<p>The combination of tarlatamab plus a PD-L1 inhibitor as maintenance therapy after first-line chemoimmunotherapy demonstrated a manageable safety profile and promising activity in patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). Results of the phase 1b DeLLphi-303 trial showed that first-line maintenance with tarlatamab plus either atezolizumab or durvalumab yielded progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) beyond what had been previously reported in trials of patients treated with first-line chemoimmunotherapy and a maintenance PD-L1 inhibitor plus lurbinectedin.<span><sup>1</sup></span></p><p>DeLLphi-303 enrolled 88 patients with ES-SCLC without disease progression after platinum–etoposide chemotherapy plus a PD-L1 inhibitor. Patients received tarlatamab with atezolizumab or durvalumab as maintenance therapy until disease progression. The median follow-up from the initiation of maintenance therapy was 18.4 months.</p><p>Common grade 3/4 adverse events included hyponatremia, anemia, and neutropenia. More than half (57%) of the patients experienced a serious adverse event, the most common of which were cytokine release syndrome (24%), pyrexia (7%), immune effector cell–associated neurotoxicity syndrome (5%), and pneumonia (5%).</p><p>With tarlatamab plus atezolizumab or durvalumab, the median PFS was 5.6 months, and the median OS was 25.3 months.</p><p>According to the DeLLphi-303 researchers, who were led by Kelly G. Paulson, MD, PhD, a clinical researcher at the Providence Swedish Cancer Institute in Edmonds, Washington, this median OS was higher than the median OS reported for atezolizumab in first-line maintenance in the IMpower133 maintenance-phase analysis (12.5 months)<span><sup>2</sup></span> and what was reported for lurbinectedin plus atezolizumab in IMforte (13.2 months).<span><sup>3</sup></span></p><p>“The current first-line treatment for patients with ES-SCLC is platinum plus etoposide and an anti-PD-L1 antibody, which is continued into the maintenance phase,” explains Daniel Morgensztern, MD, a professor of medicine at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, Missouri. “More recently, the addition of lurbinectedin to maintenance atezolizumab was associated with improved OS compared to atezolizumab alone in the IMforte trial.”</p><p>Although cross-trial comparisons should be done with caution, Dr Morgensztern says that “it is already known that tarlatamab is more effective than lurbinectedin, topotecan, or amrubicin in previously treated patients based on the DeLLphi-304 study,<span><sup>4</sup></span> and the results from the DeLLphi-303 are promising.”</p><p>“T-cell engagers and antibody–drug conjugates are providing unprecedented benefit in patients with SCLC,” says Dr Morgensztern. “The tendency is for both to be moved into the first-line setting, starting either during the induction phase or maintenance. Although it is very tempting to add tarlatamab to the maintenance phase, the mo
{"title":"Tarlatamab plus anti–PD-L1 as first-line maintenance for ES-SCLC demonstrates promising results","authors":"Leah Lawrence","doi":"10.1002/cncr.70179","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cncr.70179","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The combination of tarlatamab plus a PD-L1 inhibitor as maintenance therapy after first-line chemoimmunotherapy demonstrated a manageable safety profile and promising activity in patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). Results of the phase 1b DeLLphi-303 trial showed that first-line maintenance with tarlatamab plus either atezolizumab or durvalumab yielded progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) beyond what had been previously reported in trials of patients treated with first-line chemoimmunotherapy and a maintenance PD-L1 inhibitor plus lurbinectedin.<span><sup>1</sup></span></p><p>DeLLphi-303 enrolled 88 patients with ES-SCLC without disease progression after platinum–etoposide chemotherapy plus a PD-L1 inhibitor. Patients received tarlatamab with atezolizumab or durvalumab as maintenance therapy until disease progression. The median follow-up from the initiation of maintenance therapy was 18.4 months.</p><p>Common grade 3/4 adverse events included hyponatremia, anemia, and neutropenia. More than half (57%) of the patients experienced a serious adverse event, the most common of which were cytokine release syndrome (24%), pyrexia (7%), immune effector cell–associated neurotoxicity syndrome (5%), and pneumonia (5%).</p><p>With tarlatamab plus atezolizumab or durvalumab, the median PFS was 5.6 months, and the median OS was 25.3 months.</p><p>According to the DeLLphi-303 researchers, who were led by Kelly G. Paulson, MD, PhD, a clinical researcher at the Providence Swedish Cancer Institute in Edmonds, Washington, this median OS was higher than the median OS reported for atezolizumab in first-line maintenance in the IMpower133 maintenance-phase analysis (12.5 months)<span><sup>2</sup></span> and what was reported for lurbinectedin plus atezolizumab in IMforte (13.2 months).<span><sup>3</sup></span></p><p>“The current first-line treatment for patients with ES-SCLC is platinum plus etoposide and an anti-PD-L1 antibody, which is continued into the maintenance phase,” explains Daniel Morgensztern, MD, a professor of medicine at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, Missouri. “More recently, the addition of lurbinectedin to maintenance atezolizumab was associated with improved OS compared to atezolizumab alone in the IMforte trial.”</p><p>Although cross-trial comparisons should be done with caution, Dr Morgensztern says that “it is already known that tarlatamab is more effective than lurbinectedin, topotecan, or amrubicin in previously treated patients based on the DeLLphi-304 study,<span><sup>4</sup></span> and the results from the DeLLphi-303 are promising.”</p><p>“T-cell engagers and antibody–drug conjugates are providing unprecedented benefit in patients with SCLC,” says Dr Morgensztern. “The tendency is for both to be moved into the first-line setting, starting either during the induction phase or maintenance. Although it is very tempting to add tarlatamab to the maintenance phase, the mo","PeriodicalId":138,"journal":{"name":"Cancer","volume":"132 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://acsjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cncr.70179","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145891843","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Tuo Lan PhD, Mei Wang MS, AnnaLynn M. Williams PhD, Matthew J. Ehrhardt MD, MS, Jennifer Q. Lanctot PhD, Zhaoming Wang PhD, Shu Jiang PhD, Kevin R. Krull PhD, Gregory T. Armstrong MD, MSCE, Melissa M. Hudson MD, Graham A. Colditz MD, DrPH, Leslie L. Robison PhD, Kirsten K. Ness PhD, Yikyung Park ScD