首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Applied Ecology最新文献

英文 中文
Reduced count size can provide a robust and more efficient diatom assessment of environmental conditions 减少计数量可对环境条件进行更可靠、更有效的硅藻评估
IF 5 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Pub Date : 2024-07-04 DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.14715
Luisa Riato, John L. Stoddard, Alan T. Herlihy, Karen A. Blocksom

淡水评估中常规使用的生物评估指数是通过通常耗时较长的计数方法计算得出的。对于主要基于耗时的活瓣计数的硅藻评估,尽管需要进行具有成本效益的生物评估和生物监测,但人们很少关注如何优化当前的计数方法。我们以计数大小是否足够为重点,检查了来自美国 3000 条河流和溪流的硅藻样本,以评估减少 600 个硅藻瓣膜的标准计数大小对最近发布的、基于属级特征的多计量硅藻指数(MMIs)及其组成指标的影响。硅藻数据由美国环境保护署的国家河流和溪流评估(NRSA)收集。基于 NRSA 数据设计的 MMIs 用于评估美国东部、平原和西部三大生态区的河流和溪流生态状况。我们发现,减少标准的 600 个阀门计数会带来成分指标值的变化,尤其是分类群百分比指标,但这种变化对实际 MMI 的性能影响不大。平原和东部生态区域 90% 以上的子样本以及西部生态区域 80% 以上的子样本,无论采用 600 个还是 100 个计数,都被归入同一条件类别。此外,使用 100 个瓣膜和 600 个瓣膜时,各分量指标和 MMI 区分受干扰最少和最严重地点的能力仍然相同。综合与应用。一般认为,计算大量硅藻瓣膜可获得反应更灵敏、更稳健的指数,与此相反,我们的研究表明,计算相当少的硅藻瓣膜仍可获得良好的指数性能。较少的计数总数不仅能减少分析工作量,还能减少质量保证/质量控制工作量。对于大范围的生物评估计划来说,减少计数数量可以节省大量资源,从而有可能对更多地点进行评估。我们采用子取样方法来确定最佳计数大小,是一种既省时又经济的样本处理有效方法,可用于任何生物群体。
{"title":"Reduced count size can provide a robust and more efficient diatom assessment of environmental conditions","authors":"Luisa Riato,&nbsp;John L. Stoddard,&nbsp;Alan T. Herlihy,&nbsp;Karen A. Blocksom","doi":"10.1111/1365-2664.14715","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1365-2664.14715","url":null,"abstract":"<p>\u0000 \u0000 </p>","PeriodicalId":15016,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Ecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141550575","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Influence of agricultural intensification on pollinator pesticide exposure, food acquisition and diversity 农业集约化对授粉者接触农药、获取食物和多样性的影响
IF 5 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Pub Date : 2024-07-03 DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.14701
Xiaoyu Shi, Changsheng Ma, Joop de Kraker, Shanxing Gong, Jenny A. Hodgson, Shudong Luo, Jozef J. M. van der Steen, Haijun Xiao, Fang Wang, Xiaowei Tie, Zheng Chen, Yi Zou

传粉昆虫对于维持可持续的作物生产至关重要,而传粉昆虫的减少却引起了广泛关注。农业集约化是昆虫授粉者减少的主要原因之一。农业集约化通常会导致非作物半自然栖息地减少,授粉昆虫接触农药的机会增加。然而,农业集约化、杀虫剂暴露增加、传粉昆虫食物来源减少和传粉昆虫多样性之间的因果联系仍未得到充分探索。我们评估了华南地区水稻比例从 11% 到 85% 的景观梯度上的传粉昆虫多样性。我们将蜜蜂(Apis mellifera)和石蜂(Osmia excavata)置于这些景观中,并调查了蜜蜂觅食者和花粉以及石蜂花粉和筑巢材料中的农药暴露情况。我们还评估了泥瓦匠蜂获取食物的情况。我们发现,在稻田比例较高的地区,蜜蜂觅食者和蜜蜂花粉样本中的农药检测频率较高。石匠蜂的食物获取与半自然栖息地的比例之间存在很强的正相关关系,而除了半自然栖息地的影响外,没有发现农药暴露对传粉昆虫多样性的显著影响。综述与应用:我们的研究结果表明,由于农业集约化,授粉昆虫群落接触农药的风险可能增加,而对授粉昆虫多样性的负面影响主要来自栖息地的丧失和/或食物来源的减少。这项研究强调了保护半自然栖息地以减轻授粉者多样性下降原因的重要性。我们还建议开展长期、多年的研究,以进一步了解农业景观中传粉昆虫丧失背后的机制。
{"title":"Influence of agricultural intensification on pollinator pesticide exposure, food acquisition and diversity","authors":"Xiaoyu Shi,&nbsp;Changsheng Ma,&nbsp;Joop de Kraker,&nbsp;Shanxing Gong,&nbsp;Jenny A. Hodgson,&nbsp;Shudong Luo,&nbsp;Jozef J. M. van der Steen,&nbsp;Haijun Xiao,&nbsp;Fang Wang,&nbsp;Xiaowei Tie,&nbsp;Zheng Chen,&nbsp;Yi Zou","doi":"10.1111/1365-2664.14701","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1365-2664.14701","url":null,"abstract":"<p>\u0000 \u0000 </p>","PeriodicalId":15016,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Ecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141550574","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Migration of humans fleeing conflict in the Lake Chad region may increase pressures on natural resources in Lake Fitri (Chad): A case study on waterbirds 逃离乍得湖地区冲突的人口迁移可能会增加菲特里湖(乍得)自然资源的压力:水鸟案例研究
IF 5 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Pub Date : 2024-07-02 DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.14700
Nicolas Carenton, Pierre Defos du Rau, Abakar Saleh Wachoum, Delphine Ducros, Marie Suet, Clémence Deschamps, Maxime Rotoudjimbaye Betoloum, Julien Birard, M' Baïti Narcisse Djimasngar, Yves Kayser, Ib Krag Petersen, Jaime Dias, Mahamat Adoum Wachoum, Bruno Portier, Audrey Mbagogo Koumbraït, Sébastien Le Bel, Jean-Yves Mondain-Monval

可持续捕获野生动物是粮食安全和保护的一个主要问题。在非洲,捕获野生动物主要是为了维持生计,这仍然是一个挑战。在这项研究中,我们以水鸟为自然资源模型,通过菲特里湖(乍得)的副渔获物评估了捕捞的可持续性。我们通过连续四年(2018-2021 年)的空中距离采样估算了 24 个目标分类群的丰度,同时通过采访约 5500 名渔民中的 105 个样本估算了捕获鸟类的数量。通过对其潜在的过度增长进行建模,我们发现包括濒临灭绝的黑冠鹤 Balearica pavonina 在内的四个物种存在过度开发的高风险,这可能是由于逃离博科圣地安全危机的渔民大量涌入菲特里湖所致。综述与应用:这项工作很可能是对非洲鸟类收获可持续性的首次定量研究。它有助于填补《非洲-欧亚水鸟协定》和《拉姆萨尔公约》等多个多边环境协定战略规划中的方法和信息空白。特别是,这项工作有助于在拉姆萨尔遗址管理计划中实施自然资源(包括鸟类)的适应性管理。菲特里湖等非洲湿地在中期内可能无法为武装冲突迫使流离失所的平民进入这些生物多样性据点提供足够的自然资源。
{"title":"Migration of humans fleeing conflict in the Lake Chad region may increase pressures on natural resources in Lake Fitri (Chad): A case study on waterbirds","authors":"Nicolas Carenton,&nbsp;Pierre Defos du Rau,&nbsp;Abakar Saleh Wachoum,&nbsp;Delphine Ducros,&nbsp;Marie Suet,&nbsp;Clémence Deschamps,&nbsp;Maxime Rotoudjimbaye Betoloum,&nbsp;Julien Birard,&nbsp;M' Baïti Narcisse Djimasngar,&nbsp;Yves Kayser,&nbsp;Ib Krag Petersen,&nbsp;Jaime Dias,&nbsp;Mahamat Adoum Wachoum,&nbsp;Bruno Portier,&nbsp;Audrey Mbagogo Koumbraït,&nbsp;Sébastien Le Bel,&nbsp;Jean-Yves Mondain-Monval","doi":"10.1111/1365-2664.14700","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1365-2664.14700","url":null,"abstract":"<p>\u0000 \u0000 </p>","PeriodicalId":15016,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Ecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1365-2664.14700","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141550457","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Balancing bioenergy expansion and restoration: Global shifts in biodiversity intactness 平衡生物能源扩张与恢复:生物多样性完整性的全球变化
IF 5.7 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.14695
Sophie Jane Tudge, Richard Murphy, Zoe M. Harris, Adriana De Palma
To combat climate change, bioenergy is expected to play a more substantial role in the global energy mix, necessitating the expansion of energy crop plantations during the 21st century. Low‐quality or abandoned agricultural land is commonly proposed for growing energy crops. However, restoring such agricultural land back to natural vegetation is also key for global biodiversity conservation and carbon sequestration. Thus, understanding the ecological implications of land‐use changes involving both energy crop plantations and restoration is required. Here, we use biodiversity data to calculate the Biodiversity Intactness Index (BII) in different land uses, including energy crop plantations. We combine our BII models with maps of land use, crop yields and priority areas for restoration to estimate the effects on BII of changes in land use, from the current day, due to bioenergy expansion. We then compare the effects on BII of replacing either any land with energy crops, or only existing agricultural land that is a priority for restoration. Finally, we contrast the effects on BII of planting energy crops versus restoring natural vegetation in priority areas for restoration. Planting energy crops in places with relatively high amounts of natural vegetation and high BII would substantially reduce BII. Planting energy crops only on existing agricultural land that is a priority for restoration would result in less negative effects on BII than planting such crops in high BII areas, and small increases in BII in places with less remaining natural vegetation. However, restoring natural vegetation in priority areas, rather than expanding energy crops, would result in better outcomes for BII. Contrasting the spatial effects on BII of planting energy crops compared with restoring natural vegetation highlights places where energy crops could be the least detrimental to BII, such as Central Europe and the east coasts of the USA and China. Synthesis and applications. While restoration is the best strategy for biodiversity, planting energy crops on agricultural land rather than replacing natural vegetation could minimise losses in biodiversity intactness. However, achieving targets for bioenergy, climate change and restoration will require strategic land‐use planning to minimise ecological compromises.
为了应对气候变化,预计生物能源将在全球能源组合中发挥更大的作用,因此有必要在 21 世纪扩大能源作物种植。低质量或废弃的农田通常被建议用于种植能源作物。然而,将这些农田恢复为自然植被也是保护全球生物多样性和固碳的关键。因此,需要了解涉及能源作物种植和恢复的土地利用变化对生态的影响。在此,我们利用生物多样性数据来计算不同土地用途(包括能源作物种植园)的生物多样性完好性指数(BII)。我们将生物多样性完好指数模型与土地利用、作物产量和优先恢复区域地图相结合,以估算生物能源扩张导致的土地利用变化对生物多样性完好指数的影响。然后,我们比较了用能源作物替代任何土地或仅替代优先恢复的现有农业用地对 BII 的影响。最后,我们对比了在优先恢复区域种植能源作物和恢复自然植被对生物多样性指数的影响。在自然植被相对较多且生物多样性指数较高的地方种植能源作物,将大大降低生物多样性指数。与在高 BII 地区种植能源作物相比,仅在优先恢复的现有农业用地上种植能源作物对 BII 的负面影响较小,而在剩余自然植被较少的地方种植能源作物,BII 会略有增加。然而,在重点地区恢复自然植被,而不是扩大能源作物种植,会对生物多样性指数产生更好的结果。对比种植能源作物和恢复自然植被对生物圈保护区的空间影响,可以发现能源作物对生物圈保护区的损害最小的地区,如中欧、美国东海岸和中国。综述与应用。虽然恢复是生物多样性的最佳策略,但在农业用地上种植能源作物而不是取代自然植被,可以最大限度地减少生物多样性完整性的损失。然而,要实现生物能源、气候变化和恢复的目标,就必须进行战略性土地利用规划,以尽量减少对生态的损害。
{"title":"Balancing bioenergy expansion and restoration: Global shifts in biodiversity intactness","authors":"Sophie Jane Tudge, Richard Murphy, Zoe M. Harris, Adriana De Palma","doi":"10.1111/1365-2664.14695","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.14695","url":null,"abstract":"<jats:list> <jats:list-item>To combat climate change, bioenergy is expected to play a more substantial role in the global energy mix, necessitating the expansion of energy crop plantations during the 21st century. Low‐quality or abandoned agricultural land is commonly proposed for growing energy crops. However, restoring such agricultural land back to natural vegetation is also key for global biodiversity conservation and carbon sequestration. Thus, understanding the ecological implications of land‐use changes involving both energy crop plantations and restoration is required.</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>Here, we use biodiversity data to calculate the Biodiversity Intactness Index (BII) in different land uses, including energy crop plantations. We combine our BII models with maps of land use, crop yields and priority areas for restoration to estimate the effects on BII of changes in land use, from the current day, due to bioenergy expansion. We then compare the effects on BII of replacing either any land with energy crops, or only existing agricultural land that is a priority for restoration. Finally, we contrast the effects on BII of planting energy crops versus restoring natural vegetation in priority areas for restoration.</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>Planting energy crops in places with relatively high amounts of natural vegetation and high BII would substantially reduce BII.</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>Planting energy crops only on existing agricultural land that is a priority for restoration would result in less negative effects on BII than planting such crops in high BII areas, and small increases in BII in places with less remaining natural vegetation. However, restoring natural vegetation in priority areas, rather than expanding energy crops, would result in better outcomes for BII.</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>Contrasting the spatial effects on BII of planting energy crops compared with restoring natural vegetation highlights places where energy crops could be the least detrimental to BII, such as Central Europe and the east coasts of the USA and China.</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item><jats:italic>Synthesis and applications</jats:italic>. While restoration is the best strategy for biodiversity, planting energy crops on agricultural land rather than replacing natural vegetation could minimise losses in biodiversity intactness. However, achieving targets for bioenergy, climate change and restoration will require strategic land‐use planning to minimise ecological compromises.</jats:list-item> </jats:list>","PeriodicalId":15016,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Ecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141527641","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Plant species composition and key-species abundance drive ecosystem multifunctionality 植物物种组成和关键物种丰度驱动生态系统的多功能性
IF 5 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.14717
Xinshuai Li, Youchao Chen, Feng Liu, Xiaoli Cheng, Quanfa Zhang, Kerong Zhang

全球生物多样性的丧失引起了人们对植物群落在推动生态系统功能方面作用的极大兴趣。人们对土壤特性、植物丰富度和植物群落组成如何相互作用影响生态系统多功能性的了解还很有限。我们通过同时操纵土壤来源(即肥沃的农田土壤和相对贫瘠的裸地土壤)、植物丰富度和群落组成(单一品种的单一栽培,以及所有可能的五种植物的两品种、三品种和四品种组合)进行了一个构建生态系统实验,以评估它们对生态系统多功能性的影响,这些多功能性与生物量积累、植物体内的碳(C)和氮(N)、温室气体排放、土壤养分、土壤氮固定以及氮和磷的矿化有关。我们发现,生态系统多功能性受到土壤来源、植物群落组成和植物生物量群落加权平均值(CWM)的显著影响,但不受植物丰富度的影响。我们将群落组成分为固氮植物组(包括固氮植物)和非固氮植物组(不包括固氮植物)。在两种土壤来源中,固氮植物组的多功能性都明显高于非固氮物种组。在裸地土壤中,多功能性随着群落中Albizia julibrissin(固氮物种)相对丰度和生物量比率的增加而增加,但随着Platycladus orientalis(非固氮物种)生物量比率的增加而减少。在农田土壤中,多功能性随土荆芥(非固氮物种)的丰度和鹅掌楸的生物量比率的增加而增加,但随白桑树(非固氮物种)的丰度和生物量比率的增加而减少。这些结果表明,在不同的土壤条件下,决定生态系统多功能性的关键物种是不同的。综述与应用:我们提出,植物群落的组成以及关键物种的相对丰度和生物量比例是生态系统多功能性的驱动因素。我们建议,在生态恢复项目中应重视在不同土壤条件下选择合适的植物组合。我们的研究强调了关键物种在不同资源条件下对生态系统功能的不同作用。一般来说,固氮作用在生态系统多功能性中起着至关重要的作用,而固氮植物可作为营养贫瘠退化土地的修复工具。
{"title":"Plant species composition and key-species abundance drive ecosystem multifunctionality","authors":"Xinshuai Li,&nbsp;Youchao Chen,&nbsp;Feng Liu,&nbsp;Xiaoli Cheng,&nbsp;Quanfa Zhang,&nbsp;Kerong Zhang","doi":"10.1111/1365-2664.14717","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1365-2664.14717","url":null,"abstract":"<p>\u0000 \u0000 </p>","PeriodicalId":15016,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Ecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141504729","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Negative association of sea lice from fish farms on recreational fishing catches of Atlantic salmon 养鱼场的海虱与大西洋鲑鱼休闲渔业渔获量的负面关系
IF 5 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Pub Date : 2024-06-27 DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.14712
Mari Lie Larsen, Irja Vormedal, Knut W. Vollset

鲑鱼养殖场的海虱(Lepeophtheirus salmonis)侵扰是否以及在多大程度上影响野生大西洋鲑鱼的生存,这个问题一直受到科学界的争论和政治界的争议。记录海虱对野生鲑鱼的种群水平影响本身仍具有挑战性。我们利用挪威全面的海虱数据和休闲渔获量数据,评估养殖场海虱侵扰对不同产区(PA)野生鲑鱼渔获量的影响。我们的分析发现,野生大西洋鲑鱼产量的下降与每平方公里成年雌性海虱数量的增加之间存在明显的相关性。这种影响在挪威西海岸的第4生产区最为明显,该地区属于政府的 "红绿灯 "管理系统范围,在这里,外迁的大马哈鱼幼鱼被认为面临着由虱子引起的高死亡风险。根据我们的模型预测,在某些产区,当海虱总量超过平均每条养殖鱼0.1只成年雌性海虱的上限时,渔获量将低于平均水平。此外,我们的结果表明,当鲑鱼养殖场超过这一限制时,低于平均渔获量的风险会增加约 47%(估计风险比为 1.47,95% CI [1.10, 1.96])。综述与应用:我们的研究扩展了现有的证据体系,这些证据表明鱼类养殖与野生鲑鱼种群提供的生态系统服务之间存在负相关。这对水产养殖管理具有重要意义。首先,它表明养殖场海虱直接影响到依赖野生鲑鱼种群生存的人民、权利人和利益集团,如土地所有者和垂钓者。其次,研究表明,0.1 的海虱限制可能不足以防止某些地区的渔获量低于标准。此外,在允许养殖鲑鱼生物量进一步增长的背景下,为整个产区设定绝对海虱限额可能比为每条养殖鱼设定平均海虱限额更有效。我们的研究结果有助于为在养殖场和区域范围内设定适当的虱子限额提供科学依据。
{"title":"Negative association of sea lice from fish farms on recreational fishing catches of Atlantic salmon","authors":"Mari Lie Larsen,&nbsp;Irja Vormedal,&nbsp;Knut W. Vollset","doi":"10.1111/1365-2664.14712","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1365-2664.14712","url":null,"abstract":"<p>\u0000 \u0000 </p>","PeriodicalId":15016,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Ecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1365-2664.14712","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141527689","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
England's statutory biodiversity metric enhances plant, but not bird nor butterfly, biodiversity 英格兰的法定生物多样性指标增强了植物的生物多样性,但没有增强鸟类和蝴蝶的生物多样性
IF 5 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Pub Date : 2024-06-27 DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.14697
Cicely A. M. Marshall, Kristian Wade, Isla S. Kendall, Hannah Porcher, Jakob Poffley, Andrew J. Bladon, Lynn V. Dicks, Jo Treweek

生物多样性净收益是全球政策的重点,承认生物多样性因发展而不断丧失,并承诺抵消对其他地方生物多样性的任何残余影响。至少有 37 个国家制定了强制性抵消政策,另有 64 个国家实行自愿抵消。抵消依赖于可信和基于证据的方法来量化生物多样性的损失和收益。英国于 2021 年 11 月推出《环境法案》后,英格兰所有需要规划许可的新开发项目都必须证明从 2024 年起至少有 10%的生物多样性净收益,计算方法是法定的生物多样性度量框架。该指标使用栖息地作为生物多样性的代表,对栖息地的内在独特性和当前状况进行评分。我们对该指标在全英格兰生物多样性成果方面的表现进行了研究。我们使用广义线性混合模型,将生物多样性基线单位与生物多样性的五个久负盛名的单一属性代用指标(物种丰富度、个体丰度、受威胁物种数量、平均物种范围和平均物种范围/种群变化)进行回归。从 24 个地点收集了属于三个常用指标类群(维管束植物、蝴蝶和鸟类)的物种数据,其中包括除城市以外的所有陆地广义栖息地。在基线评估中,公制生物多样性单位与大多数植物生物多样性变量相关,但与本研究中使用的鸟类或蝴蝶生物多样性变量无关。与基线生物多样性单位较低的栖息地相比,基线生物多样性单位较高的栖息地中记录的植物物种的平均分布范围略受限制(斜率为 -16.22 ± 1.52,p < 0.001),且过去的衰退程度更严重(斜率为 -0.02 ± 0.00,p < 0.001)。每增加一个基线生物多样性单位,植物物种丰富度就会增加 1%(p < 0.01)。综合与应用:使用法定生物多样性指标来定义 10%的生物多样性净收益,而不进行额外的物种保护管理,很可能会导致植物生物多样性的微小收益以及鸟类和蝴蝶的微不足道的收益。我们提出了具体建议,以提高该指标在实现理想的生物多样性成果方面的功效。我们的研究结果为其他有意制定支持生物多样性净收益政策的指标的国家提供了宝贵的案例研究。
{"title":"England's statutory biodiversity metric enhances plant, but not bird nor butterfly, biodiversity","authors":"Cicely A. M. Marshall,&nbsp;Kristian Wade,&nbsp;Isla S. Kendall,&nbsp;Hannah Porcher,&nbsp;Jakob Poffley,&nbsp;Andrew J. Bladon,&nbsp;Lynn V. Dicks,&nbsp;Jo Treweek","doi":"10.1111/1365-2664.14697","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1365-2664.14697","url":null,"abstract":"<p>\u0000 \u0000 </p>","PeriodicalId":15016,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Ecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1365-2664.14697","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141529133","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
How does geology influence the effect of land use on stream macroinvertebrate communities? 地质如何影响土地利用对溪流大型无脊椎动物群落的影响?
IF 5 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Pub Date : 2024-06-24 DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.14703
Harriet A. Hunter, Ian C. Fuller, Russell G. Death

溪流周围的集水区地质和土地利用都会影响侵蚀造成的细沉积物沉积程度及其对溪流大型无脊椎动物群落的影响。虽然地质和土地利用已被证明会单独影响溪流群落,但它们之间的相互作用却较少受到关注。我们研究了地质和土地利用对新西兰泰拉维蒂地区溪流大型无脊椎动物群落的影响。该地区的溪流流经较硬的砂岩以及较软的页岩和泥岩,后者是世界上侵蚀率最高的地区之一。2016 年至 2018 年期间,每年都会在 80 个地点采集溪流中的大型无脊椎动物样本,这些地点分别位于外来森林、本土森林和牧场,溪流流经地质坚硬或松软的集水区。牧场和外来森林溪流的电导率几乎是本土森林溪流的两倍,软沉积物溪流的电导率高于硬沉积物溪流。软沉积物溪流的沉积物覆盖率高于硬沉积物溪流,牧场溪流和外来森林溪流的沉积物覆盖率高于本地森林溪流。不同土地用途的围岩覆盖率没有差异,但软沉积物溪流的围岩覆盖率更高。原生林地的生态健康水平较高,外来林地居中,牧场溪流最低。在每种土地用途中,硬沉积物溪流的生物指数也高于软沉积物溪流。无脊椎动物群落似乎主要由沉积的细沉积物量和电导率决定,而在软底溪流、外来森林溪流和牧场溪流中,细沉积物量和电导率均高于硬底溪流。综述与应用:我们的研究结果表明,地质与土地利用之间存在着复杂而强烈的相互作用,从而对溪流大型无脊椎动物群落产生了影响。与类似的硬底溪流相比,软底溪流与牧场或外来森林土地利用的结合更为有害。因此,在以软沉积物地质为主的集水区,任何特定土地用途的管理条例都需要更加严格。
{"title":"How does geology influence the effect of land use on stream macroinvertebrate communities?","authors":"Harriet A. Hunter,&nbsp;Ian C. Fuller,&nbsp;Russell G. Death","doi":"10.1111/1365-2664.14703","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1365-2664.14703","url":null,"abstract":"<p>\u0000 \u0000 </p>","PeriodicalId":15016,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Ecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141504730","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Severity of topsoil compaction controls the impact of skid trails on soil ecological processes 表土压实的严重程度控制着滑行道对土壤生态过程的影响
IF 5 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Pub Date : 2024-06-24 DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.14708
Theresa Klein-Raufhake, Norbert Hölzel, Jens Jakob Schaper, Anja Hortmann, Michael Elmer, Max Fornfeist, Britta Linnemann, Michael Meyer, Katharina Rentemeister, Lea Santora, Jens Wöllecke, Ute Hamer

在温带森林生态系统中,滑行道是一种主要的管理诱导干扰,对土壤生态过程有相当大的影响,但迄今为止人们对其了解甚少。在德国森林中,滑行道占森林面积的 10%-20%,可能受到重型机械造成的土壤压实的影响。我们在中欧四种森林类型的 84 个配对地块上系统地研究了滑行道对土壤物理、化学和微生物参数的影响。在地形较为陡峭的低山森林中,滑行道的影响比在低地森林中更为剧烈。低山地区的滑行道显示微生物生物量的碳氮比(MBC/MBN)降低,微生物(MBC/SOC)和酶活性增加,导致碳周转加快(碳氮比降低,EOC/EN),土壤中的二氧化碳损失(CO2/SOC)增加。滑行道对低地森林的总体影响较小。在基质贫瘠的土壤上,我们发现 MBC/MBN 比率有所上升,而在基质丰富的低地土壤上,滑行道显示 CO2/SOC 有所下降,这表明土壤碳储量成比例增加。无论特定地区的影响如何,细粒土壤容重的相对增加被认为是决定滑行道对许多土壤参数影响的 "黄金特征",这表现在与 SOC、N、MBC、MBN、MBP、MBC/SOC 和 CO2/SOC 呈负相关,与某些水解酶的活性呈正相关。合成与应用:我们的数据清楚地表明,在坡度相对较陡的低山区,导致碳和养分大量流失的碳转化过程和土壤呼吸作用在滑道上显著增加,这与低地形成鲜明对比。我们的研究结果具有很强的环境依赖性,这表明必须以高空间分辨率绘制坡度、基质和湿度方面的土壤条件图,以评估重型机械对土壤压实的脆弱性。在这种脆弱性分析的基础上,可以通过指定永久固定的滑行道、对车辆进行技术改造(如宽底轮胎)以及仔细规划和安排管理作业的时间,将负面影响降至最低。
{"title":"Severity of topsoil compaction controls the impact of skid trails on soil ecological processes","authors":"Theresa Klein-Raufhake,&nbsp;Norbert Hölzel,&nbsp;Jens Jakob Schaper,&nbsp;Anja Hortmann,&nbsp;Michael Elmer,&nbsp;Max Fornfeist,&nbsp;Britta Linnemann,&nbsp;Michael Meyer,&nbsp;Katharina Rentemeister,&nbsp;Lea Santora,&nbsp;Jens Wöllecke,&nbsp;Ute Hamer","doi":"10.1111/1365-2664.14708","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1365-2664.14708","url":null,"abstract":"<p>\u0000 \u0000 </p>","PeriodicalId":15016,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Ecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1365-2664.14708","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141527690","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Forest composition shapes seed-rodent interactions in a gradient of broadleaves and conifers 森林组成决定了阔叶林和针叶林梯度中种子与鼠类的相互作用
IF 5 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Pub Date : 2024-06-24 DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.14711
Pedro Mittelman, Scott M. Appleby, Niko Balkenhol

在林业实践中,越来越多地采用非本地树种和混交林作为应对气候变化的保障措施,以及在提供经济效益的同时促进生物多样性的工具。虽然森林组成的这些变化可能会影响动物群落和生态系统过程,但很少从植物与动物相互作用的角度对其进行研究。在这里,我们研究了不同比例的本地阔叶树(Fagus sylvatica)和两种针叶树(引进的Pseudotsuga menziesii和本地的Picea abies)森林如何影响啮齿动物及其与种子的相互作用。我们调查了陆生小型哺乳动物群落,估算了物种密度,评估了啮齿动物对种子的偏好,收集了环境变量数据(林下密度和树木基部面积),测量了落叶松种子的产量,并在德国北部落叶松萌发年和非萌发年的 20 个不同森林地块中追踪了 1200 颗落叶松种子。森林组成影响了啮齿动物与种子之间的相互作用。在阔叶树比例较低的森林中,榉树种子被采收的速度更快、数量更大、存活率更低、被贮藏的次数更少。这些结果与其他三项发现一致:(a)种子的命运与阔叶树和针叶树的比例有关,而与针叶树的特性无关;(b)啮齿动物更喜欢营养丰富的榉树种子,而不是小针叶树种子;(c)在榉树种子稀少的时期(非歉收年),啮齿动物收获的种子比例更高。综述与应用:这项研究提供了森林组成如何影响植物与动物相互作用的证据,而不一定会改变动物群落或种群密度。具体来说,我们发现,在小型哺乳动物群落、种子与啮齿动物的相互作用或种子命运方面,原生针叶树森林与非原生针叶树森林之间没有差异。此外,在混交林中,啮齿类动物可能主要捕食竞争性较强的针叶树(Fagus sylvatica)的种子,从而缓解山毛榉对针叶树的优势地位。
{"title":"Forest composition shapes seed-rodent interactions in a gradient of broadleaves and conifers","authors":"Pedro Mittelman,&nbsp;Scott M. Appleby,&nbsp;Niko Balkenhol","doi":"10.1111/1365-2664.14711","DOIUrl":"10.1111/1365-2664.14711","url":null,"abstract":"<p>\u0000 \u0000 </p>","PeriodicalId":15016,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Ecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1365-2664.14711","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141504731","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Applied Ecology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1