Pub Date : 2026-02-17DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2026.121424
Paula Lea Usemann, Friederike S David, Katharina Brosch, Frederike Stein, Adrian Wroblewski, Florian Thomas-Odenthal, Lea Teutenberg, Julia-Katharina Pfarr, Ulrika Evermann, Kira Flinkenflügel, Susanne Meinert, Katharina Thiel, Alexandra Winter, Tim Hahn, Nico Melzer, Marcella Rietschel, Stephanie H Witt, Till F M Andlauer, Hamidreza Jamalabadi, Andreas Jansen, Benjamin Straube, Markus M Nöthen, Andreas J Forstner, Igor Nenadić, Udo Dannlowski, Tilo Kircher, Nina Alexander
Although low-grade inflammatory processes have traditionally been studied in affective disorders, they are increasingly recognized as relevant across diagnostic categories. Genetic predisposition and environmental exposures such as childhood trauma (CT) may influence inflammation and shape vulnerability to psychopathology. Understanding how genetic predisposition for inflammation relates to specific symptom dimensions may clarify biological mechanisms underlying psychopathology. In N = 1790 individuals from the Marburg-Münster Affective Disorders Cohort Study (MACS), including patients with affective, anxiety, and psychotic disorders, as well as healthy controls, five transdiagnostic psychopathological syndrome factors were derived using factor analysis of clinical ratings. Polygenic scores (PGS) for circulating tumor necrosis factor TNF-α, interleukin IL-6, IL-10, and CRP were computed to indicate genetic predisposition to low-grade inflammation. Using network analyses, associations between inflammatory PGS and psychopathological syndrome factors were estimated while adjusting for age, sex, and BMI and including CT as a potential moderator. Six direct PGS-syndrome associations emerged, all with small but stable effect sizes. IL-6 PGS had the broadest connectivity, showing negative associations with increased appetite, paranoid-hallucinatory syndrome, and depression, as well as a positive association with negative syndrome. It also had the highest bridging centrality. IL-10 PGS was connected to negative and paranoid hallucinatory syndromes. These associations were largely independent of diagnosis and CT exposure. Integrating inflammatory genetic predisposition into networks of transdiagnostic symptom dimensions reveals small but consistent links between immune-related genetic risk and psychopathology, highlighting shared and distinct immunological pathways across psychiatric disorders.
尽管传统上对情感性障碍的低级别炎症过程进行了研究,但它们越来越被认为是跨诊断类别相关的。遗传易感性和环境暴露,如童年创伤(CT)可能影响炎症和塑造易受精神病理影响的脆弱性。了解炎症的遗传易感性如何与特定症状维度相关,可以阐明精神病理学的生物学机制。在marburg - m nster情感性障碍队列研究(MACS)的N = 1790名个体中,包括情感性、焦虑性和精神性障碍患者以及健康对照者,使用临床评分的因素分析得出了五个跨诊断精神病理综合征因素。计算循环肿瘤坏死因子TNF-α、白细胞介素IL-6、IL-10和CRP的多基因评分(PGS),以表明低级别炎症的遗传易感性。使用网络分析,在调整年龄、性别和BMI并包括CT作为潜在调节因素的情况下,估计炎症性PGS和精神病理综合征因素之间的关联。出现了6个直接的pgs综合征关联,所有的效应量都很小但稳定。IL-6 PGS具有最广泛的连通性,与食欲增加、偏执幻觉综合征和抑郁呈负相关,与阴性综合征呈正相关。它也具有最高的桥接中心性。IL-10 PGS与阴性和偏执型幻觉综合征有关。这些关联在很大程度上与诊断和CT暴露无关。将炎症遗传易感性整合到跨诊断症状维度的网络中,揭示了免疫相关遗传风险与精神病理之间微小但一致的联系,突出了精神疾病中共享的和独特的免疫途径。
{"title":"Genetic predisposition to inflammation and psychopathology: A transdiagnostic network analysis.","authors":"Paula Lea Usemann, Friederike S David, Katharina Brosch, Frederike Stein, Adrian Wroblewski, Florian Thomas-Odenthal, Lea Teutenberg, Julia-Katharina Pfarr, Ulrika Evermann, Kira Flinkenflügel, Susanne Meinert, Katharina Thiel, Alexandra Winter, Tim Hahn, Nico Melzer, Marcella Rietschel, Stephanie H Witt, Till F M Andlauer, Hamidreza Jamalabadi, Andreas Jansen, Benjamin Straube, Markus M Nöthen, Andreas J Forstner, Igor Nenadić, Udo Dannlowski, Tilo Kircher, Nina Alexander","doi":"10.1016/j.jad.2026.121424","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jad.2026.121424","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although low-grade inflammatory processes have traditionally been studied in affective disorders, they are increasingly recognized as relevant across diagnostic categories. Genetic predisposition and environmental exposures such as childhood trauma (CT) may influence inflammation and shape vulnerability to psychopathology. Understanding how genetic predisposition for inflammation relates to specific symptom dimensions may clarify biological mechanisms underlying psychopathology. In N = 1790 individuals from the Marburg-Münster Affective Disorders Cohort Study (MACS), including patients with affective, anxiety, and psychotic disorders, as well as healthy controls, five transdiagnostic psychopathological syndrome factors were derived using factor analysis of clinical ratings. Polygenic scores (PGS) for circulating tumor necrosis factor TNF-α, interleukin IL-6, IL-10, and CRP were computed to indicate genetic predisposition to low-grade inflammation. Using network analyses, associations between inflammatory PGS and psychopathological syndrome factors were estimated while adjusting for age, sex, and BMI and including CT as a potential moderator. Six direct PGS-syndrome associations emerged, all with small but stable effect sizes. IL-6 PGS had the broadest connectivity, showing negative associations with increased appetite, paranoid-hallucinatory syndrome, and depression, as well as a positive association with negative syndrome. It also had the highest bridging centrality. IL-10 PGS was connected to negative and paranoid hallucinatory syndromes. These associations were largely independent of diagnosis and CT exposure. Integrating inflammatory genetic predisposition into networks of transdiagnostic symptom dimensions reveals small but consistent links between immune-related genetic risk and psychopathology, highlighting shared and distinct immunological pathways across psychiatric disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":14963,"journal":{"name":"Journal of affective disorders","volume":" ","pages":"121424"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146226835","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-17DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2026.121451
Shiny Sachdeva, Victor W Li, Trisha Chakrabarty, Benicio N Frey, Stefanie Hassel, Keith Ho, Sidney H Kennedy, Roumen Milev, Daniel J Müller, Sagar V Parikh, Susan Rotzinger, Claudio N Soares, Valerie H Taylor, Rudolf Uher, Raymond W Lam
Objectives: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is associated with significant impairment in occupational functioning. The Lam Employment Absence and Productivity Scale (LEAPS) is a self-report questionnaire validated for the assessment of work productivity and absenteeism in patients with MDD. Our study objective was to establish a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the LEAPS.
Methods: Data from the Canadian Biomarker Integration Network in Depression (CAN-BIND)-1 study was used. CAN-BIND-1 involved participants with MDD treated with escitalopram for 8 weeks (n = 138). Assessments included the LEAPS, Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS), and Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self-Rated (QIDS-SR). The MCID for the LEAPS was calculated using both distribution (value equivalent to half the standard deviation for LEAPS baseline scores) and anchor-based (comparing to the SDS work item) methods.
Results: The LEAPS total score was significantly correlated (p < 0.01) with other measures including SDS work item (r = 0.598), SDS total score (r = 0.609), and QIDS-SR (r = 0.678). Using the distribution-based method, the MCID value for LEAPS total score was 3.0 and MCID for LEAPS productivity subscale score was 1.5. Using the anchor-based method, the MCID value for the LEAPS total score was shown to lie between 2.7 and 3.5 and for the LEAPS productivity subscale score between 0.9 and 1.4.
Conclusions: Establishing an MCID is important for determining clinically relevant change in the LEAPS, both for treatment studies and for individual patients in clinical care. For clinical use, the proposed MCID is 3 points for the LEAPS total score and 2 points for the LEAPS productivity subscale score.
{"title":"Lam Employment Absence and Productivity Scale (LEAPS): Analysis of the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in patients with major depressive disorder using data from the CAN-BIND-1 study.","authors":"Shiny Sachdeva, Victor W Li, Trisha Chakrabarty, Benicio N Frey, Stefanie Hassel, Keith Ho, Sidney H Kennedy, Roumen Milev, Daniel J Müller, Sagar V Parikh, Susan Rotzinger, Claudio N Soares, Valerie H Taylor, Rudolf Uher, Raymond W Lam","doi":"10.1016/j.jad.2026.121451","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jad.2026.121451","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Major depressive disorder (MDD) is associated with significant impairment in occupational functioning. The Lam Employment Absence and Productivity Scale (LEAPS) is a self-report questionnaire validated for the assessment of work productivity and absenteeism in patients with MDD. Our study objective was to establish a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the LEAPS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from the Canadian Biomarker Integration Network in Depression (CAN-BIND)-1 study was used. CAN-BIND-1 involved participants with MDD treated with escitalopram for 8 weeks (n = 138). Assessments included the LEAPS, Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS), and Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self-Rated (QIDS-SR). The MCID for the LEAPS was calculated using both distribution (value equivalent to half the standard deviation for LEAPS baseline scores) and anchor-based (comparing to the SDS work item) methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The LEAPS total score was significantly correlated (p < 0.01) with other measures including SDS work item (r = 0.598), SDS total score (r = 0.609), and QIDS-SR (r = 0.678). Using the distribution-based method, the MCID value for LEAPS total score was 3.0 and MCID for LEAPS productivity subscale score was 1.5. Using the anchor-based method, the MCID value for the LEAPS total score was shown to lie between 2.7 and 3.5 and for the LEAPS productivity subscale score between 0.9 and 1.4.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Establishing an MCID is important for determining clinically relevant change in the LEAPS, both for treatment studies and for individual patients in clinical care. For clinical use, the proposed MCID is 3 points for the LEAPS total score and 2 points for the LEAPS productivity subscale score.</p>","PeriodicalId":14963,"journal":{"name":"Journal of affective disorders","volume":" ","pages":"121451"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146226841","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-17DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2026.121306
Natalia Roberto, Michele De Prisco, Jorge Andreo-Jover, María Arqueros, Wala Ayad Ahmed, Teresa Bobes-Bascarán M, Manuel Canal-Rivero, Ana Isabel Cebrià, Benedicto Crespo-Facorro, Alejandro de la Torre, Marina Diaz-Marsá, Matilde Elices, Daniel García Martínez, Iria Grande, Luis Jiménez-Treviño, J John Mann, S Roger McIntyre, Vincenzo Oliva, Ángela Palao, Diego J Palao, Iván Pérez-Diez, Miguel Ruiz-Vegüilla, Pilar Alejandra Sáiz, Iñaki Zorrilla, Víctor Pérez-Solà
The best predictor of a suicide attempt is a previous attempt, apart from psychiatric diagnoses also associated. Some studies found other indicators of great risk for suicide reattempts. Machine Learning algorithms offer the potential for systematic detection of features that carry greater risk for an event. This study sought to develop a classification algorithm distinguishing between Single Suicide Attempters (SSA) and Multiple Suicide Attempters (MSA) in a Spanish multicentre national cohort to explore prediction of subsequent attempts in suicidal patients. Two models including the same sociodemographic and clinical variables grouped in more specific (Model I) or broad (Model II) categories were developed to explore risk factors for suicide reattempts. A Least Absolute Shrinkage and Regression Operator logistic regression with a 10-fold cross-validation was adopted. 1443 adult patients from the SURVIVE cohort were included (582 SSA and 861 MSA). Both Model I (AUC = 0.696; BAC = 0.644) and Model II (AUC = 0.678; BAC = 0.621) outperformed naïve majority-class classification for SSA and MSA. Bipolar disorder type II, binge-eating disorder, and schizophrenia variables weighted heavier on Model I for suicide reattempt-related; while eating disorder diagnosis, Africa as birthplace, affective disorder diagnosis, being employed, schizophrenia-spectrum disorder and substance use disorder diagnoses were the most important suicide reattempt-related of Model II. Affective disorders, eating disorders and schizophrenia-spectrum disorders emerged as the most important variables in predicting reattempts. Both models showed similar sensitivity and specificity when discriminating between SSA and MSA. Identifying specific risk factors for reattempts could have a significant impact on tailoring prevention strategies and interventions.
{"title":"Prediction models for suicide reattempts by lasso regression through machine learning models: Single versus multiple suicide attempters.","authors":"Natalia Roberto, Michele De Prisco, Jorge Andreo-Jover, María Arqueros, Wala Ayad Ahmed, Teresa Bobes-Bascarán M, Manuel Canal-Rivero, Ana Isabel Cebrià, Benedicto Crespo-Facorro, Alejandro de la Torre, Marina Diaz-Marsá, Matilde Elices, Daniel García Martínez, Iria Grande, Luis Jiménez-Treviño, J John Mann, S Roger McIntyre, Vincenzo Oliva, Ángela Palao, Diego J Palao, Iván Pérez-Diez, Miguel Ruiz-Vegüilla, Pilar Alejandra Sáiz, Iñaki Zorrilla, Víctor Pérez-Solà","doi":"10.1016/j.jad.2026.121306","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jad.2026.121306","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The best predictor of a suicide attempt is a previous attempt, apart from psychiatric diagnoses also associated. Some studies found other indicators of great risk for suicide reattempts. Machine Learning algorithms offer the potential for systematic detection of features that carry greater risk for an event. This study sought to develop a classification algorithm distinguishing between Single Suicide Attempters (SSA) and Multiple Suicide Attempters (MSA) in a Spanish multicentre national cohort to explore prediction of subsequent attempts in suicidal patients. Two models including the same sociodemographic and clinical variables grouped in more specific (Model I) or broad (Model II) categories were developed to explore risk factors for suicide reattempts. A Least Absolute Shrinkage and Regression Operator logistic regression with a 10-fold cross-validation was adopted. 1443 adult patients from the SURVIVE cohort were included (582 SSA and 861 MSA). Both Model I (AUC = 0.696; BAC = 0.644) and Model II (AUC = 0.678; BAC = 0.621) outperformed naïve majority-class classification for SSA and MSA. Bipolar disorder type II, binge-eating disorder, and schizophrenia variables weighted heavier on Model I for suicide reattempt-related; while eating disorder diagnosis, Africa as birthplace, affective disorder diagnosis, being employed, schizophrenia-spectrum disorder and substance use disorder diagnoses were the most important suicide reattempt-related of Model II. Affective disorders, eating disorders and schizophrenia-spectrum disorders emerged as the most important variables in predicting reattempts. Both models showed similar sensitivity and specificity when discriminating between SSA and MSA. Identifying specific risk factors for reattempts could have a significant impact on tailoring prevention strategies and interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":14963,"journal":{"name":"Journal of affective disorders","volume":" ","pages":"121306"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146213092","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-16DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2026.121445
Lauren Burke, Julie Christiansen, Mathias Lasgaard, Ola Demkowicz, Lily Verity, Jennifer Y F Lau, Pamela Qualter
Loneliness in youth is linked to poor mental and physical health, yet the effectiveness of interventions remains unclear. Given its distinct developmental presentation, this meta-analysis synthesises interventions targeting loneliness in individuals aged 4-18 to inform age-appropriate strategies. It examines the effects of interventions on loneliness and includes a narrative synthesis of intervention and sample characteristics. We conducted a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of quantitative studies up to March 2024, focusing on interventions where loneliness was the primary target in school-aged youth. Nineteen studies were included in the SLR, of which 18 were included in the meta-analysis (6 RCTs, 6 multi-cohort, and 6 single-cohort studies). RCTs showed a small, non-significant reduction in loneliness (Hedges' g = -0.20, 95% CI [-0.42, 0.02], p = .07), with social and emotional skills training interventions being most effective. Multi-cohort studies showed a negligible effect (Hedges' g = -0.01, 95% CI [-0.08, 0.07], p = .84). Single-cohort studies indicated a moderate, non-significant effect (Hedges' g = -0.55, 95% CI [-1.29, 0.18], p = .14). Interventions targeting loneliness show promise in reducing loneliness, particularly when they incorporate social and emotional learning. Future research should integrate qualitative approaches and consider loneliness within broader mental health and well-being frameworks to support the development of more comprehensive, youth-centred interventions.
青少年的孤独感与心理和身体健康状况不佳有关,但干预措施的有效性尚不清楚。鉴于其独特的发展表现,本荟萃分析综合了针对4-18岁个体孤独的干预措施,以提供适合年龄的策略。它检查了干预对孤独的影响,包括干预和样本特征的叙事综合。我们对截至2024年3月的定量研究进行了系统的文献综述和荟萃分析,重点关注孤独感是学龄青少年主要目标的干预措施。SLR纳入了19项研究,其中18项纳入了meta分析(6项随机对照试验,6项多队列研究,6项单队列研究)。随机对照试验显示孤独感有微小的、不显著的降低(Hedges' g = -0.20,95% CI [-0.42, 0.02], p = )。07),社会和情感技能培训干预是最有效的。多队列研究显示,影响可以忽略不计(Hedges的g = -0.01,95% CI [-0.08, 0.07], p = .84)。单队列研究显示中度、不显著的影响(Hedges的g = -0.55,95% CI [-1.29, 0.18], p = .14)。针对孤独感的干预措施有望减少孤独感,特别是当它们纳入社交和情感学习时。未来的研究应结合定性方法,并在更广泛的心理健康和福祉框架内考虑孤独,以支持发展更全面、以青年为中心的干预措施。
{"title":"Interventions to reduce loneliness in children and adolescents (4-18 years): A systematic review and meta-analysis with narrative synthesis of study-level characteristics.","authors":"Lauren Burke, Julie Christiansen, Mathias Lasgaard, Ola Demkowicz, Lily Verity, Jennifer Y F Lau, Pamela Qualter","doi":"10.1016/j.jad.2026.121445","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jad.2026.121445","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Loneliness in youth is linked to poor mental and physical health, yet the effectiveness of interventions remains unclear. Given its distinct developmental presentation, this meta-analysis synthesises interventions targeting loneliness in individuals aged 4-18 to inform age-appropriate strategies. It examines the effects of interventions on loneliness and includes a narrative synthesis of intervention and sample characteristics. We conducted a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of quantitative studies up to March 2024, focusing on interventions where loneliness was the primary target in school-aged youth. Nineteen studies were included in the SLR, of which 18 were included in the meta-analysis (6 RCTs, 6 multi-cohort, and 6 single-cohort studies). RCTs showed a small, non-significant reduction in loneliness (Hedges' g = -0.20, 95% CI [-0.42, 0.02], p = .07), with social and emotional skills training interventions being most effective. Multi-cohort studies showed a negligible effect (Hedges' g = -0.01, 95% CI [-0.08, 0.07], p = .84). Single-cohort studies indicated a moderate, non-significant effect (Hedges' g = -0.55, 95% CI [-1.29, 0.18], p = .14). Interventions targeting loneliness show promise in reducing loneliness, particularly when they incorporate social and emotional learning. Future research should integrate qualitative approaches and consider loneliness within broader mental health and well-being frameworks to support the development of more comprehensive, youth-centred interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":14963,"journal":{"name":"Journal of affective disorders","volume":" ","pages":"121445"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146219781","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-16DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2026.121419
Thore Petersen, Julia Martini, Michael Bauer, Andreas Bechdolf, Felix Bermpohl, Christina Berndt, Kyra L Bröckel-Bundt, Tjorven Sperling, Christoph U Correll, Udo Dannlowski, Irina Falkenberg, Andreas J Fallgatter, Paolo Fusar-Poli, Andreas Jansen, Georg Juckel, Tilo Kircher, Sarah Kittel-Schneider, Seza Krüger-Özgürdal, Martin Lambert, Karolina Leopold, Birgit Maicher, Silke Matura, Eva Mennigen, Andreas Reif, Philipp Ritter, Cathrin Sauer, Thomas Stamm, Andrea Pfennig
Background: Depressive episodes are associated with a higher risk for the onset of bipolar disorder (BD). This study investigates the contribution of specific depressive symptoms using a multi-method approach in persons at-risk for bipolar disorders.
Methods: In the Early-BipoLife study, N = 1083 participants at risk for BD were examined over two years (baseline, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months). Out of 1083 participants, N = 57 (5.3%) transitioned to BD and/or were prescribed with a mood stabilizing medication (lithium, lamotrigine, valproic acid, carbamazepine, quetiapine). At baseline, N = 880 participants met the diagnostic criteria for lifetime major depression (lifetime MD) (SCID). Depressive symptoms were recorded using diagnostic interviews (EPIbipolar, SCID), a clinician rating (ICD-C) and a self-rating (QIDS-SR16). Binary logistic regressions were calculated to assess the prospective association between depressive symptoms and transition/prescription of a mood stabilizing medication.
Results: Compared to 'no lifetime MD', 'lifetime MD' were at higher risk for transition and/or prescription of a mood stabilizing medication (OR = 2.87, 95%CI: 1.03-8.04). A higher QIDS-SR16 symptom load was associated with transition and/or prescription of a mood stabilizing medication (OR = 1.07, 95%CI: 1.01-1.13). Consistently and across methods, it was shown that suicidality at baseline predicted transition to BD and/or prescription of a mood stabilizing medication. Further baseline symptoms assessed by the clinicians (IDS-C), such as decreased or increased appetite and quality of mood were also predictive for this outcome.
Conclusion: Depressive symptom load and suicidality were robust predictors for BD. Clinician judgment can provide important information for early detection of BD.
{"title":"Contribution of depressive symptom load on prediction of transition to bipolar disorders: Results from the prospective-longitudinal multi-method Early-BipoLife study.","authors":"Thore Petersen, Julia Martini, Michael Bauer, Andreas Bechdolf, Felix Bermpohl, Christina Berndt, Kyra L Bröckel-Bundt, Tjorven Sperling, Christoph U Correll, Udo Dannlowski, Irina Falkenberg, Andreas J Fallgatter, Paolo Fusar-Poli, Andreas Jansen, Georg Juckel, Tilo Kircher, Sarah Kittel-Schneider, Seza Krüger-Özgürdal, Martin Lambert, Karolina Leopold, Birgit Maicher, Silke Matura, Eva Mennigen, Andreas Reif, Philipp Ritter, Cathrin Sauer, Thomas Stamm, Andrea Pfennig","doi":"10.1016/j.jad.2026.121419","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jad.2026.121419","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Depressive episodes are associated with a higher risk for the onset of bipolar disorder (BD). This study investigates the contribution of specific depressive symptoms using a multi-method approach in persons at-risk for bipolar disorders.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In the Early-BipoLife study, N = 1083 participants at risk for BD were examined over two years (baseline, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months). Out of 1083 participants, N = 57 (5.3%) transitioned to BD and/or were prescribed with a mood stabilizing medication (lithium, lamotrigine, valproic acid, carbamazepine, quetiapine). At baseline, N = 880 participants met the diagnostic criteria for lifetime major depression (lifetime MD) (SCID). Depressive symptoms were recorded using diagnostic interviews (EPIbipolar, SCID), a clinician rating (ICD-C) and a self-rating (QIDS-SR16). Binary logistic regressions were calculated to assess the prospective association between depressive symptoms and transition/prescription of a mood stabilizing medication.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to 'no lifetime MD', 'lifetime MD' were at higher risk for transition and/or prescription of a mood stabilizing medication (OR = 2.87, 95%CI: 1.03-8.04). A higher QIDS-SR16 symptom load was associated with transition and/or prescription of a mood stabilizing medication (OR = 1.07, 95%CI: 1.01-1.13). Consistently and across methods, it was shown that suicidality at baseline predicted transition to BD and/or prescription of a mood stabilizing medication. Further baseline symptoms assessed by the clinicians (IDS-C), such as decreased or increased appetite and quality of mood were also predictive for this outcome.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Depressive symptom load and suicidality were robust predictors for BD. Clinician judgment can provide important information for early detection of BD.</p>","PeriodicalId":14963,"journal":{"name":"Journal of affective disorders","volume":" ","pages":"121419"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146219710","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-16DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2026.121418
Tony Xing Tan
Objectives: Guided by the diathesis-stress model of mental disorders, the current study tested how two forms of diathesis (ADHD and Medical Health Risk) and two forms of external stressors (social health risk and relational health risk) predicted depression diagnosis in American children and adolescents.
Method: Secondary data for 65,652 children and adolescents (Weighted N = 48,352,311) aged 6-17 were extracted from the combined 2022-2023 National Survey of Children's Health (NSCH). In addition to ADHD and depression diagnosis, the 2022-2023 NSCH constructed the Whole Child Risk Index (WCRI), which includes three domains: (1) Medical Health Risk (MHR) index, which captures the presence of chronic physical health conditions and functional impairment; (2) Social Health Risk (SHR) index, which captures the exposure to family social and economic disadvantages, and (3) Relational Health Risk (RHR) index, which captures the exposure to adverse childhood experiences and relationship challenges with parents. Each index falls on a 0-4-point scale from no risk to four risks.
Results: 12.4% had an ADHD diagnosis, 5.4% had a depression diagnosis, 28% had MHR, 27% had SHR, and 40% had RHR. The logistic regression model showed that ADHD, MHR, SHR, RHR and four diathesis-stress interactions increased the likelihood of depression diagnosis with outstanding model fit and prediction accuracy (McFadden's R-Squared = 0.31; AUC = 0.89). Noticeably, MHR (McFadden's R-Squared = 0.25; AUC = 0.86) outperformed ADHD, SHR and RHR in model fit and prediction accuracy.
Conclusion: The findings support the diathesis-stress interaction hypothesis, but the practical significance of the interactions is negligible.
Implication: Because of its substantial role in depression diagnosis, integrating mental health care into existing medical care can enhance child and adolescent healthcare practice.
{"title":"The role of ADHD, medical, social, and relational health risk in depression: Evidence from a nationally representative sample of U.S. children and adolescents.","authors":"Tony Xing Tan","doi":"10.1016/j.jad.2026.121418","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jad.2026.121418","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Guided by the diathesis-stress model of mental disorders, the current study tested how two forms of diathesis (ADHD and Medical Health Risk) and two forms of external stressors (social health risk and relational health risk) predicted depression diagnosis in American children and adolescents.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Secondary data for 65,652 children and adolescents (Weighted N = 48,352,311) aged 6-17 were extracted from the combined 2022-2023 National Survey of Children's Health (NSCH). In addition to ADHD and depression diagnosis, the 2022-2023 NSCH constructed the Whole Child Risk Index (WCRI), which includes three domains: (1) Medical Health Risk (MHR) index, which captures the presence of chronic physical health conditions and functional impairment; (2) Social Health Risk (SHR) index, which captures the exposure to family social and economic disadvantages, and (3) Relational Health Risk (RHR) index, which captures the exposure to adverse childhood experiences and relationship challenges with parents. Each index falls on a 0-4-point scale from no risk to four risks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>12.4% had an ADHD diagnosis, 5.4% had a depression diagnosis, 28% had MHR, 27% had SHR, and 40% had RHR. The logistic regression model showed that ADHD, MHR, SHR, RHR and four diathesis-stress interactions increased the likelihood of depression diagnosis with outstanding model fit and prediction accuracy (McFadden's R-Squared = 0.31; AUC = 0.89). Noticeably, MHR (McFadden's R-Squared = 0.25; AUC = 0.86) outperformed ADHD, SHR and RHR in model fit and prediction accuracy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings support the diathesis-stress interaction hypothesis, but the practical significance of the interactions is negligible.</p><p><strong>Implication: </strong>Because of its substantial role in depression diagnosis, integrating mental health care into existing medical care can enhance child and adolescent healthcare practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":14963,"journal":{"name":"Journal of affective disorders","volume":" ","pages":"121418"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146219800","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-16DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2026.121417
Hyejin Tae, Jeong-Ho Chae
Background: Irregular main-meal consumption frequency may disrupt metabolic and behavioral regulation, factors increasingly linked to affective disorders. However, evidence from nationally representative populations is limited.
Methods: We analyzed data from 21,568 adults in the 2014-2022 Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Depressive symptoms were assessed with the PHQ-9. Multivariable logistic regression and restricted cubic spline analyses were conducted, adjusting for sociodemographic, lifestyle, and nutritional factors. Moderation and subgroup analyses examined dietary diversity, breakfast skipping, and lifestyle variables.
Results: Irregular main-meal consumption frequency was associated with higher odds of depressive symptoms (adjusted OR for highest vs. lowest irregularity = 1.55, 95% CI 1.42-1.69, p < 0.001). The association was strongest in those with the lowest dietary diversity, while greater variety buffered adverse effects. Frequent breakfast skipping heightened susceptibility. No higher-order interactions were observed. Subgroup analyses showed stronger associations in men, smokers, and late-night eaters, though these require cautious interpretation.
Limitations: Cross-sectional design, self-reported diet, and unmeasured confounders (stress, medication, sleep) may limit causal inference.
Conclusions: Irregular main-meal consumption frequency was associated with depressive symptoms, moderated by dietary diversity and breakfast habits, highlighting meal pattern regularity as a modifiable nutritional target for prevention.
背景:不规律的主餐消费频率可能会破坏代谢和行为调节,这些因素与情感性障碍的关系越来越密切。然而,来自全国代表性人群的证据是有限的。方法:我们分析了2014-2022年韩国国家健康与营养调查中21568名成年人的数据。用PHQ-9量表评估抑郁症状。进行了多变量logistic回归和限制三次样条分析,调整了社会人口、生活方式和营养因素。适度和亚组分析检查了饮食多样性、不吃早餐和生活方式变量。结果:不规律的主餐消费频率与抑郁症状的高发生率相关(最高与最低不规律的校正OR = 1.55,95% CI 1.42-1.69, p )局限性:横断面设计、自我报告的饮食和未测量的混杂因素(压力、药物、睡眠)可能限制因果推断。结论:不规律的主餐消费频率与抑郁症状相关,并受饮食多样性和早餐习惯的调节,强调膳食模式规律是预防的可调整营养目标。
{"title":"Irregular meal frequency and depressive symptoms: Moderating roles of dietary diversity and breakfast skipping.","authors":"Hyejin Tae, Jeong-Ho Chae","doi":"10.1016/j.jad.2026.121417","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2026.121417","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Irregular main-meal consumption frequency may disrupt metabolic and behavioral regulation, factors increasingly linked to affective disorders. However, evidence from nationally representative populations is limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed data from 21,568 adults in the 2014-2022 Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Depressive symptoms were assessed with the PHQ-9. Multivariable logistic regression and restricted cubic spline analyses were conducted, adjusting for sociodemographic, lifestyle, and nutritional factors. Moderation and subgroup analyses examined dietary diversity, breakfast skipping, and lifestyle variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Irregular main-meal consumption frequency was associated with higher odds of depressive symptoms (adjusted OR for highest vs. lowest irregularity = 1.55, 95% CI 1.42-1.69, p < 0.001). The association was strongest in those with the lowest dietary diversity, while greater variety buffered adverse effects. Frequent breakfast skipping heightened susceptibility. No higher-order interactions were observed. Subgroup analyses showed stronger associations in men, smokers, and late-night eaters, though these require cautious interpretation.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Cross-sectional design, self-reported diet, and unmeasured confounders (stress, medication, sleep) may limit causal inference.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Irregular main-meal consumption frequency was associated with depressive symptoms, moderated by dietary diversity and breakfast habits, highlighting meal pattern regularity as a modifiable nutritional target for prevention.</p>","PeriodicalId":14963,"journal":{"name":"Journal of affective disorders","volume":" ","pages":"121417"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146219790","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Sleep disturbances are common in older adults and increase the risk of depression. Although several longitudinal studies have examined this relationship, few have focused on subjective sleep quality and its changes in large ageing cohorts.
Methods: A total of 11,050 non-depressed participants from wave 4 (2008-2009) of the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing were followed. Sleep quality was self-reported and categorized as good, intermediate, or poor. Depressive symptoms was assessed using the CESD8 scale. Cox proportional hazards models estimated the hazard ratios (HRs) for depressive symptoms, adjusting for demographic, health, and lifestyle factors.
Results: Among 8425 eligible participants, intermediate sleep quality was associated with a 45% lower risk of depressive symptoms (HR = 0.55, 95% CI: 0.43-0.69), and good quality with a 69% lower risk (HR = 0.31, 95% CI: 0.24-0.40). These associations remained significant in sensitivity analyses limited to individuals with normal sleep duration. Stronger protective effects were observed in those aged 60-80 years. Moreover, participants who maintained or improved their sleep quality over time had significantly lower depressive symptoms risks than those whose sleep worsened (HR = 0.64 and HR = 0.58).
Conclusion: Better self-reported sleep quality was independently associated with a lower risk of depressive symptoms in older adults. While causality cannot be inferred, these findings highlight sleep quality as a potentially modifiable target for depression prevention in ageing populations.
{"title":"Higher sleep quality predicts lower risk of depressive symptoms: A prospective analysis from the English longitudinal study of ageing.","authors":"Mixue Guo, Meixuan Guo, Huqiang Dong, Hongli Wan, Mengyuan Cai, Zongren Zhao, Luming Wei, Huiying Guo","doi":"10.1016/j.jad.2026.121420","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jad.2026.121420","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sleep disturbances are common in older adults and increase the risk of depression. Although several longitudinal studies have examined this relationship, few have focused on subjective sleep quality and its changes in large ageing cohorts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 11,050 non-depressed participants from wave 4 (2008-2009) of the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing were followed. Sleep quality was self-reported and categorized as good, intermediate, or poor. Depressive symptoms was assessed using the CESD8 scale. Cox proportional hazards models estimated the hazard ratios (HRs) for depressive symptoms, adjusting for demographic, health, and lifestyle factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 8425 eligible participants, intermediate sleep quality was associated with a 45% lower risk of depressive symptoms (HR = 0.55, 95% CI: 0.43-0.69), and good quality with a 69% lower risk (HR = 0.31, 95% CI: 0.24-0.40). These associations remained significant in sensitivity analyses limited to individuals with normal sleep duration. Stronger protective effects were observed in those aged 60-80 years. Moreover, participants who maintained or improved their sleep quality over time had significantly lower depressive symptoms risks than those whose sleep worsened (HR = 0.64 and HR = 0.58).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Better self-reported sleep quality was independently associated with a lower risk of depressive symptoms in older adults. While causality cannot be inferred, these findings highlight sleep quality as a potentially modifiable target for depression prevention in ageing populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":14963,"journal":{"name":"Journal of affective disorders","volume":" ","pages":"121420"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146219740","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-16DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2026.121450
Peixuan Li, Shuaidan Chang, Shuping Tan, Yiqing Xing, Ziyi Wang, Tao Zhou, Chunxue Yang
Background: Synergistic health risks may arise from co-exposure to polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) and metals, yet evidence on their joint associations with depression in adults is limited.
Objectives: We examined individual and joint effects of PBDEs and metals on depression risk in adults.
Methods: Data were drawn from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES, 2005-2016), and 5872 adults were included in the analysis. Associations between individual PBDEs, five metals (cadmium, lead, mercury, calcium, and iron), and depression were assessed using multivariable logistic regression and Restricted Cubic Splines (RCS). Mixture effects were assessed using Weighted Quantile Sum (WQS) regression and Bayesian Kernel Machine Regression (BKMR).
Results: Higher cadmium exposure was linked to increased depression risk (adjusted odds ratio [adj. OR] = 2.55, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.84-3.54), whereas mercury was inversely associated (adj. OR = 0.60, 95% CI: 0.45-0.79). Most PBDE congeners showed no linear associations, though BDE28 exhibited an inverted U-shaped dose-response. The PBDE mixture alone was not associated with depression risk. In contrast, the joint PBDE-metal mixture was linked to significantly increased depression risk in both WQS and BKMR models, with BDE209, cadmium, and calcium as predominant contributors. In addition, stronger associations were observed among women, non-Hispanic Whites, and individuals with lower body mass index (BMI).
Conclusions: Co-exposure to PBDEs and metals was correlated with higher depression risk in U.S. adults, with susceptible subgroups identified by gender, race, and BMI. These findings underscore the importance of considering joint pollutant effects on mental health and prevention strategies.
{"title":"Joint effects of exposure to polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) and multiple metals on the risk of depression in adults.","authors":"Peixuan Li, Shuaidan Chang, Shuping Tan, Yiqing Xing, Ziyi Wang, Tao Zhou, Chunxue Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.jad.2026.121450","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jad.2026.121450","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Synergistic health risks may arise from co-exposure to polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) and metals, yet evidence on their joint associations with depression in adults is limited.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We examined individual and joint effects of PBDEs and metals on depression risk in adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were drawn from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES, 2005-2016), and 5872 adults were included in the analysis. Associations between individual PBDEs, five metals (cadmium, lead, mercury, calcium, and iron), and depression were assessed using multivariable logistic regression and Restricted Cubic Splines (RCS). Mixture effects were assessed using Weighted Quantile Sum (WQS) regression and Bayesian Kernel Machine Regression (BKMR).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Higher cadmium exposure was linked to increased depression risk (adjusted odds ratio [adj. OR] = 2.55, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.84-3.54), whereas mercury was inversely associated (adj. OR = 0.60, 95% CI: 0.45-0.79). Most PBDE congeners showed no linear associations, though BDE28 exhibited an inverted U-shaped dose-response. The PBDE mixture alone was not associated with depression risk. In contrast, the joint PBDE-metal mixture was linked to significantly increased depression risk in both WQS and BKMR models, with BDE209, cadmium, and calcium as predominant contributors. In addition, stronger associations were observed among women, non-Hispanic Whites, and individuals with lower body mass index (BMI).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Co-exposure to PBDEs and metals was correlated with higher depression risk in U.S. adults, with susceptible subgroups identified by gender, race, and BMI. These findings underscore the importance of considering joint pollutant effects on mental health and prevention strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":14963,"journal":{"name":"Journal of affective disorders","volume":" ","pages":"121450"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146219828","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-16DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2026.121423
Marc J Weintraub, Jessica K Jeffrey, Megan C Ichinose, R Lindsey Bergman, Benjamin Shapiro, Gregory Barnett, Hewa Artin, Marc Lynn, Anabel Salimian, Shelby Grody, Rahul Ramesh, Lauren Eales, Charles S Grob, David J Miklowitz
Background: Psilocybin-assisted therapy has emerged as a promising treatment for major depressive disorder, but little attention has been paid to the psychotherapy that adjoins psilocybin. Providing an adjunctive psychotherapy that is manualized and evidence-based may make psilocybin treatment more acceptable, effective, and disseminable. We examined the acceptability, feasibility, and clinical outcomes of psilocybin paired with cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for major depressive disorder.
Methods: Participants were adults with major depressive disorder who presented with at least moderately severe depressive symptoms. All participants underwent psilocybin-assisted CBT (PA-CBT), which consisted of two psilocybin doses (10 mg and 25 mg separated by one month) interspersed with 12 psychotherapy sessions over four months. Participants' depressive symptoms, psychosocial functioning, and cognitive-affective responses were collected at the study's baseline, at the completion of PA-CBT, and three months post-treatment.
Results: Sixteen participants were enrolled, and all were retained through the 7-month study. PA-CBT was rated as highly acceptable by participants and study clinicians, with no serious adverse events reported. Based on independent assessments, 13 of 16 participants showed at least moderate (≥ 25%) improvement in depressive symptoms by the end of treatment, and 9 had fully remitted. Pre-to-post treatment improvements in depressive symptoms and psychosocial functioning were sustained at the 3-month follow-up (Hedges' gs = 1.9-2.7). Changes in depressive severity during the treatment were associated with improvements in emotion regulation and positive and negative cognitive schemas.
Conclusions: CBT appears to be a feasible, well-accepted, and beneficial adjunct to psilocybin treatment. Future randomized trials are needed to compare the efficacy of PA-CBT with other psilocybin-assisted therapy modalities.
背景:裸盖菇素与不同程度的心理治疗已成为一种有希望的治疗重度抑郁症的方法。很少有人关注与裸盖菇素相关的心理治疗。提供辅助心理治疗是一种手动的、基于证据的治疗,可能使裸盖菇素治疗更容易被接受和有效。我们研究了裸盖菇素与认知行为疗法(CBT)联合治疗重度抑郁症的可接受性、可行性和临床结果。方法:参与者是中度或重度抑郁症状的成年人,他们参加了裸盖菇素辅助CBT (PA-CBT)。治疗包括两个裸盖菇素剂量(10 mg和25 mg,间隔一个月),并在四个月内进行12次心理治疗。在研究基线、PA-CBT完成时和治疗后3个月收集参与者的抑郁症状、社会心理功能和认知情感反应。结果:16名参与者在7个月的研究中被保留下来。PA-CBT被参与者和临床医生评为高度可接受的,没有严重的不良事件报告。根据独立评估,16名患者中有13名在3 个月后表现出至少中度(≥25%)的改善,9名完全缓解。治疗前后抑郁症状和心理社会功能的改善在3个月的随访中持续(Hedges' s = 1.9-2.7)。治疗期间抑郁严重程度的变化与情绪调节和积极和消极认知的改善有关。结论:CBT似乎是一种可行的,被广泛接受的,有益的辅助裸盖菇素治疗。未来的随机试验需要比较PA-CBT与裸盖菇素辅助治疗的疗效,后者包含更少的心理治疗。
{"title":"Psilocybin-assisted cognitive behavioral therapy for major depressive disorder: A pilot trial.","authors":"Marc J Weintraub, Jessica K Jeffrey, Megan C Ichinose, R Lindsey Bergman, Benjamin Shapiro, Gregory Barnett, Hewa Artin, Marc Lynn, Anabel Salimian, Shelby Grody, Rahul Ramesh, Lauren Eales, Charles S Grob, David J Miklowitz","doi":"10.1016/j.jad.2026.121423","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jad.2026.121423","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Psilocybin-assisted therapy has emerged as a promising treatment for major depressive disorder, but little attention has been paid to the psychotherapy that adjoins psilocybin. Providing an adjunctive psychotherapy that is manualized and evidence-based may make psilocybin treatment more acceptable, effective, and disseminable. We examined the acceptability, feasibility, and clinical outcomes of psilocybin paired with cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for major depressive disorder.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were adults with major depressive disorder who presented with at least moderately severe depressive symptoms. All participants underwent psilocybin-assisted CBT (PA-CBT), which consisted of two psilocybin doses (10 mg and 25 mg separated by one month) interspersed with 12 psychotherapy sessions over four months. Participants' depressive symptoms, psychosocial functioning, and cognitive-affective responses were collected at the study's baseline, at the completion of PA-CBT, and three months post-treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixteen participants were enrolled, and all were retained through the 7-month study. PA-CBT was rated as highly acceptable by participants and study clinicians, with no serious adverse events reported. Based on independent assessments, 13 of 16 participants showed at least moderate (≥ 25%) improvement in depressive symptoms by the end of treatment, and 9 had fully remitted. Pre-to-post treatment improvements in depressive symptoms and psychosocial functioning were sustained at the 3-month follow-up (Hedges' gs = 1.9-2.7). Changes in depressive severity during the treatment were associated with improvements in emotion regulation and positive and negative cognitive schemas.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CBT appears to be a feasible, well-accepted, and beneficial adjunct to psilocybin treatment. Future randomized trials are needed to compare the efficacy of PA-CBT with other psilocybin-assisted therapy modalities.</p>","PeriodicalId":14963,"journal":{"name":"Journal of affective disorders","volume":" ","pages":"121423"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146219826","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}