Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics最新文献

Mathematical modelling has become a key tool in pharmacological analysis, towards understanding dynamics of cell signalling and quantifying ligand-receptor interactions. Ordinary differential equation (ODE) models in receptor theory may be used to parameterise such interactions using timecourse data, but attention needs to be paid to the theoretical identifiability of the parameters of interest. Identifiability analysis is an often overlooked step in many bio-modelling works. In this paper we introduce structural identifiability analysis (SIA) to the field of receptor theory by applying three classical SIA methods (transfer function, Taylor Series and similarity transformation) to ligand-receptor binding models of biological importance (single ligand and Motulsky-Mahan competition binding at monomers, and a recently presented model of a single ligand binding at receptor dimers). New results are obtained which indicate the identifiable parameters for a single timecourse for Motulsky-Mahan binding and dimerised receptor binding. Importantly, we further consider combinations of experiments which may be performed to overcome issues of non-identifiability, to ensure the practical applicability of the work. The three SIA methods are demonstrated through a tutorial-style approach, using detailed calculations, which show the methods to be tractable for the low-dimensional ODE models.

There are many challenges with rare diseases drug development and rare oncology indications are not different. To understand the regulatory landscape as it relates to application of clinical pharmacology principles in rare oncology product development, we reviewed publicly available information of 39 approvals by US FDA between January 2019 and March 2023. The objective was to understand the expected clinical pharmacology studies and knowledge base in such approvals. Model informed drug development (MIDD) applications were also reviewed, as such approaches are expected to play a critical role in filling clinical pharmacology gaps in rare oncology, where number of clinical trials and size of these trials will perhaps continue to be small. The findings highlighted how clinical pharmacology contributed to the evidence of effectiveness, dose optimization and elucidation of intrinsic and extrinsic factors affecting drug's behavior. Clinical pharmacology studies were often integrated with modeling in many of the NDAs/BLAs. Of the post marketing requirements (PMR) received, 18% were for dose optimization, 49% for DDI, 8% for QTc, 49% for specific population, and 5% for food effect. Two post marketing commitments (PMC) were issued for immunogenicity of the 11 biologics submissions. 15% (6 of 39) of the submissions used maximum tolerated dose (MTD) to advance their molecule into Phase 2 studies. Of them 3 approvals received PMR for dose optimization. 3 + 3 was the most prevalent Phase 1 design with use in 74% of the New Drug Applications (NDA)/Biologic License Applications (BLA) reviewed. Rest used innovative approaches such as BLRM, BOIN or mTPi, with BLRM being the most common. Seamless clinical pharmacology and MIDD approaches are paramount for rare oncology drug development.

Avalglucosidase alfa (AVAL) was approved in the United States (2021) for patients with late-onset Pompe disease (LOPD), aged ≥ 1 year. In the present study, pharmacokinetic (PK) simulations were conducted to propose alternative dosing regimens for pediatric LOPD patients based on a bodyweight cut-off. Population PK (PopPK) analysis was performed using nonlinear mixed effect modeling approach on pooled data from three clinical trials with LOPD patients, and a phase 2 study (NCT03019406) with infantile-onset Pompe disease (IOPD: 1-12 years) patients. A total of 2257 concentration-time points from 91 patients (LOPD, n = 75; IOPD, n = 16) were included in the analysis. The model was bodyweight dependent allometric scaling with time varying bodyweight included on clearance and distribution volume. Simulations were performed for two dosing regimens (20 mg/kg or 40 mg/kg) with different bodyweight cut-off (25, 30, 35 and 40 kg) by generating virtual pediatric (1-17 years) and adult patients. Corresponding simulated individual exposures (maximal concentration, C_max and area under the curve in the 2-week dosing interval, AUC_2W), and distributions were calculated. It was found that dosing of 40 mg/kg and 20 mg/kg in pediatric patients < 30 kg and ≥ 30 kg, respectively, achieved similar AVAL exposure (based on AUC_2W) to adult patients receiving 20 mg/kg. PK simulations conducted on the basis of this model provided supporting data for the currently approved US labelling for dosing adapted bodyweight in LOPD patients ≥ 1 year by USFDA.

Dose selection is an integral part of a molecule's journey to become medicine. On top of typical challenges faced in dose selection for more common diseases, pediatric rare disease has additional unique challenges due to the combination of 'rare' and 'pediatric' populations. Using the central theme of maximizing 'relevant' information to overcome information paucity, dose selection strategy in pediatric rare diseases is discussed using a triangulation concept involving challenges, approaches and very importantly, enablers. Using actual examples, unique scenarios are discussed where specific enablers allowed certain approaches to be used to overcome the challenges. The continued need for model-informed drug development is also discussed using examples of where modeling and simulation tools have been successfully used in bridging available information to select pediatric doses in rare disease. Additionally, challenges with translation and associated dose selection of new modalities such as gene therapy in rare diseases are examined with the lens of continuous learning and knowledge development that will enable pediatric dose selection of these modalities with confidence.

Rare disease drug development is wrought with challenges not the least of which is access to the limited data currently available throughout the rare disease ecosystem where sharing of the available data is not guaranteed. Most pharmaceutical sponsors seeking to develop agents to treat rare diseases will initiate data landscaping efforts to identify various data sources that might be informative with respect to disease prevalence, patient selection and identification, disease progression and any data projecting likelihood of patient response to therapy including any genetic data. Such data are often difficult to come by for highly prevalent, mainstream disease populations let alone for the 8000 rare disease that make up the pooled patient population of rare disease patients. The future of rare disease drug development will hopefully rely on increased data sharing and collaboration among the entire rare disease ecosystem. One path to achieving this outcome has been the development of the rare disease cures accelerator, data analytics platform (RDCA-DAP) funded by the US FDA and operationalized by the Critical Path Institute. FDA intentions were clearly focused on improving the quality of rare disease regulatory applications by sponsors seeking to develop treatment options for various rare disease populations. As this initiative moves into its second year of operations it is envisioned that the increased connectivity to new and diverse data streams and tools will result in solutions that benefit the entire rare disease ecosystem and that the platform becomes a Collaboratory for engagement of this ecosystem that also includes patients and caregivers.

Pediatric populations represent a major fraction of rare diseases and compound the intrinsic challenges of pediatric drug development and drug development for rare diseases. The intertwined complexities of pediatric and rare disease populations impose unique challenges to clinical pharmacologists and require integration of novel clinical pharmacology and quantitative tools to overcome multiple hurdles during the discovery and development of new therapies. Drug development strategies for pediatric rare diseases continue to evolve to meet the inherent challenges and produce new medicines. Advances in quantitative clinical pharmacology research have been a key component in advancing pediatric rare disease research to accelerate drug development and inform regulatory decisions. This article will discuss the evolution of the regulatory landscape in pediatric rare diseases, the challenges encountered during the design of rare disease drug development programs and will highlight the use of innovative tools and potential solutions for future development programs.

Application of Bayesian methods is one the tools that can be used to face the multiple challenges that are met when clinical trials must be conducted in rare diseases. We propose in this work to use a dynamic Bayesian borrowing approach, based on a mixture prior, to complement the control arm of a comparative trial and estimate the mixture parameter by an Empirical Bayes approach. The method is compared, using simulations, with an approach based on a pre-specified (non-adaptive) informative prior. The simulation study shows that the proposed method exhibits similar power as the non-adaptive prior and drastically reduce type I error in case of severe discrepancy between the informative prior and the study control arm data. In case of limited discrepancy between the informative prior and the study control arm data, then our proposed adaptive prior does not reduce the inflation of the type I error.

Comparator arms in randomized clinical trials may be impractical and/or unethical to assemble in rare diseases. In the absence of comparator arms, evidence generated from external control studies has been used to support successful regulatory submissions and health technology assessments (HTA). However, conducting robust and rigorous external control arm studies is challenging and despite all efforts, residual biases may remain. As a result, regulatory and HTA agencies may request additional external control analyses so that decisions may be made based upon a body of supporting evidence.This paper introduces external control studies and provides an overview of the key methodological issues to be considered in the design of these studies. A series of case studies are presented in which evidence derived from one or more external controls was submitted to regulatory and HTA agencies to provide support for the consistency of findings.