This work introduces a physically based modeling framework to capture the spatio-temporal dynamics of dune vegetation under stochastic environmental disturbances. The model evaluates vegetation cover in response to random wind speed and runup within a cross-shore dimensionless framework. The wind speed is modeled as a compound Poisson process with Gamma-distributed properties, facilitating the computation of up-crossing times for various thresholds. The dune topography is represented by a swash zone with a Gaussian shape and a monotonic landward increase, parameterized by slope, wavelength, and height. Key disturbance conditions affecting vegetation, that is, runup-induced flooding in the swash zone and wind-induced scour on the backshore and crest, are addressed through threshold-based analysis. The model uses a state-dependent dichotomic process for vegetation dynamics, where growth and decay are influenced by external forcing and vegetation state. Analytical solutions of the master equation for the vegetation distributions reveal the impact of stochastic factors on vegetation growth and stability. Sensitivity analysis identifies dune steepness, forcing magnitude and variability, and relative roughness as critical parameters. These factors significantly affect vegetation distribution, with increased steepness leading to higher vegetation density at the backshore and reduced density at the shorefront. Validation is carried out against satellite imagery and high-resolution real elevation data from the U.S. coastline and confirms the robustness and accuracy of the proposed approach. The results enhance understanding of dune vegetation dynamics and offer a framework for coastal restoration strategies.
{"title":"Stochastic Dynamics of Coastal Dune Vegetation","authors":"C. Camporeale, M. Latella","doi":"10.1029/2025JF008610","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1029/2025JF008610","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This work introduces a physically based modeling framework to capture the spatio-temporal dynamics of dune vegetation under stochastic environmental disturbances. The model evaluates vegetation cover in response to random wind speed and runup within a cross-shore dimensionless framework. The wind speed is modeled as a compound Poisson process with Gamma-distributed properties, facilitating the computation of up-crossing times for various thresholds. The dune topography is represented by a swash zone with a Gaussian shape and a monotonic landward increase, parameterized by slope, wavelength, and height. Key disturbance conditions affecting vegetation, that is, runup-induced flooding in the swash zone and wind-induced scour on the backshore and crest, are addressed through threshold-based analysis. The model uses a state-dependent dichotomic process for vegetation dynamics, where growth and decay are influenced by external forcing and vegetation state. Analytical solutions of the master equation for the vegetation distributions reveal the impact of stochastic factors on vegetation growth and stability. Sensitivity analysis identifies dune steepness, forcing magnitude and variability, and relative roughness as critical parameters. These factors significantly affect vegetation distribution, with increased steepness leading to higher vegetation density at the backshore and reduced density at the shorefront. Validation is carried out against satellite imagery and high-resolution real elevation data from the U.S. coastline and confirms the robustness and accuracy of the proposed approach. The results enhance understanding of dune vegetation dynamics and offer a framework for coastal restoration strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":15887,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface","volume":"130 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2025JF008610","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145572270","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Rose V. Palermo, Jennifer L. Miselis, Daniel J. Ciarletta, Emily Wei
Barrier island resilience to climate impacts depends on sediment redistribution between the subaqueous shoreface and subaerial barrier during sea-level rise and storms. However, autogenic interactions between the upper and lower shoreface and their influence on the subaerial barrier are poorly characterized. Here, we explore the influences of various shoreface components on barrier morphology using a model of barrier and shoreface evolution under sea-level rise, the Articulated Barrier Shoreface (ABSF) Model. This reduced-complexity model divides the shoreface into upper and lower shoreface panels that respond independently to sea-level rise and deviations from the equilibrium slope. We couple the ABSF with the Lorenzo-Trueba & Ashton, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013jf002941 model (LTA), a barrier island evolution model driven by overwash and sea-level rise. Through this coupled framework, we examine the influences of upper and lower shoreface slopes, their respective depths, and sensitivity to wave climate on long-term barrier evolution. Results show that the relative depths of the upper and lower shoreface toes influence barrier response to rising seas, alongside overwash flux and closure depth. Notably, the lower shoreface response to sea-level change lags that of the upper shoreface over decades, diminishing the resilience of the barrier over centennial timescales by slowing the overall barrier response. In fact, the ABSF model predicts barriers will drown faster and more than predicted with a linear shoreface. Results highlight the shoreface as an important sediment reservoir for barrier islands and that differences in upper and lower shoreface responses can reduce barrier resilience to sea-level rise due to limited lower shoreface sediment accessibility.
{"title":"Modeling the Influence of Upper and Lower Shoreface Dynamics on Barrier Island Evolution","authors":"Rose V. Palermo, Jennifer L. Miselis, Daniel J. Ciarletta, Emily Wei","doi":"10.1029/2025JF008391","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1029/2025JF008391","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Barrier island resilience to climate impacts depends on sediment redistribution between the subaqueous shoreface and subaerial barrier during sea-level rise and storms. However, autogenic interactions between the upper and lower shoreface and their influence on the subaerial barrier are poorly characterized. Here, we explore the influences of various shoreface components on barrier morphology using a model of barrier and shoreface evolution under sea-level rise, the Articulated Barrier Shoreface (ABSF) Model. This reduced-complexity model divides the shoreface into upper and lower shoreface panels that respond independently to sea-level rise and deviations from the equilibrium slope. We couple the ABSF with the Lorenzo-Trueba & Ashton, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013jf002941 model (LTA), a barrier island evolution model driven by overwash and sea-level rise. Through this coupled framework, we examine the influences of upper and lower shoreface slopes, their respective depths, and sensitivity to wave climate on long-term barrier evolution. Results show that the relative depths of the upper and lower shoreface toes influence barrier response to rising seas, alongside overwash flux and closure depth. Notably, the lower shoreface response to sea-level change lags that of the upper shoreface over decades, diminishing the resilience of the barrier over centennial timescales by slowing the overall barrier response. In fact, the ABSF model predicts barriers will drown faster and more than predicted with a linear shoreface. Results highlight the shoreface as an important sediment reservoir for barrier islands and that differences in upper and lower shoreface responses can reduce barrier resilience to sea-level rise due to limited lower shoreface sediment accessibility.</p>","PeriodicalId":15887,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface","volume":"130 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2025JF008391","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145572271","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Raffaele Spielmann, Tobias Schöffl, Roland Kaitna, Jordan Aaron
Debris flows are frequent natural hazards whose destructiveness is controlled by the dynamics of their flow fronts, surges behind the front and large boulders. Understanding the mechanisms underlying the spatiotemporal variations in flow depth and velocity is limited by a lack of catchment-scale measurements. In this study, we present and analyze flow-depth and velocity measurements from a new monitoring setup which consists of high-frequency 3D LiDAR scanners installed at three different locations along the active debris-flow fan of the Illgraben. For the event analyzed herein, we observe that (a) the LiDAR-based velocities are in excellent agreement with measurements from a Pulse-Doppler (PD) radar and with manually tracked feature velocities; (b) the flow front decelerates as it travels along the fan and a watery pre-surge develops, likely due to a combination of segregation and vertical shear, which transport woody debris and small boulders to the front, as well as a horizontal velocity profile, required for transportation of large boulders through a mechanism we term “centerline advection”; (c) roll waves begin to develop on the lower part of the fan by coalescence of free surface instabilities and they exceed the front velocity by up to 2