Pub Date : 2025-12-09DOI: 10.1186/s10194-025-02225-7
Jeremias Antinew, Robert J Fountaine, Vittorio Loprinzo, Esther Straghan, Sergey Dubrovin, Patrizia DeBesi, Nick Vatakis, Terence Fullerton
Background: Rimegepant is a small-molecule calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist approved in adults for acute treatment of migraine (with or without aura) and preventive treatment of episodic migraine (EM). Rimegepant is well tolerated at approved doses; 75 mg as needed up to once per day for acute treatment and 75 mg every other day for preventive treatment. This study evaluated long-term safety and tolerability of once-daily (QD) rimegepant 75 mg for EM prevention.
Methods: Adults with 4-14 migraine attacks per month received open-label oral rimegepant 75 mg QD for up to 24 weeks. Standard-of-care medications for acute treatment of migraine and stable dosing of preventive migraine medications were permitted. Endpoints included on-treatment adverse events (AEs) occurring in ≥5% of participants, on-treatment serious AEs, on-treatment AEs leading to rimegepant discontinuation, and on-treatment grade 3-4 laboratory test abnormalities. Efficacy was not assessed in this study.
Results: Overall, 250 participants (female = 82.4%, White = 86.4%, mean age = 42.6 years) received ≥1 dose of rimegepant and 74.8% completed open-label treatment. Mean (SD) time on rimegepant was 19.3 (8.7) weeks. Overall, 53.6% of participants had ≥1 on-treatment AE, none had a serious AE, 1.6% had a severe AE, and 2.8% had an AE leading to rimegepant discontinuation. On-treatment AEs occurring in ≥5% of participants included nasopharyngitis (9.2%), COVID-19 (6.4%), and nausea (6.0%). On-treatment grade 3-4 laboratory test abnormalities included low lymphocytes (0.4%), high creatine kinase (3.8%), low glucose (0.4%), high low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C; 9.8%), high fasting LDL-C (9.3%), high non-fasting LDL-C (10.2%), high potassium (1.3%), high triglycerides (0.9%), high fasting triglycerides (1.3%), and urine glucose (0.5%). No on-treatment elevations in liver transaminases (alanine aminotransferase [ALT] or aspartate aminotransferase [AST]) > 5× the upper limit of normal (ULN) or potential Hy's law cases (ALT or AST > 3× the ULN concurrent with total bilirubin levels > 2× the ULN) were observed.
Conclusion: Rimegepant 75 mg QD for up to 24 weeks had a favorable safety profile for preventive treatment of EM.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05207865 (registered January 12, 2022).
{"title":"A phase 4, 24-week, open-label study to evaluate the safety and tolerability of once-daily dosing of 75 mg rimegepant for episodic migraine prevention.","authors":"Jeremias Antinew, Robert J Fountaine, Vittorio Loprinzo, Esther Straghan, Sergey Dubrovin, Patrizia DeBesi, Nick Vatakis, Terence Fullerton","doi":"10.1186/s10194-025-02225-7","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s10194-025-02225-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rimegepant is a small-molecule calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist approved in adults for acute treatment of migraine (with or without aura) and preventive treatment of episodic migraine (EM). Rimegepant is well tolerated at approved doses; 75 mg as needed up to once per day for acute treatment and 75 mg every other day for preventive treatment. This study evaluated long-term safety and tolerability of once-daily (QD) rimegepant 75 mg for EM prevention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adults with 4-14 migraine attacks per month received open-label oral rimegepant 75 mg QD for up to 24 weeks. Standard-of-care medications for acute treatment of migraine and stable dosing of preventive migraine medications were permitted. Endpoints included on-treatment adverse events (AEs) occurring in ≥5% of participants, on-treatment serious AEs, on-treatment AEs leading to rimegepant discontinuation, and on-treatment grade 3-4 laboratory test abnormalities. Efficacy was not assessed in this study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 250 participants (female = 82.4%, White = 86.4%, mean age = 42.6 years) received ≥1 dose of rimegepant and 74.8% completed open-label treatment. Mean (SD) time on rimegepant was 19.3 (8.7) weeks. Overall, 53.6% of participants had ≥1 on-treatment AE, none had a serious AE, 1.6% had a severe AE, and 2.8% had an AE leading to rimegepant discontinuation. On-treatment AEs occurring in ≥5% of participants included nasopharyngitis (9.2%), COVID-19 (6.4%), and nausea (6.0%). On-treatment grade 3-4 laboratory test abnormalities included low lymphocytes (0.4%), high creatine kinase (3.8%), low glucose (0.4%), high low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C; 9.8%), high fasting LDL-C (9.3%), high non-fasting LDL-C (10.2%), high potassium (1.3%), high triglycerides (0.9%), high fasting triglycerides (1.3%), and urine glucose (0.5%). No on-treatment elevations in liver transaminases (alanine aminotransferase [ALT] or aspartate aminotransferase [AST]) > 5× the upper limit of normal (ULN) or potential Hy's law cases (ALT or AST > 3× the ULN concurrent with total bilirubin levels > 2× the ULN) were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Rimegepant 75 mg QD for up to 24 weeks had a favorable safety profile for preventive treatment of EM.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05207865 (registered January 12, 2022).</p>","PeriodicalId":16013,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Headache and Pain","volume":" ","pages":"17"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12801679/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145714531","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-09DOI: 10.1186/s10194-025-02215-9
Aida Maddahi, Jacob C A Edvinsson, Lars Edvinsson, Diana N Krause
Background: Primary headache disorders such as migraine and cluster headache exhibit circadian and circannual variations in attack onset. Melatonin plays a central role in regulating biological rhythms and likely influences the timing of headache attacks. Recent evidence suggests melatonin may be a promising treatment for migraine and cluster headache; however, underlying mechanisms need to be elucidated. Because of the importance of the trigeminovascular system (TVS) and trigeminal-parasympathetic ganglia in these disorders, we proposed that melatonin receptors (MT1 and MT2) are expressed in these pathways.
Methods: The trigeminal ganglion (TG), sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG), dorsal root ganglion (DRG), basilar artery, dura mater and hypothalamus were dissected from adult male and female rats. RT-qPCR and immunohistochemistry were used to assess the expression of mRNA and protein, respectively, for melatonin MT1 and MT2 receptors.
Results: Immunohistochemical analysis showed MT1 and MT2 were differentially expressed in the TG, SPG and DRG. MT1 was widely distributed in the cytoplasm and nuclei of neurons and satellite glial cells (SGCs) in the TG, while MT2 localized mainly in the cytoplasm of neurons and Aδ-fibers. Both MT1 and MT2 co-localized with CGRP and the CGRP receptor component RAMP1. MT2 immunoreactivity was also found in Aδ-fibers throughout the dura mater and was co-expressed with Contactin-associated protein 1(CASPR) at the paranodal regions of Aδ-fibers. No significant sex differences were found in receptor expression in the TG, although mRNA levels of MT1 were approximately twice as high as those for MT2. In SPG, both receptors co-localized with the neuropeptides VIP and PACAP. In cerebral arteries, only MT1 was detected, and it was localized mainly in endothelial and smooth muscle cells.
Conclusions: This study demonstrates that MT1 and MT2 receptors are expressed in the TVS and SPG, key components involved in migraine and cluster headache. Melatonin receptor co-localization with neuropeptides involved in autonomic and sensory neuronal regulation supports a potential mechanism by which melatonin influences headache onset and progression. Together, these findings support a role for melatonin influences in primary headache pathophysiology and point to its potential for novel headache treatment.
{"title":"Expression of melatonin receptors in trigeminal and sphenopalatine ganglia: potential targets for primary headache disorders.","authors":"Aida Maddahi, Jacob C A Edvinsson, Lars Edvinsson, Diana N Krause","doi":"10.1186/s10194-025-02215-9","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s10194-025-02215-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Primary headache disorders such as migraine and cluster headache exhibit circadian and circannual variations in attack onset. Melatonin plays a central role in regulating biological rhythms and likely influences the timing of headache attacks. Recent evidence suggests melatonin may be a promising treatment for migraine and cluster headache; however, underlying mechanisms need to be elucidated. Because of the importance of the trigeminovascular system (TVS) and trigeminal-parasympathetic ganglia in these disorders, we proposed that melatonin receptors (MT1 and MT2) are expressed in these pathways.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The trigeminal ganglion (TG), sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG), dorsal root ganglion (DRG), basilar artery, dura mater and hypothalamus were dissected from adult male and female rats. RT-qPCR and immunohistochemistry were used to assess the expression of mRNA and protein, respectively, for melatonin MT1 and MT2 receptors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Immunohistochemical analysis showed MT1 and MT2 were differentially expressed in the TG, SPG and DRG. MT1 was widely distributed in the cytoplasm and nuclei of neurons and satellite glial cells (SGCs) in the TG, while MT2 localized mainly in the cytoplasm of neurons and Aδ-fibers. Both MT1 and MT2 co-localized with CGRP and the CGRP receptor component RAMP1. MT2 immunoreactivity was also found in Aδ-fibers throughout the dura mater and was co-expressed with Contactin-associated protein 1(CASPR) at the paranodal regions of Aδ-fibers. No significant sex differences were found in receptor expression in the TG, although mRNA levels of MT1 were approximately twice as high as those for MT2. In SPG, both receptors co-localized with the neuropeptides VIP and PACAP. In cerebral arteries, only MT1 was detected, and it was localized mainly in endothelial and smooth muscle cells.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrates that MT1 and MT2 receptors are expressed in the TVS and SPG, key components involved in migraine and cluster headache. Melatonin receptor co-localization with neuropeptides involved in autonomic and sensory neuronal regulation supports a potential mechanism by which melatonin influences headache onset and progression. Together, these findings support a role for melatonin influences in primary headache pathophysiology and point to its potential for novel headache treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":16013,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Headache and Pain","volume":"26 1","pages":"284"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12690866/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145714509","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Migraine represents the third leading cause of disability-adjusted life years among young females worldwide, responsible for physical and emotional distress along with reduced social functioning. The matter is further complicated by resistance and even refractoriness to the available treatments. Indeed, despite the several therapeutic strategies, remarkably improved by the development of the novel, specific drugs directed towards calcitonin-gene related peptide (CGRP) signalling, 40% patients, also undergoing anti-CGRP therapy, are still difficult-to-treat. The potential role of environmental factors and epigenetic modifications in the pathogenesis of migraine and in the responsiveness to treatments still remains poorly investigated. Moreover, the expression of a wide panel of serum microRNAs was recently related to frequency and features of migraine attacks. Thus, the aim of the present study is to analyze the possible epigenetic mechanisms at the root of differences in migraine features and response to treatments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eligibility criteria, search strategy and information sources are established a priori. PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science were inspected for studies published from database inception to the date of last search on October 2nd, 2025.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A few studies so far support the role of DNA methylation in migraine chronification, indicating that these stable but reversible epigenetic modifications may influence the process of progression and transformation from episodic to chronic migraine. Altered DNA methylation sites were linked to genes involved in synaptic plasticity and estrogen receptor signaling. Up-regulation of circulating miRNAs was reduced following treatment with gepants. Within this complex figure, the role of the transient receptor potential (TRP) vanilloid 1 (TRPV1) in the trigeminal ganglia deserves deep investigation, including the prediction of response to first-line therapies such as triptans. Likewise, TRP ankyrin 1 (TRPA1) expression is subjected to pain-induced epigenetic modifications. DNA methylation and the modulation of histone deacetylase activity are implicated in the mechanisms of action of currently used preventative drugs, such as valproic acid and topiramate, and could serve as biomarkers of drug response. Finally, the role of miRNAs as potential biomarker for predicting the response to novel monoclonal antibodies, such as erenumab, has emerged in recent studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The role of epigenetic modifications of genes involved in the CGRP pathway, synaptic plasticity and TRPV1, TRPA1 and estrogen receptor signaling in migraine is emerging. Therefore, a deeper understanding of the impact of epigenetics in migraine pathophysiology and neuropharmacology is needed to revert chronification and personalize medicine in the field of migraine, improving efficacy and safety of treatments and widening the th
背景:偏头痛是世界范围内年轻女性残疾调整生命年的第三大原因,导致身体和情绪困扰以及社交功能下降。由于现有的治疗方法具有耐药性甚至难治性,使问题进一步复杂化。事实上,尽管有几种治疗策略,随着针对降钙素基因相关肽(CGRP)信号传导的新型特异性药物的发展而显著改善,40%的患者也在接受抗CGRP治疗,仍然难以治疗。环境因素和表观遗传修饰在偏头痛发病机制和对治疗的反应性中的潜在作用仍未得到充分研究。此外,一组广泛的血清microrna的表达最近与偏头痛发作的频率和特征有关。因此,本研究的目的是分析偏头痛特征和治疗反应差异的可能的表观遗传机制。方法:先验地建立资格标准、搜索策略和信息源。我们检查了PubMed、Scopus和Web of Science从数据库建立到最后一次检索日期(2025年10月2日)发表的研究。结果:到目前为止,一些研究支持DNA甲基化在偏头痛慢性化中的作用,表明这些稳定但可逆的表观遗传修饰可能影响偏头痛从发作性到慢性的进展和转变过程。改变的DNA甲基化位点与参与突触可塑性和雌激素受体信号传导的基因有关。使用gepants治疗后,循环mirna的上调减少。在这个复杂的数字中,瞬时受体电位(TRP)香草酸样蛋白1 (TRPV1)在三叉神经节中的作用值得深入研究,包括预测对曲坦类药物等一线治疗的反应。同样,TRP锚蛋白1 (TRPA1)的表达也受到疼痛诱导的表观遗传修饰的影响。DNA甲基化和组蛋白去乙酰化酶活性的调节与目前使用的预防药物(如丙戊酸和托吡酯)的作用机制有关,并可作为药物反应的生物标志物。最后,在最近的研究中,mirna作为预测对新型单克隆抗体(如erenumab)反应的潜在生物标志物的作用已经出现。结论:CGRP通路、突触可塑性、TRPV1、TRPA1和雌激素受体信号通路相关基因的表观遗传修饰在偏头痛中的作用正在逐渐显现。因此,需要更深入地了解表观遗传学在偏头痛病理生理和神经药理学中的影响,以恢复偏头痛领域的慢性化和个性化治疗,提高治疗的有效性和安全性,扩大治疗范围。
{"title":"Epigenetics in migraine: the Junior Editorial Board Members' vision.","authors":"Damiana Scuteri, Alejandro Labastida-Ramirez, Eloisa Rubio-Beltran, Doga Vuralli, Agnese Onofri","doi":"10.1186/s10194-025-02240-8","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s10194-025-02240-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Migraine represents the third leading cause of disability-adjusted life years among young females worldwide, responsible for physical and emotional distress along with reduced social functioning. The matter is further complicated by resistance and even refractoriness to the available treatments. Indeed, despite the several therapeutic strategies, remarkably improved by the development of the novel, specific drugs directed towards calcitonin-gene related peptide (CGRP) signalling, 40% patients, also undergoing anti-CGRP therapy, are still difficult-to-treat. The potential role of environmental factors and epigenetic modifications in the pathogenesis of migraine and in the responsiveness to treatments still remains poorly investigated. Moreover, the expression of a wide panel of serum microRNAs was recently related to frequency and features of migraine attacks. Thus, the aim of the present study is to analyze the possible epigenetic mechanisms at the root of differences in migraine features and response to treatments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eligibility criteria, search strategy and information sources are established a priori. PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science were inspected for studies published from database inception to the date of last search on October 2nd, 2025.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A few studies so far support the role of DNA methylation in migraine chronification, indicating that these stable but reversible epigenetic modifications may influence the process of progression and transformation from episodic to chronic migraine. Altered DNA methylation sites were linked to genes involved in synaptic plasticity and estrogen receptor signaling. Up-regulation of circulating miRNAs was reduced following treatment with gepants. Within this complex figure, the role of the transient receptor potential (TRP) vanilloid 1 (TRPV1) in the trigeminal ganglia deserves deep investigation, including the prediction of response to first-line therapies such as triptans. Likewise, TRP ankyrin 1 (TRPA1) expression is subjected to pain-induced epigenetic modifications. DNA methylation and the modulation of histone deacetylase activity are implicated in the mechanisms of action of currently used preventative drugs, such as valproic acid and topiramate, and could serve as biomarkers of drug response. Finally, the role of miRNAs as potential biomarker for predicting the response to novel monoclonal antibodies, such as erenumab, has emerged in recent studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The role of epigenetic modifications of genes involved in the CGRP pathway, synaptic plasticity and TRPV1, TRPA1 and estrogen receptor signaling in migraine is emerging. Therefore, a deeper understanding of the impact of epigenetics in migraine pathophysiology and neuropharmacology is needed to revert chronification and personalize medicine in the field of migraine, improving efficacy and safety of treatments and widening the th","PeriodicalId":16013,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Headache and Pain","volume":" ","pages":"20"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12817528/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145678058","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-05DOI: 10.1186/s10194-025-02241-7
Hong Ye, Yajing Huang, Cheng Wang, Jiancheng Jin, Chaoya Jiang, Junjie Fang, Qiuhan Xu
Background: Migraine is a common, disabling neurological disorder. Genome-wide association studies have mapped numerous migraine risk loci, but the causal genes and their cell-type context remain unclear. Prior work linked migraine GWAS to bulk brain eQTLs; however, tissue-average signals obscure cell-specific regulation.
Methods: We extended these findings to single-cell resolution. Cis-eQTL instruments from 183 human donors across eight brain cell types were filtered by genome-wide significance, LD pruning, and instrument strength, yielding 1,746 independent eGenes. Two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) tested effects on migraine risk in FinnGen R12 (discovery) with replication in UK Biobank (GCST90473326). To control for multiple testing, we applied within-cell-type Bonferroni correction and global false discovery rate (FDR) adjustment. Bayesian colocalization was performed in both discovery and replication cohorts to evaluate shared causal variants. We also performed a phenome-wide association screen (PheWAS) and profiled regional brain RNA.
Results: Eleven eGenes were significant in FinnGen. Protective associations were observed for BTBD16 in excitatory and inhibitory neurons, RRP15 in excitatory neurons, CCDC146 and GSTM3 in oligodendrocytes, and PDE4B in microglia. Risk-increasing associations were found for GSTM2 (excitatory neurons), RIMS1 and DPH1 (astrocytes), AADAC (microglia), and RBM20 (endothelium). Replication supported signals for inhibitory-neuronal BTBD16 and astrocytic RIMS1. Colocalization analyses indicated shared causal variants at both loci in the discovery cohort (PP.H4 > 0.80). PheWAS showed no genome-wide liabilities for either gene. Regional expression suggested white-matter enrichment for BTBD16 and a cerebellar peak for RIMS1.
Conclusions: Cell-type-specific MR sharpens migraine mechanisms beyond bulk tissue and prioritizes inhibitory-neuronal BTBD16 (protective) and astrocytic RIMS1 (risk-increasing) for mechanistic validation and therapeutic exploration.
{"title":"Mapping the brain cell-specific regulatory architecture of migraine: a single-cell causal framework nominating inhibitory-neuronal BTBD16 and astrocytic RIMS1 as therapeutic targets.","authors":"Hong Ye, Yajing Huang, Cheng Wang, Jiancheng Jin, Chaoya Jiang, Junjie Fang, Qiuhan Xu","doi":"10.1186/s10194-025-02241-7","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s10194-025-02241-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Migraine is a common, disabling neurological disorder. Genome-wide association studies have mapped numerous migraine risk loci, but the causal genes and their cell-type context remain unclear. Prior work linked migraine GWAS to bulk brain eQTLs; however, tissue-average signals obscure cell-specific regulation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We extended these findings to single-cell resolution. Cis-eQTL instruments from 183 human donors across eight brain cell types were filtered by genome-wide significance, LD pruning, and instrument strength, yielding 1,746 independent eGenes. Two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) tested effects on migraine risk in FinnGen R12 (discovery) with replication in UK Biobank (GCST90473326). To control for multiple testing, we applied within-cell-type Bonferroni correction and global false discovery rate (FDR) adjustment. Bayesian colocalization was performed in both discovery and replication cohorts to evaluate shared causal variants. We also performed a phenome-wide association screen (PheWAS) and profiled regional brain RNA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eleven eGenes were significant in FinnGen. Protective associations were observed for BTBD16 in excitatory and inhibitory neurons, RRP15 in excitatory neurons, CCDC146 and GSTM3 in oligodendrocytes, and PDE4B in microglia. Risk-increasing associations were found for GSTM2 (excitatory neurons), RIMS1 and DPH1 (astrocytes), AADAC (microglia), and RBM20 (endothelium). Replication supported signals for inhibitory-neuronal BTBD16 and astrocytic RIMS1. Colocalization analyses indicated shared causal variants at both loci in the discovery cohort (PP.H4 > 0.80). PheWAS showed no genome-wide liabilities for either gene. Regional expression suggested white-matter enrichment for BTBD16 and a cerebellar peak for RIMS1.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Cell-type-specific MR sharpens migraine mechanisms beyond bulk tissue and prioritizes inhibitory-neuronal BTBD16 (protective) and astrocytic RIMS1 (risk-increasing) for mechanistic validation and therapeutic exploration.</p>","PeriodicalId":16013,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Headache and Pain","volume":" ","pages":"14"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12797516/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145678001","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-04DOI: 10.1186/s10194-025-02140-x
E K Van Obberghen, R Fabre, M Lanteri-Minet
Background: Suicide is considered as common in patients with cluster headache (CH) and is defined as 'suicidal headache'. However, the exact level of suicidality is not known and is intuitively assumed to be correlated with the CH severity.
Methods: This work is a systematic review of data accessible through PubMed and published up to July 25, focusing on the suicidality of CH according to the rates of suicidal ideation and suicide attempts. This meta-analysis was carried out with all selected studies then by considering studies with specialized recruitment and studies with non-specialized recruitment. A qualitative analysis was performed to identify determinants of CH suicidality.
Results: Among the 53 publications identified, 12 were selected corresponding to 10 studies. These selected studies included a total of 34180 subjects (range 75-24131). Eight were performed in a specialized field (headache tertiary center, neurology clinic or via CH patients' association) and 2 in a non-specialized field (via heath registry). The overall rate of suicidal ideation in CH was estimated at 8.0% (95%CI [7.7; 8.3] and overall rate of suicide attempts in CH was estimated at 1.2% (95%CI [1.1; 1.3]). In a non-specialized field, these rates were estimated at 5.2% (95%CI [4.9; 5.4]) and 1.1% (95%CI [1.0; 1.2]) respectively. In specialized field, these rates were estimated at 44.6% (95%CI [42.7; 46.6]) and 5.1% (95%CI [3.9; 6.7]) respectively. The qualitative analysis showed that few determinants have been considered but it appears that the risk is greater during CH attacks, and it involves psychological determinants such as demoralization.
Conclusion: The overall suicidal risk in CH does not appear to be higher than that of the general population, but there is a suicidal risk increase among CH patients followed up in specialized field. This higher risk is indeed probably related to the severity of CH in terms of pain, but it is also probably related to other factors such as impulsive aggressiveness during CH attacks and psychological factors such as demoralization.
Registration: The systematic review protocol was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) on 07/22/2025 (number: CRD420251110095).
{"title":"Cluster headache suicidality: a systematic review with a meta-analysis.","authors":"E K Van Obberghen, R Fabre, M Lanteri-Minet","doi":"10.1186/s10194-025-02140-x","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s10194-025-02140-x","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Suicide is considered as common in patients with cluster headache (CH) and is defined as 'suicidal headache'. However, the exact level of suicidality is not known and is intuitively assumed to be correlated with the CH severity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This work is a systematic review of data accessible through PubMed and published up to July 25, focusing on the suicidality of CH according to the rates of suicidal ideation and suicide attempts. This meta-analysis was carried out with all selected studies then by considering studies with specialized recruitment and studies with non-specialized recruitment. A qualitative analysis was performed to identify determinants of CH suicidality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 53 publications identified, 12 were selected corresponding to 10 studies. These selected studies included a total of 34180 subjects (range 75-24131). Eight were performed in a specialized field (headache tertiary center, neurology clinic or via CH patients' association) and 2 in a non-specialized field (via heath registry). The overall rate of suicidal ideation in CH was estimated at 8.0% (95%CI [7.7; 8.3] and overall rate of suicide attempts in CH was estimated at 1.2% (95%CI [1.1; 1.3]). In a non-specialized field, these rates were estimated at 5.2% (95%CI [4.9; 5.4]) and 1.1% (95%CI [1.0; 1.2]) respectively. In specialized field, these rates were estimated at 44.6% (95%CI [42.7; 46.6]) and 5.1% (95%CI [3.9; 6.7]) respectively. The qualitative analysis showed that few determinants have been considered but it appears that the risk is greater during CH attacks, and it involves psychological determinants such as demoralization.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The overall suicidal risk in CH does not appear to be higher than that of the general population, but there is a suicidal risk increase among CH patients followed up in specialized field. This higher risk is indeed probably related to the severity of CH in terms of pain, but it is also probably related to other factors such as impulsive aggressiveness during CH attacks and psychological factors such as demoralization.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>The systematic review protocol was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) on 07/22/2025 (number: CRD420251110095).</p>","PeriodicalId":16013,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Headache and Pain","volume":"26 1","pages":"281"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12676835/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145677871","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: The Global Campaign against Headache is undertaking a worldwide programme of cross-sectional schools-based studies of headache prevalence and attributed burden among children (6-11 years) and adolescents (12-17). The purpose is to expand the still sparse knowledge of headache among these age groups, using a data-acquisition technique that cluster-samples the world. This survey in Georgia was the fourth in the European Region, following similar studies in Turkey, Austria and Lithuania, and others in African, Eastern Mediterranean, South-East Asia and Western Pacific Regions.
Methods: We used the Global Campaign's standardized protocol, selecting schools representative of the country. The child and adolescent versions of the structured HARDSHIP questionnaire, translated into Georgian language, were completed by pupils under supervision in class. Headache diagnoses followed ICHD-3, with the exception of undifferentiated headache (UdH), which we defined initially as mild and subsequently as mild-to-moderate headache lasting < 1 h. Enquiry timeframes were 1 year, 4 weeks and 1 day (headache yesterday [HY]).
Results: Of 2,790 participants, two thirds (68.5%) reported headache in the preceding year (age- and gender-adjusted 1-year prevalence: 66.3%). HY was reported by 20.4%, a proportion that might be expected to have headache on any day. Headache on ≥ 15 days/month (H15+) was common (4.1%), with probable medication-overuse headache (pMOH) accounting for 0.5% (0.2% among children, 0.7% among adolescents; p = 0.06). UdH took diagnostic precedence over migraine and tension-type headache (TTH), so all other estimates were influenced by the definition of UdH. By the conventional (initial) definition, 1-year prevalence of UdH was 18.2%; by the modified definition, it was 30.2%. Estimates for migraine and TTH, 29.1% and 13.1% respectively with UdH defined conventionally, were reduced to 22.2% and 9.5% with the modified definition.
Conclusions: Headache is very common among children and adolescents in Georgia. The findings raise particular concern about the prevalence of H15 + in young people, with a strong trend of increasing pMOH with age. They also highlight the diagnostic uncertainties inherent in epidemiological studies in these age groups. With the definition of UdH a dominating issue, the findings support the view that it needs to be modified, without offering a definitive solution.
{"title":"The prevalence of headache disorders among children and adolescents in Georgia: a cross-sectional schools-based study.","authors":"Nana Nino Tatishvili, Zaza Katsarava, Teona Shatirishvili, Tamar Kipiani, Tinatin Giuashvili, Mariam Lomsianidze, Aleksandre Kotetishvili, Anano Kvernadze, Irakli Tugushi, Salome Maghlakelidze, Vera Nemsadze, Ana Bedoshvili, Tamar Bitskinashvili, Giorgi Sakvarelidze, Tayyar Şaşmaz, Deniz Erdal, Andreas Kattem Husøy, Derya Uludüz, Timothy J Steiner","doi":"10.1186/s10194-025-02154-5","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s10194-025-02154-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Global Campaign against Headache is undertaking a worldwide programme of cross-sectional schools-based studies of headache prevalence and attributed burden among children (6-11 years) and adolescents (12-17). The purpose is to expand the still sparse knowledge of headache among these age groups, using a data-acquisition technique that cluster-samples the world. This survey in Georgia was the fourth in the European Region, following similar studies in Turkey, Austria and Lithuania, and others in African, Eastern Mediterranean, South-East Asia and Western Pacific Regions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used the Global Campaign's standardized protocol, selecting schools representative of the country. The child and adolescent versions of the structured HARDSHIP questionnaire, translated into Georgian language, were completed by pupils under supervision in class. Headache diagnoses followed ICHD-3, with the exception of undifferentiated headache (UdH), which we defined initially as mild and subsequently as mild-to-moderate headache lasting < 1 h. Enquiry timeframes were 1 year, 4 weeks and 1 day (headache yesterday [HY]).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 2,790 participants, two thirds (68.5%) reported headache in the preceding year (age- and gender-adjusted 1-year prevalence: 66.3%). HY was reported by 20.4%, a proportion that might be expected to have headache on any day. Headache on ≥ 15 days/month (H15+) was common (4.1%), with probable medication-overuse headache (pMOH) accounting for 0.5% (0.2% among children, 0.7% among adolescents; p = 0.06). UdH took diagnostic precedence over migraine and tension-type headache (TTH), so all other estimates were influenced by the definition of UdH. By the conventional (initial) definition, 1-year prevalence of UdH was 18.2%; by the modified definition, it was 30.2%. Estimates for migraine and TTH, 29.1% and 13.1% respectively with UdH defined conventionally, were reduced to 22.2% and 9.5% with the modified definition.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Headache is very common among children and adolescents in Georgia. The findings raise particular concern about the prevalence of H15 + in young people, with a strong trend of increasing pMOH with age. They also highlight the diagnostic uncertainties inherent in epidemiological studies in these age groups. With the definition of UdH a dominating issue, the findings support the view that it needs to be modified, without offering a definitive solution.</p>","PeriodicalId":16013,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Headache and Pain","volume":"26 1","pages":"282"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12676893/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145677960","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The burden attributable to headache disorders among children and adolescents in Mongolia: estimates from a national cross-sectional schools-based study.","authors":"Otgonbayar Luvsannorov, Tsengunmaa Anisbayar, Munkhzul Davaasuren, Otgonzaya Baatar, Khaliunaa Batmagnai, Khulan Tumurbaatar, Sarantuya Enkhbaatar, Andreas Kattem Husøy, Derya Uluduz, Tayyar Şaşmaz, Elif Tuğçe Solmaz, Timothy J Steiner","doi":"10.1186/s10194-025-02202-0","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s10194-025-02202-0","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":16013,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Headache and Pain","volume":"26 1","pages":"283"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12676795/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145677995","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-03DOI: 10.1186/s10194-025-02177-y
Berkay Alpay, Doga Vuralli, Hayrunnisa Bolay
{"title":"Is canonical SD a clinically relevant model of migraine? Argument con.","authors":"Berkay Alpay, Doga Vuralli, Hayrunnisa Bolay","doi":"10.1186/s10194-025-02177-y","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s10194-025-02177-y","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":16013,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Headache and Pain","volume":"26 1","pages":"279"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12673730/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145678009","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}