Background: The benefits of MIS in older adults are conflicting. This study evaluates demographics and early outcomes, for older patients (≥75) undergoing minimally invasive (MIS) versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD).
Method: We categorized elderly patients who underwent PD from 2017 to 2021 NSQIP databases by surgical approach (open vs MIS). Baseline characteristics were examined with bivariate analysis, and multivariate logistic regression assessed the independent effect of minimally invasive surgery on 30-day serious complications and mortality.
Results: Amongst 4137 patients, 150 (3.63 %) underwent MIS PD. Patients demographics were similar. Open cohorts were older (79.1 vs 78.4 years; p = 0.011) with greater tumor invasion (36.6 % vs. 27.0 %; p = 0.018). MIS had longer operations (133.1 vs 119.6 min; p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that MIS approach was associated with increased serious complications (OR 2.21; p < 0.001), but not mortality (OR 2.11; p = 0.173). Post hoc analysis excluding cases converted to open demonstrated no difference in serious complications (OR 1.94; p = 0.070) or mortality (OR 3.58; p = 0.094). PSM analysis estimated a 14.7 % higher rate of serious complications in MIS but similar mortality (p = 0.291).
Conclusions: MIS PD uptake in elderly patients remains limited, with early findings indicating longer operations and higher complications. Further research on patient selection differences, technique modifications, and center expertise is required.
Introduction: Virtual reality has been shown to be a strong introduction to the robot. However, we hypothesized that a biotissue curriculum including common surgical anastomoses can further enhance robotic technical skills in surgical residents.
Methods: Post-graduate-year three (PGY-3) general surgery residents completed a two-week robotic simulation rotation. The inanimate exercises used biotissue to simulate common robotic anastomoses, including the running hepaticojejunostomy (RHJ), gastrojejunostomy (GJ), interrupted hepaticojejunostomy (IHJ), and pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ). Drills were timed and graded according to modified Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS; range 6-30).
Results: 32 residents completed the curriculum. 81.3% of residents reported prior experience at the surgeon console (median=5 operations). Across all drills the average time to completion decreased from first to fourth attempt (RHJ: 33.7±8.9 vs. 26.3±8.1 min, p<0.001; GJ: 57.2±15.1 vs. 44.6±9.5 min, p<0.001; IHJ: 32.6±7.2 vs. 27.1±7.7 min, p<0.001; PJ: 44.2±9.3 vs. 35.6±10.5 min, p<0.001). Average OSATS score increased across all drills as well (RHJ: 16.0±3.8 vs. 23.3±3.4, p<0.001; GJ: 19.4±2.1 vs. 26.0±2.5, p<0.001; IHJ: 16.9±2.7 vs. 23.2±3.6, p<0.001, PJ: 17.9±2.6 vs. 23.6±3.6, p<0.001).
Conclusion: The robotic biotissue curriculum improves resident performance on robotic anastomoses. With the rise of the robotic platform, training in robotic procedures should be incorporated during surgical residency.
Aims: Severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) remains a lethal condition with a rising incidence worldwide. Recent randomised trials suggest that peritoneal lavage and/or dialysis (PLD), when administered early in SAP, may be beneficial to improve patient outcomes. This study aimed to review this data systematically.
Methods: Studies featuring PLD for the treatment of SAP were searched systematically (2012 Atlanta classification to 2023). A traditional approach to reporting data was augmented by a narrative synthesis.
Results: 210 articles were reviewed, of which six studies featuring 499 patients were included. The technical approach, duration and type of lavage varied in each study and no safety concerns were reported. In patients undergoing PLD, improvements in inflammatory markers and length of stay were seen in all studies. Where reported, fewer invasive procedures for peri-pancreatic fluid collections were required after PLD. Lower mortality was seen in cohorts receiving laparoscopic lavage alone and combined lavage and dialysis when compared with standard treatment. All studies were rated at moderate or high risk of bias.
Conclusions: PLD demonstrates potential as an early therapy to improve outcomes for patients with SAP. Further research is required to define intervention delivery, explore acceptability and investigate efficacy through a powered randomised controlled trial.