首页 > 最新文献

Hpb最新文献

英文 中文
Conditional survival after curative resection for extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a comprehensive analysis of overall, recurrence-free, and relative survival. 肝外胆管癌根治性切除后的条件生存:总体、无复发和相对生存的综合分析。
IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Hpb
Pub Date : 2026-02-16 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2026.02.005
Hea Lim Choi, Danbee Kang, In Woon Han, Hong Kwan Kim, Hyeong Seok Kim, Sang Hyun Shin, Jin Seok Heo, Dong Wook Shin, Hongbeom Kim

Background: Conditional survival offers dynamic, time-adjusted prognostic information but remains understudied in extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (EHCC). This study evaluated conditional overall survival (COS), conditional recurrence-free survival (CRFS), and conditional relative survival (CRS) after curative-intent resection for EHCC.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 1266 patients who underwent curative-intent resection for EHCC (hilar, n = 424; common bile duct cancer [CBDC], n = 842) at a single institution between 2005 and 2019. Conditional 5-year COS, CRFS, and CRS were calculated annually using Kaplan-Meier methods and compared across demographic, clinical, and tumor-related subgroups.

Results: At baseline, 5-year COS, CRFS, and CRS were 41.3 %, 29.3 %, and 47.9 %, respectively, improving to 51.9 %, 50.0 %, and 59.3 % at five years post-surgery. Stage III patients demonstrated the largest gains in COS (24.7 %-51.0 %) and CRFS (14.6 %-53.3 %). Younger patients and females consistently had superior outcomes, whereas obese patients and those receiving adjuvant therapy showed less favorable long-term trends. Conditional survival patterns were similar between hilar and CBDC.

Conclusion: Conditional survival in EHCC improves substantially with time survived, particularly among advanced-stage, younger, and female patients. However, nearly 40 % remain at risk of recurrence even after 5 recurrence-free years. Conditional estimates provide dynamic insights to guide counseling and surveillance.

背景:条件生存提供了动态的、随时间调整的预后信息,但在肝外胆管癌(EHCC)中仍未得到充分研究。本研究评估了EHCC治疗意图切除后的条件总生存期(COS)、条件无复发生存期(CRFS)和条件相对生存期(CRS)。方法:我们对2005年至2019年在单一机构接受治疗目的切除的1266例EHCC患者(hilar, n = 424;胆总管癌[CBDC], n = 842)进行了回顾性队列研究。每年使用Kaplan-Meier方法计算条件5年COS、CRFS和CRS,并在人口统计学、临床和肿瘤相关亚组之间进行比较。结果:基线时,5年COS、CRFS和CRS分别为41.3%、29.3%和47.9%,术后5年分别改善为51.9%、50.0%和59.3%。III期患者在COS(24.7% - 51.0%)和CRFS(14.6% - 53.3%)方面的获益最大。年轻患者和女性患者的预后一直较好,而肥胖患者和接受辅助治疗的患者则表现出较差的长期趋势。hilar和CBDC的条件生存模式相似。结论:EHCC的条件生存率随着生存时间的延长而显著提高,尤其是在晚期、年轻和女性患者中。然而,近40%的患者在5年无复发后仍有复发风险。条件估计提供了指导咨询和监督的动态见解。
{"title":"Conditional survival after curative resection for extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a comprehensive analysis of overall, recurrence-free, and relative survival.","authors":"Hea Lim Choi, Danbee Kang, In Woon Han, Hong Kwan Kim, Hyeong Seok Kim, Sang Hyun Shin, Jin Seok Heo, Dong Wook Shin, Hongbeom Kim","doi":"10.1016/j.hpb.2026.02.005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2026.02.005","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Conditional survival offers dynamic, time-adjusted prognostic information but remains understudied in extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (EHCC). This study evaluated conditional overall survival (COS), conditional recurrence-free survival (CRFS), and conditional relative survival (CRS) after curative-intent resection for EHCC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 1266 patients who underwent curative-intent resection for EHCC (hilar, n = 424; common bile duct cancer [CBDC], n = 842) at a single institution between 2005 and 2019. Conditional 5-year COS, CRFS, and CRS were calculated annually using Kaplan-Meier methods and compared across demographic, clinical, and tumor-related subgroups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At baseline, 5-year COS, CRFS, and CRS were 41.3 %, 29.3 %, and 47.9 %, respectively, improving to 51.9 %, 50.0 %, and 59.3 % at five years post-surgery. Stage III patients demonstrated the largest gains in COS (24.7 %-51.0 %) and CRFS (14.6 %-53.3 %). Younger patients and females consistently had superior outcomes, whereas obese patients and those receiving adjuvant therapy showed less favorable long-term trends. Conditional survival patterns were similar between hilar and CBDC.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Conditional survival in EHCC improves substantially with time survived, particularly among advanced-stage, younger, and female patients. However, nearly 40 % remain at risk of recurrence even after 5 recurrence-free years. Conditional estimates provide dynamic insights to guide counseling and surveillance.</p>","PeriodicalId":13229,"journal":{"name":"Hpb","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2026-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147325948","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Systematic review of randomised controlled trials on pain domains and assessment methods in post pancreatectomy patients. 胰腺切除术后患者疼痛域和评估方法的随机对照试验的系统评价。
IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Hpb
Pub Date : 2026-02-14 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2026.02.006
Vivek Peddakota, Ruth Owen, Nejo Joseph, Litesh Chouhan Mudavath, Cecilie Siggaard Knoph, Louise Kuhlmann, Esther Pogatzki-Zahn, John Windsor, Asbjorn M Drewes, Sanjay Pandanaboyana

Background: This systematic review aims to identify the core outcome domains and assessment methods currently used in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) for acute postoperative pain following pancreatic surgery.

Methods: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched without restrictions. Eligible studies were screened and data extracted for pain assessment tools, analgesic outcomes, adverse effects, pain interference and quality-of-life measures.

Results: Fifteen RCTs involving 1034 patients were included. All trials assessed pain intensity using a visual analogue scale (n = 11) or a numerical rating scale (n = 4). Analgesic consumption was reported in 13 trials, with significant variability in the reporting, rescue analgesia and adverse effects. Pain interference or physical function was described in 10 trials, including pain on coughing (n = 4), mobilisation (n = 3), % gait speed and % peak cough flow (n = 2). Multidimensional tools were rarely used, with a single RCT employing three different scales. Psychological function was assessed in one trial using anxiety and depression scales.

Conclusion: There was notable heterogeneity in pain domains assessed and the tools used across pain management RCTs post-pancreatectomy. This highlights the need for standardized core outcome domains and multidimensional tools specific to pancreatic surgery to enable comparability of data and robust analysis.

背景:本系统综述旨在确定目前用于胰腺手术后急性术后疼痛的随机对照试验(rct)的核心结果域和评估方法。方法:检索PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library。筛选符合条件的研究,并提取疼痛评估工具、镇痛结局、不良反应、疼痛干扰和生活质量测量的数据。结果:纳入15项随机对照试验,共1034例患者。所有试验均使用视觉模拟量表(n = 11)或数值评定量表(n = 4)评估疼痛强度。13项试验报告了镇痛药的使用,在报告、抢救镇痛和不良反应方面存在显著差异。在10项试验中描述了疼痛干扰或身体功能,包括咳嗽疼痛(n = 4),活动(n = 3),步态速度%和咳嗽流量峰值% (n = 2)。多维工具很少使用,单个RCT采用三种不同的量表。一项试验使用焦虑和抑郁量表评估心理功能。结论:在胰腺切除术后疼痛管理随机对照试验中,评估的疼痛领域和使用的工具存在显著的异质性。这突出表明需要标准化的核心结果域和胰腺手术特定的多维工具,以实现数据的可比性和可靠的分析。
{"title":"Systematic review of randomised controlled trials on pain domains and assessment methods in post pancreatectomy patients.","authors":"Vivek Peddakota, Ruth Owen, Nejo Joseph, Litesh Chouhan Mudavath, Cecilie Siggaard Knoph, Louise Kuhlmann, Esther Pogatzki-Zahn, John Windsor, Asbjorn M Drewes, Sanjay Pandanaboyana","doi":"10.1016/j.hpb.2026.02.006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2026.02.006","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This systematic review aims to identify the core outcome domains and assessment methods currently used in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) for acute postoperative pain following pancreatic surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched without restrictions. Eligible studies were screened and data extracted for pain assessment tools, analgesic outcomes, adverse effects, pain interference and quality-of-life measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen RCTs involving 1034 patients were included. All trials assessed pain intensity using a visual analogue scale (n = 11) or a numerical rating scale (n = 4). Analgesic consumption was reported in 13 trials, with significant variability in the reporting, rescue analgesia and adverse effects. Pain interference or physical function was described in 10 trials, including pain on coughing (n = 4), mobilisation (n = 3), % gait speed and % peak cough flow (n = 2). Multidimensional tools were rarely used, with a single RCT employing three different scales. Psychological function was assessed in one trial using anxiety and depression scales.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was notable heterogeneity in pain domains assessed and the tools used across pain management RCTs post-pancreatectomy. This highlights the need for standardized core outcome domains and multidimensional tools specific to pancreatic surgery to enable comparability of data and robust analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":13229,"journal":{"name":"Hpb","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2026-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147316883","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Risk factors for unplanned intensive care unit admission after liver resection: a cohort study. 肝切除术后非计划入住重症监护病房的危险因素:一项队列研究。
IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Hpb
Pub Date : 2026-02-14 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2026.02.004
Alejandro Brañes, Brianna Greenberg, Alexandra W Acher, Keying Xu, Myriam Lafreniere-Roula, Kevin E Thorpe, Paul J Karanicolas

Background: Postoperative unplanned intensive care unit (ICU) admission is associated with increased cost and poor survival. The impact of perioperative factors on unplanned ICU admission after hepatectomy is unclear.

Methods: An analysis of participants in the Hemorrhage During Liver Resection: Tranexamic Acid (HeLiX) randomized trial was conducted. Participants were stratified by ICU admission status: no, planned, and unplanned. Multivariable multinomial logistic regression analysis was performed to determine variables associated with unplanned ICU admission and 90-day mortality was calculated.

Results: Of 1240 patients included, 868 (70 %) had no, 322 (26 %) had planned, and 50 (4 %) had unplanned ICU admission. On multivariable multinomial logistic regression analysis, prior cardiovascular disease (Relative Risk Ratio (RRR) 2.03; 95 % Confidence Interval (CI) 1.01-4.08), major liver resection (RRR 2.18; 95 % CI 1.12-4.27) and estimated blood loss per 500 mL (RRR 1.38; 95 % CI 1.23-1.55) were significantly associated with unplanned ICU admission. 90-day mortality rate for no, planned, and unplanned ICU admission was 1 %, 5 % and 16 %, respectively.

Conclusion: Prior cardiovascular disease, major liver resection, and higher estimated blood loss were associated with unplanned ICU admission and increased perioperative mortality after hepatectomy. Consideration should be given to early monitoring of patients with these risk factors to decrease mortality.

背景:术后非计划入住重症监护病房(ICU)与费用增加和生存率差有关。围手术期因素对肝切除术后非计划性ICU住院的影响尚不清楚。方法:对肝切除术出血:氨甲环酸(HeLiX)随机试验的参与者进行分析。参与者按ICU住院状态分层:无住院、计划住院和非计划住院。采用多变量多项逻辑回归分析确定与非计划入住ICU相关的变量,并计算90天死亡率。结果:1240例患者中,868例(70%)未住院,322例(26%)计划住院,50例(4%)非计划住院。多变量多项logistic回归分析,既往心血管疾病(相对危险比(RRR) 2.03;95%可信区间(CI) 1.01-4.08)、主要肝切除术(RRR 2.18; 95% CI 1.12-4.27)和估计每500 mL出血量(RRR 1.38; 95% CI 1.23-1.55)与计划外ICU住院显著相关。未入住、计划入住和计划外入住ICU的90天死亡率分别为1%、5%和16%。结论:既往心血管疾病、大肝切除术和较高的估计失血量与肝切除术后非计划ICU住院和围手术期死亡率增加相关。应考虑对具有这些危险因素的患者进行早期监测,以降低死亡率。
{"title":"Risk factors for unplanned intensive care unit admission after liver resection: a cohort study.","authors":"Alejandro Brañes, Brianna Greenberg, Alexandra W Acher, Keying Xu, Myriam Lafreniere-Roula, Kevin E Thorpe, Paul J Karanicolas","doi":"10.1016/j.hpb.2026.02.004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2026.02.004","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Postoperative unplanned intensive care unit (ICU) admission is associated with increased cost and poor survival. The impact of perioperative factors on unplanned ICU admission after hepatectomy is unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An analysis of participants in the Hemorrhage During Liver Resection: Tranexamic Acid (HeLiX) randomized trial was conducted. Participants were stratified by ICU admission status: no, planned, and unplanned. Multivariable multinomial logistic regression analysis was performed to determine variables associated with unplanned ICU admission and 90-day mortality was calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1240 patients included, 868 (70 %) had no, 322 (26 %) had planned, and 50 (4 %) had unplanned ICU admission. On multivariable multinomial logistic regression analysis, prior cardiovascular disease (Relative Risk Ratio (RRR) 2.03; 95 % Confidence Interval (CI) 1.01-4.08), major liver resection (RRR 2.18; 95 % CI 1.12-4.27) and estimated blood loss per 500 mL (RRR 1.38; 95 % CI 1.23-1.55) were significantly associated with unplanned ICU admission. 90-day mortality rate for no, planned, and unplanned ICU admission was 1 %, 5 % and 16 %, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Prior cardiovascular disease, major liver resection, and higher estimated blood loss were associated with unplanned ICU admission and increased perioperative mortality after hepatectomy. Consideration should be given to early monitoring of patients with these risk factors to decrease mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":13229,"journal":{"name":"Hpb","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2026-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147316852","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Challenging anatomy, comparable outcomes: a multicenter propensity score-matched analysis of robotic hepatectomy in posterosuperior versus anterolateral segments. 具有挑战性的解剖,可比较的结果:多中心倾向评分匹配分析机器人肝切除术后上段和前外侧段。
IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Hpb
Pub Date : 2026-02-13 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2026.02.002
Silvio Caringi, Annachiara Casella, Rebecca Marino, Paolo Magistri, Andrea Belli, Annarita Libia, Graziano Ceccarelli, Francesco Izzo, Marcello G Spampinato, Nicola De' Angelis, Patrick Pessaux, Tullio Piardi, Fabrizio Di Benedetto, Francesca Ratti, Riccardo Memeo

Introduction: Robotic liver resection has become increasingly adopted for minor hepatectomies, including lesions in the anatomically challenging posterosuperior (PS) segments. This study compares the perioperative and pathological outcomes of robotic minor resections in PS versus anterolateral (AL) segments across high-volume centers in Europe.

Materials and methods: A multicenter database of 730 robotic liver resections performed from 2011 to 2023 in nine European institutions was reviewed. After excluding major hepatectomies, patients were analyzed in three steps: overall cohort, comparison of PS vs AL resections, and two consecutive propensity score matches.

Results: PS resections consistently had longer operative times, increased blood loss, and increased frequency and duration of Pringle maneuver use in all analyses. Following propensity matching, postoperative outcome measures such as overall morbidity, major complications, readmission, mortality, length of stay, and R1 rates were similar for PS and AL resections.

Discussion: Despite greater intraoperative complexity, robotic surgery seems to offset the technical disadvantages of PS segments to obtain postoperative and pathological results comparable to AL resections.

Conclusion: Robotic minor liver resections in PS segments are safe and feasible when performed in experienced centers, supporting their broader adoption in advanced minimally invasive hepatobiliary surgery.

机器人肝切除术越来越多地应用于小型肝切除术,包括解剖上具有挑战性的后上节段病变。这项研究比较了欧洲大容量中心的机器人小切除PS和前外侧(AL)节段的围手术期和病理结果。材料和方法:回顾了2011年至2023年在9个欧洲机构进行的730例机器人肝脏切除术的多中心数据库。在排除主要肝切除术后,通过三个步骤对患者进行分析:总体队列、PS与AL切除术的比较以及两次连续的倾向评分匹配。结果:在所有分析中,PS切除术的手术时间均延长,出血量增加,Pringle手法的使用频率和持续时间增加。倾向匹配后,PS和AL切除的术后结局指标,如总发病率、主要并发症、再入院、死亡率、住院时间和R1率相似。讨论:尽管术中更复杂,机器人手术似乎弥补了PS节段的技术缺点,获得与AL切除相当的术后和病理结果。结论:机器人在经验丰富的中心进行PS节段小肝切除术是安全可行的,支持其在先进微创肝胆手术中的广泛应用。
{"title":"Challenging anatomy, comparable outcomes: a multicenter propensity score-matched analysis of robotic hepatectomy in posterosuperior versus anterolateral segments.","authors":"Silvio Caringi, Annachiara Casella, Rebecca Marino, Paolo Magistri, Andrea Belli, Annarita Libia, Graziano Ceccarelli, Francesco Izzo, Marcello G Spampinato, Nicola De' Angelis, Patrick Pessaux, Tullio Piardi, Fabrizio Di Benedetto, Francesca Ratti, Riccardo Memeo","doi":"10.1016/j.hpb.2026.02.002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2026.02.002","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Robotic liver resection has become increasingly adopted for minor hepatectomies, including lesions in the anatomically challenging posterosuperior (PS) segments. This study compares the perioperative and pathological outcomes of robotic minor resections in PS versus anterolateral (AL) segments across high-volume centers in Europe.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A multicenter database of 730 robotic liver resections performed from 2011 to 2023 in nine European institutions was reviewed. After excluding major hepatectomies, patients were analyzed in three steps: overall cohort, comparison of PS vs AL resections, and two consecutive propensity score matches.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PS resections consistently had longer operative times, increased blood loss, and increased frequency and duration of Pringle maneuver use in all analyses. Following propensity matching, postoperative outcome measures such as overall morbidity, major complications, readmission, mortality, length of stay, and R1 rates were similar for PS and AL resections.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Despite greater intraoperative complexity, robotic surgery seems to offset the technical disadvantages of PS segments to obtain postoperative and pathological results comparable to AL resections.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Robotic minor liver resections in PS segments are safe and feasible when performed in experienced centers, supporting their broader adoption in advanced minimally invasive hepatobiliary surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":13229,"journal":{"name":"Hpb","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2026-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147316892","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Laparoscopic ALPPS and future liver remnant hypertrophy: volume, function, and patient selection. 腹腔镜下ALPPS和未来肝残余肥厚:体积、功能和患者选择。
IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Hpb
Pub Date : 2026-02-08 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2026.02.001
Yinxian Cui, Xiaojun Yang
{"title":"Laparoscopic ALPPS and future liver remnant hypertrophy: volume, function, and patient selection.","authors":"Yinxian Cui, Xiaojun Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.hpb.2026.02.001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2026.02.001","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":13229,"journal":{"name":"Hpb","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2026-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147377316","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Benchmarking Pancreaticoduodenectomy Outcomes in Peru: a 15-year Single-Institution Experience Using Global Quality Metrics. 标杆胰十二指肠切除术在秘鲁的结果:15年的单机构经验使用全球质量指标。
IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Hpb
Pub Date : 2026-02-05 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2026.01.012
Gustavo Reaño-Paredes, Fritz Kometter, David Callacondo, Fernando Revoredo Rego, Guillermo Ángel Herrera-Chávez, Wuilber Ludeña Hurtado, Mónica Del Rocío Uribe-León, Jorge Tang, Angela Daniela Basurco Valer, José Luis Arenas Gamio, Miguel Aníbal Apaza-Canaza, Sheyla Alfaro Ita, Vanessa Bermúdez-Alfaro, Frederick Glenn Massucco Revoredo, Ítalo Landeo Aliaga, Liliana Del Pilar Fonseca Cavero, Félix Carrasco, Luis Villanueva Alegre, José De Vinatea de Cárdenas, Patricio M Polanco

Background: Reporting standards for pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) in low- and middle-income countries remain uneven, and regional data continues to be scarce. In this study, we summarize 15 years of experience from a high-volume center in Peru using internationally recognized surgical quality metrics.

Methods: We reviewed 414 PDs performed between 2009 and 2023. Outcomes were examined across three 5-year periods, using established definitions for morbidity, mortality, and key pancreatic complications. Composite indicators-Failure to Rescue (FTR) and Ideal Outcome (IO)-were also applied.

Results: Overall morbidity was 54.1 %; major morbidity was 30.7 %, and in-hospital mortality was 4.8 %. Ninety-day mortality was 6.0 %, FTR 15.7 %, and IO 60.1 %, all without significant temporal changes. Clinically relevant POPF occurred at 22 %, decreasing early on and rising again during the pandemic period. Delayed gastric emptying occurred at 10.4 %, while PPH (8.5 %), readmission (5.8 %), reoperation (10.6 %), and length of stay (11 days) remained stable. Periampullary adenocarcinoma accounted for most indications (78 %), with ampullary tumors being the most frequent.

Conclusions: This series-the largest contemporary Latin American report applying IO and FTR-shows outcomes comparable to international reference centers. These results were sustained despite increasing case complexity, the introduction of minimally invasive PD, and the disruptions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.

背景:低收入和中等收入国家胰十二指肠切除术(PD)的报告标准仍然不平衡,区域数据仍然稀缺。在这项研究中,我们总结了15年的经验,从高容量中心在秘鲁使用国际公认的手术质量指标。方法:我们回顾了2009年至2023年间进行的414例pd。使用既定的发病率、死亡率和主要胰腺并发症的定义,对三个5年期间的结果进行了检查。综合指标-抢救失败(FTR)和理想预后(IO)-也被应用。结果:总发病率为54.1%;主要发病率为30.7%,住院死亡率为4.8%。90天死亡率为6.0%,FTR为15.7%,IO为60.1%,均无明显的时间变化。临床相关的POPF发生率为22%,在早期下降,在大流行期间再次上升。胃排空延迟发生率为10.4%,而PPH(8.5%)、再入院(5.8%)、再手术(10.6%)和住院时间(11天)保持稳定。壶腹周围腺癌占大多数适应症(78%),壶腹肿瘤是最常见的。结论:本系列是当代应用IO和ftr的拉丁美洲最大的报告,其结果与国际参考中心相当。尽管病例复杂性不断增加,微创PD的引入以及COVID-19大流行造成的中断,但这些结果仍然保持不变。
{"title":"Benchmarking Pancreaticoduodenectomy Outcomes in Peru: a 15-year Single-Institution Experience Using Global Quality Metrics.","authors":"Gustavo Reaño-Paredes, Fritz Kometter, David Callacondo, Fernando Revoredo Rego, Guillermo Ángel Herrera-Chávez, Wuilber Ludeña Hurtado, Mónica Del Rocío Uribe-León, Jorge Tang, Angela Daniela Basurco Valer, José Luis Arenas Gamio, Miguel Aníbal Apaza-Canaza, Sheyla Alfaro Ita, Vanessa Bermúdez-Alfaro, Frederick Glenn Massucco Revoredo, Ítalo Landeo Aliaga, Liliana Del Pilar Fonseca Cavero, Félix Carrasco, Luis Villanueva Alegre, José De Vinatea de Cárdenas, Patricio M Polanco","doi":"10.1016/j.hpb.2026.01.012","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2026.01.012","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Reporting standards for pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) in low- and middle-income countries remain uneven, and regional data continues to be scarce. In this study, we summarize 15 years of experience from a high-volume center in Peru using internationally recognized surgical quality metrics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reviewed 414 PDs performed between 2009 and 2023. Outcomes were examined across three 5-year periods, using established definitions for morbidity, mortality, and key pancreatic complications. Composite indicators-Failure to Rescue (FTR) and Ideal Outcome (IO)-were also applied.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall morbidity was 54.1 %; major morbidity was 30.7 %, and in-hospital mortality was 4.8 %. Ninety-day mortality was 6.0 %, FTR 15.7 %, and IO 60.1 %, all without significant temporal changes. Clinically relevant POPF occurred at 22 %, decreasing early on and rising again during the pandemic period. Delayed gastric emptying occurred at 10.4 %, while PPH (8.5 %), readmission (5.8 %), reoperation (10.6 %), and length of stay (11 days) remained stable. Periampullary adenocarcinoma accounted for most indications (78 %), with ampullary tumors being the most frequent.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This series-the largest contemporary Latin American report applying IO and FTR-shows outcomes comparable to international reference centers. These results were sustained despite increasing case complexity, the introduction of minimally invasive PD, and the disruptions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.</p>","PeriodicalId":13229,"journal":{"name":"Hpb","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2026-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147364867","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A decade of pancreatoduodenectomy outcomes for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: 2014-2023 analysis of the N SQIP pancreatectomy PUF database: A decade of pancreatoduodenectomy in NSQIP. 十年胰十二指肠切除术治疗胰腺腺癌的结果:2014-2023年NSQIP胰腺切除术PUF数据库分析:十年胰十二指肠切除术在NSQIP。
IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Hpb
Pub Date : 2026-02-03 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2026.01.016
Frank G Lee, Katherine A Bews, Richa Bisht, Elizabeth B Habermann, Susanne G Warner, Cornelius A Thiels

Background: A decade of pancreas procedure-targeted NSQIP data can reveal trends in pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) at participating centers.

Methods: The pancreatectomy PUFs 2014-2023 were queried for PDs performed for pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Trends in neoadjuvant therapy (NAT), minimally invasive surgical (MIS) approach, vascular resection, positive margins, length of stay (LOS), unplanned conversion, post-operative pancreatic fistula (POPF), delayed gastric emptying (DGE), and 30-day mortality were evaluated across years with Chi-square and Mann-Kendall trend tests.

Results: With 24,067 patients identified, NAT and MIS rates doubled 24.0%-50.0% and 6.3%-14.7% respectively, with the latter driven by robotic approach. Unplanned conversion rates remained stable at 24.0% with higher rates in laparoscopic vs. robotic (36.2% vs. 17.0%, p<0.001). Vascular resections increased 23.1%-26.5%. POPF rates improved 13.6%-10.2% (p=0.049). Thirty-day mortality and DGE remained stable at 1.8% and 15.0% respectively. Median LOS decreased from 9 to 7 days. Positive margin rate (available starting in 2021) increased 16.0%-18.1% (p=0.039). Laparoscopic had the highest positive margin rate, 25.4% vs. open 17.2% and robotic 15.4% (p=0.004).

Conclusion: Over the last decade, NAT, robotic MIS, and vascular resection increased while 30-day mortality and complication rates remained stable for PDAC PDs. Robotic had lower rates of unplanned conversion and positive margins compared to laparoscopic.

背景:十年来针对胰腺手术的NSQIP数据可以揭示参与中心胰十二指肠切除术(PD)的趋势。方法:对2014-2023年胰腺切除术PUFs进行胰腺腺癌(PDAC)的PDs查询。新辅助治疗(NAT)、微创手术(MIS)入路、血管切除、阳性切缘、住院时间(LOS)、非计划转换、术后胰瘘(POPF)、胃排空延迟(DGE)和30天死亡率的趋势通过卡方和Mann-Kendall趋势检验评估了多年来的趋势。结果:在24,067例患者中,NAT和MIS率分别翻了一番,分别为24.0%-50.0%和6.3%-14.7%,后者由机器人方法驱动。非计划转换率稳定在24.0%,腹腔镜手术高于机器人手术(36.2% vs 17.0%)。结论:在过去十年中,腹腔镜手术、机器人MIS和血管切除术增加,而PDAC pd的30天死亡率和并发症发生率保持稳定。与腹腔镜手术相比,机器人手术有更低的非计划转换率和阳性切缘。
{"title":"A decade of pancreatoduodenectomy outcomes for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: 2014-2023 analysis of the N SQIP pancreatectomy PUF database: A decade of pancreatoduodenectomy in NSQIP.","authors":"Frank G Lee, Katherine A Bews, Richa Bisht, Elizabeth B Habermann, Susanne G Warner, Cornelius A Thiels","doi":"10.1016/j.hpb.2026.01.016","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2026.01.016","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A decade of pancreas procedure-targeted NSQIP data can reveal trends in pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) at participating centers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The pancreatectomy PUFs 2014-2023 were queried for PDs performed for pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Trends in neoadjuvant therapy (NAT), minimally invasive surgical (MIS) approach, vascular resection, positive margins, length of stay (LOS), unplanned conversion, post-operative pancreatic fistula (POPF), delayed gastric emptying (DGE), and 30-day mortality were evaluated across years with Chi-square and Mann-Kendall trend tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>With 24,067 patients identified, NAT and MIS rates doubled 24.0%-50.0% and 6.3%-14.7% respectively, with the latter driven by robotic approach. Unplanned conversion rates remained stable at 24.0% with higher rates in laparoscopic vs. robotic (36.2% vs. 17.0%, p<0.001). Vascular resections increased 23.1%-26.5%. POPF rates improved 13.6%-10.2% (p=0.049). Thirty-day mortality and DGE remained stable at 1.8% and 15.0% respectively. Median LOS decreased from 9 to 7 days. Positive margin rate (available starting in 2021) increased 16.0%-18.1% (p=0.039). Laparoscopic had the highest positive margin rate, 25.4% vs. open 17.2% and robotic 15.4% (p=0.004).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Over the last decade, NAT, robotic MIS, and vascular resection increased while 30-day mortality and complication rates remained stable for PDAC PDs. Robotic had lower rates of unplanned conversion and positive margins compared to laparoscopic.</p>","PeriodicalId":13229,"journal":{"name":"Hpb","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2026-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146213196","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Neoadjuvant therapy in gall bladder cancer improves resectability and survival: a prospective study. 新辅助治疗可提高胆囊癌的可切除性和生存率:一项前瞻性研究。
IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Hpb
Pub Date : 2026-02-02 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2026.01.015
Anupam Lahiri, Suchita Chowdhury, Shaifali Goel, Syed Assif Iqbal, Abhishek Aggarwal, Prerna Garg, Varun Goel, Vineet Talwar, Jaskaran Sethi, Shivendra Singh

Background: Gallbladder carcinoma has dismal prognosis with <20 % resectability at presentation. The role of Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) remains undefined.

Methods: This is a prospective single center study of 226 gallbladder carcinoma patients receiving NACT. Gemcitabine-platinum combinations were administered followed by response assessment. Primary endpoints included resectability and survival outcomes.

Results: Of 226 patients, 135 (59.7 %) completed NACT. Intention-to-treat resection rate was 36.2 % (82/226), increasing to 60.7 % (82/135) among treatment completers. R0 resection achieved in 95.1 % (78/82). Grade ≥3 toxicity occurred in 9.7 % with 1.7 % treatment-related mortality. Median overall survival: 27 months (resectable) versus 13 months (unresectable) (p < 0.001). Two-year overall survival: 62.1 % versus 31.4 % respectively. Perioperative mortality: 3.7 %; major morbidity: 13.5 %. Incidental gallbladder cancer showed higher resectability (44.1 % vs 33.7 %) with 2-year overall survival 75 % versus 55.6 %. Multivariate analysis identified resectability (HR 2.714, p = 0.0002), perineural invasion (HR 2.986, p = 0.018), and advanced T-stage (HR 1.940, p = 0.041) as independent prognostic factors.

Conclusions: NACT enables curative resection in 60.7 % completing treatment with acceptable toxicity, supporting incorporation into treatment algorithms for locally advanced gallbladder cancer.

背景:胆囊癌预后不佳。方法:这是一项前瞻性单中心研究,226例胆囊癌患者接受NACT治疗。给予吉西他滨-铂联合用药,随后进行疗效评估。主要终点包括可切除性和生存结局。结果:226例患者中,135例(59.7%)完成了NACT。意向治疗切除率为36.2%(82/226),在治疗完成者中增加到60.7%(82/135)。R0切除率为95.1%(78/82)。9.7%发生≥3级毒性,1.7%的治疗相关死亡率。中位总生存期:27个月(可切除)vs 13个月(不可切除)(p < 0.001)。两年总生存率:分别为62.1%和31.4%。围手术期死亡率:3.7%;主要发病率:13.5%。偶发胆囊癌具有更高的可切除性(44.1%对33.7%),2年总生存率为75%对55.6%。多因素分析发现可切除性(HR 2.714, p = 0.0002)、神经周围浸润性(HR 2.986, p = 0.018)和t期晚期(HR 1.940, p = 0.041)是独立的预后因素。结论:NACT使60.7%的患者完成治愈性切除,毒性可接受,支持纳入局部晚期胆囊癌的治疗方案。
{"title":"Neoadjuvant therapy in gall bladder cancer improves resectability and survival: a prospective study.","authors":"Anupam Lahiri, Suchita Chowdhury, Shaifali Goel, Syed Assif Iqbal, Abhishek Aggarwal, Prerna Garg, Varun Goel, Vineet Talwar, Jaskaran Sethi, Shivendra Singh","doi":"10.1016/j.hpb.2026.01.015","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2026.01.015","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gallbladder carcinoma has dismal prognosis with <20 % resectability at presentation. The role of Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) remains undefined.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a prospective single center study of 226 gallbladder carcinoma patients receiving NACT. Gemcitabine-platinum combinations were administered followed by response assessment. Primary endpoints included resectability and survival outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 226 patients, 135 (59.7 %) completed NACT. Intention-to-treat resection rate was 36.2 % (82/226), increasing to 60.7 % (82/135) among treatment completers. R0 resection achieved in 95.1 % (78/82). Grade ≥3 toxicity occurred in 9.7 % with 1.7 % treatment-related mortality. Median overall survival: 27 months (resectable) versus 13 months (unresectable) (p < 0.001). Two-year overall survival: 62.1 % versus 31.4 % respectively. Perioperative mortality: 3.7 %; major morbidity: 13.5 %. Incidental gallbladder cancer showed higher resectability (44.1 % vs 33.7 %) with 2-year overall survival 75 % versus 55.6 %. Multivariate analysis identified resectability (HR 2.714, p = 0.0002), perineural invasion (HR 2.986, p = 0.018), and advanced T-stage (HR 1.940, p = 0.041) as independent prognostic factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>NACT enables curative resection in 60.7 % completing treatment with acceptable toxicity, supporting incorporation into treatment algorithms for locally advanced gallbladder cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":13229,"journal":{"name":"Hpb","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2026-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146226519","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Accuracy and efficiency of artificial Intelligence–Assisted three-dimensional liver volumetry in living donor evaluation based on real world prospective data 基于真实世界前瞻性数据的活体供体评估中人工智能辅助三维肝脏体积测量的准确性和效率。
IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Hpb
Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-25 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2025.11.014
Hayeon Do, Jiyoung Baik, Suk Min Gwon, Eunjin Lee, Youngju Ryu, Bogeun Kim, Soyoung Lim, Namkee Oh, Jinsoo Rhu, Gyu-Seong Choi, Jongman Kim

Background

Accurate liver volumetry is crucial for safe living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). Manual segmentation is time-consuming and delays surgical planning. Artificial intelligence (AI) enables automated 3D volumetry, improving workflow efficiency and accuracy.

Methods

This retrospective study analyzed 583 living liver donor candidates who underwent preoperative CT volumetry between January 2023 and February 2025 at Samsung Medical Center. Donors were grouped into conventional 2D manual segmentation and AI-based 3D volumetry. Volumetric data before and after AI refinement were compared with intraoperative graft weights. Turnaround time, agreement between AI and manual results, and prediction accuracy were assessed. Subgroup analyses excluded donors with segmental resections or >5 % preoperative weight loss.

Results

Of 583 donors, 271 underwent surgery, and 239 met inclusion criteria. The AI group had shorter turnaround times (1.5 ± 1.5 vs. 4.2 ± 3.6 days; p < 0.001). AI and manually edited volumes correlated strongly (R2 = 0.992; mean difference 23.7 ± 39.5 mL). After exclusions, AI-based volumetry showed superior predictive performance (R2 = 0.818; median error 54.0 mL) versus conventional methods (R2 = 0.707; median error 65.0 mL).

Conclusions

AI-assisted 3D volumetry enables fast, accurate graft volume estimation, reducing processing time and manual effort in LDLT.

Clinical Trial Registration

Not applicable.
背景:准确的肝脏体积测量对于安全的活体供肝移植(LDLT)至关重要。人工分割费时且延误手术计划。人工智能(AI)实现了自动化的3D体积测量,提高了工作流程的效率和准确性。方法:本回顾性研究分析了2023年1月至2025年2月在三星医疗中心接受术前CT体积测量的583名活体肝供体候选人。供体分为传统的二维手工分割和基于人工智能的三维体积分割。人工智能细化前后的体积数据与术中移植物重量进行比较。评估了周转时间、人工智能和人工结果之间的一致性以及预测的准确性。亚组分析排除了部分切除或术前体重减轻5%的供体。结果:583例献血者中,271例接受手术,239例符合入选标准。AI组的周转时间较短(1.5±1.5 vs. 4.2±3.6天;p < 0.001)。人工智能与人工编辑卷相关性强(R2 = 0.992,平均差23.7±39.5 mL)。排除后,基于人工智能的体积法与传统方法(R2 = 0.707,中位误差65.0 mL)相比,具有更好的预测性能(R2 = 0.818,中位误差54.0 mL)。结论:人工智能辅助的3D体积法能够快速、准确地估计移植物体积,减少LDLT的处理时间和人工工作量。临床试验注册:不适用。
{"title":"Accuracy and efficiency of artificial Intelligence–Assisted three-dimensional liver volumetry in living donor evaluation based on real world prospective data","authors":"Hayeon Do,&nbsp;Jiyoung Baik,&nbsp;Suk Min Gwon,&nbsp;Eunjin Lee,&nbsp;Youngju Ryu,&nbsp;Bogeun Kim,&nbsp;Soyoung Lim,&nbsp;Namkee Oh,&nbsp;Jinsoo Rhu,&nbsp;Gyu-Seong Choi,&nbsp;Jongman Kim","doi":"10.1016/j.hpb.2025.11.014","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.hpb.2025.11.014","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Accurate liver volumetry is crucial for safe living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). Manual segmentation is time-consuming and delays surgical planning. Artificial intelligence (AI) enables automated 3D volumetry, improving workflow efficiency and accuracy.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective study analyzed 583 living liver donor candidates who underwent preoperative CT volumetry between January 2023 and February 2025 at Samsung Medical Center. Donors were grouped into conventional 2D manual segmentation and AI-based 3D volumetry. Volumetric data before and after AI refinement were compared with intraoperative graft weights. Turnaround time, agreement between AI and manual results, and prediction accuracy were assessed. Subgroup <strong>analyses excluded donors with segmental resections or &gt;5 % preoperative weight loss.</strong></div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 583 donors, 271 underwent surgery, and 239 met inclusion criteria. The AI group had shorter turnaround times (1.5 ± 1.5 vs. 4.2 ± 3.6 days; p &lt; 0.001). AI and manually edited volumes correlated strongly (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.992; mean difference 23.7 ± 39.5 mL). After exclusions, AI-based volumetry showed superior predictive performance (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.818; median error 54.0 mL) versus conventional methods (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.707; median error 65.0 mL).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>AI-assisted 3D volumetry enables fast, accurate graft volume estimation, reducing processing time and manual effort in LDLT.</div></div><div><h3>Clinical Trial Registration</h3><div>Not applicable.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13229,"journal":{"name":"Hpb","volume":"28 2","pages":"Pages 236-244"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145774608","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Repeat hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastasis with rates of second and third hepatectomy: time-to-recurrence and overall survival in a population-derived cohort 重复肝切除术治疗结直肠癌肝转移与第二次和第三次肝切除术的比率:复发时间和总生存率在人群来源的队列中。
IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Hpb
Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-14 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2025.11.006
Torhild Veen , Dordi Lea , Marcus Roalsø , Kjetil Søreide

Background

Repeat hepatectomy for recurrent colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) is offered to selected patients but with limited data from population-derived cohorts related to outcomes.

Method

An observational cohort study of patients who underwent an index hepatectomy for CRLM within a population-defined region. Clinicopathological and molecular data were recorded. Overall and recurrence-free survival was calculated.

Results

192 patients (245 hepatectomies) were included, of which 91 (47%) patients developed liver-recurrence after index hepatectomy, and 43 patients (47%) were offered a second repeat hepatectomy; 28 (64%) patients developed a further new liver-recurrence and 8 (29%) had a third re-hepatectomy. There was no clinicopathological difference between patients offered repeat hepatectomy and those that were not. Extrahepatic metastasis occurred more often in those with no repeat surgery (n = 30, 63%) than in the repeat hepatectomy group (n = 7, 16%; P < 0.001). Overall survival after first hepatectomy was 46 months (IQR 15–73). For patients offered hepatectomy, estimated median overall survival was 60 months (IQR 36–159). Median recurrence-free survival after repeat surgery was 6 months (IQR 3–22).

Conclusion

Repeat surgery for CRLM in a non-selected cohort offers favorable long-term overall survival, although recurrence free survival is short. Extrahepatic recurrence was the most prevalent factors negating further hepatectomy.
背景:重复肝切除术治疗复发性结直肠癌肝转移(CRLM)提供给选定的患者,但与结果相关的人群衍生队列数据有限。方法:一项观察性队列研究,在人群界定的区域内,接受CRLM指数肝切除术的患者。记录临床病理和分子数据。计算总生存率和无复发生存率。结果:纳入192例患者(245例肝切除术),其中91例(47%)患者在首次肝切除术后出现肝脏复发,43例(47%)患者进行了第二次重复肝切除术;28例(64%)患者再次出现肝脏复发,8例(29%)再次行肝切除术。在接受重复肝切除术的患者和没有接受重复肝切除术的患者之间没有临床病理差异。未重复手术组的肝外转移发生率(n = 30, 63%)高于重复肝切除术组(n = 7, 16%; P < 0.001)。首次肝切除术后的总生存期为46个月(IQR 15-73)。对于接受肝切除术的患者,估计中位总生存期为60个月(IQR 36-159)。重复手术后中位无复发生存期为6个月(IQR 3-22)。结论:在非选择性队列中,重复手术治疗CRLM可提供良好的长期总生存率,尽管无复发生存率较短。肝外复发是否决进一步肝切除术的最普遍因素。
{"title":"Repeat hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastasis with rates of second and third hepatectomy: time-to-recurrence and overall survival in a population-derived cohort","authors":"Torhild Veen ,&nbsp;Dordi Lea ,&nbsp;Marcus Roalsø ,&nbsp;Kjetil Søreide","doi":"10.1016/j.hpb.2025.11.006","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.hpb.2025.11.006","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Repeat hepatectomy for recurrent colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) is offered to selected patients but with limited data from population-derived cohorts related to outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>An observational cohort study of patients who underwent an index hepatectomy for CRLM within a population-defined region. Clinicopathological and molecular data were recorded. Overall and recurrence-free survival was calculated.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>192 patients (245 hepatectomies) were included, of which 91 (47%) patients developed liver-recurrence after index hepatectomy, and 43 patients (47%) were offered a second repeat hepatectomy; 28 (64%) patients developed a further new liver-recurrence and 8 (29%) had a third re-hepatectomy. There was no clinicopathological difference between patients offered repeat hepatectomy and those that were not. Extrahepatic metastasis occurred more often in those with no repeat surgery (n = 30, 63%) than in the repeat hepatectomy group (n = 7, 16%; P &lt; 0.001). Overall survival after first hepatectomy was 46 months (IQR 15–73). For patients offered hepatectomy, estimated median overall survival was 60 months (IQR 36–159). Median recurrence-free survival after repeat surgery was 6 months (IQR 3–22).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Repeat surgery for CRLM in a non-selected cohort offers favorable long-term overall survival, although recurrence free survival is short. Extrahepatic recurrence was the most prevalent factors negating further hepatectomy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13229,"journal":{"name":"Hpb","volume":"28 2","pages":"Pages 189-198"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145722674","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Hpb
全部 Adv. Atmos. Sci. ECOTOXICOLOGY Appl. Clay Sci. Int. J. Biometeorol. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta Int. J. Earth Sci. Conserv. Genet. Resour. Chem. Ecol. ERN: Stock Market Risk (Topic) Geochem. Int. Clean-Soil Air Water ACTA GEOL SIN-ENGL BIOGEOSCIENCES Geochem. J. Environmental Epigenetics ECOLOGY Resour. Geol. ERN: Other Macroeconomics: Aggregative Models (Topic) Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. ARCH ACOUST Geochem. Trans. EUROSURVEILLANCE Études Caribéennes PALAEOGEOGR PALAEOCL Nat. Clim. Change Q. J. Eng. Geol. Hydrogeol. Environmental Claims Journal Environmental Control in Biology Chin. Phys. C Basin Res. Geostand. Geoanal. Res. ASTROBIOLOGY Exp. Parasitol. npj Clim. Atmos. Sci. GEOGR FIS DIN QUAT EVOL MED PUBLIC HLTH Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. ERN: Other IO: Empirical Studies of Firms & Markets (Topic) Ocean Modell. Yan Ke Xue Bao (Hong Kong) 2011 International Conference on Infrared, Millimeter, and Terahertz Waves Archaeol. Anthropol. Sci. Environ. Eng. Manage. J. EXPERT REV ANTICANC 2012 IEEE/ACM Sixth International Symposium on Networks-on-Chip ACTA GEOL POL Palaeontol. Electronica 2013 IEEE International Symposium on Hardware-Oriented Security and Trust (HOST) Environ. Pollut. Bioavailability Environ. Eng. Res. Isl. Arc [Hokkaido igaku zasshi] The Hokkaido journal of medical science Int. J. Paleopathol. Earth Syst. Dyn. Bull. Geol. Soc. Den. 2013 IEEE 39th Photovoltaic Specialists Conference (PVSC) Ecol. Res. Exp. Cell. Res. Ann. Glaciol. J PALAEONTOL SOC IND ACTA PETROL SIN GROUNDWATER Environmental dermatology : the official journal of the Japanese Society for Contact Dermatitis Mon. Weather Rev. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research ACTA NEUROL BELG Crit. Rev. Eukaryotic Gene Express Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. Nat. Geosci. 2011 Annual Report Conference on Electrical Insulation and Dielectric Phenomena Zhongguo Yi Miao He Mian Yi J PHYS-CONDENS MAT INT J MOD PHYS B 2013 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol. ACTA POL PHARM COMP BIOCHEM PHYS C Environ. Prog. Sustainable Energy 2012 International Symposium on Geomatics for Integrated Water Resource Management Eurasian Journal of Medicine and Oncology Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. Ecol. Indic. ACTA MED OKAYAMA SEDIMENTOLOGY European journal of biochemistry Gondwana Res. J PHYS A-MATH THEOR Erziehungswissenschaftliche Revue Exp. Eye Res. Aust. J. Earth Sci. Meteorol. Z. ICARUS European Journal of Biological Research [1993] Proceedings Eighth Annual IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science ACTA MEDICA PORT ENVIRON GEOL BREAST J Gulhane Medical Journal Energy Ecol Environ Am. Mineral.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1