Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-11-07DOI: 10.1111/head.15097
Bradley Ong, Victor Lomachinsky-Torres, Nymisha Mandava, Harpreet Kaur, Roman Popov, Payal Patel Soni
Background: Despite optimized therapy, up to 30% of patients with trigeminal neuralgia (TN) experience treatment failure. To date, there is limited and low-quality data available on rescue strategies for this subset of patients. This study describes clinical outcomes associated with intravenous (IV) magnesium sulfate and methocarbamol, with or without adjunctive antiseizure medications (ASMs), in the management of acute, refractory TN pain crises.
Methods: This was a single-center, retrospective cohort study conducted at the Cleveland Clinic Headache and Facial Pain Section from January 2015 to 2024. We analyzed adults (≥18 years) with treatment-refractory TN who received a standardized 3-day infusion regimen of magnesium sulfate and methocarbamol, with or without IV ASMs (levetiracetam, lacosamide, or valproic acid). Each encounter represented a distinct TN pain crisis treated with 3 consecutive days of infusion therapy. Infusions were administered specifically during acute exacerbations of pain that occurred despite ongoing or previously attempted maintenance treatment. Pain intensity was assessed using the 11-point numerical rating scale before and after each infusion day. The primary outcome was the proportion of encounters achieving a ≥50% reduction in NRS score from day 1 preinfusion to day 3 postinfusion.
Results: A total of 170 patients were included. The patient encounters analyzed in this study had an overall mean age of 57.0 years and consisted mostly of females (n = 130, 76.5%). A ≥50% reduction in pain score was achieved in 86.9% of encounters. The largest reduction occurred on day 1, with diminishing but continued improvements on days 2 and 3. Adjunctive IV ASMs were not associated with improved response compared to the magnesium and methocarbamol alone (72.4% vs. 75.8%, respectively; p = 0.740). Pain Disability Index scores also improved among patients with follow-up data.
Conclusion: A 3-day IV infusion protocol combining magnesium sulfate and methocarbamol, with or without adjunctive ASMs, was associated with rapid, meaningful pain relief in most patients with acute TN pain crises. Larger, prospective studies are warranted to further investigate and confirm the effectiveness of this IV treatment strategy for managing this challenging neurological condition.
{"title":"Intravenous magnesium and methocarbamol for acute pain crises in refractory trigeminal neuralgia: A retrospective analysis.","authors":"Bradley Ong, Victor Lomachinsky-Torres, Nymisha Mandava, Harpreet Kaur, Roman Popov, Payal Patel Soni","doi":"10.1111/head.15097","DOIUrl":"10.1111/head.15097","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite optimized therapy, up to 30% of patients with trigeminal neuralgia (TN) experience treatment failure. To date, there is limited and low-quality data available on rescue strategies for this subset of patients. This study describes clinical outcomes associated with intravenous (IV) magnesium sulfate and methocarbamol, with or without adjunctive antiseizure medications (ASMs), in the management of acute, refractory TN pain crises.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single-center, retrospective cohort study conducted at the Cleveland Clinic Headache and Facial Pain Section from January 2015 to 2024. We analyzed adults (≥18 years) with treatment-refractory TN who received a standardized 3-day infusion regimen of magnesium sulfate and methocarbamol, with or without IV ASMs (levetiracetam, lacosamide, or valproic acid). Each encounter represented a distinct TN pain crisis treated with 3 consecutive days of infusion therapy. Infusions were administered specifically during acute exacerbations of pain that occurred despite ongoing or previously attempted maintenance treatment. Pain intensity was assessed using the 11-point numerical rating scale before and after each infusion day. The primary outcome was the proportion of encounters achieving a ≥50% reduction in NRS score from day 1 preinfusion to day 3 postinfusion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 170 patients were included. The patient encounters analyzed in this study had an overall mean age of 57.0 years and consisted mostly of females (n = 130, 76.5%). A ≥50% reduction in pain score was achieved in 86.9% of encounters. The largest reduction occurred on day 1, with diminishing but continued improvements on days 2 and 3. Adjunctive IV ASMs were not associated with improved response compared to the magnesium and methocarbamol alone (72.4% vs. 75.8%, respectively; p = 0.740). Pain Disability Index scores also improved among patients with follow-up data.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A 3-day IV infusion protocol combining magnesium sulfate and methocarbamol, with or without adjunctive ASMs, was associated with rapid, meaningful pain relief in most patients with acute TN pain crises. Larger, prospective studies are warranted to further investigate and confirm the effectiveness of this IV treatment strategy for managing this challenging neurological condition.</p>","PeriodicalId":12844,"journal":{"name":"Headache","volume":" ","pages":"183-192"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12849536/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145458365","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-11-14DOI: 10.1111/head.15087
Lauren Shin, Olivia Mentz, Amy A Gelfand, Blanca Marquez de Prado, Hannah Shapiro, Ann Oh, Ogo-Oluwa Onifade, Jessica Saunders, Nichelle Raj, Christina L Szperka
<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>There is an unmet need for safe, evidence-based pharmacologic treatments for migraine prevention in children and adolescents. Rimegepant and atogepant, calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonists (gepants), have been shown to be efficacious and well-tolerated preventive treatments in adults with migraine. While we await the results of randomized trials in children and adolescents, this study aimed to provide real-world evidence on the safety and effectiveness of rimegepant and atogepant as preventive headache treatments for youth.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a multisite retrospective chart review study. Sites included Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Cincinnati Children's Hospital, and University of California San Francisco Benioff Children's Hospital. Inclusion criteria were patients under 18 years of age who were prescribed rimegepant and/or atogepant for preventive treatment. At University of California San Francisco Benioff Children's Hospital and Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, charts of all patients prescribed atogepant, as well as those prescribed rimegepant without a specified "as needed" indication, were reviewed. Data collection at Cincinnati Children's Hospital was a convenience sample based on providers' knowledge. Clinical and demographic data both before and after gepant treatment were abstracted into Research Electronic Data Capture. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize clinical observations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 71 patients who met inclusion criteria, 26 used atogepant and 55 used rimegepant- including 10 who used both. The majority were adolescent females. Migraine was the most common diagnosis. Median number of previous preventive trials was six (interquartile range: 4-8) in the rimegepant group and seven (interquartile range: 5-8) in the atogepant group. Fifty-eight percent (32/55) of the rimegepant group and 43% (11/26) of the atogepant group saw at least some benefit. Four of 55 patients reported side effects with rimegepant-constipation, nausea, abdominal pain, fatigue, and transient worsening of headache (n = 1 for each; one patient reported abdominal pain and fatigue). Seven of 26 patients reported side effects with atogepant-nausea (2/26), fatigue (2/26), constipation (1/26), depressed mood (1/26), and feeling cold (1/26). No serious side effects were reported. An exploratory analysis for factors associated with response suggests that a longer headache history has a higher likelihood of benefit (odds ratio 1.41, 95% confidence interval: 1.07-1.85, p = 0.014), and in contrast, more severe limitations in functionality has lower likelihood of benefit (odds ratio 0.18, 95% confidence interval: 0.05-0.58, p = 0.004).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this real-world evidence study, gepants for headache prevention in youth were generally well tolerated. Despite failure of multiple prior therapies, some patients benefited from these trea
{"title":"Gepants for headache prevention in children and adolescents: A multicenter chart review study.","authors":"Lauren Shin, Olivia Mentz, Amy A Gelfand, Blanca Marquez de Prado, Hannah Shapiro, Ann Oh, Ogo-Oluwa Onifade, Jessica Saunders, Nichelle Raj, Christina L Szperka","doi":"10.1111/head.15087","DOIUrl":"10.1111/head.15087","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>There is an unmet need for safe, evidence-based pharmacologic treatments for migraine prevention in children and adolescents. Rimegepant and atogepant, calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonists (gepants), have been shown to be efficacious and well-tolerated preventive treatments in adults with migraine. While we await the results of randomized trials in children and adolescents, this study aimed to provide real-world evidence on the safety and effectiveness of rimegepant and atogepant as preventive headache treatments for youth.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a multisite retrospective chart review study. Sites included Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Cincinnati Children's Hospital, and University of California San Francisco Benioff Children's Hospital. Inclusion criteria were patients under 18 years of age who were prescribed rimegepant and/or atogepant for preventive treatment. At University of California San Francisco Benioff Children's Hospital and Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, charts of all patients prescribed atogepant, as well as those prescribed rimegepant without a specified \"as needed\" indication, were reviewed. Data collection at Cincinnati Children's Hospital was a convenience sample based on providers' knowledge. Clinical and demographic data both before and after gepant treatment were abstracted into Research Electronic Data Capture. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize clinical observations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 71 patients who met inclusion criteria, 26 used atogepant and 55 used rimegepant- including 10 who used both. The majority were adolescent females. Migraine was the most common diagnosis. Median number of previous preventive trials was six (interquartile range: 4-8) in the rimegepant group and seven (interquartile range: 5-8) in the atogepant group. Fifty-eight percent (32/55) of the rimegepant group and 43% (11/26) of the atogepant group saw at least some benefit. Four of 55 patients reported side effects with rimegepant-constipation, nausea, abdominal pain, fatigue, and transient worsening of headache (n = 1 for each; one patient reported abdominal pain and fatigue). Seven of 26 patients reported side effects with atogepant-nausea (2/26), fatigue (2/26), constipation (1/26), depressed mood (1/26), and feeling cold (1/26). No serious side effects were reported. An exploratory analysis for factors associated with response suggests that a longer headache history has a higher likelihood of benefit (odds ratio 1.41, 95% confidence interval: 1.07-1.85, p = 0.014), and in contrast, more severe limitations in functionality has lower likelihood of benefit (odds ratio 0.18, 95% confidence interval: 0.05-0.58, p = 0.004).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this real-world evidence study, gepants for headache prevention in youth were generally well tolerated. Despite failure of multiple prior therapies, some patients benefited from these trea","PeriodicalId":12844,"journal":{"name":"Headache","volume":" ","pages":"239-248"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12849531/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145512726","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-09-23DOI: 10.1111/head.15057
Charlotte Zander, Christian Fung, Amir El Rahal, Florian Volz, Katharina Wolf, Alexander Rau, Hansjörg Mast, Jürgen Beck, Horst Urbach, Niklas Lützen
Objective: This study evaluated cranial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) signs in patients with post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) using an established assessment score developed for spontaneous intracranial hypotension (Bern score). We hypothesize that patients with chronic PDPH do not have typical imaging features of intracranial hypotension.
Background: PDPH is a well-known complication following an intentional or unintentional lumbar dural puncture with positional headache, neck stiffness, and hearing disturbances usually resolving within 14 days. However, the chronic course of PDPH is poorly represented in the third version of the International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD-3). Moreover, data on the role of cranial MRI in this cohort are lacking, but could facilitate care and management of chronic PDPH.
Methods: In this post hoc retrospective case series based on a chart review, we identified 86 consecutive patients from a tertiary medical care center in Freiburg, Germany between 01/2018 and 10/2024 with chronic PDPH, defined as persisting symptoms for >14 days post puncture and/or persisting after one or more epidural blood patches (EBP). Inclusion criteria were history of lumbar puncture (LP) or unintended dural puncture (UDP) and contrast enhanced cranial MRI for assessment of Bern score in all patients. Presence of epidural lumbar fluid was evaluated using heavily T2-weighted MRI or computed tomography (CT) myelography, whenever available (83/86 patients). Data were reviewed independently and blinded by two radiologists.
Results: Eighty-six patients with chronic PDPH (66 females; mean age of 38.8 ± 11.2 SD years) were included with LP as primary cause in 72% (n=62) and UDP while peridural (synonymous epidural) anesthesia (PDA) in 28% (n = 24). Median symptom duration was 220.0 (interquartile range [IQR] 94.0-474.0) days. Overall median Bern score was 2.0 (IQR 1.0-3.0) with no significant differences between LP versus PDA (p = 0.379). Local epidural fluid was present in 9/83 (11%) cases with adequate imaging and accompanied by higher median Bern scores (5.0 vs. 2.0; p = 0.026). Prior EBP was linked to lower median Bern scores (1.0 vs. 3.5; p < 0.001).
Conclusion: Patients with chronic PDPH predominantly present a low Bern score and rarely exhibit spinal epidural fluid. If present, spinal epidural fluid is accompanied by higher Bern score. Our findings highlight the unreliability of current MRI diagnostics to detect patients with chronic PDPH, which must not lead to a mitigation of the diagnosis or a refusal of treatment. Further research on MRI markers is needed here.
目的:本研究使用自发性颅内低血压评分(Bern评分)评估硬脑膜穿刺后头痛(PDPH)患者的颅磁共振成像(MRI)征象。我们假设慢性PDPH患者没有颅内低血压的典型影像学特征。背景:PDPH是一种众所周知的并发症,发生在有意或无意的腰硬膜穿刺后,伴有体位性头痛、颈部僵硬和听力障碍,通常在14天内消退。然而,在第三版国际头痛疾病分类(ICHD-3)中,PDPH的慢性病程表现不佳。此外,颅MRI在该队列中的作用数据缺乏,但可以促进慢性PDPH的护理和管理。方法:在这个基于图表回顾的回顾性病例系列中,我们从2018年1月1日至2024年10月期间,从德国弗莱堡的一家三级医疗中心连续筛选出86例慢性PDPH患者,定义为穿刺后症状持续10 ~ 14天和/或在一次或多次硬膜外补血(EBP)后症状持续。纳入标准为腰椎穿刺(LP)或意外硬脑膜穿刺(UDP)史,以及用于评估所有患者Bern评分的增强颅脑MRI。硬膜外腰椎积液的存在通过高t2加权MRI或CT脊髓造影进行评估(83/86例患者)。数据由两名放射科医生独立审查和盲法分析。结果:86例慢性PDPH患者(女性66例,平均年龄38.8±11.2 SD岁)以LP为主要原因的占72% (n=62),硬膜外麻醉(PDA)下的UDP占28% (n= 24)。中位症状持续时间为220.0天(四分位数间距[IQR] 94.0-474.0)。总体中位Bern评分为2.0 (IQR 1.0-3.0), LP与PDA之间无显著差异(p = 0.379)。9/83(11%)影像学检查正常且Bern评分中位数较高的病例存在局部硬膜外积液(5.0 vs. 2.0; p = 0.026)。既往EBP与较低的中位Bern评分相关(1.0 vs 3.5; p)结论:慢性PDPH患者主要表现为低Bern评分,很少出现脊髓硬膜外积液。如果存在脊髓硬膜外积液,则伴有较高的Bern评分。我们的研究结果强调了目前MRI诊断检测慢性PDPH患者的不可靠性,这绝不能导致减轻诊断或拒绝治疗。需要对MRI标记物进行进一步的研究。
{"title":"Patients with chronic post-dural puncture headache do not have typical imaging features of intracranial hypotension: An MRI study using the Bern score.","authors":"Charlotte Zander, Christian Fung, Amir El Rahal, Florian Volz, Katharina Wolf, Alexander Rau, Hansjörg Mast, Jürgen Beck, Horst Urbach, Niklas Lützen","doi":"10.1111/head.15057","DOIUrl":"10.1111/head.15057","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study evaluated cranial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) signs in patients with post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) using an established assessment score developed for spontaneous intracranial hypotension (Bern score). We hypothesize that patients with chronic PDPH do not have typical imaging features of intracranial hypotension.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>PDPH is a well-known complication following an intentional or unintentional lumbar dural puncture with positional headache, neck stiffness, and hearing disturbances usually resolving within 14 days. However, the chronic course of PDPH is poorly represented in the third version of the International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD-3). Moreover, data on the role of cranial MRI in this cohort are lacking, but could facilitate care and management of chronic PDPH.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this post hoc retrospective case series based on a chart review, we identified 86 consecutive patients from a tertiary medical care center in Freiburg, Germany between 01/2018 and 10/2024 with chronic PDPH, defined as persisting symptoms for >14 days post puncture and/or persisting after one or more epidural blood patches (EBP). Inclusion criteria were history of lumbar puncture (LP) or unintended dural puncture (UDP) and contrast enhanced cranial MRI for assessment of Bern score in all patients. Presence of epidural lumbar fluid was evaluated using heavily T2-weighted MRI or computed tomography (CT) myelography, whenever available (83/86 patients). Data were reviewed independently and blinded by two radiologists.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-six patients with chronic PDPH (66 females; mean age of 38.8 ± 11.2 SD years) were included with LP as primary cause in 72% (n=62) and UDP while peridural (synonymous epidural) anesthesia (PDA) in 28% (n = 24). Median symptom duration was 220.0 (interquartile range [IQR] 94.0-474.0) days. Overall median Bern score was 2.0 (IQR 1.0-3.0) with no significant differences between LP versus PDA (p = 0.379). Local epidural fluid was present in 9/83 (11%) cases with adequate imaging and accompanied by higher median Bern scores (5.0 vs. 2.0; p = 0.026). Prior EBP was linked to lower median Bern scores (1.0 vs. 3.5; p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with chronic PDPH predominantly present a low Bern score and rarely exhibit spinal epidural fluid. If present, spinal epidural fluid is accompanied by higher Bern score. Our findings highlight the unreliability of current MRI diagnostics to detect patients with chronic PDPH, which must not lead to a mitigation of the diagnosis or a refusal of treatment. Further research on MRI markers is needed here.</p>","PeriodicalId":12844,"journal":{"name":"Headache","volume":" ","pages":"193-201"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12849523/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145130641","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-09-22DOI: 10.1111/head.15063
Nav La, Schawanya K Rattanapitoon, Nathkapach K Rattanapitoon
{"title":"Cardiovascular risk considerations in triptan therapy for migraine: Reflections on the study by Peles et al.","authors":"Nav La, Schawanya K Rattanapitoon, Nathkapach K Rattanapitoon","doi":"10.1111/head.15063","DOIUrl":"10.1111/head.15063","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12844,"journal":{"name":"Headache","volume":" ","pages":"27-28"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145124456","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-12-01DOI: 10.1111/head.70016
Jennifer Robblee, Mia T Minen, Benjamin W Friedman, Miguel A Cortel-LeBlanc, Achelle Cortel-LeBlanc, Serena L Orr
<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To update the 2016 American Headache Society (AHS) guideline on parenteral pharmacologic therapies for the management of migraine attacks in the emergency department (ED).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis using the same methodology as the 2016 guideline. The original search strategy was repeated and expanded to include studies of nerve blocks and sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) blocks. We searched Medline, Embase, Cochrane, clinicaltrials.gov, and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform through February 10, 2025. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving adults diagnosed with migraine, treated in the ED with intravenous (IV), intramuscular (IM), subcutaneous (SC), or nerve block (including SPG block) interventions. Two reviewers independently screened titles/abstracts and full texts; a third reviewer resolved disagreements. Data were extracted using a standardized form and verified by a second reviewer. Risk of bias was assessed using the American Academy of Neurology (AAN) criteria. Where applicable, meta-analyses were performed. Efficacy was categorized as highly likely, likely, or possibly effective or ineffective. Clinical recommendations were developed using the AAN guideline development process.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search identified 26 new RCTs evaluating 20 injectable treatments. Of these, 12 were rated class I (low risk of bias), 9 class II, and 4 class III. Prochlorperazine IV, dexketoprofen IV, sumatriptan SC, and greater occipital nerve blocks (GONB) were considered highly likely to be effective based on multiple class I studies. Chlorpromazine IV, metoclopramide IV, eptinezumab IV, ketorolac IV, and supraorbital nerve blocks (SONB) were considered likely effective based on one class I or multiple class II studies. Hydromorphone IV, propofol IV, and paracetamol IV were considered likely ineffective based on class I or multiple class II studies. After review of the evidence and a consensus process, recommendations were made for each intervention.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Prochlorperazine IV and GONB must be offered to eligible adults presenting to the ED with a migraine attack for treatment of headache requiring parenteral therapy (level A - must offer) in those without contraindications, while hydromorphone IV must not be offered (level A - must not offer). Treatments that should be offered when appropriate (level B - should offer) include dexketoprofen IV, ketorolac IV, metoclopramide IV, sumatriptan SC, and SONB. Chlorpromazine IV, dexamethasone IV, and valproate IV may be offered (level C - may offer). Paracetamol IV may not be offered (level C - should not offer). Eptinezumab should be offered (level B) only for patients matching the clinical trial population but is rated level U - no recommendation for an ED-specific population. Additional evidence is needed
目的:更新2016年美国头痛学会(AHS)关于急诊科(ED)偏头痛发作管理的肠外药物治疗指南。方法:我们采用与2016年指南相同的方法进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析。最初的搜索策略被重复并扩展到包括神经阻滞和蝶腭神经节(SPG)阻滞的研究。我们检索了截至2025年2月10日的Medline、Embase、Cochrane、clinicaltrials.gov和世界卫生组织(WHO)国际临床试验注册平台。符合条件的研究是随机对照试验(RCTs),涉及诊断为偏头痛的成年人,在ED中接受静脉注射(IV)、肌肉注射(IM)、皮下注射(SC)或神经阻滞(包括SPG阻滞)干预。两位审稿人独立筛选标题/摘要和全文;第三位审稿人解决了分歧。使用标准化表格提取数据,并由第二审稿人进行验证。偏倚风险采用美国神经病学学会(AAN)标准进行评估。在适用的情况下,进行了荟萃分析。功效分为极可能、可能、可能有效或无效。临床建议是根据AAN指南制定过程制定的。结果:搜索确定了26个新的随机对照试验,评估了20种注射治疗方法。其中,12个被评为I类(低偏倚风险),9个被评为II类,4个被评为III类。基于多项I类研究,丙氯哌嗪IV、右酮洛芬IV、舒马匹坦SC和更大枕骨神经阻滞(GONB)被认为很可能有效。氯丙嗪IV、甲氧氯普胺IV、依替单抗IV、酮罗拉酸IV和眶上神经阻滞(SONB)在一项I类或多项II类研究中被认为可能有效。基于I类或多个II类研究,氢吗啡酮IV、异丙酚IV和扑热息痛IV被认为可能无效。在对证据进行审查并达成共识后,对每项干预措施提出建议。结论:在没有禁忌症的情况下,有偏头痛发作的成年人必须给予丙氯拉嗪IV和GONB治疗,以治疗需要肠外治疗的头痛(a级必须提供),而不能给予氢吗啡酮IV (a级必须提供)。适当时应给予的治疗(B级-应给予)包括dexketoprofen IV, ketorolac IV, metoclopramide IV,舒马匹坦SC和SONB。氯丙嗪IV,地塞米松IV,丙戊酸IV可提供(C级-可提供)。对乙酰氨基酚IV不能提供(C级-不应该提供)。Eptinezumab仅适用于符合临床试验人群的患者(B级),但额定值为U级-不推荐用于ed特异性人群。咖啡因、格拉司琼、布洛芬、氯胺酮、利多卡因、生理盐水、异丙酚和SPG阻滞剂目前都被评为U级——不推荐。
{"title":"2025 guideline update to acute treatment of migraine for adults in the emergency department: The American Headache Society evidence assessment of parenteral pharmacotherapies.","authors":"Jennifer Robblee, Mia T Minen, Benjamin W Friedman, Miguel A Cortel-LeBlanc, Achelle Cortel-LeBlanc, Serena L Orr","doi":"10.1111/head.70016","DOIUrl":"10.1111/head.70016","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To update the 2016 American Headache Society (AHS) guideline on parenteral pharmacologic therapies for the management of migraine attacks in the emergency department (ED).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis using the same methodology as the 2016 guideline. The original search strategy was repeated and expanded to include studies of nerve blocks and sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) blocks. We searched Medline, Embase, Cochrane, clinicaltrials.gov, and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform through February 10, 2025. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving adults diagnosed with migraine, treated in the ED with intravenous (IV), intramuscular (IM), subcutaneous (SC), or nerve block (including SPG block) interventions. Two reviewers independently screened titles/abstracts and full texts; a third reviewer resolved disagreements. Data were extracted using a standardized form and verified by a second reviewer. Risk of bias was assessed using the American Academy of Neurology (AAN) criteria. Where applicable, meta-analyses were performed. Efficacy was categorized as highly likely, likely, or possibly effective or ineffective. Clinical recommendations were developed using the AAN guideline development process.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search identified 26 new RCTs evaluating 20 injectable treatments. Of these, 12 were rated class I (low risk of bias), 9 class II, and 4 class III. Prochlorperazine IV, dexketoprofen IV, sumatriptan SC, and greater occipital nerve blocks (GONB) were considered highly likely to be effective based on multiple class I studies. Chlorpromazine IV, metoclopramide IV, eptinezumab IV, ketorolac IV, and supraorbital nerve blocks (SONB) were considered likely effective based on one class I or multiple class II studies. Hydromorphone IV, propofol IV, and paracetamol IV were considered likely ineffective based on class I or multiple class II studies. After review of the evidence and a consensus process, recommendations were made for each intervention.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Prochlorperazine IV and GONB must be offered to eligible adults presenting to the ED with a migraine attack for treatment of headache requiring parenteral therapy (level A - must offer) in those without contraindications, while hydromorphone IV must not be offered (level A - must not offer). Treatments that should be offered when appropriate (level B - should offer) include dexketoprofen IV, ketorolac IV, metoclopramide IV, sumatriptan SC, and SONB. Chlorpromazine IV, dexamethasone IV, and valproate IV may be offered (level C - may offer). Paracetamol IV may not be offered (level C - should not offer). Eptinezumab should be offered (level B) only for patients matching the clinical trial population but is rated level U - no recommendation for an ED-specific population. Additional evidence is needed","PeriodicalId":12844,"journal":{"name":"Headache","volume":" ","pages":"53-76"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145648363","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-11-25DOI: 10.1111/head.70002
Jad El Ahdab, Marina Vilardo, Bradley Ong, Nicolas R Thompson, Neil Nero, Ahmet Günkan, Neil Cherian, Julia Bucklan
Background: Vestibular migraine (VM) is a common migraine subtype characterized by recurrent vestibular symptoms. Despite its prevalence, evidence-based treatment guidelines are lacking. Vestibular rehabilitation (VR) has been proven effective in many vestibular disorders, but its role in managing VM has not been well established. This systematic review aimed to summarize and pool the evidence on the effectiveness of VR for VM using standardized outcome measures, primarily focusing on patient-reported dizziness-related quality-of-life assessments.
Methods: We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Scopus from inception to March 2025 for studies evaluating self-reported and physical outcome measures of VR in patients with VM. Meta-analysis of mean change in Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) scores was performed. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool for the randomized controlled trials and the ROBINS-I tool for observational studies.
Results: Seven studies comprising 413 patients (mean age, 45.4; 76% female) with VM treated with VR were included. The effect of vestibular rehabilitation on DHI scores showed a pooled mean difference of -29.3 (95% confidence interval [CI], -40.2 to -18.3), more than the clinically important difference of 18 points. Although, our meta-analysis had high heterogeneity (Cochran's Q p value <0.001, I2 = 94.7%).
Conclusion: VR demonstrated a reduction in DHI scores, meeting the clinically significant difference of 18 indicating clinical improvement. However, the considerable heterogeneity limits the generalizability of these results and highlights the need for further standardized randomized controlled trials with subgroup analyses to better determine the specific benefits and optimal protocols of VR in managing VM.
{"title":"The effect of vestibular rehabilitation in the management of vestibular migraine in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Jad El Ahdab, Marina Vilardo, Bradley Ong, Nicolas R Thompson, Neil Nero, Ahmet Günkan, Neil Cherian, Julia Bucklan","doi":"10.1111/head.70002","DOIUrl":"10.1111/head.70002","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Vestibular migraine (VM) is a common migraine subtype characterized by recurrent vestibular symptoms. Despite its prevalence, evidence-based treatment guidelines are lacking. Vestibular rehabilitation (VR) has been proven effective in many vestibular disorders, but its role in managing VM has not been well established. This systematic review aimed to summarize and pool the evidence on the effectiveness of VR for VM using standardized outcome measures, primarily focusing on patient-reported dizziness-related quality-of-life assessments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Scopus from inception to March 2025 for studies evaluating self-reported and physical outcome measures of VR in patients with VM. Meta-analysis of mean change in Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) scores was performed. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool for the randomized controlled trials and the ROBINS-I tool for observational studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven studies comprising 413 patients (mean age, 45.4; 76% female) with VM treated with VR were included. The effect of vestibular rehabilitation on DHI scores showed a pooled mean difference of -29.3 (95% confidence interval [CI], -40.2 to -18.3), more than the clinically important difference of 18 points. Although, our meta-analysis had high heterogeneity (Cochran's Q p value <0.001, I<sup>2</sup> = 94.7%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>VR demonstrated a reduction in DHI scores, meeting the clinically significant difference of 18 indicating clinical improvement. However, the considerable heterogeneity limits the generalizability of these results and highlights the need for further standardized randomized controlled trials with subgroup analyses to better determine the specific benefits and optimal protocols of VR in managing VM.</p>","PeriodicalId":12844,"journal":{"name":"Headache","volume":" ","pages":"77-87"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145603490","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-11-05DOI: 10.1111/head.15093
Rylan Heart Villaruz, Jonathan Kuziek, Kirsten Sjonnesen, Lindsay Craddock, Werner J Becker, Ashley D Harris, Serena L Orr
<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the relationship between migraine attack onset in children and adolescents and Chinooks, which are dry and warm westerly winds that generally occur in the winter and bring about abrupt weather changes to the east of the Rocky Mountains in Southern Alberta, Canada.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective longitudinal clinical cohort study with recruitment from November 2020 to May 2024. Participants were: 8-18 years old, had migraine as per International Classification of Headache Disorders 3rd edition criteria, had 1-15 headache days/month, lived in the geographical location where Chinook winds occur, and had exposure to at least one pre-Chinook or Chinook day during the study period. Chinook days were defined using Nkemdirim's criteria and Environment Canada data were used to categorize day type as either Chinook, pre-Chinook, or non-Chinook. Weather data were merged with data from daily headache diaries, completed for periods of 8-30 days. The primary outcome was attack onset, defined as a day with a new migraine attack of moderate or severe severity, as per the 4-point scale (0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe). Both univariate and adjusted models were used to determine if there was an association between migraine attack onset and day type (i.e., pre-Chinook, Chinook, or non-Chinook) at the aggregate study sample level. The adjusted models controlled for age and sex, and both models included a random intercept. Subsequently, individual n = 1 models were fitted to explore each individual participant's personal odds of migraine attack onset on both pre-Chinook and Chinook days versus non-Chinook days. Pre-Chinook/Chinook sensitivity values were calculated for each individual by dividing the model's regression coefficient by its standard error. Sensitivity values >1.96 suggest a significant association between pre-Chinook/Chinook days and attack onset.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty youth with 1253 days of complete data, of which 144 (12%) were attack onset days, participated in the study. There were 158 Chinook (13%), 124 pre-Chinook (10%), and 971 non-Chinook days (77%). There were 39 female participants (39 of 60; 65%), with a median age of 14 years (quartile [Q] 1 = 12, Q3 = 16), and a median headache frequency of 6.2 days/month (Q1 = 4, Q3 = 11). Neither the univariate nor the adjusted models found any significant association between day type and attack onset at an aggregate level (pre-Chinook adjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.98; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.54-1.78, p = 0.947; Chinook adjusted OR, 1.15; 95% CI, 0.69-1.91, p = 0.596). No individual participants met the threshold for statistically significant pre-Chinook or Chinook sensitivity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We did not find a relationship between pre-Chinook and Chinook conditions and migraine attack onset. This may be due to the lack of an association between Chinooks and attack onset in youth wi
{"title":"Chinook winds and migraine attack onset in children and adolescents: A prospective longitudinal clinical cohort study.","authors":"Rylan Heart Villaruz, Jonathan Kuziek, Kirsten Sjonnesen, Lindsay Craddock, Werner J Becker, Ashley D Harris, Serena L Orr","doi":"10.1111/head.15093","DOIUrl":"10.1111/head.15093","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the relationship between migraine attack onset in children and adolescents and Chinooks, which are dry and warm westerly winds that generally occur in the winter and bring about abrupt weather changes to the east of the Rocky Mountains in Southern Alberta, Canada.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective longitudinal clinical cohort study with recruitment from November 2020 to May 2024. Participants were: 8-18 years old, had migraine as per International Classification of Headache Disorders 3rd edition criteria, had 1-15 headache days/month, lived in the geographical location where Chinook winds occur, and had exposure to at least one pre-Chinook or Chinook day during the study period. Chinook days were defined using Nkemdirim's criteria and Environment Canada data were used to categorize day type as either Chinook, pre-Chinook, or non-Chinook. Weather data were merged with data from daily headache diaries, completed for periods of 8-30 days. The primary outcome was attack onset, defined as a day with a new migraine attack of moderate or severe severity, as per the 4-point scale (0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe). Both univariate and adjusted models were used to determine if there was an association between migraine attack onset and day type (i.e., pre-Chinook, Chinook, or non-Chinook) at the aggregate study sample level. The adjusted models controlled for age and sex, and both models included a random intercept. Subsequently, individual n = 1 models were fitted to explore each individual participant's personal odds of migraine attack onset on both pre-Chinook and Chinook days versus non-Chinook days. Pre-Chinook/Chinook sensitivity values were calculated for each individual by dividing the model's regression coefficient by its standard error. Sensitivity values >1.96 suggest a significant association between pre-Chinook/Chinook days and attack onset.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty youth with 1253 days of complete data, of which 144 (12%) were attack onset days, participated in the study. There were 158 Chinook (13%), 124 pre-Chinook (10%), and 971 non-Chinook days (77%). There were 39 female participants (39 of 60; 65%), with a median age of 14 years (quartile [Q] 1 = 12, Q3 = 16), and a median headache frequency of 6.2 days/month (Q1 = 4, Q3 = 11). Neither the univariate nor the adjusted models found any significant association between day type and attack onset at an aggregate level (pre-Chinook adjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.98; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.54-1.78, p = 0.947; Chinook adjusted OR, 1.15; 95% CI, 0.69-1.91, p = 0.596). No individual participants met the threshold for statistically significant pre-Chinook or Chinook sensitivity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We did not find a relationship between pre-Chinook and Chinook conditions and migraine attack onset. This may be due to the lack of an association between Chinooks and attack onset in youth wi","PeriodicalId":12844,"journal":{"name":"Headache","volume":" ","pages":"96-107"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12849522/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145444582","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-12-15DOI: 10.1111/head.70022
Nan Cheng, Risako Shirane, Patricia A Olson
{"title":"Rising together: Building the next generation of reviewers in headache medicine.","authors":"Nan Cheng, Risako Shirane, Patricia A Olson","doi":"10.1111/head.70022","DOIUrl":"10.1111/head.70022","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12844,"journal":{"name":"Headache","volume":" ","pages":"330-331"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145756238","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Derrek Schartz, Alan Finkelstein, Matthew T Bender
Objective: The aim of this study was to synthesize a unifying disease model for idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) based on the current literature.
Background: IIH is a complex neurological condition defined by abnormally elevated intracranial pressure in the absence of an identifiable etiology. Although various causal mechanisms are thought to contribute to the development of IIH pathophysiology, how they interrelate remains poorly understood.
Methods: Here, we synthesize emerging evidence indicating that cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and interstitial fluid (ISF) dyshomeostasis drive IIH pathology and how alterations in neurofluid regulation are associated with transverse sinus stenosis, brain volume, and the cerebral glymphatic system.
Results: We propose a unified disease model where obesity-mediated metabolic dysfunction results in impaired glymphatic clearance with consequential accumulation of brain ISF with resultant increased brain volume. This subsequently results in extramural compression of the dural venous sinuses. Dural venous stenosis causes venous hypertension with further veno-glymphatic congestion and a positive feedback loop on impaired glymphatic drainage, which further perpetuates interstitial fluid stasis and increased brain volume with increased intracranial pressure.
Conclusions: The presented unifying disease model integrates various observations and suspected drivers of the condition into a cohesive framework of IIH pathogenesis that may be used for future investigations and clinical conceptualization.
{"title":"A unifying disease model of idiopathic intracranial hypertension: A narrative review.","authors":"Derrek Schartz, Alan Finkelstein, Matthew T Bender","doi":"10.1111/head.70030","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/head.70030","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to synthesize a unifying disease model for idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) based on the current literature.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>IIH is a complex neurological condition defined by abnormally elevated intracranial pressure in the absence of an identifiable etiology. Although various causal mechanisms are thought to contribute to the development of IIH pathophysiology, how they interrelate remains poorly understood.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Here, we synthesize emerging evidence indicating that cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and interstitial fluid (ISF) dyshomeostasis drive IIH pathology and how alterations in neurofluid regulation are associated with transverse sinus stenosis, brain volume, and the cerebral glymphatic system.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We propose a unified disease model where obesity-mediated metabolic dysfunction results in impaired glymphatic clearance with consequential accumulation of brain ISF with resultant increased brain volume. This subsequently results in extramural compression of the dural venous sinuses. Dural venous stenosis causes venous hypertension with further veno-glymphatic congestion and a positive feedback loop on impaired glymphatic drainage, which further perpetuates interstitial fluid stasis and increased brain volume with increased intracranial pressure.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The presented unifying disease model integrates various observations and suspected drivers of the condition into a cohesive framework of IIH pathogenesis that may be used for future investigations and clinical conceptualization.</p>","PeriodicalId":12844,"journal":{"name":"Headache","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145862714","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Emmanuelle A D Schindler, Christopher H Gottschalk, Brian P Pittman, Deepak C D'Souza
<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The goals of this study were to examine the therapeutic effects and safety of psilocybin given as a pulsed regimen for the prevention of migraine and to consider the blinding integrity of an active control agent.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>The administration of a single low dose of psilocybin was observed to have lasting therapeutic effects in one small pilot trial in migraine, although the ability of a pulse dose regimen, as practiced by patients with cluster headache, to potentially improve magnitude and/or duration of transitional preventive effects has not been studied. Furthermore, comparison to an active placebo agent that adequately mimics the acute subjective effects of psilocybin is required to improve blinding integrity and measure placebo effects.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In an exploratory randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group study, adults with migraine having at least two weekly migraine days at baseline (n = 18) participated in two drug administration sessions separated by 7 days during which they received zero, one, or two doses of psilocybin (10 mg; psi). Whenever participants did not receive psilocybin, they received diphenhydramine (25 mg; diph). Participant recruitment took place between September 2021 and August 2023. The primary outcome measure was a change in migraine frequency using headache diary data collected starting 2 weeks before and continuing through 8 weeks after the second drug session.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the 2 weeks after completion of the two drug administration sessions, the change from baseline in migraine days/week was not significantly different among groups [diph-diph: -0.7 (95% confidence interval, -1.5 to 0.2); diph-psi: -2.0 (-3.0 to -1.0); psi-psi: -1.7 (-4.1 to 0.7); Χ<sup>2</sup> <sub>(2)</sub> = 4.56, p = 0.102], despite large effect sizes against the placebo group in the those receiving one (diph-psi; d = 1.66) or two (psi-psi; d = 0.69) doses of psilocybin. Similar reductions in migraine frequency approximating 50% were seen in all groups over the 8 weeks measured. The difference in 50% response rate among groups over 2 weeks, however, approached significance (diph-diph: 17%; diph-psi: 80%; psi-psi: 80%; p = 0.087). Drug confidence ratings (i.e., blinding integrity) suggested that diphenhydramine partially substituted for the acute effects of psilocybin. No correlations were observed between changes in migraine frequency after psilocybin and drug confidence, acute general drug effects, or acute psychedelic effects. No serious or unexpected adverse events occurred.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This exploratory study found similar reductions in migraine frequency with single-dose psilocybin, a two-dose pulse of psilocybin, or diphenhydramine placebo. Whereas blinding was incomplete in this study, this important topic is highlighted in the study design and findings. The potential for psilocybin to serve as a tra
目的:本研究的目的是检查裸盖菇素作为一种脉冲治疗方案用于预防偏头痛的治疗效果和安全性,并考虑一种活性对照剂的致盲完整性。背景:在一项针对偏头痛的小型试点试验中,单次低剂量裸盖菇素被观察到具有持久的治疗效果,尽管尚未研究集束性头痛患者采用脉冲剂量方案的能力,以潜在地改善过渡性预防效果的程度和/或持续时间。此外,需要与一种充分模仿裸盖菇素急性主观效应的活性安慰剂剂进行比较,以提高盲法的完整性并测量安慰剂效应。方法:在一项探索性随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、平行组研究中,在基线时每周至少有两天偏头痛的成年人(n = 18)参加了两个间隔7天的给药疗程,在此期间,他们接受0、1或2剂量的裸盖菇素(10mg; psi)。当参与者没有接受裸盖菇素时,他们接受苯海拉明(25mg; diph)。参与者招募在2021年9月至2023年8月期间进行。主要结果测量是偏头痛频率的变化,使用从第二次服药前2周开始到第二次服药后8周持续收集的头痛日记数据。结果:在两次给药疗程结束后的2周内,组间偏头痛天数/周的基线变化无显著差异[diph-diph: -0.7(95%可信区间,-1.5至0.2);Diph-psi: -2.0(-3.0至-1.0);Psi-psi: -1.7(-4.1至0.7);Χ2 (2) = 4.56, p = 0.102],尽管与安慰剂组相比,接受一剂(dip -psi; d = 1.66)或两剂(psi-psi; d = 0.69)裸盖菇素的组有很大的效应。在8周的测量中,所有组的偏头痛频率都减少了大约50%。2周后,两组间50%有效率的差异接近显著性(diph-diph: 17%; diph-psi: 80%; psi-psi: 80%; p = 0.087)。药物置信度评级(即盲性完整性)表明苯海拉明部分取代了裸盖菇素的急性作用。未观察到裸盖菇素后偏头痛频率的变化与药物信心、急性一般药物效应或急性迷幻效应之间的相关性。未发生严重或意外的不良事件。结论:这项探索性研究发现,单剂量裸盖菇素、双剂量裸盖菇素或苯海拉明安慰剂对偏头痛频率的降低相似。虽然本研究的盲法是不完整的,但这一重要主题在研究设计和研究结果中得到了强调。裸盖菇素作为偏头痛过渡性治疗的潜力仍然存在,但需要在未来的研究中仔细规划,以区分药物和非药物作用。此外,在这些未来研究的设计和执行中纳入头痛专家是必要的,以保持裸盖菇素在头痛药物治疗中的可行性。
{"title":"Comparing single- and repeat-dose psilocybin with active placebo for migraine prevention in an exploratory randomized controlled clinical trial.","authors":"Emmanuelle A D Schindler, Christopher H Gottschalk, Brian P Pittman, Deepak C D'Souza","doi":"10.1111/head.70024","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/head.70024","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The goals of this study were to examine the therapeutic effects and safety of psilocybin given as a pulsed regimen for the prevention of migraine and to consider the blinding integrity of an active control agent.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>The administration of a single low dose of psilocybin was observed to have lasting therapeutic effects in one small pilot trial in migraine, although the ability of a pulse dose regimen, as practiced by patients with cluster headache, to potentially improve magnitude and/or duration of transitional preventive effects has not been studied. Furthermore, comparison to an active placebo agent that adequately mimics the acute subjective effects of psilocybin is required to improve blinding integrity and measure placebo effects.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In an exploratory randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group study, adults with migraine having at least two weekly migraine days at baseline (n = 18) participated in two drug administration sessions separated by 7 days during which they received zero, one, or two doses of psilocybin (10 mg; psi). Whenever participants did not receive psilocybin, they received diphenhydramine (25 mg; diph). Participant recruitment took place between September 2021 and August 2023. The primary outcome measure was a change in migraine frequency using headache diary data collected starting 2 weeks before and continuing through 8 weeks after the second drug session.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the 2 weeks after completion of the two drug administration sessions, the change from baseline in migraine days/week was not significantly different among groups [diph-diph: -0.7 (95% confidence interval, -1.5 to 0.2); diph-psi: -2.0 (-3.0 to -1.0); psi-psi: -1.7 (-4.1 to 0.7); Χ<sup>2</sup> <sub>(2)</sub> = 4.56, p = 0.102], despite large effect sizes against the placebo group in the those receiving one (diph-psi; d = 1.66) or two (psi-psi; d = 0.69) doses of psilocybin. Similar reductions in migraine frequency approximating 50% were seen in all groups over the 8 weeks measured. The difference in 50% response rate among groups over 2 weeks, however, approached significance (diph-diph: 17%; diph-psi: 80%; psi-psi: 80%; p = 0.087). Drug confidence ratings (i.e., blinding integrity) suggested that diphenhydramine partially substituted for the acute effects of psilocybin. No correlations were observed between changes in migraine frequency after psilocybin and drug confidence, acute general drug effects, or acute psychedelic effects. No serious or unexpected adverse events occurred.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This exploratory study found similar reductions in migraine frequency with single-dose psilocybin, a two-dose pulse of psilocybin, or diphenhydramine placebo. Whereas blinding was incomplete in this study, this important topic is highlighted in the study design and findings. The potential for psilocybin to serve as a tra","PeriodicalId":12844,"journal":{"name":"Headache","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145849855","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}