首页 > 最新文献

Cancer最新文献

英文 中文
Dietary quality and chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy in colon cancer. 饮食质量与结肠癌化疗引起的周围神经病变
IF 6.1 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-05 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.35599
Stephanie L E Compton, Shengping Yang, Joseph Madere, Erin K Weltzien, Bette J Caan, Jeffrey A Meyerhardt, Kathryn H Schmitz, Justin C Brown

Background: Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a common and dose-limiting chemotoxicity caused by oxaliplatin. This study investigated the relationship between dietary quality and the development of moderate and/or severe CIPN in colon cancer survivors using data from the Focus on Reducing Dose-Limiting Toxicities in Colon Cancer with Resistance Exercise trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03291951).

Methods: Diet quality was collected using a 127-item food-frequency questionnaire and was scored using the Alternative Healthy Eating Index-2010 (AHEI-2010). CIPN was assessed with the Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events at each chemotherapy cycle. The association of dietary quality with time to the first moderate-to-severe (moderate-severe) or severe event of CIPN was estimated using Cox proportional hazards models. Only participants who received oxaliplatin were included in this analysis (n = 132).

Results: Seventy-four participants (56.1%) reported moderate-severe CIPN. Higher dietary quality was associated with a significantly decreased risk of moderate-severe CIPN (hazard ratio [HR], 0.96; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.93-0.99) and severe CIPN (HR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.85-0.98). Consumption of red and processed meat (HR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.07-2.83) and sugar-sweetened beverages (HR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.10-1.59) was associated with an increased risk of moderate-severe CIPN. Consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages also was associated with an increased risk of severe CIPN (HR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.14-2.18), whereas vegetable consumption was associated with a reduced risk of severe CIPN (HR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.09-0.73).

Conclusions: Among patients with colon cancer who received oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy, higher baseline dietary quality was associated with a reduced risk of moderate-severe CIPN.

背景:化疗引起的周围神经病变(CIPN)是奥沙利铂引起的一种常见的剂量限制性化疗毒性。本研究利用 "通过阻力运动减轻结肠癌剂量限制性毒性 "试验(ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03291951)的数据,调查了结肠癌幸存者的饮食质量与中度和/或重度 CIPN 发生之间的关系:采用 127 项食物频率调查问卷收集饮食质量,并采用替代性健康饮食指数-2010(AHEI-2010)进行评分。在每个化疗周期使用患者报告结果版不良事件通用术语标准对CIPN进行评估。采用 Cox 比例危险模型估算了饮食质量与首次中度至重度(中度至重度)或重度 CIPN 事件发生时间的关系。本分析仅包括接受奥沙利铂治疗的参与者(n = 132):结果:74 名参与者(56.1%)报告了中度-重度 CIPN。较高的饮食质量与中度-重度 CIPN(危险比 [HR],0.96;95% 置信区间 [CI],0.93-0.99)和重度 CIPN(HR,0.91;95% 置信区间 [CI],0.85-0.98)风险的显著降低有关。食用红肉和加工肉类(HR,1.78;95% CI,1.07-2.83)和含糖饮料(HR,1.33;95% CI,1.10-1.59)与中度-重度 CIPN 风险增加有关。饮用含糖饮料也与重度 CIPN 风险增加有关(HR,1.57;95% CI,1.14-2.18),而食用蔬菜与重度 CIPN 风险降低有关(HR,0.29;95% CI,0.09-0.73):结论:在接受奥沙利铂化疗的结肠癌患者中,较高的基线饮食质量与中度-重度CIPN风险的降低有关。
{"title":"Dietary quality and chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy in colon cancer.","authors":"Stephanie L E Compton, Shengping Yang, Joseph Madere, Erin K Weltzien, Bette J Caan, Jeffrey A Meyerhardt, Kathryn H Schmitz, Justin C Brown","doi":"10.1002/cncr.35599","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cncr.35599","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a common and dose-limiting chemotoxicity caused by oxaliplatin. This study investigated the relationship between dietary quality and the development of moderate and/or severe CIPN in colon cancer survivors using data from the Focus on Reducing Dose-Limiting Toxicities in Colon Cancer with Resistance Exercise trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03291951).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Diet quality was collected using a 127-item food-frequency questionnaire and was scored using the Alternative Healthy Eating Index-2010 (AHEI-2010). CIPN was assessed with the Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events at each chemotherapy cycle. The association of dietary quality with time to the first moderate-to-severe (moderate-severe) or severe event of CIPN was estimated using Cox proportional hazards models. Only participants who received oxaliplatin were included in this analysis (n = 132).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-four participants (56.1%) reported moderate-severe CIPN. Higher dietary quality was associated with a significantly decreased risk of moderate-severe CIPN (hazard ratio [HR], 0.96; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.93-0.99) and severe CIPN (HR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.85-0.98). Consumption of red and processed meat (HR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.07-2.83) and sugar-sweetened beverages (HR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.10-1.59) was associated with an increased risk of moderate-severe CIPN. Consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages also was associated with an increased risk of severe CIPN (HR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.14-2.18), whereas vegetable consumption was associated with a reduced risk of severe CIPN (HR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.09-0.73).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among patients with colon cancer who received oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy, higher baseline dietary quality was associated with a reduced risk of moderate-severe CIPN.</p>","PeriodicalId":138,"journal":{"name":"Cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142378814","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Association between visceral adiposity index and cancer risk in the UK Biobank cohort. 英国生物库队列中内脏脂肪指数与癌症风险之间的关系。
IF 6.1 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-03 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.35576
Solange Parra-Soto, Jirapitcha Boonpor, Nathan Lynskey, Carolina Araya, Frederick Ho, Jill P Pell, Carlos Celis-Morales

Background: The visceral adiposity index (VAI) is a marker of visceral fat accumulation and metabolic dysfunction, but there is limited evidence of its association with cancer. The objective of this study was to investigate associations between the VAI and both incident cancer at 23 sites and all-cause cancer.

Methods: In total, 385,477 participants (53.3% women; mean age, 56.3 years) from the UK Biobank prospective cohort were included in this study. The median follow-up was 8.2 years (interquartile range, 7.3-8.9 years). The VAI was calculated using formula the published by Amato et al. and was categorized into sex-specific tertiles. Twenty-four incident cancers were the outcomes. Cox proportional hazard models were adjusted for sociodemographics, lifestyle factors, and multimorbidity counts.

Results: Over the follow-up period, 47,882 individuals developed cancer. In the fully adjusted models, the VAI was associated with a higher risk of six cancer sites. Individuals in the highest tertile, compared with those in the lowest tertile, had higher risks of uterine (hazard ratio [HR], 2.09; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.76-2.49), gallbladder (HR, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.26-2.66), kidney (HR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.18-1.64), liver (HR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.00-1.56), colorectal (HR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.05-1.24), and breast (HR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.03-1.19) cancers and of all-cause cancer (HR, 1.05). There was no evidence of a nonlinear association between the VAI and cancer risk.

Conclusions: The VAI was associated with six cancer sites and with all-cause cancer. The prognostic and etiologic roles of visceral fat accumulation and dysfunction in cancer warrant further research.

背景:内脏脂肪指数(VAI)是内脏脂肪堆积和代谢功能障碍的标志,但有关其与癌症关系的证据有限。本研究的目的是调查内脏脂肪指数与 23 个部位的癌症和全因癌症之间的关系:本研究共纳入了英国生物库前瞻性队列中的 385,477 名参与者(53.3% 为女性;平均年龄 56.3 岁)。随访中位数为 8.2 年(四分位数间距为 7.3-8.9 年)。VAI采用Amato等人发表的公式计算,并按性别分为三等分。24种癌症是研究结果。Cox比例危险模型对社会人口统计学、生活方式因素和多病症计数进行了调整:结果:在随访期间,共有 47 882 人罹患癌症。在完全调整模型中,VAI 与罹患六种癌症的较高风险相关。与最低三分位数的人相比,最高三分位数的人罹患子宫癌(危险比 [HR],2.09;95% 置信区间 [CI],1.76-2.49)、胆囊癌(HR,1.83;95% 置信区间 [CI],1.在所有原因癌症(HR,1.05)中,没有证据表明非线性效应与癌症的发病率呈负相关。没有证据表明VAI与癌症风险之间存在非线性关联:结论:VAI与六种癌症部位和全因癌症有关。内脏脂肪堆积和功能障碍对癌症的预后和致病作用值得进一步研究。
{"title":"Association between visceral adiposity index and cancer risk in the UK Biobank cohort.","authors":"Solange Parra-Soto, Jirapitcha Boonpor, Nathan Lynskey, Carolina Araya, Frederick Ho, Jill P Pell, Carlos Celis-Morales","doi":"10.1002/cncr.35576","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.35576","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The visceral adiposity index (VAI) is a marker of visceral fat accumulation and metabolic dysfunction, but there is limited evidence of its association with cancer. The objective of this study was to investigate associations between the VAI and both incident cancer at 23 sites and all-cause cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In total, 385,477 participants (53.3% women; mean age, 56.3 years) from the UK Biobank prospective cohort were included in this study. The median follow-up was 8.2 years (interquartile range, 7.3-8.9 years). The VAI was calculated using formula the published by Amato et al. and was categorized into sex-specific tertiles. Twenty-four incident cancers were the outcomes. Cox proportional hazard models were adjusted for sociodemographics, lifestyle factors, and multimorbidity counts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over the follow-up period, 47,882 individuals developed cancer. In the fully adjusted models, the VAI was associated with a higher risk of six cancer sites. Individuals in the highest tertile, compared with those in the lowest tertile, had higher risks of uterine (hazard ratio [HR], 2.09; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.76-2.49), gallbladder (HR, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.26-2.66), kidney (HR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.18-1.64), liver (HR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.00-1.56), colorectal (HR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.05-1.24), and breast (HR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.03-1.19) cancers and of all-cause cancer (HR, 1.05). There was no evidence of a nonlinear association between the VAI and cancer risk.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The VAI was associated with six cancer sites and with all-cause cancer. The prognostic and etiologic roles of visceral fat accumulation and dysfunction in cancer warrant further research.</p>","PeriodicalId":138,"journal":{"name":"Cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142370363","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Association of health insurance coverage disruptions and breast and colorectal cancer screening. 医疗保险中断与乳腺癌和结直肠癌筛查的关系。
IF 6.1 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.35584
Kewei Sylvia Shi, Xuesong Han, Jessica Star, Jingxuan Zhao, K Robin Yabroff

Background: Health insurance coverage is critical for ensuring access to recommended health care in the United States. This study investigated the associations of health insurance coverage disruptions, also known as coverage churn, and receipt of breast and colorectal cancer screening.

Methods: Adults who were age-eligible and younger than 65 years (range, 50-64 years) for breast (n = 17,128 women) and colorectal (n = 32,562 individuals) cancer screening were identified from 5 years of the National Health Interview Survey. Adults were categorized into five groups based on insurance type at survey (private, public, none) and prior coverage disruptions within the past year. Screening outcomes included: (1) ever-screened, (2) past-year screening, and (3) guideline-concordant screening. Separate multivariate logistic regression models were used to evaluate the associations between insurance coverage disruptions and cancer screening.

Results: Among adults who had coverage at the time of the survey, 3.1% with private insurance and 6.5% with public insurance reported prior coverage disruptions. Individuals without health insurance coverage had the lowest level of screening. Among individuals who had private coverage, prior disruptions were associated with lower guideline-concordant screening in adjusted analyses (breast cancer screening: adjusted prevalence ratio [aPR], 0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.75-0.89; colorectal cancer screening: aPR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.72-0.86); among those who had public coverage, prior disruptions were also associated with lower guideline-concordant breast cancer screening (aPR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.60-0.89) and colorectal cancer screening (aPR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.72-0.99).

Conclusions: Health insurance coverage disruptions were associated with lower past-year and guideline-concordant breast and colorectal cancer screening. The current findings underscore the importance of stable health insurance coverage to improve cancer screening and early detection when treatment is most effective.

背景:在美国,医疗保险对于确保获得推荐的医疗服务至关重要。本研究调查了医疗保险中断(也称为保险流失)与接受乳腺癌和结直肠癌筛查之间的关系:从 5 年的全国健康访谈调查中确定了符合乳腺癌(17128 名女性)和结直肠癌(32562 人)筛查条件且年龄小于 65 岁(50-64 岁)的成年人。根据调查时的保险类型(私人、公共、无)和过去一年中的保险中断情况,成人被分为五组。筛查结果包括(1) 曾经筛查,(2) 过去一年筛查,以及 (3) 符合指南的筛查。分别使用多变量逻辑回归模型来评估保险中断与癌症筛查之间的关联:在接受调查时拥有保险的成年人中,3.1% 的私人保险和 6.5% 的公共保险报告称曾发生过保险中断。没有医疗保险的人筛查水平最低。在有私人保险的人群中,在调整后的分析中,之前的中断与较低的指南一致性筛查有关(乳腺癌筛查:调整后患病率比 [aPR],0.82;95% 置信区间 [CI],0.75-0.89;结直肠癌筛查:aPR,0.78;95% CI,0.72-0.86);在有公共保险的人群中,之前的中断也与较低的指南一致性乳腺癌筛查(aPR,0.73;95% CI,0.60-0.89)和结直肠癌筛查(aPR,0.84;95% CI,0.72-0.99)有关:结论:医疗保险中断与过去一年乳腺癌和结直肠癌筛查率较低以及与指南一致有关。目前的研究结果表明,稳定的医疗保险覆盖率对于改善癌症筛查和早期发现治疗效果非常重要。
{"title":"Association of health insurance coverage disruptions and breast and colorectal cancer screening.","authors":"Kewei Sylvia Shi, Xuesong Han, Jessica Star, Jingxuan Zhao, K Robin Yabroff","doi":"10.1002/cncr.35584","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.35584","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Health insurance coverage is critical for ensuring access to recommended health care in the United States. This study investigated the associations of health insurance coverage disruptions, also known as coverage churn, and receipt of breast and colorectal cancer screening.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adults who were age-eligible and younger than 65 years (range, 50-64 years) for breast (n = 17,128 women) and colorectal (n = 32,562 individuals) cancer screening were identified from 5 years of the National Health Interview Survey. Adults were categorized into five groups based on insurance type at survey (private, public, none) and prior coverage disruptions within the past year. Screening outcomes included: (1) ever-screened, (2) past-year screening, and (3) guideline-concordant screening. Separate multivariate logistic regression models were used to evaluate the associations between insurance coverage disruptions and cancer screening.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among adults who had coverage at the time of the survey, 3.1% with private insurance and 6.5% with public insurance reported prior coverage disruptions. Individuals without health insurance coverage had the lowest level of screening. Among individuals who had private coverage, prior disruptions were associated with lower guideline-concordant screening in adjusted analyses (breast cancer screening: adjusted prevalence ratio [aPR], 0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.75-0.89; colorectal cancer screening: aPR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.72-0.86); among those who had public coverage, prior disruptions were also associated with lower guideline-concordant breast cancer screening (aPR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.60-0.89) and colorectal cancer screening (aPR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.72-0.99).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Health insurance coverage disruptions were associated with lower past-year and guideline-concordant breast and colorectal cancer screening. The current findings underscore the importance of stable health insurance coverage to improve cancer screening and early detection when treatment is most effective.</p>","PeriodicalId":138,"journal":{"name":"Cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142363571","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Breastfeeding experiences among young breast cancer survivors: A survey study. 年轻乳腺癌幸存者的母乳喂养经历:一项调查研究。
IF 6.1 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-29 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.35585
Tal Sella, Kimia Sorouri, Shoshana M Rosenberg, Maggie Loucks, Gregory Kirkner, Craig Snow, Kathryn J Ruddy, Shari I Gelber, Rulla M Tamimi, Jeffrey M Peppercorn, Lidia Schapira, Virginia F Borges, Steven E Come, Ellen Warner, Ann H Partridge

Background: Following breast cancer (BC), many young women are interested in future childbearing and some may wish to breastfeed. However, limited information is available regarding their lactation experiences.

Methods: Participants in the Young Women's Breast Cancer Study, a multicenter, prospective cohort study of women ≤40 years diagnosed with stage 0-III BC between 2006-2016 and who reported one or more live births following diagnosis, were surveyed about pregnancy and breastfeeding after BC treatment, including reasons for attempting and stopping breastfeeding, satisfaction, and supports.

Results: Of 143 eligible women sent a survey, 115 responded and 94 were included in the analytic cohort. Breastfeeding was attempted by 55% of women (52 of 94). Among those who had not attempted, 93% noted prior bilateral mastectomies (39 of 42). Among those who attempted breastfeeding, 69% had undergone lumpectomy and radiotherapy (36 of 52), 83% of whom reported no milk production from their treated breast (30 of 36). Most (65%, 34 of 52) were at least somewhat satisfied with their ability to breastfeed. Reasons for stopping breastfeeding included: having completed the planned duration (36%, 19 of 52); to start/resume endocrine therapy (21%, 11 of 52); and to resume breast imaging (8%, 4 of 52). Approximately half (27 of 55) of women who had not undergone bilateral mastectomies recalled receiving specific information about breastfeeding after BC, mostly from the oncology team (59%, 16 of 27), online resources (48%, 13 of 27), or a lactation consultant (44%, 12 of 27).

Conclusion: Most young BC survivors who attempted to breastfeed were able to and were satisfied with the experience, despite challenges. Specific resources to support BC survivors who wish to breastfeed are needed.

背景:许多年轻女性在罹患乳腺癌(BC)后对未来的生育问题很感兴趣,其中一些人可能希望进行母乳喂养。然而,有关她们哺乳经历的信息却很有限:年轻女性乳腺癌研究是一项多中心、前瞻性队列研究,研究对象是在 2006-2016 年间被诊断为 0-III 期乳腺癌且年龄小于 40 岁的女性,她们在确诊后报告了一次或多次活产,研究人员对这些女性进行了调查,了解她们在乳腺癌治疗后怀孕和哺乳的情况,包括尝试和停止哺乳的原因、满意度和支持:在收到调查问卷的 143 名符合条件的妇女中,115 人做出了回复,94 人被纳入分析队列。55%的妇女尝试过母乳喂养(94 人中有 52 人)。在未尝试母乳喂养的妇女中,93%的人指出曾进行过双侧乳房切除术(42 人中有 39 人)。在尝试母乳喂养的妇女中,69%的人接受过乳房肿块切除术和放射治疗(52 人中有 36 人),其中 83% 的人表示接受过治疗的乳房没有分泌乳汁(36 人中有 30 人)。大多数人(65%,52 人中的 34 人)至少对自己的母乳喂养能力感到有些满意。停止母乳喂养的原因包括:完成了计划的持续时间(36%,52 人中有 19 人);开始/恢复内分泌治疗(21%,52 人中有 11 人);以及恢复乳腺成像(8%,52 人中有 4 人)。在未接受双侧乳房切除术的妇女中,约有一半(55 人中有 27 人)回忆起她们在乳腺癌术后获得了有关母乳喂养的具体信息,这些信息大多来自肿瘤团队(27 人中有 16 人,占 59%)、在线资源(27 人中有 13 人,占 48%)或哺乳顾问(27 人中有 12 人,占 44%):结论:尽管存在挑战,但大多数尝试母乳喂养的年轻乳腺癌幸存者都能够进行母乳喂养,并对母乳喂养体验感到满意。我们需要特定的资源来支持希望进行母乳喂养的 BC 幸存者。
{"title":"Breastfeeding experiences among young breast cancer survivors: A survey study.","authors":"Tal Sella, Kimia Sorouri, Shoshana M Rosenberg, Maggie Loucks, Gregory Kirkner, Craig Snow, Kathryn J Ruddy, Shari I Gelber, Rulla M Tamimi, Jeffrey M Peppercorn, Lidia Schapira, Virginia F Borges, Steven E Come, Ellen Warner, Ann H Partridge","doi":"10.1002/cncr.35585","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.35585","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Following breast cancer (BC), many young women are interested in future childbearing and some may wish to breastfeed. However, limited information is available regarding their lactation experiences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants in the Young Women's Breast Cancer Study, a multicenter, prospective cohort study of women ≤40 years diagnosed with stage 0-III BC between 2006-2016 and who reported one or more live births following diagnosis, were surveyed about pregnancy and breastfeeding after BC treatment, including reasons for attempting and stopping breastfeeding, satisfaction, and supports.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 143 eligible women sent a survey, 115 responded and 94 were included in the analytic cohort. Breastfeeding was attempted by 55% of women (52 of 94). Among those who had not attempted, 93% noted prior bilateral mastectomies (39 of 42). Among those who attempted breastfeeding, 69% had undergone lumpectomy and radiotherapy (36 of 52), 83% of whom reported no milk production from their treated breast (30 of 36). Most (65%, 34 of 52) were at least somewhat satisfied with their ability to breastfeed. Reasons for stopping breastfeeding included: having completed the planned duration (36%, 19 of 52); to start/resume endocrine therapy (21%, 11 of 52); and to resume breast imaging (8%, 4 of 52). Approximately half (27 of 55) of women who had not undergone bilateral mastectomies recalled receiving specific information about breastfeeding after BC, mostly from the oncology team (59%, 16 of 27), online resources (48%, 13 of 27), or a lactation consultant (44%, 12 of 27).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most young BC survivors who attempted to breastfeed were able to and were satisfied with the experience, despite challenges. Specific resources to support BC survivors who wish to breastfeed are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":138,"journal":{"name":"Cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2024-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142337739","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Southwest Oncology Group S0826: A phase 2 trial of SCH 727965 (NSC 727135, dinaciclib) in patients with stage IV melanoma. 西南肿瘤学组 S0826:SCH 727965(NSC 727135,dinaciclib)治疗 IV 期黑色素瘤患者的 2 期试验。
IF 6.1 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-29 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.35587
Christopher D Lao, James Moon, Vincent T Ma, John P Fruehauf, Lawrence E Flaherty, Martin J Bury, William G Martin, Howard Gross, Wallace Akerley, Judith O Hopkins, Sapna P Patel, Vernon K Sondak, Antoni Ribas

Background: Cell cycle inhibition is an established therapeutic approach for some cancers. A multicenter, single-arm, phase 2 trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00937937) of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor SCH 727965 (NSC 747135; dinaciclib) was conducted in patients with metastatic melanoma to determine its clinical activity.

Methods: Patients with metastatic melanoma of cutaneous or mucosal origin were eligible if they had zero to one previous treatments, a Zubrod performance status of 0-1, and adequate organ function. SCH 727965 50 mg/m2 was given intravenously every 3 weeks until progression. Co-primary end points were 1-year overall survival (OS) and 6-month progression-free survival (PFS).

Results: Seventy-two patients were enrolled from July 1, 2009, to November 1, 2010, at 24 institutions. Sixty-eight percent of patients had M1c disease, and 43% had elevated lactate dehydrogenase levels. Twenty-eight patients (39%) experienced grade 4 adverse events, including 20 cases of neutropenia. Sixty-seven patients were evaluable for response. There was a response in zero of 67 patients (95% confidence interval [CI], 0%-5%), and stable disease was observed in 21%. The estimated median PFS was 1.4 months (95% CI, 1.4-1.5 months), and the 6-month PFS rate was 6% (2%-13%). The median OS was 8.2 months (95% CI, 5.5-10.5 months), and the 1-year OS rate was 38% (95% CI, 26%-49%).

Conclusions: This multicenter, US National Cancer Institute Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program-sponsored trial of SCH 727965 was conducted at a time when the current generation of effective therapies for melanoma were not available. Although the null hypothesis of 1-year OS was rejected, the minimal PFS impact and substantive toxicity indicated that this regimen lacks justification for further investigation as a single agent.

背景:细胞周期抑制是一种治疗某些癌症的成熟方法。为了确定细胞周期依赖性激酶抑制剂SCH 727965(NSC 747135;dinaciclib)的临床活性,我们在转移性黑色素瘤患者中开展了一项多中心、单臂、2期试验(ClinicalTrials.gov标识符NCT00937937):皮肤或粘膜转移性黑色素瘤患者,如果既往治疗次数为零到一次,祖布罗德表现状态为0-1,且器官功能正常,则符合条件。SCH 727965 50 mg/m2每3周静脉注射一次,直至病情进展。共同主要终点为1年总生存期(OS)和6个月无进展生存期(PFS):从 2009 年 7 月 1 日到 2010 年 11 月 1 日,24 家机构共招募了 72 名患者。68%的患者患有M1c疾病,43%的患者乳酸脱氢酶水平升高。28名患者(39%)出现了4级不良反应,其中包括20例中性粒细胞减少症。67名患者可进行反应评估。67例患者中0例有反应(95%置信区间[CI],0%-5%),21%的患者病情稳定。估计中位 PFS 为 1.4 个月(95% 置信区间 [CI],1.4-1.5 个月),6 个月 PFS 率为 6%(2%-13%)。中位OS为8.2个月(95% CI,5.5-10.5个月),1年OS率为38%(95% CI,26%-49%):这项由美国国立癌症研究所癌症治疗评估项目赞助的SCH 727965多中心试验是在新一代黑色素瘤有效疗法尚未问世时进行的。虽然1年OS的零假设被否定,但PFS的影响极小,毒性也很大,这表明该方案作为单药缺乏进一步研究的理由。
{"title":"Southwest Oncology Group S0826: A phase 2 trial of SCH 727965 (NSC 727135, dinaciclib) in patients with stage IV melanoma.","authors":"Christopher D Lao, James Moon, Vincent T Ma, John P Fruehauf, Lawrence E Flaherty, Martin J Bury, William G Martin, Howard Gross, Wallace Akerley, Judith O Hopkins, Sapna P Patel, Vernon K Sondak, Antoni Ribas","doi":"10.1002/cncr.35587","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.35587","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cell cycle inhibition is an established therapeutic approach for some cancers. A multicenter, single-arm, phase 2 trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00937937) of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor SCH 727965 (NSC 747135; dinaciclib) was conducted in patients with metastatic melanoma to determine its clinical activity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with metastatic melanoma of cutaneous or mucosal origin were eligible if they had zero to one previous treatments, a Zubrod performance status of 0-1, and adequate organ function. SCH 727965 50 mg/m<sup>2</sup> was given intravenously every 3 weeks until progression. Co-primary end points were 1-year overall survival (OS) and 6-month progression-free survival (PFS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-two patients were enrolled from July 1, 2009, to November 1, 2010, at 24 institutions. Sixty-eight percent of patients had M1c disease, and 43% had elevated lactate dehydrogenase levels. Twenty-eight patients (39%) experienced grade 4 adverse events, including 20 cases of neutropenia. Sixty-seven patients were evaluable for response. There was a response in zero of 67 patients (95% confidence interval [CI], 0%-5%), and stable disease was observed in 21%. The estimated median PFS was 1.4 months (95% CI, 1.4-1.5 months), and the 6-month PFS rate was 6% (2%-13%). The median OS was 8.2 months (95% CI, 5.5-10.5 months), and the 1-year OS rate was 38% (95% CI, 26%-49%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This multicenter, US National Cancer Institute Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program-sponsored trial of SCH 727965 was conducted at a time when the current generation of effective therapies for melanoma were not available. Although the null hypothesis of 1-year OS was rejected, the minimal PFS impact and substantive toxicity indicated that this regimen lacks justification for further investigation as a single agent.</p>","PeriodicalId":138,"journal":{"name":"Cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2024-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142337741","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Does insulin resistance predict prostate cancer? Results from the Reduction by Dutasteride of Prostate Cancer (REDUCE) Trial. 胰岛素抵抗能否预测前列腺癌?通过度他雄胺降低前列腺癌发病率(REDUCE)试验的结果。
IF 6.1 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-27 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.35568
Renning Zheng, James P Daniels, Daniel M Moreira, Shakiba Eslamimehr, Alexis R Freedland, Lourdes Guerrios-Rivera, Jay H Fowke, Stephen J Freedland

Purpose: Prior studies testing the association between insulin resistance (IR) and prostate cancer (PC) risk are inconsistent. We examined the association between Homeostatic Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR; calculated from fasting baseline insulin and glucose) and PC in REDUCE, a 4-year randomized trial of dutasteride vs. placebo for PC prevention.

Experimental design: All patients had prestudy negative biopsies and underwent study mandated biopsies at 2 and 4 years regardless of prostate-specific antigen. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to investigate the associations between log-transformed or categorized HOMA-IR scores and PC risk. Multinominal regression was used to assess associations between HOMA-IR scores and tumor grade (low grade [grade group 1]; high-grade [grade groups 2-5]).

Results: Among 5430 REDUCE participants (1212 with PC; 856 low- and 356 high-grade), higher HOMA-IR was associated with lower PC risk (log-HOMA-IR: OR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.80-0.99; p = .03; categorized HOMA-IR: p-trend = .04). When stratified by grade, HOMA-IR was significantly associated with reduced low-grade PC risk (log-HOMA-IR: OR, 0.84; 95% CI , 0.74-0.94; p = .003; categorized HOMA-IR: p-trend = .002) but was unrelated to high-grade PC (log-HOMA-IR: OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.86-1.21; p = .81; categorized HOMA-IR: p-trend = .26). Results were similar in placebo and treatment arms.

Conclusions: In summary, higher HOMA-IR was associated with a reduced risk of low-grade PC but was not associated with high-grade disease. The mechanisms to explain these findings are unclear.

目的:之前测试胰岛素抵抗(IR)与前列腺癌(PC)风险之间关系的研究结果并不一致。我们研究了胰岛素抵抗静态评估(HOMA-IR,根据空腹基线胰岛素和葡萄糖计算)与 REDUCE 中 PC 之间的关系,REDUCE 是一项为期 4 年的预防 PC 的度他雄胺与安慰剂的随机试验:实验设计:所有患者的研究前活检结果均为阴性,且无论前列腺特异性抗原情况如何,均在 2 年和 4 年时接受研究要求的活检。多变量逻辑回归模型用于研究对数变换或分类 HOMA-IR 评分与 PC 风险之间的关系。多项式回归用于评估HOMA-IR评分与肿瘤分级(低级别[1级组];高级别[2-5级组])之间的关系:在5430名REDUCE参与者中(1212名PC患者;856名低度患者和356名高级别患者),较高的HOMA-IR与较低的PC风险相关(log-HOMA-IR:OR,0.89;95% CI,0.80-0.99;p = .03;分类HOMA-IR:p趋势 = .04)。按级别分层时,HOMA-IR 与低级别 PC 风险降低显著相关(log-HOMA-IR:OR,0.84;95% CI ,0.74-0.94;p = .003;分类 HOMA-IR:p 趋势 = .002),但与高级别 PC 无关(log-HOMA-IR:OR,1.02;95% CI,0.86-1.21;p = .81;分类 HOMA-IR:p 趋势 = .26)。安慰剂组和治疗组的结果相似:总之,较高的 HOMA-IR 与低级别 PC 风险降低有关,但与高级别疾病无关。解释这些发现的机制尚不清楚。
{"title":"Does insulin resistance predict prostate cancer? Results from the Reduction by Dutasteride of Prostate Cancer (REDUCE) Trial.","authors":"Renning Zheng, James P Daniels, Daniel M Moreira, Shakiba Eslamimehr, Alexis R Freedland, Lourdes Guerrios-Rivera, Jay H Fowke, Stephen J Freedland","doi":"10.1002/cncr.35568","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.35568","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Prior studies testing the association between insulin resistance (IR) and prostate cancer (PC) risk are inconsistent. We examined the association between Homeostatic Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR; calculated from fasting baseline insulin and glucose) and PC in REDUCE, a 4-year randomized trial of dutasteride vs. placebo for PC prevention.</p><p><strong>Experimental design: </strong>All patients had prestudy negative biopsies and underwent study mandated biopsies at 2 and 4 years regardless of prostate-specific antigen. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to investigate the associations between log-transformed or categorized HOMA-IR scores and PC risk. Multinominal regression was used to assess associations between HOMA-IR scores and tumor grade (low grade [grade group 1]; high-grade [grade groups 2-5]).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 5430 REDUCE participants (1212 with PC; 856 low- and 356 high-grade), higher HOMA-IR was associated with lower PC risk (log-HOMA-IR: OR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.80-0.99; p = .03; categorized HOMA-IR: p-trend = .04). When stratified by grade, HOMA-IR was significantly associated with reduced low-grade PC risk (log-HOMA-IR: OR, 0.84; 95% CI , 0.74-0.94; p = .003; categorized HOMA-IR: p-trend = .002) but was unrelated to high-grade PC (log-HOMA-IR: OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.86-1.21; p = .81; categorized HOMA-IR: p-trend = .26). Results were similar in placebo and treatment arms.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In summary, higher HOMA-IR was associated with a reduced risk of low-grade PC but was not associated with high-grade disease. The mechanisms to explain these findings are unclear.</p>","PeriodicalId":138,"journal":{"name":"Cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142337740","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Androgen receptor signaling inhibitors linked to increased risk of cardiovascular adverse events in prostate cancer 雄激素受体信号抑制剂与前列腺癌患者心血管不良事件风险增加有关
IF 6.1 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-26 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.35555
Mary Beth Nierengarten
<p>Men with advanced prostate cancer treated with the addition of androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSIs) to traditional treatment with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) have a 2-fold increased risk of developing an adverse cardiovascular (CV) event compared with those receiving ADT treatment alone according to the results of a meta-analysis published in <i>JAMA Oncology</i>.<span><sup>1</sup></span></p><p>That risk increases to 4-fold for developing grade 3 or higher CV events when ARSI doublet therapy, specifically abiraterone acetate and enzalutamide, is added to ADT. These risk increases were seen across the full spectrum of advanced prostate cancer, from nonmetastatic hormone-sensitive disease through metastatic castrate-resistant disease.</p><p>“The addition of androgen receptor signaling inhibitors to conventional hormone therapy has dramatically improved survival for prostate cancer patients,” says the senior author of the study, Ashwin Sachdeva, MBBS, PhD, National Institute for Health and Care Research Academic Clinical Lecturer in Urology at the University of Manchester. “However, we found that these treatments may also increase the risk of cardiovascular events.”</p><p>The meta-analysis included 24 studies of more than 22,000 patients with advanced prostate cancer treated with ADT intensification with ARSIs (abiraterone, apalutamide, darolutamide, and enzalutamide).</p><p>Secondary analyses showed that ARSIs also were linked to an increased risk of grade 3 or higher hypertension, cardiac dysrhythmia, and cerebrovascular events as well as a 2-fold increased risk of CV-related death (i.e., a grade 5 CV event).</p><p>Dr Sachdeva says that the findings underscore the need for urologists and oncologists to counsel patients on the potential risks of ARSIs and to ensure that CV risk factors are closely monitored and optimized in conjunction with the wider interdisciplinary team (i.e., primary care physicians and cardio-oncologists) when appropriate. “Simple measures such as improved management of co-morbidities, such as hypertension and diabetes, and use of lifestyle interventions may potentially help mitigate such risks,” he says.</p><p>In an editorial accompanying the study, Katelyn M. Atkins, MD, PhD, a radiation oncologist, and Andriana P. Nikolova, MD, PhD, an assistant professor of cardiology, both at Cedars–Sinai Medical Center in Los Angeles, California, say that the findings are a “call to action” to the medical community and a challenge “to re-examine the current CV risk estimation models which omit active cancer and certain cancer therapeutics as potent CV risk modifiers.”<span><sup>2</sup></span> They urge physicians overseeing prostate cancer survivors who are receiving ARSIs and ADT therapies to spread awareness of the heightened CV risk in these patients and underscore that the risk can be mitigated through appropriate screening.</p><p>To that end, they recommend a baseline CV risk assessment, repeated annually, for pa
根据发表在《美国医学会杂志-肿瘤学》(JAMA Oncology)上的一项荟萃分析结果,在传统的雄激素剥夺疗法(ADT)基础上加用雄激素受体信号转导抑制剂(ARSI)治疗的晚期前列腺癌患者发生不良心血管(CV)事件的风险比单独接受ADT治疗的患者增加了2倍。这项研究的资深作者、曼彻斯特大学国家健康与护理研究所泌尿学学术临床讲师、医学博士Ashwin Sachdeva说:"在传统激素疗法中加入雄激素受体信号抑制剂,大大提高了前列腺癌患者的生存率。"然而,我们发现这些治疗方法也可能会增加心血管事件的风险。"荟萃分析包括24项研究,对22000多名晚期前列腺癌患者进行了ADT强化治疗,并使用了ARSIs(阿比特龙、阿帕鲁胺、达罗鲁胺和恩扎鲁胺)。二次分析表明,ARSIs 还与 3 级或以上高血压、心律失常和脑血管事件风险增加以及心血管相关死亡风险增加 2 倍(即 5 级心血管事件)有关、Sachdeva博士说,这些发现强调了泌尿科和肿瘤科医生有必要就ARSIs的潜在风险向患者提供咨询,并确保在适当的时候与更广泛的跨学科团队(即初级保健医生和心脏肿瘤科医生)一起密切监测和优化心血管风险因素。"他说:"一些简单的措施,如改善对高血压和糖尿病等并发症的管理,以及使用生活方式干预措施,都可能有助于降低这些风险。在随研究发表的一篇社论中,放射肿瘤学家 Katelyn M. Atkins 博士和 Andriana P. Nikolova 博士分别发表了自己的看法。在该研究的社论中,放射肿瘤学家 Katelyn M. Atkins 博士和加利福尼亚州洛杉矶雪松-西奈医学中心的心脏病学助理教授 Andriana P. Nikolova 博士说,研究结果是对医学界的 "行动呼吁",也是对 "重新审视当前心血管风险评估模型 "的挑战。"2他们敦促负责管理接受ARSIs和ADT治疗的前列腺癌幸存者的医生宣传这些患者的心血管风险增高,并强调可以通过适当的筛查来降低风险。为此,他们建议对前列腺癌患者进行基线心血管风险评估,每年重复一次。对于罹患心血管疾病风险较高的患者(即年龄大于 60 岁且至少有一个心血管疾病风险因素,或年龄小于 60 岁且有两个或两个以上心血管疾病风险因素,或有动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病家族史),他们建议由包括心脏病专家或心脏肿瘤专家在内的团队进行全面的心血管疾病风险评估和管理。他们还建议尽早持续实施指南指导的心血管疾病风险缓解策略,包括他汀类药物治疗、积极控制血压、有益心脏健康的饮食和定期锻炼。
{"title":"Androgen receptor signaling inhibitors linked to increased risk of cardiovascular adverse events in prostate cancer","authors":"Mary Beth Nierengarten","doi":"10.1002/cncr.35555","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.35555","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;Men with advanced prostate cancer treated with the addition of androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSIs) to traditional treatment with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) have a 2-fold increased risk of developing an adverse cardiovascular (CV) event compared with those receiving ADT treatment alone according to the results of a meta-analysis published in &lt;i&gt;JAMA Oncology&lt;/i&gt;.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;1&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;That risk increases to 4-fold for developing grade 3 or higher CV events when ARSI doublet therapy, specifically abiraterone acetate and enzalutamide, is added to ADT. These risk increases were seen across the full spectrum of advanced prostate cancer, from nonmetastatic hormone-sensitive disease through metastatic castrate-resistant disease.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;“The addition of androgen receptor signaling inhibitors to conventional hormone therapy has dramatically improved survival for prostate cancer patients,” says the senior author of the study, Ashwin Sachdeva, MBBS, PhD, National Institute for Health and Care Research Academic Clinical Lecturer in Urology at the University of Manchester. “However, we found that these treatments may also increase the risk of cardiovascular events.”&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The meta-analysis included 24 studies of more than 22,000 patients with advanced prostate cancer treated with ADT intensification with ARSIs (abiraterone, apalutamide, darolutamide, and enzalutamide).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Secondary analyses showed that ARSIs also were linked to an increased risk of grade 3 or higher hypertension, cardiac dysrhythmia, and cerebrovascular events as well as a 2-fold increased risk of CV-related death (i.e., a grade 5 CV event).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Dr Sachdeva says that the findings underscore the need for urologists and oncologists to counsel patients on the potential risks of ARSIs and to ensure that CV risk factors are closely monitored and optimized in conjunction with the wider interdisciplinary team (i.e., primary care physicians and cardio-oncologists) when appropriate. “Simple measures such as improved management of co-morbidities, such as hypertension and diabetes, and use of lifestyle interventions may potentially help mitigate such risks,” he says.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In an editorial accompanying the study, Katelyn M. Atkins, MD, PhD, a radiation oncologist, and Andriana P. Nikolova, MD, PhD, an assistant professor of cardiology, both at Cedars–Sinai Medical Center in Los Angeles, California, say that the findings are a “call to action” to the medical community and a challenge “to re-examine the current CV risk estimation models which omit active cancer and certain cancer therapeutics as potent CV risk modifiers.”&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; They urge physicians overseeing prostate cancer survivors who are receiving ARSIs and ADT therapies to spread awareness of the heightened CV risk in these patients and underscore that the risk can be mitigated through appropriate screening.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;To that end, they recommend a baseline CV risk assessment, repeated annually, for pa","PeriodicalId":138,"journal":{"name":"Cancer","volume":"130 20","pages":"3399"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cncr.35555","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142328498","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
First person profile: Eileen M. O’Reilly, MD 第一人简介:Eileen M. O'Reilly, MD
IF 6.1 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-26 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.35554
Mary Beth Nierengarten
<p>Eileen M. O’Reilly, MD, has devoted her career to developing therapeutics for one of the most challenging and difficult diseases to treat: pancreatic cancer. Although advancements in treatments for many cancers have dramatically improved outcomes, pancreatic cancer remains among those for which effective treatments have lagged with few new therapeutic options.</p><p>However, that is changing. Research led by Dr O’Reilly, who holds the Winthrop Endowed Chair in Medical Oncology at Memorial Sloan Kettering (MSK) Cancer Center, has resulted in the first new therapy in more than a decade for treatment-naïve metastatic pancreatic cancer. In February 2024, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved NALIRIFOX (irinotecan liposome, oxaliplatin, 5-fluouroracil, and leucovorin) for the frontline treatment of metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma over the standard of care based on the results of the NAPOLI-3 trial.<span><sup>1, 2</sup></span></p><p>That is but one success story in Dr O’Reilly’s journey as a medical oncologist clinician–scientist. Her team defined the use of platinum-based therapy for <i>BRCA</i>-related pancreatic cancer based on the National Cancer Institute’s (NCI’s)–funded research,<span><sup>3</sup></span> and this led to the updating of national guidelines. Applying what was known about the tumor-based genetics of pancreatic cancer, she also was involved in the early drug development of poly(adenosine diphosphate ribose) polymerase inhibitors as maintenance treatment for pancreatic cancer. She was a coauthor of the landmark phase 3 POLO study, which showed the superiority of olaparib over the standard of care as maintenance therapy for patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer with germline BRCA mutations and led to its FDA approval in 2019.<span><sup>4, 5</sup></span></p><p>Building on her work on the tumor-based genetics of pancreatic cancer, Dr O’Reilly is particularly excited about developments in KRAS-based therapeutics. Although it has been known for a long time that the <i>KRAS</i> gene is ubiquitous in pancreatic cancer, targeting it has been seen as actionable only recently, she says. Multiple drugs are currently in development and moving into phase 3 trials, she adds, and it is expected that this class of drugs will change outcomes in this disease.</p><p>Currently, working with her colleagues at MSK Cancer Center and collaborating with investigators at other institutions, Dr O’Reilly is focusing much of her research on the development of vaccines against pancreatic and other gastrointestinal cancers. Her ongoing research is aimed at two types of vaccines: new personalized antigen messenger RNA vaccines with systemic treatments (on which she and her MSK colleague, Vinod Balachandran, MD, are collaborating) and off-the-shelf KRAS-directed vaccines following standard adjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer. Recently, she and her colleagues published preliminary evidence on the safety and efficacy of a KRAS-specific vac
艾琳-M.-奥莱利(Eileen M. O'Reilly)医学博士的职业生涯致力于开发治疗最具挑战性、最难治疗的疾病之一--胰腺癌的疗法。尽管许多癌症的治疗方法都有了长足的进步,但胰腺癌的治疗仍然落后,几乎没有新的治疗方法可供选择。在纪念斯隆-凯特琳癌症中心(MSK)担任温斯洛普捐赠肿瘤内科主席的奥莱利博士领导的研究,十多年来首次为治疗无效的转移性胰腺癌提供了新疗法。2024 年 2 月,美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)根据 NAPOLI-3 试验的结果,批准 NALIRIFOX(伊立替康脂质体、奥沙利铂、5-氟尿嘧啶和白消安)用于转移性胰腺腺癌的一线治疗,优于标准疗法。她的团队根据美国国家癌症研究所(NCI)资助的研究3,确定了对 BRCA 相关性胰腺癌使用铂类药物治疗的方法,并由此更新了国家指南。根据对胰腺癌肿瘤遗传学的了解,她还参与了聚二磷酸腺苷核糖聚合酶抑制剂作为胰腺癌维持治疗药物的早期开发。她是具有里程碑意义的 3 期 POLO 研究的共同作者之一,该研究表明奥拉帕利作为具有种系 BRCA 基因突变的转移性胰腺癌患者的维持治疗药物优于标准疗法,并促使该药物于 2019 年获得美国食品药品管理局的批准。她说,虽然人们很早就知道 KRAS 基因在胰腺癌中无处不在,但将其作为靶点直到最近才被认为是可行的。目前,O'Reilly 博士与她在 MSK 癌症中心的同事合作,并与其他机构的研究人员合作,她的研究重点主要是开发针对胰腺癌和其他胃肠道癌症的疫苗。她正在进行的研究主要针对两类疫苗:新型个性化抗原信使 RNA 疫苗与全身治疗(她和她的 MSK 同事 Vinod Balachandran 医学博士正在合作研究),以及在胰腺癌标准佐剂治疗后使用现成的 KRAS 导向疫苗。最近,她和同事们公布了 KRAS 特异性疫苗在诱导免疫疗法复发的 KRAS 突变肿瘤患者的 T 细胞应答方面的安全性和有效性的初步证据。6 O'Reilly 博士的爱尔兰血统从她的名字中可见一斑,从她可爱的轻柔的口音中可听一听,从她成长为 "骄傲的都柏林人 "的深切感受中也可感受到。在都柏林,她在圣三一学院获得了医学学位,并在圣文森特医院完成了内科住院医师培训和肿瘤内科的第一份奖学金。她与肿瘤学家彼得-戴利(Peter Daly)医学博士和约翰-克朗(John Crown)医学博士共事,后者鼓励她在MSK癌症中心攻读肿瘤内科学研究员。O'Reilly博士是MSK胰腺肿瘤卓越研究专项计划的主要研究员,该计划是目前美国三项由NCI资助的胰腺癌团队科学基金之一。在 MSK 癌症中心的其他行政职务中,她还担任胃肠肿瘤服务部肝胰胆管/神经内分泌癌症科主任、大卫-鲁宾斯坦胰腺癌中心(David M. Rubenstein Center for Pancreatic Cancer)医疗计划联合主任以及人类研究保护计划和机构审查委员会主席。她还是 MSK 癌症中心的主治医师和威尔康奈尔医学院的医学教授。O'Reilly 博士还担任《临床肿瘤学杂志》(美国临床肿瘤学会)的副编辑、《癌症研究通讯》(美国癌症研究协会)临床试验高级编辑和《肿瘤学家》胃肠道癌症编辑。她发表了数百篇文章、社论和书籍章节。O'Reilly 博士获得了众多奖项和荣誉,其中包括伯基特奖章(2022 年),她对此尤为自豪。
{"title":"First person profile: Eileen M. O’Reilly, MD","authors":"Mary Beth Nierengarten","doi":"10.1002/cncr.35554","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.35554","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;Eileen M. O’Reilly, MD, has devoted her career to developing therapeutics for one of the most challenging and difficult diseases to treat: pancreatic cancer. Although advancements in treatments for many cancers have dramatically improved outcomes, pancreatic cancer remains among those for which effective treatments have lagged with few new therapeutic options.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;However, that is changing. Research led by Dr O’Reilly, who holds the Winthrop Endowed Chair in Medical Oncology at Memorial Sloan Kettering (MSK) Cancer Center, has resulted in the first new therapy in more than a decade for treatment-naïve metastatic pancreatic cancer. In February 2024, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved NALIRIFOX (irinotecan liposome, oxaliplatin, 5-fluouroracil, and leucovorin) for the frontline treatment of metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma over the standard of care based on the results of the NAPOLI-3 trial.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;1, 2&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;That is but one success story in Dr O’Reilly’s journey as a medical oncologist clinician–scientist. Her team defined the use of platinum-based therapy for &lt;i&gt;BRCA&lt;/i&gt;-related pancreatic cancer based on the National Cancer Institute’s (NCI’s)–funded research,&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;3&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; and this led to the updating of national guidelines. Applying what was known about the tumor-based genetics of pancreatic cancer, she also was involved in the early drug development of poly(adenosine diphosphate ribose) polymerase inhibitors as maintenance treatment for pancreatic cancer. She was a coauthor of the landmark phase 3 POLO study, which showed the superiority of olaparib over the standard of care as maintenance therapy for patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer with germline BRCA mutations and led to its FDA approval in 2019.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;4, 5&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Building on her work on the tumor-based genetics of pancreatic cancer, Dr O’Reilly is particularly excited about developments in KRAS-based therapeutics. Although it has been known for a long time that the &lt;i&gt;KRAS&lt;/i&gt; gene is ubiquitous in pancreatic cancer, targeting it has been seen as actionable only recently, she says. Multiple drugs are currently in development and moving into phase 3 trials, she adds, and it is expected that this class of drugs will change outcomes in this disease.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Currently, working with her colleagues at MSK Cancer Center and collaborating with investigators at other institutions, Dr O’Reilly is focusing much of her research on the development of vaccines against pancreatic and other gastrointestinal cancers. Her ongoing research is aimed at two types of vaccines: new personalized antigen messenger RNA vaccines with systemic treatments (on which she and her MSK colleague, Vinod Balachandran, MD, are collaborating) and off-the-shelf KRAS-directed vaccines following standard adjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer. Recently, she and her colleagues published preliminary evidence on the safety and efficacy of a KRAS-specific vac","PeriodicalId":138,"journal":{"name":"Cancer","volume":"130 20","pages":"3398"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cncr.35554","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142328504","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Excellent outcomes with radiation alone for localized recurrences of endometrial cancer 单纯放射治疗子宫内膜癌局部复发效果极佳
IF 6.1 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-26 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.35556
Mary Beth Nierengarten

The addition of chemotherapy to radiation therapy for patients with localized recurrences of endometrial cancer does not improve survival outcomes and increases toxicity according to a prospective, randomized study published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.1

Although concurrent chemotherapy and radiation are widely used to treat other gynecologic cancers such as cervical cancer, the benefit of adding chemotherapy to radiation for patients with endometrial recurrences localized to the pelvis has not been evaluated.

This study was conducted to fill that gap. The study included 165 patients randomized 1:1 to receive radiation alone or a combination of cisplatin and radiation. Most patients had low-grade tumors with endometrioid histology (82%) with recurrences confined to the vagina with or without pelvic lymph node involvement (86%). All patients received initial external-beam radiation therapy to the whole pelvis (4500 cGy in 25 fractions), which was followed by a boost of either brachytherapy or external-beam therapy according to the extent of disease recurrence. Patients in the concurrent chemotherapy/radiation arm received cisplatin (40 mg/m2) once weekly for five cycles.

At a median follow-up of 62 months, no significant difference was seen in progression-free survival between the two treatment arms, as demonstrated by a hazard ratio of 1.25 (95% CI, 0.75–2.07). Patients treated with concurrent chemotherapy and radiation had a higher rate of grade 3 toxicity (57% vs. 31% with radiation alone).

At 3 years, 73% of patients treated with radiation alone were free from disease progression, whereas 62% of patients treated with concurrent chemotherapy and radiation were.

“Patients with localized recurrences of endometrial cancer can be treated with radiation alone, especially patients who have low-grade vaginal recurrences, which was the most common presentation for patients in the study,” says the lead author of the study, Ann Klopp, MD, PhD, professor of radiation oncology at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center.

She underscores that the high survival rate seen with radiation alone highlights the importance of detecting recurrences of endometrial cancer localized to the pelvis “and treating them curatively with radiation, including brachytherapy.”

Dr Klopp and her colleagues adopted principles of image-guided brachytherapy in cervical cancer to inform the use of brachytherapy in the study and noted that in the future, magnetic resonance imaging–guided adaptive brachytherapy, which has improved local control rates for recurrences in cervical cancer, also may improve them for recurrences in endometrial cancer.

根据发表在《临床肿瘤学杂志》(Journal of Clinical Oncology)上的一项前瞻性随机研究,对局部复发的子宫内膜癌患者在放疗的基础上加用化疗并不能提高生存率,反而会增加毒性1 。这项研究包括165名患者,他们按1:1的比例随机接受单纯放疗或顺铂和放疗联合治疗。大多数患者为子宫内膜样组织学低级别肿瘤(82%),复发局限于阴道,盆腔淋巴结受累或未受累(86%)。所有患者最初都接受了整个盆腔的体外放射治疗(4500 cGy,25次分次放疗),随后根据疾病复发程度接受近距离放射治疗或体外放射治疗。中位随访时间为62个月,两组患者的无进展生存期无明显差异,危险比为1.25(95% CI,0.75-2.07)。同时接受化疗和放疗的患者出现3级毒性的比例较高(57%对31%)。3年后,73%单独接受放疗的患者无疾病进展,而62%同时接受化疗和放疗的患者无疾病进展。"这项研究的主要作者、德克萨斯大学 MD 安德森癌症中心放射肿瘤学教授、医学博士 Ann Klopp 说:"子宫内膜癌局部复发患者可以只接受放射治疗,尤其是低级别阴道复发患者,这是本研究中患者最常见的表现。她强调说,单纯放射治疗的高生存率凸显了检测盆腔局部子宫内膜癌复发 "并通过放射治疗(包括近距离放射治疗)进行根治性治疗 "的重要性。"Klopp博士和她的同事采用了宫颈癌图像引导近距离放射治疗的原则来指导该研究中近距离放射治疗的使用,并指出,磁共振成像引导的适应性近距离放射治疗提高了宫颈癌复发的局部控制率,将来也可能提高子宫内膜癌复发的局部控制率。
{"title":"Excellent outcomes with radiation alone for localized recurrences of endometrial cancer","authors":"Mary Beth Nierengarten","doi":"10.1002/cncr.35556","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.35556","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The addition of chemotherapy to radiation therapy for patients with localized recurrences of endometrial cancer does not improve survival outcomes and increases toxicity according to a prospective, randomized study published in the <i>Journal of Clinical Oncology</i>.<span><sup>1</sup></span></p><p>Although concurrent chemotherapy and radiation are widely used to treat other gynecologic cancers such as cervical cancer, the benefit of adding chemotherapy to radiation for patients with endometrial recurrences localized to the pelvis has not been evaluated.</p><p>This study was conducted to fill that gap. The study included 165 patients randomized 1:1 to receive radiation alone or a combination of cisplatin and radiation. Most patients had low-grade tumors with endometrioid histology (82%) with recurrences confined to the vagina with or without pelvic lymph node involvement (86%). All patients received initial external-beam radiation therapy to the whole pelvis (4500 cGy in 25 fractions), which was followed by a boost of either brachytherapy or external-beam therapy according to the extent of disease recurrence. Patients in the concurrent chemotherapy/radiation arm received cisplatin (40 mg/m<sup>2</sup>) once weekly for five cycles.</p><p>At a median follow-up of 62 months, no significant difference was seen in progression-free survival between the two treatment arms, as demonstrated by a hazard ratio of 1.25 (95% CI, 0.75–2.07). Patients treated with concurrent chemotherapy and radiation had a higher rate of grade 3 toxicity (57% vs. 31% with radiation alone).</p><p>At 3 years, 73% of patients treated with radiation alone were free from disease progression, whereas 62% of patients treated with concurrent chemotherapy and radiation were.</p><p>“Patients with localized recurrences of endometrial cancer can be treated with radiation alone, especially patients who have low-grade vaginal recurrences, which was the most common presentation for patients in the study,” says the lead author of the study, Ann Klopp, MD, PhD, professor of radiation oncology at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center.</p><p>She underscores that the high survival rate seen with radiation alone highlights the importance of detecting recurrences of endometrial cancer localized to the pelvis “and treating them curatively with radiation, including brachytherapy.”</p><p>Dr Klopp and her colleagues adopted principles of image-guided brachytherapy in cervical cancer to inform the use of brachytherapy in the study and noted that in the future, magnetic resonance imaging–guided adaptive brachytherapy, which has improved local control rates for recurrences in cervical cancer, also may improve them for recurrences in endometrial cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":138,"journal":{"name":"Cancer","volume":"130 20","pages":"3400"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cncr.35556","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142328497","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Cardiovascular disease and stroke following cancer and cancer treatment in older adults 老年人癌症和癌症治疗后的心血管疾病和中风。
IF 6.1 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-23 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.35503
Jaidyn Muhandiramge BMedSc(Hons), MD, John R. Zalcberg MBBS, PhD, Erica T. Warner ScD, MPH, Galina Polekhina PhD, Peter Gibbs MBBS, MD, G. J. van Londen MD, MS, Wendy B. Bernstein MD, Finlay Macrae MBBS, MD, Andrew Haydon MBBS, PhD, Jeanne Tie MBChB, MD, Jeremy L. Millar MBChB, BMedSc, Victoria J. Mar MBBS, PhD, Lucy Gately MBBS, PhD, Andrew Tonkin MBBS, MD, Leslie Ford MD, Asad Umar DVM, PhD, Andrew T. Chan MD, MPH, Robyn L. Woods BSc(Hons), PhD, Suzanne G. Orchard BSc(Hons), PhD

Background

Cancer survivors can be at risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) because of either their malignancy or its treatment. Although studies linking cancer and CVD exist, few examine risk in older adults, the impact of cancer treatment, or the effect of aspirin on reducing risk in this cohort.

Methods

The authors conducted a secondary analysis of the Aspirin in Reducing Events in the Elderly (ASPREE) trial to investigate the impact of cancer and cancer treatment on a composite CVD end point comprising hospitalization for heart failure (HHF), myocardial infarction (MI), and stroke.

Results

Of 15,454 Australian and US ASPREE participants, 1392 had an incident cancer diagnosis. Rates of CVD were greater in the cancer risk-set compared to the cancer-free risk-set (20.8 vs. 10.3 events per 1000 person-years; incidence rate ratio, 2.03; 95% confidence interval, 1.51–2.66), with increased incidence seen across MI, HHF, overall stroke, and ischemic stroke. Increased incidence remained after adjustment for clinically significant risk factors for CVD. Incidence was greatest in metastatic, hematological, and lung cancer. Chemotherapy was associated with increased risk of CVD. Similar rates of CVD were seen across aspirin and placebo groups.

Conclusions

Incidence of CVD, including MI, HHF, and ischemic stroke, was increased in older adults with cancer. Aspirin did not impact CVD incidence. Risk may be higher in those with metastatic, hematological, and lung cancer, and following chemotherapy.

背景:癌症幸存者可能因恶性肿瘤或治疗而面临心血管疾病(CVD)风险。尽管存在将癌症和心血管疾病联系起来的研究,但很少有研究探讨老年人的风险、癌症治疗的影响或阿司匹林对降低该人群风险的作用:作者对阿司匹林减少老年人心血管事件(ASPREE)试验进行了二次分析,研究癌症和癌症治疗对心血管疾病综合终点(包括心力衰竭(HHF)住院、心肌梗死(MI)和中风)的影响:在 15454 名澳大利亚和美国 ASPREE 参与者中,有 1392 人被诊断为癌症。与无癌症风险组相比,癌症风险组的心血管疾病发病率更高(每千人年20.8例 vs. 10.3例;发病率比为2.03;95%置信区间为1.51-2.66),心肌梗死、HHF、总体中风和缺血性中风的发病率均有所上升。在对心血管疾病的临床重要风险因素进行调整后,发病率仍会增加。转移癌、血癌和肺癌的发病率最高。化疗与心血管疾病风险增加有关。阿司匹林组和安慰剂组的心血管疾病发病率相似:结论:患有癌症的老年人心血管疾病(包括心肌梗死、HHF 和缺血性中风)的发病率增加。阿司匹林不会影响心血管疾病的发病率。转移癌、血癌、肺癌患者和化疗后患者的风险可能更高。
{"title":"Cardiovascular disease and stroke following cancer and cancer treatment in older adults","authors":"Jaidyn Muhandiramge BMedSc(Hons), MD,&nbsp;John R. Zalcberg MBBS, PhD,&nbsp;Erica T. Warner ScD, MPH,&nbsp;Galina Polekhina PhD,&nbsp;Peter Gibbs MBBS, MD,&nbsp;G. J. van Londen MD, MS,&nbsp;Wendy B. Bernstein MD,&nbsp;Finlay Macrae MBBS, MD,&nbsp;Andrew Haydon MBBS, PhD,&nbsp;Jeanne Tie MBChB, MD,&nbsp;Jeremy L. Millar MBChB, BMedSc,&nbsp;Victoria J. Mar MBBS, PhD,&nbsp;Lucy Gately MBBS, PhD,&nbsp;Andrew Tonkin MBBS, MD,&nbsp;Leslie Ford MD,&nbsp;Asad Umar DVM, PhD,&nbsp;Andrew T. Chan MD, MPH,&nbsp;Robyn L. Woods BSc(Hons), PhD,&nbsp;Suzanne G. Orchard BSc(Hons), PhD","doi":"10.1002/cncr.35503","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cncr.35503","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Cancer survivors can be at risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) because of either their malignancy or its treatment. Although studies linking cancer and CVD exist, few examine risk in older adults, the impact of cancer treatment, or the effect of aspirin on reducing risk in this cohort.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The authors conducted a secondary analysis of the Aspirin in Reducing Events in the Elderly (ASPREE) trial to investigate the impact of cancer and cancer treatment on a composite CVD end point comprising hospitalization for heart failure (HHF), myocardial infarction (MI), and stroke.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Of 15,454 Australian and US ASPREE participants, 1392 had an incident cancer diagnosis. Rates of CVD were greater in the cancer risk-set compared to the cancer-free risk-set (20.8 vs. 10.3 events per 1000 person-years; incidence rate ratio, 2.03; 95% confidence interval, 1.51–2.66), with increased incidence seen across MI, HHF, overall stroke, and ischemic stroke. Increased incidence remained after adjustment for clinically significant risk factors for CVD. Incidence was greatest in metastatic, hematological, and lung cancer. Chemotherapy was associated with increased risk of CVD. Similar rates of CVD were seen across aspirin and placebo groups.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Incidence of CVD, including MI, HHF, and ischemic stroke, was increased in older adults with cancer. Aspirin did not impact CVD incidence. Risk may be higher in those with metastatic, hematological, and lung cancer, and following chemotherapy.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":138,"journal":{"name":"Cancer","volume":"130 23","pages":"4138-4148"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11560579/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142277517","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Cancer
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1