: Pest birds cause substantial and costly damage to crops. Managing birds is complex because (1) they are highly mobile, (2) they habituate quickly to many deterrents, (3) some species provide benefits to farmers by deterring and consuming pest insects, rodents, and other birds, and (4) birds are highly valued by many people. Thus, farmers have many issues to consider when developing bird management strategies. Here I discuss recent work indicating that farmer adoption of sustainable agricultural practices is more likely when practices are effective, clear guidelines for implementation are available, implementation is relatively easy, and when practices are linked, in farmers’ minds and logistically, with other farm management practices. This manuscript draws together information about these factors for common bird management tactics to aid in the development of sustainable bird management strategies by farmers and the development of education programs for farmers by extension personnel and researchers. Such strategies will necessarily involve combinations of tactics, following the framework of Integrated Pest Management.
{"title":"Supporting Farmer Adoption of Sustainable Bird Management Strategies","authors":"C. Lindell","doi":"10.26077/6DDA-B98D","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.26077/6DDA-B98D","url":null,"abstract":": Pest birds cause substantial and costly damage to crops. Managing birds is complex because (1) they are highly mobile, (2) they habituate quickly to many deterrents, (3) some species provide benefits to farmers by deterring and consuming pest insects, rodents, and other birds, and (4) birds are highly valued by many people. Thus, farmers have many issues to consider when developing bird management strategies. Here I discuss recent work indicating that farmer adoption of sustainable agricultural practices is more likely when practices are effective, clear guidelines for implementation are available, implementation is relatively easy, and when practices are linked, in farmers’ minds and logistically, with other farm management practices. This manuscript draws together information about these factors for common bird management tactics to aid in the development of sustainable bird management strategies by farmers and the development of education programs for farmers by extension personnel and researchers. Such strategies will necessarily involve combinations of tactics, following the framework of Integrated Pest Management.","PeriodicalId":13095,"journal":{"name":"Human–Wildlife Interactions","volume":"72 1","pages":"14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"85304240","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Since their intentional introduction into the United States in the 1800s, European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris) have become the fourth most common bird species and a nuisance bird pest in both urban and rural areas. Managers require better information about starling movement and habit-use patterns to effectively manage starling populations and the damage they cause. Thus, we revisited 6 radio-telemetry studies conducted during fall or winter between 2005 and 2010 to compare starling movements (n = 63 birds) and habitat use in 3 landscapes. Switching of roosting and foraging sites in habitat-sparse rural landscapes caused daytime (0900–1500 hours) radio fixes to be on average 2.6 to 6.3 times further from capture sites than either urban or exurban landscapes (P < 0.001). Roosts in urban city centers were smaller (<30,000 birds, minor roosts) than major roosts (>100,000 birds) 6–13 km away in industrial zones. Radio-tagged birds from city-center roosts occasionally switched to the outlying major roosts. A multitrack railroad overpass and a treed buffer zone were used as major roosts in urban landscapes. Birds traveling to roosts from primary foraging sites in exurban and rural landscapes would often pass over closer-lying minor roosts to reach major roosts in stands of emergent vegetation in large wetlands. Daytime minimum convex polygons ranged from 101–229 km2 (x̄ = 154 km2). Anthropogenic food resources (e.g., concentrated animal feeding operations, shipping yards, landfills, and abattoirs) were primary foraging sites. Wildlife resource managers can use this information to predict potential roosting and foraging sites and average areas to monitor when implementing programs in different landscapes. In addition to tracking roosting flights, we recommend viewing high-resolution aerial images to identify potential roosting and foraging habitats before implementing lethal culls (e.g., toxicant baiting).
{"title":"Movement Behavior of Radio-Tagged European Starlings in Urban, Rural, and Exurban Landscapes","authors":"Page E. Klug, H. Homan","doi":"10.26077/3145-950D","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.26077/3145-950D","url":null,"abstract":"Since their intentional introduction into the United States in the 1800s, European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris) have become the fourth most common bird species and a nuisance bird pest in both urban and rural areas. Managers require better information about starling movement and habit-use patterns to effectively manage starling populations and the damage they cause. Thus, we revisited 6 radio-telemetry studies conducted during fall or winter between 2005 and 2010 to compare starling movements (n = 63 birds) and habitat use in 3 landscapes. Switching of roosting and foraging sites in habitat-sparse rural landscapes caused daytime (0900–1500 hours) radio fixes to be on average 2.6 to 6.3 times further from capture sites than either urban or exurban landscapes (P < 0.001). Roosts in urban city centers were smaller (<30,000 birds, minor roosts) than major roosts (>100,000 birds) 6–13 km away in industrial zones. Radio-tagged birds from city-center roosts occasionally switched to the outlying major roosts. A multitrack railroad overpass and a treed buffer zone were used as major roosts in urban landscapes. Birds traveling to roosts from primary foraging sites in exurban and rural landscapes would often pass over closer-lying minor roosts to reach major roosts in stands of emergent vegetation in large wetlands. Daytime minimum convex polygons ranged from 101–229 km2 (x̄ = 154 km2). Anthropogenic food resources (e.g., concentrated animal feeding operations, shipping yards, landfills, and abattoirs) were primary foraging sites. Wildlife resource managers can use this information to predict potential roosting and foraging sites and average areas to monitor when implementing programs in different landscapes. In addition to tracking roosting flights, we recommend viewing high-resolution aerial images to identify potential roosting and foraging habitats before implementing lethal culls (e.g., toxicant baiting).","PeriodicalId":13095,"journal":{"name":"Human–Wildlife Interactions","volume":"11 1","pages":"10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"79726714","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The far-reaching impacts of COVID-19 on the entire planet have mobilized numerous calls to prevent similar pandemics in the future. Appeals have ranged from advocacy for the permanent closure of markets where wild animals may be sold, to banning all commercial use of wildlife, to significantly stepping up sanitary measures and monitoring along all food value chains. In this document, the Members of the Collaborative Partnership on Sustainable Wildlife Management (CPW) propose four guiding principles to assist practitioners and decision-makers in making practical and scientifically informed responses. These principles aim to reduce the risk of future pandemics originating from wild animals, at the same time as strengthening the conservation of wildlife whilst respecting livelihoods, food security and culture of diverse groups of people. The CPW promotes an integrated understanding of the complex interconnections and mutual dependencies between wildlife and people and works to increase cooperation and coordination on sustainable wildlife management issues among its members and partners. The FAO Forestry Division has served as the secretariat for the CPW since 2013 and is actively engaged in a wide range of the CPW's initiatives as a proactive member of the Partnership.
{"title":"The COVID-19 challenge: Zoonotic diseases and wildlife","authors":"Anonymous","doi":"10.4060/cb1163en","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4060/cb1163en","url":null,"abstract":"The far-reaching impacts of COVID-19 on the entire planet have mobilized numerous calls to prevent similar pandemics in the future. Appeals have ranged from advocacy for the permanent closure of markets where wild animals may be sold, to banning all commercial use of wildlife, to significantly stepping up sanitary measures and monitoring along all food value chains. In this document, the Members of the Collaborative Partnership on Sustainable Wildlife Management (CPW) propose four guiding principles to assist practitioners and decision-makers in making practical and scientifically informed responses. These principles aim to reduce the risk of future pandemics originating from wild animals, at the same time as strengthening the conservation of wildlife whilst respecting livelihoods, food security and culture of diverse groups of people. The CPW promotes an integrated understanding of the complex interconnections and mutual dependencies between wildlife and people and works to increase cooperation and coordination on sustainable wildlife management issues among its members and partners. The FAO Forestry Division has served as the secretariat for the CPW since 2013 and is actively engaged in a wide range of the CPW's initiatives as a proactive member of the Partnership.","PeriodicalId":13095,"journal":{"name":"Human–Wildlife Interactions","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"80636851","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Sarah A. M. Luttrell, S. Drovetski, N. F. Dahlan, Damani Eubanks, C. Dove
Knowing the exact species of birds involved in damaging collisions with aircraft (bird strikes) is paramount to managing and preventing these types of human–wildlife conflicts. While a standard genetic marker, or DNA barcode (mitochondrial DNA gene cytochrome-c oxidase 1, or CO1), can reliably identify most avian species, this marker cannot distinguish among some closely related species. Diving ducks within the genus Aythya are an example of congeneric waterfowl involved in bird strikes where several species pairs cannot be reliably identified with the standard DNA barcode. Here, we describe methods for using an additional genetic marker (mitochondrial DNA gene NADH dehydrogenase subunit 2, or ND2) for identification of 9 Aythya spp. Gene-specific phylogenetic trees and genetic distances among taxa reveal that ND2 is more effective than CO1 at genetic identification of diving ducks studied here. Compared with CO1, the ND2 gene tree is more statistically robust, has a minimum of 1.5 times greater genetic distance between sister clades, and resolves paraphyly in 2 clades. While CO1 is effective for identification of most bird strike cases, this study underscores the value of targeted incorporation of additional genetic markers for species identification of taxa that are known to be problematic using standard DNA barcoding.
{"title":"ND2 as an Additional Genetic Marker to Improve Identification of Diving Ducks Involved in Bird Strikes","authors":"Sarah A. M. Luttrell, S. Drovetski, N. F. Dahlan, Damani Eubanks, C. Dove","doi":"10.26077/4DC6-AD95","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.26077/4DC6-AD95","url":null,"abstract":"Knowing the exact species of birds involved in damaging collisions with aircraft (bird strikes) is paramount to managing and preventing these types of human–wildlife conflicts. While a standard genetic marker, or DNA barcode (mitochondrial DNA gene cytochrome-c oxidase 1, or CO1), can reliably identify most avian species, this marker cannot distinguish among some closely related species. Diving ducks within the genus Aythya are an example of congeneric waterfowl involved in bird strikes where several species pairs cannot be reliably identified with the standard DNA barcode. Here, we describe methods for using an additional genetic marker (mitochondrial DNA gene NADH dehydrogenase subunit 2, or ND2) for identification of 9 Aythya spp. Gene-specific phylogenetic trees and genetic distances among taxa reveal that ND2 is more effective than CO1 at genetic identification of diving ducks studied here. Compared with CO1, the ND2 gene tree is more statistically robust, has a minimum of 1.5 times greater genetic distance between sister clades, and resolves paraphyly in 2 clades. While CO1 is effective for identification of most bird strike cases, this study underscores the value of targeted incorporation of additional genetic markers for species identification of taxa that are known to be problematic using standard DNA barcoding.","PeriodicalId":13095,"journal":{"name":"Human–Wildlife Interactions","volume":"161 1","pages":"7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"83529398","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Advancing Best Practices for Aversion Conditioning (Humane Hazing) to Mitigate Human–Coyote Conflicts in Urban Areas","authors":"Lesley Sampson, Lauren E. Van Patter","doi":"10.26077/5CBF-F8F9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.26077/5CBF-F8F9","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":13095,"journal":{"name":"Human–Wildlife Interactions","volume":"36 1","pages":"7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"77437852","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
: Bird interactions with electric power lines can cause faults (e.g., disruption of electrical service). Faults on 500kV transmission lines in Montana, USA, which are integral to the Northwest USA power grid, became concerning during winter 2016–2017. In 2017 we found insulators contaminated with bird droppings and discovered a large nocturnal roost of common ravens ( Corvus corax ). To assess the potential magnitude of the impact of raven roosts on electric power transmission, we summarized fault data obtained from the Energy Management System and raven abundance data obtained from the Christmas Bird Count in central Montana from 2005 to 2020. We also conducted counts at 7 roosts in the study area in winter 2019–2020. We detected a positive relationship between the number of faults reported and raven abundance. The 3 largest roosts we surveyed peaked at 1,000–1,500 ravens on single evenings. The number of faults reported in winter 2019–2020 decreased after use of silicon-coated insulators, perch deterrents, and periodic washing of insulators. Increased raven populations throughout their range may cause similar conflicts for other electric utilities. Long-term management of ravens will need to integrate approaches at both local and landscape scales.
{"title":"The Emerging Conflict of Common Ravens Roosting on Electric Power Transmission Line Towers in Montana, USA","authors":"M. Restani, James S. Lueck","doi":"10.26077/8E0E-6B4B","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.26077/8E0E-6B4B","url":null,"abstract":": Bird interactions with electric power lines can cause faults (e.g., disruption of electrical service). Faults on 500kV transmission lines in Montana, USA, which are integral to the Northwest USA power grid, became concerning during winter 2016–2017. In 2017 we found insulators contaminated with bird droppings and discovered a large nocturnal roost of common ravens ( Corvus corax ). To assess the potential magnitude of the impact of raven roosts on electric power transmission, we summarized fault data obtained from the Energy Management System and raven abundance data obtained from the Christmas Bird Count in central Montana from 2005 to 2020. We also conducted counts at 7 roosts in the study area in winter 2019–2020. We detected a positive relationship between the number of faults reported and raven abundance. The 3 largest roosts we surveyed peaked at 1,000–1,500 ravens on single evenings. The number of faults reported in winter 2019–2020 decreased after use of silicon-coated insulators, perch deterrents, and periodic washing of insulators. Increased raven populations throughout their range may cause similar conflicts for other electric utilities. Long-term management of ravens will need to integrate approaches at both local and landscape scales.","PeriodicalId":13095,"journal":{"name":"Human–Wildlife Interactions","volume":"30 1","pages":"15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"82115669","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
R. Rocha, P. Borges, P. Cardoso, M. Kusrini, J. L. Martín-Esquivel, D. Menezes, Mário Mota‐Ferreira, S. F. Nunes, I. Órfão, C. Serra-Gonçalves, M. Sim-Sim, P. Sepúlveda, D. Teixeira, A. Traveset
Ricardo Rocha, CIBIO/InBIO-UP, Research Centre in Biodiversity and Genetic Resources, University of Porto, Rua Padre Armando Quintas, 4485-661 Vairão, Portugal; CEABN-InBIO, Centre for Applied Ecology “Prof. Baeta Neves,” Institute of Agronomy, University of Lisbon, Tapada da Ajuda, 1349-017 Lisbon, Portugal; and Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes, Faculty of Sciences, University of Lisbon, 1749-016 Lisbon, Portugal ricardo.nature@gmail.com Paulo A. V. Borges, Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes, Faculty of Sciences, University of Lisbon, 1749-016 Lisbon, Portugal; and Azorean Biodiversity Group (cE3c) and Universidade dos Açores – Faculty of Agriculture and Environment, Rua Capitão João d’Ávila, São Pedro, 9700-042 Angra do Heroísmo, Terceira, Açores, Portugal Pedro Cardoso, Laboratory for Integrative Biodiversity Research (LIBRe), Finnish Museum of Natural History, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland Mirza Dikari Kusrini, Faculty of Forestry, IPB University (Institut Pertanian Bogor), Jalan Ulin, Kampus Darmaga, Bogor 16680, Indonesia José Luis Martín-Esquivel, National Park of Teide, C. Dr Sixto Perera González, 25. 38300 La Orotava, Canary Islands, Spain Dília Menezes, Instituto das Florestas e Conservação da Natureza, IP-RAM, 9064-512 Funchal, Portugal Mário Mota-Ferreira, CIBIO/InBIO-UP, Research Centre in Biodiversity and Genetic Resources, University of Porto, Rua Padre Armando Quintas, 4485-661 Vairão, Portugal; CEABN-InBIO, Centre for Applied Ecology “Prof. Baeta Neves,” Institute of Agronomy, University of Lisbon, Tapada da Ajuda, 1349-017 Lisbon, Portugal Sara F. Nunes, Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes, Faculty of Sciences, University of Lisbon, 1749-016 Lisbon, Portugal; and Global Change and Conservation Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 65, Viikinkaari 1, 00014, Helsinki, Finland Inês Órfão, CFCUL – Centro de Filosofia Das Ciências da Universidade de Lisboa; and Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes, Faculty of Sciences, University of Lisbon, 1749016 Lisbon, Portugal Catarina Serra-Gonçalves, University of Tasmania, Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, School Road, Newnham, Tasmania 7250, Australia Manuela Sim-Sim, Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes, Faculty of Sciences, University of Lisbon, 1749-016 Lisbon, Portugal; and MUHNAC Museu Nacional de História Natural e da Ciência, Universidade de Lisboa, Rua da Escola Politécnica, 58, 1250-102 Lisboa, Portugal Pedro Sepúlveda, DROTA Direção Regional do Ordenamento do Território e Ambiente, Rua Dr. Pestana Júnior, 9064-506 Funchal, Portugal Dinarte Teixeira, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Madeira, 9020-105 Funchal, Portugal; Laboratory for Integrative Biodiversity Research (LIBRe), Finnish Museum of Natural History, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland; and Instituto das Florestas e Conservação da Natureza, IP
Ricardo Rocha, CIBIO/InBIO-UP，波尔图大学生物多样性和遗传资源研究中心，Rua Padre Armando quinas, 4485-661 vair，葡萄牙;CEABN-InBIO，应用生态中心“Baeta Neves教授”，里斯本大学农学研究所，葡萄牙里斯本，1349-017;里斯本大学理学院生态、进化与环境变化研究中心，葡萄牙里斯本，1749-016 ricardo.nature@gmail.com里斯本大学理学院生态、进化与环境变化研究中心，葡萄牙里斯本，1749-016;和亚速尔生物多样性小组(cE3c)和阿帕拉多尔斯大学农业与环境学院，Rua capitap o jo od ' Ávila, o Pedro, 9700-042 Angra do Heroísmo, Terceira，阿帕拉多尔斯，葡萄牙，赫尔辛基，赫尔辛基，芬兰，赫尔辛基大学，芬兰自然历史博物馆，综合生物多样性研究实验室(LIBRe)， Mirza Dikari Kusrini, IPB大学(Pertanian Bogor研究所)，Jalan Ulin, Kampus Darmaga，茂物16680，印度尼西亚josore Luis Martín-Esquivel，泰德国家公园，C. Sixto Perera博士González, 25岁。38300西班牙加那利群岛拉奥罗塔瓦Dília Florestas和自然保护研究所Menezes, IP-RAM, 9064-512 Funchal，葡萄牙Mário波尔图大学生物多样性和遗传资源研究中心Mota-Ferreira, CIBIO/InBIO-UP, Rua Padre Armando Quintas, 4485-661 vair，葡萄牙;CEABN-InBIO，应用生态中心“Baeta Neves教授”，里斯本大学农学研究所，Tapada da adjuda, 1349-017葡萄牙里斯本赫尔辛基大学全球变化与保护生物与环境科学学院，芬兰赫尔辛基Viikinkaari 100014邮政信箱65号Inês Órfão，中欧中欧-菲洛索亚中心Ciências里斯本大学;Catarina serra - gonalalves，塔斯马尼亚大学海洋与南极研究所，纽纳姆学校路，塔斯马尼亚7250，葡萄牙;Manuela Sim-Sim，里斯本大学理学院生态、进化与环境变化中心，里斯本，1749-016;葡萄牙里斯本大学国立自然博物馆História自然博物馆Ciência, politescola大道，58号，1250-102里斯本，葡萄牙佩德罗Sepúlveda, DROTA地区行政条例主管部门Território e Ambiente, Rua Dr. pesstana Júnior, 9064-506丰沙尔，葡萄牙马德拉大学生命科学学院，9020-105丰沙尔;赫尔辛基大学芬兰自然历史博物馆生物多样性综合研究实验室，赫尔辛基，芬兰;Anna Traveset，地中海高等研究所，IMEDEA (CSIC-UIB)， c/ Miquel marques21, Esporles07190，西班牙巴利阿里群岛马略卡岛
{"title":"Stone-Stacking as a Looming Threat to Rock-Dwelling Biodiversity","authors":"R. Rocha, P. Borges, P. Cardoso, M. Kusrini, J. L. Martín-Esquivel, D. Menezes, Mário Mota‐Ferreira, S. F. Nunes, I. Órfão, C. Serra-Gonçalves, M. Sim-Sim, P. Sepúlveda, D. Teixeira, A. Traveset","doi":"10.26077/SECN-2A27","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.26077/SECN-2A27","url":null,"abstract":"Ricardo Rocha, CIBIO/InBIO-UP, Research Centre in Biodiversity and Genetic Resources, University of Porto, Rua Padre Armando Quintas, 4485-661 Vairão, Portugal; CEABN-InBIO, Centre for Applied Ecology “Prof. Baeta Neves,” Institute of Agronomy, University of Lisbon, Tapada da Ajuda, 1349-017 Lisbon, Portugal; and Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes, Faculty of Sciences, University of Lisbon, 1749-016 Lisbon, Portugal ricardo.nature@gmail.com Paulo A. V. Borges, Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes, Faculty of Sciences, University of Lisbon, 1749-016 Lisbon, Portugal; and Azorean Biodiversity Group (cE3c) and Universidade dos Açores – Faculty of Agriculture and Environment, Rua Capitão João d’Ávila, São Pedro, 9700-042 Angra do Heroísmo, Terceira, Açores, Portugal Pedro Cardoso, Laboratory for Integrative Biodiversity Research (LIBRe), Finnish Museum of Natural History, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland Mirza Dikari Kusrini, Faculty of Forestry, IPB University (Institut Pertanian Bogor), Jalan Ulin, Kampus Darmaga, Bogor 16680, Indonesia José Luis Martín-Esquivel, National Park of Teide, C. Dr Sixto Perera González, 25. 38300 La Orotava, Canary Islands, Spain Dília Menezes, Instituto das Florestas e Conservação da Natureza, IP-RAM, 9064-512 Funchal, Portugal Mário Mota-Ferreira, CIBIO/InBIO-UP, Research Centre in Biodiversity and Genetic Resources, University of Porto, Rua Padre Armando Quintas, 4485-661 Vairão, Portugal; CEABN-InBIO, Centre for Applied Ecology “Prof. Baeta Neves,” Institute of Agronomy, University of Lisbon, Tapada da Ajuda, 1349-017 Lisbon, Portugal Sara F. Nunes, Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes, Faculty of Sciences, University of Lisbon, 1749-016 Lisbon, Portugal; and Global Change and Conservation Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 65, Viikinkaari 1, 00014, Helsinki, Finland Inês Órfão, CFCUL – Centro de Filosofia Das Ciências da Universidade de Lisboa; and Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes, Faculty of Sciences, University of Lisbon, 1749016 Lisbon, Portugal Catarina Serra-Gonçalves, University of Tasmania, Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, School Road, Newnham, Tasmania 7250, Australia Manuela Sim-Sim, Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes, Faculty of Sciences, University of Lisbon, 1749-016 Lisbon, Portugal; and MUHNAC Museu Nacional de História Natural e da Ciência, Universidade de Lisboa, Rua da Escola Politécnica, 58, 1250-102 Lisboa, Portugal Pedro Sepúlveda, DROTA Direção Regional do Ordenamento do Território e Ambiente, Rua Dr. Pestana Júnior, 9064-506 Funchal, Portugal Dinarte Teixeira, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Madeira, 9020-105 Funchal, Portugal; Laboratory for Integrative Biodiversity Research (LIBRe), Finnish Museum of Natural History, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland; and Instituto das Florestas e Conservação da Natureza, IP","PeriodicalId":13095,"journal":{"name":"Human–Wildlife Interactions","volume":"25 1","pages":"17"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"85530150","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：