Pub Date : 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2024.08.007
Shravan Asthana (is Medical Student, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine.), Luis Gago (is Medical Student, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine.), Joshua Garcia (is Medical Student, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine.), Molly Beestrum MLIS (is Head of Research and Information Services, Galter Health Sciences Library & Learning Center, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine.), Teresa Pollack MS, CPHQ (is Director, Quality Operations, Northwestern Medicine, Chicago;), Lori Post PhD (is Professor, Departments of Emergency Medicine and Medical Social Sciences, and Director, Buehler Center for Health Policy and Economics, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine.), Cynthia Barnard PhD, MBA (formerly Vice President, Quality, Northwestern Medicine, is Assistant Professor, Division of General Internal Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine.), Mita Sanghavi Goel MD, MPH, FACP (is Professor, Division of General Internal Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine. Please address correspondence to Mita Sanghavi Goel)
Background
Housing instability in the United States is a critical social determinant of health, influencing health outcomes and health care utilization. This scoping review aimed to analyze literature on US health system screening and response programs addressing housing instability, highlighting methodologies, geographic and demographic variations, and policy implications.
Methods
Adhering to PRISMA-ScR guidelines, the review included studies focusing on US health systems that screen and refer for housing instability. Major scholarly databases, including PubMed and Scopus, were queried. Screening and response program characteristics, methodologies, and outcomes were characterized.
Results
Thirty studies published between 2003 and 2023 were included in this study. Included studies were primarily cross-sectional (26.7%) or quality improvement (20.0%), among 9 other designs. Screening programs were predominantly implemented in academic hospital systems (46.7%) and in the Northeast (63.3%). Of the 25 adult population studies, 68.0% were in outpatient settings, and of the 23 studies providing detailed information on their process, 52.2% used electronic health record entry. Of the 22 studies that describe their screening tool, 15 used institution-specific tools, and only 4 of the remaining 7 studies used identical tools. Of the 20 studies that described their response to positive screenings, 13 provided patients with a paper or electronic referral to a collaborating community partner, while only 6 aided the patient in connecting with community resources.
Conclusion
This study found significant variability in screening and response programs for housing instability among US health care providers. A lack of standardized definitions and methodologies hampers effective comparison and implementation of these programs. Future research should focus on standardizing screening methods and measurement of interventions and outcomes to address housing instability.
{"title":"Housing Instability Screening and Referral Programs: A Scoping Review","authors":"Shravan Asthana (is Medical Student, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine.), Luis Gago (is Medical Student, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine.), Joshua Garcia (is Medical Student, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine.), Molly Beestrum MLIS (is Head of Research and Information Services, Galter Health Sciences Library & Learning Center, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine.), Teresa Pollack MS, CPHQ (is Director, Quality Operations, Northwestern Medicine, Chicago;), Lori Post PhD (is Professor, Departments of Emergency Medicine and Medical Social Sciences, and Director, Buehler Center for Health Policy and Economics, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine.), Cynthia Barnard PhD, MBA (formerly Vice President, Quality, Northwestern Medicine, is Assistant Professor, Division of General Internal Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine.), Mita Sanghavi Goel MD, MPH, FACP (is Professor, Division of General Internal Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine. Please address correspondence to Mita Sanghavi Goel)","doi":"10.1016/j.jcjq.2024.08.007","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jcjq.2024.08.007","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Housing instability in the United States is a critical social determinant of health, influencing health outcomes and health care utilization. This scoping review aimed to analyze literature on US health system screening and response programs addressing housing instability, highlighting methodologies, geographic and demographic variations, and policy implications.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Adhering to PRISMA-ScR guidelines, the review included studies focusing on US health systems that screen and refer for housing instability. Major scholarly databases, including PubMed and Scopus, were queried. Screening and response program characteristics, methodologies, and outcomes were characterized.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Thirty studies published between 2003 and 2023 were included in this study. Included studies were primarily cross-sectional (26.7%) or quality improvement (20.0%), among 9 other designs. Screening programs were predominantly implemented in academic hospital systems (46.7%) and in the Northeast (63.3%). Of the 25 adult population studies, 68.0% were in outpatient settings, and of the 23 studies providing detailed information on their process, 52.2% used electronic health record entry. Of the 22 studies that describe their screening tool, 15 used institution-specific tools, and only 4 of the remaining 7 studies used identical tools. Of the 20 studies that described their response to positive screenings, 13 provided patients with a paper or electronic referral to a collaborating community partner, while only 6 aided the patient in connecting with community resources.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study found significant variability in screening and response programs for housing instability among US health care providers. A lack of standardized definitions and methodologies hampers effective comparison and implementation of these programs. Future research should focus on standardizing screening methods and measurement of interventions and outcomes to address housing instability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14835,"journal":{"name":"Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety","volume":"51 1","pages":"Pages 1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142400262","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2024.10.006
Michael E. Natarus DPT, MBA (is Manager, Improvement Consulting, Center for Quality and Safety, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital, Chicago.), Allison Shaw MPH, MS (is Senior Improvement Consultant, Center for Quality and Safety, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital.), Abbey Studer MBA (is Senior Director, Quality and Safety, Center for Quality and Safety, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital.), Charles Williams CSPDT (is Manager, Sterile Processing Department, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital.), Cherie Dominguez CSPDT (is Lead Resource Coordinator, Sterile Processing Department, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital.), Holdemar Mangual MSIHE, MBA (is Senior Director Strategy Execution, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital.), John Olmstead MSN, MBA (is Senior Director, Surgical and Procedural Services, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital.), Krystal Westmoreland MPS, CSPDT (formerly SPD Educator, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital, is Regional Director, Sterile Processing, Ascension, Chicago.), Tasha Gill MPH (is Manager, Center for Quality and Safety, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital.), W. Zeh Wellington DNP, RN, NE-BC3 (is Director, Surgical and Procedural Services, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital.), Derek S. Wheeler MD, MMM, MBA (is Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital, and Professor of Pediatrics, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine.), Jonathan B. Ida MD, MBA, FACS (is Attending Physician, Division of Pediatric Otolaryngology, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital, and Associate Professor of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine. Please address correspondence to Michael E. Natarus)
Background
Many hospitals and surgery centers have focused improvement efforts on operating room inefficiencies. A common inefficiency is missing and unusable surgical instrumentation, which can result in case delays and decreased effectiveness. Lean Six Sigma methodology, a set of process improvement tools focused on the reduction of waste and variation, has been used to identify and correct root causes of missing and unusable instrumentation.
Methods
An analysis of current operations was performed within the Sterile Processing Department (SPD). The team assessed physical workflows, including decontamination, assembly, sterilization, and sterile storage, as well as digital processes. The team identified five drivers of defects: (1) staffing and training, (2) inventory management, (3) equipment and SPD physical environment, (4) standard workflows and communication, and (5) governance structure. A root cause was established for each driver, and Lean Six Sigma principles were applied. Two metrics were established to assess accuracy and efficiency in the SPD. First pass yield was defined as the proportion of trays processed that were usable after the first cycle. Tray defect rate was defined as the proportion of requested instruments that were missing or unusable.
Results
After implementation, the SPD increased first pass yield from 81.0% to 97.4% (p < 0.001) and reduced the defect rate from 2.2% to < 0.10% (p < 0.001) with sustainment for more than a year.
Conclusion
Application of Lean Six Sigma methodology improved tray accuracy in a hospital's SPD. It is feasible and beneficial to apply improvement methodology developed for manufacturing in the hospital setting to reduce missing and unusable instrumentation.
{"title":"Optimization of a Sterile Processing Department Using Lean Six Sigma Methodology, Staffing Enhancement, and Capital Investment","authors":"Michael E. Natarus DPT, MBA (is Manager, Improvement Consulting, Center for Quality and Safety, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital, Chicago.), Allison Shaw MPH, MS (is Senior Improvement Consultant, Center for Quality and Safety, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital.), Abbey Studer MBA (is Senior Director, Quality and Safety, Center for Quality and Safety, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital.), Charles Williams CSPDT (is Manager, Sterile Processing Department, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital.), Cherie Dominguez CSPDT (is Lead Resource Coordinator, Sterile Processing Department, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital.), Holdemar Mangual MSIHE, MBA (is Senior Director Strategy Execution, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital.), John Olmstead MSN, MBA (is Senior Director, Surgical and Procedural Services, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital.), Krystal Westmoreland MPS, CSPDT (formerly SPD Educator, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital, is Regional Director, Sterile Processing, Ascension, Chicago.), Tasha Gill MPH (is Manager, Center for Quality and Safety, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital.), W. Zeh Wellington DNP, RN, NE-BC3 (is Director, Surgical and Procedural Services, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital.), Derek S. Wheeler MD, MMM, MBA (is Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital, and Professor of Pediatrics, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine.), Jonathan B. Ida MD, MBA, FACS (is Attending Physician, Division of Pediatric Otolaryngology, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital, and Associate Professor of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine. Please address correspondence to Michael E. Natarus)","doi":"10.1016/j.jcjq.2024.10.006","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jcjq.2024.10.006","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Many hospitals and surgery centers have focused improvement efforts on operating room inefficiencies. A common inefficiency is missing and unusable surgical instrumentation, which can result in case delays and decreased effectiveness. Lean Six Sigma methodology, a set of process improvement tools focused on the reduction of waste and variation, has been used to identify and correct root causes of missing and unusable instrumentation.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>An analysis of current operations was performed within the Sterile Processing Department (SPD). The team assessed physical workflows, including decontamination, assembly, sterilization, and sterile storage, as well as digital processes. The team identified five drivers of defects: (1) staffing and training, (2) inventory management, (3) equipment and SPD physical environment, (4) standard workflows and communication, and (5) governance structure. A root cause was established for each driver, and Lean Six Sigma principles were applied. Two metrics were established to assess accuracy and efficiency in the SPD. First pass yield was defined as the proportion of trays processed that were usable after the first cycle. Tray defect rate was defined as the proportion of requested instruments that were missing or unusable.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>After implementation, the SPD increased first pass yield from 81.0% to 97.4% (<em>p</em> < 0.001) and reduced the defect rate from 2.2% to < 0.10% (<em>p</em> < 0.001) with sustainment for more than a year.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Application of Lean Six Sigma methodology improved tray accuracy in a hospital's SPD. It is feasible and beneficial to apply improvement methodology developed for manufacturing in the hospital setting to reduce missing and unusable instrumentation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14835,"journal":{"name":"Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety","volume":"51 1","pages":"Pages 33-45"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142824212","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2024.10.002
Patricia L. Kavanagh MD (is Associate Professor, Department of Pediatrics, Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston University, and Research Faculty, Center of Excellence in Sickle Cell Disease, Boston Medical Center.), John J Strouse MD, PhD (is Associate Professor, Departments of Medicine and Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, and Hematologist, Duke University Comprehensive Sickle Cell Center.), Judith A. Paice PhD, RN (is Research Professor, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine.), Stephanie O. Ibemere PhD, RN (is Assistant Professor, Duke University School of Nursing.), Paula Tanabe PhD, RN (is Professor, Duke University School of Nursing and Duke University School of Medicine. Please address correspondence to Patricia L. Kavanagh)
Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a life-limiting multisystem disease primarily affecting individuals of African and Latinx descent. Its most common complication is painful vaso-occlusive episodes (VOEs), which is also the most common reason individuals with SCD seek care in the emergency department (ED). National guidelines recommend the use of standardized approaches to pain management in the ED, preferably using pain management plans tailored to each patient. However, no standard approach to developing these plans exists. This article describes the development of an opioid calculator to help SCD clinicians create individualized plans to better manage acute painful VOE in the ED setting.
{"title":"Development of a Calculator to Determine Individualized Opioid Doses for Treatment of Vaso-Occlusive Episodes for Sickle Cell Disease in the Emergency Department","authors":"Patricia L. Kavanagh MD (is Associate Professor, Department of Pediatrics, Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston University, and Research Faculty, Center of Excellence in Sickle Cell Disease, Boston Medical Center.), John J Strouse MD, PhD (is Associate Professor, Departments of Medicine and Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, and Hematologist, Duke University Comprehensive Sickle Cell Center.), Judith A. Paice PhD, RN (is Research Professor, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine.), Stephanie O. Ibemere PhD, RN (is Assistant Professor, Duke University School of Nursing.), Paula Tanabe PhD, RN (is Professor, Duke University School of Nursing and Duke University School of Medicine. Please address correspondence to Patricia L. Kavanagh)","doi":"10.1016/j.jcjq.2024.10.002","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jcjq.2024.10.002","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a life-limiting multisystem disease primarily affecting individuals of African and Latinx descent. Its most common complication is painful vaso-occlusive episodes (VOEs), which is also the most common reason individuals with SCD seek care in the emergency department (ED). National guidelines recommend the use of standardized approaches to pain management in the ED, preferably using pain management plans tailored to each patient. However, no standard approach to developing these plans exists. This article describes the development of an opioid calculator to help SCD clinicians create individualized plans to better manage acute painful VOE in the ED setting.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14835,"journal":{"name":"Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety","volume":"51 1","pages":"Pages 74-79"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142710300","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-30DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2024.12.007
Elizabeth L Ciemins, Cori C Grant, Meghana Tallam, Cori Rattelman, Curt Lindberg, Rae Ann Williams, Paige S Christensen, N Marcus Thygeson
Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE), including deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, are common causes of preventable hospital death. Most VTEs diagnosed in the outpatient setting are directly linked to a recent hospitalization or surgery.
Methods: A type 2 effectiveness-implementation hybrid study was conducted to develop and implement targeted interventions to improve care for patients with VTE in six US health systems. Primary outcomes included (1) 7-day follow-up after VTE diagnosis (phone calls, office visits); (2) VTE-related hospitalizations or emergency department (ED) visits within 45 days of acute VTE diagnosis; and (3) anticoagulant-associated adverse drug events (ADEs). Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) identified interventions associated with improved care for patients with VTE.
Results: Among 1,265 patients, follow-up within 7 days of an index VTE diagnosis improved from 25.2% to 33.6% (p < 0.0001); among 2,002 patients, hospitalizations/ED visits within 45 days of VTE diagnosis decreased across settings from 7.8% to 6.3% (p = 0.033), and the rate of anticoagulant-associated ADEs remained low (3.1% to 3.4%, p = 0.528). Factors characteristic of improving 7-day follow-up included combinations of (1) safer prescribing and management of anticoagulants and standardized protocols with centralized care processes or (2) safer prescribing and management of anticoagulants with improved care team communication and expanded anticoagulation clinic access for patients prescribed direct oral anticoagulants. Factors associated with 45-day hospitalization/ED visits improvement included high baseline rates of 7-day follow-up, high rates of baseline 45-day hospitalization/ED visits (larger opportunity), improved care team communication, and improved standardization and centralization of protocols.
Conclusion: Combinations of interventions, tailored to local context and team dynamics, improved ambulatory follow-up rates and reduced VTE-related utilization. Health systems may benefit from considering novel, implementation science-informed strategies to foster improvement.
{"title":"Using Implementation Science-Informed Strategies to Improve Transitions of Care for Patients with Venous Thromboembolism.","authors":"Elizabeth L Ciemins, Cori C Grant, Meghana Tallam, Cori Rattelman, Curt Lindberg, Rae Ann Williams, Paige S Christensen, N Marcus Thygeson","doi":"10.1016/j.jcjq.2024.12.007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjq.2024.12.007","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Venous thromboembolism (VTE), including deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, are common causes of preventable hospital death. Most VTEs diagnosed in the outpatient setting are directly linked to a recent hospitalization or surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A type 2 effectiveness-implementation hybrid study was conducted to develop and implement targeted interventions to improve care for patients with VTE in six US health systems. Primary outcomes included (1) 7-day follow-up after VTE diagnosis (phone calls, office visits); (2) VTE-related hospitalizations or emergency department (ED) visits within 45 days of acute VTE diagnosis; and (3) anticoagulant-associated adverse drug events (ADEs). Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) identified interventions associated with improved care for patients with VTE.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 1,265 patients, follow-up within 7 days of an index VTE diagnosis improved from 25.2% to 33.6% (p < 0.0001); among 2,002 patients, hospitalizations/ED visits within 45 days of VTE diagnosis decreased across settings from 7.8% to 6.3% (p = 0.033), and the rate of anticoagulant-associated ADEs remained low (3.1% to 3.4%, p = 0.528). Factors characteristic of improving 7-day follow-up included combinations of (1) safer prescribing and management of anticoagulants and standardized protocols with centralized care processes or (2) safer prescribing and management of anticoagulants with improved care team communication and expanded anticoagulation clinic access for patients prescribed direct oral anticoagulants. Factors associated with 45-day hospitalization/ED visits improvement included high baseline rates of 7-day follow-up, high rates of baseline 45-day hospitalization/ED visits (larger opportunity), improved care team communication, and improved standardization and centralization of protocols.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Combinations of interventions, tailored to local context and team dynamics, improved ambulatory follow-up rates and reduced VTE-related utilization. Health systems may benefit from considering novel, implementation science-informed strategies to foster improvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":14835,"journal":{"name":"Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143382403","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-21DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2024.12.008
Erin R. Fox PharmD, MHA, BCPS, FASHP (is Associate Chief Pharmacy Officer, Shared Services, University of Utah Health, and Professor (adjunct), Department of Pharmacotherapy, University of Utah College of Pharmacy, Salt Lake City. Please address correspondence to Erin R. Fox)
{"title":"The Invisible Work to Manage Drug Shortages","authors":"Erin R. Fox PharmD, MHA, BCPS, FASHP (is Associate Chief Pharmacy Officer, Shared Services, University of Utah Health, and Professor (adjunct), Department of Pharmacotherapy, University of Utah College of Pharmacy, Salt Lake City. Please address correspondence to Erin R. Fox)","doi":"10.1016/j.jcjq.2024.12.008","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jcjq.2024.12.008","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14835,"journal":{"name":"Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety","volume":"51 3","pages":"Pages 165-166"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143005628","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-20DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2024.12.004
Lauren O'Callaghan, Shane Ahern, Andrea Doyle
Background: The cardiac operating room is a complex, high-risk, sociotechnical system. Risks in cardiac surgery and anesthesiology have been extensively categorized, but less is known about effective risk reduction strategies. A comprehensive understanding of effective, evidence-based risk reduction strategies is necessary to improve patient safety in cardiac anesthesia.
Methods: An advanced literature search of MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, and Web of Science databases was conducted to identify studies involving the introduction of a tool or intervention to improve patient safety and human factors in cardiac anesthesia. Studies were screened independently by two authors applying prespecified inclusion and exclusion criteria. Risk reduction strategies and safety initiatives identified were classified according to the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety model. Data were extracted using a standardized form and were narratively synthesized.
Results: A total of 18 studies were identified for inclusion using preoperative briefing tools, intraoperative checklists, and postoperative handover tools. Preoperative briefing tools were associated with a significant reduction in patient mortality and length of hospital stay and also led to adaptations to planned operation. Intraoperative checklists demonstrated decreased bleeding, mortality, and blood transfusion requirements. Postoperative handover tools were associated with improved information transfer and teamwork.
Conclusion: This review identified three categories of tools that may be used to improve patient and organizational outcomes. Many of these tools are simple to introduce and sustainable in the long term and can be readily adapted to different centers.
{"title":"Safety Interventions in Cardiac Anesthesia: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Lauren O'Callaghan, Shane Ahern, Andrea Doyle","doi":"10.1016/j.jcjq.2024.12.004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjq.2024.12.004","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The cardiac operating room is a complex, high-risk, sociotechnical system. Risks in cardiac surgery and anesthesiology have been extensively categorized, but less is known about effective risk reduction strategies. A comprehensive understanding of effective, evidence-based risk reduction strategies is necessary to improve patient safety in cardiac anesthesia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An advanced literature search of MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, and Web of Science databases was conducted to identify studies involving the introduction of a tool or intervention to improve patient safety and human factors in cardiac anesthesia. Studies were screened independently by two authors applying prespecified inclusion and exclusion criteria. Risk reduction strategies and safety initiatives identified were classified according to the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety model. Data were extracted using a standardized form and were narratively synthesized.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 18 studies were identified for inclusion using preoperative briefing tools, intraoperative checklists, and postoperative handover tools. Preoperative briefing tools were associated with a significant reduction in patient mortality and length of hospital stay and also led to adaptations to planned operation. Intraoperative checklists demonstrated decreased bleeding, mortality, and blood transfusion requirements. Postoperative handover tools were associated with improved information transfer and teamwork.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This review identified three categories of tools that may be used to improve patient and organizational outcomes. Many of these tools are simple to introduce and sustainable in the long term and can be readily adapted to different centers.</p>","PeriodicalId":14835,"journal":{"name":"Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143059089","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-20DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2024.12.002
Peter D Mills, Anne Tomolo, Edward E Yackel
Background: Telehealth involves providing health care remotely using communication tools such as telephone, video, and remote patient monitoring. Research on telehealth has shown many benefits, including improved access to care and reduced costs, and drawbacks, including delays in care, breakdowns in communication, and missed diagnoses. The use of telehealth nationally, including in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA), expanded dramatically during the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite its increased use, few studies have described adverse events or the role of patient safety in the provision of telehealth.
Methods: The authors looked at all reports of adverse events and close calls in the VHA involving the use of telehealth between October 1, 2022, and February 2, 2023, and coded each case for the location of the event, type of event, and causes.
Results: A total of 145 reports met criteria for review. Most events occurred in primary care, outpatient behavioral health, and radiology, with delays in care, medication errors, and equipment problems being common types. Most reported events did not cause harm; 45 cases were identified as an unsafe condition, 37 as a close call, and 15 as causing some harm to the patient. There were 3,609,105 telehealth episodes of care during this time, resulting in a reporting rate of 4.02 per 100,000 episodes of care and 0.42 reports of harm per 100,000 episodes of care.
Conclusion: The most frequent telehealth-related events were delays in care, medication errors, and equipment issues, and most events were not unique to this modality. Further research is needed to characterize safety events unique to telehealth to better define parameters for patient safety activities. Recommendations to reduce errors include ongoing provider training, human factors analysis of telehealth processes, simplifying processes and procedures for providers and patients to get help for technical or knowledge deficits in real time, and examining the business rules for telehealth care.
{"title":"Adverse Events Involving Telehealth in the Veterans Health Administration.","authors":"Peter D Mills, Anne Tomolo, Edward E Yackel","doi":"10.1016/j.jcjq.2024.12.002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjq.2024.12.002","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Telehealth involves providing health care remotely using communication tools such as telephone, video, and remote patient monitoring. Research on telehealth has shown many benefits, including improved access to care and reduced costs, and drawbacks, including delays in care, breakdowns in communication, and missed diagnoses. The use of telehealth nationally, including in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA), expanded dramatically during the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite its increased use, few studies have described adverse events or the role of patient safety in the provision of telehealth.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors looked at all reports of adverse events and close calls in the VHA involving the use of telehealth between October 1, 2022, and February 2, 2023, and coded each case for the location of the event, type of event, and causes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 145 reports met criteria for review. Most events occurred in primary care, outpatient behavioral health, and radiology, with delays in care, medication errors, and equipment problems being common types. Most reported events did not cause harm; 45 cases were identified as an unsafe condition, 37 as a close call, and 15 as causing some harm to the patient. There were 3,609,105 telehealth episodes of care during this time, resulting in a reporting rate of 4.02 per 100,000 episodes of care and 0.42 reports of harm per 100,000 episodes of care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The most frequent telehealth-related events were delays in care, medication errors, and equipment issues, and most events were not unique to this modality. Further research is needed to characterize safety events unique to telehealth to better define parameters for patient safety activities. Recommendations to reduce errors include ongoing provider training, human factors analysis of telehealth processes, simplifying processes and procedures for providers and patients to get help for technical or knowledge deficits in real time, and examining the business rules for telehealth care.</p>","PeriodicalId":14835,"journal":{"name":"Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143023579","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-19DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2024.12.003
Ashley B Tartarilla, Leah Porter, James J Horgan, Phillip D Hahn, Grace Drost, Dionne A Graham, Michele M Garvin, Valerie L Ward
Background: Medical-legal partnerships (MLPs) are a hospital-based resource for patients and families to address health-related legal needs, which often align closely with health-related social needs (HRSNs). For instance, patients and their families with housing insecurity or education, immigration, family law, or other legal needs, or who are having trouble accessing government benefits programs are referred by their health care provider to the MLP. Next, an intake process determines eligibility for MLP services that will result in connecting the patients and their families with resources or legal assistance to address the HRSNs. The Joint Commission's health equity requirements were established as a quality and safety imperative and focus on obtaining patient-specific data for HRSNs in the populations a hospital serves to address the root causes of disparities in patients' health outcomes. The authors examined data for pediatric patients referred to the hospital's MLP as an example of using legal referral data to obtain HRSNs data to comply with these requirements.
Methods: The researchers collected and analyzed data on sociodemographic factors, clinical characteristics, and reason for referral of pediatric patients to a hospital-based MLP. Data were collected from January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2021, spanning the duration of the COVID-19 pandemic. The legal matters from January 1, 2019, to March 9, 2020, were classified as pre-COVID-19 pandemic legal matters, and the legal matters from March 10, 2020, to December 31, 2021, were classified as having occurred during the COVID-19 pandemic. These two time periods were analyzed to account for any pandemic-related effects.
Results: A total of 628 patients (median age 9.0 years; male 48.2%) were referred for 611 legal matters (referrals including more than 1 patient from a single household were counted once). Patients were more likely to be Hispanic/Latino, Black/African American, English-speaking, and publicly insured. Many had at least one complex chronic condition (44.4%). More than half of referrals were for housing insecurity (52.1%). This was consistent in the pre-COVID-19 pandemic period and during the COVID-19 period (52.0% vs. 52.2%, p = 0.95).
Conclusion: Most MLP referrals were for housing insecurity in children from medically underserved or marginalized populations. Aligning The Joint Commission's health equity requirements with legal referral data is a generalizable approach to improve the collection of HRSNs data for addressing disparities in health outcomes in the populations the hospital serves.
{"title":"Complying with Joint Commission Health Equity Requirements: Medical-Legal Partnership Data and Health-Related Social Needs.","authors":"Ashley B Tartarilla, Leah Porter, James J Horgan, Phillip D Hahn, Grace Drost, Dionne A Graham, Michele M Garvin, Valerie L Ward","doi":"10.1016/j.jcjq.2024.12.003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjq.2024.12.003","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Medical-legal partnerships (MLPs) are a hospital-based resource for patients and families to address health-related legal needs, which often align closely with health-related social needs (HRSNs). For instance, patients and their families with housing insecurity or education, immigration, family law, or other legal needs, or who are having trouble accessing government benefits programs are referred by their health care provider to the MLP. Next, an intake process determines eligibility for MLP services that will result in connecting the patients and their families with resources or legal assistance to address the HRSNs. The Joint Commission's health equity requirements were established as a quality and safety imperative and focus on obtaining patient-specific data for HRSNs in the populations a hospital serves to address the root causes of disparities in patients' health outcomes. The authors examined data for pediatric patients referred to the hospital's MLP as an example of using legal referral data to obtain HRSNs data to comply with these requirements.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The researchers collected and analyzed data on sociodemographic factors, clinical characteristics, and reason for referral of pediatric patients to a hospital-based MLP. Data were collected from January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2021, spanning the duration of the COVID-19 pandemic. The legal matters from January 1, 2019, to March 9, 2020, were classified as pre-COVID-19 pandemic legal matters, and the legal matters from March 10, 2020, to December 31, 2021, were classified as having occurred during the COVID-19 pandemic. These two time periods were analyzed to account for any pandemic-related effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 628 patients (median age 9.0 years; male 48.2%) were referred for 611 legal matters (referrals including more than 1 patient from a single household were counted once). Patients were more likely to be Hispanic/Latino, Black/African American, English-speaking, and publicly insured. Many had at least one complex chronic condition (44.4%). More than half of referrals were for housing insecurity (52.1%). This was consistent in the pre-COVID-19 pandemic period and during the COVID-19 period (52.0% vs. 52.2%, p = 0.95).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most MLP referrals were for housing insecurity in children from medically underserved or marginalized populations. Aligning The Joint Commission's health equity requirements with legal referral data is a generalizable approach to improve the collection of HRSNs data for addressing disparities in health outcomes in the populations the hospital serves.</p>","PeriodicalId":14835,"journal":{"name":"Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143425243","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-19DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2024.12.005
Daniel E. Hall MD, MDiv, MHSc, FACS (is Professor of Surgery and Anesthesiology & Perioperative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, and Core Investigator, Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Pittsburgh Healthcare System.), Carly A. Jacobs MPH (is Health Science Specialist, Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System.), Katherine M. Reitz MD, MSc (is Assistant Professor of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, and Vascular Surgeon, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center.), Shipra Arya MD, SM, FACS (is Professor, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, and Section Chief, Vascular Surgery, VA Palo Alto Healthcare System, Palo Alto, California.), Michael A. Jacobs MS (is Research Health Science Specialist, Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System.), John Cashy PhD (is Core Investigator, Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System.), Jason M. Johanning MD, MS, FACS (is Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center, and Chief Surgical Consultant, Nebraska-Western Iowa VA Medical Center. Please address correspondence to Daniel E. Hall.)
The Risk Analysis Index (RAI) has emerged as the most thoroughly validated and flexible assessment of surgical frailty, proven feasible for at-scale bedside screening and available in a suite of tools, that effectively risk stratifies patients across a wide variety of clinical contexts and data sources. This user guide provides a definitive summary of the RAI's theoretical model, historical development, validation, statistical performance, and clinical interpretation, placing the RAI in context with other frailty assessments and emphasizing some of its advantages. Detailed instructions are provided for each RAI variant, along with a systematic review of existing RAI–related literature.
{"title":"Frailty Screening Using the Risk Analysis Index: A User Guide","authors":"Daniel E. Hall MD, MDiv, MHSc, FACS (is Professor of Surgery and Anesthesiology & Perioperative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, and Core Investigator, Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Pittsburgh Healthcare System.), Carly A. Jacobs MPH (is Health Science Specialist, Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System.), Katherine M. Reitz MD, MSc (is Assistant Professor of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, and Vascular Surgeon, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center.), Shipra Arya MD, SM, FACS (is Professor, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, and Section Chief, Vascular Surgery, VA Palo Alto Healthcare System, Palo Alto, California.), Michael A. Jacobs MS (is Research Health Science Specialist, Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System.), John Cashy PhD (is Core Investigator, Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System.), Jason M. Johanning MD, MS, FACS (is Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center, and Chief Surgical Consultant, Nebraska-Western Iowa VA Medical Center. Please address correspondence to Daniel E. Hall.)","doi":"10.1016/j.jcjq.2024.12.005","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jcjq.2024.12.005","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Risk Analysis Index (RAI) has emerged as the most thoroughly validated and flexible assessment of surgical frailty, proven feasible for at-scale bedside screening and available in a suite of tools, that effectively risk stratifies patients across a wide variety of clinical contexts and data sources. This user guide provides a definitive summary of the RAI's theoretical model, historical development, validation, statistical performance, and clinical interpretation, placing the RAI in context with other frailty assessments and emphasizing some of its advantages. Detailed instructions are provided for each RAI variant, along with a systematic review of existing RAI–related literature.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14835,"journal":{"name":"Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety","volume":"51 3","pages":"Pages 178-191"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143038980","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}