International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology最新文献

Background

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP) is associated with a high rate of disease recurrence following endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS). Type 2 disease is associated with a higher incidence of recurrence and is believed to impact disease resolution via interference with epithelial healing and pathogen immunity. We wished to verify if perioperative control of Type 2 inflammation with an anti-IL4/IL13 targeting monoclonal antibody and during the resolution period following surgery leads to better control of the disease long term.

Methods

In this prospective, placebo-controlled, double-blinded trial. Thirty adult subjects with recurrent CRSwNP underwent ESS plus or minus 14 weeks of perioperative dupilumab, initiated 4 weeks (two injections) pre-ESS. Subjective and objective parameters of nasal patency, olfaction, quality of life (QoL), and adverse events were monitored up to 52 weeks post-ESS. Microbiological culture was performed to characterize pathogens colonization under both conditions.

Results

ESS safely improved subjective and objective measures of nasal patency, olfaction, and QoL in both groups. Olfaction was conserved longer in the dupilumab-treated group, with 33.3% of subjects presenting anosmia at 12 months after ESS in the dupilumab group compared to 50.0% with placebo. This was associated with persistent decreases in serum IgE, which were not seen with placebo treatment. No unusual safety signals were observed.

Conclusion

Short-course adjuvant perioperative treatment with dupilumab is associated with improved long-term olfactory outcomes and persistent lowering of serum IgE.

Key points

Key points

Key points

Background

Type 2 biologics have been used increasingly for the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). However, patterns of biologic switching are understudied, and established guidelines for sequential or simultaneous use do not yet exist.

Methods

This is a Canadian multicenter retrospective study of real-world patient data. Patients were included if they had recurrent CRSwNP despite maximal medical and surgical management, and received at least one dose of a type 2 biologic. Patients who remained on their initial biologic comprised the continuous group. Patients with sequential or simultaneous use of more than one biologic comprised the switched group. We compared the characteristics of patients who continued and switched biologics.

Results

Note that 225 consecutive patients were included. Thirty-six (16%) switched biologics at least once, and six (3%) switched twice. The most common switch was from mepolizumab to dupilumab, with poor control of CRSwNP symptoms being the leading cause for this switch. Lack of efficacy was the main reason for switching off mepolizumab and omalizumab, while adverse events were the leading cause for switching off dupilumab. Additionally, mepolizumab patients were more likely to switch biologics late in their treatment, while dupilumab patients rarely switched after 12 months of therapy (p-value < 0.001).

Conclusions

Switching biologics for CRSwNP is frequent in Canadian rhinology practices, with 16% of patients switching at least once. The most common switch is from mepolizumab to dupilumab with inadequate CRSwNP control driving this switch. This study may help guide sequential or simultaneous use of biologics in CRSwNP patients.

Background

There is clear evidence that prevalence of primary antibody deficiency (PAD) is higher in children with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) than in the general population. The purpose of this multi-institutional and multidisciplinary evidence-based review with recommendations (EBRR) is to thoroughly review the literature on rhinosinusitis with PAD, summarize the existing evidence, and provide recommendations on the evaluation and management of rhinosinusitis in children with PAD.

Methods

The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were systematically reviewed from inception through December 2023. Studies on the evaluation and management of rhinosinusitis in PAD patients were included. An iterative review process was utilized in accordance with EBRR guidelines. Levels of evidence and recommendations on the evaluation and management principles for PAD were generated.

Results

A total of 50 studies were included in this evidence-based review. These studies were evaluated on the incidence of PAD in rhinosinusitis patients, the incidence of rhinosinusitis in PAD patients, and on the different treatment modalities used and their outcome. The aggregate quality of evidence varied across the reviewed domains.

Conclusion

Based on the currently available evidence, the incidence of PAD in children with recalcitrant CRS can be significantly elevated. Despite the presence of multiple studies addressing rhinosinusitis and PAD, the level of evidence supporting different treatment options continues to be lacking. Optimal management requires a multidisciplinary approach through collaboration with clinical immunology. There is need for higher level studies that compare different treatments in children with PAD and rhinosinusitis.

Key points

Key points

Background

Olfactory dysfunction (OD) is a key symptom of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). Although extensively studied in CRS with nasal polyps (CRSwNP), OD in CRS without nasal polyps (CRSsNP) remains under-researched. This study aims to assess the prevalence of OD and its evolution in surgically naïve patients with CRSsNP undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS).

Methods

This prospective study included 97 participants with CRSsNP (mean age, 46.5 years; 70.1% men) and 97 healthy controls (mean age, 46.5 years; 70.1% men). Participants underwent psychophysical evaluations of orthonasal (using the Sniffin’ Sticks test) and retronasal olfaction (using powdered aromas) at enrolment and 6 months post-ESS.

Results

Out of 97 patients, 81 (83.5%) completed all assessments. At enrolment, 23 (28.4%) CRSsNP patients had OD based on composite threshold, discrimination, identification scores, compared with 7 (8.6%) controls (absolute % difference, 19.8% [95% CI, 8.2–31.4]). Retronasal olfactory function was also significantly worse in CRSsNP patients. Six months post-ESS, 30 patients (37.0%) experienced a clinically significant improvement in olfactory, whereas nonsignificant changes were observed in retronasal olfactory score, and 3.7% of patients experienced a deterioration of the olfactory function.

Conclusions

In conclusion, although 37% of patients experienced a clinically significant improvement in their sense of smell following ESS, the overall prevalence of OD in this surgically naive population appears relatively low, especially when compared to that observed in patients with CRSwNP. Therefore, ESS may offer some benefits for enhancing orthonasal olfactory function, but the extent of these improvements appears to be limited.