Pub Date : 2025-04-11DOI: 10.1007/s10928-025-09966-7
Emily Behrens, Sebastian G Wicha
Modeling interoccasion variability (IOV) of pharmacokinetic parameters is challenging in sparse study designs. We conducted a simulation study with stochastic simulation and estimation (SSE) to evaluate the influence of IOV (25, 75%CV) from numerous perspectives (power, type I error, accuracy and precision of parameter estimates, consequences of neglecting an IOV, capability to detect the 'correct' IOV). To expand the scope from modeling-related aspects to clinical trial practice, we investigated the minimal sample size for IOV detection and calculated areas under the concentration-time curve (AUC) derived from models containing IOV and mis-specified models. The power to correctly detect an IOV increased from one to three occasions (OCC) and the type I error rate to falsely include an IOV was not elevated. Two sampling schemes were compared (with/without trough sample) and including a trough sample resulted in better performance throughout the different evaluations in this simulation study. Parameters were estimated more precisely when more OCCs were included and IOV was of high effect size. Neglecting an IOV that was truly present had a high impact on bias and imprecision of the parameter estimates, mostly on interindividual variabilities and residual error. To reach a power of ≥ 95% in all scenarios when sampling in three OCCs between 10 and 50 patients were required in the investigated setting. AUC calculations with mis-specified models revealed a distorted AUC distribution as IOV was not considered.
{"title":"Interoccasion variability in population pharmacokinetic models: identifiability, influence, interdependencies and derived study design recommendations.","authors":"Emily Behrens, Sebastian G Wicha","doi":"10.1007/s10928-025-09966-7","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10928-025-09966-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Modeling interoccasion variability (IOV) of pharmacokinetic parameters is challenging in sparse study designs. We conducted a simulation study with stochastic simulation and estimation (SSE) to evaluate the influence of IOV (25, 75%CV) from numerous perspectives (power, type I error, accuracy and precision of parameter estimates, consequences of neglecting an IOV, capability to detect the 'correct' IOV). To expand the scope from modeling-related aspects to clinical trial practice, we investigated the minimal sample size for IOV detection and calculated areas under the concentration-time curve (AUC) derived from models containing IOV and mis-specified models. The power to correctly detect an IOV increased from one to three occasions (OCC) and the type I error rate to falsely include an IOV was not elevated. Two sampling schemes were compared (with/without trough sample) and including a trough sample resulted in better performance throughout the different evaluations in this simulation study. Parameters were estimated more precisely when more OCCs were included and IOV was of high effect size. Neglecting an IOV that was truly present had a high impact on bias and imprecision of the parameter estimates, mostly on interindividual variabilities and residual error. To reach a power of ≥ 95% in all scenarios when sampling in three OCCs between 10 and 50 patients were required in the investigated setting. AUC calculations with mis-specified models revealed a distorted AUC distribution as IOV was not considered.</p>","PeriodicalId":16851,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics","volume":"52 2","pages":"23"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11992005/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144026449","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-04-04DOI: 10.1007/s10928-025-09969-4
Xian Pan, Karen Rowland Yeo
About 15-20% of women experience postnatal depression and may seek advice about medication use whilst breastfeeding. Venlafaxine is a potent and selective neuronal serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor indicated for treating major depressive disorders. The drug is mainly metabolised by cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6) to its active metabolite O-desmethylvenlafaxine (ODV), with small contributions from CYP2C9 and CYP2C19. Subsequently, the formed ODV undergoes CYP3A4- and UGT-mediated metabolism and renal excretion. A physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model describing the disposition of both venlafaxine and ODV was developed. Consistent with observed data, simulations showed that exposure of the combined active moieties (venlafaxine plus ODV) was similar for both CYP2D6 extensive (EM) and poor metaboliser (PM) subjects. Clinical lactation data for venlafaxine were available from several studies but CYP genotypes were not recorded. Interestingly, based on simulated exposures in breast milk, the estimated average relative infant daily dose (RIDD) ranged from 3.8% for all EMs to 7.6% for all PMs of CYP2D6, CYP2C9 and CYP2C19. Furthermore, simulations in breastfed infants indicated that both CYP polymorphisms and enzyme ontogenies contribute to the significant variability that is observed clinically but the combined exposures of venlafaxine and ODV remain below the thresholds that have been reported for adverse events in adults and children. The data generated here add to the existing knowledge base and can help clinicians and their patients make a more informed decision on the use of venlafaxine during breastfeeding.
{"title":"Advancing inclusive healthcare through PBPK modelling: predicting the impact of CYP genotypes and enzyme ontogenies on infant exposures of venlafaxine and its active metabolite O-desmethylvenlafaxine in lactation.","authors":"Xian Pan, Karen Rowland Yeo","doi":"10.1007/s10928-025-09969-4","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10928-025-09969-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>About 15-20% of women experience postnatal depression and may seek advice about medication use whilst breastfeeding. Venlafaxine is a potent and selective neuronal serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor indicated for treating major depressive disorders. The drug is mainly metabolised by cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6) to its active metabolite O-desmethylvenlafaxine (ODV), with small contributions from CYP2C9 and CYP2C19. Subsequently, the formed ODV undergoes CYP3A4- and UGT-mediated metabolism and renal excretion. A physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model describing the disposition of both venlafaxine and ODV was developed. Consistent with observed data, simulations showed that exposure of the combined active moieties (venlafaxine plus ODV) was similar for both CYP2D6 extensive (EM) and poor metaboliser (PM) subjects. Clinical lactation data for venlafaxine were available from several studies but CYP genotypes were not recorded. Interestingly, based on simulated exposures in breast milk, the estimated average relative infant daily dose (RIDD) ranged from 3.8% for all EMs to 7.6% for all PMs of CYP2D6, CYP2C9 and CYP2C19. Furthermore, simulations in breastfed infants indicated that both CYP polymorphisms and enzyme ontogenies contribute to the significant variability that is observed clinically but the combined exposures of venlafaxine and ODV remain below the thresholds that have been reported for adverse events in adults and children. The data generated here add to the existing knowledge base and can help clinicians and their patients make a more informed decision on the use of venlafaxine during breastfeeding.</p>","PeriodicalId":16851,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics","volume":"52 2","pages":"22"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11971150/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143788374","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-03-27DOI: 10.1007/s10928-025-09968-5
Niklas Hartung, Aleksandra Khatova
Statistical modelling of covariate distributions allows to generate virtual populations or to impute missing values in a covariate dataset. Covariate distributions typically have non-Gaussian margins and show nonlinear correlation structures, which simple descriptions like multivariate Gaussian distributions fail to represent. Prominent non-Gaussian frameworks for covariate distribution modelling are copula-based models and models based on multiple imputation by chained equations (MICE). While both frameworks have already found applications in the life sciences, a systematic investigation of their goodness-of-fit to the theoretical underlying distribution, indicating strengths and weaknesses under different conditions, is still lacking. To bridge this gap, we thoroughly evaluated covariate distribution models in terms of Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence, a scale-invariant information-theoretic goodness-of-fit criterion for distributions. Methodologically, we proposed a new approach to construct confidence intervals for KL divergence by combining nearest neighbour-based KL divergence estimators with subsampling-based uncertainty quantification. In relevant data sets of different sizes and dimensionalities with both continuous and discrete covariates, non-Gaussian models showed consistent improvements in KL divergence, compared to simpler Gaussian or scale transform approximations. KL divergence estimates were also robust to the inclusion of latent variables and large fractions of missing values. While good generalization behaviour to new data could be seen in copula-based models, MICE shows a trend for overfitting and its performance should always be evaluated on separate test data. Parametric copula models and MICE were found to scale much better with the dimension of the dataset than nonparametric copula models. These findings corroborate the potential of non-Gaussian models for modelling realistic life science covariate distributions.
{"title":"Information-theoretic evaluation of covariate distributions models.","authors":"Niklas Hartung, Aleksandra Khatova","doi":"10.1007/s10928-025-09968-5","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10928-025-09968-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Statistical modelling of covariate distributions allows to generate virtual populations or to impute missing values in a covariate dataset. Covariate distributions typically have non-Gaussian margins and show nonlinear correlation structures, which simple descriptions like multivariate Gaussian distributions fail to represent. Prominent non-Gaussian frameworks for covariate distribution modelling are copula-based models and models based on multiple imputation by chained equations (MICE). While both frameworks have already found applications in the life sciences, a systematic investigation of their goodness-of-fit to the theoretical underlying distribution, indicating strengths and weaknesses under different conditions, is still lacking. To bridge this gap, we thoroughly evaluated covariate distribution models in terms of Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence, a scale-invariant information-theoretic goodness-of-fit criterion for distributions. Methodologically, we proposed a new approach to construct confidence intervals for KL divergence by combining nearest neighbour-based KL divergence estimators with subsampling-based uncertainty quantification. In relevant data sets of different sizes and dimensionalities with both continuous and discrete covariates, non-Gaussian models showed consistent improvements in KL divergence, compared to simpler Gaussian or scale transform approximations. KL divergence estimates were also robust to the inclusion of latent variables and large fractions of missing values. While good generalization behaviour to new data could be seen in copula-based models, MICE shows a trend for overfitting and its performance should always be evaluated on separate test data. Parametric copula models and MICE were found to scale much better with the dimension of the dataset than nonparametric copula models. These findings corroborate the potential of non-Gaussian models for modelling realistic life science covariate distributions.</p>","PeriodicalId":16851,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics","volume":"52 2","pages":"21"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11950120/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143730688","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-03-18DOI: 10.1007/s10928-025-09965-8
Abigail J Bokor, Nick Holford, Jacqueline A Hannam
The time course of biomarkers (e.g., acute phase proteins) are typically described using days relative to events of interest, such as surgery or birth, without specifying the sample time. This limits their use as they may change rapidly during a single day. We investigated strategies to impute missing clock times, using procalcitonin for population modelling as the motivating example. 1275 procalcitonin concentrations from 282 neonates were available with dates but not sample times (Scenario 0). Missing clock times were imputed using a random uniform distribution under three scenarios: (1) minimum sampling intervals (8-12 h); (2) procalcitonin concentrations increase for postnatal days 0-1 then decrease; (3) standard sampling practice at the study hospital. Unique datasets (n = 100) were created with scenario-specific imputed clock times. Procalcitonin was modelled for each scenario using the same non-linear mixed effects model using NONMEM. Scenarios were evaluated by the NONMEM objective function value compared to Scenario 0 (∆OFV) and with visual predictive checks. Scenario 3, based on standard sampling practice at the study hospital, was the best imputation procedure with an improved objective function value compared to Scenario 0 (∆OFV: -62.6). Scenario 3 showed a shorter lag time between the birth event and the procalcitonin concentration increase (average: 12.0 h, 95% interval: 9.7 to 14.3 h) compared to other scenarios (averages: 15.3 to 18.7 h). A methodology for selecting imputation strategies for clock times was developed. This may be applied to other problems where clock times are missing.
{"title":"Imputation of missing clock times - application to procalcitonin concentration time course after birth.","authors":"Abigail J Bokor, Nick Holford, Jacqueline A Hannam","doi":"10.1007/s10928-025-09965-8","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10928-025-09965-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The time course of biomarkers (e.g., acute phase proteins) are typically described using days relative to events of interest, such as surgery or birth, without specifying the sample time. This limits their use as they may change rapidly during a single day. We investigated strategies to impute missing clock times, using procalcitonin for population modelling as the motivating example. 1275 procalcitonin concentrations from 282 neonates were available with dates but not sample times (Scenario 0). Missing clock times were imputed using a random uniform distribution under three scenarios: (1) minimum sampling intervals (8-12 h); (2) procalcitonin concentrations increase for postnatal days 0-1 then decrease; (3) standard sampling practice at the study hospital. Unique datasets (n = 100) were created with scenario-specific imputed clock times. Procalcitonin was modelled for each scenario using the same non-linear mixed effects model using NONMEM. Scenarios were evaluated by the NONMEM objective function value compared to Scenario 0 (∆OFV) and with visual predictive checks. Scenario 3, based on standard sampling practice at the study hospital, was the best imputation procedure with an improved objective function value compared to Scenario 0 (∆OFV: -62.6). Scenario 3 showed a shorter lag time between the birth event and the procalcitonin concentration increase (average: 12.0 h, 95% interval: 9.7 to 14.3 h) compared to other scenarios (averages: 15.3 to 18.7 h). A methodology for selecting imputation strategies for clock times was developed. This may be applied to other problems where clock times are missing.</p>","PeriodicalId":16851,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics","volume":"52 2","pages":"20"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11920349/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143657588","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-03-04DOI: 10.1007/s10928-025-09967-6
Feiyan Liu, Zeneng Cheng, Sanwang Li, Feifan Xie
Pharmacokinetics (PK)/pharmacodynamics (PD) modeling and simulation is crucial for optimizing antimicrobial dosing. This study assessed covariate impact on PK variability and identified scenarios where fixing the covariate with median value proves effective PK/PD simulations for antibiotics with population PK (popPK) model including only one covariate effect. Three published popPK models were employed, with creatinine clearance (CRCL) identified as a covariate on clearance (CL) for meropenem and tobramycin, and total body weight (WT) associated with the volume of distributions for daptomycin. Given a fixed dose for Meropenem (1000 mg), and a WT based dose for tobramycin (7 mg/kg) and daptomycin (6 mg/kg), PK/PD simulation outcomes (e.g., percentage of PK/PD target attainment (PTA) and toxicity risk) were compared between fixed covariate-based and covariate distribution-based approaches. Covariate impact on PK was assessed through deterministic simulation using outer bounds of covariate versus simulation using median covariate value, with an overlap ratio calculated the percentage of overlapped area under concentration-time curve (AUC) between these two simulation approaches. Meropenem and tobramycin simulations showed a broader PK profiles and distinct PTA distribution with sampled covariate distribution, while daptomycin simulations exhibited consistency in PK/PD characteristics. CRCL had a relative strong impact on meropenem and tobramycin PK, while a weak impact of WT on daptomycin PK was observed from extensive overlap in simulated PK curves, with an overlap ratio of 99.5%. Regarding a weak covariate impact on PK with high overlap ratio, sampling from covariate distribution may not significantly enhance simulation performance, fixing covariate with median value could be efficient for antibiotic PK/PD simulations.
{"title":"Sampling from covariate distribution may not always be necessary in PK/PD simulations: illustrative examples with antibiotics.","authors":"Feiyan Liu, Zeneng Cheng, Sanwang Li, Feifan Xie","doi":"10.1007/s10928-025-09967-6","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10928-025-09967-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pharmacokinetics (PK)/pharmacodynamics (PD) modeling and simulation is crucial for optimizing antimicrobial dosing. This study assessed covariate impact on PK variability and identified scenarios where fixing the covariate with median value proves effective PK/PD simulations for antibiotics with population PK (popPK) model including only one covariate effect. Three published popPK models were employed, with creatinine clearance (CRCL) identified as a covariate on clearance (CL) for meropenem and tobramycin, and total body weight (WT) associated with the volume of distributions for daptomycin. Given a fixed dose for Meropenem (1000 mg), and a WT based dose for tobramycin (7 mg/kg) and daptomycin (6 mg/kg), PK/PD simulation outcomes (e.g., percentage of PK/PD target attainment (PTA) and toxicity risk) were compared between fixed covariate-based and covariate distribution-based approaches. Covariate impact on PK was assessed through deterministic simulation using outer bounds of covariate versus simulation using median covariate value, with an overlap ratio calculated the percentage of overlapped area under concentration-time curve (AUC) between these two simulation approaches. Meropenem and tobramycin simulations showed a broader PK profiles and distinct PTA distribution with sampled covariate distribution, while daptomycin simulations exhibited consistency in PK/PD characteristics. CRCL had a relative strong impact on meropenem and tobramycin PK, while a weak impact of WT on daptomycin PK was observed from extensive overlap in simulated PK curves, with an overlap ratio of 99.5%. Regarding a weak covariate impact on PK with high overlap ratio, sampling from covariate distribution may not significantly enhance simulation performance, fixing covariate with median value could be efficient for antibiotic PK/PD simulations.</p>","PeriodicalId":16851,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics","volume":"52 2","pages":"19"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143557269","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-22DOI: 10.1007/s10928-025-09964-9
Joakim Nyberg, E Niclas Jonsson
Identification of covariates that can explain sources of variability among individuals in pharmacometric models is key, as it can lead to patient-subgrouping or patient-specific dosing strategies. Common recommendations propose to limit the covariate-parameters relationships to be tested to those that are scientifically plausible, a process called covariate "scope reduction". We investigated the possible impact of scope reduction on model parameters estimated with misspecified models in terms of omission bias (when a relevant covariate is not included in a model) and inclusion bias (when a non-relevant covariate is included). One-hundred datasets were simulated with a rich-sampling design using 8 variations of a one-compartment model with first-order absorption, having clearance (CL), volume of distribution (V), and absorption rate constant (Ka) as parameters, and body weight (WT) as covariate. Parameters were estimated using 14 models that included the covariate using fixed-effects (FEM) and 2 full random-effects models (FREM), with combinations of covariate-parameter relationships and IIV correlations. Estimated parameters were compared to the parameter values used for simulations in terms of accuracy (bias) and precision. Results showed that, in misspecified FEMs, covariate coefficients and IIV parameters were sensitive to omission bias. Conversely, misspecified covariate models did not introduce inclusion bias since the impact of a non-relevant covariate was estimated, as expected, to values close to zero, and in these cases FREM performed better than FEM. In conclusion, while inclusion bias does not seem to be an issue in misspecified models, the risk of introducing omission bias in parameter estimates should be kept in mind when considering covariate scope reduction when covariate models are implemented using fixed effects.
{"title":"The impact of misspecified covariate models on inclusion and omission bias when using fixed effects and full random effects models.","authors":"Joakim Nyberg, E Niclas Jonsson","doi":"10.1007/s10928-025-09964-9","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10928-025-09964-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Identification of covariates that can explain sources of variability among individuals in pharmacometric models is key, as it can lead to patient-subgrouping or patient-specific dosing strategies. Common recommendations propose to limit the covariate-parameters relationships to be tested to those that are scientifically plausible, a process called covariate \"scope reduction\". We investigated the possible impact of scope reduction on model parameters estimated with misspecified models in terms of omission bias (when a relevant covariate is not included in a model) and inclusion bias (when a non-relevant covariate is included). One-hundred datasets were simulated with a rich-sampling design using 8 variations of a one-compartment model with first-order absorption, having clearance (CL), volume of distribution (V), and absorption rate constant (Ka) as parameters, and body weight (WT) as covariate. Parameters were estimated using 14 models that included the covariate using fixed-effects (FEM) and 2 full random-effects models (FREM), with combinations of covariate-parameter relationships and IIV correlations. Estimated parameters were compared to the parameter values used for simulations in terms of accuracy (bias) and precision. Results showed that, in misspecified FEMs, covariate coefficients and IIV parameters were sensitive to omission bias. Conversely, misspecified covariate models did not introduce inclusion bias since the impact of a non-relevant covariate was estimated, as expected, to values close to zero, and in these cases FREM performed better than FEM. In conclusion, while inclusion bias does not seem to be an issue in misspecified models, the risk of introducing omission bias in parameter estimates should be kept in mind when considering covariate scope reduction when covariate models are implemented using fixed effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":16851,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics","volume":"52 2","pages":"18"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11846770/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143476085","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-17DOI: 10.1007/s10928-025-09962-x
Joost DeJongh, Elaine Cadogan, Michael Davies, Antonio Ramos-Montoya, Aaron Smith, Tamara van Steeg, Ryan Richards
AZD7648 is a potent inhibitor of DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK), which is part of the non-homologous end-joining DNA repair pathway. When combined with the PARP inhibitor olaparib, AZD7648 shows robust combination activity in pre-clinical ATM-knockout mouse xenograft models. To understand the combination activity of AZD7648 and olaparib, we developed a semi-mechanistic pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) model that incorporates the mechanism of action for each drug which links to proliferating, quiescent, and dying cell states with an additional Allee effect-like term to account for the non-linear growth and regression observed at low cell densities. Model parameters were fitted to training data sets that contained continuous treatment of either monotherapy or the combination. The observed interaction of AZD7648 on olaparib PK was incorporated in the PK-PD model by an effect function specific for each of the drug's MoA and was found essential to quantify drug effects at high dose levels of combination treatments. The model was able to adequately describe the observed efficacy for both monotherapy and sustained regressions in combination groups, mainly driven by maintaining a > 2:1 AUC ratio of apoptotic:proliferating cell fractions. We found that this model was suitable for forecasting intermittent dosing schedules a priori and resulted in accurate predictions when compared to xenograft efficacy data, without the need for extra, descriptive terms to describe supra-additive effects under combined dose regimes. This model provides quantitative understanding on the combination effect of AZD7648 and olaparib and allows for the exploration of the full exposure landscape without the need to experimentally test all scenarios. Furthermore, the model can be utilized to assess what exposures would be necessary in the clinic by linking it to observed or predicted human PK exposures. The model suggests 64.9 uM olaparib is sufficient to achieve tumor stasis in the absence of AZD7648, while the combination of AZD7648 and olaparib only requires plasma concentrations of 20.2 uM AZD7648 and 19.9 uM olaparib at steady-state to achieve the same effect.
AZD7648是DNA依赖性蛋白激酶(DNA- pk)的有效抑制剂,DNA- pk是非同源末端连接DNA修复途径的一部分。当与PARP抑制剂olaparib联合使用时,AZD7648在临床前的atm敲除小鼠异种移植模型中显示出强大的联合活性。为了了解AZD7648和奥拉帕尼的联合活性,我们建立了一个半机械药代动力学/药理学(PK-PD)模型,该模型结合了每种药物与增殖、静止和死亡细胞状态相关的作用机制,并添加了一个附加的Allee效应项,以解释在低细胞密度下观察到的非线性生长和回归。模型参数拟合到包含单药或联合治疗的连续治疗的训练数据集。观察到的AZD7648与奥拉帕尼PK的相互作用通过针对药物的每个MoA的效应函数纳入了PK- pd模型,并且被发现对于量化高剂量联合治疗下的药物效应至关重要。该模型能够充分描述观察到的单药治疗和联合治疗组持续退化的疗效,主要是由维持> 2:1的凋亡:增殖细胞分数的AUC比驱动的。我们发现,该模型适用于预测间歇性给药方案的先验结果,与异种移植物疗效数据相比,该模型的预测结果准确,而不需要额外的描述性术语来描述联合给药方案下的超可加性效应。该模型提供了对AZD7648与奥拉帕尼联合作用的定量认识,并允许在不需要对所有场景进行实验测试的情况下探索全暴露景观。此外,该模型可以通过将其与观察到的或预测的人类PK暴露联系起来,用于评估临床中需要哪些暴露。该模型提示,在不使用AZD7648的情况下,64.9 uM奥拉帕尼足以达到肿瘤停滞的效果,而AZD7648与奥拉帕尼联合使用时,稳态血浆浓度仅为20.2 uM AZD7648和19.9 uM奥拉帕尼即可达到相同的效果。
{"title":"Defining preclinical efficacy with the DNAPK inhibitor AZD7648 in combination with olaparib: a minimal systems pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model.","authors":"Joost DeJongh, Elaine Cadogan, Michael Davies, Antonio Ramos-Montoya, Aaron Smith, Tamara van Steeg, Ryan Richards","doi":"10.1007/s10928-025-09962-x","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10928-025-09962-x","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>AZD7648 is a potent inhibitor of DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK), which is part of the non-homologous end-joining DNA repair pathway. When combined with the PARP inhibitor olaparib, AZD7648 shows robust combination activity in pre-clinical ATM-knockout mouse xenograft models. To understand the combination activity of AZD7648 and olaparib, we developed a semi-mechanistic pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) model that incorporates the mechanism of action for each drug which links to proliferating, quiescent, and dying cell states with an additional Allee effect-like term to account for the non-linear growth and regression observed at low cell densities. Model parameters were fitted to training data sets that contained continuous treatment of either monotherapy or the combination. The observed interaction of AZD7648 on olaparib PK was incorporated in the PK-PD model by an effect function specific for each of the drug's MoA and was found essential to quantify drug effects at high dose levels of combination treatments. The model was able to adequately describe the observed efficacy for both monotherapy and sustained regressions in combination groups, mainly driven by maintaining a > 2:1 AUC ratio of apoptotic:proliferating cell fractions. We found that this model was suitable for forecasting intermittent dosing schedules a priori and resulted in accurate predictions when compared to xenograft efficacy data, without the need for extra, descriptive terms to describe supra-additive effects under combined dose regimes. This model provides quantitative understanding on the combination effect of AZD7648 and olaparib and allows for the exploration of the full exposure landscape without the need to experimentally test all scenarios. Furthermore, the model can be utilized to assess what exposures would be necessary in the clinic by linking it to observed or predicted human PK exposures. The model suggests 64.9 uM olaparib is sufficient to achieve tumor stasis in the absence of AZD7648, while the combination of AZD7648 and olaparib only requires plasma concentrations of 20.2 uM AZD7648 and 19.9 uM olaparib at steady-state to achieve the same effect.</p>","PeriodicalId":16851,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics","volume":"52 2","pages":"17"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11832700/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143440948","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-08DOI: 10.1007/s10928-025-09963-w
Daan W van Valkengoed, Makoto Hirasawa, Vivi Rottschäfer, Elizabeth C M de Lange
Plasma pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles often do not resemble the PK within the central nervous system (CNS) because of blood-brain-border (BBB) processes, like active efflux by P-glycoprotein (P-gp). Methods to predict CNS-PK are therefore desired. Here we investigate whether in vitro apparent permeability (Papp) and corrected efflux ratio (ERc) extracted from literature can be repurposed as input for the LeiCNS-PK3.4 physiologically-based PK model to confidently predict rat brain extracellular fluid (ECF) PK of P-gp substrates. Literature values of in vitro Caco-2, LLC-PK1-mdr1a/MDR1, and MDCKII-MDR1 cell line transport data were used to calculate P-gp efflux clearance (CLPgp). Subsequently, CLPgp was scaled from in vitro to in vivo through a relative expression factor (REF) based on P-gp expression differences. BrainECF PK was predicted well (within twofold error of the observed data) for 2 out of 4 P-gp substrates after short infusions and 3 out of 4 P-gp substrates after continuous infusions. Variability of in vitro parameters impacted both predicted rate and extent of drug distribution, reducing model applicability. Notably, use of transport data and in vitro P-gp expression obtained from a single study did not guarantee an accurate prediction; it often resulted in worse predictions than when using in vitro expression values reported by other labs. Overall, LeiCNS-PK3.4 shows promise in predicting brainECF PK, but this study highlights that the in vitro to in vivo translation is not yet robust. We conclude that more information is needed about context and drug dependency of in vitro data for robust brainECF PK predictions.
{"title":"Reliability of in vitro data for the mechanistic prediction of brain extracellular fluid pharmacokinetics of P-glycoprotein substrates in vivo; are we scaling correctly?","authors":"Daan W van Valkengoed, Makoto Hirasawa, Vivi Rottschäfer, Elizabeth C M de Lange","doi":"10.1007/s10928-025-09963-w","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10928-025-09963-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Plasma pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles often do not resemble the PK within the central nervous system (CNS) because of blood-brain-border (BBB) processes, like active efflux by P-glycoprotein (P-gp). Methods to predict CNS-PK are therefore desired. Here we investigate whether in vitro apparent permeability (P<sub>app</sub>) and corrected efflux ratio (ER<sub>c</sub>) extracted from literature can be repurposed as input for the LeiCNS-PK3.4 physiologically-based PK model to confidently predict rat brain extracellular fluid (ECF) PK of P-gp substrates. Literature values of in vitro Caco-2, LLC-PK1-mdr1a/MDR1, and MDCKII-MDR1 cell line transport data were used to calculate P-gp efflux clearance (CL<sub>Pgp</sub>). Subsequently, CL<sub>Pgp</sub> was scaled from in vitro to in vivo through a relative expression factor (REF) based on P-gp expression differences. BrainECF PK was predicted well (within twofold error of the observed data) for 2 out of 4 P-gp substrates after short infusions and 3 out of 4 P-gp substrates after continuous infusions. Variability of in vitro parameters impacted both predicted rate and extent of drug distribution, reducing model applicability. Notably, use of transport data and in vitro P-gp expression obtained from a single study did not guarantee an accurate prediction; it often resulted in worse predictions than when using in vitro expression values reported by other labs. Overall, LeiCNS-PK3.4 shows promise in predicting brainECF PK, but this study highlights that the in vitro to in vivo translation is not yet robust. We conclude that more information is needed about context and drug dependency of in vitro data for robust brainECF PK predictions.</p>","PeriodicalId":16851,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics","volume":"52 2","pages":"16"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11807079/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143374262","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Brain amyloid beta neuritic plaque accumulation is associated with an increased risk of progression to Alzheimer's disease (AD) [Pfeil, J., et al. in Neurobiol Aging 106: 119-129, 2021]. Several studies estimate rates of change in amyloid plaque over time in clinically heterogeneous cohorts with different factors impacting amyloid plaque accumulation from ADNI and AIBL [Laccarino, L., et al. in Annals Clin and Trans Neurol 6: 1113 1120, 2019, Vos, S.J., et al. in Brain 138: 1327-1338, 2015, Lim, Y.Y., et al. in Alzheimer's Dementia 9: 538-545, 2013], but there are no reports using non-linear mixed effect model for amyloid plaque progression over time similar to that existing of disease-modifying biomarkers for other diseases [Cook, S.F. and R.R. Bies in Current Pharmacol Rep 2: 221-230, 2016, Gueorguieva, I., et al. in Alzheimer's Dementia 19: 2253-2264, 2023]. This study describes the natural progression of amyloid accumulation with population mean and between-participant variability for baseline and intrinsic progression rates quantified across the AD spectrum. 1340 ADNI participants were followed over a 10-year period with 18F-florbetapir PET scans used for amyloid plaque detection. Non-linear mixed effect with stepwise covariate modelling (scm) was used. Change in natural amyloid plaque levels over 10 year period followed an exponential growth model with an intrinsic rate of approx. 3 centiloid units/year. Age, gender, APOE4 genotype and disease stage were important factors on the baseline in the natural amyloid model. In APOE4 homozygous carriers mean baseline amyloid was increased compared to APOE4 non carriers. These results demonstrate natural progression of amyloid plaque in the continuum of AD.
陈建军,李建军,等。脑内β -淀粉样蛋白神经斑块积累与阿尔茨海默病(AD)进展风险的相关性研究[J].中国生物医学工程杂志,2013,33(4):1129 - 1129。几项研究估计了ADNI和AIBL中不同因素影响淀粉样斑块积累的临床异质性队列中淀粉样斑块随时间的变异性[Laccarino, L.等,journal of clinical and Trans Neurol, 2019, Vos, S.J et al. in Brain 138: 1327-1338, 2015, Lim yyy等9。但目前还没有类似于其他疾病改善性生物标志物的非线性混合效应模型用于淀粉样斑块进展的报道[Cook, S.F.和R.R. Bies, contemporary medicine, 2016, Gueorguieva, et al. in Alzheimer's Dementia, 19: 2253- 2264,2023]。本研究描述了淀粉样蛋白积累的自然进程,以及在整个阿尔茨海默病谱系中量化的基线和内在进展率的人群平均和参与者之间的变异性。1340名ADNI参与者进行了为期10年的18F-florbetapir PET扫描,用于检测淀粉样斑块。采用非线性混合效应逐步协变量模型(scm)。天然淀粉样斑块水平在10年期间的变化遵循指数增长模型,其内在速率约为。3厘体单位/年。年龄、性别、APOE4基因型和疾病分期是影响自然淀粉样蛋白模型基线的重要因素。在APOE4纯合子携带者中,与APOE4非携带者相比,平均基线淀粉样蛋白增加。这些结果证明了淀粉样斑块在AD连续体中的自然进展。
{"title":"Quantifying natural amyloid plaque accumulation in the continuum of Alzheimer's disease using ADNI.","authors":"Marwa E Elhefnawy, Noel Patson, Samer Mouksassi, Goonaseelan Pillai, Sergey Shcherbinin, Emmanuel Chigutsa, Ivelina Gueorguieva","doi":"10.1007/s10928-024-09959-y","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10928-024-09959-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Brain amyloid beta neuritic plaque accumulation is associated with an increased risk of progression to Alzheimer's disease (AD) [Pfeil, J., et al. in Neurobiol Aging 106: 119-129, 2021]. Several studies estimate rates of change in amyloid plaque over time in clinically heterogeneous cohorts with different factors impacting amyloid plaque accumulation from ADNI and AIBL [Laccarino, L., et al. in Annals Clin and Trans Neurol 6: 1113 1120, 2019, Vos, S.J., et al. in Brain 138: 1327-1338, 2015, Lim, Y.Y., et al. in Alzheimer's Dementia 9: 538-545, 2013], but there are no reports using non-linear mixed effect model for amyloid plaque progression over time similar to that existing of disease-modifying biomarkers for other diseases [Cook, S.F. and R.R. Bies in Current Pharmacol Rep 2: 221-230, 2016, Gueorguieva, I., et al. in Alzheimer's Dementia 19: 2253-2264, 2023]. This study describes the natural progression of amyloid accumulation with population mean and between-participant variability for baseline and intrinsic progression rates quantified across the AD spectrum. 1340 ADNI participants were followed over a 10-year period with <sup>18</sup>F-florbetapir PET scans used for amyloid plaque detection. Non-linear mixed effect with stepwise covariate modelling (scm) was used. Change in natural amyloid plaque levels over 10 year period followed an exponential growth model with an intrinsic rate of approx. 3 centiloid units/year. Age, gender, APOE4 genotype and disease stage were important factors on the baseline in the natural amyloid model. In APOE4 homozygous carriers mean baseline amyloid was increased compared to APOE4 non carriers. These results demonstrate natural progression of amyloid plaque in the continuum of AD.</p>","PeriodicalId":16851,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics","volume":"52 1","pages":"15"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143039128","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-17DOI: 10.1007/s10928-024-09960-5
Luke Fostvedt, Jiawei Zhou, Anna G Kondic, Ioannis P Androulakis, Tongli Zhang, Meghan Pryor, Luning Zhuang, Jeroen Elassaiss-Schaap, Phyllis Chan, Helen Moore, Sean N Avedissian, Jeremy Tigh, Kosalaram Goteti, Neelima Thanneer, Jing Su, Sihem Ait-Oudhia
{"title":"Stronger together: a cross-SIG perspective on improving drug development.","authors":"Luke Fostvedt, Jiawei Zhou, Anna G Kondic, Ioannis P Androulakis, Tongli Zhang, Meghan Pryor, Luning Zhuang, Jeroen Elassaiss-Schaap, Phyllis Chan, Helen Moore, Sean N Avedissian, Jeremy Tigh, Kosalaram Goteti, Neelima Thanneer, Jing Su, Sihem Ait-Oudhia","doi":"10.1007/s10928-024-09960-5","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10928-024-09960-5","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":16851,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics","volume":"52 1","pages":"14"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143007191","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}