首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery最新文献

英文 中文
AAOMS Author Disclosure forms 作者披露表
IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/S0278-2391(25)00886-9
{"title":"AAOMS Author Disclosure forms","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/S0278-2391(25)00886-9","DOIUrl":"10.1016/S0278-2391(25)00886-9","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":16612,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":"84 1","pages":"Pages A5-A7"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145860218","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
January 2026 AAOMS News and Announcements 2026年1月AAOMS新闻和公告
IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2025.10.005
{"title":"January 2026 AAOMS News and Announcements","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.joms.2025.10.005","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.joms.2025.10.005","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":16612,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":"84 1","pages":"Pages 141-144"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145860222","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Federal Student Loan Changes Uniquely Impact 6-Year Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Residents 联邦学生贷款变化对口腔颌面外科6年制住院医师的独特影响
IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2025.07.016
Clark D. Morgan , Samat T. Borbiev , Zachary S. Peacock DMD, MD
{"title":"Federal Student Loan Changes Uniquely Impact 6-Year Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Residents","authors":"Clark D. Morgan , Samat T. Borbiev , Zachary S. Peacock DMD, MD","doi":"10.1016/j.joms.2025.07.016","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.joms.2025.07.016","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":16612,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":"84 1","pages":"Pages 9-10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145860742","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Patterns of Recurrence and Oncologic Outcomes After Maxillectomy: Does Reconstructive Modality Matter? 上颌切除术后的复发模式和肿瘤预后:重建方式重要吗?
IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2025.09.021
Cameron Lee DMD, MD , Salim Abdul Wasay DDS , Glyndwr Jenkins BChD, MBBS , Kelly Moyer MD , Kyle Hatten MD , Jeffrey S. Wolf MD , Rodney Taylor MD, MSPH , Joshua Lubek DDS, MD , Donita Dyalram DDS, MD

Background

Reconstruction following maxillectomy for oral cavity malignancies is essential for restoring form and function. Obturator reconstruction facilitates direct visualization of the surgical bed, whereas flap-based reconstructions may obscure sites of potential recurrence. This has raised concern that reconstructive modality could influence the timeliness of recurrence detection, and subsequently, oncologic outcomes.

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to measure the association between reconstructive modality and time to detection of local recurrence and survival outcomes.

Study design, setting sample

This was a retrospective cohort study of all patients undergoing maxillectomy for an oral cavity malignancy at the University of Maryland between 2016 and 2024. Patients previously undergoing maxillectomy were excluded.

Predictor variable

The predictor was reconstructive modality: obturator versus native tissue reconstruction (local, regional, or free flap).

Main outcome variable

The primary outcome was local disease-free survival. Secondary outcomes included overall survival, method of recurrence detection (clinical vs radiographic), and resectability of recurrence.

Covariates

Covariates were categorized into demographic (age, sex), perioperative (Brown classification), and pathologic (margin status, tumor stage).

Analyses

Descriptive statistics were computed for study variables. Associations between study covariates and time to local recurrence were evaluated using bivariate Cox proportional hazards models.

Results

The cohort was composed of 154 subjects with a mean age of 66.5 ± 14.9 years and 90 were male (58.4%). Fifty subjects (32.5%) underwent obturator reconstruction and 104 (67.5%) underwent reconstruction with native tissue (75% free flap). Reconstructive modality was not associated with local disease-free survival (P = .9), method of detection (P = .4), or overall survival (P = .3). Local recurrence occurred in 41 subjects (26.6%), with 14 (34.1%) in the obturator group compared to 27 (65.9%) in native tissue (P = .7). The median time to local recurrence was 7.7 months (interquartile range 26.2 months). Most recurrences (75.6%) were detected clinically. Subgroup analysis of Brown 2 defects confirmed the similar findings.

Conclusions and relevance

Reconstructive modality was not associated with delayed detection of local recurrence or worse survival outcomes following maxillectomy for oral cavity malignancies.
背景:口腔恶性肿瘤上颌切除术后重建是恢复口腔形态和功能的必要条件。闭孔重建有助于手术床的直接可视化,而皮瓣重建可能会模糊潜在复发的部位。这引起了人们的关注,即重建方式可能会影响复发检测的及时性,并随后影响肿瘤预后。目的:本研究的目的是测量重建方式与局部复发检测时间和生存结果之间的关系。研究设计,设定样本:这是一项回顾性队列研究,纳入了2016年至2024年间马里兰大学所有因口腔恶性肿瘤接受上颌切除术的患者。既往行上颌切除术的患者排除在外。预测变量:预测因子是重建方式:闭孔与原生组织重建(局部、区域或自由皮瓣)。主要结局变量:主要结局为局部无病生存。次要结果包括总生存、复发检测方法(临床与放射学)和复发可切除性。协变量:协变量分为人口学(年龄、性别)、围手术期(Brown分类)和病理(边缘状态、肿瘤分期)。分析:对研究变量进行描述性统计。使用双变量Cox比例风险模型评估研究协变量与局部复发时间之间的关联。结果:研究对象154人,平均年龄66.5±14.9岁,其中男性90人(58.4%)。50例(32.5%)患者行闭孔重建,104例(67.5%)患者行原生组织重建(75%为游离皮瓣)。重建方式与局部无病生存(P = .9)、检测方法(P = .4)或总生存(P = .3)无关。局部复发41例(26.6%),其中闭孔组14例(34.1%),原生组织27例(65.9%)(P = .7)。局部复发的中位时间为7.7个月(四分位数间距26.2个月)。大多数复发(75.6%)是临床发现的。Brown 2缺陷的亚组分析证实了类似的发现。结论和相关性:口腔恶性肿瘤上颌切除术后,重建方式与延迟发现局部复发或更差的生存结果无关。
{"title":"Patterns of Recurrence and Oncologic Outcomes After Maxillectomy: Does Reconstructive Modality Matter?","authors":"Cameron Lee DMD, MD ,&nbsp;Salim Abdul Wasay DDS ,&nbsp;Glyndwr Jenkins BChD, MBBS ,&nbsp;Kelly Moyer MD ,&nbsp;Kyle Hatten MD ,&nbsp;Jeffrey S. Wolf MD ,&nbsp;Rodney Taylor MD, MSPH ,&nbsp;Joshua Lubek DDS, MD ,&nbsp;Donita Dyalram DDS, MD","doi":"10.1016/j.joms.2025.09.021","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.joms.2025.09.021","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Reconstruction following maxillectomy for oral cavity malignancies is essential for restoring form and function. Obturator reconstruction facilitates direct visualization of the surgical bed, whereas flap-based reconstructions may obscure sites of potential recurrence. This has raised concern that reconstructive modality could influence the timeliness of recurrence detection, and subsequently, oncologic outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>The purpose of this study was to measure the association between reconstructive modality and time to detection of local recurrence and survival outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Study design, setting sample</h3><div>This was a retrospective cohort study of all patients undergoing maxillectomy for an oral cavity malignancy at the University of Maryland between 2016 and 2024. Patients previously undergoing maxillectomy were excluded.</div></div><div><h3>Predictor variable</h3><div>The predictor was reconstructive modality: obturator versus native tissue reconstruction (local, regional, or free flap).</div></div><div><h3>Main outcome variable</h3><div>The primary outcome was local disease-free survival. Secondary outcomes included overall survival, method of recurrence detection (clinical vs radiographic), and resectability of recurrence.</div></div><div><h3>Covariates</h3><div>Covariates were categorized into demographic (age, sex), perioperative (Brown classification), and pathologic (margin status, tumor stage).</div></div><div><h3>Analyses</h3><div>Descriptive statistics were computed for study variables. Associations between study covariates and time to local recurrence were evaluated using bivariate Cox proportional hazards models.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The cohort was composed of 154 subjects with a mean age of 66.5 ± 14.9 years and 90 were male (58.4%). Fifty subjects (32.5%) underwent obturator reconstruction and 104 (67.5%) underwent reconstruction with native tissue (75% free flap). Reconstructive modality was not associated with local disease-free survival (<em>P</em> = .9), method of detection (<em>P</em> = .4), or overall survival (<em>P</em> = .3). Local recurrence occurred in 41 subjects (26.6%), with 14 (34.1%) in the obturator group compared to 27 (65.9%) in native tissue (<em>P</em> = .7). The median time to local recurrence was 7.7 months (interquartile range 26.2 months). Most recurrences (75.6%) were detected clinically. Subgroup analysis of Brown 2 defects confirmed the similar findings.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions and relevance</h3><div>Reconstructive modality was not associated with delayed detection of local recurrence or worse survival outcomes following maxillectomy for oral cavity malignancies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16612,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":"84 1","pages":"Pages 115-126"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145459092","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Does Dexmedetomidine Affect Opioid Consumption Following Orthognathic Surgery? 右美托咪定是否影响正颌手术后阿片类药物的消耗?
IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2025.08.015
Allen F. Champion DDS , Jung-me Lee BS , Daniel Taub DDS, MD , Yu Jin Lee DMD

Background

Despite its purported analgesic effects, controversy exists regarding dexmedetomidine's efficacy as an opioid-sparing anesthetic adjunct.

Purpose

The purpose of this study is to measure the association between dexmedetomidine (DEX) administration during orthognathic surgery and postoperative opioid consumption.

Study design, sample, and setting

A single-blind randomized prospective cohort study was implemented. Patients consenting for orthognathic surgery at Thomas Jefferson University from January 2022 to October 2024 were screened. American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I to III individuals aged ≥14 years were included. Exclusion criteria were revision surgery, recreational drug use, opioid prescription within 2 years, and chronic pain.

Predictor variable

The predictor variable was anesthetic adjunct. Subjects were randomized to receive DEX or no DEX (control).

Main outcome variables

The primary outcome variable was 24-hour postoperative opioid consumption, which was calculated as morphine milligram equivalents (MME). Postoperative pain was assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS) at 6 hours and upon patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) discontinuation at 7:00 am the following day (VASPCA). The ratio of PCA that attempts to bolus deliveries was calculated.

Covariates

Covariates included age, sex, body mass index (BMI), and operative duration.

Analyses

Descriptive statistics were calculated. Shapiro-Wilk test was used to assess sample normality. Relationships between continuous variables and DEX were studied using t test or Wilcoxon rank-sum test; χ2 test was used for the categorical covariate. Significance was P < .05.

Results

Of 66 enrollees, 50 (75.8%) subjects completed the trial (25 DEX, 25 no DEX). The mean (SD) ages for the no DEX and DEX group cohorts were 35.9 (13.5) and 41.3 (13.6), respectively (P = .2). There were no statistically significant differences in the distribution of covariates between the 2 study groups. Median (interquartile range (IQR)) morphine milligram equivalents consumption was 16.4 (15.4) and 14.8 (12.4) for no DEX and DEX groups, respectively (P = .9). No difference in pain scores was observed at 6 hours (P = .1). Median (interquartile range) VASPCA scores were 5(1) and 4(2) for no DEX and DEX cohorts, respectively (P < .01). Median ratios of PCA that attempts to boluses administered (1.23) were identical between cohorts (P = .9).

Conclusions and relevance

The findings suggest that opioid consumption following orthognathic surgery was not associated with dexmedetomidine administration.
背景:尽管右美托咪定具有镇痛作用,但其作为一种节省阿片类药物的麻醉辅助剂的有效性仍存在争议。目的:本研究的目的是测量正颌手术期间右美托咪定(DEX)给药与术后阿片类药物消耗之间的关系。研究设计、样本和设置:采用单盲随机前瞻性队列研究。从2022年1月到2024年10月,在托马斯·杰斐逊大学同意进行正颌手术的患者进行了筛选。年龄≥14岁的美国麻醉医师协会(American Society of anesthesologists) I至III级个体纳入研究。排除标准为翻修手术、娱乐性药物使用、2年内阿片类药物处方和慢性疼痛。预测变量:预测变量为麻醉辅助。受试者随机分为服用或不服用DEX(对照组)。主要结局变量:主要结局变量为术后24小时阿片类药物消耗,以吗啡毫克当量(MME)计算。术后6小时用视觉模拟评分(VAS)评估疼痛,第二天早上7点停用患者自控镇痛(PCA) (VASPCA)。计算了PCA尝试加丸分娩的比例。协变量:协变量包括年龄、性别、体重指数(BMI)和手术时间。分析:进行描述性统计。采用Shapiro-Wilk检验评估样本正态性。采用t检验或Wilcoxon秩和检验研究连续变量与DEX的关系;分类协变量采用χ2检验。P < 0.05。结果:在66名入组者中,50名(75.8%)受试者完成了试验(25名DEX, 25名未使用DEX)。无DEX组和DEX组的平均(SD)年龄分别为35.9岁(13.5岁)和41.3岁(13.6岁)(P = 0.2)。两组间协变量分布无统计学差异。无DEX组和DEX组吗啡毫克当量的中位数(四分位间距(IQR))分别为16.4(15.4)和14.8 (12.4)(P = .9)。6小时时疼痛评分无差异(P = 0.1)。无DEX组和DEX组VASPCA评分中位数(四分位数范围)分别为5(1)和4(2),差异有统计学意义(P < 0.01)。PCA的中位数比(1.23)在队列之间是相同的(P = .9)。结论和相关性:研究结果表明,正颌手术后阿片类药物的使用与右美托咪定的使用无关。
{"title":"Does Dexmedetomidine Affect Opioid Consumption Following Orthognathic Surgery?","authors":"Allen F. Champion DDS ,&nbsp;Jung-me Lee BS ,&nbsp;Daniel Taub DDS, MD ,&nbsp;Yu Jin Lee DMD","doi":"10.1016/j.joms.2025.08.015","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.joms.2025.08.015","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Despite its purported analgesic effects, controversy exists regarding dexmedetomidine's efficacy as an opioid-sparing anesthetic adjunct.</div></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>The purpose of this study is to measure the association between dexmedetomidine (DEX) administration during orthognathic surgery and postoperative opioid consumption.</div></div><div><h3>Study design, sample, and setting</h3><div>A single-blind randomized prospective cohort study was implemented. Patients consenting for orthognathic surgery at Thomas Jefferson University from January 2022 to October 2024 were screened. American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I to III individuals aged ≥14 years were included. Exclusion criteria were revision surgery, recreational drug use, opioid prescription within 2 years, and chronic pain.</div></div><div><h3>Predictor variable</h3><div>The predictor variable was anesthetic adjunct. Subjects were randomized to receive DEX or no DEX (control).</div></div><div><h3>Main outcome variables</h3><div>The primary outcome variable was 24-hour postoperative opioid consumption, which was calculated as morphine milligram equivalents (MME). Postoperative pain was assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS) at 6 hours and upon patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) discontinuation at 7:00 <span>am</span> the following day (VASPCA). The ratio of PCA that attempts to bolus deliveries was calculated.</div></div><div><h3>Covariates</h3><div>Covariates included age, sex, body mass index (BMI), and operative duration.</div></div><div><h3>Analyses</h3><div>Descriptive statistics were calculated. Shapiro-Wilk test was used to assess sample normality. Relationships between continuous variables and DEX were studied using <em>t</em> test or Wilcoxon rank-sum test; χ<sup>2</sup> test was used for the categorical covariate. Significance was <em>P</em> &lt; .05.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 66 enrollees, 50 (75.8%) subjects completed the trial (25 DEX, 25 no DEX). The mean (SD) ages for the no DEX and DEX group cohorts were 35.9 (13.5) and 41.3 (13.6), respectively (<em>P</em> = .2). There were no statistically significant differences in the distribution of covariates between the 2 study groups. Median (interquartile range (IQR)) morphine milligram equivalents consumption was 16.4 (15.4) and 14.8 (12.4) for no DEX and DEX groups, respectively (<em>P</em> = .9). No difference in pain scores was observed at 6 hours (<em>P</em> = .1). Median (interquartile range) VASPCA scores were 5(1) and 4(2) for no DEX and DEX cohorts, respectively (<em>P</em> &lt; .01). Median ratios of PCA that attempts to boluses administered (1.23) were identical between cohorts (<em>P</em> = .9).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions and relevance</h3><div>The findings suggest that opioid consumption following orthognathic surgery was not associated with dexmedetomidine administration.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16612,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":"84 1","pages":"Pages 13-17"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145124889","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Rates and Determinants of Prosthodontic Rehabilitation After Segmental Jaw Surgery 颌骨节段性手术后修复康复的比率和决定因素。
IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2025.09.008
Amal Idrissi Janati DMD, MSc, PhD , Ameena Nizar Beema BDS, MSc , Jordan Gigliotti DMD, MD, CM , Nicholas Makhoul DMD, MD , Michel El-Hakim DMD, MD, MSc , Nour Karra DMD

Background

Management of maxillofacial pathologies often requires ablative surgeries of the jaw which may include the tooth-bearing segment resulting in loss of oral function. Advances in maxillomandibular reconstruction with vascularized free flaps (VFFs) and dental implants have enabled prosthodontic rehabilitation (PR) in most patients. However, the impact of these advancements on rates and barriers of PR remains unclear.

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to estimate the rate of PR and identify risk factors associated with failure to achieve PR.

Study Design, Setting, Sample

This 7-year retrospective cohort study was conducted at the Montreal General Hospital and included patients aged ≥15 years who underwent vascularized free flap reconstruction following jaw segmental resection between 2015 and 2021.

Predictor Variable

Predictor variables included age, sex, smoking, clinical diagnosis, adjuvant radiotherapy, flap type, and anterior tooth loss.

Main Outcome Variable(s)

The primary outcome is time to PR and secondary outcomes were PR status (not performed vs performed) and PR type (conventional vs implant-supported) respectively.

Covariates

NA.

Analyses

Descriptive statistics, comparison tests, Kaplan–Meier analysis, and univariate and multivariate Cox and logistic regression analyses were conducted (P < .05).

Results

The study included 184 subjects with a mean age of 58 years (SD = 17), and 52% (n = 95) were men. The median follow-up was 20 months (interquartile range = 32). Malignancy was the most common diagnosis leading to surgery (n = 106; 58%), followed by benign tumors (n = 46; 25%). Cumulative proportion of PR was 41% (n = 76), including 19.5% (n = 36) of implant-supported prostheses. Median time to start PR was 44 months (95% CI: 30 to 78) and was significantly delayed in men, ever smokers, cancer patients, and those who received radiotherapy. In multivariate analysis, radiotherapy was the main predictor of failure to receive PR overall (P = .014) and implant-supported PR specifically (P = .025).

Conclusion and Relevance

Many patients with dental morbidity after segmental jaw surgery, especially cancer patients requiring radiotherapy, did not receive PR, and even fewer received implant-supported prostheses, highlighting the need for preradiotherapy solutions.
背景:颌面部疾病的治疗通常需要对颌骨进行消融手术,其中可能包括牙齿承载段,导致口腔功能丧失。利用带血管的游离皮瓣(VFFs)和牙种植体重建上颌下颌骨的进展使大多数患者的修复康复(PR)成为可能。然而,这些进步对PR费率和障碍的影响仍不清楚。目的:本研究的目的是估计PR率,并确定与PR失败相关的危险因素。研究设计、环境、样本:这项为期7年的回顾性队列研究在蒙特利尔总医院进行,包括年龄≥15岁的患者,他们在2015年至2021年期间接受了下颌节段切除术后血管化游离腓骨(VFF)重建。预测变量:预测变量包括年龄、性别、吸烟、临床诊断、辅助放疗、皮瓣类型、前牙脱落。主要结果变量:主要结果是到PR的时间,次要结果分别是PR状态(未执行vs已执行)和PR类型(常规vs种植支持)。共:NA。分析:采用描述性统计、比较检验、Kaplan-Meier分析、单因素和多因素Cox和logistic回归分析(P < 0.05)。结果:本研究纳入184例,平均年龄58岁(SD = 17),其中52% (n = 95)为男性。中位随访时间为20个月(四分位数间距= 32)。恶性肿瘤是最常见的导致手术的诊断(n = 106, 58%),其次是良性肿瘤(n = 46, 25%)。PR累积比例为41% (n = 76),其中种植体支持假体占19.5% (n = 36)。开始PR的中位时间为44个月(95% CI: 30 - 78),在男性、曾经吸烟的患者、癌症患者和接受放疗的患者中,PR的开始时间明显延迟。在多因素分析中,放疗是总体PR失败(P = 0.014)和种植体支持PR失败(P = 0.025)的主要预测因素。结论及意义:许多颌骨节段性手术后出现牙病的患者,特别是需要放疗的癌症患者,没有接受PR治疗,更少的患者接受了种植体支持的假体,突出了放疗前解决方案的必要性。
{"title":"Rates and Determinants of Prosthodontic Rehabilitation After Segmental Jaw Surgery","authors":"Amal Idrissi Janati DMD, MSc, PhD ,&nbsp;Ameena Nizar Beema BDS, MSc ,&nbsp;Jordan Gigliotti DMD, MD, CM ,&nbsp;Nicholas Makhoul DMD, MD ,&nbsp;Michel El-Hakim DMD, MD, MSc ,&nbsp;Nour Karra DMD","doi":"10.1016/j.joms.2025.09.008","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.joms.2025.09.008","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Management of maxillofacial pathologies often requires ablative surgeries of the jaw which may include the tooth-bearing segment resulting in loss of oral function. Advances in maxillomandibular reconstruction with vascularized free flaps (VFFs) and dental implants have enabled prosthodontic rehabilitation (PR) in most patients. However, the impact of these advancements on rates and barriers of PR remains unclear.</div></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>The purpose of this study was to estimate the rate of PR and identify risk factors associated with failure to achieve PR.</div></div><div><h3>Study Design, Setting, Sample</h3><div>This 7-year retrospective cohort study was conducted at the Montreal General Hospital and included patients aged ≥15 years who underwent vascularized free flap reconstruction following jaw segmental resection between 2015 and 2021.</div></div><div><h3>Predictor Variable</h3><div>Predictor variables included age, sex, smoking, clinical diagnosis, adjuvant radiotherapy, flap type, and anterior tooth loss.</div></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Variable(s)</h3><div>The primary outcome is time to PR and secondary outcomes were PR status (not performed vs performed) and PR type (conventional vs implant-supported) respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Covariates</h3><div>NA.</div></div><div><h3>Analyses</h3><div>Descriptive statistics, comparison tests, Kaplan–Meier analysis, and univariate and multivariate Cox and logistic regression analyses were conducted (<em>P</em> &lt; .05).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The study included 184 subjects with a mean age of 58 years (SD = 17), and 52% (n = 95) were men. The median follow-up was 20 months (interquartile range = 32). Malignancy was the most common diagnosis leading to surgery (n = 106; 58%), followed by benign tumors (n = 46; 25%). Cumulative proportion of PR was 41% (n = 76), including 19.5% (n = 36) of implant-supported prostheses. Median time to start PR was 44 months (95% CI: 30 to 78) and was significantly delayed in men, ever smokers, cancer patients, and those who received radiotherapy. In multivariate analysis, radiotherapy was the main predictor of failure to receive PR overall (<em>P</em> = .014) and implant-supported PR specifically (<em>P</em> = .025).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion and Relevance</h3><div>Many patients with dental morbidity after segmental jaw surgery, especially cancer patients requiring radiotherapy, did not receive PR, and even fewer received implant-supported prostheses, highlighting the need for preradiotherapy solutions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16612,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":"84 1","pages":"Pages 127-137"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145225818","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Kindred Reference Form: A New Paradigm for Assessing Facial Morphology in Patients With Deformities. 亲属参考表:一种评估畸形患者面部形态的新范式。
IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Pub Date : 2025-12-30 DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2025.12.015
Yasmine Soubra, Rohan Dharia, Daeseung Kim, Jaime Gateno

Normative reference models are essential for assessing facial form, yet existing databases, stratified by ethnicity, age, and sex, have significant limitations, including incompleteness and lack of applicability for mixed-heritage patients. We propose a new paradigm, the Kindred Reference Form, which derives personalized reference morphology from a patient's nondeformed relatives. This framework provides an individualized normative standard overcoming the limitations of population datasets and proposing a new direction for patient-specific surgical planning in facial deformities.

规范的参考模型对于评估面部形态是必不可少的,然而现有的数据库,按种族、年龄和性别分层,有明显的局限性,包括不完整和缺乏对混合遗传患者的适用性。我们提出了一种新的范式,亲属参考表,它从患者的非畸形亲属中衍生出个性化的参考形态。该框架提供了一个个性化的规范标准,克服了人口数据集的局限性,并为面部畸形的患者特异性手术计划提出了新的方向。
{"title":"The Kindred Reference Form: A New Paradigm for Assessing Facial Morphology in Patients With Deformities.","authors":"Yasmine Soubra, Rohan Dharia, Daeseung Kim, Jaime Gateno","doi":"10.1016/j.joms.2025.12.015","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.joms.2025.12.015","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Normative reference models are essential for assessing facial form, yet existing databases, stratified by ethnicity, age, and sex, have significant limitations, including incompleteness and lack of applicability for mixed-heritage patients. We propose a new paradigm, the Kindred Reference Form, which derives personalized reference morphology from a patient's nondeformed relatives. This framework provides an individualized normative standard overcoming the limitations of population datasets and proposing a new direction for patient-specific surgical planning in facial deformities.</p>","PeriodicalId":16612,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145959778","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Factors Associated With Successful Outcomes Following Arthroscopic Discopexy for Symptomatic Disc Displacement. 关节镜下椎间盘脱位治疗成功的相关因素。
IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Pub Date : 2025-12-29 DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2025.12.014
Daniel Jerez-Frederick, Camila Ávila-Oliver, German Laissle, Nicole Miranda, Pamela Timmermann, Daniela Albers

Background: Symptomatic disc displacement (SDD) is a common temporomandibular joint disorder, with arthroscopic discopexy being one of the treatment options that offers the advantages of a minimally invasive approach.

Purpose: The purpose was to evaluate factors associated with favorable outcomes after mattress-loop technique (Yang's technique) for arthroscopic discopexy in subjects with SDD.

Study design, setting, and sample: This prospective cohort study was conducted at a tertiary care center (Clínica Bupa Santiago). Patients presenting between 2022 and 2024 with SDD who required arthroscopic discopexy were enrolled. Exclusion criteria included missing preoperative data or unavailable preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Predictor variable: The predictor variable was a set of heterogenous variables categorized as demographic, perioperative, or imaging.

Main outcome variables: The main outcome variable was therapeutic effect measured using (1) visual analog scale to assess pain and (2) maximal incisal opening (MIO). The secondary outcome was radiographic, measured using disc stability assessed on 6-month MRI based on disc position. All variables were measured at baseline and at 6 months postoperatively.

Covariates: Not applicable.

Analyses: Data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics, a statistical significance was set at P value < .05. Mixed-effects regression models with a random intercept for patient to account for correlation between joints within the same individual were performed for changes in pain, MIO, and disc position stability.

Results: A total of 218 joints from 141 subjects were included. At 6 months, pain decreased from a mean of 5.53 ± 2.42 to 0.81 ± 1.60 (Δ = 4.72, P < .05) and MIO increased from 31.29 ± 9.13 mm to 38.52 ± 4.61 mm (Δ = 7.23 mm, P < .05). MRI follow-up showed disc stability in 120 joints (89.5%). Female sex, younger age, and the presence of clicking were significantly associated with greater improvements in pain and MIO. After adjusting for males experienced significantly less pain reduction (β = -1.56, P = .03), and younger subjects (β = -0.17 mm/year, P = .002) had better pain relief and improved MIO respespectively.

Conclusion (and relevance): The results suggest that mattress-loop technique was associated with reducing pain, increasing MIO, and preserving short-term disc stability at 6 months. Younger age was the strongest predictor of favorable outcomes, supporting early intervention in this population.

背景:症状性椎间盘移位(SDD)是一种常见的颞下颌关节疾病,关节镜下椎间盘移位术是一种具有微创优势的治疗选择。目的:目的是评估床垫环技术(Yang’s技术)对SDD患者进行关节镜下骨折固定术后良好预后的相关因素。研究设计、环境和样本:本前瞻性队列研究在三级保健中心(Clínica Bupa Santiago)进行。纳入了2022年至2024年期间出现SDD并需要关节镜下脱臼的患者。排除标准包括术前资料缺失或无法获得术前磁共振成像(MRI)。预测变量:预测变量是一组异质性变量,分类为人口统计学、围手术期或影像学。主要结局变量:主要结局变量为治疗效果,采用(1)视觉模拟量表评估疼痛,(2)最大切牙开口(MIO)。次要结果是放射学,通过基于椎间盘位置的6个月MRI评估椎间盘稳定性来测量。在基线和术后6个月测量所有变量。协变量:不适用。分析:资料采用描述性统计和推断性统计进行分析,P值< 0.05为统计学显著性。采用混合效应回归模型,对患者进行随机截距,以解释同一个体关节之间的相关性,以了解疼痛、MIO和椎间盘位置稳定性的变化。结果:141例受试者共纳入218个关节。6个月时疼痛由平均5.53±2.42下降至0.81±1.60 (Δ = 4.72, P < 0.05), MIO由平均31.29±9.13 mm上升至38.52±4.61 mm (Δ = 7.23 mm, P < 0.05)。MRI随访显示120个关节(89.5%)椎间盘稳定。女性、更年轻的年龄和咔嗒声的存在与疼痛和MIO的改善显著相关。调整后,男性的疼痛减轻明显减少(β = -1.56, P = .03),年轻的受试者(β = -0.17 mm/年,P = .002)分别有更好的疼痛缓解和改善的MIO。结论(及相关性):结果表明,床垫环技术可减轻疼痛,增加MIO,并在6个月时保持短期椎间盘稳定性。较年轻的年龄是有利结果的最强预测因子,支持对该人群进行早期干预。
{"title":"Factors Associated With Successful Outcomes Following Arthroscopic Discopexy for Symptomatic Disc Displacement.","authors":"Daniel Jerez-Frederick, Camila Ávila-Oliver, German Laissle, Nicole Miranda, Pamela Timmermann, Daniela Albers","doi":"10.1016/j.joms.2025.12.014","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.joms.2025.12.014","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Symptomatic disc displacement (SDD) is a common temporomandibular joint disorder, with arthroscopic discopexy being one of the treatment options that offers the advantages of a minimally invasive approach.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose was to evaluate factors associated with favorable outcomes after mattress-loop technique (Yang's technique) for arthroscopic discopexy in subjects with SDD.</p><p><strong>Study design, setting, and sample: </strong>This prospective cohort study was conducted at a tertiary care center (Clínica Bupa Santiago). Patients presenting between 2022 and 2024 with SDD who required arthroscopic discopexy were enrolled. Exclusion criteria included missing preoperative data or unavailable preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).</p><p><strong>Predictor variable: </strong>The predictor variable was a set of heterogenous variables categorized as demographic, perioperative, or imaging.</p><p><strong>Main outcome variables: </strong>The main outcome variable was therapeutic effect measured using (1) visual analog scale to assess pain and (2) maximal incisal opening (MIO). The secondary outcome was radiographic, measured using disc stability assessed on 6-month MRI based on disc position. All variables were measured at baseline and at 6 months postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Covariates: </strong>Not applicable.</p><p><strong>Analyses: </strong>Data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics, a statistical significance was set at P value < .05. Mixed-effects regression models with a random intercept for patient to account for correlation between joints within the same individual were performed for changes in pain, MIO, and disc position stability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 218 joints from 141 subjects were included. At 6 months, pain decreased from a mean of 5.53 ± 2.42 to 0.81 ± 1.60 (Δ = 4.72, P < .05) and MIO increased from 31.29 ± 9.13 mm to 38.52 ± 4.61 mm (Δ = 7.23 mm, P < .05). MRI follow-up showed disc stability in 120 joints (89.5%). Female sex, younger age, and the presence of clicking were significantly associated with greater improvements in pain and MIO. After adjusting for males experienced significantly less pain reduction (β = -1.56, P = .03), and younger subjects (β = -0.17 mm/year, P = .002) had better pain relief and improved MIO respespectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion (and relevance): </strong>The results suggest that mattress-loop technique was associated with reducing pain, increasing MIO, and preserving short-term disc stability at 6 months. Younger age was the strongest predictor of favorable outcomes, supporting early intervention in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":16612,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145966258","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Artificial Intelligence for the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeon: A Narrative Review. 口腔颌面外科医生的人工智能:叙述性回顾。
IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Pub Date : 2025-12-24 DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2025.12.013
John M Nathan, Jay Shim, Kevin Arce, Kyle S Ettinger

Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) (AI/ML) has grown exponentially over the past several years. However, oral and maxillofacial surgeons have limited education and exposure to AI in the clinical and administrative setting. The purpose of this review is to provide an introduction of core concepts in commonly used AI models while providing relevant context in oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMS). Challenges and potential solutions to development of AI in OMS are also discussed.

Findings: Preliminary studies using AI/ML in OMS have demonstrated high performance in metrics including sensitivity, specificity, Dice coefficient, intersection over union, and residual error.

Conclusions and relevance: Oral and maxillofacial surgeons should have a functional knowledge of AI technologies to guide development, testing, and adoption into OMS. With surgeon guidance, AI/ML has the potential for meaningful application across multiple clinical and administrative domains of OMS.

背景:人工智能(AI)和机器学习(ML) (AI/ML)在过去几年中呈指数级增长。然而,口腔颌面外科医生在临床和管理环境中对人工智能的教育和接触有限。本综述的目的是介绍常用人工智能模型的核心概念,同时提供口腔颌面外科(OMS)的相关背景。讨论了人工智能在OMS中发展面临的挑战和潜在的解决方案。研究结果:在OMS中使用AI/ML的初步研究表明,在灵敏度、特异性、Dice系数、交集大于联合和剩余误差等指标上表现优异。结论及相关性:口腔颌面外科医生应具备人工智能技术的功能知识,以指导人工智能技术的开发、测试和应用。在外科医生的指导下,AI/ML有可能在OMS的多个临床和管理领域得到有意义的应用。
{"title":"Artificial Intelligence for the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeon: A Narrative Review.","authors":"John M Nathan, Jay Shim, Kevin Arce, Kyle S Ettinger","doi":"10.1016/j.joms.2025.12.013","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.joms.2025.12.013","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) (AI/ML) has grown exponentially over the past several years. However, oral and maxillofacial surgeons have limited education and exposure to AI in the clinical and administrative setting. The purpose of this review is to provide an introduction of core concepts in commonly used AI models while providing relevant context in oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMS). Challenges and potential solutions to development of AI in OMS are also discussed.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Preliminary studies using AI/ML in OMS have demonstrated high performance in metrics including sensitivity, specificity, Dice coefficient, intersection over union, and residual error.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>Oral and maxillofacial surgeons should have a functional knowledge of AI technologies to guide development, testing, and adoption into OMS. With surgeon guidance, AI/ML has the potential for meaningful application across multiple clinical and administrative domains of OMS.</p>","PeriodicalId":16612,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145944553","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Does Temporomandibular Joint Disc Displacement Influence Joint Space Dimensions, and Does Sex Play a Role? 颞下颌关节盘移位是否影响关节空间尺寸,性别是否起作用?
IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Pub Date : 2025-12-17 DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2025.12.010
Jin-Beom Kim, Jung-Sub An, Kyung-Hoe Huh, Sug-Joon Ahn

Background: Joint space dimensions influence maxillomandibular relationships by altering condylar position. Although disc displacement (DD) is the most common temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disorder, its effect on joint space dimensions and associated morphology remains unclear.

Purpose: This study aimed to determine whether DD status and sex are associated with differences in joint space dimensions and related bony morphology, based on combined TMJ magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography (CT) evaluations.

Study design, setting, sample: This retrospective cross-sectional study included patients who underwent paired magnetic resonance imaging and CT scans at Seoul National University Dental Hospital between 2008 and 2023. Exclusion criteria were congenital anomalies, systemic diseases, previous TMJ, orthodontic or orthognathic treatment, and trauma involving the TMJ.

Predictor variable: The predictor variables were 1) DD status, categorized as normal disc position (NR), DD with reduction, and DD without reduction and 2) sex, coded as male or female.

Main outcome variable: The main outcome variable was joint space dimensions, selected for their influence on condylar position, including sagittal (anterior, superior, and posterior) and coronal (medial, central, and lateral) joint space distances (mm), and anterior, superior, posterior, and total joint space volumes (mm3).

Covariates: Age, CT modality (cone-beam CT vs multidetector CT), and laterality (right vs left) were considered as potential covariates.

Analyses: Linear mixed-effects models with a subject-level random intercept were applied, with Bonferroni and false discovery rate adjustments. Statistical significance was set at P < .05.

Results: The sample consisted of 85 subjects (24.6 ± 6.8 years), including 41 males (48.2%) and 44 females (51.8%). Age, CT modality, and laterality did not affect outcomes (P > .05). Compared with NR joints, DD joints exhibited a smaller condyle within a larger fossa (P < .05) and significantly greater anterior joint space distance in the sagittal plane, without differences in superior or posterior distances (P = .108 and P = 0.913, respectively). Coronal joint space distances did not show differences (P > .40). Anterior joint space volume was larger in DD joints than in NR joints (P < .001). Sex did not significantly influence these associations (P > .05).

Conclusions and relevance: DD is associated with smaller condyles and enlarged fossa, contributing to increased anterior joint space dimensions. These findings may aid diagnosis and treatment planning in patients with TMJ DD.

背景:关节空间尺寸通过改变髁突位置影响上下颌关系。虽然椎间盘移位(DD)是最常见的颞下颌关节(TMJ)疾病,但其对关节间隙尺寸和相关形态学的影响尚不清楚。目的:本研究旨在通过TMJ磁共振成像和计算机断层扫描(CT)联合评估,确定DD状态和性别是否与关节间隙尺寸和相关骨形态的差异有关。研究设计、环境、样本:这项回顾性横断面研究包括2008年至2023年间在首尔国立大学牙科医院接受配对磁共振成像和CT扫描的患者。排除标准为先天性异常、全身性疾病、以前的TMJ、正畸或正颌治疗以及涉及TMJ的创伤。预测变量:预测变量为:1)DD状态,分为正常椎间盘位置(NR)、DD有复位和DD无复位;2)性别,编码为男性或女性。主要结局变量:主要结局变量为关节间隙尺寸,选择关节间隙尺寸是因为其对髁突位置的影响,包括矢状面(前、上、后)和冠状面(内侧、中央、外侧)关节间隙距离(mm),以及前、上、后和总关节间隙体积(mm3)。协变量:年龄、CT模态(锥束CT vs多探测器CT)和侧卧(右vs左)被认为是潜在的协变量。分析:采用具有受试者水平随机截距的线性混合效应模型,并采用Bonferroni和错误发现率调整。差异有统计学意义,P < 0.05。结果:共85例(24.6±6.8岁),其中男性41例(48.2%),女性44例(51.8%)。年龄、CT方式和侧位对结果没有影响(P < 0.05)。与NR关节相比,DD关节的髁突更小,窝更大(P < 0.05),矢状面前关节间隙距离更大,上、后关节间距差异无统计学意义(P = 0.108, P = 0.913)。冠状关节间隙距离差异无统计学意义(P < 0.40)。DD关节前关节间隙体积大于NR关节(P < 0.001)。性别对这些关联没有显著影响(P < 0.05)。结论和相关性:DD与较小的髁突和扩大的窝相关,导致前关节间隙尺寸增加。这些发现可能有助于tmjdd患者的诊断和治疗计划。
{"title":"Does Temporomandibular Joint Disc Displacement Influence Joint Space Dimensions, and Does Sex Play a Role?","authors":"Jin-Beom Kim, Jung-Sub An, Kyung-Hoe Huh, Sug-Joon Ahn","doi":"10.1016/j.joms.2025.12.010","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.joms.2025.12.010","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Joint space dimensions influence maxillomandibular relationships by altering condylar position. Although disc displacement (DD) is the most common temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disorder, its effect on joint space dimensions and associated morphology remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to determine whether DD status and sex are associated with differences in joint space dimensions and related bony morphology, based on combined TMJ magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography (CT) evaluations.</p><p><strong>Study design, setting, sample: </strong>This retrospective cross-sectional study included patients who underwent paired magnetic resonance imaging and CT scans at Seoul National University Dental Hospital between 2008 and 2023. Exclusion criteria were congenital anomalies, systemic diseases, previous TMJ, orthodontic or orthognathic treatment, and trauma involving the TMJ.</p><p><strong>Predictor variable: </strong>The predictor variables were 1) DD status, categorized as normal disc position (NR), DD with reduction, and DD without reduction and 2) sex, coded as male or female.</p><p><strong>Main outcome variable: </strong>The main outcome variable was joint space dimensions, selected for their influence on condylar position, including sagittal (anterior, superior, and posterior) and coronal (medial, central, and lateral) joint space distances (mm), and anterior, superior, posterior, and total joint space volumes (mm<sup>3</sup>).</p><p><strong>Covariates: </strong>Age, CT modality (cone-beam CT vs multidetector CT), and laterality (right vs left) were considered as potential covariates.</p><p><strong>Analyses: </strong>Linear mixed-effects models with a subject-level random intercept were applied, with Bonferroni and false discovery rate adjustments. Statistical significance was set at P < .05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sample consisted of 85 subjects (24.6 ± 6.8 years), including 41 males (48.2%) and 44 females (51.8%). Age, CT modality, and laterality did not affect outcomes (P > .05). Compared with NR joints, DD joints exhibited a smaller condyle within a larger fossa (P < .05) and significantly greater anterior joint space distance in the sagittal plane, without differences in superior or posterior distances (P = .108 and P = 0.913, respectively). Coronal joint space distances did not show differences (P > .40). Anterior joint space volume was larger in DD joints than in NR joints (P < .001). Sex did not significantly influence these associations (P > .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>DD is associated with smaller condyles and enlarged fossa, contributing to increased anterior joint space dimensions. These findings may aid diagnosis and treatment planning in patients with TMJ DD.</p>","PeriodicalId":16612,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145892573","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1