首页 > 最新文献

Fungal Diversity最新文献

英文 中文
Fungal diversity notes 1818–1918: taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions on genera and species of fungi 真菌多样性记录1818-1918:真菌属和种的分类和系统发育贡献
IF 20.3 1区 生物学 Q1 MYCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-12-19 DOI: 10.1007/s13225-024-00541-y
Ishara S. Manawasinghe, Kevin D. Hyde, Dhanushka N. Wanasinghe, Samantha C. Karunarathna, Sajeewa S. N. Maharachchikumbura, Milan C. Samarakoon, Hermann Voglmayr, Ka-Lai Pang, Michael Wai-Lun Chiang, E. B. Gareth Jones, Ramesh K. Saxena, Arun Kumar, Kunhiraman C. Rajeshkumar, Laura Selbmann, Claudia Coleine, Yuwei Hu, A. Martyn Ainsworth, Kare Liimatainen, Tuula Niskanen, Anna Ralaiveloarisoa, Elangovan Arumugam, Kezhocuyi Kezo, Malarvizhi Kaliyaperumal, Sugantha Gunaseelan, Asha J. Dissanayake, Abdul Nasir Khalid, Achala Jeevani Gajanayake, Adam Flakus, Alireza Armand, André Aptroot, Andre Rodrigues, Andrei Tsurykau, Ángela López-Villalba, Antonio Roberto Gomes de Farias, Antonio Sánchez, Aristóteles Góes-Neto, Bruno T. Goto, Carlos A. F. de Souza, Charuwan Chuaseeharonnachai, Chuan-Gen Lin, Cuijinyi Li, Cvetomir M. Denchev, Daniel Guerra-Mateo, Danushka S. Tennakoon, De-Ping Wei, Dominik Begerow, Eduardo Alves, Elisandro Ricardo Drechsler-Santos, Enayra Silva Sousa, Erika V..
<p>This article is the 17th in the Fungal Diversity Notes series which allows the researchers to publish fungal collections with updated reports of fungus-host and fungus-geography. Herein we report 97 taxa with four new genera distributed in three phyla (Ascomycota, Glomeromycota and Mucoromycota), 11 classes, 38 orders and 62 families collected from various regions worldwide. This collection is further classified into taxa from 69 genera with four novel genera namely <i>Jinshana</i>, <i>Lithophyllospora</i>, <i>Parapolyplosphaeria</i> and <i>Stegonsporiicola</i>. Furthermore, 71 new species, 21 new records, one new combination and four novel phylogenetic placements are provided. The new species comprise <i>Acrocalymma estuarinum, Aggregatorygma isidiatum, Alleppeysporonites elsikii, Amphibambusa aquatica, Apiospora hongheensis, Arthrobotrys tachengensis, Calonectria potisiana, Collariella hongheensis, Colletotrichum squamosae, Corynespora chengduensis, Diaporthe beijingensis, Dicellaesporites plicatus, Dicellaesporites verrucatus, Dictyoarthrinium endophyticum, Distoseptispora chiangraiensis, Dothiora eucalypti, Epicoccum indicum, Exesisporites chandrae, Fitzroyomyces pseudopandanicola, Fomitiporia exigua, Fomitiporia rondonii, Fulvifomes subthailandicus, Gigaspora siqueirae, Gymnopus ailaoensis, Hyalorbilia yunnanensis, Hygrocybe minimiholatra, H. mitsinjoensis, H. parviholatra, H. solis, H. vintsy, Helicogermslita kunmingensis, Jinshana tangtangiae, Kirschsteiniothelia dujuanhuensis, Lamproderma subcristatum, Leucoagaricus madagascarensis, Leucocoprinus mantadiaensis, Lithophyllospora australis, Marasmius qujingensis, Melomastia aquilariae, Monoporisporites jansoniusii, M. pattersonii, Monoporisporites valdiyae, Mucispora maesotensis, Mucor soli, Muyocopron yunnanensis, Nigrospora tomentosae, Ocellularia psorirregularis, Ophiocordyceps duyunensis, Oxneriaria nigrodisca, Oxydothis aquatica, O. filiforme, Phacidiella xishuangbannaensis, Phlebiopsis subgriseofuscescens, Pleurothecium takense, Pleurotus tuber-regium, Pseudochaetosphaeronema puerensis, Pseudodactylaria guttulate, Racheliella chinensis, Rhexoacrodictys fangensis, Roussoella neoaquatica, Rubroboletus pruinosus, Sanghuangporus subzonatus, Scytalidium assmuthi, Shrungabeeja kudremukhensis, Spirographa skorinae, Stanjehughesia bambusicola, Stegonsporiicola aurantiaca, Umbelopsis hingganensis, Vararia tenuata, Verruconis pakchongensis, Wongia bandungensis,</i> and <i>Zygosporium cymodoceae</i>. The new combination is <i>Parapolyplosphaeria thailandica</i> (≡ <i>Polyplosphaeria thailandica</i>). The 21 new hosts, geographical and habitat records comprise <i>Acrocalymma fici, Apiculospora spartii, Aspergillus subramanianii, Camposporium ramosum, Clonostachys rogersoniana, Colletotrichum brevisporum, C. plurivorum, Collybiopsis gibbosa, Dictyosporium tratense, Distoseptispora adscendens, Exosporium livistonae, Ganoderma gibbosum, Graphis mikuraensis, Gymnosporangium paraphysatum, Lasiodipl
这篇文章是真菌多样性笔记系列的第十七篇,该系列允许研究人员发表真菌收藏和真菌-宿主和真菌-地理的最新报告。本文报道了分布在世界各地的子囊菌门、肾小球菌门和毛菌门3门11纲38目62科97个分类群4个新属。进一步划分为69属的分类群,其中有4个新属,即金沙纳属(Jinshana)、石叶孢属(Lithophyllospora)、Parapolyplosphaeria和Stegonsporiicola。此外,还发现了71个新种、21个新记录、1个新组合和4个新的系统发育定位。新发现的物种包括:河口顶孢菌、isidiatum Aggregatorygma、elappeysporonites elsikii、Amphibambusa aquatica、honghearthrobotrys tachengensis、Calonectria potisiana、colllariella hongheensis、Colletotrichum squamosae、成都冠孢菌、北京冠孢菌、Dicellaesporites plicatus、Dicellaesporites verrucatus、Dictyoarthrinium内生菌、Distoseptispora chiangraiensis、Dothiora eucalyptus、Epicoccum indicum、Exesisporites chandrae、假檀香费茨royomyces, exigua, rondonia, fulviformia subtandicus, gigasporae siqueirae, ailaoopsis, hyalbilia yunnanensis, hydrocybe minimiholatra, mitsinjoensis, parviholatra, H. solis, H. vintsy, helicogelmslitia kunmingensis, Jinshana tangtangiae, Kirschsteiniothelia dujuanhuensis, criproderma subcristia, leucagaricus马达加斯加,leucoporensis mantadiaensis, lithophylosporia australis, quasmius qujingensis, melomasariae aquilariae,杨氏单机会孢子虫、斑纹单机会孢子虫、斑纹单机会孢子虫、斑纹单机会孢子虫、云南单机会孢子虫、毛囊黑孢子虫、银屑病细胞虫、杜云虫草、黑孢子虫、水孢子虫、丝状孢子虫、西双版纳Phacidiella西双版纳Phacidiella西双版纳Phacidiella西双版纳phacidius subgriseofuscesensis、takense胸膜菌、结核胸膜菌、普氏假毛囊菌、斑纹假毛囊菌、中国棘球菌、fangrexoacrodictys新水梭菌、原恙螨、桑黄孢子虫、沙棘孢子虫、皱缩孢子虫、黑螺旋体、竹藤孢子虫、金隐孢子虫、兴甘伞虫、细纹变异菌、包绒孢子虫、黄黄孢子虫和cymodocezygosporium。新的组合是泰国多plosphaeria thailand(≡泰国多plosphaeria thailand)。新发现的21个寄主、地理和生境记录包括:顶孢螨、spartii Apiculospora spartii、subramanianasperus、camposporum ramosum、Clonostachys rogersonana、短孢炭疽菌(Colletotrichum brevisporum)、多角曲霉(C. plurivorum)、长臂猿(Collybiopsis gibbosa)、tratense Dictyosporium tratense、distoseptisporica adsides)、长臂猿(Gymnosporangium parysysatum)、泰国长臂猿(Lasiodiplodia)、bullatus、cremeogriseum、echinulonalgivense)、javanicum、lanosocoeruleum、polonicum和pleple菇。给出了新的系统发育位置:绿绒草、泛halensis和G. parilis。此外,我们还提供了以前的真菌多样性注释1611-1716中缺失的Tarzetta tibetensis的形态。形态学和多基因系统发育分析为所有分类群的鉴定提供了支持。
{"title":"Fungal diversity notes 1818–1918: taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions on genera and species of fungi","authors":"Ishara S. Manawasinghe, Kevin D. Hyde, Dhanushka N. Wanasinghe, Samantha C. Karunarathna, Sajeewa S. N. Maharachchikumbura, Milan C. Samarakoon, Hermann Voglmayr, Ka-Lai Pang, Michael Wai-Lun Chiang, E. B. Gareth Jones, Ramesh K. Saxena, Arun Kumar, Kunhiraman C. Rajeshkumar, Laura Selbmann, Claudia Coleine, Yuwei Hu, A. Martyn Ainsworth, Kare Liimatainen, Tuula Niskanen, Anna Ralaiveloarisoa, Elangovan Arumugam, Kezhocuyi Kezo, Malarvizhi Kaliyaperumal, Sugantha Gunaseelan, Asha J. Dissanayake, Abdul Nasir Khalid, Achala Jeevani Gajanayake, Adam Flakus, Alireza Armand, André Aptroot, Andre Rodrigues, Andrei Tsurykau, Ángela López-Villalba, Antonio Roberto Gomes de Farias, Antonio Sánchez, Aristóteles Góes-Neto, Bruno T. Goto, Carlos A. F. de Souza, Charuwan Chuaseeharonnachai, Chuan-Gen Lin, Cuijinyi Li, Cvetomir M. Denchev, Daniel Guerra-Mateo, Danushka S. Tennakoon, De-Ping Wei, Dominik Begerow, Eduardo Alves, Elisandro Ricardo Drechsler-Santos, Enayra Silva Sousa, Erika V..","doi":"10.1007/s13225-024-00541-y","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-024-00541-y","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;This article is the 17th in the Fungal Diversity Notes series which allows the researchers to publish fungal collections with updated reports of fungus-host and fungus-geography. Herein we report 97 taxa with four new genera distributed in three phyla (Ascomycota, Glomeromycota and Mucoromycota), 11 classes, 38 orders and 62 families collected from various regions worldwide. This collection is further classified into taxa from 69 genera with four novel genera namely &lt;i&gt;Jinshana&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;Lithophyllospora&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;Parapolyplosphaeria&lt;/i&gt; and &lt;i&gt;Stegonsporiicola&lt;/i&gt;. Furthermore, 71 new species, 21 new records, one new combination and four novel phylogenetic placements are provided. The new species comprise &lt;i&gt;Acrocalymma estuarinum, Aggregatorygma isidiatum, Alleppeysporonites elsikii, Amphibambusa aquatica, Apiospora hongheensis, Arthrobotrys tachengensis, Calonectria potisiana, Collariella hongheensis, Colletotrichum squamosae, Corynespora chengduensis, Diaporthe beijingensis, Dicellaesporites plicatus, Dicellaesporites verrucatus, Dictyoarthrinium endophyticum, Distoseptispora chiangraiensis, Dothiora eucalypti, Epicoccum indicum, Exesisporites chandrae, Fitzroyomyces pseudopandanicola, Fomitiporia exigua, Fomitiporia rondonii, Fulvifomes subthailandicus, Gigaspora siqueirae, Gymnopus ailaoensis, Hyalorbilia yunnanensis, Hygrocybe minimiholatra, H. mitsinjoensis, H. parviholatra, H. solis, H. vintsy, Helicogermslita kunmingensis, Jinshana tangtangiae, Kirschsteiniothelia dujuanhuensis, Lamproderma subcristatum, Leucoagaricus madagascarensis, Leucocoprinus mantadiaensis, Lithophyllospora australis, Marasmius qujingensis, Melomastia aquilariae, Monoporisporites jansoniusii, M. pattersonii, Monoporisporites valdiyae, Mucispora maesotensis, Mucor soli, Muyocopron yunnanensis, Nigrospora tomentosae, Ocellularia psorirregularis, Ophiocordyceps duyunensis, Oxneriaria nigrodisca, Oxydothis aquatica, O. filiforme, Phacidiella xishuangbannaensis, Phlebiopsis subgriseofuscescens, Pleurothecium takense, Pleurotus tuber-regium, Pseudochaetosphaeronema puerensis, Pseudodactylaria guttulate, Racheliella chinensis, Rhexoacrodictys fangensis, Roussoella neoaquatica, Rubroboletus pruinosus, Sanghuangporus subzonatus, Scytalidium assmuthi, Shrungabeeja kudremukhensis, Spirographa skorinae, Stanjehughesia bambusicola, Stegonsporiicola aurantiaca, Umbelopsis hingganensis, Vararia tenuata, Verruconis pakchongensis, Wongia bandungensis,&lt;/i&gt; and &lt;i&gt;Zygosporium cymodoceae&lt;/i&gt;. The new combination is &lt;i&gt;Parapolyplosphaeria thailandica&lt;/i&gt; (≡ &lt;i&gt;Polyplosphaeria thailandica&lt;/i&gt;). The 21 new hosts, geographical and habitat records comprise &lt;i&gt;Acrocalymma fici, Apiculospora spartii, Aspergillus subramanianii, Camposporium ramosum, Clonostachys rogersoniana, Colletotrichum brevisporum, C. plurivorum, Collybiopsis gibbosa, Dictyosporium tratense, Distoseptispora adscendens, Exosporium livistonae, Ganoderma gibbosum, Graphis mikuraensis, Gymnosporangium paraphysatum, Lasiodipl","PeriodicalId":12471,"journal":{"name":"Fungal Diversity","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":20.3,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142858396","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Taxonomy and systematics of lignicolous helicosporous hyphomycetes 木质素幽门孢子丝孢的分类与系统
IF 20.3 1区 生物学 Q1 MYCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-12-16 DOI: 10.1007/s13225-024-00544-9
Jian Ma, Kevin D. Hyde, Saowaluck Tibpromma, Deecksha Gomdola, Ning-Guo Liu, Chada Norphanphoun, Dan-Feng Bao, Saranyaphat Boonmee, Xing-Juan Xiao, Li-Juan Zhang, Zong-Long Luo, Qi Zhao, Nakarin Suwannarach, Samantha C. Karunarathna, Jian-Kui Liu, Yong-Zhong Lu
<p>Helicosporous hyphomycetes are a fungal group with similar coiled or spiral conidial morphology but significant differences in genetic information, resulting in them being distributed in different phyla, classes, orders, and families. However, there are no comprehensive studies for this group. In this study, we have systematically organized the helicosporous taxa, revised their classification and provided a modern taxonomic framework based on morphology and phylogeny. This group encompasses 112 genera and 474 species distributed in three phyla, ten classes, 20 orders and 25 families, while some taxa are classified as <i>incertae sedis</i> within Ascomycota. The illustrations and notes for all helicosporous genera and the drawings of the type or representative species that have not been collected and examined are provided. Additionally, a phylogenetic taxonomic distribution of helicosporous families based on maximum likelihood analysis of LSU, ITS, SSU, <i>tef</i>1-α, and <i>rpb</i>2 sequence data is provided. In addition, we obtained 160 new collections from China and Thailand. Based on molecular evidence and morphological characteristics, six new helicosporous genera viz<i>. Acrohelicosporium</i>, <i>Hyalohelicoon</i>, <i>Hyalohelisphora</i>, <i>Hyalotubeufia</i>, <i>Pseudocirrenalia</i>, and <i>Pseudohelicosporium</i> and 53 new species, viz<i>. Acrohelicosporium abundatum</i>, <i>A</i>. <i>aquaticum</i>,<i> A</i>. <i>guizhouense</i>,<i> A</i>. <i>viridisporum</i>, <i>Berkleasmium hainanense</i>, <i>Helicoma brunneum</i>, <i>H</i>. <i>astrictum</i>,<i> H</i>. <i>dipterocarpi</i>,<i> H</i>. <i>guizhouense</i>,<i> H</i>. <i>sclerotiferum</i>,<i> H</i>. <i>tropicum</i>,<i> H</i>. <i>yinggelingense</i>, <i>Helicoma yunnanense</i>, <i>Helicosporium acropleurogenum</i>, <i>H. brunneisporum</i>,<i> H</i>. <i>changjiangense</i>,<i> H</i>. <i>jiangkouense</i>,<i> H</i>. <i>latisporum</i>,<i> H</i>. <i>ramosiphorum</i>, <i>Helicotubeufia laxisporum</i>, <i>Hyalohelicoon multiseptatum</i>, <i>Hyalohelisphora lignicola</i>, <i>Neohelicomyces acropleurogenus</i>, <i>N</i>. <i>aseptatus</i>, <i>N</i>. <i>edgeworthiae</i>, <i>N</i>. <i>guttulatus</i>, <i>N</i>. <i>lignicola</i>,<i> N</i>. <i>macrosporus</i>,<i> N</i>. <i>qixingyaensis</i>,<i> N</i>. <i>xiayadongensis</i>,<i> N</i>. <i>yunnanensis</i>, <i>N</i>. <i>baihualingense</i>, <i>Neohelicosporium hainanense</i>, <i>N</i>. <i>jianfenglingense</i>,<i> N</i>. <i>latisporum</i>, <i>Parahelicomyces latisporus</i>, <i>Pa</i>. <i>laxisporus</i>, <i>Pa</i>. <i>parvisporus</i>, <i>Paratrimmatostroma helicosporum</i>, <i>Pleurohelicosporium brunneisporum</i>, <i>Pl</i>. <i>hyalosporum</i>, <i>Pl</i>. <i>multiseptatum</i>, <i>Pseudocirrenalia aquialpina</i>, <i>Pseudohelicosporium irregular</i>, <i>Ps</i>. <i>laxisporum</i>, <i>Pseudotubeufia dematiolaxispora</i>, <i>Sclerococcum astrictum</i>, <i>Tubeufia acropleurogena</i>, <i>T</i>. <i>baomeilingensis</i>, <i>T</i>. <i>denticulate</i>, <i>T</i>. <i>subrenis
单孢伞菌是一个真菌群体,其盘绕或螺旋状的分生孢子形态相似,但遗传信息存在显著差异,因此分布在不同的门、纲、目和科中。然而,目前还没有针对这一群体的全面研究。在这项研究中,我们系统地整理了螺旋孢分类群,修订了它们的分类,并提供了一个基于形态学和系统发育的现代分类框架。该类群包括 112 属和 474 种,分布在 3 个门、10 个类、20 个目和 25 个科,其中一些分类群被归入子囊菌目(Ascomycota)中的原生类(incertae sedis)。该书提供了所有螺旋孢属的插图和注释,以及尚未采集和检验的模式种或代表种的图纸。此外,根据对 LSU、ITS、SSU、tef1-α 和 rpb2 序列数据的最大似然法分析,提供了螺旋孢属的系统发生分类分布。此外,我们还从中国和泰国获得了 160 个新的采集品。根据分子证据和形态特征,我们发现了 6 个新的螺旋孢属,即 Acrohelicosporium、Hyalohelicoon、Hyalohelisphora、Hyalotubeufia、Pseudocirrenalia 和 Pseudohelicosporium,以及 53 个新种,即 Acrohelicosporium abundatum、A. aquaticum、A. guizhouense、A. viridisporum、Berkleasmium hainanense、Helicoma brunneum、H.H.sclerotiferum、H. tropicum、H. yinggelingense、Helicoma yunnanense、Helicosporium acropleurogenum、H. brunneisporum、H.changjiangense、H. jiangkouense、H. latisporum、H. ramosiphorum、Helicotubeufia laxisporum、Hyalohelicoon multiseptatum、Hyalohelisphora lignicola、Neohelicomyces acropleurogenus、N.aseptatus、N. edgeworthiae、N. guttulatus、N. lignicola、N. macrosporus、N. qixingyaensis、N. xiayadongensis、N. yunnanensis、N. baihualingense、Neohelicosporium hainanense、N.latisporum, Parahelicomyces latisporus, Pa. laxisporus, Pa. parvisporus, Paratrimmatostroma helicosporum, Pleurohelicosporium brunneisporum, Pl.hyalosporum, Pl. multiseptatum, Pseudocirrenalia aquialpina, Pseudohelicosporium irregular, Ps. laxisporum, Pseudotubeufia dematiolaxispora, Sclerococcum astrictum, Tubeufia acropleurogena, T. baomeilingensis, T. denticulate, T. subrenispora, T. tropica, and Troposporella guttulata。此外,还报告了 37 个新记录和 22 个已知种。此外,我们还对 30 个物种进行了异名化,并提供了 30 个新的组合。我们还为新分类群、新组合、新记录和已知种提供了完整的描述、插图、注释以及基于最大似然法和贝叶斯法分析的系统发生树,包括 LSU、ITS、mtSSU、SSU、tef1-α 和 rpb2 序列数据。此外,还提供了一份全球核对表,其中包括已接受的螺旋孢属物种的分布、栖息地和分子数据的可用性。
{"title":"Taxonomy and systematics of lignicolous helicosporous hyphomycetes","authors":"Jian Ma, Kevin D. Hyde, Saowaluck Tibpromma, Deecksha Gomdola, Ning-Guo Liu, Chada Norphanphoun, Dan-Feng Bao, Saranyaphat Boonmee, Xing-Juan Xiao, Li-Juan Zhang, Zong-Long Luo, Qi Zhao, Nakarin Suwannarach, Samantha C. Karunarathna, Jian-Kui Liu, Yong-Zhong Lu","doi":"10.1007/s13225-024-00544-9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-024-00544-9","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;Helicosporous hyphomycetes are a fungal group with similar coiled or spiral conidial morphology but significant differences in genetic information, resulting in them being distributed in different phyla, classes, orders, and families. However, there are no comprehensive studies for this group. In this study, we have systematically organized the helicosporous taxa, revised their classification and provided a modern taxonomic framework based on morphology and phylogeny. This group encompasses 112 genera and 474 species distributed in three phyla, ten classes, 20 orders and 25 families, while some taxa are classified as &lt;i&gt;incertae sedis&lt;/i&gt; within Ascomycota. The illustrations and notes for all helicosporous genera and the drawings of the type or representative species that have not been collected and examined are provided. Additionally, a phylogenetic taxonomic distribution of helicosporous families based on maximum likelihood analysis of LSU, ITS, SSU, &lt;i&gt;tef&lt;/i&gt;1-α, and &lt;i&gt;rpb&lt;/i&gt;2 sequence data is provided. In addition, we obtained 160 new collections from China and Thailand. Based on molecular evidence and morphological characteristics, six new helicosporous genera viz&lt;i&gt;. Acrohelicosporium&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;Hyalohelicoon&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;Hyalohelisphora&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;Hyalotubeufia&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;Pseudocirrenalia&lt;/i&gt;, and &lt;i&gt;Pseudohelicosporium&lt;/i&gt; and 53 new species, viz&lt;i&gt;. Acrohelicosporium abundatum&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;A&lt;/i&gt;. &lt;i&gt;aquaticum&lt;/i&gt;,&lt;i&gt; A&lt;/i&gt;. &lt;i&gt;guizhouense&lt;/i&gt;,&lt;i&gt; A&lt;/i&gt;. &lt;i&gt;viridisporum&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;Berkleasmium hainanense&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;Helicoma brunneum&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;H&lt;/i&gt;. &lt;i&gt;astrictum&lt;/i&gt;,&lt;i&gt; H&lt;/i&gt;. &lt;i&gt;dipterocarpi&lt;/i&gt;,&lt;i&gt; H&lt;/i&gt;. &lt;i&gt;guizhouense&lt;/i&gt;,&lt;i&gt; H&lt;/i&gt;. &lt;i&gt;sclerotiferum&lt;/i&gt;,&lt;i&gt; H&lt;/i&gt;. &lt;i&gt;tropicum&lt;/i&gt;,&lt;i&gt; H&lt;/i&gt;. &lt;i&gt;yinggelingense&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;Helicoma yunnanense&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;Helicosporium acropleurogenum&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;H. brunneisporum&lt;/i&gt;,&lt;i&gt; H&lt;/i&gt;. &lt;i&gt;changjiangense&lt;/i&gt;,&lt;i&gt; H&lt;/i&gt;. &lt;i&gt;jiangkouense&lt;/i&gt;,&lt;i&gt; H&lt;/i&gt;. &lt;i&gt;latisporum&lt;/i&gt;,&lt;i&gt; H&lt;/i&gt;. &lt;i&gt;ramosiphorum&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;Helicotubeufia laxisporum&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;Hyalohelicoon multiseptatum&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;Hyalohelisphora lignicola&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;Neohelicomyces acropleurogenus&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;N&lt;/i&gt;. &lt;i&gt;aseptatus&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;N&lt;/i&gt;. &lt;i&gt;edgeworthiae&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;N&lt;/i&gt;. &lt;i&gt;guttulatus&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;N&lt;/i&gt;. &lt;i&gt;lignicola&lt;/i&gt;,&lt;i&gt; N&lt;/i&gt;. &lt;i&gt;macrosporus&lt;/i&gt;,&lt;i&gt; N&lt;/i&gt;. &lt;i&gt;qixingyaensis&lt;/i&gt;,&lt;i&gt; N&lt;/i&gt;. &lt;i&gt;xiayadongensis&lt;/i&gt;,&lt;i&gt; N&lt;/i&gt;. &lt;i&gt;yunnanensis&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;N&lt;/i&gt;. &lt;i&gt;baihualingense&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;Neohelicosporium hainanense&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;N&lt;/i&gt;. &lt;i&gt;jianfenglingense&lt;/i&gt;,&lt;i&gt; N&lt;/i&gt;. &lt;i&gt;latisporum&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;Parahelicomyces latisporus&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;Pa&lt;/i&gt;. &lt;i&gt;laxisporus&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;Pa&lt;/i&gt;. &lt;i&gt;parvisporus&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;Paratrimmatostroma helicosporum&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;Pleurohelicosporium brunneisporum&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;Pl&lt;/i&gt;. &lt;i&gt;hyalosporum&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;Pl&lt;/i&gt;. &lt;i&gt;multiseptatum&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;Pseudocirrenalia aquialpina&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;Pseudohelicosporium irregular&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;Ps&lt;/i&gt;. &lt;i&gt;laxisporum&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;Pseudotubeufia dematiolaxispora&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;Sclerococcum astrictum&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;Tubeufia acropleurogena&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;T&lt;/i&gt;. &lt;i&gt;baomeilingensis&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;T&lt;/i&gt;. &lt;i&gt;denticulate&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;T&lt;/i&gt;. &lt;i&gt;subrenis","PeriodicalId":12471,"journal":{"name":"Fungal Diversity","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":20.3,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142825713","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Ophiostomatoid fungi associated with Ips bark beetles in China 与中国白皮甲虫有关的类蛇口真菌
IF 20.3 1区 生物学 Q1 MYCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-12-11 DOI: 10.1007/s13225-024-00546-7
Zheng Wang, Lingyu Liang, Huimin Wang, Cony Decock, Quan Lu

Ips is a genus of bark beetles found throughout the Northern Hemisphere, many of which are highly destructive to coniferous forests and plantations. Fungal symbionts, especially ophiostomatoid fungi, have contributed to the success of Ips bark beetles. Recently, climate change accelerated tree mortality caused by bark beetles and their fungal symbionts. However, the knowledge of ophiostomatoid fungi associated with Ips bark beetles is inadequate in China. Therefore, this study investigated the ophiostomatoid fungal communities associated with different Ips bark beetles from various coniferous forest areas of China. A total of 14,512 ophiostomatoid fungal strains were isolated from 1265 vigorous adult beetles and 826 fresh galleries belonging to 11 Ips species infesting 16 coniferous tree species, including pines, spruces, and larches, from 42 sampling sites in nine provinces or autonomous regions in northeast, northwest and southwest China. Based on a combination of morphological features and phylogenetic analysis, 71 taxa belonging to eight genera were identified (Ceratocystiopsis, Graphilbum, Grosmannia, Leptographium, Masuyamyces, and Ophiostoma in Ophiostomatales; Endoconidiophora and Graphium in Microascales), of which 38 species were described as new. Comparing patterns of fungal assemblages indicated that fungal symbionts genetically co-differentiated with their vectors. Host trees possibly reinforce the coarse species-specific association between ophiostomatoid fungi and Ips bark beetles. This study further demonstrates the high diversity of ophiostomatoid fungi associated with Ips bark beetles and provides insights into their symbiotic associations.

Ips是一种遍布北半球的树皮甲虫属,其中许多对针叶林和种植园具有高度破坏性。真菌共生体,特别是类蛇口真菌,对Ips树皮甲虫的成功做出了贡献。最近,气候变化加速了由树皮甲虫及其真菌共生体引起的树木死亡。然而,国内对与Ips树皮甲虫相关的类蛇口真菌的认识还不充分。因此,本研究调查了中国不同针叶林地区不同Ips树皮甲虫相关的类蛇口真菌群落。在东北、西北和西南9个省(自治区)的42个采样点,从11种成虫1265株和826株鲜虫中分离出14512株类蛇口真菌,侵染松树、云杉、落叶松等16种针叶树。基于形态学特征和系统发育分析,鉴定出8属71个类群(蛇鼻藿属中的Ceratocystiopsis、Graphilbum、Grosmannia、Leptographium、Masuyamyces和Ophiostoma);微鳞片内内生孢子虫属(Endoconidiophora)和石墨属(grapum in microas鳞片),其中38种为新种。真菌组合模式的比较表明,真菌共生体与其载体存在共分化。寄主树可能加强了类蛇口真菌和Ips树皮甲虫之间的粗略的物种特异性联系。该研究进一步证明了与Ips树皮甲虫相关的类蛇口真菌的高度多样性,并为它们的共生关系提供了见解。
{"title":"Ophiostomatoid fungi associated with Ips bark beetles in China","authors":"Zheng Wang, Lingyu Liang, Huimin Wang, Cony Decock, Quan Lu","doi":"10.1007/s13225-024-00546-7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-024-00546-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><i>Ips</i> is a genus of bark beetles found throughout the Northern Hemisphere, many of which are highly destructive to coniferous forests and plantations. Fungal symbionts, especially ophiostomatoid fungi, have contributed to the success of <i>Ips</i> bark beetles. Recently, climate change accelerated tree mortality caused by bark beetles and their fungal symbionts. However, the knowledge of ophiostomatoid fungi associated with <i>Ips</i> bark beetles is inadequate in China. Therefore, this study investigated the ophiostomatoid fungal communities associated with different <i>Ips</i> bark beetles from various coniferous forest areas of China. A total of 14,512 ophiostomatoid fungal strains were isolated from 1265 vigorous adult beetles and 826 fresh galleries belonging to 11 <i>Ips</i> species infesting 16 coniferous tree species, including pines, spruces, and larches, from 42 sampling sites in nine provinces or autonomous regions in northeast, northwest and southwest China. Based on a combination of morphological features and phylogenetic analysis, 71 taxa belonging to eight genera were identified (<i>Ceratocystiopsis</i>, <i>Graphilbum</i>, <i>Grosmannia</i>, <i>Leptographium</i>, <i>Masuyamyces</i>, and <i>Ophiostoma</i> in Ophiostomatales; <i>Endoconidiophora</i> and <i>Graphium</i> in Microascales), of which 38 species were described as new. Comparing patterns of fungal assemblages indicated that fungal symbionts genetically co-differentiated with their vectors. Host trees possibly reinforce the coarse species-specific association between ophiostomatoid fungi and <i>Ips</i> bark beetles. This study further demonstrates the high diversity of ophiostomatoid fungi associated with <i>Ips</i> bark beetles and provides insights into their symbiotic associations.</p>","PeriodicalId":12471,"journal":{"name":"Fungal Diversity","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":20.3,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142809686","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Notes, outline, taxonomy and phylogeny of brown-spored hyphomycetes 褐孢子菌丝的注释、概述、分类和系统发育
IF 20.3 1区 生物学 Q1 MYCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-11-28 DOI: 10.1007/s13225-024-00539-6
Ning-Guo Liu, Kevin D. Hyde, Ya-Ru Sun, D. Jayarama Bhat, E. B. Gareth Jones, Juangjun Jumpathong, Chuan-Gen Lin, Yong-Zhong Lu, Jing Yang, Ling-Ling Liu, Zuo-Yi Liu, Jian-Kui Liu

Hyphomycetes are asexually reproducing parts in a fungal life cycle, and is an artificial classification. Hyphomycetes are fungi with diverse lifestyles, including saprobes, endophytes, plant and animal pathogens, hyperparasites, lichenized forms and extremophiles. Traditionally, morphological characters have been used to identify and classify hyphomycetes, which has led to many taxonomic controversies. Modern molecular methods based on DNA sequence data have developed a more reliable and natural classification of hyphomycetes. The present study revises the taxonomy of the brown-spored hyphomycetes based on both morphology and phylogeny. In total, 1,041 genera with brief notes are provided. Of these, 1,032 genera belong to Ascomycota (Dothideomycetes: 362; Eurotiomycetes: 34; Leotiomycetes: 22; Pezizomycetes: 7; Sordariomycetes: 210; Ascomycota genera incertae sedis: 397), and nine genera belong to Basidiomycota. In addition, 363 brown-spored hyphomycetous genera published since 2010 are listed. Multi-locus phylogeny, including 658 brown-spored hyphomycete genera within Ascomycota, are carried out using 28S nrDNA, 18S nrDNA and RNA polymerase II second largest subunit (rpb2), and the results show that 374 genera are phylogenetically placed in Dothideomycetes, 39 genera in Eurotiomycetes, 26 genera in Leotiomycetes, 6 genera in Pezizomycetes and 213 genera in Sordariomycetes. Based on the morphology and multi-gene phylogeny, 45 fresh collections are described in this study, including seven new genera, viz. Murihylinia, Pseudobrachysporiella, Saprosporodochifer, Solitariconidiophora, Tenebrosynnematica, Xenoberkleasmium, Xenostanjehughesia; 17 new species, viz. Acrodictys thailandica, Alfaria fusiformis, Conioscypha punctiformis, Gamsomyces breve, Murihylinia guizhouensis, Parafuscosporella atricolor, Pleocatenata thailandica, Polyplosphaeria appendiculata, Pseudobrachysporiella pyriforme, Saprosporodochifer fuscus, Solitariconidiophora guizhouensis, Sporidesmiella obovoidispora, Stachybotrys ellipsoidea, Tenebrosynnematica obclavata, Vanakripa obovoidea, Xenoberkleasmium chiangraiense, Yunnanomyces muriformis; one new combination, viz. Xenostanjehughesia polypora; nine new records, viz. Aquatisphaeria thailandica, Bahusandhika indica, Corynespora submersa, Fusariella sinensis, Helicodochium aquaticum, Pleopunctum ellipsoideum, Rhexoacrodictys erecta, Vikalpa dujuanhuensis, Virgaria nigra. Detailed descriptions and morphological illustrations are provided for these new taxa. Current taxonomic difficulties are discussed.

菌丝菌是真菌生命周期中无性繁殖的部分,是一种人工分类。菌丝菌是一种生活方式多样的真菌,包括腐殖菌、内生菌、植物和动物病原体、超寄生虫、地衣菌和极端微生物。传统上,形态学特征被用来鉴定和分类菌丝,这导致了许多分类上的争议。基于DNA序列数据的现代分子方法已经开发出一种更可靠和自然的丝孢菌分类方法。本研究在形态学和系统发育的基础上对褐孢菌丝的分类进行了修订。共提供了1 041个属和简要注释。其中,子囊菌门1032属(Dothideomycetes: 362属;Eurotiomycetes: 34;Leotiomycetes: 22;Pezizomycetes: 7;Sordariomycetes: 210;子囊菌属(inintertae seis): 397属,担子菌属9属。此外,还列出了自2010年以来发表的363种褐孢菌丝属。利用28S nrDNA、18S nrDNA和RNA聚合酶II第二大亚基(rpb2)对子囊菌门内658个褐孢丝孢菌属进行了多位点系统发育,结果表明,在系统发育上,Dothideomycetes中有374个属,Eurotiomycetes中有39个属,Leotiomycetes中有26个属,Pezizomycetes中有6个属,Sordariomycetes中有213个属。基于形态学和多基因系统发育,本文共获得45个新属,包括7个新属:Murihylinia、Pseudobrachysporiella、Saprosporodochifer、Solitariconidiophora、Tenebrosynnematica、Xenoberkleasmium、Xenostanjehughesia;新增17个新种:泰国顶孢子虫、鹅毛飞虱、点状孢子虫、短芽生孢子虫、贵州毛孢子虫、彩色副孢子虫、泰国多孢子虫、尾尾多孢子虫、梨形假短孢子虫、镰刀孢子虫、贵州单孢子虫、倒卵形孢子虫、椭圆孢子虫、黑斑拟虫、倒卵形Vanakripa obovoidea、江源异孢子虫、云南多孢子虫;一个新组合,即Xenostanjehughesia polypora;9个新记录:泰国水藻、印度Bahusandhika indica、潜水Corynespora diving、中华Fusariella sinensis、水藻Helicodochium aquatimicum aquatimicum ellipsoideum Pleopunctum erecrhocrodicys erecta、dujuanhuensis Vikalpa、virgia nigra。对这些新分类群进行了详细的描述和形态图解。讨论了目前分类学上的困难。
{"title":"Notes, outline, taxonomy and phylogeny of brown-spored hyphomycetes","authors":"Ning-Guo Liu, Kevin D. Hyde, Ya-Ru Sun, D. Jayarama Bhat, E. B. Gareth Jones, Juangjun Jumpathong, Chuan-Gen Lin, Yong-Zhong Lu, Jing Yang, Ling-Ling Liu, Zuo-Yi Liu, Jian-Kui Liu","doi":"10.1007/s13225-024-00539-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-024-00539-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Hyphomycetes are asexually reproducing parts in a fungal life cycle, and is an artificial classification. Hyphomycetes are fungi with diverse lifestyles, including saprobes, endophytes, plant and animal pathogens, hyperparasites, lichenized forms and extremophiles. Traditionally, morphological characters have been used to identify and classify hyphomycetes, which has led to many taxonomic controversies. Modern molecular methods based on DNA sequence data have developed a more reliable and natural classification of hyphomycetes. The present study revises the taxonomy of the brown-spored hyphomycetes based on both morphology and phylogeny. In total, 1,041 genera with brief notes are provided. Of these, 1,032 genera belong to <i>Ascomycota</i> (<i>Dothideomycetes</i>: 362; <i>Eurotiomycetes</i>: 34; <i>Leotiomycetes</i>: 22; <i>Pezizomycetes</i>: 7; <i>Sordariomycetes</i>: 210; <i>Ascomycota</i> genera <i>incertae sedis</i>: 397), and nine genera belong to <i>Basidiomycota</i>. In addition, 363 brown-spored hyphomycetous genera published since 2010 are listed. Multi-locus phylogeny, including 658 brown-spored hyphomycete genera within <i>Ascomycota</i>, are carried out using 28S nrDNA, 18S nrDNA and RNA polymerase II second largest subunit (<i>rpb2</i>), and the results show that 374 genera are phylogenetically placed in <i>Dothideomycetes</i>, 39 genera in <i>Eurotiomycetes</i>, 26 genera in <i>Leotiomycetes</i>, 6 genera in <i>Pezizomycetes</i> and 213 genera in <i>Sordariomycetes</i>. Based on the morphology and multi-gene phylogeny, 45 fresh collections are described in this study, including seven new genera, viz<i>. Murihylinia</i>, <i>Pseudobrachysporiella</i>, <i>Saprosporodochifer</i>, <i>Solitariconidiophora</i>, <i>Tenebrosynnematica</i>, <i>Xenoberkleasmium</i>, <i>Xenostanjehughesia</i>; 17 new species, viz. <i>Acrodictys thailandica</i>, <i>Alfaria fusiformis</i>, <i>Conioscypha punctiformis</i>, <i>Gamsomyces breve</i>, <i>Murihylinia guizhouensis</i>, <i>Parafuscosporella atricolor</i>, <i>Pleocatenata thailandica</i>, <i>Polyplosphaeria appendiculata</i>, <i>Pseudobrachysporiella pyriforme</i>, <i>Saprosporodochifer fuscus</i>, <i>Solitariconidiophora guizhouensis</i>, <i>Sporidesmiella obovoidispora</i>, <i>Stachybotrys ellipsoidea</i>, <i>Tenebrosynnematica obclavata</i>, <i>Vanakripa obovoidea</i>, <i>Xenoberkleasmium chiangraiense</i>, <i>Yunnanomyces muriformis</i>; one new combination, viz. <i>Xenostanjehughesia polypora</i>; nine new records, viz. <i>Aquatisphaeria thailandica</i>, <i>Bahusandhika indica</i>, <i>Corynespora submersa</i>, <i>Fusariella sinensis</i>, <i>Helicodochium aquaticum</i>, <i>Pleopunctum ellipsoideum</i>, <i>Rhexoacrodictys erecta</i>, <i>Vikalpa dujuanhuensis</i>, <i>Virgaria nigra</i>. Detailed descriptions and morphological illustrations are provided for these new taxa. Current taxonomic difficulties are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":12471,"journal":{"name":"Fungal Diversity","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":20.3,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142753702","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Microsporidia and invertebrate hosts: genome-informed taxonomy surrounding a new lineage of crayfish-infecting Nosema spp. (Nosematida) 小孢子虫和无脊椎动物宿主:围绕感染小龙虾的诺斯玛属(诺斯玛目)新品系的基因组信息分类法
IF 20.3 1区 生物学 Q1 MYCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-11-11 DOI: 10.1007/s13225-024-00543-w
Cheyenne E. Stratton, Sara A. Bolds, Lindsey S. Reisinger, Donald C. Behringer, Amjad Khalaf, Jamie Bojko

The Microsporidia, an often overlooked fungal lineage, exhibit increasing diversity and taxonomic understanding with the use of genomic techniques. They are obligate parasites infecting a diversity of hosts, including crustaceans. Crustacea are, in essence, ancient insects and their relationship with the Microsporidia is both diverse and convoluted. Relationships between crayfish and their microsporidian parasites display geospatial and taxonomic diversity. Through classical (histological, ultrastructural, developmental) and genomic (phylogenetic, phylogenomic) approaches, we expand the known diversity of crayfish-infecting microsporidia into the genus Nosema by describing three novel species from North America: Nosema astafloridana n. sp. infecting Procambarus pictus and Procambarus spiculifer, Nosema rusticus n. sp. infecting Faxonius rusticus, and Nosema wisconsinii n. sp. infecting Faxonius propinquus and Faxonius virilis. Additionally, we provide SSU sequence data for further Nosema diversity from Procambarus clarkii and Pacifasticus gambelii. The taxonomy of aquatic crustacean-infecting Nosema have been under scrutiny among microsporidiologists—using genomic data we solidify this systematic relationship. Our genomic data reveal phylogenomic divergence between terrestrial insect-infecting Nosema and aquatic crustacean-infecting Nosema but place our novel species within the Nosema. Comparative genomic analysis reveal that Nosema rusticus n. sp. is a tetraploid organism, making this the first known polyploid from the genus Nosema. Annotation of the genomic data highlight that crayfish-infecting Nosema have distinct proteomic differences when compared to amphipod and insect-infecting microsporidians. Alongside the new diversity uncovered and genome-supported systematics, we consider the role of these new ‘invasive’ parasites in biological invasion systems, exploring their relationship with their invasive hosts.

小孢子虫是一个经常被忽视的真菌门类,随着基因组学技术的应用,其多样性和分类学知识日益丰富。它们是感染包括甲壳动物在内的多种宿主的强制性寄生虫。甲壳动物本质上是古老的昆虫,它们与小孢子虫的关系既多样又复杂。小龙虾与其小孢子虫寄生虫之间的关系呈现出地理空间和分类学上的多样性。通过经典(组织学、超微结构学、发育学)和基因组学(系统发育学、系统基因组学)方法,我们描述了来自北美洲的三个新物种,从而扩展了小龙虾感染小孢子虫属的已知多样性:感染Procambarus pictus和Procambarus spiculifer的Nosema astafloridana n. sp.、感染Faxonius rusticus的Nosema rusticus n. sp.以及感染Faxonius propinquus和Faxonius virilis的Nosema wisconsinii n. sp.。此外,我们还提供了SSU序列数据,以进一步丰富Procambarus clarkii和Pacifasticus gambelii的Nosema多样性。水生甲壳动物感染的诺斯马氏菌的分类一直受到微孢子虫学家的关注--利用基因组数据,我们巩固了这种系统关系。我们的基因组数据揭示了陆生昆虫感染诺斯马属真菌和水生甲壳动物感染诺斯马属真菌之间的系统发育分化,但将我们的新物种归入了诺斯马属真菌。比较基因组分析表明,Nosema rusticus n. sp.是一种四倍体生物,是已知的第一个Nosema属多倍体。对基因组数据的注释突出表明,与片脚类动物和昆虫感染的微孢子虫相比,小龙虾感染的诺斯马属具有明显的蛋白质组差异。除了发现新的多样性和基因组支持的系统学之外,我们还考虑了这些新的 "入侵 "寄生虫在生物入侵系统中的作用,探讨了它们与入侵宿主的关系。
{"title":"Microsporidia and invertebrate hosts: genome-informed taxonomy surrounding a new lineage of crayfish-infecting Nosema spp. (Nosematida)","authors":"Cheyenne E. Stratton, Sara A. Bolds, Lindsey S. Reisinger, Donald C. Behringer, Amjad Khalaf, Jamie Bojko","doi":"10.1007/s13225-024-00543-w","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-024-00543-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Microsporidia, an often overlooked fungal lineage, exhibit increasing diversity and taxonomic understanding with the use of genomic techniques. They are obligate parasites infecting a diversity of hosts, including crustaceans. Crustacea are, in essence, ancient insects and their relationship with the Microsporidia is both diverse and convoluted. Relationships between crayfish and their microsporidian parasites display geospatial and taxonomic diversity. Through classical (histological, ultrastructural, developmental) and genomic (phylogenetic, phylogenomic) approaches, we expand the known diversity of crayfish-infecting microsporidia into the genus <i>Nosema</i> by describing three novel species from North America: <i>Nosema astafloridana</i> n. sp. infecting <i>Procambarus pictus</i> and <i>Procambarus spiculifer</i>, <i>Nosema rusticus</i> n. sp. infecting <i>Faxonius rusticus</i>, and <i>Nosema wisconsinii</i> n. sp. infecting <i>Faxonius propinquus</i> and <i>Faxonius virilis</i>. Additionally, we provide SSU sequence data for further <i>Nosema</i> diversity from <i>Procambarus clarkii</i> and <i>Pacifasticus gambelii</i>. The taxonomy of aquatic crustacean-infecting <i>Nosema</i> have been under scrutiny among microsporidiologists—using genomic data we solidify this systematic relationship. Our genomic data reveal phylogenomic divergence between terrestrial insect-infecting <i>Nosema</i> and aquatic crustacean-infecting <i>Nosema</i> but place our novel species within the <i>Nosema</i>. Comparative genomic analysis reveal that <i>Nosema rusticus</i> n. sp. is a tetraploid organism, making this the first known polyploid from the genus <i>Nosema</i>. Annotation of the genomic data highlight that crayfish-infecting <i>Nosema</i> have distinct proteomic differences when compared to amphipod and insect-infecting microsporidians. Alongside the new diversity uncovered and genome-supported systematics, we consider the role of these new ‘invasive’ parasites in biological invasion systems, exploring their relationship with their invasive hosts.</p>","PeriodicalId":12471,"journal":{"name":"Fungal Diversity","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":20.3,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142599658","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Fungal numbers: global needs for a realistic assessment 真菌数量:全球对现实评估的需求
IF 20.3 1区 生物学 Q1 MYCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-11-07 DOI: 10.1007/s13225-024-00545-8
Kevin D. Hyde, Alwasel Saleh, Herbert Dustin R. Aumentado, Teun Boekhout, Ishika Bera, Sabin Khyaju, Chitrabhanu S. Bhunjun, K. W. Thilini Chethana, Chayanard Phukhamsakda, Mingkwan Doilom, Vinodhini Thiyagaraja, Peter E. Mortimer, Sajeewa S. N. Maharachchikumbura, Sinang Hongsanan, Ruvishika S. Jayawardena, Wei Dong, Rajesh Jeewon, Fatimah Al-Otibi, Subodini N. Wijesinghe, Dhanushka N. Wanasinghe

Estimates of global fungal diversity have varied widely, suggesting a range from fewer than one million to over 10 million species, with each of the estimates drawing data from various criteria. In 2022, Fungal Diversity published a special issue on fungal numbers. It had been hoped that the editorial would provide a more accurate account of the numbers of fungi. Instead, it was concluded that this was not possible based on present evidence and, some of the data necessary for accurate assessments was put forward, and the present paper expands on this short article. The review first looks at estimates of fungal numbers and what these estimates are based on. It then presents future research needs that will help us to gain a more accurate estimate of fungal numbers. This includes work that needs to be done in tropical rainforests, where the greatest diversity is expected, where whole rainforests, canopy diversity, and palm fungi are addressed. Case studies for lichens and associated fungi, soil and litter fungi, evidence from particle filtration, freshwater fungi, marine fungi, mushrooms, and yeasts will also be given. Once we have such information, we can obtain a more accurate estimate of fungal numbers.

对全球真菌多样性的估计差异很大,从不到一百万到超过一千万种不等,每种估计都从不同的标准中提取数据。2022 年,《真菌多样性》出版了一期关于真菌数量的特刊。人们曾希望这篇社论能对真菌的数量做出更准确的描述。但社论的结论是,根据目前的证据不可能做到这一点,并提出了准确评估所需的一些数据,本文就是在这篇短文的基础上进一步阐述的。本综述首先探讨了真菌数量的估计值以及这些估计值的依据。然后介绍了未来的研究需求,这将有助于我们更准确地估算真菌数量。这包括需要在热带雨林中开展的工作,因为热带雨林的多样性预计是最丰富的,其中涉及整个雨林、树冠多样性和棕榈真菌。此外,还将对地衣和相关真菌、土壤和垃圾真菌、颗粒过滤证据、淡水真菌、海洋真菌、蘑菇和酵母菌进行案例研究。一旦掌握了这些信息,我们就能更准确地估计真菌的数量。
{"title":"Fungal numbers: global needs for a realistic assessment","authors":"Kevin D. Hyde, Alwasel Saleh, Herbert Dustin R. Aumentado, Teun Boekhout, Ishika Bera, Sabin Khyaju, Chitrabhanu S. Bhunjun, K. W. Thilini Chethana, Chayanard Phukhamsakda, Mingkwan Doilom, Vinodhini Thiyagaraja, Peter E. Mortimer, Sajeewa S. N. Maharachchikumbura, Sinang Hongsanan, Ruvishika S. Jayawardena, Wei Dong, Rajesh Jeewon, Fatimah Al-Otibi, Subodini N. Wijesinghe, Dhanushka N. Wanasinghe","doi":"10.1007/s13225-024-00545-8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-024-00545-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Estimates of global fungal diversity have varied widely, suggesting a range from fewer than one million to over 10 million species, with each of the estimates drawing data from various criteria. In 2022, <i>Fungal Diversity</i> published a special issue on fungal numbers. It had been hoped that the editorial would provide a more accurate account of the numbers of fungi. Instead, it was concluded that this was not possible based on present evidence and, some of the data necessary for accurate assessments was put forward, and the present paper expands on this short article. The review first looks at estimates of fungal numbers and what these estimates are based on. It then presents future research needs that will help us to gain a more accurate estimate of fungal numbers. This includes work that needs to be done in tropical rainforests, where the greatest diversity is expected, where whole rainforests, canopy diversity, and palm fungi are addressed. Case studies for lichens and associated fungi, soil and litter fungi, evidence from particle filtration, freshwater fungi, marine fungi, mushrooms, and yeasts will also be given. Once we have such information, we can obtain a more accurate estimate of fungal numbers.</p>","PeriodicalId":12471,"journal":{"name":"Fungal Diversity","volume":"140 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":20.3,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142594428","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Classes and phyla of the kingdom Fungi 真菌界的类和门
IF 20.3 1区 生物学 Q1 MYCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-15 DOI: 10.1007/s13225-024-00540-z
Nalin N. Wijayawardene, Kevin D. Hyde, Kirill V. Mikhailov, Gábor Péter, André Aptroot, Carmen L. A. Pires-Zottarelli, Bruno T. Goto, Yuri S. Tokarev, Danny Haelewaters, Samantha C. Karunarathna, Paul M. Kirk, André L. C. M. de A. Santiago, Ramesh K. Saxena, Nathan Schoutteten, Madhara K. Wimalasena, Vladimir V. Aleoshin, Abdullah M. S. Al-Hatmi, Kahandawa G. S. U. Ariyawansa, Amanda R. Assunção, Thushara C. Bamunuarachchige, Hans-Otto Baral, D. Jayarama Bhat, Janusz Błaszkowski, Teun Boekhout, Nattawut Boonyuen, Michael Brysch-Herzberg, Bin Cao, Jonathan Cazabonne, Xue-Mei Chen, Claudia Coleine, Dong-Qin Dai, Heide-Marie Daniel, Suzana B. G. da Silva, Francisco Adriano de Souza, Somayeh Dolatabadi, Manish K. Dubey, Arun K. Dutta, Aseni Ediriweera, Eleonora Egidi, Mostafa S. Elshahed, Xinlei Fan, Juliana R. B. Felix, Mahesh C. A. Galappaththi, Marizeth Groenewald, Li-Su Han, Bo Huang, Vedprakash G. Hurdeal, Anastasia N. Ignatieva, Gustavo H. Jerônimo, Ana L. de Jesus, Serhii ..

Fungi are one of the most diverse groups of organisms with an estimated number of species in the range of 2–3 million. The higher-level ranking of fungi has been discussed in the framework of molecular phylogenetics since Hibbett et al., and the definition and the higher ranks (e.g., phyla) of the ‘true fungi’ have been revised in several subsequent publications. Rapid accumulation of novel genomic data and the advancements in phylogenetics now facilitate a robust and precise foundation for the higher-level classification within the kingdom. This study provides an updated classification of the kingdom Fungi, drawing upon a comprehensive phylogenomic analysis of Holomycota, with which we outline well-supported nodes of the fungal tree and explore more contentious groupings. We accept 19 phyla of Fungi, viz. Aphelidiomycota, Ascomycota, Basidiobolomycota, Basidiomycota, Blastocladiomycota, Calcarisporiellomycota, Chytridiomycota, Entomophthoromycota, Entorrhizomycota, Glomeromycota, Kickxellomycota, Monoblepharomycota, Mortierellomycota, Mucoromycota, Neocallimastigomycota, Olpidiomycota, Rozellomycota, Sanchytriomycota, and Zoopagomycota. In the phylogenies, Caulochytriomycota resides in Chytridiomycota; thus, the former is regarded as a synonym of the latter, while Caulochytriomycetes is viewed as a class in Chytridiomycota. We provide a description of each phylum followed by its classes. A new subphylum, Sanchytriomycotina Karpov is introduced as the only subphylum in Sanchytriomycota. The subclass Pneumocystomycetidae Kirk et al. in Pneumocystomycetes, Ascomycota is invalid and thus validated. Placements of fossil fungi in phyla and classes are also discussed, providing examples.

真菌是最多样化的生物类群之一,物种数量估计在 200 万到 300 万种之间。自 Hibbett 等人以来,人们一直在分子系统发育学的框架内讨论真菌的高层次等级,随后的一些出版物对 "真正真菌 "的定义和高层次等级(如门)进行了修订。新基因组数据的快速积累和系统发生学的进步为真菌王国的高级分类奠定了坚实而精确的基础。本研究通过对全菌纲进行全面的系统发生学分析,对真菌王国的分类进行了更新。我们认为真菌有 19 个门类,即Aphelidiomycota, Ascomycota, Basidiobolomycota, Basidiomycota, Blastocladiomycota, Calcarisporiellomycota, Chytridiomycota, Entomophthoromycota, Entorrhizomycota、Glomeromycota, Kickxellomycota, Monoblepharomycota, Mortierellomycota, Mucoromycota, Neocallimastigomycota, Olpidiomycota, Rozellomycota, Sanchytriomycota, and Zoopagomycota。在系统发育中,Caulochytriomycota 位于 Chytridiomycota 中;因此,前者被视为后者的同义词,而 Caulochytriomycetes 则被视为 Chytridiomycota 中的一个类。我们对每一个门进行了描述,然后介绍了其类别。新的亚门 Sanchytriomycotina Karpov 是 Sanchytriomycota 中唯一的亚门。Ascomycota 的 Pneumocystomycetes 中的 Pneumocystomycetidae 亚门 Kirk 等人的分类无效,因此得到了验证。还讨论了化石真菌在门和类中的位置,并提供了实例。
{"title":"Classes and phyla of the kingdom Fungi","authors":"Nalin N. Wijayawardene, Kevin D. Hyde, Kirill V. Mikhailov, Gábor Péter, André Aptroot, Carmen L. A. Pires-Zottarelli, Bruno T. Goto, Yuri S. Tokarev, Danny Haelewaters, Samantha C. Karunarathna, Paul M. Kirk, André L. C. M. de A. Santiago, Ramesh K. Saxena, Nathan Schoutteten, Madhara K. Wimalasena, Vladimir V. Aleoshin, Abdullah M. S. Al-Hatmi, Kahandawa G. S. U. Ariyawansa, Amanda R. Assunção, Thushara C. Bamunuarachchige, Hans-Otto Baral, D. Jayarama Bhat, Janusz Błaszkowski, Teun Boekhout, Nattawut Boonyuen, Michael Brysch-Herzberg, Bin Cao, Jonathan Cazabonne, Xue-Mei Chen, Claudia Coleine, Dong-Qin Dai, Heide-Marie Daniel, Suzana B. G. da Silva, Francisco Adriano de Souza, Somayeh Dolatabadi, Manish K. Dubey, Arun K. Dutta, Aseni Ediriweera, Eleonora Egidi, Mostafa S. Elshahed, Xinlei Fan, Juliana R. B. Felix, Mahesh C. A. Galappaththi, Marizeth Groenewald, Li-Su Han, Bo Huang, Vedprakash G. Hurdeal, Anastasia N. Ignatieva, Gustavo H. Jerônimo, Ana L. de Jesus, Serhii ..","doi":"10.1007/s13225-024-00540-z","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-024-00540-z","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Fungi are one of the most diverse groups of organisms with an estimated number of species in the range of 2–3 million. The higher-level ranking of fungi has been discussed in the framework of molecular phylogenetics since Hibbett et al., and the definition and the higher ranks (e.g., phyla) of the ‘true fungi’ have been revised in several subsequent publications. Rapid accumulation of novel genomic data and the advancements in phylogenetics now facilitate a robust and precise foundation for the higher-level classification within the kingdom. This study provides an updated classification of the kingdom <i>Fungi</i>, drawing upon a comprehensive phylogenomic analysis of <i>Holomycota</i>, with which we outline well-supported nodes of the fungal tree and explore more contentious groupings. We accept 19 phyla of <i>Fungi,</i> viz<i>. Aphelidiomycota</i>, <i>Ascomycota</i>, <i>Basidiobolomycota</i>, <i>Basidiomycota</i>, <i>Blastocladiomycota</i>, <i>Calcarisporiellomycota</i>, <i>Chytridiomycota</i>, <i>Entomophthoromycota</i>, <i>Entorrhizomycota</i>, <i>Glomeromycota</i>, <i>Kickxellomycota</i>, <i>Monoblepharomycota</i>, <i>Mortierellomycota</i>, <i>Mucoromycota</i>, <i>Neocallimastigomycota</i>, <i>Olpidiomycota</i>, <i>Rozellomycota</i>, <i>Sanchytriomycota,</i> and <i>Zoopagomycota</i>. In the phylogenies, <i>Caulochytriomycota</i> resides in <i>Chytridiomycota</i>; thus, the former is regarded as a synonym of the latter, while <i>Caulochytriomycetes</i> is viewed as a class in <i>Chytridiomycota</i>. We provide a description of each phylum followed by its classes. A new subphylum, <i>Sanchytriomycotina</i> Karpov is introduced as the only subphylum in <i>Sanchytriomycota</i>. The subclass <i>Pneumocystomycetidae</i> Kirk et al. in <i>Pneumocystomycetes</i>, <i>Ascomycota</i> is invalid and thus validated. Placements of fossil fungi in phyla and classes are also discussed, providing examples.</p>","PeriodicalId":12471,"journal":{"name":"Fungal Diversity","volume":"44 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":20.3,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142440209","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Taxonomic revision of Marasmius Fr. and Marasmiaceae Roze ex Kühner based on multigene phylogenetics and morphological evidence 基于多基因系统学和形态学证据的 Marasmius Fr. 和 Marasmiaceae Roze ex Kühner 的分类学修订
IF 20.3 1区 生物学 Q1 MYCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-07-30 DOI: 10.1007/s13225-024-00534-x
Jadson J. S. Oliveira, Dennis E. Desjardin, Thomas S. Jenkinson, Simona Margaritescu, Marina Capelari, Jean-Marc Moncalvo

Many taxonomic and systematic rearrangements were proposed to Marasmius Fr. since its original concept in 1835, and since 1980 when it became the type of Marasmiaceae. These were based on morphological and/or more recently molecular phylogenetic studies. This study conducted a comprehensive taxonomic and systematic evaluation of Marasmius that benefits the whole family, implementing multilocus (SSU, LSU, ITS, rpb2 and ef1-α) phylogenetic analyses integrated with morphological and other features. The resulting trees support (1) a Marasmiaceae clade-based circumscription within Marasmiineae, (2) a Marasmius clade-based circumscription within Marasmiaceae, and (3) a subgenus-section-subsection-series system. Two subgenera are proposed: Globulares and Marasmius. Marasmius auton. subgen. includes Crinis-eques sect. nov., sect. Marasmius, Sanguirotales sect. nov., Variabilispori sect. nov., and Sicciformes sect. nov., while Globulares subg. nov. groups sect. Globulares and sect. Sicci. Four subsections are proposed in sect. Globulares and three in sect. Marasmius and sect. Sicciformes. Seventeen series were defined in sect. Globulares and three in sect. Sicci. Selected traits were assessed for their phylogenetic signals within Marasmius, providing a robust framework for a natural system. Based on this analysis, Marasmiaceae includes Chaetocalathus, Crinipellis, Marasmius and Moniliophthora/Paramarasmius, and Campanellaceae fam. nov. includes Brunneocorticium, Campanella/Tetrapyrgos, Neocampanella, and Marasmiellus sect. Candidi. New species, names, combinations and epitypes are also proposed.

Marasmius Fr.自 1835 年提出最初概念以来,以及自 1980 年成为 Marasmiaceae 的类型以来,人们对其提出了许多分类和系统重排建议。这些都是基于形态学和/或最近的分子系统学研究。本研究通过多焦点(SSU、LSU、ITS、rpb2 和 ef1-α)系统发育分析,结合形态学和其他特征,对 Marasmius 进行了全面的分类和系统评估,使整个科受益。结果树支持:(1)Marasmiineae 内基于 Marasmiaceae 支系的圈定;(2)Marasmiaceae 内基于 Marasmius 支系的圈定;以及(3)亚属-科-亚科-系列系统。提出了两个亚属:Globulares 和 Marasmius。Marasmius auton.亚属包括 Crinis-eques sect.Marasmius, Sanguirotales sect.Globulares 和 sect.Sicci.Globulares subg.Globulares 中提出了 4 个亚科,Marasmius 和 sect.Marasmius 和 sect.Sicciformes.在 sect.在 Globulares 节中定义了 17 个系列,在 Sicci 节中定义了 3 个系列。Sicci.对所选性状进行了评估,以确定其在 Marasmius 内的系统发育信号,从而为自然系统提供了一个稳健的框架。根据这一分析,Marasmiaceae 包括 Chaetocalathus、Crinipellis、Marasmius 和 Moniliophthora/Paramarasmius,而 Campanellaceae fam. nov. 包括 Brunneocorticium、Campanella/Tetrapyrgos、Neocampanella 和 Marasmiellus sect.Candidi。还提出了新种、名称、组合和表型。
{"title":"Taxonomic revision of Marasmius Fr. and Marasmiaceae Roze ex Kühner based on multigene phylogenetics and morphological evidence","authors":"Jadson J. S. Oliveira, Dennis E. Desjardin, Thomas S. Jenkinson, Simona Margaritescu, Marina Capelari, Jean-Marc Moncalvo","doi":"10.1007/s13225-024-00534-x","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-024-00534-x","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Many taxonomic and systematic rearrangements were proposed to <i>Marasmius</i> Fr. since its original concept in 1835, and since 1980 when it became the type of Marasmiaceae. These were based on morphological and/or more recently molecular phylogenetic studies. This study conducted a comprehensive taxonomic and systematic evaluation of <i>Marasmius</i> that benefits the whole family, implementing multilocus (SSU, LSU, ITS, <i>rpb2</i> and <i>ef1-α</i>) phylogenetic analyses integrated with morphological and other features. The resulting trees support (1) a Marasmiaceae clade-based circumscription within Marasmiineae, (2) a <i>Marasmius</i> clade-based circumscription within Marasmiaceae, and (3) a subgenus-section-subsection-series system. Two subgenera are proposed: <i>Globulares</i> and <i>Marasmius</i>. <i>Marasmius</i> auton. subgen. includes <i>Crinis-eques</i> sect. nov., sect. <i>Marasmius</i>, <i>Sanguirotales</i> sect. nov., <i>Variabilispori</i> sect. nov., and <i>Sicciformes</i> sect. nov., while <i>Globulares</i> subg. nov. groups sect. <i>Globulares</i> and sect. <i>Sicci</i>. Four subsections are proposed in sect. <i>Globulares</i> and three in sect. <i>Marasmius</i> and sect. <i>Sicciformes</i>. Seventeen series were defined in sect. <i>Globulares</i> and three in sect. <i>Sicci</i>. Selected traits were assessed for their phylogenetic signals within <i>Marasmius</i>, providing a robust framework for a natural system. Based on this analysis, Marasmiaceae includes <i>Chaetocalathus</i>, <i>Crinipellis</i>, <i>Marasmius</i> and <i>Moniliophthora/Paramarasmius</i>, and Campanellaceae fam. nov. includes <i>Brunneocorticium</i>, <i>Campanella/Tetrapyrgos</i>, <i>Neocampanella</i>, and <i>Marasmiellus</i> sect. <i>Candidi</i>. New species, names, combinations and epitypes are also proposed.</p>","PeriodicalId":12471,"journal":{"name":"Fungal Diversity","volume":"85 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":20.3,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141857606","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Current insights into palm fungi with emphasis on taxonomy and phylogeny 目前对棕榈真菌的了解,重点是分类学和系统发育
IF 20.3 1区 生物学 Q1 MYCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-07-15 DOI: 10.1007/s13225-024-00536-9
Sheng-Nan Zhang, Kevin D. Hyde, E. B. Gareth Jones, Xian-Dong Yu, Ratchadawan Cheewangkoon, Jian-Kui Liu
<p>Palms (Arecaceae) are emblems of tropical forests and host a vast array of fungi. The fungi associated with palms have been studied for over two centuries. However, taxonomic identification of some taxa, especially of the prominent genera <i>Anthostomella</i>, <i>Linocarpon</i> and <i>Oxydothis</i>, when based solely on macro- and micro-morphological characteristics is confused and needs better taxonomic resolution. The present study contributes to palm fungal taxonomy by incorporating molecular approaches for fungal identification based on new collections from China and Thailand. In total, 538 samples with 248 successfully obtained fungal isolates were derived from about 23 palm genera. Preliminary analyses showed that these taxa could be recognized as 170 species belonging to 115 genera, 66 families, and three genera <i>incertae sedis</i>. The fungi were mainly distributed in Dothideomycetes (<i>c.</i> 57.6%) and Sordariomycetes (<i>c.</i> 40.6%), with a few Lecanoromycetes (0.6%), Leotiomycetes (0.6%), and Orbiliomycetes (0.6%). In the present study on palm hosts in different ecosystems, it becomes obvious that the biodiversity and specificity of palm fungi is a reflection of habitats more than the hosts or geographical distributions. Based on morpho-phylogenetic evidence, 109 interesting taxa have been illustrated and described, including one new family Pseudocapsulosporaceae, seven new genera and 48 new species. The new genera are <i>Javarisimilis</i> and <i>Thecatisporium</i> (Astrosphaeriellaceae), <i>Neomorosphaeria</i> (Morosphaeriaceae), <i>Pseudocapsulospora</i> (Pseudocapsulosporaceae), <i>Pseudoeutypa</i> (Diatrypaceae), <i>Pseudothailandiomyces</i> (Tirisporellaceae), and <i>Subanthostomella</i> (Xylariales <i>incertae sedis</i>). New species are <i>Anthostomella arecacearum</i>, <i>A. foliatella</i>, <i>A. mangrovei</i>, <i>A. pseudobirima</i>, <i>Brunneiapiospora phoenicis</i>, <i>Diaporthe trachycarpi</i>, <i>Dictyosporium licualae</i>, <i>Ernakulamia palmae</i>, <i>Exosporium licualae</i>, <i>Fasciatispora asexualis</i>, <i>Javarisimilis palmarum</i>, <i>Koorchaloma arecae</i>, <i>Lophodermium nypae</i>, <i>Morenoina rattanica</i>, <i>Nemania palmarum</i>, <i>Neobambusicola palmae</i>, <i>Neodeightonia nypae</i>, <i>Neoeriomycopsis sabal</i>, <i>Neoleptosporella palmae</i>, <i>Neomassaria livistonae</i>, <i>N. palmae</i>, <i>Neomorosphaeria mangrovei</i>, <i>Neosetophoma trachycarpi</i>, <i>Niesslia trachycarpi</i>, <i>Orbilia licualae</i>, <i>Oxydothis caryotae</i>, <i>Ox. foliata</i>, <i>Ox. palmae</i>, <i>Ox. pyriforme, Ox. sinensis</i>, <i>Parateichospora palmarum</i>, <i>Periconia arecacearum</i>, <i>Phaeosphaeria palmae</i>, <i>Phyllosticta arecacearum</i>, <i>P. foliacea</i>, <i>Protocreopsis palmarum</i>, <i>Pseudocapsulospora phoenicis</i>, <i>Ps. rhapidis</i>, <i>Pseudomicrothyrium palmae</i>, <i>Pseudothailandiomyces nypae</i>, <i>Serenomyces phoeniceus</i>, <i>Stanjehughesia elaeidis</i>, <i>Subanthostomella palma
棕榈树(棕榈科)是热带森林的象征,寄生着大量真菌。两个多世纪以来,人们一直在研究与棕榈相关的真菌。然而,仅根据宏观和微观形态特征对一些类群进行分类鉴定,尤其是对著名的 Anthostomella、Linocarpon 和 Oxydothis 属进行分类鉴定,结果令人困惑,需要更好的分类解决方案。本研究以中国和泰国的新采集物为基础,采用分子方法进行真菌鉴定,为棕榈真菌分类学做出了贡献。共采集了 538 个样本,成功获得 248 个真菌分离物,这些分离物来自约 23 个棕榈属。初步分析表明,这些分类群可被确认为 170 种,隶属于 115 属、66 科和 3 个非属。这些真菌主要分布在齿孢菌纲(约占 57.6%)和尾孢菌纲(约占 40.6%)中,还有少量的角孢菌纲(0.6%)、鳞孢菌纲(0.6%)和直枝孢菌纲(0.6%)。通过对不同生态系统中棕榈寄主的研究,可以明显看出,棕榈真菌的生物多样性和特异性是栖息地的反映,而不是寄主或地理分布的反映。基于形态-系统发育证据,109 个有趣的类群已被说明和描述,包括一个新科假囊孢科、7 个新属和 48 个新种。新属包括:Javarisimilis 和 Thecatisporium(天星菌科)、Neomorosphaeria(Morosphaeriaceae)、Pseudocapsulospora(假帽孢科)、Pseudoeutypa(Diatrypaceae)、Pseudothailandiomyces(Tirisporellaceae)和 Subanthostomella(Xylariales incertae sedis)。新种为 Anthostomella arecacearum、A. foliatella、A. mangrovei、A.pseudobirima, Brunneiapiospora phoenicis, Diaporthe trachycarpi, Dictyosporium licualae, Ernakulamia palmae, Exosporium licualae, Fasciatispora asexualis, Javarisimilis palmarum、Koorchaloma arecae、Lophodermium nypae、Morenoina rattanica、Nemania palmarum、Neobambusicola palmae、Neodeightonia nypae、Neoeriomycopsis sabal、Neoleptosporella palmae、Neomassaria livistonae、N.palmae, Neomorosphaeria mangrovei, Neosetophoma trachycarpi, Niesslia trachycarpi, Orbilia licualae, Oxydothis caryotae, Ox.pyriforme、Ox. sinensis、Parateichospora palmarum、Periconia arecacearum、Phaeosphaeria palmae、Phyllosticta arecacearum、P. foliacea、Protocreopsis palmarum、Pseudocapsulospora phoenicis、Ps.rhapidis, Pseudomicrothyrium palmae, Pseudothailandiomyces nypae, Serenomyces phoeniceus, Stanjehughesia elaeidis, Subanthostomella palmae, Tetraploa palmae, T. phoenicis, Thecatisporium palmae, Virgaria palmae, and Yunnanomyces mangrovei.提出了四个物种的新组合。提供了 Appendispora frondicola(Appendispora 的模式种)的新序列和参考标本,支持将该属替换为 Monoblastiaceae。此外还提供了 Anthostomella nypae、Arecophila nypae、Melanographium citri、M. palmicola、M. selenioides 和 Trichobotrys effusus 的参考标本。新的拟真菌物种 Fasciatispora asexualis 是 Fasciatispora 属的第一个无性报告。此外,还首次报道了 Neoeriomycopsis 属和云南霉属的有性形态。此外,专门研究棕榈真菌的海德及其合作者还开发了一个棕榈真菌在线数据库,并将不断更新新的有趣的棕榈真菌。
{"title":"Current insights into palm fungi with emphasis on taxonomy and phylogeny","authors":"Sheng-Nan Zhang, Kevin D. Hyde, E. B. Gareth Jones, Xian-Dong Yu, Ratchadawan Cheewangkoon, Jian-Kui Liu","doi":"10.1007/s13225-024-00536-9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-024-00536-9","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;Palms (Arecaceae) are emblems of tropical forests and host a vast array of fungi. The fungi associated with palms have been studied for over two centuries. However, taxonomic identification of some taxa, especially of the prominent genera &lt;i&gt;Anthostomella&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;Linocarpon&lt;/i&gt; and &lt;i&gt;Oxydothis&lt;/i&gt;, when based solely on macro- and micro-morphological characteristics is confused and needs better taxonomic resolution. The present study contributes to palm fungal taxonomy by incorporating molecular approaches for fungal identification based on new collections from China and Thailand. In total, 538 samples with 248 successfully obtained fungal isolates were derived from about 23 palm genera. Preliminary analyses showed that these taxa could be recognized as 170 species belonging to 115 genera, 66 families, and three genera &lt;i&gt;incertae sedis&lt;/i&gt;. The fungi were mainly distributed in Dothideomycetes (&lt;i&gt;c.&lt;/i&gt; 57.6%) and Sordariomycetes (&lt;i&gt;c.&lt;/i&gt; 40.6%), with a few Lecanoromycetes (0.6%), Leotiomycetes (0.6%), and Orbiliomycetes (0.6%). In the present study on palm hosts in different ecosystems, it becomes obvious that the biodiversity and specificity of palm fungi is a reflection of habitats more than the hosts or geographical distributions. Based on morpho-phylogenetic evidence, 109 interesting taxa have been illustrated and described, including one new family Pseudocapsulosporaceae, seven new genera and 48 new species. The new genera are &lt;i&gt;Javarisimilis&lt;/i&gt; and &lt;i&gt;Thecatisporium&lt;/i&gt; (Astrosphaeriellaceae), &lt;i&gt;Neomorosphaeria&lt;/i&gt; (Morosphaeriaceae), &lt;i&gt;Pseudocapsulospora&lt;/i&gt; (Pseudocapsulosporaceae), &lt;i&gt;Pseudoeutypa&lt;/i&gt; (Diatrypaceae), &lt;i&gt;Pseudothailandiomyces&lt;/i&gt; (Tirisporellaceae), and &lt;i&gt;Subanthostomella&lt;/i&gt; (Xylariales &lt;i&gt;incertae sedis&lt;/i&gt;). New species are &lt;i&gt;Anthostomella arecacearum&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;A. foliatella&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;A. mangrovei&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;A. pseudobirima&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;Brunneiapiospora phoenicis&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;Diaporthe trachycarpi&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;Dictyosporium licualae&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;Ernakulamia palmae&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;Exosporium licualae&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;Fasciatispora asexualis&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;Javarisimilis palmarum&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;Koorchaloma arecae&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;Lophodermium nypae&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;Morenoina rattanica&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;Nemania palmarum&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;Neobambusicola palmae&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;Neodeightonia nypae&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;Neoeriomycopsis sabal&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;Neoleptosporella palmae&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;Neomassaria livistonae&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;N. palmae&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;Neomorosphaeria mangrovei&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;Neosetophoma trachycarpi&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;Niesslia trachycarpi&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;Orbilia licualae&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;Oxydothis caryotae&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;Ox. foliata&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;Ox. palmae&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;Ox. pyriforme, Ox. sinensis&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;Parateichospora palmarum&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;Periconia arecacearum&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;Phaeosphaeria palmae&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;Phyllosticta arecacearum&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;P. foliacea&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;Protocreopsis palmarum&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;Pseudocapsulospora phoenicis&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;Ps. rhapidis&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;Pseudomicrothyrium palmae&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;Pseudothailandiomyces nypae&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;Serenomyces phoeniceus&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;Stanjehughesia elaeidis&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;Subanthostomella palma","PeriodicalId":12471,"journal":{"name":"Fungal Diversity","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":20.3,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141618240","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A re-evaluation of Diaporthe: refining the boundaries of species and species complexes 重新评价 Diaporthe:完善物种和物种复合体的界限
IF 20.3 1区 生物学 Q1 MYCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-07-09 DOI: 10.1007/s13225-024-00538-7
Asha J. Dissanayake, Jin-Tao Zhu, Ya-Ya Chen, Sajeewa S. N. Maharachchikumbura, Kevin D. Hyde, Jian-Kui Liu

Diaporthe is an important plant pathogenic genus, which also occurs as endophytes and saprobes. Many Diaporthe species that are morphologically similar proved to be genetically distinct. The current understanding of Diaporthe taxonomy by applying morphological characters, host associations and multi-gene phylogeny are problematic leading to overestimation/underestimation of species numbers of this significant fungal pathogenic genus. Currently, there are no definite boundaries for the accepted species. Hence, the present study aims to re-structure the genus Diaporthe, based on single gene phylogenies (ITS, tef, tub, cal and his), multi-gene phylogeny justified by applying GCPSR (Genealogical Concordance Phylogenetic Species Recognition) methodology as well as the coalescence-based models (PTP—Poisson Tree Processes and mPTP—multi-rate Poisson Tree Processes). Considering all available type isolates of Diaporthe, the genus is divided into seven sections while boundaries for 13 species and 15 species-complexes are proposed. To support this re-assessment of the genus, 82 Diaporthe isolates obtained from woody hosts in Guizhou Province in China were investigated and revealed the presence of two novel species and 17 previously known species. Synonymies are specified for 31 species based on molecular data and morphological studies. Dividing Diaporthe into several specific sections based on phylogenetic analyses can avoid the construction of lengthy phylogenetic trees of the entire genus in future taxonomic studies. In other words, when one conducts research related to the genus, only species from the appropriate section need to be selected for phylogenetic analysis.

Diaporthe 是一种重要的植物病原菌属,也以内生菌和病原菌的形式存在。事实证明,许多形态上相似的 Diaporthe 物种在基因上是不同的。目前通过形态特征、寄主关系和多基因系统发育对 Diaporthe 分类的理解存在问题,导致对这一重要真菌病原菌属的物种数量估计过高或过低。目前,公认的种没有明确的界限。因此,本研究旨在根据单基因系统发育(ITS、tef、tub、cal 和 his)、应用 GCPSR(谱系一致系统发育物种识别)方法证明的多基因系统发育以及基于凝聚的模型(PTP-泊松树过程和 mPTP-多速率泊松树过程),重新构建 Diaporthe 属。考虑到 Diaporthe 的所有可用模式分离物,该属被划分为 7 个部分,同时提出了 13 个种和 15 个种-复合体的边界。为了支持对该属的重新评估,对从中国贵州省木质寄主中获得的 82 个 Diaporthe 分离物进行了调查,发现了 2 个新种和 17 个以前已知的种。根据分子数据和形态学研究,为 31 个种确定了同名。根据系统发育分析将 Diaporthe 分成几个特定的部分,可以避免在未来的分类研究中构建冗长的全属系统发育树。换句话说,在进行与该属相关的研究时,只需选择相应部分的物种进行系统发育分析。
{"title":"A re-evaluation of Diaporthe: refining the boundaries of species and species complexes","authors":"Asha J. Dissanayake, Jin-Tao Zhu, Ya-Ya Chen, Sajeewa S. N. Maharachchikumbura, Kevin D. Hyde, Jian-Kui Liu","doi":"10.1007/s13225-024-00538-7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-024-00538-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><i>Diaporthe</i> is an important plant pathogenic genus, which also occurs as endophytes and saprobes. Many <i>Diaporthe</i> species that are morphologically similar proved to be genetically distinct. The current understanding of <i>Diaporthe</i> taxonomy by applying morphological characters, host associations and multi-gene phylogeny are problematic leading to overestimation/underestimation of species numbers of this significant fungal pathogenic genus. Currently, there are no definite boundaries for the accepted species. Hence, the present study aims to re-structure the genus <i>Diaporthe</i>, based on single gene phylogenies (ITS, <i>tef</i>, <i>tub</i>, <i>cal</i> and <i>his</i>), multi-gene phylogeny justified by applying GCPSR (Genealogical Concordance Phylogenetic Species Recognition) methodology as well as the coalescence-based models (PTP—Poisson Tree Processes and mPTP—multi-rate Poisson Tree Processes). Considering all available type isolates of <i>Diaporthe</i>, the genus is divided into seven sections while boundaries for 13 species and 15 species-complexes are proposed. To support this re-assessment of the genus, 82 <i>Diaporthe</i> isolates obtained from woody hosts in Guizhou Province in China were investigated and revealed the presence of two novel species and 17 previously known species. Synonymies are specified for 31 species based on molecular data and morphological studies. Dividing <i>Diaporthe</i> into several specific sections based on phylogenetic analyses can avoid the construction of lengthy phylogenetic trees of the entire genus in future taxonomic studies. In other words, when one conducts research related to the genus, only species from the appropriate section need to be selected for phylogenetic analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":12471,"journal":{"name":"Fungal Diversity","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":20.3,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141561350","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Fungal Diversity
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1