Pub Date : 2026-02-12DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2026.121398
Qiyue Qin, Jiaqi Li, Yaru Guo, Kongliang He
Objective: To examine the efficacy of intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) for depressive symptoms and anhedonia in adolescents with depression, and explore potential moderators of treatment response.
Methods: We conducted a randomized controlled trial enrolling 60 adolescents (11-19 years) with depression from a tertiary hospital in Anhui Province, China; with participant-and assessor-blinding, whereas TMS operators were not. Participants were allocated by an independent researcher using a computer-generated random number list to active iTBS (n = 30) or sham stimulation (n = 30). The intervention was delivered over two weeks (10 treatment days), with three sessions per weekday(30 sessions total). Clinical assessments were performed at baseline and post-intervention using standardized instruments: the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale-17 items (HAMD-17), Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale-14 items (HAMA-14), and Temporal Experience of Pleasure Scale (TEPS). Treatment effects were examined using 2 × 2 repeated-measures ANOVA, and exploratory moderation was examined using PROCESS Model 1 with 5000 bootstrap resamples, with Holm-Bonferroni correction applied across five interaction tests.
Results: Baseline clinical scale scores were comparable between groups (P > 0.05). Following treatment, significant group× time interactions indicated greater improvement in the active iTBS group than sham on depressive symptoms (HAMD-17: F = 40.300, P < 0.001) and anxiety symptoms (HAMA-14: F = 23.802, P < 0.001). Significant group× time interactions were also observed for TEPS total and its four subscales (P < 0.05). In exploratory moderation analyses, the Group×baseline TEPS-AA interaction was nominally significant(P = 0.014) but did not survive Holm-Bonferroni correction(adjusted P = 0.070).
Conclusion: iTBS was feasible and associated with greater short-term improvements in depressive symptoms and anhedonia in adolescents compared with sham stimulation. Exploratory analyses indicated that baseline hedonic traits (particularly abstract anticipatory pleasure) may be related to differential treatment response, but moderation effects should be interpreted cautiously given multiple-testing correction and require confirmation in adequately powered trials with longer follow-up. These findings support further investigation of iTBS for adolescent depression and the prospective evaluation of candidate predictors of response. Generalizability may be limited by the single-center design and the accelerated treatment schedule.
目的:观察间歇性θ波爆发刺激(iTBS)对青少年抑郁症抑郁症状和快感缺乏症的治疗效果,并探讨治疗反应的潜在调节因子。方法:我们进行了一项随机对照试验,从中国安徽省的一家三级医院招募60名患有抑郁症的青少年(11-19 岁);参与者和评估者采用盲法,而TMS操作者则没有。参与者由独立研究人员使用计算机生成的随机数列表分配到激活iTBS (n = 30)或假刺激(n = 30)。干预为期两周(10个治疗日),每个工作日进行三次治疗(总共30次)。在基线和干预后使用标准化工具进行临床评估:汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表-17项(HAMD-17),汉密尔顿焦虑评定量表-14项(HAMA-14)和快乐时间体验量表(TEPS)。使用2 × 2重复测量方差分析检验治疗效果,并使用5000个bootstrap样本的PROCESS Model 1检验探索性调节,在5个相互作用检验中应用Holm-Bonferroni校正。结果:两组间基线临床量表评分具有可比性(P > 0.05)。治疗后,显著的组时间相互作用表明,活跃iTBS组抑郁症状的改善大于假刺激组(HAMD-17: F = 40.300,P )。结论:iTBS是可行的,与假刺激相比,iTBS在青少年抑郁症状和快感缺乏方面有更大的短期改善。探索性分析表明,基线享乐特征(特别是抽象的预期愉悦)可能与不同的治疗反应有关,但在多重测试校正的情况下,适度效应应谨慎解释,并需要在长期随访的充分有力的试验中得到证实。这些发现支持了iTBS治疗青少年抑郁症的进一步研究,以及对候选反应预测因子的前瞻性评估。可推广性可能受到单中心设计和加速治疗计划的限制。
{"title":"Efficacy of iTBS in adolescent depression: effects on anhedonia and exploratory moderation analyses.","authors":"Qiyue Qin, Jiaqi Li, Yaru Guo, Kongliang He","doi":"10.1016/j.jad.2026.121398","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2026.121398","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the efficacy of intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) for depressive symptoms and anhedonia in adolescents with depression, and explore potential moderators of treatment response.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a randomized controlled trial enrolling 60 adolescents (11-19 years) with depression from a tertiary hospital in Anhui Province, China; with participant-and assessor-blinding, whereas TMS operators were not. Participants were allocated by an independent researcher using a computer-generated random number list to active iTBS (n = 30) or sham stimulation (n = 30). The intervention was delivered over two weeks (10 treatment days), with three sessions per weekday(30 sessions total). Clinical assessments were performed at baseline and post-intervention using standardized instruments: the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale-17 items (HAMD-17), Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale-14 items (HAMA-14), and Temporal Experience of Pleasure Scale (TEPS). Treatment effects were examined using 2 × 2 repeated-measures ANOVA, and exploratory moderation was examined using PROCESS Model 1 with 5000 bootstrap resamples, with Holm-Bonferroni correction applied across five interaction tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline clinical scale scores were comparable between groups (P > 0.05). Following treatment, significant group× time interactions indicated greater improvement in the active iTBS group than sham on depressive symptoms (HAMD-17: F = 40.300, P < 0.001) and anxiety symptoms (HAMA-14: F = 23.802, P < 0.001). Significant group× time interactions were also observed for TEPS total and its four subscales (P < 0.05). In exploratory moderation analyses, the Group×baseline TEPS-AA interaction was nominally significant(P = 0.014) but did not survive Holm-Bonferroni correction(adjusted P = 0.070).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>iTBS was feasible and associated with greater short-term improvements in depressive symptoms and anhedonia in adolescents compared with sham stimulation. Exploratory analyses indicated that baseline hedonic traits (particularly abstract anticipatory pleasure) may be related to differential treatment response, but moderation effects should be interpreted cautiously given multiple-testing correction and require confirmation in adequately powered trials with longer follow-up. These findings support further investigation of iTBS for adolescent depression and the prospective evaluation of candidate predictors of response. Generalizability may be limited by the single-center design and the accelerated treatment schedule.</p>","PeriodicalId":14963,"journal":{"name":"Journal of affective disorders","volume":" ","pages":"121398"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146197624","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-12DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2026.121387
Gyujoon Hwang, Nutta-On Blair, Stacy A Claesges, Charles F Reynolds, Christos Davatzikos, Joseph S Goveas
Background: Prolonged Grief Disorder (PGD) in later life may involve volumetric patterns indicative of accelerated brain aging. This study examined whether structural brain age differs between individuals with PGD and those with integrated grief (IG), and whether it is associated with clinical severity.
Methods: Chronically grieving older adults with PGD (n = 36) and IG (n = 56), equated on demographics and time since loss, underwent structural MRI. Machine learning-derived indices were computed for each participant: Brain Age Gap (SPARE-BAG), Alzheimer's disease-like atrophy (SPARE-AD), and five dominant brain aging patterns. Group differences and associations with symptom severity were assessed, along with moderation by age, cognitive status, medical burden, and current and past depression.
Results: Compared to IG, the PGD group showed significantly higher SPARE-BAG (t = 2.61, pcorrected = 0.021), SPARE-AD (t = 2.04, pcorrected = 0.045), and medial temporal lobe atrophy pattern (t = 3.44, pcorrected = 0.005). However, these findings were attenuated and no longer significant after accounting for comorbid depressive symptoms. In the PGD group, both SPARE scores positively correlated with grief and depressive symptom severity (pcorrected < 0.03). The SPARE-BAG-grief symptom association was moderated by younger age (z = -2.92, pFDR = 0.018) and higher depressive symptoms (z = 1.88, p = 0.061); SPARE-AD-depressive symptom correlation was moderated by past depression history (z = 2.64, pcorrected = 0.041).
Conclusion: Adults with PGD exhibit structural brain patterns consistent with accelerated and AD-like aging. However, these findings were largely driven by comorbid depressive symptoms. The brain aging indices were associated with both grief and depressive symptom severity, highlighting the cumulative neurobiological burden associated with PGD and co-occurring depression and underscoring the need for integrative clinical approaches addressing both conditions.
{"title":"Accelerated brain aging in prolonged grief disorder of later life: Influence of comorbid depression.","authors":"Gyujoon Hwang, Nutta-On Blair, Stacy A Claesges, Charles F Reynolds, Christos Davatzikos, Joseph S Goveas","doi":"10.1016/j.jad.2026.121387","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2026.121387","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prolonged Grief Disorder (PGD) in later life may involve volumetric patterns indicative of accelerated brain aging. This study examined whether structural brain age differs between individuals with PGD and those with integrated grief (IG), and whether it is associated with clinical severity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Chronically grieving older adults with PGD (n = 36) and IG (n = 56), equated on demographics and time since loss, underwent structural MRI. Machine learning-derived indices were computed for each participant: Brain Age Gap (SPARE-BAG), Alzheimer's disease-like atrophy (SPARE-AD), and five dominant brain aging patterns. Group differences and associations with symptom severity were assessed, along with moderation by age, cognitive status, medical burden, and current and past depression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to IG, the PGD group showed significantly higher SPARE-BAG (t = 2.61, p<sub>corrected</sub> = 0.021), SPARE-AD (t = 2.04, p<sub>corrected</sub> = 0.045), and medial temporal lobe atrophy pattern (t = 3.44, p<sub>corrected</sub> = 0.005). However, these findings were attenuated and no longer significant after accounting for comorbid depressive symptoms. In the PGD group, both SPARE scores positively correlated with grief and depressive symptom severity (p<sub>corrected</sub> < 0.03). The SPARE-BAG-grief symptom association was moderated by younger age (z = -2.92, p<sub>FDR</sub> = 0.018) and higher depressive symptoms (z = 1.88, p = 0.061); SPARE-AD-depressive symptom correlation was moderated by past depression history (z = 2.64, p<sub>corrected</sub> = 0.041).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Adults with PGD exhibit structural brain patterns consistent with accelerated and AD-like aging. However, these findings were largely driven by comorbid depressive symptoms. The brain aging indices were associated with both grief and depressive symptom severity, highlighting the cumulative neurobiological burden associated with PGD and co-occurring depression and underscoring the need for integrative clinical approaches addressing both conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":14963,"journal":{"name":"Journal of affective disorders","volume":" ","pages":"121387"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146197626","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-11DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2026.121377
Tiffany Milligan, Reshmi Nair, Kiriana Cowansage, Courtney Boyd, Maria A. Morgan, Daniel Kotzab, Dawn M. Bellanti, Lisa M. Shank, Dan E. Berman, Sharmila Chari, Daniel P. Evatt, Marija S. Kelber
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) global pandemic was a time of uncertainty and rapid change that has had demonstrable effects on the mental health of those who experienced it. For individuals who contracted the illness, some types of risk factors for adverse mental health post-COVID have been examined (e.g., demographics), but how pre-COVID psychiatric risk factors may have contributed to worsened outcomes has not been systematically evaluated. This systematic review and meta-analysis examines mental health risk factors (e.g., general psychiatric history, trauma history) for depression, anxiety, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and adjustment disorder in individuals after resolution of acute COVID-19 infection. We searched three databases (PubMed, PsycInfo, Scopus) and included 27 studies (15 cohort, 12 cross-sectional). Studies were dually extracted and assessed for quality. We conducted meta-analyses by study design and outcome for the risk factor of a general psychiatric history. Medium-to-large effect sizes were found for psychiatric history on post-COVID infection depression, anxiety, and PTSD. No studies examined adjustment disorder as an outcome. Studies of mental health risk factors that could not be incorporated into the meta-analyses (e.g., history of trauma) showed small-to-large effect sizes on post-COVID mental health. These results consistently show that mental health factors predict worse psychological health after acute COVID-19 infection. More robust study designs would improve this body of research.
{"title":"Mental health risk factors for psychological disorders after COVID-19 infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Tiffany Milligan, Reshmi Nair, Kiriana Cowansage, Courtney Boyd, Maria A. Morgan, Daniel Kotzab, Dawn M. Bellanti, Lisa M. Shank, Dan E. Berman, Sharmila Chari, Daniel P. Evatt, Marija S. Kelber","doi":"10.1016/j.jad.2026.121377","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jad.2026.121377","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) global pandemic was a time of uncertainty and rapid change that has had demonstrable effects on the mental health of those who experienced it. For individuals who contracted the illness, some types of risk factors for adverse mental health post-COVID have been examined (e.g., demographics), but how pre-COVID psychiatric risk factors may have contributed to worsened outcomes has not been systematically evaluated. This systematic review and meta-analysis examines mental health risk factors (e.g., general psychiatric history, trauma history) for depression, anxiety, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and adjustment disorder in individuals after resolution of acute COVID-19 infection. We searched three databases (PubMed, PsycInfo, Scopus) and included 27 studies (15 cohort, 12 cross-sectional). Studies were dually extracted and assessed for quality. We conducted meta-analyses by study design and outcome for the risk factor of a general psychiatric history. Medium-to-large effect sizes were found for psychiatric history on post-COVID infection depression, anxiety, and PTSD. No studies examined adjustment disorder as an outcome. Studies of mental health risk factors that could not be incorporated into the meta-analyses (e.g., history of trauma) showed small-to-large effect sizes on post-COVID mental health. These results consistently show that mental health factors predict worse psychological health after acute COVID-19 infection. More robust study designs would improve this body of research.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14963,"journal":{"name":"Journal of affective disorders","volume":"402 ","pages":"Article 121377"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146191418","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-11DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2026.121371
Dimitrios Adamis , Jan Willem van Dalen , Piet Eikelenboom
Background
Post-operative delirium (POD) in older adults may be linked to preoperative depression via shared biological pathways. This review synthesizes current findings, highlights methodological gaps and suggests possible pathophysiological mechanisms.
Methods
Searches across major databases identified eligible studies using validated tools. Standardized mean differences (SMD) and log odds ratios were pooled using random-effects models. Heterogeneity, moderators, and publication bias were assessed using meta-regression and sensitivity analyses in R (metafor package).
Results
This meta-analysis synthesized findings from 42 studies examining the association between preoperative depression and postoperative delirium (POD), analysing categorical (k = 16) and continuous (k = 26) reported depression data from 9701 patients. Preoperative depression was significantly associated with increased POD risk (OR = 2.50, 95% CI: 1.90–3.28; SMD = 0.49, 95% CI: 0.26–0.73 after outlier removal). Surgical cohort type and depression assessment tools significantly moderated this association. Cognition evaluated by the MMSE did not significantly influence outcomes. Geriatric depression scale (GDS-15) emerged as a consistent predictor, prompting further investigation into optimal cutoff scores for POD risk stratification. Publication bias and heterogeneity were low to moderate.
Discussion
This meta-analysis confirms preoperative depression, including subclinical symptoms, as a significant predictor of POD. Findings highlight the roles of surgical type and depressive symptoms, suggesting tailored screening and further research into symptom-specific risk pathways.
Conclusion
Preoperative depression predicts POD. Notably, even GDS-15 scores below the conventional cutoff for depression were associated with increased delirium risk. This finding requires further investigation, including exploration of potential underlying mechanisms such as vascular or other symptom-specific pathways.
{"title":"Depressive symptoms as a risk factor for postoperative delirium in older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Dimitrios Adamis , Jan Willem van Dalen , Piet Eikelenboom","doi":"10.1016/j.jad.2026.121371","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jad.2026.121371","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Post-operative delirium (POD) in older adults may be linked to preoperative depression via shared biological pathways. This review synthesizes current findings, highlights methodological gaps and suggests possible pathophysiological mechanisms.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Searches across major databases identified eligible studies using validated tools. Standardized mean differences (SMD) and log odds ratios were pooled using random-effects models. Heterogeneity, moderators, and publication bias were assessed using meta-regression and sensitivity analyses in R (metafor package).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>This meta-analysis synthesized findings from 42 studies examining the association between preoperative depression and postoperative delirium (POD), analysing categorical (k = 16) and continuous (k = 26) reported depression data from 9701 patients. Preoperative depression was significantly associated with increased POD risk (OR = 2.50, 95% CI: 1.90–3.28; SMD = 0.49, 95% CI: 0.26–0.73 after outlier removal). Surgical cohort type and depression assessment tools significantly moderated this association. Cognition evaluated by the MMSE did not significantly influence outcomes. Geriatric depression scale (GDS-15) emerged as a consistent predictor, prompting further investigation into optimal cutoff scores for POD risk stratification. Publication bias and heterogeneity were low to moderate.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>This meta-analysis confirms preoperative depression, including subclinical symptoms, as a significant predictor of POD. Findings highlight the roles of surgical type and depressive symptoms, suggesting tailored screening and further research into symptom-specific risk pathways.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Preoperative depression predicts POD. Notably, even GDS-15 scores below the conventional cutoff for depression were associated with increased delirium risk. This finding requires further investigation, including exploration of potential underlying mechanisms such as vascular or other symptom-specific pathways.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14963,"journal":{"name":"Journal of affective disorders","volume":"402 ","pages":"Article 121371"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146191419","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-11DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2026.121375
Luigi F Saccaro, Alexis E Giff, Zamfira Parincu, Camille Piguet, Christian Greiner, Paco Prada
Introduction: Suicide is a leading cause of premature death, with risk peaking around psychiatric hospitalization. Emotion dysregulation (ED) is recognized as a key factor contributing to suicidal ideation and behavior across psychiatric diagnoses. The efficacy of interventions that target ED for suicidality reduction remains unclear, so we aimed to assess these interventions in psychiatric inpatients.
Methods: We conducted a PRISMA-compliant, PROSPERO-registered (CRD420251140949) systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and non-randomized trials evaluating interventions targeting emotion regulation (ER) for psychiatric inpatients with suicidal ideation and/or behavior. Searches covered PubMed, Embase, and PsycINFO to September 18, 2025. Standardized mean differences (Hedges' g) were pooled under random-effects models and heterogeneity was assessed (Q, I2, τ2). Exploratory meta-regressions examined age, sex, and study quality; small-study effects were explored with funnel plots.
Results: Twelve studies met inclusion (n = 1708), spanning dialectical behavior therapy (DBT), mindfulness-based interventions, acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT), and other ER-related protocols. Across modalities, feasibility and acceptability were high and interventions consistently improved suicide-related outcomes in transdiagnostic adolescents and adult populations. Suicide attempts and ideation met outcome criteria for exploratory meta-analyses, and, for both, ER-targeted interventions outperformed usual care, despite heterogeneity and small samples. Exploratory meta-regressions were non-significant; funnel plots did not suggest marked publication bias, though power was limited.
Conclusions: ER-targeted interventions delivered during psychiatric hospitalization are feasible and show promising benefits on suicide-related outcomes. Given heterogeneity and limited sample sizes, larger, well-powered randomized trials using standardized suicidality endpoints are needed to establish efficacy, refine inpatient protocols, and inform acute care pathways.
{"title":"Emotion regulation-targeted interventions initiated during hospitalization for suicidal crisis: a systematic review and exploratory meta-analysis.","authors":"Luigi F Saccaro, Alexis E Giff, Zamfira Parincu, Camille Piguet, Christian Greiner, Paco Prada","doi":"10.1016/j.jad.2026.121375","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2026.121375","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Suicide is a leading cause of premature death, with risk peaking around psychiatric hospitalization. Emotion dysregulation (ED) is recognized as a key factor contributing to suicidal ideation and behavior across psychiatric diagnoses. The efficacy of interventions that target ED for suicidality reduction remains unclear, so we aimed to assess these interventions in psychiatric inpatients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a PRISMA-compliant, PROSPERO-registered (CRD420251140949) systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and non-randomized trials evaluating interventions targeting emotion regulation (ER) for psychiatric inpatients with suicidal ideation and/or behavior. Searches covered PubMed, Embase, and PsycINFO to September 18, 2025. Standardized mean differences (Hedges' g) were pooled under random-effects models and heterogeneity was assessed (Q, I<sup>2</sup>, τ<sup>2</sup>). Exploratory meta-regressions examined age, sex, and study quality; small-study effects were explored with funnel plots.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve studies met inclusion (n = 1708), spanning dialectical behavior therapy (DBT), mindfulness-based interventions, acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT), and other ER-related protocols. Across modalities, feasibility and acceptability were high and interventions consistently improved suicide-related outcomes in transdiagnostic adolescents and adult populations. Suicide attempts and ideation met outcome criteria for exploratory meta-analyses, and, for both, ER-targeted interventions outperformed usual care, despite heterogeneity and small samples. Exploratory meta-regressions were non-significant; funnel plots did not suggest marked publication bias, though power was limited.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ER-targeted interventions delivered during psychiatric hospitalization are feasible and show promising benefits on suicide-related outcomes. Given heterogeneity and limited sample sizes, larger, well-powered randomized trials using standardized suicidality endpoints are needed to establish efficacy, refine inpatient protocols, and inform acute care pathways.</p>","PeriodicalId":14963,"journal":{"name":"Journal of affective disorders","volume":" ","pages":"121375"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146194620","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Speech encodes emotional, cognitive, and motor states, offering an objective, non-invasive window into mental health. In major depressive disorder (MDD), vocal alterations are reported, yet their cross-dataset reproducibility, symptom specificity, and longitudinal stability remain uncertain, especially under naturalistic, content-variable speech tasks. We conducted a large, multi-cohort study of 1857 participants spanning a primary discovery dataset, an independent secondary clinical dataset, and an 8-week longitudinal follow-up. From standardized recordings we extracted 6373 acoustic features and examined (i) baseline case-control screening in each dataset, (ii) severity-related feature patterns across depression levels, (iii) symptom-dimension markers using stability-enhanced elastic net, and (iv) longitudinal feature changes over 8 weeks, integrating unsupervised clustering and mediation analyses, with false discovery rate control. Across cohorts, correlation-based redundancy reduction yielded a compact final set of 23 non-redundant representative features for cross-cohort reporting and interpretation. Symptom-factor analysis identified distinct, non-overlapping feature sets for HAMD-24 dimensions, with somatic and depressed mood yielding the most stable markers. Longitudinally, 38 features exhibited heterogeneous recovery trajectories and mediation patterns consistent with symptom improvement, with spectral-shape and modulation markers showing higher temporal sensitivity than energy and voice-quality features. Overall, our findings indicate that a compact set of speech-derived markers can support symptom-informed monitoring in MDD. A small subset of acoustic features is robust, symptom-specific, and temporally informative, refining assumptions of uniform vocal change and enabling targeted, symptom-informed speech biomarkers for personalized monitoring and early intervention. Future work should verify these markers using task-matched speech prompts and alternative feature representations, given potential content-related confounding in free-response speech and reported reliability limitations of some high-dimensional acoustic feature toolkits. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ChiCTR2500095151.
{"title":"Speech-derived acoustic biomarkers for depression: Comprehensive cross-section and longitudinal analyses in different cohorts.","authors":"Yunhan Lin, Biman Najika Liyanage, Chenyang Xu, Zhengwen Zhu, Yundan Liao, Jun Yang, Yanbao Tao, Zongfeng Li, Chuan Shi, Weihua Yue","doi":"10.1016/j.jad.2026.121374","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2026.121374","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Speech encodes emotional, cognitive, and motor states, offering an objective, non-invasive window into mental health. In major depressive disorder (MDD), vocal alterations are reported, yet their cross-dataset reproducibility, symptom specificity, and longitudinal stability remain uncertain, especially under naturalistic, content-variable speech tasks. We conducted a large, multi-cohort study of 1857 participants spanning a primary discovery dataset, an independent secondary clinical dataset, and an 8-week longitudinal follow-up. From standardized recordings we extracted 6373 acoustic features and examined (i) baseline case-control screening in each dataset, (ii) severity-related feature patterns across depression levels, (iii) symptom-dimension markers using stability-enhanced elastic net, and (iv) longitudinal feature changes over 8 weeks, integrating unsupervised clustering and mediation analyses, with false discovery rate control. Across cohorts, correlation-based redundancy reduction yielded a compact final set of 23 non-redundant representative features for cross-cohort reporting and interpretation. Symptom-factor analysis identified distinct, non-overlapping feature sets for HAMD-24 dimensions, with somatic and depressed mood yielding the most stable markers. Longitudinally, 38 features exhibited heterogeneous recovery trajectories and mediation patterns consistent with symptom improvement, with spectral-shape and modulation markers showing higher temporal sensitivity than energy and voice-quality features. Overall, our findings indicate that a compact set of speech-derived markers can support symptom-informed monitoring in MDD. A small subset of acoustic features is robust, symptom-specific, and temporally informative, refining assumptions of uniform vocal change and enabling targeted, symptom-informed speech biomarkers for personalized monitoring and early intervention. Future work should verify these markers using task-matched speech prompts and alternative feature representations, given potential content-related confounding in free-response speech and reported reliability limitations of some high-dimensional acoustic feature toolkits. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ChiCTR2500095151.</p>","PeriodicalId":14963,"journal":{"name":"Journal of affective disorders","volume":" ","pages":"121374"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146194526","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-10DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2026.121379
Mingqi Wang , Benke Xu , Chenxi Zhang , Naixue Cui , Guoxiao Sun
Background
eHealth has received growing attention as a promising and accessible paradigm for delivering mental health services among older adults with subthreshold depression (sD).
Objective
This study aimed to comprehensively synthesize effects of eHealth interventions on depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms, and quality of life (QoL) in older adults with sD, as well as potential moderators that influence the effects.
Methods
A comprehensive search of five databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, PsycINFO, and Scopus) was conducted to identify relevant randomized controlled trials. The primary outcome (depressive symptoms) and secondary outcomes (anxiety symptoms and QoL) were synthesized using random-effects meta-analysis models. Subgroup analyses and meta-regressions were used to identify factors associated with the intervention effects on primary outcome.
Results
32 trials (3973 participants) were included. eHealth interventions were effective in improving depressive symptoms (g = −0.35, 95% CI −0.45 to −0.24), anxiety symptoms (g = −0.47, 95% CI −0.73 to −0.20), and QoL (g = 0.21, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.34) in older adults with sD. Subgroup analyses revealed that virtual reality-based interventions were the most effective eHealth component (g = −1.08, 95% CI −1.59 to −0.56). Greater improvements in depressive symptoms were also observed in participants without comorbid conditions, receiving single-component intervention, or undergoing shorter intervention durations. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the reliability of these results.
Conclusion
eHealth interventions are effective in improving mental health and QoL in older adults with sD. Further high-quality trials should evaluate their sustained effects and validate the optimal delivery formats for older adults with sD.
背景:电子健康作为一种有前途和可获得的范式,为患有阈下抑郁症(sD)的老年人提供心理健康服务,已受到越来越多的关注。目的:本研究旨在全面综合eHealth干预对老年sD患者抑郁症状、焦虑症状和生活质量(QoL)的影响,以及影响这些影响的潜在调节因子。方法:综合检索MEDLINE、Embase、Web of Science、PsycINFO、Scopus 5个数据库,筛选相关随机对照试验。主要结局(抑郁症状)和次要结局(焦虑症状和生活质量)采用随机效应荟萃分析模型进行综合。采用亚组分析和元回归来确定与干预对主要结局的影响相关的因素。结果:纳入32项试验(3973名受试者)。电子健康干预在改善老年sD患者的抑郁症状(g = -0.35,95% CI -0.45至-0.24)、焦虑症状(g = -0.47,95% CI -0.73至-0.20)和生活质量(g = 0.21,95% CI 0.08至0.34)方面是有效的。亚组分析显示,基于虚拟现实的干预措施是最有效的电子健康成分(g = -1.08,95% CI -1.59至-0.56)。在没有合并症、接受单一成分干预或接受较短干预时间的参与者中,也观察到抑郁症状的更大改善。敏感性分析证实了这些结果的可靠性。结论:电子健康干预能有效改善老年sD患者的心理健康和生活质量。进一步的高质量试验应评估其持续效果,并验证老年sD患者的最佳给药方式。
{"title":"The effect of eHealth interventions on mental health and quality of life in older adults with subthreshold depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Mingqi Wang , Benke Xu , Chenxi Zhang , Naixue Cui , Guoxiao Sun","doi":"10.1016/j.jad.2026.121379","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jad.2026.121379","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>eHealth has received growing attention as a promising and accessible paradigm for delivering mental health services among older adults with subthreshold depression (sD).</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aimed to comprehensively synthesize effects of eHealth interventions on depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms, and quality of life (QoL) in older adults with sD, as well as potential moderators that influence the effects.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A comprehensive search of five databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, PsycINFO, and Scopus) was conducted to identify relevant randomized controlled trials. The primary outcome (depressive symptoms) and secondary outcomes (anxiety symptoms and QoL) were synthesized using random-effects meta-analysis models. Subgroup analyses and meta-regressions were used to identify factors associated with the intervention effects on primary outcome.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>32 trials (3973 participants) were included. eHealth interventions were effective in improving depressive symptoms (g = −0.35, 95% CI −0.45 to −0.24), anxiety symptoms (g = −0.47, 95% CI −0.73 to −0.20), and QoL (g = 0.21, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.34) in older adults with sD. Subgroup analyses revealed that virtual reality-based interventions were the most effective eHealth component (g = −1.08, 95% CI −1.59 to −0.56). Greater improvements in depressive symptoms were also observed in participants without comorbid conditions, receiving single-component intervention, or undergoing shorter intervention durations. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the reliability of these results.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>eHealth interventions are effective in improving mental health and QoL in older adults with sD. Further high-quality trials should evaluate their sustained effects and validate the optimal delivery formats for older adults with sD.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14963,"journal":{"name":"Journal of affective disorders","volume":"402 ","pages":"Article 121379"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146179925","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-10DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2026.121378
Xusheng Zhang , Yang Chen , Renhao Deng , Shiwan Tao , Min Zou , Qiang Wang
Background and purpose
Insomnia is a common symptom in depressive disorder, affecting up to 80% of those patients. Evidences suggest that sleep symptom improvements could alleviating depressive symptoms and reducing relapse. This article evaluated the efficacy of three antidepressants—agomelatine, mirtazapine, and trazodone—in treating insomnia symptoms in depressed patients, with a focus on polysomnographic (PSG) data, subjective sleep experience, improvement in depressive symptoms, and adverse drug reactions.
Methods
A systematic search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science was conducted for studies published from 1974 to August 2025; 30 studies (16 randomized controlled trials and 14 non-randomized controlled trials) were included. The primary outcomes were PSG measures; secondary outcomes included PSQI and HAMD scores, as well as adverse medication reactions.
Results
The PSG results showed that agomelatine may not significantly change percentage N1 of sleep period time (N1%) and Latency of REM sleep (L-REM). Mirtazapine significantly increased total sleep time (TST), slow-wave sleep of sleep period time (SWS%), and sleep efficiency (SE%), while reducing percentage wake after sleep onset of sleep period time (WASO%). Trazodone notably improved TST, and SE%. For adverse effects, agomelatine was well-tolerated; mirtazapine commonly caused weight gain and sedation; and trazodone frequently led to dizziness, sedation, headache, nausea, and somnolence.
Conclusion
All three medications significantly enhance subjective sleep perception and alleviate depressive symptoms. However, agomelatine may lack a definitive effect on improving objective sleep parameters in depressed patients. Future studies should involve larger, high-quality trials with unified methodologies to strengthen the reliability of conclusions.
背景与目的:失眠是抑郁症的常见症状,影响到80%的抑郁症患者。有证据表明,改善睡眠症状可以减轻抑郁症状,减少复发。本文评估了三种抗抑郁药——阿戈美拉汀、米氮平和曲唑酮治疗抑郁症患者失眠症状的疗效,重点关注了多导睡眠图(PSG)数据、主观睡眠体验、抑郁症状的改善和药物不良反应。方法:系统检索PubMed、Cochrane Library、MEDLINE、Embase和Web of Science,检索1974年至2025年8月间发表的研究;纳入30项研究(16项随机对照试验和14项非随机对照试验)。主要结局为PSG测量;次要结局包括PSQI和HAMD评分,以及药物不良反应。结果:PSG结果显示阿戈美拉汀对睡眠时间N1百分比(N1%)和快速眼动睡眠潜伏期(L-REM)无显著影响。米氮平显著增加了总睡眠时间(TST)、慢波睡眠时间(SWS%)和睡眠效率(SE%),同时降低了睡眠后醒觉率(WASO%)。曲唑酮显著改善TST和SE%。对于不良反应,阿戈美拉汀耐受性良好;米氮平通常会导致体重增加和镇静;曲唑酮常导致头晕、镇静、头痛、恶心和嗜睡。结论:三种药物均能显著增强主观睡眠知觉,减轻抑郁症状。然而,阿戈美拉汀在改善抑郁症患者客观睡眠参数方面可能缺乏明确的效果。未来的研究应采用统一的方法进行更大规模、高质量的试验,以加强结论的可靠性。
{"title":"Management of insomnia symptoms in depressed patients treated with agomelatine, mirtazapine and trazodone: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Xusheng Zhang , Yang Chen , Renhao Deng , Shiwan Tao , Min Zou , Qiang Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.jad.2026.121378","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jad.2026.121378","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and purpose</h3><div>Insomnia is a common symptom in depressive disorder, affecting up to 80% of those patients. Evidences suggest that sleep symptom improvements could alleviating depressive symptoms and reducing relapse. This article evaluated the efficacy of three antidepressants—agomelatine, mirtazapine, and trazodone—in treating insomnia symptoms in depressed patients, with a focus on polysomnographic (PSG) data, subjective sleep experience, improvement in depressive symptoms, and adverse drug reactions.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A systematic search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science was conducted for studies published from 1974 to August 2025; 30 studies (16 randomized controlled trials and 14 non-randomized controlled trials) were included. The primary outcomes were PSG measures; secondary outcomes included PSQI and HAMD scores, as well as adverse medication reactions.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The PSG results showed that agomelatine may not significantly change percentage N1 of sleep period time (N1%) and Latency of REM sleep (L-REM). Mirtazapine significantly increased total sleep time (TST), slow-wave sleep of sleep period time (SWS%), and sleep efficiency (SE%), while reducing percentage wake after sleep onset of sleep period time (WASO%). Trazodone notably improved TST, and SE%. For adverse effects, agomelatine was well-tolerated; mirtazapine commonly caused weight gain and sedation; and trazodone frequently led to dizziness, sedation, headache, nausea, and somnolence.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>All three medications significantly enhance subjective sleep perception and alleviate depressive symptoms. However, agomelatine may lack a definitive effect on improving objective sleep parameters in depressed patients. Future studies should involve larger, high-quality trials with unified methodologies to strengthen the reliability of conclusions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14963,"journal":{"name":"Journal of affective disorders","volume":"402 ","pages":"Article 121378"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146179944","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Anxiety symptoms are highly prevalent in major depressive disorder (MDD) and significantly influence clinical outcomes, yet neurophysiological mechanisms underlying anxiety severity remain poorly understood. To characterize neurophysiological alterations associated with different levels of anxiety severity in drug-naïve MDD, we used resting-state electroencephalogram (EEG) microstate analysis. Resting-state EEG was recorded from 113 MDD patients with varying anxiety levels (DDA) and 60 healthy controls (HC). Patients were stratified into low (DDLA), moderate (DDMA), and severe (DDSA) groups using the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale. K-means clustering identified seven microstate classes (A-G). Microstate B duration was reduced in all patient groups compared with HC, indicating visual network dysfunction common to depression. Microstate G-corresponding to sensorimotor and interoceptive networks-showed robust progressive alterations, with duration, occurrence, and coverage increasing from DDLA to DDMA and DDSA. Non-random transition pairs were reduced in patients compared with HC (22 pairs) but increased progressively with anxiety severity (DDLA: 10, DDMA: 16, DDSA: 18 pairs). The degree of anxiety was positively correlated with significantly enhanced transitions between microstates D, F, and G (executive control, anterior default mode network, and sensorimotor networks). Microstate G parameters and anxiety severity were found to be positively correlated in the DDA patient. Microstate G may index anxiety severity at the neurophysiological level in depressed patients with anxiety, and progressive D-F-G network disruption reflects cumulative dysregulation of large-scale brain networks associated with co-occurring anxiety. These findings may have implications for biomarker development and targeted interventions.
{"title":"EEG microstate dynamics reveal progressive sensorimotor network dysfunction across levels of anxiety severity in drug-naïve major depressive disorder.","authors":"Zhendong Zhang, Hehua Li, Yuanyuan Huang, Yuhang He, Wanting Xu, Jingping Wu, Yun Yi, Shixuan Feng, Chenyu Liu, Shisong Lin, Lida Zhang, Kai Wu, Fengchun Wu","doi":"10.1016/j.jad.2026.121373","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2026.121373","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Anxiety symptoms are highly prevalent in major depressive disorder (MDD) and significantly influence clinical outcomes, yet neurophysiological mechanisms underlying anxiety severity remain poorly understood. To characterize neurophysiological alterations associated with different levels of anxiety severity in drug-naïve MDD, we used resting-state electroencephalogram (EEG) microstate analysis. Resting-state EEG was recorded from 113 MDD patients with varying anxiety levels (DDA) and 60 healthy controls (HC). Patients were stratified into low (DDLA), moderate (DDMA), and severe (DDSA) groups using the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale. K-means clustering identified seven microstate classes (A-G). Microstate B duration was reduced in all patient groups compared with HC, indicating visual network dysfunction common to depression. Microstate G-corresponding to sensorimotor and interoceptive networks-showed robust progressive alterations, with duration, occurrence, and coverage increasing from DDLA to DDMA and DDSA. Non-random transition pairs were reduced in patients compared with HC (22 pairs) but increased progressively with anxiety severity (DDLA: 10, DDMA: 16, DDSA: 18 pairs). The degree of anxiety was positively correlated with significantly enhanced transitions between microstates D, F, and G (executive control, anterior default mode network, and sensorimotor networks). Microstate G parameters and anxiety severity were found to be positively correlated in the DDA patient. Microstate G may index anxiety severity at the neurophysiological level in depressed patients with anxiety, and progressive D-F-G network disruption reflects cumulative dysregulation of large-scale brain networks associated with co-occurring anxiety. These findings may have implications for biomarker development and targeted interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":14963,"journal":{"name":"Journal of affective disorders","volume":" ","pages":"121373"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146179955","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-10DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2026.121376
A Lok, A N Kemble, F Mol, H Hoxha, I O Bergfeld
Background: Anhedonia-a core symptom of mood disorders-reflects impairments in both reward anticipation and reward consumption. While its neurobiological underpinnings have been extensively studied in adults, considerably less is known about adolescent populations, despite critical neurodevelopmental changes during this period. This scoping review aims to map current evidence onto neurobiological correlates of anhedonia in adolescents with mood disorders.
Methods: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed and PsycInfo to identify studies investigating anhedonia in adolescents with mood disorders using neuroimaging techniques. Due to heterogeneity in study design and outcomes, findings were synthesized narratively.
Results: Twenty-one articles met the inclusion criteria, reporting on 1278 patients. The analysis revealed that anhedonia involves (1) increased frontal and decreased striatal activity during reward/incentive processing, and activation of regions of the limbic system during loss-related error processing; (2) striatal and corticolimbic activity during emotional processing; (3) reduced medial prefrontal cortex activity during cognitive processing; (4) involvement of corticostriatal and corticolimbic functional connectivity networks; (5) an inverse association between cerebral blood flow in corticolimbic and frontal regions in cerebral blood flow analysis; (6) altered alpha and theta activity and reduced cortical reactivity, and that; (7) GABA involvement in anhedonia remains inconclusive.
Conclusions: The neurobiological signatures of anhedonia in adolescents appear to involve altered activation and connectivity in reward-related circuits, particularly during anticipatory and error-processing phases. These findings underscore the need for greater methodological consistency, standardized phenotyping of anhedonia, and longitudinal studies to better understand developmental trajectories and inform early interventions.
{"title":"Neurobiological mechanisms of anhedonia in adolescents with mood disorders: A scoping review.","authors":"A Lok, A N Kemble, F Mol, H Hoxha, I O Bergfeld","doi":"10.1016/j.jad.2026.121376","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2026.121376","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Anhedonia-a core symptom of mood disorders-reflects impairments in both reward anticipation and reward consumption. While its neurobiological underpinnings have been extensively studied in adults, considerably less is known about adolescent populations, despite critical neurodevelopmental changes during this period. This scoping review aims to map current evidence onto neurobiological correlates of anhedonia in adolescents with mood disorders.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was conducted in PubMed and PsycInfo to identify studies investigating anhedonia in adolescents with mood disorders using neuroimaging techniques. Due to heterogeneity in study design and outcomes, findings were synthesized narratively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-one articles met the inclusion criteria, reporting on 1278 patients. The analysis revealed that anhedonia involves (1) increased frontal and decreased striatal activity during reward/incentive processing, and activation of regions of the limbic system during loss-related error processing; (2) striatal and corticolimbic activity during emotional processing; (3) reduced medial prefrontal cortex activity during cognitive processing; (4) involvement of corticostriatal and corticolimbic functional connectivity networks; (5) an inverse association between cerebral blood flow in corticolimbic and frontal regions in cerebral blood flow analysis; (6) altered alpha and theta activity and reduced cortical reactivity, and that; (7) GABA involvement in anhedonia remains inconclusive.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The neurobiological signatures of anhedonia in adolescents appear to involve altered activation and connectivity in reward-related circuits, particularly during anticipatory and error-processing phases. These findings underscore the need for greater methodological consistency, standardized phenotyping of anhedonia, and longitudinal studies to better understand developmental trajectories and inform early interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":14963,"journal":{"name":"Journal of affective disorders","volume":" ","pages":"121376"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146180005","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}