Pub Date : 2025-12-17DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2025.12.025
Carlos Manterola, Josue Rivadeneira, Luis Alvarado, Luis Grande
Background: Postoperative complications (POC) in surgery for hepatic cystic echinococcosis (HCE) still being frequent. Comorbidities as a risk factor has not yet been studied. The aim of this study was to evaluate the predictive value of CCI for POC in surgically treated HCE patients.
Methods: Nested case-control study. Patients undergoing elective surgery for HCE between 2011 and 2019; matched (1:1) by sex, cyst diameter and time follow-up were included. Cases were patients with CCI≥3; and controls, patients with CCI≤2. Primary outcome was POC. Descriptive statistics and bivariate analyses were applied. Logistic regression was used, odds ratios (OR) and their respective 95 % confidence intervals (CI95 %), were calculated.
Results: 226 patients (113 cases and 113 controls) were analyzed. Significant differences were verified between cases and controls in frequency of evolutionary complications of HCE (OR: 5.5; p = 0.0003); and major rate of ASA I-II in controls (OR: 0.07; p < 0.0001). A great rate of POC (OR: 3.58; p = 0.0002); and Clavien ≥ IIIb POC more frequent in cases were found (OR: 7.00; p = 0.031). Applying logistic regression model, CCI score≥3 was identified as an independent prognostic factor for POC (OR: 6.29 [CI95 %: 2.1-18.8; p < 0.01]).
Conclusion: In this study, cases showed higher frequency and severity of POC than controls.
背景:肝囊性包虫病(HCE)手术术后并发症(POC)仍较为常见。合并症作为一种危险因素尚未得到研究。本研究的目的是评估CCI对手术治疗的HCE患者POC的预测价值。方法:巢式病例对照研究。2011年至2019年期间接受HCE选择性手术的患者;按性别、囊肿直径及随访时间进行1:1匹配。病例为CCI≥3的患者;对照组为CCI≤2的患者。主要结局为POC。采用描述性统计和双变量分析。采用Logistic回归,计算比值比(OR)和各自的95%可信区间(ci95%)。结果:226例患者,其中113例为病例,113例为对照组。HCE进化并发症的发生频率在病例和对照组之间存在显著差异(OR: 5.5; p = 0.0003);对照组ASA I-II主要发生率(OR: 0.07; p < 0.0001)。高POC率(OR: 3.58; p = 0.0002);且Clavien≥IIIb的POC发生率更高(OR: 7.00; p = 0.031)。应用logistic回归模型,CCI评分≥3是POC的独立预后因素(OR: 6.29 [CI95 %: 2.1 ~ 18.8; p < 0.01])。结论:本研究中,POC的发生率和严重程度均高于对照组。
{"title":"Evaluation of Charlson comorbidity index as a predictor of postoperative complications in patients with hepatic cystic echinococcosis. A nested case-control study.","authors":"Carlos Manterola, Josue Rivadeneira, Luis Alvarado, Luis Grande","doi":"10.1016/j.hpb.2025.12.025","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2025.12.025","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Postoperative complications (POC) in surgery for hepatic cystic echinococcosis (HCE) still being frequent. Comorbidities as a risk factor has not yet been studied. The aim of this study was to evaluate the predictive value of CCI for POC in surgically treated HCE patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Nested case-control study. Patients undergoing elective surgery for HCE between 2011 and 2019; matched (1:1) by sex, cyst diameter and time follow-up were included. Cases were patients with CCI≥3; and controls, patients with CCI≤2. Primary outcome was POC. Descriptive statistics and bivariate analyses were applied. Logistic regression was used, odds ratios (OR) and their respective 95 % confidence intervals (CI95 %), were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>226 patients (113 cases and 113 controls) were analyzed. Significant differences were verified between cases and controls in frequency of evolutionary complications of HCE (OR: 5.5; p = 0.0003); and major rate of ASA I-II in controls (OR: 0.07; p < 0.0001). A great rate of POC (OR: 3.58; p = 0.0002); and Clavien ≥ IIIb POC more frequent in cases were found (OR: 7.00; p = 0.031). Applying logistic regression model, CCI score≥3 was identified as an independent prognostic factor for POC (OR: 6.29 [CI95 %: 2.1-18.8; p < 0.01]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this study, cases showed higher frequency and severity of POC than controls.</p>","PeriodicalId":13229,"journal":{"name":"Hpb","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145878303","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-16DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2025.12.023
Linda N Nilsson, Agnieszka Popowicz, Folke Hammarqvist, Gabriel Sandblom
Background: A universally accepted quality measure for gallstone surgery is lacking. In this retrospective study, we evaluated the duration of postoperative care, completion with laparoscopic approach, absence of procedure-related complications, and no readmission as criteria for Textbook Outcome (TO).
Methods: Data was collected from the Swedish National Register for Gallstone Surgery (GallRiks) 2007-2022. We analyzed postoperative stay as exposure and postoperative complications as outcome using Receiver Operation Characteristic (ROC). TO was defined as laparoscopically completed operations, discharge within three days after surgery, no postoperative complication > Clavien-Dindo 2, no contact with the care provider or new readmission/intervention within 30 days post-surgery. The outcome of TO was further validated based on patients 6 months postoperatively answering SF-36.
Results: A total of 193 201 cholecystectomies were analyzed. Using discharge within three days postoperatively as threshold, the sensitivity was 50 % and the specificity 87 % for predicting a surgery-related complication. The rate of TO in the entire cohort was 79,4 %. Those who met the TO criteria rated notably higher on physical and mental scoring 6 months postoperatively (both p < 0.05) than those who did not.
Conclusion: The postoperative period of care and TO are robust outcome measures for evaluating results after gallstone surgery.
{"title":"Validation of postoperative period of care and textbook outcome as quality measures regarding gallstone surgery.","authors":"Linda N Nilsson, Agnieszka Popowicz, Folke Hammarqvist, Gabriel Sandblom","doi":"10.1016/j.hpb.2025.12.023","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2025.12.023","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A universally accepted quality measure for gallstone surgery is lacking. In this retrospective study, we evaluated the duration of postoperative care, completion with laparoscopic approach, absence of procedure-related complications, and no readmission as criteria for Textbook Outcome (TO).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data was collected from the Swedish National Register for Gallstone Surgery (GallRiks) 2007-2022. We analyzed postoperative stay as exposure and postoperative complications as outcome using Receiver Operation Characteristic (ROC). TO was defined as laparoscopically completed operations, discharge within three days after surgery, no postoperative complication > Clavien-Dindo 2, no contact with the care provider or new readmission/intervention within 30 days post-surgery. The outcome of TO was further validated based on patients 6 months postoperatively answering SF-36.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 193 201 cholecystectomies were analyzed. Using discharge within three days postoperatively as threshold, the sensitivity was 50 % and the specificity 87 % for predicting a surgery-related complication. The rate of TO in the entire cohort was 79,4 %. Those who met the TO criteria rated notably higher on physical and mental scoring 6 months postoperatively (both p < 0.05) than those who did not.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The postoperative period of care and TO are robust outcome measures for evaluating results after gallstone surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":13229,"journal":{"name":"Hpb","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145911151","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-16DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2025.12.018
Shahin Hajibandeh, Shahab Hajibandeh, Syed S Raza, David C Bartlett, Bobby V M Dasari, Nikolaos Chatzizacharias, Ravi Marudanayagam, Robert P Sutcliffe, Keith J Roberts
Background: The aim of theis study was toevaluate impact of duration of neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) on surgical resection rate, resection margin, response to treatment, and survival in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).
Methods: All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of NAT in patients with PDAC were included. Effect sizes were determined for surgical resection rate, R0 resection, radiological response to NAT and 1- to 5-years survival.
Results: Twenty-three RCTs (1880 patients) were included. NAT duration≤8 weeks was associated with significantly higher surgical resection rate [66.7 % (95 % CI 57.4 %-76.1 %)] compared with NAT duration >8 weeks [33.5 % (95 % CI 22.1 %-45.0 %)]. The difference remained significant when only resectable [73.9 % (95 % CI 64.3 %-83.5 %) vs 44.7 % (95 % CI 15.9 %-60.6.%)], borderline resectable [66.4 % (95 % CI 46.6 %-86.1 %) vs 22.5 % (95 % CI 18.2 %-26.8 %)], or mixed borderline resectable/locally advanced PDAC [60.6 % (95 % CI 48.2 %-73.0 %) vs 35.0 % (95 % CI 27.6 %-42.4 %)] were considered. Moreover, when only NAT with chemotherapy considered, resection rate remained significant in favour of NAT duration≤8. No significant difference was found in R0 resection rate, partial response, stable disease, or disease progression between two groups. Intention-to-treat respected 1-, 3-, 5-years survival were comparable.
Conclusions: NAT duration >8 weeks may be associated with a reduced surgical resection rate and no apparent improvement in negative resection margin in patients with PDAC, particularly borderline resectable cases. However, it may have comparable survival to NAT duration ≤8 weeks. Future randomised evidence is needed to overcome the limitations associated with current evidence.
背景:本研究的目的是评估新辅助治疗时间(NAT)对胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)患者手术切除率、切除边缘、治疗反应和生存的影响。方法:纳入所有PDAC患者的NAT随机对照试验(rct)。确定手术切除率、R0切除率、放射学对NAT的反应和1至5年生存率的效应量。结果:共纳入23项随机对照试验(rct),共1880例患者。与NAT持续时间≤8周[33.5% (95% CI 22.1% - 45.0%)]相比,NAT持续时间≤8周[66.7% (95% CI 57.4% - 76.1%)]的手术切除率显著高于NAT持续时间≤8周[66.7% (95% CI 57.4% - 76.1%)]。当仅可切除时,差异仍然显著[73.9% (95% CI 64.3% - 83.5%) vs 44.7% (95% CI 15.9% -60.6)]。考虑边缘可切除[66.4% (95% CI 46.6% - 86.1%) vs 22.5% (95% CI 18.2% - 26.8%)],或混合边缘可切除/局部晚期PDAC [60.6% (95% CI 48.2% - 73.0%) vs 35.0% (95% CI 27.6% - 42.4%)]。此外,当仅考虑NAT与化疗时,切除率仍然显著,有利于NAT持续时间≤8。两组在R0切除率、部分缓解、疾病稳定或疾病进展方面无显著差异。意向治疗的1、3、5年生存率具有可比性。结论:NAT持续时间bbbb8周可能与PDAC患者手术切除率降低和阴性切缘无明显改善有关,特别是边缘可切除的病例。然而,它的生存期可能与NAT相当,持续时间≤8周。需要未来的随机证据来克服与当前证据相关的局限性。
{"title":"Effect of duration of neoadjuvant therapy on pancreatic cancer outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Shahin Hajibandeh, Shahab Hajibandeh, Syed S Raza, David C Bartlett, Bobby V M Dasari, Nikolaos Chatzizacharias, Ravi Marudanayagam, Robert P Sutcliffe, Keith J Roberts","doi":"10.1016/j.hpb.2025.12.018","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2025.12.018","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of theis study was toevaluate impact of duration of neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) on surgical resection rate, resection margin, response to treatment, and survival in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of NAT in patients with PDAC were included. Effect sizes were determined for surgical resection rate, R0 resection, radiological response to NAT and 1- to 5-years survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-three RCTs (1880 patients) were included. NAT duration≤8 weeks was associated with significantly higher surgical resection rate [66.7 % (95 % CI 57.4 %-76.1 %)] compared with NAT duration >8 weeks [33.5 % (95 % CI 22.1 %-45.0 %)]. The difference remained significant when only resectable [73.9 % (95 % CI 64.3 %-83.5 %) vs 44.7 % (95 % CI 15.9 %-60.6.%)], borderline resectable [66.4 % (95 % CI 46.6 %-86.1 %) vs 22.5 % (95 % CI 18.2 %-26.8 %)], or mixed borderline resectable/locally advanced PDAC [60.6 % (95 % CI 48.2 %-73.0 %) vs 35.0 % (95 % CI 27.6 %-42.4 %)] were considered. Moreover, when only NAT with chemotherapy considered, resection rate remained significant in favour of NAT duration≤8. No significant difference was found in R0 resection rate, partial response, stable disease, or disease progression between two groups. Intention-to-treat respected 1-, 3-, 5-years survival were comparable.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>NAT duration >8 weeks may be associated with a reduced surgical resection rate and no apparent improvement in negative resection margin in patients with PDAC, particularly borderline resectable cases. However, it may have comparable survival to NAT duration ≤8 weeks. Future randomised evidence is needed to overcome the limitations associated with current evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":13229,"journal":{"name":"Hpb","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145878288","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (BR-PDAC) carries a high risk of early recurrence (ER) despite neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and surgery. Identifying ER predictors is essential to optimize surgical indication.
Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 70 patients with BR-PDAC, of whom 48 underwent resection. ER was defined as recurrence within 8 months. Pre- and post-NAC carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) levels were assessed using Cox regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.
Results: ER occurred in 18 patients (38%). Both pre-NAC (median, 699 vs. 71 U/mL; P = 0.010) and post-NAC CA19-9 levels (149 vs. 27 U/mL; P = 0.002) were significantly higher in ER patients. ROC curve analysis identified a post-NAC CA19-9 cutoff of 100 U/mL (area under the curve, 0.77) predicting ER. Patients with post-NAC CA19-9 ≥100 U/mL had significantly worse progression-free (hazard ratio [HR], 5.84; P < 0.001) and overall survival (HR, 6.36; P = 0.002). Notably, patients with ER had a similar OS to those who did not undergo surgery (HR, 0.93; P = 0.87).
Conclusions: Persistently elevated CA19-9 after NAC predicts ER and poor survival, suggesting limited benefit from resection. Post-NAC CA19-9 may help prevent futile pancreatectomy.
背景:边缘性可切除胰导管腺癌(BR-PDAC)尽管有新辅助化疗(NAC)和手术,但其早期复发(ER)的风险很高。确定ER预测因子对于优化手术指征至关重要。方法:我们回顾性分析了70例BR-PDAC患者,其中48例接受了手术切除。ER定义为8个月内复发。采用Cox回归和受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析评估nac前后碳水化合物抗原19-9 (CA19-9)水平。结果:发生ER 18例(38%)。ER患者nac前(中位数,699比71 U/mL, P = 0.010)和nac后CA19-9水平(149比27 U/mL, P = 0.002)均显著升高。ROC曲线分析发现nac后CA19-9的截止值为100 U/mL(曲线下面积为0.77),预测ER。nac后CA19-9≥100 U/mL患者的无进展(风险比[HR], 5.84, P < 0.001)和总生存期(HR, 6.36, P = 0.002)明显较差。值得注意的是,ER患者的OS与未接受手术的患者相似(HR, 0.93; P = 0.87)。结论:NAC术后持续升高的CA19-9预示着ER和较差的生存,表明切除的益处有限。nac术后CA19-9可能有助于预防无效胰切除术。
{"title":"Optimizing surgical indication in patients with borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma to prevent futile pancreatectomy.","authors":"Yusuke Kazami, Yoshikuni Kawaguchi, Tatsunori Suzuki, Kazunaga Ishigaki, Naminatsu Takahara, Sho Kiritani, Satoru Abe, Yuichiro Mihara, Yujiro Nishioka, Akihiko Ichida, Takeshi Takamoto, Nobuhisa Akamatsu, Mitsuhiro Fujishiro, Kiyoshi Hasegawa","doi":"10.1016/j.hpb.2025.12.021","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2025.12.021","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (BR-PDAC) carries a high risk of early recurrence (ER) despite neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and surgery. Identifying ER predictors is essential to optimize surgical indication.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 70 patients with BR-PDAC, of whom 48 underwent resection. ER was defined as recurrence within 8 months. Pre- and post-NAC carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) levels were assessed using Cox regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ER occurred in 18 patients (38%). Both pre-NAC (median, 699 vs. 71 U/mL; P = 0.010) and post-NAC CA19-9 levels (149 vs. 27 U/mL; P = 0.002) were significantly higher in ER patients. ROC curve analysis identified a post-NAC CA19-9 cutoff of 100 U/mL (area under the curve, 0.77) predicting ER. Patients with post-NAC CA19-9 ≥100 U/mL had significantly worse progression-free (hazard ratio [HR], 5.84; P < 0.001) and overall survival (HR, 6.36; P = 0.002). Notably, patients with ER had a similar OS to those who did not undergo surgery (HR, 0.93; P = 0.87).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Persistently elevated CA19-9 after NAC predicts ER and poor survival, suggesting limited benefit from resection. Post-NAC CA19-9 may help prevent futile pancreatectomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":13229,"journal":{"name":"Hpb","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145911006","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-15DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2025.12.026
Nabiha A Mughal, Omar Mahmud, Ingmar F Rompen, Mansour E Riachi, Brian D Kaplan, Daniel B Hewitt, Greg D Sacks, Christopher L Wolfgang, Ammar A Javed
Background: Pancreatic cancer with early onset is increasing but comparisons with average onset cases have yielded mixed results (EOPC versus AOPC; age <50 versus ≥50). We compared clinicopathologic features, prognosis, and molecular traits of resected EOPC versus AOPC.
Methods: We retrospectively included patients with PDAC resected between 2010 and 2017 from The National Cancer Database (NCDB). Clinicopathologic data were compared across EOPC versus AOPC. Kaplan-Meier curves and cox-regression were used to perform survival analysis. Molecular features were compared using data from the cBioPortal.
Results: 24,078 patients with resected PDAC were included, of whom 1698 (7.1 %) had EOPC. Poor prognostic factors, including high grade, advanced T-stage, and lymphovascular invasion, were less prevalent in EOPC (All p < 0.05). Patients with EOPC more frequently received neoadjuvant (28 % vs. 22 %; p < 0.001) and adjuvant chemotherapy (68 % vs. 58 %; p < 0.001) and experienced improved OS (median OS 29.5 vs 25.9 months, p = 0.023; 5-year OS: 26.9 % vs 20.8 %). No differences in the presence of key driver mutations were observed between the two groups but some distinct oncogenic mutations were observed in EOPC.
Conclusion: EOPC and AOPC are clinically similar but some cases of EOPC may harbor divergent molecular changes. These patients may have only marginally improved survival.
背景:早期发病的胰腺癌正在增加,但与平均发病病例的比较产生了不同的结果(EOPC与AOPC;年龄)方法:我们回顾性地纳入了2010年至2017年间从国家癌症数据库(NCDB)中切除的PDAC患者。比较EOPC和AOPC的临床病理资料。采用Kaplan-Meier曲线和cox-回归进行生存分析。分子特征比较使用数据从cBioPortal。结果:纳入24,078例PDAC切除术患者,其中1698例(7.1%)为EOPC。预后不良因素,包括高分级、晚期t期和淋巴血管侵犯,在EOPC中较少见(均p < 0.05)。EOPC患者更频繁地接受新辅助化疗(28%对22%,p < 0.001)和辅助化疗(68%对58%,p < 0.001),并经历了改善的OS(中位OS 29.5 vs 25.9个月,p = 0.023; 5年OS: 26.9% vs 20.8%)。关键驱动突变的存在在两组之间没有差异,但在EOPC中观察到一些不同的致癌突变。结论:EOPC与AOPC临床表现相似,但部分EOPC可能存在不同的分子变化。这些患者的生存可能只有轻微的改善。
{"title":"Clinical and molecular features of resected early onset pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: insights from the NCDB and cBioPortal.","authors":"Nabiha A Mughal, Omar Mahmud, Ingmar F Rompen, Mansour E Riachi, Brian D Kaplan, Daniel B Hewitt, Greg D Sacks, Christopher L Wolfgang, Ammar A Javed","doi":"10.1016/j.hpb.2025.12.026","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2025.12.026","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pancreatic cancer with early onset is increasing but comparisons with average onset cases have yielded mixed results (EOPC versus AOPC; age <50 versus ≥50). We compared clinicopathologic features, prognosis, and molecular traits of resected EOPC versus AOPC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively included patients with PDAC resected between 2010 and 2017 from The National Cancer Database (NCDB). Clinicopathologic data were compared across EOPC versus AOPC. Kaplan-Meier curves and cox-regression were used to perform survival analysis. Molecular features were compared using data from the cBioPortal.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>24,078 patients with resected PDAC were included, of whom 1698 (7.1 %) had EOPC. Poor prognostic factors, including high grade, advanced T-stage, and lymphovascular invasion, were less prevalent in EOPC (All p < 0.05). Patients with EOPC more frequently received neoadjuvant (28 % vs. 22 %; p < 0.001) and adjuvant chemotherapy (68 % vs. 58 %; p < 0.001) and experienced improved OS (median OS 29.5 vs 25.9 months, p = 0.023; 5-year OS: 26.9 % vs 20.8 %). No differences in the presence of key driver mutations were observed between the two groups but some distinct oncogenic mutations were observed in EOPC.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>EOPC and AOPC are clinically similar but some cases of EOPC may harbor divergent molecular changes. These patients may have only marginally improved survival.</p>","PeriodicalId":13229,"journal":{"name":"Hpb","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145896160","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-15DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2025.12.027
Catherine G Pratt, Nicolas Noriega, Jenna N Whitrock, Michela M Carter, Allison N Moore, Tiffany E Kaiser, Kristina H Lemon, Keith Luckett, Michael Schoech, Khurram Bari, Ralph C Quillin, Shimul A Shah
Background: Hepatitis C virus (HCV)-discordant liver transplants (LT), nonviremic and viremic, were first shown at our center as safe and efficacious for HCV-negative recipients in the short-term. This review evaluates HCV-discordant LT long-term outcomes.
Methods: All HCV-discordant deceased donor LT from 03/2016-06/2023 were reviewed in this retrospective, single-center study.
Results: 194 HCV-discordant LTs (96 (49.5 %) nucleic acid test (NAT)-negative and 98 (50.5 %) NAT-positive) were evaluated with a median follow-up of 53 months. Baseline liver biopsies of 139 (71.6 %) allografts, report 47 (24.2 %) no fibrosis, 27 (13.9 %) stage 1 fibrosis, and 65 (33.5 %) stage 2 fibrosis. Stage 2 fibrosis was higher among NAT-positive allografts (46.9 % vs. 19.8 %). Seven (6.3 %) NAT-negative allograft recipients experienced HCV transmission. One (1.1 %) NAT-positive allograft recipient experienced early HCV relapse, requiring additional treatment. All treated recipients achieved sustained viral response (SVR). There was no difference in patient or graft survival by allograft NAT status or fibrosis stage.
Conclusion: This is first report to show HCV-discordant LT exhibit low rates of relapse, achieve long-term SVR and have similar patient and graft survival regardless of allograft HCV viremia or fibrosis; thus, justifying their use for transplantation in the long-term.
背景:丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)-非病毒毒肝移植(LT)和病毒毒肝移植(LT)在我们中心首次被证明在短期内对丙型肝炎阴性受体是安全有效的。本综述评估了hcv不一致的LT长期预后。方法:在这项回顾性单中心研究中,对2016年3月至2016年6月期间所有hcv不一致的已故肝移植供者进行回顾性分析。结果:194例hcv -不一致LTs(核酸检测(NAT)阴性96例(49.5%),阳性98例(50.5%)),中位随访53个月。139例(71.6%)同种异体移植物的基线肝活检报告,47例(24.2%)无纤维化,27例(13.9%)1期纤维化,65例(33.5%)2期纤维化。nat阳性同种异体移植物的2期纤维化更高(46.9% vs. 19.8%)。7名(6.3%)nat阴性的同种异体移植受者经历了HCV传播。一名(1.1%)nat阳性的同种异体移植受者经历了早期HCV复发,需要额外的治疗。所有接受治疗的受者均获得了持续的病毒应答(SVR)。同种异体NAT状态或纤维化分期对患者或移植物的生存没有影响。结论:这是第一个报告显示HCV-不一致的LT具有低复发率,实现长期SVR,并且无论异体移植HCV病毒血症或纤维化具有相似的患者和移植物生存;因此,证明它们用于长期移植是合理的。
{"title":"Follow up and safety of use of hepatitis C virus discordant liver transplants.","authors":"Catherine G Pratt, Nicolas Noriega, Jenna N Whitrock, Michela M Carter, Allison N Moore, Tiffany E Kaiser, Kristina H Lemon, Keith Luckett, Michael Schoech, Khurram Bari, Ralph C Quillin, Shimul A Shah","doi":"10.1016/j.hpb.2025.12.027","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2025.12.027","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hepatitis C virus (HCV)-discordant liver transplants (LT), nonviremic and viremic, were first shown at our center as safe and efficacious for HCV-negative recipients in the short-term. This review evaluates HCV-discordant LT long-term outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All HCV-discordant deceased donor LT from 03/2016-06/2023 were reviewed in this retrospective, single-center study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>194 HCV-discordant LTs (96 (49.5 %) nucleic acid test (NAT)-negative and 98 (50.5 %) NAT-positive) were evaluated with a median follow-up of 53 months. Baseline liver biopsies of 139 (71.6 %) allografts, report 47 (24.2 %) no fibrosis, 27 (13.9 %) stage 1 fibrosis, and 65 (33.5 %) stage 2 fibrosis. Stage 2 fibrosis was higher among NAT-positive allografts (46.9 % vs. 19.8 %). Seven (6.3 %) NAT-negative allograft recipients experienced HCV transmission. One (1.1 %) NAT-positive allograft recipient experienced early HCV relapse, requiring additional treatment. All treated recipients achieved sustained viral response (SVR). There was no difference in patient or graft survival by allograft NAT status or fibrosis stage.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This is first report to show HCV-discordant LT exhibit low rates of relapse, achieve long-term SVR and have similar patient and graft survival regardless of allograft HCV viremia or fibrosis; thus, justifying their use for transplantation in the long-term.</p>","PeriodicalId":13229,"journal":{"name":"Hpb","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145900381","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-15DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2025.12.019
Wangxin Zhou, Shengwei Ji, Chunjie Zhang, Baoqing Liu, Hong Hong, Maowei Pei
Background: The optimal timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) in mild acute biliary pancreatitis (MABP) remains debated. This study compared early (within 72 h) versus delayed LC outcomes.
Methods: A randomized trial at Zhejiang Hospital assigned 120 MABP patients to early or delayed LC. Demographics, complications, operative outcomes, and hospital stay were analyzed.
Results: There were no differences in baseline demographics, overall complication rates (10 % vs. 8.3 %; P = 0.752), intraoperative blood loss (33.93 ± 17.68 mL vs. 37.08 ± 30.97 mL; P = 0.593) or conversion to open surgery rate (3.3 % vs. 5.0 %; P = 1.00) between the two groups. There were no recurrent biliary events, postoperative readmissions, reoperations, or deaths in either group; However, the early LC group demonstrated significant advantages in intraoperative adhesions (80 % vs. 93.3 %; P < 0.05), procedure time (61.87 ± 12.54 vs. 66.77 ± 12.11 min, P < 0.05) and the length of hospital stay (5 days vs. 7 days, P < 0.05).
Conclusion: For patients with MABP, early LC performed within 72 h of admission significantly reduces hospital length of stay and procedure time, without increasing perioperative complication rates or measures of procedural difficulty.
背景:轻度急性胆源性胰腺炎(MABP)的腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)的最佳时机仍有争议。本研究比较了早期(72小时内)和延迟LC的结果。方法:浙江医院的一项随机试验将120例MABP患者分配到早期或延迟LC。分析了人口统计学、并发症、手术结果和住院时间。结果:两组患者在基线人口统计学、总并发症发生率(10%对8.3%,P = 0.752)、术中出血量(33.93±17.68 mL对37.08±30.97 mL, P = 0.593)和中转开腹率(3.3%对5.0%,P = 1.00)方面均无差异。两组患者均无胆道事件复发、术后再入院、再手术或死亡;早期LC组在术中粘连(80% vs. 93.3%, P < 0.05)、手术时间(61.87±12.54 vs. 66.77±12.11 min, P < 0.05)、住院时间(5天vs. 7天,P < 0.05)方面均有显著优势。结论:对于MABP患者,在入院后72小时内进行早期LC可显著缩短住院时间和手术时间,且不增加围手术期并发症发生率或手术难度。
{"title":"Randomized controlled trial of early versus late cholecystectomy in patients with mild acute pancreatitis.","authors":"Wangxin Zhou, Shengwei Ji, Chunjie Zhang, Baoqing Liu, Hong Hong, Maowei Pei","doi":"10.1016/j.hpb.2025.12.019","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2025.12.019","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The optimal timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) in mild acute biliary pancreatitis (MABP) remains debated. This study compared early (within 72 h) versus delayed LC outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A randomized trial at Zhejiang Hospital assigned 120 MABP patients to early or delayed LC. Demographics, complications, operative outcomes, and hospital stay were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no differences in baseline demographics, overall complication rates (10 % vs. 8.3 %; P = 0.752), intraoperative blood loss (33.93 ± 17.68 mL vs. 37.08 ± 30.97 mL; P = 0.593) or conversion to open surgery rate (3.3 % vs. 5.0 %; P = 1.00) between the two groups. There were no recurrent biliary events, postoperative readmissions, reoperations, or deaths in either group; However, the early LC group demonstrated significant advantages in intraoperative adhesions (80 % vs. 93.3 %; P < 0.05), procedure time (61.87 ± 12.54 vs. 66.77 ± 12.11 min, P < 0.05) and the length of hospital stay (5 days vs. 7 days, P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For patients with MABP, early LC performed within 72 h of admission significantly reduces hospital length of stay and procedure time, without increasing perioperative complication rates or measures of procedural difficulty.</p>","PeriodicalId":13229,"journal":{"name":"Hpb","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145889158","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Solitary colorectal liver metastasis (SCRLM) exhibits substantial heterogeneity in recurrence patterns after hepatic resection, yet individualized prediction tools for recurrence-free survival (RFS) are lacking.
Methods: In this multicenter retrospective study, 698 SCRLM patients undergoing hepatic resection were analyzed (training cohort: n=574; validation cohort: n=124). RFS was the primary endpoint. Three predictive models-random survival forest (RSF), Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM), and eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost)-were developed and compared. Model performance was assessed via concordance index (C-index), time-dependent area under the ROC curve (AUROC), and calibration plots.
Results: The XGBoost model achieved the best performance, with AUROCs of 0.93 and 0.87 at 1 year, and 0.89 and 0.86 at 3 years, in the training and validation cohorts, respectively. Compared with the modified Clinical Score (m-CS), the model demonstrated significantly higher discrimination at 1, 2, and 3 years (all P < 0.001), and also identified a subgroup of patients more likely to benefit from postoperative chemotherapy. A user-friendly online tool was developed for clinical application: https://scrlm.shinyapps.io/scrlmapp/.
Conclusion: We developed and validated a machine learning-based model for SCRLM, enabling individualized recurrence risk prediction and guiding postoperative chemotherapy decisions. This approach may improve outcomes while reducing overtreatment.
{"title":"Machine learning model for recurrence-free survival in solitary resectable colorectal liver metastasis.","authors":"Mingshuai Wang, Jianli Duan, Hongwei Wang, Yuhong Li, Baocai Xing","doi":"10.1016/j.hpb.2025.12.024","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2025.12.024","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Solitary colorectal liver metastasis (SCRLM) exhibits substantial heterogeneity in recurrence patterns after hepatic resection, yet individualized prediction tools for recurrence-free survival (RFS) are lacking.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this multicenter retrospective study, 698 SCRLM patients undergoing hepatic resection were analyzed (training cohort: n=574; validation cohort: n=124). RFS was the primary endpoint. Three predictive models-random survival forest (RSF), Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM), and eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost)-were developed and compared. Model performance was assessed via concordance index (C-index), time-dependent area under the ROC curve (AUROC), and calibration plots.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The XGBoost model achieved the best performance, with AUROCs of 0.93 and 0.87 at 1 year, and 0.89 and 0.86 at 3 years, in the training and validation cohorts, respectively. Compared with the modified Clinical Score (m-CS), the model demonstrated significantly higher discrimination at 1, 2, and 3 years (all P < 0.001), and also identified a subgroup of patients more likely to benefit from postoperative chemotherapy. A user-friendly online tool was developed for clinical application: https://scrlm.shinyapps.io/scrlmapp/.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We developed and validated a machine learning-based model for SCRLM, enabling individualized recurrence risk prediction and guiding postoperative chemotherapy decisions. This approach may improve outcomes while reducing overtreatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":13229,"journal":{"name":"Hpb","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145910628","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-13DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2025.12.022
Marco Palucci, Gabriela D Angel-Millán, Fabio Giannone, Mariantonietta Alagia, Celeste Del Basso, Marco Lodin, Igor Monsellato, Federico Sangiuolo, Gianluca Cassese, Fabrizio Panaro
Background: Intraoperative localization of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) is challenging, particularly for small lesions during minimally invasive surgery due to the lack of tactile feedback. Indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence imaging is a promising technique to enhance tumor visualization and surgical guidance. This systematic review evaluates current evidence on ICG use in pNET surgery, focusing on indications, timing, dosage, and intraoperative strategies.
Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science was conducted up to May 2025, following PRISMA guidelines. Included studies reported intraoperative ICG use in pNET surgery. Preclinical studies, non-English articles, and those lacking data on ICG protocol or dosage were excluded.
Results: Fifteen studies involving 43 patients were included. Diagnoses were insulinoma (39.5 %), unspecified pNETs (58.2 %), and one case of neuroendocrine hyperplasia. ICG identified tumors in 88.4 % of cases, with a positive predictive value of 95.0 %. ICG was mostly administered intravenously after pancreatic exposure, with doses ranging from 1 to 25 mg. Fluorescence appeared within 5 min and was homogeneous in 97.4 % of cases. No adverse events were reported.
Discussion: ICG fluorescence is a safe and effective tool for localizing pNETs. Further studies are needed to standardize protocols and optimize clinical use.
背景:胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤(pNETs)的术中定位具有挑战性,特别是微创手术中由于缺乏触觉反馈的小病变。吲哚菁绿(ICG)荧光成像是一种很有前途的技术,可以增强肿瘤的可视化和手术指导。本系统综述评估了目前在pNET手术中使用ICG的证据,重点是指征、时机、剂量和术中策略。方法:系统检索PubMed, Embase和Web of Science,直到2025年5月,遵循PRISMA指南。纳入的研究报告了术中ICG在pNET手术中的应用。排除了临床前研究、非英文文章以及缺乏ICG方案或剂量数据的研究。结果:纳入15项研究,共43例患者。诊断为胰岛素瘤(39.5%),不明pNETs(58.2%), 1例神经内分泌增生。ICG对肿瘤的鉴别率为88.4%,阳性预测值为95.0%。ICG主要在胰腺暴露后静脉注射,剂量范围为1至25毫克。荧光在5分钟内出现,97.4%的病例荧光均匀。无不良事件报告。讨论:ICG荧光是一种安全有效的pNETs定位工具。需要进一步的研究来规范方案和优化临床应用。
{"title":"A systematic review of the application of indocyanine green in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: Technical details, surgical indications, and outcomes.","authors":"Marco Palucci, Gabriela D Angel-Millán, Fabio Giannone, Mariantonietta Alagia, Celeste Del Basso, Marco Lodin, Igor Monsellato, Federico Sangiuolo, Gianluca Cassese, Fabrizio Panaro","doi":"10.1016/j.hpb.2025.12.022","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2025.12.022","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intraoperative localization of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) is challenging, particularly for small lesions during minimally invasive surgery due to the lack of tactile feedback. Indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence imaging is a promising technique to enhance tumor visualization and surgical guidance. This systematic review evaluates current evidence on ICG use in pNET surgery, focusing on indications, timing, dosage, and intraoperative strategies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science was conducted up to May 2025, following PRISMA guidelines. Included studies reported intraoperative ICG use in pNET surgery. Preclinical studies, non-English articles, and those lacking data on ICG protocol or dosage were excluded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen studies involving 43 patients were included. Diagnoses were insulinoma (39.5 %), unspecified pNETs (58.2 %), and one case of neuroendocrine hyperplasia. ICG identified tumors in 88.4 % of cases, with a positive predictive value of 95.0 %. ICG was mostly administered intravenously after pancreatic exposure, with doses ranging from 1 to 25 mg. Fluorescence appeared within 5 min and was homogeneous in 97.4 % of cases. No adverse events were reported.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>ICG fluorescence is a safe and effective tool for localizing pNETs. Further studies are needed to standardize protocols and optimize clinical use.</p>","PeriodicalId":13229,"journal":{"name":"Hpb","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145862959","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}