) and its impact on RVGE-related deaths worldwide.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>To estimate the number of children under 5 years fully vaccinated with RV1 since launch, we used unpublished RV1 market supply data from GSK. The data were extrapolated until the time point when 1 billion doses will have been supplied. The number of RVGE-related deaths avoided was calculated using previously published data on the number of children needed to be fully vaccinated to avoid one fatal RVGE.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Approximately 431 million children under 5 years received a complete RV1 course from 2004 to 2023, avoiding over 220,000 RVGE-related deaths globally. The forecasted analysis estimated that by January 2025, 1 billion RV1 doses will have been supplied worldwide, representing 239,000 RVGE-related deaths avoided. By December 2025, 0.5 billion babies will be protected with RV1, resulting in 259,000 RVGE-related deaths avoided since 2004.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RV1 has contributed to reducing the number of RVGE cases and related deaths and is anticipated to continue reducing this disease burden.</p>","PeriodicalId":12326,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Vaccines","volume":" ","pages":"936-943"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145112470","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Correction. 修正。
IF 4.8 3区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-05 DOI: 10.1080/14760584.2025.2567720
{"title":"Correction.","authors":"","doi":"10.1080/14760584.2025.2567720","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14760584.2025.2567720","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12326,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Vaccines","volume":"24 1","pages":"945"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145231831","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Trends in adolescent and adult vaccination in pharmacy and medical settings in the United States, 2018-2024: a database study. 2018-2024 年美国药房和医疗机构中青少年和成人疫苗接种趋势:一项数据库研究。
IF 5.5 3区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-22 DOI: 10.1080/14760584.2024.2441255
Yi Zheng, Dong Wang, Ya-Ting Chen, Kunal Saxena, Goran Bencina, Amanda L Eiden

Background: Pharmacies can increase access to vaccines. This study aimed to describe trends in the proportion of adolescent and adult vaccinations administered in pharmacies in the United States from 2018 to 2024.

Research design and methods: This was a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of medical and pharmacy claims from commercial health insurance enrollees. We recorded vaccinations received by enrollees ≥9 years of age from 2018 to 2023 (routine vaccines) or 2024 (seasonal vaccines). We calculated the annual proportion of vaccinations occurring in pharmacies and the accumulated percent change in vaccination rate during each year from 2020 onward compared to 2018-2019.

Results: The proportion of routine vaccinations occurring in pharmacies was higher among adults than among adolescents. For most routine vaccines, this proportion increased during the study period. The lowest proportion was observed for adolescent human papillomavirus vaccination in 2018 (0.2%), and the highest for herpes zoster vaccination among adults ≥65 years of age in 2023 (88.6%). For all age groups, pharmacy-based vaccination was more common for seasonal influenza and SARS-CoV-2 vaccines than for all routine vaccines except herpes zoster.

Conclusions: Pharmacy-based vaccination is increasingly common in the United States, particularly among adults and for seasonal vaccines, and can help increase the overall level of vaccine uptake.

背景:药店可以增加获得疫苗的机会。本研究旨在描述2018年至2024年美国药房中青少年和成人疫苗接种比例的趋势。研究设计和方法:对商业健康保险参保人的医疗和药房索赔进行回顾性横断面分析。我们记录了2018年至2023年(常规疫苗)或2024年(季节性疫苗)期间≥9岁入组者的疫苗接种情况。我们计算了药房每年接种疫苗的比例,以及与2018-2019年相比,2020年以后每年疫苗接种率的累计变化百分比。结果:成人在药店进行常规疫苗接种的比例高于青少年。对于大多数常规疫苗,这一比例在研究期间有所增加。2018年青少年人乳头瘤病毒疫苗接种率最低(0.2%),2023年65岁以上成人带状疱疹疫苗接种率最高(88.6%)。在所有年龄组中,季节性流感和SARS-CoV-2疫苗以药物为基础的疫苗接种比除带状疱疹外的所有常规疫苗更常见。结论:基于药物的疫苗接种在美国越来越普遍,特别是在成年人和季节性疫苗中,可以帮助提高疫苗的整体吸收水平。
{"title":"Trends in adolescent and adult vaccination in pharmacy and medical settings in the United States, 2018-2024: a database study.","authors":"Yi Zheng, Dong Wang, Ya-Ting Chen, Kunal Saxena, Goran Bencina, Amanda L Eiden","doi":"10.1080/14760584.2024.2441255","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14760584.2024.2441255","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pharmacies can increase access to vaccines. This study aimed to describe trends in the proportion of adolescent and adult vaccinations administered in pharmacies in the United States from 2018 to 2024.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>This was a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of medical and pharmacy claims from commercial health insurance enrollees. We recorded vaccinations received by enrollees ≥9 years of age from 2018 to 2023 (routine vaccines) or 2024 (seasonal vaccines). We calculated the annual proportion of vaccinations occurring in pharmacies and the accumulated percent change in vaccination rate during each year from 2020 onward compared to 2018-2019.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The proportion of routine vaccinations occurring in pharmacies was higher among adults than among adolescents. For most routine vaccines, this proportion increased during the study period. The lowest proportion was observed for adolescent human papillomavirus vaccination in 2018 (0.2%), and the highest for herpes zoster vaccination among adults ≥65 years of age in 2023 (88.6%). For all age groups, pharmacy-based vaccination was more common for seasonal influenza and SARS-CoV-2 vaccines than for all routine vaccines except herpes zoster.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Pharmacy-based vaccination is increasingly common in the United States, particularly among adults and for seasonal vaccines, and can help increase the overall level of vaccine uptake.</p>","PeriodicalId":12326,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Vaccines","volume":" ","pages":"53-66"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142828180","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Expert Review of Vaccines
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1