Heart, Lung and Circulation最新文献

Aim: This study aimed to examine contemporary burden and treatment trends of atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients undergoing cardiac surgery in Australia and New Zealand. This allows comparison of contemporary practice with the Society of Thoracic Surgeons guideline recommendations for the surgical treatment of AF in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

Method: A 10-year retrospective review of the Australian & New Zealand Society of Cardiac & Thoracic Surgeons National Cardiac Surgery Database was performed, examining all adult cardiac surgery patients from 2011 to 2021. Patients were grouped by the presence or absence of AF, and simple descriptive statistical analysis was performed to assess baseline demographics and premorbid condition of the patients. The incidence of AF was analysed by type of surgery. Trends for surgical treatment of AF were then analysed using simple descriptive statistics, examining isolated left atrial appendage ligation, isolated surgical ablation, and combined ligation and ablation.

Results: In the last 10 years, the Australian & New Zealand Society of Cardiac & Thoracic Surgeons database has recorded 140,680 patients who underwent cardiac surgery. Atrial fibrillation (AF) was present in 21,077 patients (14%). Patients with AF were generally older (72.25 vs 66.65 years; p<0.001). Among patients undergoing cardiac surgery, AF was more common in female than in male patients (18% vs 13%, respectively). Patients with AF more often had a higher classification of dyspnoea according to the New York Heart Association and lower ejection fractions compared with their AF-free counterparts. The incidence of AF as a comorbid condition was more frequent in patients undergoing mitral valve surgery or combined coronary artery bypass grafting and valve surgery (aortic, mitral, or both) compared with those undergoing isolated coronary or aortic surgery. Only 11.90% (n=2,509) of patients with AF received a combined ablation and left atrial appendage ligation, and 19.54% (n=693) of those received a Cox-Maze IV ablation.

Conclusions: The burden of concomitant AF in patients undergoing cardiac surgery in Australia is higher than previously reported (14% vs 5%-11%). Despite strong recommendation for the surgical management of AF in patients undergoing cardiac surgery and clear evidence of its benefit, both left atrial appendage ligation and surgical ablation independently or concomitantly remain heavily underutilised in this cohort.

Background: Recent neutral randomised clinical trials have created clinical equipoise for treating obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) for managing cardiovascular risk. The importance of defining the links between OSA and cardiovascular disease is needed with the aim of advancing the robustness of future clinical trials. We aimed to define the clinical correlates and characterise surrogate cardiovascular markers in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and OSA.

Method: Overall, 66 patients diagnosed with ACS were studied. Patients underwent an unattended polysomnogram after hospital discharge (median [interquartile range] 62 [37-132] days). The Epworth Sleepiness Scale, Berlin, and STOP-BANG questionnaires were administered. Surrogate measures of vascular structure and function, and cardiovascular autonomic function were conducted. Pulse wave amplitude drop was derived from the pulse oximetry signals of the overnight polysomnogram.

Results: OSA (apnoea-hypopnea index [AHI] ≥5) was diagnosed in 94% of patients. Moderate-to-severe OSA (AHI≥15) was observed in 68% of patients. Daytime sleepiness (Epworth Sleepiness Scale ≥10) was reported in 17% of patients. OSA screening questionnaires were inadequate to identify moderate-to-severe OSA, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of approximately 0.64. Arterial stiffness (carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity, 6.1 [5.2-6.8] vs 7.4 [6.6-8.6] m/s, p=0.002) and carotid intima-media thickness (0.8 [0.7-1.0] vs 0.9 [0.8-1.0] mm, p=0.027) was elevated in patients with moderate-to-severe OSA. After adjusting for age, sex and body mass index, these relationships were not statistically significant. No relationships were observed in other surrogate cardiovascular markers.

Conclusions: A high prevalence of OSA in a mostly non-sleepy population with ACS was identified, highlighting a gross underdiagnosis of OSA among cardiovascular patients. The limitations of OSA screening questionnaires highlight the need for new models of OSA screening as part of cardiovascular risk management. A range of inconsistent abnormalities were observed in measures of vascular structure and function, and these appear to be largely explained by confounding factors. Further research is required to elucidate biomarkers for the presence and impact of OSA in ACS patients.

Background: Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors are novel medications for reducing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels. In 2020, the Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) began subsidising PCSK9 inhibitors for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease in patients with LDL-C >2.6 mmol/L despite statin and ezetimibe therapy. This criterion was expanded to LDL-C >1.8 mmol/L in 2022.

Method: A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients admitted to a quaternary hospital with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) between 2020-2022. PCSK9 inhibitor eligibility and prescribing patterns were compared between recurrent ACS patients (≥2 events within 5 years) and first-presentation ACS patients. Australian PBS 2020 and 2022 criteria were applied to assess eligibility.

Results: Of 817 ACS patients with LDL-C >1.8 mmol/L, 118 (14.4%) were categorised as recurrent ACS (33.9% female, mean age 67 years, LDL-C 2.9 mmol/L). When compared with first-presentation ACS patients (n=699), recurrent ACS patients had significantly higher proportions already on statin therapy (49.2% vs 6.0%, p<0.001) and ezetimibe (20.3% vs 2.4%, p<0.001). Recurrent ACS patients had significantly higher proportions of 2020 PBS-eligible patients (11.0% vs 1.3%, p<0.001) and 2022 PBS-eligible patients (20.3% vs 2.2%, p<0.001). There were no significant differences in PCSK9 inhibitor prescription rates among eligible patients (four of 13, 30.8% vs four of nine, 44.4%, p=0.51). Univariate binary logistic regression demonstrated that statin intolerance was significantly associated with PCSK9 inhibitor prescription (odds ratio 10; 95% confidence interval 1.3-79.3; p=0.029).

Conclusions: Despite significantly higher eligibility rates, PCSK9 inhibitor uptake remains low in recurrent ACS patients, demonstrating the need to raise further awareness about eligibility criteria and encourage proactive prescription to prevent recurrent cardiovascular events.

Background: The use of microaxial percutaneous left ventricular assist devices (pLVADs) in cardiogenic shock (CS) has increased in recent years, despite limited evidence, and data on sex disparities are particularly scarce. This study aimed to compare short-term outcomes between males and females.

Methods: Data were retrospectively collected from the Dresden Impella Registry, which is a large, prospective, single-centre registry that consecutively enrolled patients who received microaxial pLVAD. Inclusion criteria were CS due to left ventricular failure with serum lactate >4 mM. Patients with pLVAD other than Impella CP were excluded. The primary endpoint was the composite of all-cause mortality at 30 days or requirement of renal replacement therapy (RRT). Secondary endpoints were the components of the primary endpoint alone. Propensity score matched (PSM) analysis was used to adjust for baseline characteristics.

Results: A total of 319 male (69 years; body mass index, 26.7 kg/m²) and 113 female patients (74 years; 27.9 kg/m²) were included in the study. The primary composite endpoint occurred less frequently in female patients in the unmatched analysis (♂ 75.9% [n=239] vs ♀ 64.4% [n=72]; p=0.040) but not in the PSM analysis (♂ 81.1% [n=73] vs ♀ 68.9% [n=42]; p=0.056). However, females less frequently required RRT in both analyses (♂ 48.2% [n=126] vs ♀ 25.9% [n=25]; p=0.001; PSM: ♂ 49.1% [n=36] vs ♀ 23.3% [n=12]; p=0.007). All-cause mortality did not differ between the cohorts.

Conclusions: This study showed no differences in all-cause mortality at 30 days between male and female patients receiving microaxial pLVAD in CS. Larger studies are required to confirm whether female sex is associated with reduced requirement of RRT in CS treated with microaxial pLVAD.

Background: Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is an under-recognised but common genetic condition resulting in elevated levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and a high risk of premature coronary disease. The prevalence of FH among younger patients undergoing coronary bypass surgery is unknown, as is their post-surgical prognosis.

Method: This was a retrospective analysis of younger patients (aged <60 years) undergoing coronary bypass surgery at an Australian tertiary hospital between 2008 and 2022. A Dutch Lipid Clinical Network Score was calculated to determine the presence of underlying FH for each patient. Outcomes were FH prevalence, pre-surgical attainment of guideline-based secondary prevention LDL-C targets and post-surgical major adverse cardiovascular events.

Results: Overall, 590 eligible patients (mean age 53.7 years, 85.6% male) were followed over a median of 7.9 years (interquartile range 4.7-12.1). Eighty (80; 13.6%) patients were categorised as 'FH', 249 (42.2%) 'possible FH' and 261 (44.2%) 'non-FH'. Compared to the non-FH group, patients with FH were less likely to achieve target LDL-C <1.8 mmol/L (15 [18.8%] vs 119 [45.6%]; p<0.001) and had higher rates of adverse cardiovascular events in the years following surgery (adjusted odds ratio 2.52; 95% confidence interval 1.0-6.4; p<0.001).

Conclusions: FH is highly prevalent among younger patients undergoing coronary bypass surgery. These patients are less likely to achieve adequate LDL reduction and are at higher risk of further adverse events. Detection and appropriate treatment of FH prior to bypass surgery should be a clinical priority.

Aim: Mitral valve repair (MVr) is associated with more favourable long-term outcomes than mitral valve replacement (MVR) in cases of isolated mitral valve disease suitable for repair. However, there is debate regarding whether the superiority of MVr extends to patients with concomitant aortic and mitral valve disease. Therefore, this meta-analysis was conducted to compare the survival benefits between aortic valve replacement (AVR) plus MVr with a double valve replacement (DVR).

Method: A comprehensive literature search was conducted on PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane until 20 October 2022. Studies comparing MVr and MVR in patients undergoing concomitant AVR were included. The primary outcome was long-term survival. The secondary outcomes were early mortality, mitral valve reoperation, and valve-related adverse events.

Results: Sixteen studies with a total of 140,638 patients were included in this analysis. Patients undergoing AVR plus MVr exhibited a favourable trend in long-term survival (HR 0.85; 95% CI 0.71-1.03; p=0.10; I²=58%). The reconstructed Kaplan-Meier curve revealed that the long-term survival at 5, 10, and 15 years was higher in the AVR plus MVr (80.95%, 67.63%, and 51.18%, respectively) than in the DVR group (76.62%, 61.36%, 43.21%, respectively). Aortic valve replacement plus MVr had a lower risk of early mortality (RR 0.67; 95% CI 0.58-0.79; p<0.001; I²=77%), thromboembolic events (RR 0.81; 95% CI 0.67-0.98; p=0.03; I²=5%), and haemorrhagic events (RR 0.87; 95% CI 0.78-0.98; p=0.01; I²=59%). Moreover, both groups displayed comparable rates of mitral valve reoperation (HR 1.73; 95% CI 0.86-3.48; p=0.13; I²=60%) and infective endocarditis (RR 1.60; 95% CI 0.65-3.93; p=0.31; I²=0%). However, the rate of reoperation for AVR plus MVr significantly increased in rheumatic heart disease patients (HR 3.30, 95% CI 1.66-6.59; p<0.0001).

Conclusions: Compared with DVR, AVR plus MVr was associated with favourable long-term survival, reduced early mortality risk, and a lower incidence of thromboembolic and haemorrhagic events without increasing the risk of mitral valve reoperation or infective endocarditis in unselected patients. However, higher reoperation rates were observed in rheumatic heart disease patients undergoing AVR plus MVr.

Objective: To estimate the burden of transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis (ATTR-CA) through a cross- sectional 'snapshot' of Australian Amyloidosis Network (AAN) and New Zealand (NZ) specialist amyloidosis clinics.

Design, setting & participants: A prospective survey was performed of seven AAN/ specialist amyloidosis clinics across Australia and NZ. All centres were invited to contribute data; participating centres provided clinical and demographic data for patients with ATTR-CA reviewed in the 2022 calendar year. Patients with new or previously confirmed ATTR-CA reviewed in the 2022 calendar year were included. Diagnosis was established through a positive cardiac scintigraphy scan in the absence of a monoclonal gammopathy or through a cardiac biopsy staining positive with transthyretin (TTR).

Results: A total of 515 patients were reviewed across seven sites. A total of 302/515 (59%) were wild type TTR (ATTRwt), 63/515 (12%) were variant ATTR (ATTRv) and the remaining 150 (29%) had not undergone genetic testing at the time of data collection. A total of 455/515 (88%) patients were male. Compared to ATTRwt, patients with ATTRv had smaller left ventricular (LV) wall thickness (IVSd 14±3 mm vs 16±3mm, p<0.001), and better LV systolic function (LVGLS -15.4±5% vs -11.7±3%, p<0.001). Most patients, 387/515 (75%) were on at least one ATTR specific treatment, including EGCG (157), diflunisal (139), doxycycline (68) and tafamidis (78), acoramidis (33) and gene silencer therapies or monoclonal antibodies (23).

Conclusion: A significant number of patients with ATTR-CA are seen in specialist amyloidosis clinics across Australia and NZ. Most patients received specific amyloidosis therapy, thorough enrollment in clinical trials. With increased recognition of amyloidosis and newer therapies becoming available, the volume of patients seen in these clinics is likely to increase.