Pub Date : 2025-12-15DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2025.12.027
Catherine G Pratt, Nicolas Noriega, Jenna N Whitrock, Michela M Carter, Allison N Moore, Tiffany E Kaiser, Kristina H Lemon, Keith Luckett, Michael Schoech, Khurram Bari, Ralph C Quillin, Shimul A Shah
Background: Hepatitis C virus (HCV)-discordant liver transplants (LT), nonviremic and viremic, were first shown at our center as safe and efficacious for HCV-negative recipients in the short-term. This review evaluates HCV-discordant LT long-term outcomes.
Methods: All HCV-discordant deceased donor LT from 03/2016-06/2023 were reviewed in this retrospective, single-center study.
Results: 194 HCV-discordant LTs (96 (49.5 %) nucleic acid test (NAT)-negative and 98 (50.5 %) NAT-positive) were evaluated with a median follow-up of 53 months. Baseline liver biopsies of 139 (71.6 %) allografts, report 47 (24.2 %) no fibrosis, 27 (13.9 %) stage 1 fibrosis, and 65 (33.5 %) stage 2 fibrosis. Stage 2 fibrosis was higher among NAT-positive allografts (46.9 % vs. 19.8 %). Seven (6.3 %) NAT-negative allograft recipients experienced HCV transmission. One (1.1 %) NAT-positive allograft recipient experienced early HCV relapse, requiring additional treatment. All treated recipients achieved sustained viral response (SVR). There was no difference in patient or graft survival by allograft NAT status or fibrosis stage.
Conclusion: This is first report to show HCV-discordant LT exhibit low rates of relapse, achieve long-term SVR and have similar patient and graft survival regardless of allograft HCV viremia or fibrosis; thus, justifying their use for transplantation in the long-term.
背景:丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)-非病毒毒肝移植(LT)和病毒毒肝移植(LT)在我们中心首次被证明在短期内对丙型肝炎阴性受体是安全有效的。本综述评估了hcv不一致的LT长期预后。方法:在这项回顾性单中心研究中,对2016年3月至2016年6月期间所有hcv不一致的已故肝移植供者进行回顾性分析。结果:194例hcv -不一致LTs(核酸检测(NAT)阴性96例(49.5%),阳性98例(50.5%)),中位随访53个月。139例(71.6%)同种异体移植物的基线肝活检报告,47例(24.2%)无纤维化,27例(13.9%)1期纤维化,65例(33.5%)2期纤维化。nat阳性同种异体移植物的2期纤维化更高(46.9% vs. 19.8%)。7名(6.3%)nat阴性的同种异体移植受者经历了HCV传播。一名(1.1%)nat阳性的同种异体移植受者经历了早期HCV复发,需要额外的治疗。所有接受治疗的受者均获得了持续的病毒应答(SVR)。同种异体NAT状态或纤维化分期对患者或移植物的生存没有影响。结论:这是第一个报告显示HCV-不一致的LT具有低复发率,实现长期SVR,并且无论异体移植HCV病毒血症或纤维化具有相似的患者和移植物生存;因此,证明它们用于长期移植是合理的。
{"title":"Follow up and safety of use of hepatitis C virus discordant liver transplants.","authors":"Catherine G Pratt, Nicolas Noriega, Jenna N Whitrock, Michela M Carter, Allison N Moore, Tiffany E Kaiser, Kristina H Lemon, Keith Luckett, Michael Schoech, Khurram Bari, Ralph C Quillin, Shimul A Shah","doi":"10.1016/j.hpb.2025.12.027","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2025.12.027","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hepatitis C virus (HCV)-discordant liver transplants (LT), nonviremic and viremic, were first shown at our center as safe and efficacious for HCV-negative recipients in the short-term. This review evaluates HCV-discordant LT long-term outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All HCV-discordant deceased donor LT from 03/2016-06/2023 were reviewed in this retrospective, single-center study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>194 HCV-discordant LTs (96 (49.5 %) nucleic acid test (NAT)-negative and 98 (50.5 %) NAT-positive) were evaluated with a median follow-up of 53 months. Baseline liver biopsies of 139 (71.6 %) allografts, report 47 (24.2 %) no fibrosis, 27 (13.9 %) stage 1 fibrosis, and 65 (33.5 %) stage 2 fibrosis. Stage 2 fibrosis was higher among NAT-positive allografts (46.9 % vs. 19.8 %). Seven (6.3 %) NAT-negative allograft recipients experienced HCV transmission. One (1.1 %) NAT-positive allograft recipient experienced early HCV relapse, requiring additional treatment. All treated recipients achieved sustained viral response (SVR). There was no difference in patient or graft survival by allograft NAT status or fibrosis stage.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This is first report to show HCV-discordant LT exhibit low rates of relapse, achieve long-term SVR and have similar patient and graft survival regardless of allograft HCV viremia or fibrosis; thus, justifying their use for transplantation in the long-term.</p>","PeriodicalId":13229,"journal":{"name":"Hpb","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145900381","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-15DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2025.12.019
Wangxin Zhou, Shengwei Ji, Chunjie Zhang, Baoqing Liu, Hong Hong, Maowei Pei
Background: The optimal timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) in mild acute biliary pancreatitis (MABP) remains debated. This study compared early (within 72 h) versus delayed LC outcomes.
Methods: A randomized trial at Zhejiang Hospital assigned 120 MABP patients to early or delayed LC. Demographics, complications, operative outcomes, and hospital stay were analyzed.
Results: There were no differences in baseline demographics, overall complication rates (10 % vs. 8.3 %; P = 0.752), intraoperative blood loss (33.93 ± 17.68 mL vs. 37.08 ± 30.97 mL; P = 0.593) or conversion to open surgery rate (3.3 % vs. 5.0 %; P = 1.00) between the two groups. There were no recurrent biliary events, postoperative readmissions, reoperations, or deaths in either group; However, the early LC group demonstrated significant advantages in intraoperative adhesions (80 % vs. 93.3 %; P < 0.05), procedure time (61.87 ± 12.54 vs. 66.77 ± 12.11 min, P < 0.05) and the length of hospital stay (5 days vs. 7 days, P < 0.05).
Conclusion: For patients with MABP, early LC performed within 72 h of admission significantly reduces hospital length of stay and procedure time, without increasing perioperative complication rates or measures of procedural difficulty.
背景:轻度急性胆源性胰腺炎(MABP)的腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)的最佳时机仍有争议。本研究比较了早期(72小时内)和延迟LC的结果。方法:浙江医院的一项随机试验将120例MABP患者分配到早期或延迟LC。分析了人口统计学、并发症、手术结果和住院时间。结果:两组患者在基线人口统计学、总并发症发生率(10%对8.3%,P = 0.752)、术中出血量(33.93±17.68 mL对37.08±30.97 mL, P = 0.593)和中转开腹率(3.3%对5.0%,P = 1.00)方面均无差异。两组患者均无胆道事件复发、术后再入院、再手术或死亡;早期LC组在术中粘连(80% vs. 93.3%, P < 0.05)、手术时间(61.87±12.54 vs. 66.77±12.11 min, P < 0.05)、住院时间(5天vs. 7天,P < 0.05)方面均有显著优势。结论:对于MABP患者,在入院后72小时内进行早期LC可显著缩短住院时间和手术时间,且不增加围手术期并发症发生率或手术难度。
{"title":"Randomized controlled trial of early versus late cholecystectomy in patients with mild acute pancreatitis.","authors":"Wangxin Zhou, Shengwei Ji, Chunjie Zhang, Baoqing Liu, Hong Hong, Maowei Pei","doi":"10.1016/j.hpb.2025.12.019","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2025.12.019","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The optimal timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) in mild acute biliary pancreatitis (MABP) remains debated. This study compared early (within 72 h) versus delayed LC outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A randomized trial at Zhejiang Hospital assigned 120 MABP patients to early or delayed LC. Demographics, complications, operative outcomes, and hospital stay were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no differences in baseline demographics, overall complication rates (10 % vs. 8.3 %; P = 0.752), intraoperative blood loss (33.93 ± 17.68 mL vs. 37.08 ± 30.97 mL; P = 0.593) or conversion to open surgery rate (3.3 % vs. 5.0 %; P = 1.00) between the two groups. There were no recurrent biliary events, postoperative readmissions, reoperations, or deaths in either group; However, the early LC group demonstrated significant advantages in intraoperative adhesions (80 % vs. 93.3 %; P < 0.05), procedure time (61.87 ± 12.54 vs. 66.77 ± 12.11 min, P < 0.05) and the length of hospital stay (5 days vs. 7 days, P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For patients with MABP, early LC performed within 72 h of admission significantly reduces hospital length of stay and procedure time, without increasing perioperative complication rates or measures of procedural difficulty.</p>","PeriodicalId":13229,"journal":{"name":"Hpb","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145889158","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Solitary colorectal liver metastasis (SCRLM) exhibits substantial heterogeneity in recurrence patterns after hepatic resection, yet individualized prediction tools for recurrence-free survival (RFS) are lacking.
Methods: In this multicenter retrospective study, 698 SCRLM patients undergoing hepatic resection were analyzed (training cohort: n=574; validation cohort: n=124). RFS was the primary endpoint. Three predictive models-random survival forest (RSF), Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM), and eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost)-were developed and compared. Model performance was assessed via concordance index (C-index), time-dependent area under the ROC curve (AUROC), and calibration plots.
Results: The XGBoost model achieved the best performance, with AUROCs of 0.93 and 0.87 at 1 year, and 0.89 and 0.86 at 3 years, in the training and validation cohorts, respectively. Compared with the modified Clinical Score (m-CS), the model demonstrated significantly higher discrimination at 1, 2, and 3 years (all P < 0.001), and also identified a subgroup of patients more likely to benefit from postoperative chemotherapy. A user-friendly online tool was developed for clinical application: https://scrlm.shinyapps.io/scrlmapp/.
Conclusion: We developed and validated a machine learning-based model for SCRLM, enabling individualized recurrence risk prediction and guiding postoperative chemotherapy decisions. This approach may improve outcomes while reducing overtreatment.
{"title":"Machine learning model for recurrence-free survival in solitary resectable colorectal liver metastasis.","authors":"Mingshuai Wang, Jianli Duan, Hongwei Wang, Yuhong Li, Baocai Xing","doi":"10.1016/j.hpb.2025.12.024","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2025.12.024","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Solitary colorectal liver metastasis (SCRLM) exhibits substantial heterogeneity in recurrence patterns after hepatic resection, yet individualized prediction tools for recurrence-free survival (RFS) are lacking.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this multicenter retrospective study, 698 SCRLM patients undergoing hepatic resection were analyzed (training cohort: n=574; validation cohort: n=124). RFS was the primary endpoint. Three predictive models-random survival forest (RSF), Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM), and eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost)-were developed and compared. Model performance was assessed via concordance index (C-index), time-dependent area under the ROC curve (AUROC), and calibration plots.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The XGBoost model achieved the best performance, with AUROCs of 0.93 and 0.87 at 1 year, and 0.89 and 0.86 at 3 years, in the training and validation cohorts, respectively. Compared with the modified Clinical Score (m-CS), the model demonstrated significantly higher discrimination at 1, 2, and 3 years (all P < 0.001), and also identified a subgroup of patients more likely to benefit from postoperative chemotherapy. A user-friendly online tool was developed for clinical application: https://scrlm.shinyapps.io/scrlmapp/.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We developed and validated a machine learning-based model for SCRLM, enabling individualized recurrence risk prediction and guiding postoperative chemotherapy decisions. This approach may improve outcomes while reducing overtreatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":13229,"journal":{"name":"Hpb","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145910628","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-13DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2025.12.022
Marco Palucci, Gabriela D Angel-Millán, Fabio Giannone, Mariantonietta Alagia, Celeste Del Basso, Marco Lodin, Igor Monsellato, Federico Sangiuolo, Gianluca Cassese, Fabrizio Panaro
Background: Intraoperative localization of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) is challenging, particularly for small lesions during minimally invasive surgery due to the lack of tactile feedback. Indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence imaging is a promising technique to enhance tumor visualization and surgical guidance. This systematic review evaluates current evidence on ICG use in pNET surgery, focusing on indications, timing, dosage, and intraoperative strategies.
Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science was conducted up to May 2025, following PRISMA guidelines. Included studies reported intraoperative ICG use in pNET surgery. Preclinical studies, non-English articles, and those lacking data on ICG protocol or dosage were excluded.
Results: Fifteen studies involving 43 patients were included. Diagnoses were insulinoma (39.5 %), unspecified pNETs (58.2 %), and one case of neuroendocrine hyperplasia. ICG identified tumors in 88.4 % of cases, with a positive predictive value of 95.0 %. ICG was mostly administered intravenously after pancreatic exposure, with doses ranging from 1 to 25 mg. Fluorescence appeared within 5 min and was homogeneous in 97.4 % of cases. No adverse events were reported.
Discussion: ICG fluorescence is a safe and effective tool for localizing pNETs. Further studies are needed to standardize protocols and optimize clinical use.
背景:胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤(pNETs)的术中定位具有挑战性,特别是微创手术中由于缺乏触觉反馈的小病变。吲哚菁绿(ICG)荧光成像是一种很有前途的技术,可以增强肿瘤的可视化和手术指导。本系统综述评估了目前在pNET手术中使用ICG的证据,重点是指征、时机、剂量和术中策略。方法:系统检索PubMed, Embase和Web of Science,直到2025年5月,遵循PRISMA指南。纳入的研究报告了术中ICG在pNET手术中的应用。排除了临床前研究、非英文文章以及缺乏ICG方案或剂量数据的研究。结果:纳入15项研究,共43例患者。诊断为胰岛素瘤(39.5%),不明pNETs(58.2%), 1例神经内分泌增生。ICG对肿瘤的鉴别率为88.4%,阳性预测值为95.0%。ICG主要在胰腺暴露后静脉注射,剂量范围为1至25毫克。荧光在5分钟内出现,97.4%的病例荧光均匀。无不良事件报告。讨论:ICG荧光是一种安全有效的pNETs定位工具。需要进一步的研究来规范方案和优化临床应用。
{"title":"A systematic review of the application of indocyanine green in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: Technical details, surgical indications, and outcomes.","authors":"Marco Palucci, Gabriela D Angel-Millán, Fabio Giannone, Mariantonietta Alagia, Celeste Del Basso, Marco Lodin, Igor Monsellato, Federico Sangiuolo, Gianluca Cassese, Fabrizio Panaro","doi":"10.1016/j.hpb.2025.12.022","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2025.12.022","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intraoperative localization of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) is challenging, particularly for small lesions during minimally invasive surgery due to the lack of tactile feedback. Indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence imaging is a promising technique to enhance tumor visualization and surgical guidance. This systematic review evaluates current evidence on ICG use in pNET surgery, focusing on indications, timing, dosage, and intraoperative strategies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science was conducted up to May 2025, following PRISMA guidelines. Included studies reported intraoperative ICG use in pNET surgery. Preclinical studies, non-English articles, and those lacking data on ICG protocol or dosage were excluded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen studies involving 43 patients were included. Diagnoses were insulinoma (39.5 %), unspecified pNETs (58.2 %), and one case of neuroendocrine hyperplasia. ICG identified tumors in 88.4 % of cases, with a positive predictive value of 95.0 %. ICG was mostly administered intravenously after pancreatic exposure, with doses ranging from 1 to 25 mg. Fluorescence appeared within 5 min and was homogeneous in 97.4 % of cases. No adverse events were reported.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>ICG fluorescence is a safe and effective tool for localizing pNETs. Further studies are needed to standardize protocols and optimize clinical use.</p>","PeriodicalId":13229,"journal":{"name":"Hpb","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145862959","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-13DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2025.12.020
Ahmad Mahamid
{"title":"Correspondence: \"Impact of post-hepatectomy liver failure on recurrence following major hepatectomy for colorectal cancer liver metastases\".","authors":"Ahmad Mahamid","doi":"10.1016/j.hpb.2025.12.020","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2025.12.020","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":13229,"journal":{"name":"Hpb","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145878222","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-08DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2025.12.016
Sini Takala, Hanna Koppatz, Arno Nordin, Ville Sallinen
Background: Few population-based studies exist for gallbladder cancer (GBC). This study explored incidence, diagnostics, treatment, and survival of patients with GBC in a national cohort.
Methods: Patients with GBC during 2006-2019 in Finland were included from Finnish Cancer Registry with manual patient data verification.
Results: GBC was diagnosed in 1183 patients. Overall incidence was 1.56:100,000 and it decreased over time (from 1.81 to 1.35, p < 0.001). For detailed analysis, 1016 patients were included. The proportion of patients with T2-T3 increased (from 46 % to 65 %; p < 0.001) and T4 decreased (from 35 % to 18 %; p < 0.001). Similarly, the proportion of patients with stage IVA decreased (from 10 % to 4 %, p = 0.002) and stage II increased (from 12 % to 20 %, p = 0.006). In total, 185 (18 %) patients underwent curative-intent surgery with a 92 % R0 resection rate. The proportion of curative-intent surgery increased (from 15 % to 23 %, p = 0.013), as well as use of adjuvant (from 19 % to 54 %, p < 0.001) and systemic chemotherapy (from 31.4 % to 42.1 %, p = 0.014). Median overall survival was 7 months and 5-year overall survival 14 %, which improved during the study period (from 12 % to 14 %, p = 0.007).
Conclusion: The incidence of GBC decreased, and overall survival improved, likely due to increased surgical and oncological treatments.
{"title":"Epidemiology and treatment outcomes of gallbladder cancer in Finland - a nationwide study.","authors":"Sini Takala, Hanna Koppatz, Arno Nordin, Ville Sallinen","doi":"10.1016/j.hpb.2025.12.016","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2025.12.016","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Few population-based studies exist for gallbladder cancer (GBC). This study explored incidence, diagnostics, treatment, and survival of patients with GBC in a national cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with GBC during 2006-2019 in Finland were included from Finnish Cancer Registry with manual patient data verification.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>GBC was diagnosed in 1183 patients. Overall incidence was 1.56:100,000 and it decreased over time (from 1.81 to 1.35, p < 0.001). For detailed analysis, 1016 patients were included. The proportion of patients with T2-T3 increased (from 46 % to 65 %; p < 0.001) and T4 decreased (from 35 % to 18 %; p < 0.001). Similarly, the proportion of patients with stage IVA decreased (from 10 % to 4 %, p = 0.002) and stage II increased (from 12 % to 20 %, p = 0.006). In total, 185 (18 %) patients underwent curative-intent surgery with a 92 % R0 resection rate. The proportion of curative-intent surgery increased (from 15 % to 23 %, p = 0.013), as well as use of adjuvant (from 19 % to 54 %, p < 0.001) and systemic chemotherapy (from 31.4 % to 42.1 %, p = 0.014). Median overall survival was 7 months and 5-year overall survival 14 %, which improved during the study period (from 12 % to 14 %, p = 0.007).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The incidence of GBC decreased, and overall survival improved, likely due to increased surgical and oncological treatments.</p>","PeriodicalId":13229,"journal":{"name":"Hpb","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145827650","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-06DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2025.12.008
Sander R W J Martens, Mike van Dooren, Jarmila van der Bilt, Marieke T de Boer, Djamila Boerma, Philip Bos, Andries E Braat, Steve M M de Castro, Bartholomeus J G A Corten, Freek Daams, Joris I Erdmann, Floris Ferenschild, Ansje S Fortuin, Anna van Geloven, Erik van der Hoeven, Rutger Klicks, Flip M Kruyt, Barbara S Langenhoff, Mike S L Liem, Philip V M Linsen, Misha Luyer, Vincent B Nieuwenhuijs, Pim Olthof, Peter W Plaisier, Charles van Rossem, Ruud Schrauwen, Jennifer Schreinemakers, Gian P Serafino, Ernst J Spillenaar Bilgen, Koen Talsma, Merel M Tielemans, Charlotte J Tutein Nolthenius, Elise A J de Savornin Lohman, Philip R de Reuver
Background: Patients with gallbladder polyps (GPs) are frequently subject to surveillance or cholecystectomy due to a risk of malignancy. As most GPs prove to be benign, potential overtreatment may impact quality of life (QoL). This study aimed to evaluate QoL in patients with GPs, compare it to the general population, and identify factors associated with QoL.
Methods: Patients diagnosed with GPs were included from 26 Dutch centres from 2018 to 2020, and followed until 2024. QoL was assessed at multiple time points using generic (EQ-5D) and disease-specific (GIQLI) instruments. Demographics, imaging, and surgical data were analysed.
Results: Among 207 patients, 42 (20.3 %) underwent cholecystectomy; neoplastic polyps were found in 3 (1.4 %). Overall, baseline EQ-5D scores were similar to the general population (0.85 vs 0.87; p = 0.20), while GIQLI scores were lower (116.1 vs 122.6; p < 0.001). Anxiety was reported by 39 % and was the strongest predictor of reduced QoL (EQ-5D: β = -0.095; GIQLI: β = -15.49; p < 0.001). QoL was not associated with GP characteristics.
Conclusion: GPs are associated with reduced QoL, driven predominantly by anxiety. Structured counselling on low malignancy risk and less intensive surveillance may alleviate anxiety and reduce overtreatment.
背景:胆囊息肉(GPs)患者由于有恶性肿瘤的风险,经常接受监测或胆囊切除术。由于大多数全科医生被证明是良性的,潜在的过度治疗可能影响生活质量(QoL)。本研究旨在评估全科医生患者的生活质量,将其与普通人群进行比较,并确定与生活质量相关的因素。方法:从2018年至2020年,从26个荷兰中心纳入诊断为全科医生的患者,并随访至2024年。使用通用(EQ-5D)和疾病特异性(GIQLI)仪器在多个时间点评估生活质量。对人口统计学、影像学和手术资料进行分析。结果:207例患者中,42例(20.3%)行胆囊切除术;3例(1.4%)发现肿瘤性息肉。总体而言,基线EQ-5D评分与一般人群相似(0.85 vs 0.87; p = 0.20),而GIQLI评分较低(116.1 vs 122.6; p < 0.001)。39%的人报告焦虑,并且是生活质量降低的最强预测因子(EQ-5D: β = -0.095; GIQLI: β = -15.49; p < 0.001)。生活质量与GP特征无关。结论:全科医生与生活质量下降有关,主要由焦虑引起。低恶性肿瘤风险的结构化咨询和不那么密集的监测可以减轻焦虑和减少过度治疗。
{"title":"Quality of life in patients with gallbladder polyps: a multicentre prospective cohort study.","authors":"Sander R W J Martens, Mike van Dooren, Jarmila van der Bilt, Marieke T de Boer, Djamila Boerma, Philip Bos, Andries E Braat, Steve M M de Castro, Bartholomeus J G A Corten, Freek Daams, Joris I Erdmann, Floris Ferenschild, Ansje S Fortuin, Anna van Geloven, Erik van der Hoeven, Rutger Klicks, Flip M Kruyt, Barbara S Langenhoff, Mike S L Liem, Philip V M Linsen, Misha Luyer, Vincent B Nieuwenhuijs, Pim Olthof, Peter W Plaisier, Charles van Rossem, Ruud Schrauwen, Jennifer Schreinemakers, Gian P Serafino, Ernst J Spillenaar Bilgen, Koen Talsma, Merel M Tielemans, Charlotte J Tutein Nolthenius, Elise A J de Savornin Lohman, Philip R de Reuver","doi":"10.1016/j.hpb.2025.12.008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2025.12.008","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with gallbladder polyps (GPs) are frequently subject to surveillance or cholecystectomy due to a risk of malignancy. As most GPs prove to be benign, potential overtreatment may impact quality of life (QoL). This study aimed to evaluate QoL in patients with GPs, compare it to the general population, and identify factors associated with QoL.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients diagnosed with GPs were included from 26 Dutch centres from 2018 to 2020, and followed until 2024. QoL was assessed at multiple time points using generic (EQ-5D) and disease-specific (GIQLI) instruments. Demographics, imaging, and surgical data were analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 207 patients, 42 (20.3 %) underwent cholecystectomy; neoplastic polyps were found in 3 (1.4 %). Overall, baseline EQ-5D scores were similar to the general population (0.85 vs 0.87; p = 0.20), while GIQLI scores were lower (116.1 vs 122.6; p < 0.001). Anxiety was reported by 39 % and was the strongest predictor of reduced QoL (EQ-5D: β = -0.095; GIQLI: β = -15.49; p < 0.001). QoL was not associated with GP characteristics.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>GPs are associated with reduced QoL, driven predominantly by anxiety. Structured counselling on low malignancy risk and less intensive surveillance may alleviate anxiety and reduce overtreatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":13229,"journal":{"name":"Hpb","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145800498","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-06DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2025.12.001
Thomas F Stoop, Kishan R D Lutchman, Rutger T Theijse, Patrik Larsson, Atsushi Oba, Bas Groot Koerkamp, Casper H J van Eijck, Christopher L Wolfgang, Elena Rangelova, Giovanni Marchegiani, Itaru Endo, Jin-Young Jang, John M Primrose, Jose M Ramia, Matthew H G Katz, Mohammed Abu Hilal, Poya Ghorbani, Shailesh V Shrikhande, Thilo Hackert, William H Nealon, Mark J Truty, Marco Del Chiaro, Marc G Besselink
Background: Staging laparoscopy (SL) is performed to detect occult metastases in patients with localized pancreatic cancer. However, current guideline recommendations vary widely on routinely performing SL. This global survey investigated use and indications of SL.
Methods: An online survey was sent to members of nine international societies and working groups. Information was obtained about SL use, indications SL and adjunct diagnostic modalities across four clinical scenarios.
Results: Among 617 responding surgeons (76 countries, six continents), 82% used SL which varied between regions (Americas 90%, Asia 85%, Oceania 81%, Europe 76%, Africa 59%; P < 0.050). Most perform SL during the same session as the scheduled laparotomy (63-79%). A SL was mainly performed at the time of upfront surgery (71%), after (60%) or before (37%) neoadjuvant/induction therapy, and before radiotherapy (31%). SL was mainly performed in selected patients, either based on indeterminate/suspicious lesions on cross-sectional imaging (78-87%), resectability status (54-64%), and/or elevated CA19-9 level (60-69%). Most common used adjuncts were cytological lavage (37-55%) and intra-abdominal liver ultrasonography (36-50%).
Conclusion: Despite considerable global variability, SL is widely used to detect occult metastases in pancreatic cancer, mainly in high-risk patients and often during the scheduled laparotomy. The observed variability highlights the need for more evidence leading to stronger guideline recommendations.
{"title":"Staging laparoscopy to detect occult metastases in localized pancreatic cancer: global survey among nine international societies.","authors":"Thomas F Stoop, Kishan R D Lutchman, Rutger T Theijse, Patrik Larsson, Atsushi Oba, Bas Groot Koerkamp, Casper H J van Eijck, Christopher L Wolfgang, Elena Rangelova, Giovanni Marchegiani, Itaru Endo, Jin-Young Jang, John M Primrose, Jose M Ramia, Matthew H G Katz, Mohammed Abu Hilal, Poya Ghorbani, Shailesh V Shrikhande, Thilo Hackert, William H Nealon, Mark J Truty, Marco Del Chiaro, Marc G Besselink","doi":"10.1016/j.hpb.2025.12.001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2025.12.001","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Staging laparoscopy (SL) is performed to detect occult metastases in patients with localized pancreatic cancer. However, current guideline recommendations vary widely on routinely performing SL. This global survey investigated use and indications of SL.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online survey was sent to members of nine international societies and working groups. Information was obtained about SL use, indications SL and adjunct diagnostic modalities across four clinical scenarios.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 617 responding surgeons (76 countries, six continents), 82% used SL which varied between regions (Americas 90%, Asia 85%, Oceania 81%, Europe 76%, Africa 59%; P < 0.050). Most perform SL during the same session as the scheduled laparotomy (63-79%). A SL was mainly performed at the time of upfront surgery (71%), after (60%) or before (37%) neoadjuvant/induction therapy, and before radiotherapy (31%). SL was mainly performed in selected patients, either based on indeterminate/suspicious lesions on cross-sectional imaging (78-87%), resectability status (54-64%), and/or elevated CA19-9 level (60-69%). Most common used adjuncts were cytological lavage (37-55%) and intra-abdominal liver ultrasonography (36-50%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite considerable global variability, SL is widely used to detect occult metastases in pancreatic cancer, mainly in high-risk patients and often during the scheduled laparotomy. The observed variability highlights the need for more evidence leading to stronger guideline recommendations.</p>","PeriodicalId":13229,"journal":{"name":"Hpb","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145800427","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-05DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2025.12.017
B Selvakumar, Shraddha Patkar, Phani K Nekarakanti, Muhammed A Shamim, Shaleen Agarwal, Paleswan J Lakhey, Orlando Jorge M Torres, Mahesh Goel, Vinay K Kapoor
Aims: We conducted this systematic review to answer the questions: a. what are the timing categories for revision surgery (RS) in incidental gallbladder cancer (iGBC)? b. which RS timing achieves better oncological outcomes?
Methods: We performed literature search in 4 databases (PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar and Cochrane Reviews) till 10th October 2025 and included studies which reported patient outcomes based on RS timing. Study characteristics, timing category definitions and RS outcomes were collected. (Study protocol PROSPERO ID CRD42023453990).
Results: Twelve retrospective studies were included, with 2067 iGBC patients (566 males and 1346 females). On the 'Joanna Briggs Institute' (JBI) tool, most studies scored a 'Yes' to 7-8 out of 10 questions. There was no consensus on the definitions of 'early', 'intermediate' and 'delayed' timings for RS. Successful RS, perioperative morbidity, R0 resection were similar. On individual patient data meta-analysis, there was no difference in overall survival between RS at ' = 4 weeks' and '>4 weeks' [hazard ratio: 1.29, 95 % CI: 0.79-2.10].
Conclusion: There was no consensus on the definitions of timing categories and optimum timing for RS in iGBC. Definitions of timing categories need to be standardised and future studies based on these categories may identify the ideal timing of RS in iGBC.
目的:我们进行了这项系统综述,以回答以下问题:a.意外胆囊癌(iGBC)翻修手术(RS)的时机类别是什么?b.哪个RS时间可以获得更好的肿瘤预后?方法:截至2025年10月10日,我们在PubMed、Scopus、谷歌Scholar和Cochrane Reviews 4个数据库中进行文献检索,并纳入了基于RS时间报告患者结局的研究。收集研究特征、时间分类定义和RS结果。(研究协议PROSPERO ID CRD42023453990)。结果:12项回顾性研究纳入了2067例iGBC患者(男性566例,女性1346例)。在“乔安娜布里格斯研究所”(JBI)的工具上,大多数研究在10个问题中得到了7-8分的肯定分。对于RS的“早期”、“中期”和“延迟”时间的定义尚无共识。成功的RS、围手术期发病率、R0切除术相似。在个体患者数据荟萃分析中,RS在“ = 4周”和“>4周”时的总生存率无差异[风险比:1.29,95% CI: 0.79-2.10]。结论:对iGBC患者RS的时间类别和最佳时间的定义尚未达成共识。时间类别的定义需要标准化,未来基于这些类别的研究可能会确定iGBC中RS的理想时间。
{"title":"Timing of revision surgery for incidental gallbladder cancer: a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis.","authors":"B Selvakumar, Shraddha Patkar, Phani K Nekarakanti, Muhammed A Shamim, Shaleen Agarwal, Paleswan J Lakhey, Orlando Jorge M Torres, Mahesh Goel, Vinay K Kapoor","doi":"10.1016/j.hpb.2025.12.017","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2025.12.017","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>We conducted this systematic review to answer the questions: a. what are the timing categories for revision surgery (RS) in incidental gallbladder cancer (iGBC)? b. which RS timing achieves better oncological outcomes?</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed literature search in 4 databases (PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar and Cochrane Reviews) till 10th October 2025 and included studies which reported patient outcomes based on RS timing. Study characteristics, timing category definitions and RS outcomes were collected. (Study protocol PROSPERO ID CRD42023453990).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve retrospective studies were included, with 2067 iGBC patients (566 males and 1346 females). On the 'Joanna Briggs Institute' (JBI) tool, most studies scored a 'Yes' to 7-8 out of 10 questions. There was no consensus on the definitions of 'early', 'intermediate' and 'delayed' timings for RS. Successful RS, perioperative morbidity, R0 resection were similar. On individual patient data meta-analysis, there was no difference in overall survival between RS at '</ = 4 weeks' and '>4 weeks' [hazard ratio: 1.29, 95 % CI: 0.79-2.10].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was no consensus on the definitions of timing categories and optimum timing for RS in iGBC. Definitions of timing categories need to be standardised and future studies based on these categories may identify the ideal timing of RS in iGBC.</p>","PeriodicalId":13229,"journal":{"name":"Hpb","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145819188","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-05DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2025.12.012
Jeska A Fritzsche, Esmée Smit, Cyriel Y Ponsioen, Otto M van Delden, Frederike Dijk, Joris I Erdmann, Paul Fockens, Arantza Fariña Sarasqueta, Geert Kazemier, Heinz-Josef Klümpen, Anne Uyterlinde, Roy L J van Wanrooij, Mattheus C B Wielenga, IJsbrand A J Zijlstra, Joanne Verheij, Rogier P Voermans
Background: Although biliary brush cytology has a high specificity (95-100 %), the sensitivity is poor (41-67 %). This study aimed to evaluate whether the use of an optimized protocol for brush cytology improves the results in patients with suspected perihilar or intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA/iCCA).
Methods: Patients were prospectively included after changing the protocol (June 2021-June 2023) and compared with a historical cohort (January 2017-May 2021). Changes included different brush processing, addition of next-generation sequencing (NGS), and additional sampling (two brush samples and intraductal biopsies). Primary outcome was the sensitivity and the specificity of the procedure.
Results: A total of 175 patients were evaluated (62 prospective, 113 historical) of which 165 patients had malignant disease (94 %). After implementation of the protocol, the sensitivity was 88.3 % (95%CI, 76.8-94.8 %) versus 50.5 % (95%CI, 40.6-60.3 %) prior to implementation. Sensitivity of only the first brush sample with the optimized processing did also significantly increase (78 %; 95%CI, 65.5-87.5 %). Specificity was 100 % in both groups (2/2 vs 8/8).
Conclusions: A modification in the processing of cytopathology led to a significant improvement in the sensitivity of the first bile duct brush to 78 %. Furthermore, adding NGS increased sensitivity to 83 %, an extra brush sample to 85 %, and intraductal biopsies to 88 %.
{"title":"High sensitivity of biliary brush cytology in patients with suspected perihilar or intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a prospective cohort comparison with historical controls.","authors":"Jeska A Fritzsche, Esmée Smit, Cyriel Y Ponsioen, Otto M van Delden, Frederike Dijk, Joris I Erdmann, Paul Fockens, Arantza Fariña Sarasqueta, Geert Kazemier, Heinz-Josef Klümpen, Anne Uyterlinde, Roy L J van Wanrooij, Mattheus C B Wielenga, IJsbrand A J Zijlstra, Joanne Verheij, Rogier P Voermans","doi":"10.1016/j.hpb.2025.12.012","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2025.12.012","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although biliary brush cytology has a high specificity (95-100 %), the sensitivity is poor (41-67 %). This study aimed to evaluate whether the use of an optimized protocol for brush cytology improves the results in patients with suspected perihilar or intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA/iCCA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients were prospectively included after changing the protocol (June 2021-June 2023) and compared with a historical cohort (January 2017-May 2021). Changes included different brush processing, addition of next-generation sequencing (NGS), and additional sampling (two brush samples and intraductal biopsies). Primary outcome was the sensitivity and the specificity of the procedure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 175 patients were evaluated (62 prospective, 113 historical) of which 165 patients had malignant disease (94 %). After implementation of the protocol, the sensitivity was 88.3 % (95%CI, 76.8-94.8 %) versus 50.5 % (95%CI, 40.6-60.3 %) prior to implementation. Sensitivity of only the first brush sample with the optimized processing did also significantly increase (78 %; 95%CI, 65.5-87.5 %). Specificity was 100 % in both groups (2/2 vs 8/8).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A modification in the processing of cytopathology led to a significant improvement in the sensitivity of the first bile duct brush to 78 %. Furthermore, adding NGS increased sensitivity to 83 %, an extra brush sample to 85 %, and intraductal biopsies to 88 %.</p>","PeriodicalId":13229,"journal":{"name":"Hpb","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145959148","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}