Steel frames repaired after fire show markedly different collapse behavior under extreme loads compared to ambient conditions. In this study, steel beam-column subassemblies using extended end-plate connections were initially exposed to fire. After cooling to ambient temperature, three strengthening strategies were applied to retrofit the structure. Subsequently, sudden column-removal tests were conducted to evaluate the dynamic performance after fire, followed by quasi-static pushdown tests to determine the residual collapse resistance once the dynamic effects subsided. The experimental resistance functions were then used to calibrate a refined single-degree-of-freedom (SDOF) model for predicting dynamic ultimate load. The results show that although strengthening had little effect on the maximum middle joint displacement during the dynamic phase, it effectively reduced the residual displacement in the stabilized phase by redistributing load paths and maintaining continuous participation throughout the deformation process. All strengthening strategies improved the initial stiffness of post-fire specimens, but the effect was confined to small deformations; after the first load drop, resistance rapidly deteriorated, revealing the intrinsic limitations of the strengthening mechanisms. The dynamic stiffness obtained from the middle column response was consistent with the initial stiffness from the pushdown test, indicating that using residual test data in the SDOF model is reasonable. Overall, perimeter weld strengthening demonstrated the most effective strengthening performance among the examined strategies.
扫码关注我们
求助内容:
应助结果提醒方式:
