Benjamin Borgert, Hannah Kay, Ram Sankar Basak, Deborah Usinger, Richard S Matulewicz, Ethan M Basch, Adam O Goldstein, Ronald C Chen, Marc A Bjurlin
Background: Smoking may negatively affect health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in prostate cancer survivors, even though it is not a smoking-related malignancy. The longitudinal association of smoking with HRQOL was evaluated by focusing on intensity and duration.
Methods: Patients from the population-based North Carolina Prostate Cancer Comparative Effectiveness and Survivorship Study, enrolled via the state cancer registry (2011-2013), were analyzed. HRQOL was measured with the Short Form 12 instrument at intervals of up to 5 years posttreatment. Smoking status was self-reported. Linear and mixed-effects models assessed associations with controlling for age, treatment, and time.
Results: Of 842 participants, 474 underwent prostatectomy, 258 had radiation therapy, and 110 had brachytherapy. Concurrent smoking was associated with worse general health, mental health, and physical functioning (all p < .05). Graded analysis revealed a significant dose response, with smoking ≥1 pack/day linked to the greatest declines in general health (β = -3.25; p < .001) and physical functioning (β = -2.35; p = .003) at 5 years.
Conclusions: Smoking demonstrates significant concurrent and longitudinal associations with poorer HRQOL in prostate cancer survivors, with a clear dose-response pattern. These results underscore the critical need to integrate structured smoking assessment and cessation support as a core component of comprehensive prostate cancer survivorship care.
背景:吸烟可能会对前列腺癌幸存者的健康相关生活质量(HRQOL)产生负面影响,即使它不是与吸烟相关的恶性肿瘤。通过关注吸烟强度和持续时间来评估吸烟与HRQOL的纵向关联。方法:通过州癌症登记处(2011-2013)登记的基于人群的北卡罗来纳州前列腺癌比较疗效和生存研究的患者进行分析。HRQOL在治疗后5年内用Short Form 12仪器测量。吸烟状况自述。线性和混合效应模型评估了年龄、治疗和时间控制的相关性。结果:在842名参与者中,474人接受了前列腺切除术,258人接受了放疗,110人接受了近距离放疗。结论:吸烟与前列腺癌幸存者较差的HRQOL存在显著的同步和纵向关联,具有明确的剂量-反应模式。这些结果强调了将结构化的吸烟评估和戒烟支持作为综合前列腺癌生存护理的核心组成部分的迫切需要。
{"title":"Impact of smoking on health-related quality-of-life outcomes in prostate cancer survivors.","authors":"Benjamin Borgert, Hannah Kay, Ram Sankar Basak, Deborah Usinger, Richard S Matulewicz, Ethan M Basch, Adam O Goldstein, Ronald C Chen, Marc A Bjurlin","doi":"10.1002/cncr.70336","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cncr.70336","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Smoking may negatively affect health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in prostate cancer survivors, even though it is not a smoking-related malignancy. The longitudinal association of smoking with HRQOL was evaluated by focusing on intensity and duration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients from the population-based North Carolina Prostate Cancer Comparative Effectiveness and Survivorship Study, enrolled via the state cancer registry (2011-2013), were analyzed. HRQOL was measured with the Short Form 12 instrument at intervals of up to 5 years posttreatment. Smoking status was self-reported. Linear and mixed-effects models assessed associations with controlling for age, treatment, and time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 842 participants, 474 underwent prostatectomy, 258 had radiation therapy, and 110 had brachytherapy. Concurrent smoking was associated with worse general health, mental health, and physical functioning (all p < .05). Graded analysis revealed a significant dose response, with smoking ≥1 pack/day linked to the greatest declines in general health (β = -3.25; p < .001) and physical functioning (β = -2.35; p = .003) at 5 years.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Smoking demonstrates significant concurrent and longitudinal associations with poorer HRQOL in prostate cancer survivors, with a clear dose-response pattern. These results underscore the critical need to integrate structured smoking assessment and cessation support as a core component of comprehensive prostate cancer survivorship care.</p>","PeriodicalId":138,"journal":{"name":"Cancer","volume":"132 5","pages":"e70336"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147342980","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Maria J Monroy-Iglesias, Kelli O'Connell, Jenna Bhimani, Victoria S Blinder, Rachael P Burganowski-Doud, Isaac J Ergas, Grace B Gallagher, Jennifer J Griggs, Narre Heon, Tatjana Kolevska, Yuriy Kotsurovskyy, Candyce H Kroenke, Cecile A Laurent, Raymond Liu, Kanichi G Nakata, Sonia Persaud, Janise M Roh, Yashasvini Sampathkumar, Sara Tabatabai, Emily Valice, Peng Wang, Erin J Aiello Bowles, Elisa V Bandera, Lawrence H Kushi, Elizabeth D Kantor
Background: For most cytotoxic drugs, guidelines recommend body-surface-area-based dosing, yet some patients start with reduced doses, potentially reflecting tolerability concerns. The relationship between first-cycle dose reductions and subsequent delivery is unclear.
Methods: The authors analyzed data from women with stage I-IIIA breast cancer treated with adjuvant chemotherapy. Sankey diagrams illustrated trajectories from first-cycle dose proportion (FCDP) to average relative dose intensity (ARDI, ratio of received to expected dose intensity across the regimen), and cumulative dose proportion (CDP, ratio of total received to expected dose). Poisson regression estimated adjusted prevalence ratios for reduced FCDP (<95% vs. ≥95%) and three outcomes: ARDI reduction beyond initial FCDP, receiving fewer cycles, and CDP reduction beyond initial FCDP. Analyses assessed effect modification by age, body mass index (BMI), and comorbidities. Dosing was analyzed for cytotoxic and HER2-targeted therapy.
Results: A total of 8772 (90.8%) patients started with FCDP ≥95%; most maintained ARDI ≥95% (65.1%) and CDP ≥95% (79.9%). In multi-variable models, FCDP <95% was not significantly associated with further ARDI or CDP reductions or receipt of fewer cycles. BMI modified these associations (p-interaction = .004 for fewer cycles; p-interaction = .03 for CDP), with positive associations among overweight but not obese or normal-weight patients. FCDP <95% was linked to a lower likelihood of further ARDI reductions for both therapy types and lower likelihood of cumulative dose reduction in HER2-targeted therapy.
Conclusions: Early dosing decisions shaped subsequent chemotherapy delivery. Most patients who began at full dose maintained consistent dosing, whereas early reductions did not stave off subsequent changes, underscoring the need to balance safety with adequate dose intensity.
{"title":"Initial chemotherapy dose reductions and subsequent treatment delivery in stage I-IIIA breast cancer.","authors":"Maria J Monroy-Iglesias, Kelli O'Connell, Jenna Bhimani, Victoria S Blinder, Rachael P Burganowski-Doud, Isaac J Ergas, Grace B Gallagher, Jennifer J Griggs, Narre Heon, Tatjana Kolevska, Yuriy Kotsurovskyy, Candyce H Kroenke, Cecile A Laurent, Raymond Liu, Kanichi G Nakata, Sonia Persaud, Janise M Roh, Yashasvini Sampathkumar, Sara Tabatabai, Emily Valice, Peng Wang, Erin J Aiello Bowles, Elisa V Bandera, Lawrence H Kushi, Elizabeth D Kantor","doi":"10.1002/cncr.70294","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cncr.70294","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>For most cytotoxic drugs, guidelines recommend body-surface-area-based dosing, yet some patients start with reduced doses, potentially reflecting tolerability concerns. The relationship between first-cycle dose reductions and subsequent delivery is unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors analyzed data from women with stage I-IIIA breast cancer treated with adjuvant chemotherapy. Sankey diagrams illustrated trajectories from first-cycle dose proportion (FCDP) to average relative dose intensity (ARDI, ratio of received to expected dose intensity across the regimen), and cumulative dose proportion (CDP, ratio of total received to expected dose). Poisson regression estimated adjusted prevalence ratios for reduced FCDP (<95% vs. ≥95%) and three outcomes: ARDI reduction beyond initial FCDP, receiving fewer cycles, and CDP reduction beyond initial FCDP. Analyses assessed effect modification by age, body mass index (BMI), and comorbidities. Dosing was analyzed for cytotoxic and HER2-targeted therapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 8772 (90.8%) patients started with FCDP ≥95%; most maintained ARDI ≥95% (65.1%) and CDP ≥95% (79.9%). In multi-variable models, FCDP <95% was not significantly associated with further ARDI or CDP reductions or receipt of fewer cycles. BMI modified these associations (p-interaction = .004 for fewer cycles; p-interaction = .03 for CDP), with positive associations among overweight but not obese or normal-weight patients. FCDP <95% was linked to a lower likelihood of further ARDI reductions for both therapy types and lower likelihood of cumulative dose reduction in HER2-targeted therapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Early dosing decisions shaped subsequent chemotherapy delivery. Most patients who began at full dose maintained consistent dosing, whereas early reductions did not stave off subsequent changes, underscoring the need to balance safety with adequate dose intensity.</p>","PeriodicalId":138,"journal":{"name":"Cancer","volume":"132 5","pages":"e70294"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147275285","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Amir Ashraf Ganjouei, Travis Zack, Isabel Friesner, William C Chen, Lauren Boreta, Steve E Braunstein, Michael W Rabow, Maria E Garcia, Julian C Hong
Introduction: Cancer diagnoses are associated with considerable psychological distress and increased incidence of new mental health disorders (MHDs). Our aim was to identify patterns and differences in the emergence of new MHDs within the first year following a cancer diagnosis, using data from a diverse, multi-institutional cancer cohort including more than half a million patients within a statewide academic health system.
Methods: The University of California Data Discovery Platform was used, which aggregates data of all patients at University of California-affiliated hospitals. We identified a cohort consisting of all adult patients with a cancer diagnosis and no documented MHDs before cancer diagnosis between 2013 and 2023. Multivariable adjusted time-partitioned hazard ratios for overall all-cause mortality were constructed using epochs of 12 through 35, 36 through 59, and 60 through 120 months.
Results: A total of 371,897 patients (mean age, 62.1 years) did not have a diagnosis. Following an incident cancer diagnosis, 39,687 patients (10.6%) developed a new MHD within a year. Of these, 13,904 (35.0%) were newly prescribed one or more oral psychotropic medications. After adjusting for covariates, early MHD was found to be linked to increased all-cause mortality in the initial 12 through 35 months (hazard ratio, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.47-1.56), which diminished over time, observed as 1.17 (95% CI, 1.11-1.24) for 36 through 59 months and 0.95 (95% CI, 0.89-1.01) for 60 through 120 months.
Conclusions: Patients with cancer who experience a mental health condition are at an increased risk of all-cause mortality. This reinforces and emphasizes existing recommendations for prompt screening and management of distress and mental health following a cancer diagnosis.
{"title":"Association of mental health disorders and all-cause mortality for patients with cancer: Large-scale analysis of University of California Health System Data.","authors":"Amir Ashraf Ganjouei, Travis Zack, Isabel Friesner, William C Chen, Lauren Boreta, Steve E Braunstein, Michael W Rabow, Maria E Garcia, Julian C Hong","doi":"10.1002/cncr.70254","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cncr.70254","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Cancer diagnoses are associated with considerable psychological distress and increased incidence of new mental health disorders (MHDs). Our aim was to identify patterns and differences in the emergence of new MHDs within the first year following a cancer diagnosis, using data from a diverse, multi-institutional cancer cohort including more than half a million patients within a statewide academic health system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The University of California Data Discovery Platform was used, which aggregates data of all patients at University of California-affiliated hospitals. We identified a cohort consisting of all adult patients with a cancer diagnosis and no documented MHDs before cancer diagnosis between 2013 and 2023. Multivariable adjusted time-partitioned hazard ratios for overall all-cause mortality were constructed using epochs of 12 through 35, 36 through 59, and 60 through 120 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 371,897 patients (mean age, 62.1 years) did not have a diagnosis. Following an incident cancer diagnosis, 39,687 patients (10.6%) developed a new MHD within a year. Of these, 13,904 (35.0%) were newly prescribed one or more oral psychotropic medications. After adjusting for covariates, early MHD was found to be linked to increased all-cause mortality in the initial 12 through 35 months (hazard ratio, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.47-1.56), which diminished over time, observed as 1.17 (95% CI, 1.11-1.24) for 36 through 59 months and 0.95 (95% CI, 0.89-1.01) for 60 through 120 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with cancer who experience a mental health condition are at an increased risk of all-cause mortality. This reinforces and emphasizes existing recommendations for prompt screening and management of distress and mental health following a cancer diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":138,"journal":{"name":"Cancer","volume":"132 5","pages":"e70254"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12926721/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147269222","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Two new options for NPM1-mutated relapsed, refractory acute myeloid leukemia: Researchers are looking into whether revumenib or ziftomenib can be combined with first-line standard-of-care treatment options.","authors":"Leah Lawrence","doi":"10.1002/cncr.70275","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.70275","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":138,"journal":{"name":"Cancer","volume":"132 5","pages":"e70275"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147352977","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Jennifer B. Reese PhD, Lauren A. Zimmaro PhD, Kristen A. Sorice BA, Li Zhang PhD, Jessica R. Gorman PhD, MPH, Mary B. Daly MD, PhD, Alexandra K. Zaleta PhD, Laura S. Porter PhD