Zi Yang, Xiaojuan Wang, Jianlin Wang, Qi Guang, Xueqian Ding, Hao Liu, Yunpeng Xu, Jing Zhao, Ming Bai
Background: Cardiovascular diseases remain the leading global cause of mortality, yet traditional electrocardiogram (ECG) interpretation shows subjective variability and limited sensitivity to complex pathologies.
Objective: This study aims to address these challenges by proposing the Cardiovascular Multimodal Prediction Network (CaMPNet), a transformer-based multimodal architecture that integrates raw 12-lead ECG waveforms, 9-structured machine-measured ECG features, and demographic data (age and sex) through cross-attention fusion.
Methods: The model was trained on 384,877 records from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV - Electrocardiogram Matched Subset database and evaluated across 12 cardiovascular disease labels. To further assess temporal robustness, a temporal external validation was performed using the most recent 10% of the data, withheld chronologically from model development.
Results: On the internal test set, the model achieved a mean area under the curve (AUC) of 0.845 (SD 0.04) and area under the precision-recall curve of 0.489, outperforming the residual networks-ECG baseline (AUC=0.848 but F1-score=0.152) and all single-modality variants. Subgroup analyses demonstrated consistent performance across demographics (male AUC= 0.846 vs female=0.843; youngest quartile 0.884 vs oldest 0.811). CaMPNet retained moderate discriminative ability in temporal external validation with a mean AUC of 0.715 (SD 0.03) and area under the precision-recall curve of 0.298, although performance declined due to temporal distribution shifts. Despite this, major disease categories, such as atrial fibrillation, heart failure, and normal rhythm, maintained high AUCs (>0.84). Attention-based visualization revealed clinically interpretable patterns (eg, ST-segment elevations in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction), and ablation experiments verified the model's tolerance to missing structured inputs.
Conclusions: CaMPNet demonstrates robust and interpretable multimodal ECG-based diagnosis, offering a scalable framework for comorbidity screening and continual learning under real-world temporal dynamics.
{"title":"Multimodal Transformer-Based Electrocardiogram Analysis for Cardiovascular Comorbidity Detection: Model Development and Validation Study.","authors":"Zi Yang, Xiaojuan Wang, Jianlin Wang, Qi Guang, Xueqian Ding, Hao Liu, Yunpeng Xu, Jing Zhao, Ming Bai","doi":"10.2196/80815","DOIUrl":"10.2196/80815","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cardiovascular diseases remain the leading global cause of mortality, yet traditional electrocardiogram (ECG) interpretation shows subjective variability and limited sensitivity to complex pathologies.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to address these challenges by proposing the Cardiovascular Multimodal Prediction Network (CaMPNet), a transformer-based multimodal architecture that integrates raw 12-lead ECG waveforms, 9-structured machine-measured ECG features, and demographic data (age and sex) through cross-attention fusion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The model was trained on 384,877 records from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV - Electrocardiogram Matched Subset database and evaluated across 12 cardiovascular disease labels. To further assess temporal robustness, a temporal external validation was performed using the most recent 10% of the data, withheld chronologically from model development.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On the internal test set, the model achieved a mean area under the curve (AUC) of 0.845 (SD 0.04) and area under the precision-recall curve of 0.489, outperforming the residual networks-ECG baseline (AUC=0.848 but F1-score=0.152) and all single-modality variants. Subgroup analyses demonstrated consistent performance across demographics (male AUC= 0.846 vs female=0.843; youngest quartile 0.884 vs oldest 0.811). CaMPNet retained moderate discriminative ability in temporal external validation with a mean AUC of 0.715 (SD 0.03) and area under the precision-recall curve of 0.298, although performance declined due to temporal distribution shifts. Despite this, major disease categories, such as atrial fibrillation, heart failure, and normal rhythm, maintained high AUCs (>0.84). Attention-based visualization revealed clinically interpretable patterns (eg, ST-segment elevations in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction), and ablation experiments verified the model's tolerance to missing structured inputs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CaMPNet demonstrates robust and interpretable multimodal ECG-based diagnosis, offering a scalable framework for comorbidity screening and continual learning under real-world temporal dynamics.</p>","PeriodicalId":14841,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Formative Research","volume":"10 ","pages":"e80815"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12758841/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145892376","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Tianmai M Zhang, Sydney P Sharp, John D Scott, Douglas Taren, Jane C Samaniego, Elizabeth R Unger, Jeanne Bertolli, Jin-Mann S Lin, Christian B Ramers, Job G Godino
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Long COVID encompasses a range of health problems that can be highly debilitating. While some research has relied on self-reported measures of symptoms and functioning, few studies have characterized symptoms in relation to behaviors and physiology measured objectively through wearable devices.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The primary aim of this study was to identify longitudinal patterns in physical activity, physiology, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) among patients with long COVID at a Federally Qualified Health Center in the United States. The secondary aim was to identify meaningful subgroups or phenotypes within this cohort and examine how PROs and symptoms overlay with physical activity characteristics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective, observational, longitudinal cohort study recruiting a subset of low-income patients enrolled in the Long COVID and Fatiguing Illness Recovery Program. From March 2022 to May 2023, a total of 172 patients with long COVID or myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome were given Fitbit Charge 5 (Fitbit Inc) devices and instructed to wear them continuously for up to a year. Patients completed PRO questionnaires (PROMIS-29 [Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-29] and symptom questionnaires, etc) at baseline, 3, and 6 months. Inclusion in longitudinal analysis required at least 20 hours of valid wear data per day for a minimum of 7 days. The World Health Organization guideline on moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) was used to differentiate MPVA-active and MVPA-inactive patients. Linear mixed effects regression was performed to assess longitudinal associations between physical activity levels and PROs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 172 patients, 80.2% (n=138) were female, 75.6% (n=130) were White, 45.3% (n=78) were unemployed, and 94.8% (n=163) had estimated annual income below US $50,000. Of these patients, 82 (47.7%) met valid wear criteria, providing 50.5 days of Fitbit data on average. At baseline, MVPA-inactive patients (n=41) reported statistically more severe problems regarding physical function, fatigue, and dyspnea than MVPA-active patients (n=41) on both continuous and categorical scales, with P<.05 from both Student t tests (2-tailed) and chi-squared tests. Longitudinal analysis found that MVPA-inactive patients showed a decreased ability to participate in social roles (estimated group difference=-4.21 T-score points over 3 months, 95% CI -6.64 to -1.78, P<.001) and a higher intensity of sleep symptoms (estimated group difference=2.06 severity score points over 3 months, 95% CI 0.40 to 3.71, P=.02) over time.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study showed that patients with long COVID could remain MVPA-active despite experiencing symptoms. These findings provide insights into the relationship between PROs, physical activity, and long COVID, which suggests the importance of considering
{"title":"Characterization of Post-Viral Infection Behaviors Among Patients With Long COVID: Prospective, Observational, Longitudinal Cohort Analyses of Fitbit Data and Patient-Reported Outcomes.","authors":"Tianmai M Zhang, Sydney P Sharp, John D Scott, Douglas Taren, Jane C Samaniego, Elizabeth R Unger, Jeanne Bertolli, Jin-Mann S Lin, Christian B Ramers, Job G Godino","doi":"10.2196/77644","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2196/77644","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Long COVID encompasses a range of health problems that can be highly debilitating. While some research has relied on self-reported measures of symptoms and functioning, few studies have characterized symptoms in relation to behaviors and physiology measured objectively through wearable devices.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The primary aim of this study was to identify longitudinal patterns in physical activity, physiology, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) among patients with long COVID at a Federally Qualified Health Center in the United States. The secondary aim was to identify meaningful subgroups or phenotypes within this cohort and examine how PROs and symptoms overlay with physical activity characteristics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective, observational, longitudinal cohort study recruiting a subset of low-income patients enrolled in the Long COVID and Fatiguing Illness Recovery Program. From March 2022 to May 2023, a total of 172 patients with long COVID or myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome were given Fitbit Charge 5 (Fitbit Inc) devices and instructed to wear them continuously for up to a year. Patients completed PRO questionnaires (PROMIS-29 [Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-29] and symptom questionnaires, etc) at baseline, 3, and 6 months. Inclusion in longitudinal analysis required at least 20 hours of valid wear data per day for a minimum of 7 days. The World Health Organization guideline on moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) was used to differentiate MPVA-active and MVPA-inactive patients. Linear mixed effects regression was performed to assess longitudinal associations between physical activity levels and PROs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 172 patients, 80.2% (n=138) were female, 75.6% (n=130) were White, 45.3% (n=78) were unemployed, and 94.8% (n=163) had estimated annual income below US $50,000. Of these patients, 82 (47.7%) met valid wear criteria, providing 50.5 days of Fitbit data on average. At baseline, MVPA-inactive patients (n=41) reported statistically more severe problems regarding physical function, fatigue, and dyspnea than MVPA-active patients (n=41) on both continuous and categorical scales, with P<.05 from both Student t tests (2-tailed) and chi-squared tests. Longitudinal analysis found that MVPA-inactive patients showed a decreased ability to participate in social roles (estimated group difference=-4.21 T-score points over 3 months, 95% CI -6.64 to -1.78, P<.001) and a higher intensity of sleep symptoms (estimated group difference=2.06 severity score points over 3 months, 95% CI 0.40 to 3.71, P=.02) over time.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study showed that patients with long COVID could remain MVPA-active despite experiencing symptoms. These findings provide insights into the relationship between PROs, physical activity, and long COVID, which suggests the importance of considering ","PeriodicalId":14841,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Formative Research","volume":"9 ","pages":"e77644"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145878409","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Alexander Shayesteh, Maja Af Klinteberg, Sophie Vrang, Gunnthorunn Sigurdardottir, MariHelen Sandström Falk, Mikael Alsterholm
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Topical steroid withdrawal (TSW) is a controversial skin condition among health care providers due to a lack of evidence, but it has an impactful and growing presence on social media. There are few previous reports of health care utilization for symptoms attributed to TSW.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to investigate health care utilization and requests as well as information sources for TSW among patients with atopic dermatitis (AD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This observational cross-sectional study used a questionnaire aimed at adults with AD, experiencing symptoms they attribute to TSW. The questionnaire was posted as a link, free to share with others, in a Swedish TSW-themed Facebook group and remained accessible for 4 weeks. Descriptive statistics and topical text analysis on open-ended items were used to present and interpret the results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The participants (n=82) reported dermatologists (n=41, 50%), general practitioners (n=40, 49%), and practitioners of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM; n=32, 39%) as the most frequent health care contacts for TSW. However, among participants with ongoing symptoms attributed to TSW (n=68), ongoing health care contacts with general practitioners, dermatologists, and practitioners of CAM were reported by only 10% (n=7), 22% (n=15), and 13% (n=11), respectively. For symptoms attributed to AD, the frequencies of health care provider contacts were higher. Almost all participants had sought help from a general practitioner (n=81, 99%) or a dermatologist (n=76, 93%) at some point, and many had also consulted a practitioner of CAM (n=59, 72%). Among those with ongoing symptoms attributed to AD, 43% (n=26) had an ongoing contact with a dermatologist. Participant-requested help and support from health care providers included understanding and confirmation of TSW impairments (n=45, 56%), treatment of symptoms (n=26, 32%), and increased awareness and information about TSW from health care providers (n=21, 26%). The most common TSW information sources were Facebook (n=78, 96%), websites (n=75, 93%), and Instagram (n=45, 56%), but YouTube (n=11, 14%), podcasts (n=7, 10%), and TikTok (n=5, 6%) were also reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study investigates health care utilization patterns related to TSW. The results indicate that the participants received insufficient support from health care providers for symptoms they attributed to TSW. The participants initiated and maintained health care provider contacts for symptoms attributed to AD to a greater extent than for TSW and sought information and support for TSW elsewhere. Targeted interventions to overcome this could be educational efforts for general practitioners and dermatologists about the current scientific knowledge of TSW as well as the TSW discourse on social media. In addition, health care providers need to engage and contribute to evidence-based
{"title":"Health Care Utilization in Patients With Atopic Dermatitis Experiencing Topical Steroid Withdrawal: Observational Cross-Sectional Social Media Questionnaire Study.","authors":"Alexander Shayesteh, Maja Af Klinteberg, Sophie Vrang, Gunnthorunn Sigurdardottir, MariHelen Sandström Falk, Mikael Alsterholm","doi":"10.2196/85183","DOIUrl":"10.2196/85183","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Topical steroid withdrawal (TSW) is a controversial skin condition among health care providers due to a lack of evidence, but it has an impactful and growing presence on social media. There are few previous reports of health care utilization for symptoms attributed to TSW.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to investigate health care utilization and requests as well as information sources for TSW among patients with atopic dermatitis (AD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This observational cross-sectional study used a questionnaire aimed at adults with AD, experiencing symptoms they attribute to TSW. The questionnaire was posted as a link, free to share with others, in a Swedish TSW-themed Facebook group and remained accessible for 4 weeks. Descriptive statistics and topical text analysis on open-ended items were used to present and interpret the results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The participants (n=82) reported dermatologists (n=41, 50%), general practitioners (n=40, 49%), and practitioners of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM; n=32, 39%) as the most frequent health care contacts for TSW. However, among participants with ongoing symptoms attributed to TSW (n=68), ongoing health care contacts with general practitioners, dermatologists, and practitioners of CAM were reported by only 10% (n=7), 22% (n=15), and 13% (n=11), respectively. For symptoms attributed to AD, the frequencies of health care provider contacts were higher. Almost all participants had sought help from a general practitioner (n=81, 99%) or a dermatologist (n=76, 93%) at some point, and many had also consulted a practitioner of CAM (n=59, 72%). Among those with ongoing symptoms attributed to AD, 43% (n=26) had an ongoing contact with a dermatologist. Participant-requested help and support from health care providers included understanding and confirmation of TSW impairments (n=45, 56%), treatment of symptoms (n=26, 32%), and increased awareness and information about TSW from health care providers (n=21, 26%). The most common TSW information sources were Facebook (n=78, 96%), websites (n=75, 93%), and Instagram (n=45, 56%), but YouTube (n=11, 14%), podcasts (n=7, 10%), and TikTok (n=5, 6%) were also reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study investigates health care utilization patterns related to TSW. The results indicate that the participants received insufficient support from health care providers for symptoms they attributed to TSW. The participants initiated and maintained health care provider contacts for symptoms attributed to AD to a greater extent than for TSW and sought information and support for TSW elsewhere. Targeted interventions to overcome this could be educational efforts for general practitioners and dermatologists about the current scientific knowledge of TSW as well as the TSW discourse on social media. In addition, health care providers need to engage and contribute to evidence-based ","PeriodicalId":14841,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Formative Research","volume":"9 ","pages":"e85183"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12755344/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145878339","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Fereshteh Baygi, Theis Bitz Trabjerg, Lars Henrik Jensen, Maria Munch Storsveen, Sonja Wehberg, Jens Søndergaard, Dorte Gilså Hansen
Background: Enhancing care coordination and sharing information in cancer care improves patient experiences by promoting clarity and satisfaction.
Objective: This study aims to assess the impact of cross-sectoral video consultation on patient perceptions of care coordination and satisfaction with received information compared to usual care.
Methods: This study presents secondary outcomes on patient perceptions of care coordination and satisfaction with received information from a 7-month follow-up of the Partnership Project. In this randomized controlled trial, patients with cancer were allocated to either an intervention group receiving cross-sectoral video consultation (oncologist, general practitioner, and patient) or a control group receiving usual care. Patients' perceptions of care coordination and information quality were assessed using the Australian Cancer Care Coordination Questionnaire (CCCQ) and the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Information Questionnaire 25 at baseline and 7 months. Changes over time between groups were analyzed using generalized estimating equations.
Results: Of the 278 participants randomized (1:1), only 80 (28.8%) patients received the intervention due to technical and administrative issues. A total of 210 (75.5%) patients completed the baseline questionnaire, while 118 (42.4%) responded at 7 months. No significant differences were observed in the changes over time between the intervention and control groups in any outcome. The estimated differences in the change in score from baseline to 7 months were as follows: for the total CCCQ score, 1.11 (95% CI -2.32 to 4.53; P=.53); for the overall European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Information Questionnaire 25 score, 1.49 (95% CI -2.98 to 5.96; P=.51); for the CCCQ communication subscale, -1.49 (95% CI -1.33 to 4.31; P=.30); and for the navigation subscale, -0.03 (95% CI -1.52 to 1.46; P=.97).
Conclusions: Our findings indicate no statistically significant improvement in patients' reported care coordination or satisfaction with received information over 7 months. Technical issues with the video setup reduced fidelity rates and follow-up participation. Further research is needed to optimize the structure and content of cross-sectoral video consultations to better support patients' perceived outcomes.
{"title":"Impact of Cross-Sectoral Video Consultation on Perceived Care Coordination and Information Satisfaction in Cancer Care: Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Fereshteh Baygi, Theis Bitz Trabjerg, Lars Henrik Jensen, Maria Munch Storsveen, Sonja Wehberg, Jens Søndergaard, Dorte Gilså Hansen","doi":"10.2196/76910","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2196/76910","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Enhancing care coordination and sharing information in cancer care improves patient experiences by promoting clarity and satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to assess the impact of cross-sectoral video consultation on patient perceptions of care coordination and satisfaction with received information compared to usual care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study presents secondary outcomes on patient perceptions of care coordination and satisfaction with received information from a 7-month follow-up of the Partnership Project. In this randomized controlled trial, patients with cancer were allocated to either an intervention group receiving cross-sectoral video consultation (oncologist, general practitioner, and patient) or a control group receiving usual care. Patients' perceptions of care coordination and information quality were assessed using the Australian Cancer Care Coordination Questionnaire (CCCQ) and the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Information Questionnaire 25 at baseline and 7 months. Changes over time between groups were analyzed using generalized estimating equations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 278 participants randomized (1:1), only 80 (28.8%) patients received the intervention due to technical and administrative issues. A total of 210 (75.5%) patients completed the baseline questionnaire, while 118 (42.4%) responded at 7 months. No significant differences were observed in the changes over time between the intervention and control groups in any outcome. The estimated differences in the change in score from baseline to 7 months were as follows: for the total CCCQ score, 1.11 (95% CI -2.32 to 4.53; P=.53); for the overall European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Information Questionnaire 25 score, 1.49 (95% CI -2.98 to 5.96; P=.51); for the CCCQ communication subscale, -1.49 (95% CI -1.33 to 4.31; P=.30); and for the navigation subscale, -0.03 (95% CI -1.52 to 1.46; P=.97).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings indicate no statistically significant improvement in patients' reported care coordination or satisfaction with received information over 7 months. Technical issues with the video setup reduced fidelity rates and follow-up participation. Further research is needed to optimize the structure and content of cross-sectoral video consultations to better support patients' perceived outcomes.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02716168; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02716168.</p>","PeriodicalId":14841,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Formative Research","volume":"9 ","pages":"e76910"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145878327","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Alfred Doku, Lawrence Sena Tuglo, Chiedozie Osuoji, Juliette Edzeame, Marisa Broni, David Danso Mainoo, Alberta Ewuziwaa Acquah, Kwatetso Honny, Ron J G Peters, Charles Agyemang
Background: Health care professionals must stay updated with the latest guidelines for basic life support (BLS) and advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) to effectively assist patients during cardiac emergencies. Since its launch in 2018, the Ghana Heart Initiative has significantly enhanced the skills and knowledge of health care professionals in managing cardiovascular diseases, including cardiac emergencies.
Objective: This study aims to assess the knowledge and skills of BLS and ACLS among health care professionals immediately after training in Ghana.
Methods: This cross-sectional, training-based study involved 541 and 302 health care professionals trained in BLS and ACLS, respectively. Among them, 229 BLS and 124 ACLS-trained participants completed the questionnaires immediately after the training, and their data were included in the final analysis. Knowledge was assessed using a standardized questionnaire and an instructor-led skills evaluation based on the updated 2018 and 2020 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care.
Results: This study shows that 74.6% (171/229) of the health care professionals had adequate knowledge and skills in BLS. Those working in tertiary health care facilities were 80% less likely (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 0.20, 95% CI 0.07-0.59; P=.003) to have adequate BLS knowledge and skills than those in primary health care facilities. Health care professionals from regions such as Volta and Oti were 4.94 times more likely to have adequate BLS knowledge and skills compared to those from Bono East (AOR 4.94, 95% CI 1.17-20.80; P=.03). Over 73.3% (91/124) of health care professionals had adequate knowledge and skills in ACLS. Males were 7.05 times more likely (AOR 7.05, 95% CI 2.69-18.46; P<.001) than females to possess adequate ACLS knowledge and skills.
Conclusions: Given an opportunity to learn and practice, health care professionals in Ghana attain adequate knowledge and skills in BLS and ACLS.
背景:医疗保健专业人员必须及时更新基本生命支持(BLS)和高级心脏生命支持(ACLS)的最新指南,以有效地帮助心脏紧急情况下的患者。自2018年启动以来,加纳心脏倡议大大提高了卫生保健专业人员在管理心血管疾病(包括心脏紧急情况)方面的技能和知识。目的:本研究旨在评估加纳卫生保健专业人员在培训后立即使用BLS和ACLS的知识和技能。方法:这项以培训为基础的横断面研究分别涉及541名和302名接受过BLS和ACLS培训的卫生保健专业人员。其中,经BLS培训的229名和经acls培训的124名参与者在培训结束后立即完成了问卷调查,其数据纳入最终分析。根据更新的2018年和2020年美国心脏协会心肺复苏和紧急心血管护理指南,使用标准化问卷和讲师指导的技能评估来评估知识。结果:74.6%(171/229)的卫生保健专业人员具备足够的BLS知识和技能。在三级卫生保健机构工作的人员比在初级卫生保健机构工作的人员掌握足够的劳工统计局知识和技能的可能性低80%(调整后的优势比[AOR] 0.20, 95% CI 0.07-0.59; P= 0.003)。来自Volta和Oti等地区的卫生保健专业人员拥有足够的BLS知识和技能的可能性是Bono East地区的4.94倍(AOR 4.94, 95% CI 1.17-20.80; P= 0.03)。超过73.3%(91/124)的医护人员具备足够的ACLS知识和技能。男性的可能性是7.05倍(AOR 7.05, 95% CI 2.69-18.46);结论:如果有机会学习和实践,加纳的卫生保健专业人员在BLS和ACLS方面获得了足够的知识和技能。
{"title":"Ghana Heart Initiative Training for Cardiac Arrest Management Among Health Care Professionals: Outcomes Evaluation Study (2019-2024).","authors":"Alfred Doku, Lawrence Sena Tuglo, Chiedozie Osuoji, Juliette Edzeame, Marisa Broni, David Danso Mainoo, Alberta Ewuziwaa Acquah, Kwatetso Honny, Ron J G Peters, Charles Agyemang","doi":"10.2196/75536","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2196/75536","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Health care professionals must stay updated with the latest guidelines for basic life support (BLS) and advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) to effectively assist patients during cardiac emergencies. Since its launch in 2018, the Ghana Heart Initiative has significantly enhanced the skills and knowledge of health care professionals in managing cardiovascular diseases, including cardiac emergencies.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to assess the knowledge and skills of BLS and ACLS among health care professionals immediately after training in Ghana.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional, training-based study involved 541 and 302 health care professionals trained in BLS and ACLS, respectively. Among them, 229 BLS and 124 ACLS-trained participants completed the questionnaires immediately after the training, and their data were included in the final analysis. Knowledge was assessed using a standardized questionnaire and an instructor-led skills evaluation based on the updated 2018 and 2020 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study shows that 74.6% (171/229) of the health care professionals had adequate knowledge and skills in BLS. Those working in tertiary health care facilities were 80% less likely (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 0.20, 95% CI 0.07-0.59; P=.003) to have adequate BLS knowledge and skills than those in primary health care facilities. Health care professionals from regions such as Volta and Oti were 4.94 times more likely to have adequate BLS knowledge and skills compared to those from Bono East (AOR 4.94, 95% CI 1.17-20.80; P=.03). Over 73.3% (91/124) of health care professionals had adequate knowledge and skills in ACLS. Males were 7.05 times more likely (AOR 7.05, 95% CI 2.69-18.46; P<.001) than females to possess adequate ACLS knowledge and skills.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Given an opportunity to learn and practice, health care professionals in Ghana attain adequate knowledge and skills in BLS and ACLS.</p>","PeriodicalId":14841,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Formative Research","volume":"9 ","pages":"e75536"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145878390","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Marvyn R Arévalo Avalos, Julio Fu, Adrian Aguilera, Luis Suarez
Background: There is a gap in mental health care among Latino/x and Spanish-speaking communities, and the care that is available is often difficult to access, lacks cultural nuance, and results in low engagement and satisfaction.
Objective: The study aimed to evaluate the reach, adoption, and acceptability of digital Spanish-language psychosocial and emotional wellness services among Latino/x adults offered by the digital health company Sanarai.
Methods: Data included in this study were collected between August 2020 and September 2024 by Sanarai as part of its ongoing services. Quantitative data sources included individual customers' appointment data, individual session payment data, and customer satisfaction data. Qualitative data were obtained from transcribed notes of telephone or video-based user interviews conducted by Sanarai staff between August 2020 and May 2024.
Results: Between August 2020 and September 2024, Sanarai served 6163 users (n=3662, 59.42% women participants) across all 50 US states, with the highest concentration of participants in Texas and California. Results showed 94% (n=5793) of users scheduled a first appointment within 1 week, with 43% (n=2650) doing so within 1 day. Over 62.60% (n=3858) of participants engaged in two or more sessions, attending an average of 8.94 (SD 13) sessions over 110 days (SD 169). The platform delivered a total of 36,858 appointments, including individual and couples sessions. Only 22.47% (n=1385) of users responded to a customer satisfaction survey for a total of 2287 distinct responses; among this subgroup, session satisfaction was high with an average satisfaction rating of 4.88 out of 5.0 (SD 0.49) and a Net Promoter Score of +85. Nearly all responses (n=2174, 95.06%) expressed intent to schedule another session, but these results should be interpreted with caution, given the low response rate. Qualitative interviews with 30 users (n=21, 70% women) revealed a diverse user base. Many users reported prior mental health service experiences, while one-third were new to care. Participants cited cost, cultural fit, language access, and convenience as key reasons for choosing Sanarai over local services. Users highlighted the platform's affordability, scheduling flexibility, and provider professionalism as central to their positive experiences.
Conclusions: These findings underscore the value of culturally responsive, accessible online mental health care for Spanish-speaking communities.
{"title":"Reach, Engagement, and Acceptability of a Subclinical Telehealth Service for Spanish-Speaking Adults: Retrospective Mixed Methods Pilot Study.","authors":"Marvyn R Arévalo Avalos, Julio Fu, Adrian Aguilera, Luis Suarez","doi":"10.2196/80026","DOIUrl":"10.2196/80026","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is a gap in mental health care among Latino/x and Spanish-speaking communities, and the care that is available is often difficult to access, lacks cultural nuance, and results in low engagement and satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The study aimed to evaluate the reach, adoption, and acceptability of digital Spanish-language psychosocial and emotional wellness services among Latino/x adults offered by the digital health company Sanarai.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data included in this study were collected between August 2020 and September 2024 by Sanarai as part of its ongoing services. Quantitative data sources included individual customers' appointment data, individual session payment data, and customer satisfaction data. Qualitative data were obtained from transcribed notes of telephone or video-based user interviews conducted by Sanarai staff between August 2020 and May 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between August 2020 and September 2024, Sanarai served 6163 users (n=3662, 59.42% women participants) across all 50 US states, with the highest concentration of participants in Texas and California. Results showed 94% (n=5793) of users scheduled a first appointment within 1 week, with 43% (n=2650) doing so within 1 day. Over 62.60% (n=3858) of participants engaged in two or more sessions, attending an average of 8.94 (SD 13) sessions over 110 days (SD 169). The platform delivered a total of 36,858 appointments, including individual and couples sessions. Only 22.47% (n=1385) of users responded to a customer satisfaction survey for a total of 2287 distinct responses; among this subgroup, session satisfaction was high with an average satisfaction rating of 4.88 out of 5.0 (SD 0.49) and a Net Promoter Score of +85. Nearly all responses (n=2174, 95.06%) expressed intent to schedule another session, but these results should be interpreted with caution, given the low response rate. Qualitative interviews with 30 users (n=21, 70% women) revealed a diverse user base. Many users reported prior mental health service experiences, while one-third were new to care. Participants cited cost, cultural fit, language access, and convenience as key reasons for choosing Sanarai over local services. Users highlighted the platform's affordability, scheduling flexibility, and provider professionalism as central to their positive experiences.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings underscore the value of culturally responsive, accessible online mental health care for Spanish-speaking communities.</p>","PeriodicalId":14841,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Formative Research","volume":"9 ","pages":"e80026"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12755293/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145878404","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
<p><strong>Background: </strong>In 2020, the global prevalence of overweight and obesity was approximately 42%. One of the most common associated conditions is type 2 diabetes mellitus, which had a global prevalence of around 10.5% in 2021. Digital health applications (DiHA), which can be prescribed as certified medical devices in Germany, have been shown to effectively support disease management in patients with overweight and diabetes mellitus. However, little is known about DiHA-prescribing behavior of health care providers (HCPs) specializing in hormones and metabolism or about potential barriers to prescribing these applications.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to assess HCPs' experience with and willingness to prescribe DiHA in the field of hormones and metabolism. In addition, it sought to examine the patient-relevant health care effects that HCPs perceive as potentially achievable or have already observed with DiHA use, as well as the barriers they perceive to prescribing these applications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online questionnaire was developed based on preliminary studies and a literature review consisting of 86 items covering 6 key areas: experience and willingness to prescribe, health care effects, barriers, scientific evidence, digital affinity, and sociodemographics. The anonymous survey was distributed via the German Diabetes Association to 6035 HCPs in Germany between August 2 and October 9, 2024. Descriptive analyses, as well as correlation and regression analyses, were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 350 HCPs participated in the survey (response rate=5.8%). Although the low response rate may limit generalizability, the findings provide insights into prescribing behavior within this specialty. More than half (187/350, 53.4%) had never prescribed any of the 54 DiHA available at the time of the survey, with 47.6% (89/187) citing a lack of experience as the primary reason. Among those who had prescribed a DiHA (163/350, 46.6%), the majority (139/163, 85.3%) had prescribed 1 of the 8 DiHA available for obesity or diabetes mellitus. Looking ahead, 42.9% (149/348) of all surveyed HCPs stated that they were either very unlikely (83/348, 23.9%) or somewhat unlikely (66/348, 19%) to prescribe these DiHA in the next 12 months. The greatest perceived benefits of DiHA were improvements in self-management, health literacy, and adherence. The main barriers to prescribing DiHA in the field of hormones and metabolism included inadequate reimbursement for ancillary medical services, poor compatibility with existing practice software, and a lack of digital affinity or motivation among patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>DiHA have not yet been fully integrated into standard health care. To improve prescribing, we recommend integrating DiHA into medical guidelines, ensuring proper reimbursement, and involving HCPs in the pricing and health-economic evaluation of DiHA. The recommendati
{"title":"Prescribing Experiences, Potentials, and Challenges of Digital Health Applications in the Field of Hormones and Metabolism: Cross-Sectional Survey Study of Health Care Providers in Germany.","authors":"Melanie Mäder, Dirk Müller-Wieland, Tobias Wiesner, Tonio Schoenfelder, Carsta Militzer-Horstmann, Ria Heinrich, Mareike Geisler, Dennis Häckl","doi":"10.2196/77792","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2196/77792","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In 2020, the global prevalence of overweight and obesity was approximately 42%. One of the most common associated conditions is type 2 diabetes mellitus, which had a global prevalence of around 10.5% in 2021. Digital health applications (DiHA), which can be prescribed as certified medical devices in Germany, have been shown to effectively support disease management in patients with overweight and diabetes mellitus. However, little is known about DiHA-prescribing behavior of health care providers (HCPs) specializing in hormones and metabolism or about potential barriers to prescribing these applications.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to assess HCPs' experience with and willingness to prescribe DiHA in the field of hormones and metabolism. In addition, it sought to examine the patient-relevant health care effects that HCPs perceive as potentially achievable or have already observed with DiHA use, as well as the barriers they perceive to prescribing these applications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online questionnaire was developed based on preliminary studies and a literature review consisting of 86 items covering 6 key areas: experience and willingness to prescribe, health care effects, barriers, scientific evidence, digital affinity, and sociodemographics. The anonymous survey was distributed via the German Diabetes Association to 6035 HCPs in Germany between August 2 and October 9, 2024. Descriptive analyses, as well as correlation and regression analyses, were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 350 HCPs participated in the survey (response rate=5.8%). Although the low response rate may limit generalizability, the findings provide insights into prescribing behavior within this specialty. More than half (187/350, 53.4%) had never prescribed any of the 54 DiHA available at the time of the survey, with 47.6% (89/187) citing a lack of experience as the primary reason. Among those who had prescribed a DiHA (163/350, 46.6%), the majority (139/163, 85.3%) had prescribed 1 of the 8 DiHA available for obesity or diabetes mellitus. Looking ahead, 42.9% (149/348) of all surveyed HCPs stated that they were either very unlikely (83/348, 23.9%) or somewhat unlikely (66/348, 19%) to prescribe these DiHA in the next 12 months. The greatest perceived benefits of DiHA were improvements in self-management, health literacy, and adherence. The main barriers to prescribing DiHA in the field of hormones and metabolism included inadequate reimbursement for ancillary medical services, poor compatibility with existing practice software, and a lack of digital affinity or motivation among patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>DiHA have not yet been fully integrated into standard health care. To improve prescribing, we recommend integrating DiHA into medical guidelines, ensuring proper reimbursement, and involving HCPs in the pricing and health-economic evaluation of DiHA. The recommendati","PeriodicalId":14841,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Formative Research","volume":"9 ","pages":"e77792"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145878395","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Lauren Fothergill, Yvonne Latham, Niall Hayes, Carol Holland
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Proactive telecare offers services designed to reduce the occurrence of emergency situations by delivering proactive outbound calls and follow-ups and providing information and advice. By engaging regularly with users, proactive telecare may foster social connections with older adults and enable the detection of changes in needs. Telecare systems that promote active participation among older adults may also foster feelings of autonomy and self-management.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to (1) explore the acceptability and feasibility of delivering and evaluating a proactive telecare intervention to community-dwelling older adults prior to a potential effectiveness trial and (2) evaluate the proposed eligibility criteria and estimate the potential effect size of the impact of the intervention on health and well-being outcomes to inform sample size calculations for a future trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An 8-week randomized pre-post feasibility study was conducted. Using a mixed methods approach, questionnaires and semistructured interviews were used to explore the feasibility and acceptability of the study. The proactive telecare system encouraged users to press an OK button once a day to confirm their well-being. If they did not respond, participants received a well-being check, and emergency contacts were notified if required. Outcomes associated with independence, health, and well-being were measured using standardized questionnaires, including health-related quality of life, mental health, and loneliness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty older adults were recruited, with 13 randomized into the intervention group and 17 into the control group. The mean (SD) age of the participants was 75.4 (5.2) years; 66.7% (20/30) of the participants recruited had more than one health condition. This study achieved high retention rates (30/33, 90.9%); however, the expression of interest rate was low (52/295, 17.6%), indicating that changes to recruitment strategies are required. Effect sizes for all quantitative outcomes were small (approximately 0.2). Participants demonstrated high acceptance of the intervention, with the primary benefit cited as providing reassurance and promoting autonomy. Proactive engagement encouraged self-regulation and allowed users to control the level of support received. Those who were socially isolated reported feeling less lonely because of having additional social contact. Most participants felt the intervention would be particularly beneficial if they were experiencing poor health that significantly affected their daily activities, suggesting it may be more suited to those with limited independence. Some participants expressed anxiety about using the technology, primarily due to a lack of understanding and uncertainty in their perceived need for the device.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This proactive telecare system is feasible to deliver within a cohort
{"title":"Using a Proactive Telecare System to Support Independence, Health, and Well-Being in Older Adults: Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Lauren Fothergill, Yvonne Latham, Niall Hayes, Carol Holland","doi":"10.2196/82152","DOIUrl":"10.2196/82152","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Proactive telecare offers services designed to reduce the occurrence of emergency situations by delivering proactive outbound calls and follow-ups and providing information and advice. By engaging regularly with users, proactive telecare may foster social connections with older adults and enable the detection of changes in needs. Telecare systems that promote active participation among older adults may also foster feelings of autonomy and self-management.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to (1) explore the acceptability and feasibility of delivering and evaluating a proactive telecare intervention to community-dwelling older adults prior to a potential effectiveness trial and (2) evaluate the proposed eligibility criteria and estimate the potential effect size of the impact of the intervention on health and well-being outcomes to inform sample size calculations for a future trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An 8-week randomized pre-post feasibility study was conducted. Using a mixed methods approach, questionnaires and semistructured interviews were used to explore the feasibility and acceptability of the study. The proactive telecare system encouraged users to press an OK button once a day to confirm their well-being. If they did not respond, participants received a well-being check, and emergency contacts were notified if required. Outcomes associated with independence, health, and well-being were measured using standardized questionnaires, including health-related quality of life, mental health, and loneliness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty older adults were recruited, with 13 randomized into the intervention group and 17 into the control group. The mean (SD) age of the participants was 75.4 (5.2) years; 66.7% (20/30) of the participants recruited had more than one health condition. This study achieved high retention rates (30/33, 90.9%); however, the expression of interest rate was low (52/295, 17.6%), indicating that changes to recruitment strategies are required. Effect sizes for all quantitative outcomes were small (approximately 0.2). Participants demonstrated high acceptance of the intervention, with the primary benefit cited as providing reassurance and promoting autonomy. Proactive engagement encouraged self-regulation and allowed users to control the level of support received. Those who were socially isolated reported feeling less lonely because of having additional social contact. Most participants felt the intervention would be particularly beneficial if they were experiencing poor health that significantly affected their daily activities, suggesting it may be more suited to those with limited independence. Some participants expressed anxiety about using the technology, primarily due to a lack of understanding and uncertainty in their perceived need for the device.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This proactive telecare system is feasible to deliver within a cohort ","PeriodicalId":14841,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Formative Research","volume":"9 ","pages":"e82152"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12755204/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145878374","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: As a highly lethal circulatory failure syndrome, the pathophysiological mechanisms of shock can lead to multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS), which significantly increases the demand for intensive care and the length of hospitalization. There is therefore an urgent need for the public to be informed about health-related issues. In recent years, videos have become a significant medium for health education, and this study aimed to evaluate shock-related videos on video sharing platforms.
Objective: The objective of this study is to identify the top 100 videos related to impact on TikTok, Bilibili, and Xiaohongshu. These videos will then be assessed in terms of their effectiveness and credibility. Following this evaluation, relevant recommendations will be provided.
Methods: The study included a search for videos related to shock on the three video-sharing platforms: TikTok, Bilibili, and Xiaohongshu. The Global Quality Score (GQS) and mDISCERN tools were used to evaluate the credibility and quality of the videos, in addition to employing the Patient Education Materials Evaluation Tool for Audiovisual Content (PEMAT-A/V). Finally, the video was evaluated by examining disease definitions, clinical manifestations, risk factors, assessment, management, and outcomes.
Results: A total of 244 videos (TikTok:87, Bilibili:80, Xiaohongshu:77)were retrieved from the three platforms. The overall video quality was found to be moderately low. The majority of videos were uploaded by health advocates (n=102, 41.8%) and health professionals (n=98, 40.1%). The individual video sources of the GQS were of lower quality (1-3), the mDISCERN scores were moderate (2-4), and the quality of individual users is higher than that of organizational users. The PEMAT A/V scores were as follows: in the overall comprehensibility evaluation, 91% (220) videos of the scores were above 70%; in the actionability evaluation, 65% (157) videos of the scores were below 70%. It should be noted that the actionability scores for different video sources were generally low. In 172 videos (70.4%), the definition of shock and its clinical manifestations were explained in detail, while in 137 videos (56.1%), the definition of shock and its clinical manifestations were also clearly explained. The majority of videos provided a relatively comprehensive explanation of the definition of shock and its clinical signs and symptoms.
Conclusions: Our study have demonstrated that the content and information quality of shock videos is unsatisfactory, as a general rule. This underscores the necessity for pertinent regulatory bodies to oversee the caliber of health-related videos, and for content creators to enhance the quality of their content.
{"title":"Quality Assessment of Shock Videos on Video Sharing Platforms: Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Wenxin Wang, Luping Cheng, Xia Hu, Chuanliang Pan","doi":"10.2196/76715","DOIUrl":"10.2196/76715","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>As a highly lethal circulatory failure syndrome, the pathophysiological mechanisms of shock can lead to multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS), which significantly increases the demand for intensive care and the length of hospitalization. There is therefore an urgent need for the public to be informed about health-related issues. In recent years, videos have become a significant medium for health education, and this study aimed to evaluate shock-related videos on video sharing platforms.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study is to identify the top 100 videos related to impact on TikTok, Bilibili, and Xiaohongshu. These videos will then be assessed in terms of their effectiveness and credibility. Following this evaluation, relevant recommendations will be provided.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study included a search for videos related to shock on the three video-sharing platforms: TikTok, Bilibili, and Xiaohongshu. The Global Quality Score (GQS) and mDISCERN tools were used to evaluate the credibility and quality of the videos, in addition to employing the Patient Education Materials Evaluation Tool for Audiovisual Content (PEMAT-A/V). Finally, the video was evaluated by examining disease definitions, clinical manifestations, risk factors, assessment, management, and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 244 videos (TikTok:87, Bilibili:80, Xiaohongshu:77)were retrieved from the three platforms. The overall video quality was found to be moderately low. The majority of videos were uploaded by health advocates (n=102, 41.8%) and health professionals (n=98, 40.1%). The individual video sources of the GQS were of lower quality (1-3), the mDISCERN scores were moderate (2-4), and the quality of individual users is higher than that of organizational users. The PEMAT A/V scores were as follows: in the overall comprehensibility evaluation, 91% (220) videos of the scores were above 70%; in the actionability evaluation, 65% (157) videos of the scores were below 70%. It should be noted that the actionability scores for different video sources were generally low. In 172 videos (70.4%), the definition of shock and its clinical manifestations were explained in detail, while in 137 videos (56.1%), the definition of shock and its clinical manifestations were also clearly explained. The majority of videos provided a relatively comprehensive explanation of the definition of shock and its clinical signs and symptoms.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study have demonstrated that the content and information quality of shock videos is unsatisfactory, as a general rule. This underscores the necessity for pertinent regulatory bodies to oversee the caliber of health-related videos, and for content creators to enhance the quality of their content.</p>","PeriodicalId":14841,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Formative Research","volume":"9 ","pages":"e76715"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12753100/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145863006","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Maeve Brin, Thomas F Scherr, Janejira Chaiyasit, Jianfang Liu, Maura Abbott, Robert Garofalo, Lisa M Kuhns, Tess Sky, Ian Esliker, Rebecca Schnall
Background: HIV self-testing is an important strategy in the US Ending the HIV Epidemic initiative. To facilitate uptake of self-testing, we developed the mLab app, which complements existing self-test options to support the potential for higher uptake of the HIV self-test. Syphilis, a sexually transmitted infection with currently rising prevalence and overlap in risk profiles with HIV, could similarly benefit from the advantages of companion diagnostic mobile apps such as mLab. Due to the success of the mLab app in promoting HIV self-testing during a randomized controlled trial and the scientific evidence of need for at-home syphilis testing, our team developed the mLab+ app, which supports both HIV and syphilis testing through an image processing algorithm that incorporates a duplex HIV and syphilis point-of-care test.
Objective: We conducted a pilot study to assess the feasibility and usability of the mLab+ app for HIV and syphilis testing.
Methods: We recruited participants who were assigned male sex at birth and reported sex with another man. Participants came to the Nurse Practitioner Group clinic for baseline and follow-up visits. Participants rated the usability of the app using the Health Information Technology Usability Evaluation Scale and the Post-Study System Usability Questionnaire at their 3-month follow-up visit. The primary outcome was the number of participants who were able to self-administer the DPP HIV-Syphilis test with the assistance of the mLab+ app. Feasibility was measured through recruitment pace, retention over 3 months, app usability, and paradata.
Results: Of the 20 participants, 19 identified as male and 1 identified as nonbinary. Most participants (n=16) were able to complete the DPP HIV-Syphilis test with facilitation support from the mLab+ app. The average duration of an app session, from after authentication until log-out or abandonment, was 30 minutes and 33 seconds (SD 21 minutes and 40 seconds). Apart from the 27% (13/48) of sessions that were 5 minutes or less, the distribution of session durations was approximately normal. Users spent the longest time viewing testing screens (ie, timer screens, initial testing screen, test guided walkthroughs, test results, and picture and result upload). The overall mean scores on the Post-Study System Usability Questionnaire (2.65, SD 1.06) and Health Information Technology Usability Evaluation Scale (3.62, SD 1.07) indicated medium to high usability. The retention rate for the 3-month trial was 80% (16/20).
Conclusions: The findings support the use of the mLab+ app as a tool for assisting consumers in self-testing for HIV and syphilis. The limitations of the study design warrant further examination outside of clinic settings to better understand the utility of these tools for improving consumer health outcomes.
背景:艾滋病毒自我检测是美国结束艾滋病毒流行倡议的一项重要战略。为了促进自检的接受,我们开发了mLab应用程序,它补充了现有的自检选项,以支持更高的艾滋病毒自检接受率。梅毒是一种性传播感染,目前发病率不断上升,其风险与艾滋病毒有重叠,同样也可以从mLab等配套诊断移动应用程序的优势中受益。由于mLab应用程序在随机对照试验中促进艾滋病毒自我检测的成功以及需要在家进行梅毒检测的科学证据,我们的团队开发了mLab+应用程序,该应用程序通过包含双重艾滋病毒和梅毒护理点检测的图像处理算法支持艾滋病毒和梅毒检测。目的:我们进行了一项初步研究,以评估mLab+应用程序用于HIV和梅毒检测的可行性和可用性。方法:我们招募了出生时被指定为男性并报告与另一名男性发生过性关系的参与者。参与者来到执业护士小组诊所进行基线和随访。参与者在三个月的随访中使用健康信息技术可用性评估量表和研究后系统可用性问卷对应用程序的可用性进行评分。主要结果是能够在mLab+应用程序的帮助下自行进行DPP hiv -梅毒检测的参与者数量。可行性通过招募速度、3个月以上的保留率、应用程序可用性和para来衡量。结果:在20名参与者中,19名确定为男性,1名确定为非二元性别。大多数参与者(n=16)能够在mLab+应用程序的协助支持下完成DPP hiv -梅毒测试。从认证后到退出或放弃,应用程序会话的平均持续时间为30分33秒(SD为21分40秒)。除了27%(13/48)的会话为5分钟或更短,会话持续时间的分布大致为正态分布。用户花费最长的时间观看测试屏幕(即计时器屏幕、初始测试屏幕、测试指导演练、测试结果、图片和结果上传)。研究后系统可用性问卷(2.65,SD 1.06)和健康信息技术可用性评估量表(3.62,SD 1.07)的总体平均得分为中高可用性。3个月的保留率为80%(16/20)。结论:研究结果支持使用mLab+应用程序作为帮助消费者自我检测艾滋病毒和梅毒的工具。由于研究设计的局限性,需要在临床环境之外进行进一步的检查,以更好地了解这些工具在改善消费者健康结果方面的效用。
{"title":"Feasibility and Usability of an mHealth App (mLab+) to Guide Users Through HIV and Syphilis Self-Testing: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Maeve Brin, Thomas F Scherr, Janejira Chaiyasit, Jianfang Liu, Maura Abbott, Robert Garofalo, Lisa M Kuhns, Tess Sky, Ian Esliker, Rebecca Schnall","doi":"10.2196/72955","DOIUrl":"10.2196/72955","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>HIV self-testing is an important strategy in the US Ending the HIV Epidemic initiative. To facilitate uptake of self-testing, we developed the mLab app, which complements existing self-test options to support the potential for higher uptake of the HIV self-test. Syphilis, a sexually transmitted infection with currently rising prevalence and overlap in risk profiles with HIV, could similarly benefit from the advantages of companion diagnostic mobile apps such as mLab. Due to the success of the mLab app in promoting HIV self-testing during a randomized controlled trial and the scientific evidence of need for at-home syphilis testing, our team developed the mLab+ app, which supports both HIV and syphilis testing through an image processing algorithm that incorporates a duplex HIV and syphilis point-of-care test.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We conducted a pilot study to assess the feasibility and usability of the mLab+ app for HIV and syphilis testing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We recruited participants who were assigned male sex at birth and reported sex with another man. Participants came to the Nurse Practitioner Group clinic for baseline and follow-up visits. Participants rated the usability of the app using the Health Information Technology Usability Evaluation Scale and the Post-Study System Usability Questionnaire at their 3-month follow-up visit. The primary outcome was the number of participants who were able to self-administer the DPP HIV-Syphilis test with the assistance of the mLab+ app. Feasibility was measured through recruitment pace, retention over 3 months, app usability, and paradata.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 20 participants, 19 identified as male and 1 identified as nonbinary. Most participants (n=16) were able to complete the DPP HIV-Syphilis test with facilitation support from the mLab+ app. The average duration of an app session, from after authentication until log-out or abandonment, was 30 minutes and 33 seconds (SD 21 minutes and 40 seconds). Apart from the 27% (13/48) of sessions that were 5 minutes or less, the distribution of session durations was approximately normal. Users spent the longest time viewing testing screens (ie, timer screens, initial testing screen, test guided walkthroughs, test results, and picture and result upload). The overall mean scores on the Post-Study System Usability Questionnaire (2.65, SD 1.06) and Health Information Technology Usability Evaluation Scale (3.62, SD 1.07) indicated medium to high usability. The retention rate for the 3-month trial was 80% (16/20).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings support the use of the mLab+ app as a tool for assisting consumers in self-testing for HIV and syphilis. The limitations of the study design warrant further examination outside of clinic settings to better understand the utility of these tools for improving consumer health outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":14841,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Formative Research","volume":"9 ","pages":"e72955"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12753130/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145862928","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}