Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics最新文献

The International Society of Pharmacometrics (ISoP) Mentorship Program (IMP) aims to help professionals at all career stages to transition into the pharmacometrics field, move to a different role/area within pharmacometrics, or expand their skillsets. The program connects mentees at various stages of their careers with mentors based on established criteria for mentor-mentee matching. Pairing mentees with appropriate mentors ensures strong alignment between mentees' interests and mentors' expertise as this is critical to the success and continuation of the relationship between the mentor and mentee. Once mentors and mentees are connected, they are strongly encouraged to meet at least once per month for an hour. The mentor and mentee have the freedom to tailor their sessions to their liking, including frequency, duration, and topics they choose to focus on. Mentees are encouraged to clearly define their goals to help direct their mentor-mentee relationship and conversations. Mentees and mentors alike are given the opportunity to provide feedback about the program to the ISoP Education Committee through surveys and testimonials. Due to the program's infancy, structured guidelines for mentor-mentee sessions are still being developed and instituted using the program evaluation described in this paper.

An adequate covariate selection is a key step in population pharmacokinetic modelling. In this study, the automated stepwise covariate modelling technique ('scm') was compared to full random effects modelling ('frem'). We evaluated the power to identify a 'true' covariate (covariate with highest correlation to the pharmacokinetic parameter), precision, and accuracy of the parameter-covariate estimates. Furthermore, the predictive performance of the final models was assessed. The scenarios varied in covariate effect sizes, number of individuals (n = 20-500) and covariate correlations (0-90% cov-corr). The PsN 'frem' routine provides a 90% confidence intervals around the covariate effects. This was used to evaluate its operational characteristics for a statistical backward elimination procedure, defined as 'frem_posthoc' and to facilitate the comparison to 'scm'. 'Frem_posthoc' had a higher power to detect the true covariate with lower bias in small n studies compared to 'scm', applied with commonly used settings (forward p < 0.05, backward p < 0.01). This finding was vice versa in a statistically similar setting. For 'frem_posthoc', power, precision and accuracy of the covariate coefficient increased with higher number of individuals and covariate effect magnitudes. Without a backward elimination step 'frem' models provided unbiased coefficients with highly imprecise coefficients in small n datasets. Yet, precision was superior to final 'scm' model precision obtained using common settings. We conclude that 'frem_posthoc' is also a suitable method to guide covariate selection, although intended to serve as a full model approach. However, a deliberated selection of automated methods is essential for the modeller and using those methods in small datasets needs to be taken with caution.

Model-based meta-analysis (MBMA) is an approach that integrates relevant summary level data from heterogeneously designed randomized controlled trials (RCTs). This study not only evaluated the predictability of a published MBMA for forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV₁) and its link to annual exacerbation rate in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) but also included data from new RCTs. A comparative effectiveness analysis across all drugs was also performed. Aggregated level data were collected from RCTs published between July 2013 and November 2020 (n = 132 references comprising 156 studies) and combined with data used in the legacy MBMA (published RCTs up to July 2013 - n = 142). The augmented data (n = 298) were used to evaluate the predictive performance of the published MBMA using goodness-of-fit plots for assessment. Furthermore, the model was extended including drugs that were not available before July 2013, estimating a new set of parameters. The legacy MBMA model predicted the post-2013 FEV₁ data well, and new estimated parameters were similar to those of drugs in the same class. However, the exacerbation model overpredicted the post-2013 mean annual exacerbation rate data. Inclusion of year when the study started on the pre-treatment placebo rate improved the model predictive performance perhaps explaining potential improvements in the disease management over time. The addition of new data to the legacy COPD MBMA enabled a more robust model with increased predictability performance for both endpoints FEV₁ and mean annual exacerbation rate.

Standard endpoints such as objective response rate are usually poorly correlated with overall survival (OS) for treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Longitudinal tumor size may serve as a more useful predictor of OS, and establishing a quantitative relationship between tumor kinetics (TK) and OS is a crucial step for successfully predicting OS based on limited tumor size measurements. This study aims to develop a population TK model in combination with a parametric survival model by sequential and joint modeling approaches to characterize durvalumab phase I/II data from patients with metastatic urothelial cancer, and to evaluate and compare the performance of the two modeling approaches in terms of parameter estimates, TK and survival predictions, and covariate identification. The tumor growth rate constant was estimated to be greater for patients with OS ≤ 16 weeks as compared to that for patients with OS > 16 weeks with the joint modeling approach (k_g= 0.130 vs. 0.0551 week^-1, p-value < 0.0001), but similar for both groups (k_g = 0.0624 vs.0.0563 week^-1, p-value = 0.37) with the sequential modeling approach. The predicted TK profiles by joint modeling appeared better aligned with clinical observations. Joint modeling also predicted OS more accurately than the sequential approach according to concordance index and Brier score. The sequential and joint modeling approaches were also compared using additional simulated datasets, and survival was predicted better by joint modeling in the case of a strong association between TK and OS. In conclusion, joint modeling enabled the establishment of a robust association between TK and OS and may represent a better choice for parametric survival analyses over the sequential approach.

Fractional differential equations (FDEs), i.e. differential equations with derivatives of non-integer order, can describe certain experimental datasets more accurately than classic models and have found application in pharmacokinetics (PKs), but wider applicability has been hindered by the lack of appropriate software. In the present work an extension of NONMEM software is introduced, as a FORTRAN subroutine, that allows the definition of nonlinear mixed effects (NLME) models with FDEs. The new subroutine can handle arbitrary user defined linear and nonlinear models with multiple equations, and multiple doses and can be integrated in NONMEM workflows seamlessly, working well with third party packages. The performance of the subroutine in parameter estimation exercises, with simple linear and nonlinear (Michaelis-Menten) fractional PK models has been evaluated by simulations and an application to a real clinical dataset of diazepam is presented. In the simulation study, model parameters were estimated for each of 100 simulated datasets for the two models. The relative mean bias (RMB) and relative root mean square error (RRMSE) were calculated in order to assess the bias and precision of the methodology. In all cases both RMB and RRMSE were below 20% showing high accuracy and precision for the estimates. For the diazepam application the fractional model that best described the drug kinetics was a one-compartment linear model which had similar performance, according to diagnostic plots and Visual Predictive Check, to a three-compartment classic model, but including four less parameters than the latter. To the best of our knowledge, it is the first attempt to use FDE systems in an NLME framework, so the approach could be of interest to other disciplines apart from PKs.

Methylphenidate (MPH) is a psychostimulant which inhibits the uptake of dopamine and norepinephrine transporters, DAT and NET, and is mostly used to treat Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. The current dose optimization is done through titration, a cumbersome approach for patients. To assess the therapeutic performance of MPH regimens, we introduce an in silico framework composed of (i) a population pharmacokinetic model of MPH, (ii) a pharmacodynamic (PD) model of DAT and NET occupancy, (iii) a therapeutic box delimited by time and DAT occupancy, and (iv) a performance score computation. DAT occupancy data was digitized (n = 152) and described with Emax models. NET occupancy was described with a KPD model. We used this integrative framework to simulate the performance of extended-release (18-99 mg) and tid MPH regimens (25-40 mg). Early blood samples of MPH seem to lead to higher DAT occupancy, consistent with an acute tolerance observed in clinical rating scales. An Emax model with a time-dependent tolerance was fitted to available data to assess the observed clockwise hysteresis. Peak performance is observed at 63 mg. While our analysis does not deny the existence of an acute tolerance, data precision in terms of formulation and sampling times does not allow a definite confirmation of this phenomenon. This work justifies the need for a more systematic collection of DAT and NET occupancy data to further investigate the presence of acute tolerance and assess the impact of low MPH doses on its efficacy.