首页 > 最新文献

Hpb最新文献

英文 中文
Follow up and safety of use of hepatitis C virus discordant liver transplants. 丙型肝炎病毒异型肝移植术后随访及安全性分析。
IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Hpb
Pub Date : 2025-12-15 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2025.12.027
Catherine G Pratt, Nicolas Noriega, Jenna N Whitrock, Michela M Carter, Allison N Moore, Tiffany E Kaiser, Kristina H Lemon, Keith Luckett, Michael Schoech, Khurram Bari, Ralph C Quillin, Shimul A Shah

Background: Hepatitis C virus (HCV)-discordant liver transplants (LT), nonviremic and viremic, were first shown at our center as safe and efficacious for HCV-negative recipients in the short-term. This review evaluates HCV-discordant LT long-term outcomes.

Methods: All HCV-discordant deceased donor LT from 03/2016-06/2023 were reviewed in this retrospective, single-center study.

Results: 194 HCV-discordant LTs (96 (49.5 %) nucleic acid test (NAT)-negative and 98 (50.5 %) NAT-positive) were evaluated with a median follow-up of 53 months. Baseline liver biopsies of 139 (71.6 %) allografts, report 47 (24.2 %) no fibrosis, 27 (13.9 %) stage 1 fibrosis, and 65 (33.5 %) stage 2 fibrosis. Stage 2 fibrosis was higher among NAT-positive allografts (46.9 % vs. 19.8 %). Seven (6.3 %) NAT-negative allograft recipients experienced HCV transmission. One (1.1 %) NAT-positive allograft recipient experienced early HCV relapse, requiring additional treatment. All treated recipients achieved sustained viral response (SVR). There was no difference in patient or graft survival by allograft NAT status or fibrosis stage.

Conclusion: This is first report to show HCV-discordant LT exhibit low rates of relapse, achieve long-term SVR and have similar patient and graft survival regardless of allograft HCV viremia or fibrosis; thus, justifying their use for transplantation in the long-term.

背景:丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)-非病毒毒肝移植(LT)和病毒毒肝移植(LT)在我们中心首次被证明在短期内对丙型肝炎阴性受体是安全有效的。本综述评估了hcv不一致的LT长期预后。方法:在这项回顾性单中心研究中,对2016年3月至2016年6月期间所有hcv不一致的已故肝移植供者进行回顾性分析。结果:194例hcv -不一致LTs(核酸检测(NAT)阴性96例(49.5%),阳性98例(50.5%)),中位随访53个月。139例(71.6%)同种异体移植物的基线肝活检报告,47例(24.2%)无纤维化,27例(13.9%)1期纤维化,65例(33.5%)2期纤维化。nat阳性同种异体移植物的2期纤维化更高(46.9% vs. 19.8%)。7名(6.3%)nat阴性的同种异体移植受者经历了HCV传播。一名(1.1%)nat阳性的同种异体移植受者经历了早期HCV复发,需要额外的治疗。所有接受治疗的受者均获得了持续的病毒应答(SVR)。同种异体NAT状态或纤维化分期对患者或移植物的生存没有影响。结论:这是第一个报告显示HCV-不一致的LT具有低复发率,实现长期SVR,并且无论异体移植HCV病毒血症或纤维化具有相似的患者和移植物生存;因此,证明它们用于长期移植是合理的。
{"title":"Follow up and safety of use of hepatitis C virus discordant liver transplants.","authors":"Catherine G Pratt, Nicolas Noriega, Jenna N Whitrock, Michela M Carter, Allison N Moore, Tiffany E Kaiser, Kristina H Lemon, Keith Luckett, Michael Schoech, Khurram Bari, Ralph C Quillin, Shimul A Shah","doi":"10.1016/j.hpb.2025.12.027","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2025.12.027","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hepatitis C virus (HCV)-discordant liver transplants (LT), nonviremic and viremic, were first shown at our center as safe and efficacious for HCV-negative recipients in the short-term. This review evaluates HCV-discordant LT long-term outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All HCV-discordant deceased donor LT from 03/2016-06/2023 were reviewed in this retrospective, single-center study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>194 HCV-discordant LTs (96 (49.5 %) nucleic acid test (NAT)-negative and 98 (50.5 %) NAT-positive) were evaluated with a median follow-up of 53 months. Baseline liver biopsies of 139 (71.6 %) allografts, report 47 (24.2 %) no fibrosis, 27 (13.9 %) stage 1 fibrosis, and 65 (33.5 %) stage 2 fibrosis. Stage 2 fibrosis was higher among NAT-positive allografts (46.9 % vs. 19.8 %). Seven (6.3 %) NAT-negative allograft recipients experienced HCV transmission. One (1.1 %) NAT-positive allograft recipient experienced early HCV relapse, requiring additional treatment. All treated recipients achieved sustained viral response (SVR). There was no difference in patient or graft survival by allograft NAT status or fibrosis stage.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This is first report to show HCV-discordant LT exhibit low rates of relapse, achieve long-term SVR and have similar patient and graft survival regardless of allograft HCV viremia or fibrosis; thus, justifying their use for transplantation in the long-term.</p>","PeriodicalId":13229,"journal":{"name":"Hpb","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145900381","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Randomized controlled trial of early versus late cholecystectomy in patients with mild acute pancreatitis. 轻度急性胰腺炎患者早期与晚期胆囊切除术的随机对照试验。
IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Hpb
Pub Date : 2025-12-15 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2025.12.019
Wangxin Zhou, Shengwei Ji, Chunjie Zhang, Baoqing Liu, Hong Hong, Maowei Pei

Background: The optimal timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) in mild acute biliary pancreatitis (MABP) remains debated. This study compared early (within 72 h) versus delayed LC outcomes.

Methods: A randomized trial at Zhejiang Hospital assigned 120 MABP patients to early or delayed LC. Demographics, complications, operative outcomes, and hospital stay were analyzed.

Results: There were no differences in baseline demographics, overall complication rates (10 % vs. 8.3 %; P = 0.752), intraoperative blood loss (33.93 ± 17.68 mL vs. 37.08 ± 30.97 mL; P = 0.593) or conversion to open surgery rate (3.3 % vs. 5.0 %; P = 1.00) between the two groups. There were no recurrent biliary events, postoperative readmissions, reoperations, or deaths in either group; However, the early LC group demonstrated significant advantages in intraoperative adhesions (80 % vs. 93.3 %; P < 0.05), procedure time (61.87 ± 12.54 vs. 66.77 ± 12.11 min, P < 0.05) and the length of hospital stay (5 days vs. 7 days, P < 0.05).

Conclusion: For patients with MABP, early LC performed within 72 h of admission significantly reduces hospital length of stay and procedure time, without increasing perioperative complication rates or measures of procedural difficulty.

背景:轻度急性胆源性胰腺炎(MABP)的腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)的最佳时机仍有争议。本研究比较了早期(72小时内)和延迟LC的结果。方法:浙江医院的一项随机试验将120例MABP患者分配到早期或延迟LC。分析了人口统计学、并发症、手术结果和住院时间。结果:两组患者在基线人口统计学、总并发症发生率(10%对8.3%,P = 0.752)、术中出血量(33.93±17.68 mL对37.08±30.97 mL, P = 0.593)和中转开腹率(3.3%对5.0%,P = 1.00)方面均无差异。两组患者均无胆道事件复发、术后再入院、再手术或死亡;早期LC组在术中粘连(80% vs. 93.3%, P < 0.05)、手术时间(61.87±12.54 vs. 66.77±12.11 min, P < 0.05)、住院时间(5天vs. 7天,P < 0.05)方面均有显著优势。结论:对于MABP患者,在入院后72小时内进行早期LC可显著缩短住院时间和手术时间,且不增加围手术期并发症发生率或手术难度。
{"title":"Randomized controlled trial of early versus late cholecystectomy in patients with mild acute pancreatitis.","authors":"Wangxin Zhou, Shengwei Ji, Chunjie Zhang, Baoqing Liu, Hong Hong, Maowei Pei","doi":"10.1016/j.hpb.2025.12.019","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2025.12.019","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The optimal timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) in mild acute biliary pancreatitis (MABP) remains debated. This study compared early (within 72 h) versus delayed LC outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A randomized trial at Zhejiang Hospital assigned 120 MABP patients to early or delayed LC. Demographics, complications, operative outcomes, and hospital stay were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no differences in baseline demographics, overall complication rates (10 % vs. 8.3 %; P = 0.752), intraoperative blood loss (33.93 ± 17.68 mL vs. 37.08 ± 30.97 mL; P = 0.593) or conversion to open surgery rate (3.3 % vs. 5.0 %; P = 1.00) between the two groups. There were no recurrent biliary events, postoperative readmissions, reoperations, or deaths in either group; However, the early LC group demonstrated significant advantages in intraoperative adhesions (80 % vs. 93.3 %; P < 0.05), procedure time (61.87 ± 12.54 vs. 66.77 ± 12.11 min, P < 0.05) and the length of hospital stay (5 days vs. 7 days, P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For patients with MABP, early LC performed within 72 h of admission significantly reduces hospital length of stay and procedure time, without increasing perioperative complication rates or measures of procedural difficulty.</p>","PeriodicalId":13229,"journal":{"name":"Hpb","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145889158","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Machine learning model for recurrence-free survival in solitary resectable colorectal liver metastasis. 孤立性可切除结直肠癌肝转移无复发生存的机器学习模型。
IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Hpb
Pub Date : 2025-12-15 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2025.12.024
Mingshuai Wang, Jianli Duan, Hongwei Wang, Yuhong Li, Baocai Xing

Background: Solitary colorectal liver metastasis (SCRLM) exhibits substantial heterogeneity in recurrence patterns after hepatic resection, yet individualized prediction tools for recurrence-free survival (RFS) are lacking.

Methods: In this multicenter retrospective study, 698 SCRLM patients undergoing hepatic resection were analyzed (training cohort: n=574; validation cohort: n=124). RFS was the primary endpoint. Three predictive models-random survival forest (RSF), Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM), and eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost)-were developed and compared. Model performance was assessed via concordance index (C-index), time-dependent area under the ROC curve (AUROC), and calibration plots.

Results: The XGBoost model achieved the best performance, with AUROCs of 0.93 and 0.87 at 1 year, and 0.89 and 0.86 at 3 years, in the training and validation cohorts, respectively. Compared with the modified Clinical Score (m-CS), the model demonstrated significantly higher discrimination at 1, 2, and 3 years (all P < 0.001), and also identified a subgroup of patients more likely to benefit from postoperative chemotherapy. A user-friendly online tool was developed for clinical application: https://scrlm.shinyapps.io/scrlmapp/.

Conclusion: We developed and validated a machine learning-based model for SCRLM, enabling individualized recurrence risk prediction and guiding postoperative chemotherapy decisions. This approach may improve outcomes while reducing overtreatment.

背景:孤立性结直肠癌肝转移(SCRLM)在肝切除术后的复发模式中表现出实质性的异质性,但缺乏个体化的无复发生存(RFS)预测工具。方法:在这项多中心回顾性研究中,对698例行肝切除术的SCRLM患者进行了分析(训练组:n=574;验证组:n=124)。RFS是主要终点。建立了随机生存森林(RSF)、梯度增强机(GBM)和极端梯度增强(XGBoost)三种预测模型并进行了比较。通过一致性指数(C-index)、ROC曲线下随时间变化的面积(AUROC)和校准图来评估模型的性能。结果:XGBoost模型在训练组和验证组中表现最佳,1年时auroc分别为0.93和0.87,3年时auroc分别为0.89和0.86。与改良的临床评分(m-CS)相比,该模型在1年、2年和3年表现出明显更高的鉴别(均P < 0.001),并且还确定了一个更有可能从术后化疗中获益的亚组患者。我们开发了一个用户友好的在线工具用于临床应用:https://scrlm.shinyapps.io/scrlmapp/.Conclusion:我们开发并验证了一个基于机器学习的SCRLM模型,能够个性化复发风险预测并指导术后化疗决策。这种方法可以改善结果,同时减少过度治疗。
{"title":"Machine learning model for recurrence-free survival in solitary resectable colorectal liver metastasis.","authors":"Mingshuai Wang, Jianli Duan, Hongwei Wang, Yuhong Li, Baocai Xing","doi":"10.1016/j.hpb.2025.12.024","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2025.12.024","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Solitary colorectal liver metastasis (SCRLM) exhibits substantial heterogeneity in recurrence patterns after hepatic resection, yet individualized prediction tools for recurrence-free survival (RFS) are lacking.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this multicenter retrospective study, 698 SCRLM patients undergoing hepatic resection were analyzed (training cohort: n=574; validation cohort: n=124). RFS was the primary endpoint. Three predictive models-random survival forest (RSF), Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM), and eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost)-were developed and compared. Model performance was assessed via concordance index (C-index), time-dependent area under the ROC curve (AUROC), and calibration plots.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The XGBoost model achieved the best performance, with AUROCs of 0.93 and 0.87 at 1 year, and 0.89 and 0.86 at 3 years, in the training and validation cohorts, respectively. Compared with the modified Clinical Score (m-CS), the model demonstrated significantly higher discrimination at 1, 2, and 3 years (all P < 0.001), and also identified a subgroup of patients more likely to benefit from postoperative chemotherapy. A user-friendly online tool was developed for clinical application: https://scrlm.shinyapps.io/scrlmapp/.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We developed and validated a machine learning-based model for SCRLM, enabling individualized recurrence risk prediction and guiding postoperative chemotherapy decisions. This approach may improve outcomes while reducing overtreatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":13229,"journal":{"name":"Hpb","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145910628","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A systematic review of the application of indocyanine green in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: Technical details, surgical indications, and outcomes. 系统回顾吲哚菁绿在胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤中的应用:技术细节、手术指征和结果。
IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Hpb
Pub Date : 2025-12-13 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2025.12.022
Marco Palucci, Gabriela D Angel-Millán, Fabio Giannone, Mariantonietta Alagia, Celeste Del Basso, Marco Lodin, Igor Monsellato, Federico Sangiuolo, Gianluca Cassese, Fabrizio Panaro

Background: Intraoperative localization of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) is challenging, particularly for small lesions during minimally invasive surgery due to the lack of tactile feedback. Indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence imaging is a promising technique to enhance tumor visualization and surgical guidance. This systematic review evaluates current evidence on ICG use in pNET surgery, focusing on indications, timing, dosage, and intraoperative strategies.

Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science was conducted up to May 2025, following PRISMA guidelines. Included studies reported intraoperative ICG use in pNET surgery. Preclinical studies, non-English articles, and those lacking data on ICG protocol or dosage were excluded.

Results: Fifteen studies involving 43 patients were included. Diagnoses were insulinoma (39.5 %), unspecified pNETs (58.2 %), and one case of neuroendocrine hyperplasia. ICG identified tumors in 88.4 % of cases, with a positive predictive value of 95.0 %. ICG was mostly administered intravenously after pancreatic exposure, with doses ranging from 1 to 25 mg. Fluorescence appeared within 5 min and was homogeneous in 97.4 % of cases. No adverse events were reported.

Discussion: ICG fluorescence is a safe and effective tool for localizing pNETs. Further studies are needed to standardize protocols and optimize clinical use.

背景:胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤(pNETs)的术中定位具有挑战性,特别是微创手术中由于缺乏触觉反馈的小病变。吲哚菁绿(ICG)荧光成像是一种很有前途的技术,可以增强肿瘤的可视化和手术指导。本系统综述评估了目前在pNET手术中使用ICG的证据,重点是指征、时机、剂量和术中策略。方法:系统检索PubMed, Embase和Web of Science,直到2025年5月,遵循PRISMA指南。纳入的研究报告了术中ICG在pNET手术中的应用。排除了临床前研究、非英文文章以及缺乏ICG方案或剂量数据的研究。结果:纳入15项研究,共43例患者。诊断为胰岛素瘤(39.5%),不明pNETs(58.2%), 1例神经内分泌增生。ICG对肿瘤的鉴别率为88.4%,阳性预测值为95.0%。ICG主要在胰腺暴露后静脉注射,剂量范围为1至25毫克。荧光在5分钟内出现,97.4%的病例荧光均匀。无不良事件报告。讨论:ICG荧光是一种安全有效的pNETs定位工具。需要进一步的研究来规范方案和优化临床应用。
{"title":"A systematic review of the application of indocyanine green in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: Technical details, surgical indications, and outcomes.","authors":"Marco Palucci, Gabriela D Angel-Millán, Fabio Giannone, Mariantonietta Alagia, Celeste Del Basso, Marco Lodin, Igor Monsellato, Federico Sangiuolo, Gianluca Cassese, Fabrizio Panaro","doi":"10.1016/j.hpb.2025.12.022","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2025.12.022","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intraoperative localization of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) is challenging, particularly for small lesions during minimally invasive surgery due to the lack of tactile feedback. Indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence imaging is a promising technique to enhance tumor visualization and surgical guidance. This systematic review evaluates current evidence on ICG use in pNET surgery, focusing on indications, timing, dosage, and intraoperative strategies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science was conducted up to May 2025, following PRISMA guidelines. Included studies reported intraoperative ICG use in pNET surgery. Preclinical studies, non-English articles, and those lacking data on ICG protocol or dosage were excluded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen studies involving 43 patients were included. Diagnoses were insulinoma (39.5 %), unspecified pNETs (58.2 %), and one case of neuroendocrine hyperplasia. ICG identified tumors in 88.4 % of cases, with a positive predictive value of 95.0 %. ICG was mostly administered intravenously after pancreatic exposure, with doses ranging from 1 to 25 mg. Fluorescence appeared within 5 min and was homogeneous in 97.4 % of cases. No adverse events were reported.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>ICG fluorescence is a safe and effective tool for localizing pNETs. Further studies are needed to standardize protocols and optimize clinical use.</p>","PeriodicalId":13229,"journal":{"name":"Hpb","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145862959","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Correspondence: "Impact of post-hepatectomy liver failure on recurrence following major hepatectomy for colorectal cancer liver metastases". 对应:“肝切除术后肝衰竭对大肠癌肝转移术后复发的影响”。
IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Hpb
Pub Date : 2025-12-13 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2025.12.020
Ahmad Mahamid
{"title":"Correspondence: \"Impact of post-hepatectomy liver failure on recurrence following major hepatectomy for colorectal cancer liver metastases\".","authors":"Ahmad Mahamid","doi":"10.1016/j.hpb.2025.12.020","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2025.12.020","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":13229,"journal":{"name":"Hpb","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145878222","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Epidemiology and treatment outcomes of gallbladder cancer in Finland - a nationwide study. 芬兰胆囊癌的流行病学和治疗结果——一项全国性研究。
IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Hpb
Pub Date : 2025-12-08 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2025.12.016
Sini Takala, Hanna Koppatz, Arno Nordin, Ville Sallinen

Background: Few population-based studies exist for gallbladder cancer (GBC). This study explored incidence, diagnostics, treatment, and survival of patients with GBC in a national cohort.

Methods: Patients with GBC during 2006-2019 in Finland were included from Finnish Cancer Registry with manual patient data verification.

Results: GBC was diagnosed in 1183 patients. Overall incidence was 1.56:100,000 and it decreased over time (from 1.81 to 1.35, p < 0.001). For detailed analysis, 1016 patients were included. The proportion of patients with T2-T3 increased (from 46 % to 65 %; p < 0.001) and T4 decreased (from 35 % to 18 %; p < 0.001). Similarly, the proportion of patients with stage IVA decreased (from 10 % to 4 %, p = 0.002) and stage II increased (from 12 % to 20 %, p = 0.006). In total, 185 (18 %) patients underwent curative-intent surgery with a 92 % R0 resection rate. The proportion of curative-intent surgery increased (from 15 % to 23 %, p = 0.013), as well as use of adjuvant (from 19 % to 54 %, p < 0.001) and systemic chemotherapy (from 31.4 % to 42.1 %, p = 0.014). Median overall survival was 7 months and 5-year overall survival 14 %, which improved during the study period (from 12 % to 14 %, p = 0.007).

Conclusion: The incidence of GBC decreased, and overall survival improved, likely due to increased surgical and oncological treatments.

背景:胆囊癌(GBC)基于人群的研究很少。本研究在全国队列中探讨了GBC患者的发病率、诊断、治疗和生存率。方法:通过手工患者数据验证,从芬兰癌症登记处纳入2006-2019年芬兰GBC患者。结果:1183例患者诊断为GBC。总发病率为1.56:10万,随着时间的推移而降低(从1.81降至1.35,p < 0.001)。详细分析纳入1016例患者。T2-T3患者比例增加(从46%增加到65%,p < 0.001), T4患者比例减少(从35%减少到18%,p < 0.001)。同样,IVA期患者比例下降(从10%降至4%,p = 0.002), II期患者比例上升(从12%降至20%,p = 0.006)。总共有185例(18%)患者接受了旨在治愈的手术,R0切除率为92%。治疗目的手术的比例增加(从15%增加到23%,p = 0.013),辅助治疗的使用(从19%增加到54%,p < 0.001)和全身化疗(从31.4%增加到42.1%,p = 0.014)。中位总生存期为7个月,5年总生存期为14%,在研究期间有所改善(从12%提高到14%,p = 0.007)。结论:GBC发病率下降,总生存率提高,可能是由于手术和肿瘤治疗的增加。
{"title":"Epidemiology and treatment outcomes of gallbladder cancer in Finland - a nationwide study.","authors":"Sini Takala, Hanna Koppatz, Arno Nordin, Ville Sallinen","doi":"10.1016/j.hpb.2025.12.016","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2025.12.016","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Few population-based studies exist for gallbladder cancer (GBC). This study explored incidence, diagnostics, treatment, and survival of patients with GBC in a national cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with GBC during 2006-2019 in Finland were included from Finnish Cancer Registry with manual patient data verification.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>GBC was diagnosed in 1183 patients. Overall incidence was 1.56:100,000 and it decreased over time (from 1.81 to 1.35, p < 0.001). For detailed analysis, 1016 patients were included. The proportion of patients with T2-T3 increased (from 46 % to 65 %; p < 0.001) and T4 decreased (from 35 % to 18 %; p < 0.001). Similarly, the proportion of patients with stage IVA decreased (from 10 % to 4 %, p = 0.002) and stage II increased (from 12 % to 20 %, p = 0.006). In total, 185 (18 %) patients underwent curative-intent surgery with a 92 % R0 resection rate. The proportion of curative-intent surgery increased (from 15 % to 23 %, p = 0.013), as well as use of adjuvant (from 19 % to 54 %, p < 0.001) and systemic chemotherapy (from 31.4 % to 42.1 %, p = 0.014). Median overall survival was 7 months and 5-year overall survival 14 %, which improved during the study period (from 12 % to 14 %, p = 0.007).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The incidence of GBC decreased, and overall survival improved, likely due to increased surgical and oncological treatments.</p>","PeriodicalId":13229,"journal":{"name":"Hpb","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145827650","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Quality of life in patients with gallbladder polyps: a multicentre prospective cohort study. 胆囊息肉患者的生活质量:一项多中心前瞻性队列研究
IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Hpb
Pub Date : 2025-12-06 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2025.12.008
Sander R W J Martens, Mike van Dooren, Jarmila van der Bilt, Marieke T de Boer, Djamila Boerma, Philip Bos, Andries E Braat, Steve M M de Castro, Bartholomeus J G A Corten, Freek Daams, Joris I Erdmann, Floris Ferenschild, Ansje S Fortuin, Anna van Geloven, Erik van der Hoeven, Rutger Klicks, Flip M Kruyt, Barbara S Langenhoff, Mike S L Liem, Philip V M Linsen, Misha Luyer, Vincent B Nieuwenhuijs, Pim Olthof, Peter W Plaisier, Charles van Rossem, Ruud Schrauwen, Jennifer Schreinemakers, Gian P Serafino, Ernst J Spillenaar Bilgen, Koen Talsma, Merel M Tielemans, Charlotte J Tutein Nolthenius, Elise A J de Savornin Lohman, Philip R de Reuver

Background: Patients with gallbladder polyps (GPs) are frequently subject to surveillance or cholecystectomy due to a risk of malignancy. As most GPs prove to be benign, potential overtreatment may impact quality of life (QoL). This study aimed to evaluate QoL in patients with GPs, compare it to the general population, and identify factors associated with QoL.

Methods: Patients diagnosed with GPs were included from 26 Dutch centres from 2018 to 2020, and followed until 2024. QoL was assessed at multiple time points using generic (EQ-5D) and disease-specific (GIQLI) instruments. Demographics, imaging, and surgical data were analysed.

Results: Among 207 patients, 42 (20.3 %) underwent cholecystectomy; neoplastic polyps were found in 3 (1.4 %). Overall, baseline EQ-5D scores were similar to the general population (0.85 vs 0.87; p = 0.20), while GIQLI scores were lower (116.1 vs 122.6; p < 0.001). Anxiety was reported by 39 % and was the strongest predictor of reduced QoL (EQ-5D: β = -0.095; GIQLI: β = -15.49; p < 0.001). QoL was not associated with GP characteristics.

Conclusion: GPs are associated with reduced QoL, driven predominantly by anxiety. Structured counselling on low malignancy risk and less intensive surveillance may alleviate anxiety and reduce overtreatment.

背景:胆囊息肉(GPs)患者由于有恶性肿瘤的风险,经常接受监测或胆囊切除术。由于大多数全科医生被证明是良性的,潜在的过度治疗可能影响生活质量(QoL)。本研究旨在评估全科医生患者的生活质量,将其与普通人群进行比较,并确定与生活质量相关的因素。方法:从2018年至2020年,从26个荷兰中心纳入诊断为全科医生的患者,并随访至2024年。使用通用(EQ-5D)和疾病特异性(GIQLI)仪器在多个时间点评估生活质量。对人口统计学、影像学和手术资料进行分析。结果:207例患者中,42例(20.3%)行胆囊切除术;3例(1.4%)发现肿瘤性息肉。总体而言,基线EQ-5D评分与一般人群相似(0.85 vs 0.87; p = 0.20),而GIQLI评分较低(116.1 vs 122.6; p < 0.001)。39%的人报告焦虑,并且是生活质量降低的最强预测因子(EQ-5D: β = -0.095; GIQLI: β = -15.49; p < 0.001)。生活质量与GP特征无关。结论:全科医生与生活质量下降有关,主要由焦虑引起。低恶性肿瘤风险的结构化咨询和不那么密集的监测可以减轻焦虑和减少过度治疗。
{"title":"Quality of life in patients with gallbladder polyps: a multicentre prospective cohort study.","authors":"Sander R W J Martens, Mike van Dooren, Jarmila van der Bilt, Marieke T de Boer, Djamila Boerma, Philip Bos, Andries E Braat, Steve M M de Castro, Bartholomeus J G A Corten, Freek Daams, Joris I Erdmann, Floris Ferenschild, Ansje S Fortuin, Anna van Geloven, Erik van der Hoeven, Rutger Klicks, Flip M Kruyt, Barbara S Langenhoff, Mike S L Liem, Philip V M Linsen, Misha Luyer, Vincent B Nieuwenhuijs, Pim Olthof, Peter W Plaisier, Charles van Rossem, Ruud Schrauwen, Jennifer Schreinemakers, Gian P Serafino, Ernst J Spillenaar Bilgen, Koen Talsma, Merel M Tielemans, Charlotte J Tutein Nolthenius, Elise A J de Savornin Lohman, Philip R de Reuver","doi":"10.1016/j.hpb.2025.12.008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2025.12.008","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with gallbladder polyps (GPs) are frequently subject to surveillance or cholecystectomy due to a risk of malignancy. As most GPs prove to be benign, potential overtreatment may impact quality of life (QoL). This study aimed to evaluate QoL in patients with GPs, compare it to the general population, and identify factors associated with QoL.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients diagnosed with GPs were included from 26 Dutch centres from 2018 to 2020, and followed until 2024. QoL was assessed at multiple time points using generic (EQ-5D) and disease-specific (GIQLI) instruments. Demographics, imaging, and surgical data were analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 207 patients, 42 (20.3 %) underwent cholecystectomy; neoplastic polyps were found in 3 (1.4 %). Overall, baseline EQ-5D scores were similar to the general population (0.85 vs 0.87; p = 0.20), while GIQLI scores were lower (116.1 vs 122.6; p < 0.001). Anxiety was reported by 39 % and was the strongest predictor of reduced QoL (EQ-5D: β = -0.095; GIQLI: β = -15.49; p < 0.001). QoL was not associated with GP characteristics.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>GPs are associated with reduced QoL, driven predominantly by anxiety. Structured counselling on low malignancy risk and less intensive surveillance may alleviate anxiety and reduce overtreatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":13229,"journal":{"name":"Hpb","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145800498","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Staging laparoscopy to detect occult metastases in localized pancreatic cancer: global survey among nine international societies. 腹腔镜分期检测胰腺癌隐匿性转移:9个国际学会的全球调查。
IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Hpb
Pub Date : 2025-12-06 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2025.12.001
Thomas F Stoop, Kishan R D Lutchman, Rutger T Theijse, Patrik Larsson, Atsushi Oba, Bas Groot Koerkamp, Casper H J van Eijck, Christopher L Wolfgang, Elena Rangelova, Giovanni Marchegiani, Itaru Endo, Jin-Young Jang, John M Primrose, Jose M Ramia, Matthew H G Katz, Mohammed Abu Hilal, Poya Ghorbani, Shailesh V Shrikhande, Thilo Hackert, William H Nealon, Mark J Truty, Marco Del Chiaro, Marc G Besselink

Background: Staging laparoscopy (SL) is performed to detect occult metastases in patients with localized pancreatic cancer. However, current guideline recommendations vary widely on routinely performing SL. This global survey investigated use and indications of SL.

Methods: An online survey was sent to members of nine international societies and working groups. Information was obtained about SL use, indications SL and adjunct diagnostic modalities across four clinical scenarios.

Results: Among 617 responding surgeons (76 countries, six continents), 82% used SL which varied between regions (Americas 90%, Asia 85%, Oceania 81%, Europe 76%, Africa 59%; P < 0.050). Most perform SL during the same session as the scheduled laparotomy (63-79%). A SL was mainly performed at the time of upfront surgery (71%), after (60%) or before (37%) neoadjuvant/induction therapy, and before radiotherapy (31%). SL was mainly performed in selected patients, either based on indeterminate/suspicious lesions on cross-sectional imaging (78-87%), resectability status (54-64%), and/or elevated CA19-9 level (60-69%). Most common used adjuncts were cytological lavage (37-55%) and intra-abdominal liver ultrasonography (36-50%).

Conclusion: Despite considerable global variability, SL is widely used to detect occult metastases in pancreatic cancer, mainly in high-risk patients and often during the scheduled laparotomy. The observed variability highlights the need for more evidence leading to stronger guideline recommendations.

背景:分期腹腔镜(SL)用于发现局限性胰腺癌患者的隐匿性转移。然而,目前的指南建议在常规使用SL方面差异很大。这项全球调查调查了SL的使用和适应症。方法:向9个国际学会和工作组的成员发送了一份在线调查。在四种临床情况下获得关于SL使用、适应症SL和辅助诊断方式的信息。结果:617名受访外科医生(来自6大洲76个国家)中,82%使用SL,各地区差异较大(美洲90%,亚洲85%,大洋洲81%,欧洲76%,非洲59%,P < 0.050)。大多数在预定剖腹手术的同一阶段执行SL(63-79%)。SL主要在术前(71%)、新辅助/诱导治疗后(60%)或前(37%)和放疗前(31%)进行。SL主要在选择性的患者中进行,根据横断面成像不确定/可疑病变(78-87%),可切除状态(54-64%)和/或CA19-9水平升高(60-69%)。最常用的辅助手段是细胞学灌洗(37-55%)和腹腔内肝脏超声检查(36-50%)。结论:尽管存在很大的全球差异,但SL被广泛用于检测胰腺癌的隐匿性转移,主要是在高危患者中,并且经常在计划的剖腹手术中。观察到的可变性强调需要更多的证据来形成更强有力的指南建议。
{"title":"Staging laparoscopy to detect occult metastases in localized pancreatic cancer: global survey among nine international societies.","authors":"Thomas F Stoop, Kishan R D Lutchman, Rutger T Theijse, Patrik Larsson, Atsushi Oba, Bas Groot Koerkamp, Casper H J van Eijck, Christopher L Wolfgang, Elena Rangelova, Giovanni Marchegiani, Itaru Endo, Jin-Young Jang, John M Primrose, Jose M Ramia, Matthew H G Katz, Mohammed Abu Hilal, Poya Ghorbani, Shailesh V Shrikhande, Thilo Hackert, William H Nealon, Mark J Truty, Marco Del Chiaro, Marc G Besselink","doi":"10.1016/j.hpb.2025.12.001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2025.12.001","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Staging laparoscopy (SL) is performed to detect occult metastases in patients with localized pancreatic cancer. However, current guideline recommendations vary widely on routinely performing SL. This global survey investigated use and indications of SL.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online survey was sent to members of nine international societies and working groups. Information was obtained about SL use, indications SL and adjunct diagnostic modalities across four clinical scenarios.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 617 responding surgeons (76 countries, six continents), 82% used SL which varied between regions (Americas 90%, Asia 85%, Oceania 81%, Europe 76%, Africa 59%; P < 0.050). Most perform SL during the same session as the scheduled laparotomy (63-79%). A SL was mainly performed at the time of upfront surgery (71%), after (60%) or before (37%) neoadjuvant/induction therapy, and before radiotherapy (31%). SL was mainly performed in selected patients, either based on indeterminate/suspicious lesions on cross-sectional imaging (78-87%), resectability status (54-64%), and/or elevated CA19-9 level (60-69%). Most common used adjuncts were cytological lavage (37-55%) and intra-abdominal liver ultrasonography (36-50%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite considerable global variability, SL is widely used to detect occult metastases in pancreatic cancer, mainly in high-risk patients and often during the scheduled laparotomy. The observed variability highlights the need for more evidence leading to stronger guideline recommendations.</p>","PeriodicalId":13229,"journal":{"name":"Hpb","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145800427","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Timing of revision surgery for incidental gallbladder cancer: a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis. 偶发性胆囊癌翻修手术的时机:一项系统综述和个体患者数据荟萃分析。
IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Hpb
Pub Date : 2025-12-05 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2025.12.017
B Selvakumar, Shraddha Patkar, Phani K Nekarakanti, Muhammed A Shamim, Shaleen Agarwal, Paleswan J Lakhey, Orlando Jorge M Torres, Mahesh Goel, Vinay K Kapoor

Aims: We conducted this systematic review to answer the questions: a. what are the timing categories for revision surgery (RS) in incidental gallbladder cancer (iGBC)? b. which RS timing achieves better oncological outcomes?

Methods: We performed literature search in 4 databases (PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar and Cochrane Reviews) till 10th October 2025 and included studies which reported patient outcomes based on RS timing. Study characteristics, timing category definitions and RS outcomes were collected. (Study protocol PROSPERO ID CRD42023453990).

Results: Twelve retrospective studies were included, with 2067 iGBC patients (566 males and 1346 females). On the 'Joanna Briggs Institute' (JBI) tool, most studies scored a 'Yes' to 7-8 out of 10 questions. There was no consensus on the definitions of 'early', 'intermediate' and 'delayed' timings for RS. Successful RS, perioperative morbidity, R0 resection were similar. On individual patient data meta-analysis, there was no difference in overall survival between RS at '4 weeks' [hazard ratio: 1.29, 95 % CI: 0.79-2.10].

Conclusion: There was no consensus on the definitions of timing categories and optimum timing for RS in iGBC. Definitions of timing categories need to be standardised and future studies based on these categories may identify the ideal timing of RS in iGBC.

目的:我们进行了这项系统综述,以回答以下问题:a.意外胆囊癌(iGBC)翻修手术(RS)的时机类别是什么?b.哪个RS时间可以获得更好的肿瘤预后?方法:截至2025年10月10日,我们在PubMed、Scopus、谷歌Scholar和Cochrane Reviews 4个数据库中进行文献检索,并纳入了基于RS时间报告患者结局的研究。收集研究特征、时间分类定义和RS结果。(研究协议PROSPERO ID CRD42023453990)。结果:12项回顾性研究纳入了2067例iGBC患者(男性566例,女性1346例)。在“乔安娜布里格斯研究所”(JBI)的工具上,大多数研究在10个问题中得到了7-8分的肯定分。对于RS的“早期”、“中期”和“延迟”时间的定义尚无共识。成功的RS、围手术期发病率、R0切除术相似。在个体患者数据荟萃分析中,RS在“4周”时的总生存率无差异[风险比:1.29,95% CI: 0.79-2.10]。结论:对iGBC患者RS的时间类别和最佳时间的定义尚未达成共识。时间类别的定义需要标准化,未来基于这些类别的研究可能会确定iGBC中RS的理想时间。
{"title":"Timing of revision surgery for incidental gallbladder cancer: a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis.","authors":"B Selvakumar, Shraddha Patkar, Phani K Nekarakanti, Muhammed A Shamim, Shaleen Agarwal, Paleswan J Lakhey, Orlando Jorge M Torres, Mahesh Goel, Vinay K Kapoor","doi":"10.1016/j.hpb.2025.12.017","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2025.12.017","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>We conducted this systematic review to answer the questions: a. what are the timing categories for revision surgery (RS) in incidental gallbladder cancer (iGBC)? b. which RS timing achieves better oncological outcomes?</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed literature search in 4 databases (PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar and Cochrane Reviews) till 10th October 2025 and included studies which reported patient outcomes based on RS timing. Study characteristics, timing category definitions and RS outcomes were collected. (Study protocol PROSPERO ID CRD42023453990).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve retrospective studies were included, with 2067 iGBC patients (566 males and 1346 females). On the 'Joanna Briggs Institute' (JBI) tool, most studies scored a 'Yes' to 7-8 out of 10 questions. There was no consensus on the definitions of 'early', 'intermediate' and 'delayed' timings for RS. Successful RS, perioperative morbidity, R0 resection were similar. On individual patient data meta-analysis, there was no difference in overall survival between RS at '</ = 4 weeks' and '>4 weeks' [hazard ratio: 1.29, 95 % CI: 0.79-2.10].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was no consensus on the definitions of timing categories and optimum timing for RS in iGBC. Definitions of timing categories need to be standardised and future studies based on these categories may identify the ideal timing of RS in iGBC.</p>","PeriodicalId":13229,"journal":{"name":"Hpb","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145819188","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
High sensitivity of biliary brush cytology in patients with suspected perihilar or intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a prospective cohort comparison with historical controls. 胆道刷细胞学在疑似肝门周围或肝内胆管癌患者中的高敏感性:与历史对照的前瞻性队列比较
IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Hpb
Pub Date : 2025-12-05 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2025.12.012
Jeska A Fritzsche, Esmée Smit, Cyriel Y Ponsioen, Otto M van Delden, Frederike Dijk, Joris I Erdmann, Paul Fockens, Arantza Fariña Sarasqueta, Geert Kazemier, Heinz-Josef Klümpen, Anne Uyterlinde, Roy L J van Wanrooij, Mattheus C B Wielenga, IJsbrand A J Zijlstra, Joanne Verheij, Rogier P Voermans

Background: Although biliary brush cytology has a high specificity (95-100 %), the sensitivity is poor (41-67 %). This study aimed to evaluate whether the use of an optimized protocol for brush cytology improves the results in patients with suspected perihilar or intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA/iCCA).

Methods: Patients were prospectively included after changing the protocol (June 2021-June 2023) and compared with a historical cohort (January 2017-May 2021). Changes included different brush processing, addition of next-generation sequencing (NGS), and additional sampling (two brush samples and intraductal biopsies). Primary outcome was the sensitivity and the specificity of the procedure.

Results: A total of 175 patients were evaluated (62 prospective, 113 historical) of which 165 patients had malignant disease (94 %). After implementation of the protocol, the sensitivity was 88.3 % (95%CI, 76.8-94.8 %) versus 50.5 % (95%CI, 40.6-60.3 %) prior to implementation. Sensitivity of only the first brush sample with the optimized processing did also significantly increase (78 %; 95%CI, 65.5-87.5 %). Specificity was 100 % in both groups (2/2 vs 8/8).

Conclusions: A modification in the processing of cytopathology led to a significant improvement in the sensitivity of the first bile duct brush to 78 %. Furthermore, adding NGS increased sensitivity to 83 %, an extra brush sample to 85 %, and intraductal biopsies to 88 %.

背景:胆道刷细胞学检查虽然特异性高(95- 100%),但敏感性较差(41- 67%)。本研究旨在评估使用优化的刷细胞学检查方案是否能改善疑似肝门周围或肝内胆管癌(pCCA/iCCA)患者的结果。方法:在改变方案(2021年6月- 2023年6月)后前瞻性纳入患者,并与历史队列(2017年1月- 2021年5月)进行比较。变化包括不同的刷处理,增加下一代测序(NGS)和额外的采样(两个刷样本和导管内活检)。主要结局是手术的敏感性和特异性。结果:共评估175例患者(62例前瞻性,113例既往),其中165例为恶性疾病(94%)。方案实施后,敏感性为88.3% (95%CI, 768 - 94.8%),而实施前为50.5% (95%CI, 40.6- 60.3%)。经过优化处理的第一个毛刷样品的灵敏度也显著提高(78%;95%CI, 65.5- 87.5%)。两组特异性均为100% (2/2 vs 8/8)。结论:细胞病理学处理的修改导致第一胆管刷的敏感性显着提高到78%。此外,添加NGS将敏感性提高到83%,额外的刷子样本提高到85%,导管内活检提高到88%。
{"title":"High sensitivity of biliary brush cytology in patients with suspected perihilar or intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a prospective cohort comparison with historical controls.","authors":"Jeska A Fritzsche, Esmée Smit, Cyriel Y Ponsioen, Otto M van Delden, Frederike Dijk, Joris I Erdmann, Paul Fockens, Arantza Fariña Sarasqueta, Geert Kazemier, Heinz-Josef Klümpen, Anne Uyterlinde, Roy L J van Wanrooij, Mattheus C B Wielenga, IJsbrand A J Zijlstra, Joanne Verheij, Rogier P Voermans","doi":"10.1016/j.hpb.2025.12.012","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2025.12.012","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although biliary brush cytology has a high specificity (95-100 %), the sensitivity is poor (41-67 %). This study aimed to evaluate whether the use of an optimized protocol for brush cytology improves the results in patients with suspected perihilar or intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA/iCCA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients were prospectively included after changing the protocol (June 2021-June 2023) and compared with a historical cohort (January 2017-May 2021). Changes included different brush processing, addition of next-generation sequencing (NGS), and additional sampling (two brush samples and intraductal biopsies). Primary outcome was the sensitivity and the specificity of the procedure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 175 patients were evaluated (62 prospective, 113 historical) of which 165 patients had malignant disease (94 %). After implementation of the protocol, the sensitivity was 88.3 % (95%CI, 76.8-94.8 %) versus 50.5 % (95%CI, 40.6-60.3 %) prior to implementation. Sensitivity of only the first brush sample with the optimized processing did also significantly increase (78 %; 95%CI, 65.5-87.5 %). Specificity was 100 % in both groups (2/2 vs 8/8).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A modification in the processing of cytopathology led to a significant improvement in the sensitivity of the first bile duct brush to 78 %. Furthermore, adding NGS increased sensitivity to 83 %, an extra brush sample to 85 %, and intraductal biopsies to 88 %.</p>","PeriodicalId":13229,"journal":{"name":"Hpb","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145959148","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Hpb
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1