{"title":"Is Groundwater Research Under Threat? A Look Into the Closure of the USEPA ORD","authors":"Sodiq Solagbade Oguntade","doi":"10.1111/gwat.70020","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/gwat.70020","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12866,"journal":{"name":"Groundwater","volume":"63 6","pages":"828-829"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145601125","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Trent J. Farnum, Andrew T. Leaf, Michael N. Fienen
PEST++IES (White 2018; White et al. 2020) is widely used in the groundwater modeling community for its ability to perform computationally efficient history matching and uncertainty analysis in a highly parameterized context. One primary advantage of using an iterative ensemble smoother is that the number of model runs required per iteration depends on the number of realizations in an ensemble, not the number of parameters in each realization. However, this raises the question: what is the optimal number of realizations and iterations to use for any one model before the point of diminishing returns? Using a modified version of the Freyberg model (Freyberg 1988; Hunt et al. 2020), different parameter and observation scenarios were evaluated for four iterations and ensembles of 10, 25, 50, 100, 250, 500, 1000, and 2000 realizations. To match observations, PEST++IES altered hydraulic conductivity (k), both globally across the model and locally at three different pilot point densities, as well as global recharge (via a single multiplier), global river conductance, and individual well flow rates. Risk-based well capture zone results (Fienen et al. 2022a) and estimated hydraulic conductivity fields from each scenario were quantitatively and qualitatively compared against the “truth” model and its outputs. Across the cases examined, ensemble sizes of 100 to 250 realizations and two PEST++IES iterations were generally sufficient to achieve good results.
PEST++IES (White 2018; White et al. 2020)在地下水建模界广泛使用,因为它能够在高度参数化的环境中执行计算效率高的历史匹配和不确定性分析。使用迭代集成平滑器的一个主要优点是,每次迭代所需的模型运行数量取决于集成中的实现数量,而不是每个实现中的参数数量。然而,这提出了一个问题:在收益递减点之前,任何一个模型使用的实现和迭代的最佳数量是多少?使用改进版的Freyberg模型(Freyberg 1988; Hunt et al. 2020),对4次迭代和10、25、50、100、250、500、1000和2000个实现的集合评估了不同的参数和观测情景。为了与观测结果相匹配,PEST++IES在三个不同的试验点密度下改变了整个模型和局部的水力导电性(k),以及全球回灌(通过单个倍增器)、全球河流导电性和单个井的流量。基于风险的井捕获区结果(Fienen et al. 2022a)和每种情况下的估计水力导率场与“真实”模型及其输出进行了定量和定性比较。在所检查的案例中,100到250个实现和两次PEST++IES迭代的集成规模通常足以获得良好的结果。
{"title":"PEST++IES How Many Iterations and Realizations, Finding the Point of Diminishing Returns","authors":"Trent J. Farnum, Andrew T. Leaf, Michael N. Fienen","doi":"10.1111/gwat.70018","DOIUrl":"10.1111/gwat.70018","url":null,"abstract":"<p>PEST++IES (White 2018; White et al. 2020) is widely used in the groundwater modeling community for its ability to perform computationally efficient history matching and uncertainty analysis in a highly parameterized context. One primary advantage of using an iterative ensemble smoother is that the number of model runs required per iteration depends on the number of realizations in an ensemble, not the number of parameters in each realization. However, this raises the question: what is the optimal number of realizations and iterations to use for any one model before the point of diminishing returns? Using a modified version of the Freyberg model (Freyberg 1988; Hunt et al. 2020), different parameter and observation scenarios were evaluated for four iterations and ensembles of 10, 25, 50, 100, 250, 500, 1000, and 2000 realizations. To match observations, PEST++IES altered hydraulic conductivity (<i>k</i>), both globally across the model and locally at three different pilot point densities, as well as global recharge (via a single multiplier), global river conductance, and individual well flow rates. Risk-based well capture zone results (Fienen et al. 2022a) and estimated hydraulic conductivity fields from each scenario were quantitatively and qualitatively compared against the “truth” model and its outputs. Across the cases examined, ensemble sizes of 100 to 250 realizations and two PEST++IES iterations were generally sufficient to achieve good results.</p>","PeriodicalId":12866,"journal":{"name":"Groundwater","volume":"63 6","pages":"926-933"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ngwa.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gwat.70018","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144994860","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Cross-sectional (2D) groundwater models are commonly applied to simulate complex processes that are challenging to capture using the coarse grids of 3D regional-scale models. 2D models are often extracted from 3D models for this purpose. However, translating groundwater properties from 3D to 2D models so that regional flow patterns are preserved poses several challenges. A methodology is presented here to maximize agreement between the heads of 2D and 3D groundwater models, considering MODFLOW models with rectilinear grids. This includes careful averaging of hydraulic properties and stresses from the 3D model to create commensurate properties and stresses in cross section. The approach was evaluated by examining the statistical match of transient heads within 10 cross sections extracted from a 3D model of the Limestone Coast (Australia). Concordance between 2D and 3D models was generally poor but was improved by incorporating lateral flow as inflows/outflows in 2D models. Lateral flows required inputs from the 3D model, which limits the application of 2D models as independent predictive tools. Pumping in the 3D model was redistributed to neighboring cells to reduce errors in the 2D model that arise from the limited capability to simulate pumping effects. Although pumping redistribution led to minimal improvement for the case study model, simpler modeling scenarios with more intense, localized pumping showed substantially better head matches between 2D and 3D models when pumping redistribution was applied. The methodology for creating cross-sectional models offered in this article provides relatively simple steps for creating 2D models that are consistent with 3D parent models, although further work is needed to develop a methodology for 2D models that are oblique to 3D model grids.
{"title":"Cross-Sectional Models of Groundwater Flow: Review and Correction for Transverse Flow","authors":"Amin Gholami, Amir Jazayeri, Adrian D. Werner","doi":"10.1111/gwat.70017","DOIUrl":"10.1111/gwat.70017","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Cross-sectional (2D) groundwater models are commonly applied to simulate complex processes that are challenging to capture using the coarse grids of 3D regional-scale models. 2D models are often extracted from 3D models for this purpose. However, translating groundwater properties from 3D to 2D models so that regional flow patterns are preserved poses several challenges. A methodology is presented here to maximize agreement between the heads of 2D and 3D groundwater models, considering MODFLOW models with rectilinear grids. This includes careful averaging of hydraulic properties and stresses from the 3D model to create commensurate properties and stresses in cross section. The approach was evaluated by examining the statistical match of transient heads within 10 cross sections extracted from a 3D model of the Limestone Coast (Australia). Concordance between 2D and 3D models was generally poor but was improved by incorporating lateral flow as inflows/outflows in 2D models. Lateral flows required inputs from the 3D model, which limits the application of 2D models as independent predictive tools. Pumping in the 3D model was redistributed to neighboring cells to reduce errors in the 2D model that arise from the limited capability to simulate pumping effects. Although pumping redistribution led to minimal improvement for the case study model, simpler modeling scenarios with more intense, localized pumping showed substantially better head matches between 2D and 3D models when pumping redistribution was applied. The methodology for creating cross-sectional models offered in this article provides relatively simple steps for creating 2D models that are consistent with 3D parent models, although further work is needed to develop a methodology for 2D models that are oblique to 3D model grids.</p>","PeriodicalId":12866,"journal":{"name":"Groundwater","volume":"63 5","pages":"752-763"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ngwa.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gwat.70017","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144994797","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Martijn D. van Leer, Willem J. Zaadnoordijk, Alraune Zech, Jasper Griffioen, Marc F. P. Bierkens
This study investigates the spatial and temporal sensitivity of aquitard hydraulic conductivity and specific storage on drawdowns in pumping tests. The objective is to understand which area of the aquitard is represented by drawdowns in different observation wells. A three-layered MODFLOW 6 model was used to simulate pumping tests on a circular Voronoi grid for three transmissivity scenarios and both confined and semiconfined top boundary conditions. A local sensitivity analysis was performed using PEST++ to determine how perturbations in hydraulic conductivity and specific storage of the aquitard affect head changes at observation wells in the pumped and overlying aquifer. Results indicate that for observation wells in the pumped aquifer, sensitivity forms an elliptical shape that is symmetrical around the observation well and the pumping well for all scenarios. The sensitivity map for the observation well in the overlying aquifer depends on the transmissivity ratio between both aquifers. It favors the area surrounding the pumping well if the transmissivity of the pumped aquifer is lower than that of the overlying aquifer. Conversely, with higher transmissivity in the pumped aquifer, sensitivity primarily lies around the observation well. Sensitivity patterns evolve over time, expanding the area of influence and shifting the sensitivity toward the observation well for a semiconfined top boundary. These findings are relevant for understanding the information regarding aquitard heterogeneity that is present in pumping test drawdowns and optimizing pumping test design.
{"title":"Mapping the Spatial Sensitivity of Aquitard Hydraulic Parameters on Pumping Test Drawdowns","authors":"Martijn D. van Leer, Willem J. Zaadnoordijk, Alraune Zech, Jasper Griffioen, Marc F. P. Bierkens","doi":"10.1111/gwat.70014","DOIUrl":"10.1111/gwat.70014","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study investigates the spatial and temporal sensitivity of aquitard hydraulic conductivity and specific storage on drawdowns in pumping tests. The objective is to understand which area of the aquitard is represented by drawdowns in different observation wells. A three-layered MODFLOW 6 model was used to simulate pumping tests on a circular Voronoi grid for three transmissivity scenarios and both confined and semiconfined top boundary conditions. A local sensitivity analysis was performed using PEST++ to determine how perturbations in hydraulic conductivity and specific storage of the aquitard affect head changes at observation wells in the pumped and overlying aquifer. Results indicate that for observation wells in the pumped aquifer, sensitivity forms an elliptical shape that is symmetrical around the observation well and the pumping well for all scenarios. The sensitivity map for the observation well in the overlying aquifer depends on the transmissivity ratio between both aquifers. It favors the area surrounding the pumping well if the transmissivity of the pumped aquifer is lower than that of the overlying aquifer. Conversely, with higher transmissivity in the pumped aquifer, sensitivity primarily lies around the observation well. Sensitivity patterns evolve over time, expanding the area of influence and shifting the sensitivity toward the observation well for a semiconfined top boundary. These findings are relevant for understanding the information regarding aquitard heterogeneity that is present in pumping test drawdowns and optimizing pumping test design.</p>","PeriodicalId":12866,"journal":{"name":"Groundwater","volume":"64 1","pages":"41-48"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12857531/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144983969","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Arsenic Contamination in Groundwater of the Bengal Basin: The Largest Mass Poisoning in Human History","authors":"Priyanka Sharma, Kaushik Mitra","doi":"10.1111/gwat.70015","DOIUrl":"10.1111/gwat.70015","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12866,"journal":{"name":"Groundwater","volume":"63 5","pages":"669-671"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145062853","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
<p>To most hydrogeologists, the term <i>groundwater potential</i> is synonymous with hydraulic head or fluid potential energy, as classically defined by Hubbert (<span>1940</span>) and discussed in numerous hydrogeology texts (e.g., Freeze and Cherry <span>1979</span>). It follows that a groundwater potential map is a map of an energy surface such as a potentiometric surface or water table. However, this term has recently taken on a new and confusing meaning for resource maps of uncertain and often dubious value.</p><p>Over the past few years <i>Groundwater</i> has received increasing numbers of manuscripts focused on either “groundwater potential” or “groundwater potential mapping”. Typically, such manuscripts use geographic information systems (GIS) or other overlay mapping approaches to generate qualitative maps of “groundwater potential” over areas of local to national scales. The manuscripts, and included maps, usually share a common problem—they fail to define “groundwater potential” or how their definition differs from the common quantitative hydrogeological definition. Almost universally the product of these studies is a subjective map, rating groundwater potential from “very low” to “very high” over a region of interest. The general meaning of potential in these studies seems to be “possible availability for some use” although that use is rarely identified. It is often unclear whether these maps refer to yield, storage, depth, water quality, ease of well construction, or some other property.</p><p>The usual methods of constructing these groundwater potential maps involve overlays of spatial data related to geology, slope, recharge, rainfall, land use, soil type, drainage density, lineaments, and topography. This information is often derived from publicly available remote sensing datasets or regional maps at relatively low cost, making the method particularly attractive in undeveloped areas where field data are likely scarce. Typically, the authors overlay and analyze these datasets using methods ranging from simply GIS stacking to sophisticated statistical models, machine learning algorithms, and hybrid/ensemble models (Thanh et al. <span>2022</span>). Often there is an attempt at validating the final map, but these validations usually suffer from over-correlation, faulty assumptions, and the absence of any error or uncertainty analyses of the multiple input datasets.</p><p>Two recent review papers discuss the methods and pitfalls of groundwater potential mapping. Díaz-Alcaide and Martínez-Santos (<span>2019</span>) reviewed over 200 papers and state that “…the search revealed neither a universal definition of groundwater potential, nor a standardized method or set of units to measure the outcomes.” They point out that quality assurance is a huge challenge in such studies and that “…only a minority of the groundwater potential maps found in the literature have been adequately checked against ground truth.” Thanh et al. (<span>2022</span>
对大多数水文地质学家来说,地下水潜力一词是水头或流体势能的同义词,这是Hubbert(1940)的经典定义,并在许多水文地质学著作(例如,Freeze和Cherry 1979)中进行了讨论。由此可见,地下水电位图是能量面(如电位面或地下水位)的图。然而,这个术语最近有了一个新的和令人困惑的含义,用于不确定和经常可疑的价值的资源图。在过去几年中,《地下水》收到了越来越多的关于“地下水潜力”或“地下水潜力测绘”的手稿。通常,这种手稿使用地理信息系统(GIS)或其他覆盖测绘方法来生成地方到国家范围内“地下水潜力”的定性地图。这些手稿,包括地图,通常都有一个共同的问题——它们没有定义“地下水潜力”,或者它们的定义与常见的定量水文地质学定义有何不同。几乎所有这些研究的结果都是一张主观地图,在一个感兴趣的地区将地下水潜力从“非常低”到“非常高”进行评级。在这些研究中,潜力的一般含义似乎是“某些用途的可能可用性”,尽管这种用途很少被确定。通常不清楚这些地图是指产量、储量、深度、水质、建井难易程度还是其他一些属性。构建这些地下水潜力图的常用方法涉及与地质、坡度、补给、降雨、土地利用、土壤类型、排水密度、轮廓和地形有关的空间数据的叠加。这些信息往往以相对较低的成本从公开的遥感数据集或区域地图中获得,这使得这种方法在可能缺乏实地数据的欠发达地区特别具有吸引力。通常,作者使用从简单的GIS堆叠到复杂的统计模型、机器学习算法和混合/集成模型等方法覆盖和分析这些数据集(Thanh et al. 2022)。通常会尝试验证最终的地图,但这些验证通常会受到过度相关、错误假设以及缺乏对多个输入数据集的任何错误或不确定性分析的影响。最近的两篇综述论文讨论了地下水潜力制图的方法和缺陷。Díaz-Alcaide和Martínez-Santos(2019)审查了200多篇论文,并指出“……研究既没有揭示地下水潜力的通用定义,也没有衡量结果的标准化方法或一套单位。”他们指出,在这类研究中,质量保证是一个巨大的挑战,而且“……在文献中发现的地下水潜力地图中,只有一小部分经过了与地面事实的充分核查。”Thanh等人(2022)记录了2010年至2020年间发表的1000多篇关于地下水潜力的文章,并指出“……地下水潜力的定义并不是一个在世界范围内统一使用的特定概念。使用地下水储量或产量来定义地下水潜力仍然存在争议,因为它们忽略了诸如地下水质量、含水层性质、敏感性、污染及其预期用途等因素。”我非常理解对地下水资源可用性信息的需求,特别是在欠发达、数据匮乏的地区,但我担心,我看到的地图即使不是完全错误,也经常提供误导性的结果。作为一名审阅这些手稿的编辑(通常会拒绝它们),我经常得到的印象是,作者是地理学家或空间科学家,对水文地质学的基本原理或估算补给或含水层性质的细微差别以及地下水流动方向、质量平衡和边界条件的含义知之甚少。我担心这些地图会被如何使用,以及它们会向它们的目标受众(假定是水资源管理者和决策者)传递什么信息。例如,一个外行人将如何解释“低”、“中等”和“高”地下水潜力之间的差异?鉴于水资源管理者需要了解他们的地下水资源,我主张绘制地图,清楚地定义它们所显示的内容。此类图的例子包括浅层含水层的潜在井产量、含水层厚度图或基本水质指标图(如总溶解固体、氯化物或硝酸盐)。这是水文地质学家所接受的训练。在我看来,这样的地图比模糊的地下水潜力地图更有用,技术上也更透明。最近,Groundwater发表了至少三篇关于地下水潜力测绘的论文(Algaydi et al. 2019; Phong et al. 2021; Muavhi and Mutoti 2023)。 在过去的两年里,我看到的关于这个主题的后续论文(大约20篇左右)并没有对地下水潜力这个模糊的术语提出新的见解,除非它们在这个主题上包含非常重要的新思想或新发现,否则我们将不再接受这些论文。
{"title":"Groundwater Potential Mapping: A Misused and Dubious Concept","authors":"Kenneth R. Bradbury","doi":"10.1111/gwat.70013","DOIUrl":"10.1111/gwat.70013","url":null,"abstract":"<p>To most hydrogeologists, the term <i>groundwater potential</i> is synonymous with hydraulic head or fluid potential energy, as classically defined by Hubbert (<span>1940</span>) and discussed in numerous hydrogeology texts (e.g., Freeze and Cherry <span>1979</span>). It follows that a groundwater potential map is a map of an energy surface such as a potentiometric surface or water table. However, this term has recently taken on a new and confusing meaning for resource maps of uncertain and often dubious value.</p><p>Over the past few years <i>Groundwater</i> has received increasing numbers of manuscripts focused on either “groundwater potential” or “groundwater potential mapping”. Typically, such manuscripts use geographic information systems (GIS) or other overlay mapping approaches to generate qualitative maps of “groundwater potential” over areas of local to national scales. The manuscripts, and included maps, usually share a common problem—they fail to define “groundwater potential” or how their definition differs from the common quantitative hydrogeological definition. Almost universally the product of these studies is a subjective map, rating groundwater potential from “very low” to “very high” over a region of interest. The general meaning of potential in these studies seems to be “possible availability for some use” although that use is rarely identified. It is often unclear whether these maps refer to yield, storage, depth, water quality, ease of well construction, or some other property.</p><p>The usual methods of constructing these groundwater potential maps involve overlays of spatial data related to geology, slope, recharge, rainfall, land use, soil type, drainage density, lineaments, and topography. This information is often derived from publicly available remote sensing datasets or regional maps at relatively low cost, making the method particularly attractive in undeveloped areas where field data are likely scarce. Typically, the authors overlay and analyze these datasets using methods ranging from simply GIS stacking to sophisticated statistical models, machine learning algorithms, and hybrid/ensemble models (Thanh et al. <span>2022</span>). Often there is an attempt at validating the final map, but these validations usually suffer from over-correlation, faulty assumptions, and the absence of any error or uncertainty analyses of the multiple input datasets.</p><p>Two recent review papers discuss the methods and pitfalls of groundwater potential mapping. Díaz-Alcaide and Martínez-Santos (<span>2019</span>) reviewed over 200 papers and state that “…the search revealed neither a universal definition of groundwater potential, nor a standardized method or set of units to measure the outcomes.” They point out that quality assurance is a huge challenge in such studies and that “…only a minority of the groundwater potential maps found in the literature have been adequately checked against ground truth.” Thanh et al. (<span>2022</span>","PeriodicalId":12866,"journal":{"name":"Groundwater","volume":"63 5","pages":"664-665"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ngwa.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gwat.70013","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144983938","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Cole Denver, Abraham E. Springer, Salli F. Dymond, Frances C. O'Donnell
Climate change induced aridity and Euro-American settlement have altered the historical disturbance and flow regimes of large portions of the ponderosa pine forests of northern Arizona. The increased occurrence of high-severity wildfires due to these changes has led to the establishment of various forest restoration programs to protect the region's forests and their watersheds. In 2014, a paired-watershed monitoring project was implemented to compare the impacts of differing levels of forest thinning to watershed hydrology in seven experimental watersheds nested within the Upper Lake Mary (ULM) watershed in Arizona. This study expands the calibration phase of the ULM paired-watershed by synthesizing historic precipitation, surface runoff, groundwater recharge, soil moisture data, and evapotranspiration (ET) data to perform regression analyses and create a holistic water balance for each watershed. The magnitude and timing of seasonal groundwater recharge events were quantified for the first time in this region using a water table fluctuation method. The results showed that recharge did not occur every year and was heavily dependent (P < 0.05) on total winter season precipitation and snowpack duration. On average, recharge composed 9% of the total water budget when present. The results of this study lay the foundation for a greater understanding of how forest restoration alters northern Arizona's forest hydrology and will provide crucial information that should be used in water policy and water resource decision-making as the region plans for future water availability.
{"title":"Groundwater Recharge in a Fire-Adapted, Semi-Arid Forest: A Watershed Water Balance Approach","authors":"Cole Denver, Abraham E. Springer, Salli F. Dymond, Frances C. O'Donnell","doi":"10.1111/gwat.70011","DOIUrl":"10.1111/gwat.70011","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Climate change induced aridity and Euro-American settlement have altered the historical disturbance and flow regimes of large portions of the ponderosa pine forests of northern Arizona. The increased occurrence of high-severity wildfires due to these changes has led to the establishment of various forest restoration programs to protect the region's forests and their watersheds. In 2014, a paired-watershed monitoring project was implemented to compare the impacts of differing levels of forest thinning to watershed hydrology in seven experimental watersheds nested within the Upper Lake Mary (ULM) watershed in Arizona. This study expands the calibration phase of the ULM paired-watershed by synthesizing historic precipitation, surface runoff, groundwater recharge, soil moisture data, and evapotranspiration (ET) data to perform regression analyses and create a holistic water balance for each watershed. The magnitude and timing of seasonal groundwater recharge events were quantified for the first time in this region using a water table fluctuation method. The results showed that recharge did not occur every year and was heavily dependent (<i>P</i> < 0.05) on total winter season precipitation and snowpack duration. On average, recharge composed 9% of the total water budget when present. The results of this study lay the foundation for a greater understanding of how forest restoration alters northern Arizona's forest hydrology and will provide crucial information that should be used in water policy and water resource decision-making as the region plans for future water availability.</p>","PeriodicalId":12866,"journal":{"name":"Groundwater","volume":"63 5","pages":"736-751"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ngwa.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gwat.70011","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144850092","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Gordon Bowman, Gabe Harris, Matthew Kirk, Qusheng Jin
Reduction potentials of redox couples are fundamental for understanding subsurface geochemistry and guiding water resource exploration and management. Reduction potentials are routinely calculated with the Nernst equation, which requires detailed chemical composition data and complex speciation modeling—factors that limit its application in large-scale or data-limited field settings. To address these limitations, we developed a data-driven simplified Nernst equation that estimates the reduction potentials of individual redox couples using only pH and temperature. By integrating geochemical modeling with a global groundwater chemistry dataset, we demonstrate that pH is the dominant control on redox potential, while temperature and redox species activity play secondary roles. The resulting formulation reduces computational demands while maintaining high-predictive accuracy across diverse groundwater environments. This approach enables rapid and scalable estimation of reduction potentials, supporting applications in geochemical modeling, contaminant transport prediction, and groundwater quality assessments. Furthermore, it offers a thermodynamically grounded yet practical framework for interpreting electron transfer dynamics in natural groundwater systems.
{"title":"A Data-Driven Simplified Nernst Equation for Estimating Reduction Potentials in Groundwater from pH and Temperature","authors":"Gordon Bowman, Gabe Harris, Matthew Kirk, Qusheng Jin","doi":"10.1111/gwat.70010","DOIUrl":"10.1111/gwat.70010","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Reduction potentials of redox couples are fundamental for understanding subsurface geochemistry and guiding water resource exploration and management. Reduction potentials are routinely calculated with the Nernst equation, which requires detailed chemical composition data and complex speciation modeling—factors that limit its application in large-scale or data-limited field settings. To address these limitations, we developed a data-driven simplified Nernst equation that estimates the reduction potentials of individual redox couples using only pH and temperature. By integrating geochemical modeling with a global groundwater chemistry dataset, we demonstrate that pH is the dominant control on redox potential, while temperature and redox species activity play secondary roles. The resulting formulation reduces computational demands while maintaining high-predictive accuracy across diverse groundwater environments. This approach enables rapid and scalable estimation of reduction potentials, supporting applications in geochemical modeling, contaminant transport prediction, and groundwater quality assessments. Furthermore, it offers a thermodynamically grounded yet practical framework for interpreting electron transfer dynamics in natural groundwater systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":12866,"journal":{"name":"Groundwater","volume":"63 5","pages":"725-735"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ngwa.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gwat.70010","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144796495","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Karst aquifers have evolved secondary porosity features that facilitate heterogeneous recharge and groundwater flow dynamics. These dynamics affect the natural spatial and temporal variability of water quality in the aquifer. However, when recharge occurs near urban and agricultural land use that can introduce contamination, the contamination can conflate natural water quality variability, generating convoluted signals in time and space. Most water quality investigations in karst aquifers rely on groundwater sampling at discrete locations such as wells or springs, which do not always capture the magnitude of water quality heterogeneity. Cave diving in phreatic caves can be used to explore this variability by using water quality sensors and discrete water chemistry samples to explore spatial and temporal water quality changes for improved and targeted water resource management. Our study uses cave diving to document the spatial and temporal variation in water quality within a phreatic cave system in the Floridan Aquifer System (FAS), a karst aquifer in northern Florida. We collect continuous 15-s measurements of dissolved oxygen (DO), temperature, pH, and specific conductance along a 1.1 km transect, which intersects multiple cave passages that drain into the primary cave passage. We also collect discrete water chemistry samples in three separate cave passages within the phreatic cave, as well as at the spring vent, to document spatial and seasonal variability in nutrients, organic matter, and major groundwater ions. Our results show that specific conductance, DO, temperature, and pH vary together spatially in consistent ways, which we use to identify cave passages that receive more direct recharge. Spatial and temporal variability across the cave system was most pronounced for NOx-N (nitrate + nitrite), DO, and dissolved organic carbon, while major ions showed minimal spatial variability but greater temporal variability. Relationships derived between specific conductance and NOx-N show a positive correlation, while relationships between ions associated with carbonate mineralogy and specific conductance are negatively correlated, which likely reflects the impact of recharge from agricultural land use surrounding the cave system. Our results highlight water quality complexity in phreatic caves and have implications for local water quality restoration efforts, interpreting water quality data collected at a discrete location, and provide guidance for future water quality studies in phreatic cave systems.
{"title":"Cave Diving Documents Spatial and Temporal Water Quality Variability in a Phreatic, Karst Cave System","authors":"Mahnoor Kamal, Patricia Spellman, Sunhye Kim","doi":"10.1111/gwat.70006","DOIUrl":"10.1111/gwat.70006","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Karst aquifers have evolved secondary porosity features that facilitate heterogeneous recharge and groundwater flow dynamics. These dynamics affect the natural spatial and temporal variability of water quality in the aquifer. However, when recharge occurs near urban and agricultural land use that can introduce contamination, the contamination can conflate natural water quality variability, generating convoluted signals in time and space. Most water quality investigations in karst aquifers rely on groundwater sampling at discrete locations such as wells or springs, which do not always capture the magnitude of water quality heterogeneity. Cave diving in phreatic caves can be used to explore this variability by using water quality sensors and discrete water chemistry samples to explore spatial and temporal water quality changes for improved and targeted water resource management. Our study uses cave diving to document the spatial and temporal variation in water quality within a phreatic cave system in the Floridan Aquifer System (FAS), a karst aquifer in northern Florida. We collect continuous 15-s measurements of dissolved oxygen (DO), temperature, pH, and specific conductance along a 1.1 km transect, which intersects multiple cave passages that drain into the primary cave passage. We also collect discrete water chemistry samples in three separate cave passages within the phreatic cave, as well as at the spring vent, to document spatial and seasonal variability in nutrients, organic matter, and major groundwater ions. Our results show that specific conductance, DO, temperature, and pH vary together spatially in consistent ways, which we use to identify cave passages that receive more direct recharge. Spatial and temporal variability across the cave system was most pronounced for NO<sub><i>x</i></sub>-N (nitrate + nitrite), DO, and dissolved organic carbon, while major ions showed minimal spatial variability but greater temporal variability. Relationships derived between specific conductance and NO<sub><i>x</i></sub>-N show a positive correlation, while relationships between ions associated with carbonate mineralogy and specific conductance are negatively correlated, which likely reflects the impact of recharge from agricultural land use surrounding the cave system. Our results highlight water quality complexity in phreatic caves and have implications for local water quality restoration efforts, interpreting water quality data collected at a discrete location, and provide guidance for future water quality studies in phreatic cave systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":12866,"journal":{"name":"Groundwater","volume":"63 5","pages":"685-703"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144755502","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}