Journal of Social and Political Psychology最新文献_第5页

Are we really going to get out of COVID-19 together? Secured legal status and trust among refugees and migrants 我们真的要一起走出新冠肺炎吗？难民和移民之间有保障的法律地位和信任

IF 2.1 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL

Journal of Social and Political Psychology

Pub Date : 2023-03-23 DOI: 10.5964/jspp.6969

E. Politi, A. Roblain, Laurent Licata

Building up on pre-existing vulnerabilities and social exclusions, refugees and migrants are disproportionately suffering from the negative effects of the COVID-19 outbreak. Insecure legal status is an additional stressor that may accentuate social cleavages and ultimately impair their trust in host society and institutions. Based on a diverse sample of refugees and migrants in Belgium (N = 355), the present study investigates direct and indirect effects of legal status—measured as the type of residence permit held by participants—on social and political trust during the COVID-19 outbreak. Secured legal status was positively associated with social and political trust directly, and indirectly via a serial mediation composed by two cumulative stages. First, participants with a more secured legal status experienced less material difficulties to cope with the pandemic (i.e., first material stage). Second, participant who experienced less material difficulties identified more with the host society (i.e., second symbolic stage). In turn, reduced material difficulties and increased identification with the host society were both positively associated with social and political trust. Our findings advocate for securing legal status of refugees and migrants to help societies cope cohesively with the long-lasting effects of the COVID-19 outbreak.

在先前存在的脆弱性和社会排斥的基础上，难民和移民不成比例地受到新冠肺炎疫情的负面影响。不安全的法律地位是一个额外的压力源，可能会加剧社会分裂，并最终损害他们对东道国社会和机构的信任。本研究基于比利时难民和移民的不同样本（N=355），调查了新冠肺炎爆发期间参与者持有的居住许可类型对社会和政治信任的法律地位的直接和间接影响。有保障的法律地位与社会和政治信任直接相关，也通过由两个累积阶段组成的一系列调解间接相关。首先，具有更安全法律地位的参与者在应对疫情方面遇到的物质困难较少（即第一个物质阶段）。其次，经历较少物质困难的参与者更认同东道国社会（即第二象征阶段）。反过来，物质困难的减少和对东道国社会认同的增加都与社会和政治信任呈正相关。我们的调查结果主张确保难民和移民的法律地位，以帮助社会一致应对新冠肺炎疫情的长期影响。

{"title":"Are we really going to get out of COVID-19 together? Secured legal status and trust among refugees and migrants","authors":"E. Politi, A. Roblain, Laurent Licata","doi":"10.5964/jspp.6969","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.6969","url":null,"abstract":"Building up on pre-existing vulnerabilities and social exclusions, refugees and migrants are disproportionately suffering from the negative effects of the COVID-19 outbreak. Insecure legal status is an additional stressor that may accentuate social cleavages and ultimately impair their trust in host society and institutions. Based on a diverse sample of refugees and migrants in Belgium (N = 355), the present study investigates direct and indirect effects of legal status—measured as the type of residence permit held by participants—on social and political trust during the COVID-19 outbreak. Secured legal status was positively associated with social and political trust directly, and indirectly via a serial mediation composed by two cumulative stages. First, participants with a more secured legal status experienced less material difficulties to cope with the pandemic (i.e., first material stage). Second, participant who experienced less material difficulties identified more with the host society (i.e., second symbolic stage). In turn, reduced material difficulties and increased identification with the host society were both positively associated with social and political trust. Our findings advocate for securing legal status of refugees and migrants to help societies cope cohesively with the long-lasting effects of the COVID-19 outbreak.","PeriodicalId":16973,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social and Political Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2023-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42457853","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Editorial report and acknowledgement of reviewers, 2022 编辑报告和审稿人致谢，2022

Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL

Journal of Social and Political Psychology

Pub Date : 2023-03-23 DOI: 10.5964/jspp.11553

J. Christopher Cohrs, Ana Figueiredo, Idhamsyah Eka Putra, Johanna Ray Vollhardt

Editorial Report and Acknowledgement of Reviewers, 2022 Authors J. Christopher Cohrs Philipps-University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany Ana Figueiredo Universidad de O’Higgins, Rancagua, Chile Idhamsyah Eka Putra Persada Indonesia University & DASPR, Jakarta, Indonesia Johanna Ray Vollhardt Clark University, Worcester, MA, USA Abstract No abstract available. PDF HTML XML Article info Impact Citations How to Cite License Published at 23. March 2023 https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.11553 Issue: Vol. 11 No. 1 (2023) Section: From the Editors Share: Z Cohrs, J. C., Figueiredo, A., Putra, I. E., & Vollhardt, J. R. (2023). Editorial Report and Acknowledgement of Reviewers, 2022. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 11(1), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.11553 More Citation Formats ACM ACS APA ABNT Chicago Harvard IEEE MLA Turabian Vancouver Download Citation Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) BibTeX This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 International License. PlumX Dimensions Views: Total Abstract PDF HTML XML 246 145 84 13 4 Downloads: Download data is not yet available.

J. Christopher Cohrs Philipps-University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany . Ana Figueiredo University de O 'Higgins, ranagua, Chile . Idhamsyah Eka Putra Persada印度尼西亚大学& DASPR, Jakarta, Indonesia . Johanna Ray Vollhardt Clark University, Worcester, MA, USA摘要无摘要PDF HTML XML文章信息影响引文如何引用许可出版于23。2023年3月https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.11553 Issue: Vol. 11 No. 1 (2023) Section: From Editors Share: Z Cohrs, j.c.， Figueiredo, A.， Putra, i.e， & Vollhardt, j.r.(2023)。编辑报告和审稿人致谢，2022。社会政治心理学报，11(1)，1-5。https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.11553更多引用格式ACM ACS APA ABNT芝加哥哈佛IEEE MLA Turabian温哥华下载引用Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) BibTeX本作品采用知识共享署名(CC BY) 4.0国际许可协议。PlumX维度视图:总数摘要PDF HTML XML 246 145 84 13 4下载:下载数据尚未提供。

引用次数: 0

Judging job applicants by their politics: Effects of target–rater political dissimilarity on discrimination, cooperation, and stereotyping 通过政治来判断求职者:目标评估者政治差异对歧视、合作和刻板印象的影响

Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL

Journal of Social and Political Psychology

Pub Date : 2023-03-23 DOI: 10.5964/jspp.9855

Samantha Sinclair, Artur Nilsson, Jens Agerström

Despite well-known problems associated with political prejudice, research that examines effects of political dissimilarity in organizational contexts is scarce. We present findings from a pre-registered experiment (N = 973, currently employed) which suggest that both Democrats and Republicans negatively stereotype and discriminate against job applicants with a political orientation that is dissimilar to their own. The effects were small for competence perceptions, moderate for hiring judgments, and large for warmth ratings and willingness to cooperate and socialize with the applicant. The effects of political orientation on hiring judgments and willingness to cooperate and socialize were mediated by stereotype content, particularly warmth. Furthermore, for all outcomes except competence judgments, Democrats discriminated and stereotyped applicants to a larger extent than Republicans did. These findings shed light on the consequences of applicants revealing their political orientation and have implications for the promotion of diversity in organizations.

尽管众所周知的问题与政治偏见有关，但研究政治差异在组织背景下的影响却很少。我们提出了一项预注册实验(N = 973，目前在职)的研究结果，表明民主党人和共和党人都对政治倾向与自己不同的求职者产生负面刻板印象和歧视。对能力感知的影响很小，对雇佣判断的影响中等，对热情评分和与申请人合作和社交的意愿的影响很大。政治倾向对雇佣判断、合作意愿和社交意愿的影响是通过刻板印象内容，特别是温暖来中介的。此外，除了能力判断外，在所有结果中，民主党人对申请人的歧视和刻板印象都比共和党人更严重。这些发现揭示了申请人暴露其政治倾向的后果，并对促进组织中的多样性产生了影响。

{"title":"Judging job applicants by their politics: Effects of target–rater political dissimilarity on discrimination, cooperation, and stereotyping","authors":"Samantha Sinclair, Artur Nilsson, Jens Agerström","doi":"10.5964/jspp.9855","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.9855","url":null,"abstract":"<p xmlns=\"http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/JATS1\">Despite well-known problems associated with political prejudice, research that examines effects of political dissimilarity in organizational contexts is scarce. We present findings from a pre-registered experiment (N = 973, currently employed) which suggest that both Democrats and Republicans negatively stereotype and discriminate against job applicants with a political orientation that is dissimilar to their own. The effects were small for competence perceptions, moderate for hiring judgments, and large for warmth ratings and willingness to cooperate and socialize with the applicant. The effects of political orientation on hiring judgments and willingness to cooperate and socialize were mediated by stereotype content, particularly warmth. Furthermore, for all outcomes except competence judgments, Democrats discriminated and stereotyped applicants to a larger extent than Republicans did. These findings shed light on the consequences of applicants revealing their political orientation and have implications for the promotion of diversity in organizations.","PeriodicalId":16973,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social and Political Psychology","volume":"78 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136165660","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Social invisibility and discrimination of Roma people in Italy and Brazil 在意大利和巴西，罗姆人被社会忽视和歧视

Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL

Journal of Social and Political Psychology

Pub Date : 2023-03-23 DOI: 10.5964/jspp.6453

Giannino Melotti, Mariana Bonomo, Julia Alves Brasil, Paola Villano

In everyday debates on topics such as cultural differences, it seems relevant to analyze not only institutional conversations or speeches, but also mass-media communications. The way the media portray social events contributes to the construction of our categories of explanation of the world. The main purpose of this research is to analyze the representations of ‘gypsies’ in news articles published in some of the most important national newspapers in Italy and Brazil. Results show that Italian news focuses on the living conditions of Roma people, stereotypes, crimes suffered or attributed to them, and political and cultural debates on the Roma question in Italian cities. Brazilian news indicated themes associated with Roma in the context of artistic-cultural productions (films, soap operas, songs, dances and opera and theatre plays), mentioned with other Brazilian traditional peoples and communities, as well as the death of gypsies during the Nazi period. The paper discusses the processes of social invisibility and the social production of the (re)presentation of cliché images of Roma as a social problem, marginalized in the sphere of public policies and of their fundamental rights.

在关于文化差异等主题的日常辩论中，不仅要分析机构对话或演讲，还要分析大众媒体传播，这似乎是相关的。媒体描绘社会事件的方式有助于构建我们对世界的解释范畴。本研究的主要目的是分析“吉普赛人”在意大利和巴西一些最重要的全国性报纸上发表的新闻文章中的表现。结果显示，意大利新闻关注罗姆人的生活状况、刻板印象、遭受或归咎于罗姆人的罪行，以及意大利城市中关于罗姆人问题的政治和文化辩论。巴西新闻指出，在艺术文化作品(电影、肥皂剧、歌曲、舞蹈、歌剧和戏剧)的背景下，与罗姆人有关的主题与其他巴西传统民族和社区以及纳粹时期吉普赛人的死亡有关。本文讨论了社会隐形的过程和罗姆人作为一个社会问题的刻板形象的社会生产(重新)呈现，在公共政策和基本权利领域被边缘化。

{"title":"Social invisibility and discrimination of Roma people in Italy and Brazil","authors":"Giannino Melotti, Mariana Bonomo, Julia Alves Brasil, Paola Villano","doi":"10.5964/jspp.6453","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.6453","url":null,"abstract":"<p xmlns=\"http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/JATS1\">In everyday debates on topics such as cultural differences, it seems relevant to analyze not only institutional conversations or speeches, but also mass-media communications. The way the media portray social events contributes to the construction of our categories of explanation of the world. The main purpose of this research is to analyze the representations of ‘gypsies’ in news articles published in some of the most important national newspapers in Italy and Brazil. Results show that Italian news focuses on the living conditions of Roma people, stereotypes, crimes suffered or attributed to them, and political and cultural debates on the Roma question in Italian cities. Brazilian news indicated themes associated with Roma in the context of artistic-cultural productions (films, soap operas, songs, dances and opera and theatre plays), mentioned with other Brazilian traditional peoples and communities, as well as the death of gypsies during the Nazi period. The paper discusses the processes of social invisibility and the social production of the (re)presentation of cliché images of Roma as a social problem, marginalized in the sphere of public policies and of their fundamental rights.","PeriodicalId":16973,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social and Political Psychology","volume":"172 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136151766","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Performing identity entrepreneurship during the colonisation of New Zealand: A rhetorical construction of ‘loyal subjects of the Empire’ 新西兰殖民时期的身份创业:“帝国忠诚臣民”的修辞建构

IF 2.1 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL

Journal of Social and Political Psychology

Pub Date : 2022-12-22 DOI: 10.5964/jspp.6477

Sarah Y Choi, James H. Liu, M. Belgrave

A thematic analysis of New Zealand’s historical Speeches from the Throne (10 speeches, from 1860-1899) investigated rhetorical strategies used by Governors during colonisation, to mobilise both settler and indigenous people’s participation in the British Empire. Identity leadership (Reicher & Hopkins, 2001, https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.00246), augmented by critical theories of emotion (Williams, 1977, Marxism and literature. Oxford University Press) under the cultural framework of hierarchical relationalism (Liu, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.12058) was applied to show how unequal but reciprocal relationships were invoked by Governors, as representatives of the Crown and advocates for the general public in New Zealand. Governors attempted to mediate a positive shared identity within the British Empire; but at the same time to isolate those who excluded from subjecthood by their hostility to the Crown. Governors alternated between efforts to mobilise people against indigenous Māori who challenged them, and offers to include Māori who conformed to the conventions required of a hierarchical relationship between Crown and subject. We reflect on how these dynamics of rhetorical performance may still be relevant today, especially in contexts of hierarchy and in the domain of leader-follower relations more broadly.

对新西兰历史上的王座演讲(10次演讲，从1860年到1899年)进行了专题分析，调查了殖民时期总督使用的修辞策略，以动员定居者和土著人民参与大英帝国。身份领导(Reicher & Hopkins, 2001, https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.00246)，由情感批判理论(Williams, 1977，马克思主义和文学)增强。牛津大学出版社)在等级关系主义的文化框架下(Liu, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.12058)被应用于展示总督是如何援引不平等但互惠的关系的，作为皇冠的代表和新西兰公众的倡导者。总督们试图在大英帝国内部调解一个积极的共同身份;同时孤立那些因敌视国王而被排除在主体性之外的人。总督们时而努力动员人民反对挑战他们的土著Māori，时而提议接纳遵守君主与臣民之间等级关系所要求的惯例的Māori。我们反思了这些修辞表现的动态如何在今天仍然相关，特别是在等级制度的背景下和更广泛的领导-追随者关系领域。

{"title":"Performing identity entrepreneurship during the colonisation of New Zealand: A rhetorical construction of ‘loyal subjects of the Empire’","authors":"Sarah Y Choi, James H. Liu, M. Belgrave","doi":"10.5964/jspp.6477","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.6477","url":null,"abstract":"A thematic analysis of New Zealand’s historical Speeches from the Throne (10 speeches, from 1860-1899) investigated rhetorical strategies used by Governors during colonisation, to mobilise both settler and indigenous people’s participation in the British Empire. Identity leadership (Reicher & Hopkins, 2001, https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.00246), augmented by critical theories of emotion (Williams, 1977, Marxism and literature. Oxford University Press) under the cultural framework of hierarchical relationalism (Liu, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.12058) was applied to show how unequal but reciprocal relationships were invoked by Governors, as representatives of the Crown and advocates for the general public in New Zealand. Governors attempted to mediate a positive shared identity within the British Empire; but at the same time to isolate those who excluded from subjecthood by their hostility to the Crown. Governors alternated between efforts to mobilise people against indigenous Māori who challenged them, and offers to include Māori who conformed to the conventions required of a hierarchical relationship between Crown and subject. We reflect on how these dynamics of rhetorical performance may still be relevant today, especially in contexts of hierarchy and in the domain of leader-follower relations more broadly.","PeriodicalId":16973,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social and Political Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2022-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44838007","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Market mindset reduces endorsement of individualizing moral foundations, but not in liberals 市场心态减少了对个性化道德基础的认可，但自由主义者却没有

IF 2.1 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL

Journal of Social and Political Psychology

Pub Date : 2022-12-20 DOI: 10.5964/jspp.8163

T. Zaleskiewicz, Agata Gąsiorowska, A. Kuzminska

People with a market mindset attend to ratios and rates, and allocate rewards adequately to costs but are less sensitive to feelings. In this project, we demonstrate that activating a market mindset also affects people’s acceptance of free-market principles and their endorsement of individualizing moral dimensions—care/harm and fairness/cheating. Experiment 1 documented that a market mindset positively impacted people’s endorsement of fair market ideology. Experiments 2 and 3 showed that the salience of such a market mindset hampered the importance of individualizing moral dimensions. Importantly, we found that political orientation moderated the negative effect of a market mindset on the endorsement of individualizing moral foundations—this effect held for participants who declared moderate and conservative political orientations, but not for liberals.

具有市场思维的人关注比率和费率，并将奖励充分分配给成本，但对感觉不太敏感。在这个项目中，我们证明，激活市场心态也会影响人们对自由市场原则的接受，以及他们对个性化道德维度的认可——关心/伤害和公平/欺骗。实验1证明，市场心态对人们对公平市场意识形态的认可产生了积极影响。实验2和3表明，这种市场心态的突出阻碍了个性化道德维度的重要性。重要的是，我们发现政治取向调节了市场心态对支持个性化道德基础的负面影响——这种影响适用于那些宣布温和和保守政治取向的参与者，但不适用于自由主义者。

引用次数: 0

“Unavailable, insecure, and very poorly paid”: Global difficulties and inequalities in conducting social psychological research “不可用、不安全、收入非常低”：开展社会心理研究的全球困难和不平等

IF 2.1 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL

Journal of Social and Political Psychology

Pub Date : 2022-12-16 DOI: 10.5964/jspp.8311

Fouad Bou Zeineddine, R. Saab, B. Lášticová, Arin H. Ayanian, Anna Kende

This paper offers an exploration of research production in social psychology as a global endeavor from the point of view of Anglophone social psychologists (N = 232) across 64 countries. We examine social psychologists’ beliefs regarding the difficulties in conducting research in social psychology and the inequalities that they report between the Global North, South and East Europe, and the Global South. Across all regions, we found pervasive critical awareness of obstacles to conducting research – including underinvestment in the field, precarious and counter-productive labor conditions, and excessive and biased disciplinary standards. However, we also found that colleagues outside the Global North reported quantitatively and qualitatively larger obstacles to research. These included well-known historically-rooted inequalities but also contemporary systemic procedural and distributive injustices in material, human, and social-political capital. Non-Northern colleagues in particular critically reflected on how these inequalities and injustices are amplified by Northern hegemonies in social, institutional, disciplinary, economic, and political systems. Discussion focuses on the implications of these results for social psychologists, social psychology as a discipline, and its situation within broader hierarchical systems and their intersectionalities.

本文从64个国家的英语社会心理学家（N=232）的角度，对社会心理学的研究成果进行了探索。我们考察了社会心理学家对进行社会心理学研究的困难以及他们报告的全球北欧、南欧和东欧以及全球南方之间的不平等的看法。在所有地区，我们发现普遍存在对开展研究障碍的批判性认识，包括该领域投资不足、不稳定和适得其反的劳动条件，以及过度和有偏见的纪律标准。然而，我们也发现，全球北方以外的同事在数量和质量上都报告了更大的研究障碍。其中包括众所周知的历史根源的不平等，但也包括当代物质、人力和社会政治资本方面的系统性程序和分配不公。非北方同事尤其批判性地反思了北方在社会、制度、纪律、经济和政治体系中的霸权是如何放大这些不平等和不公正的。讨论的重点是这些结果对社会心理学家的影响，社会心理学作为一门学科，以及它在更广泛的等级制度中的地位及其交叉性。

{"title":"“Unavailable, insecure, and very poorly paid”: Global difficulties and inequalities in conducting social psychological research","authors":"Fouad Bou Zeineddine, R. Saab, B. Lášticová, Arin H. Ayanian, Anna Kende","doi":"10.5964/jspp.8311","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.8311","url":null,"abstract":"This paper offers an exploration of research production in social psychology as a global endeavor from the point of view of Anglophone social psychologists (N = 232) across 64 countries. We examine social psychologists’ beliefs regarding the difficulties in conducting research in social psychology and the inequalities that they report between the Global North, South and East Europe, and the Global South. Across all regions, we found pervasive critical awareness of obstacles to conducting research – including underinvestment in the field, precarious and counter-productive labor conditions, and excessive and biased disciplinary standards. However, we also found that colleagues outside the Global North reported quantitatively and qualitatively larger obstacles to research. These included well-known historically-rooted inequalities but also contemporary systemic procedural and distributive injustices in material, human, and social-political capital. Non-Northern colleagues in particular critically reflected on how these inequalities and injustices are amplified by Northern hegemonies in social, institutional, disciplinary, economic, and political systems. Discussion focuses on the implications of these results for social psychologists, social psychology as a discipline, and its situation within broader hierarchical systems and their intersectionalities.","PeriodicalId":16973,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social and Political Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2022-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46994378","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 5

Disentangling the factors behind shifting voting intentions: The bandwagon effect reflects heuristic processing, while the underdog effect reflects fairness concerns 拆解投票意向变化背后的因素:从众效应反映了启发式处理，而失败者效应反映了公平问题

IF 2.1 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL

Journal of Social and Political Psychology

Pub Date : 2022-11-30 DOI: 10.5964/jspp.9241

J. Lammers, Marcin Bukowski, A. Potoczek, A. Fleischmann, W. Hofmann

In today’s elections, abundantly available polls inform voters what parties lead and what parties trail. This allows voters to accurately predict the likely outcomes of elections before the final results are in. Voters may react to these ex-ante election outcomes by shifting their votes either toward leading parties, often termed the “bandwagon effect” or toward trailing parties, often termed the “underdog effect”. The published literature presents different perspectives on the strength of both effects and the underlying psychological processes. Three preregistered studies (total N = 1,424) test the psychological causes of both effects. Exploratory Study 1 relates differences in interpersonal, moral, strategic, and epistemic psychological factors to shifts in voting intentions before the 2019 Polish parliamentary elections. Results suggest that the bandwagon effect reflects a lack of political expertise, whereas the underdog effect reflects fairness concerns. To provide experimental evidence, Studies 2a and 2b manipulate these two factors in a simulated election design. The results confirm that low expertise increases the bandwagon effect and that fairness concerns increase the underdog effect.

在今天的选举中，大量可用的民意调查告诉选民哪些政党领先，哪些政党落后。这使选民能够在最终结果出来之前准确预测选举的可能结果。选民可能会对这些选举前的结果做出反应，将选票转向领先政党，通常被称为“跟风效应”，或转向落后政党，通常称为“劣势效应”。已发表的文献对这两种影响的强度和潜在的心理过程提出了不同的观点。三项预先登记的研究（总N=1424）测试了这两种影响的心理原因。探索性研究1将人际、道德、战略和认知心理因素的差异与2019年波兰议会选举前投票意向的变化联系起来。结果表明，跟风效应反映了政治专业知识的缺乏，而劣势效应反映了公平问题。为了提供实验证据，研究2a和2b在模拟选举设计中操纵了这两个因素。研究结果证实，低专业知识会增加跟风效应，而公平问题会增加劣势效应。

{"title":"Disentangling the factors behind shifting voting intentions: The bandwagon effect reflects heuristic processing, while the underdog effect reflects fairness concerns","authors":"J. Lammers, Marcin Bukowski, A. Potoczek, A. Fleischmann, W. Hofmann","doi":"10.5964/jspp.9241","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.9241","url":null,"abstract":"In today’s elections, abundantly available polls inform voters what parties lead and what parties trail. This allows voters to accurately predict the likely outcomes of elections before the final results are in. Voters may react to these ex-ante election outcomes by shifting their votes either toward leading parties, often termed the “bandwagon effect” or toward trailing parties, often termed the “underdog effect”. The published literature presents different perspectives on the strength of both effects and the underlying psychological processes. Three preregistered studies (total N = 1,424) test the psychological causes of both effects. Exploratory Study 1 relates differences in interpersonal, moral, strategic, and epistemic psychological factors to shifts in voting intentions before the 2019 Polish parliamentary elections. Results suggest that the bandwagon effect reflects a lack of political expertise, whereas the underdog effect reflects fairness concerns. To provide experimental evidence, Studies 2a and 2b manipulate these two factors in a simulated election design. The results confirm that low expertise increases the bandwagon effect and that fairness concerns increase the underdog effect.","PeriodicalId":16973,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social and Political Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2022-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43757964","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

The changing association between political ideology and closed-mindedness: Left and right have become more alike 政治意识形态与思想封闭之间不断变化的联系:左派和右派变得越来越相似

IF 2.1 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL

Journal of Social and Political Psychology

Pub Date : 2022-10-28 DOI: 10.5964/jspp.6751

Jesse Acosta, Markus Kemmelmeier

Evidence suggests that politically right-leaning individuals are more likely to be closed-minded. Whether this association is inherent or subject to change has been the subject of debate, yet has not been formally tested. Through a meta-analysis, we find evidence of a changing association between conservatism and facets of closed-mindedness in the U.S. and international context using 341 unique samples, over 200,000 participants, and 920 estimates over 71 years. In the U.S., data ranging from 1948 to 2019 revealed a linear decline in the association between social conservatism (SC) and closed-mindedness, though economic conservatism (EC) did not vary in its association with closed-mindedness over time. Internationally across 18 countries, excluding the U.S., we observed a curvilinear decline in the association between SC and closed-mindedness over that same time, but no change in ECs association. We also tested variation over time for attitudinal measures of conservatism ranging between 1987 to 2018. In the U.S., we observed a linear increase in the association between right-wing authoritarianism (RWA) and closed-mindedness, with a similar linear increase in the association between social dominance orientation (SDO) and closed-mindedness. Internationally, there was a curvilinear increase in the association between RWA and closed-mindedness, but no change in the association with SDO. We discuss the changes to the political landscape that might explain our findings.

有证据表明，政治上右倾的人更有可能思想封闭。这种联系是固有的还是可能发生变化一直是争论的主题，但尚未经过正式测试。通过一项荟萃分析，我们使用341个独特的样本，超过20万名参与者，以及71年来的920项估计，发现了保守主义与美国和国际背景下的封闭心态之间关系不断变化的证据。在美国，1948年至2019年的数据显示，社会保守主义（SC）与思想封闭之间的关联呈线性下降，尽管经济保守主义（EC）与思想闭塞的关联并没有随着时间的推移而变化。在除美国以外的18个国家的国际范围内，我们观察到在同一时间内，SC和封闭心态之间的联系呈曲线下降，但EC的联系没有变化。我们还测试了1987年至2018年间保守主义态度测量随时间的变化。在美国，我们观察到右翼威权主义（RWA）与思想封闭之间的关联呈线性增加，社会支配取向（SDO）与思想闭塞之间的关联也呈类似的线性增加。在国际上，RWA与思想封闭之间的关联呈曲线增加，但与SDO的关联没有变化。我们讨论了可能解释我们发现的政治格局的变化。

{"title":"The changing association between political ideology and closed-mindedness: Left and right have become more alike","authors":"Jesse Acosta, Markus Kemmelmeier","doi":"10.5964/jspp.6751","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.6751","url":null,"abstract":"Evidence suggests that politically right-leaning individuals are more likely to be closed-minded. Whether this association is inherent or subject to change has been the subject of debate, yet has not been formally tested. Through a meta-analysis, we find evidence of a changing association between conservatism and facets of closed-mindedness in the U.S. and international context using 341 unique samples, over 200,000 participants, and 920 estimates over 71 years. In the U.S., data ranging from 1948 to 2019 revealed a linear decline in the association between social conservatism (SC) and closed-mindedness, though economic conservatism (EC) did not vary in its association with closed-mindedness over time. Internationally across 18 countries, excluding the U.S., we observed a curvilinear decline in the association between SC and closed-mindedness over that same time, but no change in ECs association. We also tested variation over time for attitudinal measures of conservatism ranging between 1987 to 2018. In the U.S., we observed a linear increase in the association between right-wing authoritarianism (RWA) and closed-mindedness, with a similar linear increase in the association between social dominance orientation (SDO) and closed-mindedness. Internationally, there was a curvilinear increase in the association between RWA and closed-mindedness, but no change in the association with SDO. We discuss the changes to the political landscape that might explain our findings.","PeriodicalId":16973,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social and Political Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2022-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44425328","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Measuring openness to political pluralism 衡量对政治多元化的开放程度

IF 2.1 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL

Journal of Social and Political Psychology

Pub Date : 2022-10-21 DOI: 10.5964/jspp.7867

P. Shrout, Mao Mogami, Qi Xu, Yasaman Ghodse-Elahi, Elizabeth R Mutter, M. Riccio, T. Valshtein, V. Baadan, S. Goudarzi

In an era of increased political polarization, it is important to measure how receptive US American citizens are to diverse political views. Being more open to diverse political viewpoints—openness to political pluralism—may involve holding emotional and intellectual tolerance, non-rigidity, and proactive motivation to seek out different political perspectives. In three preregistered studies of US residents, we present a new self-report measure of openness to political pluralism (OPP) consisting of 25 items. In Study 1 (MTurk n = 400), we verified a preregistered bifactor model with four facets, conducted initial validity analyses, and created a short five-item version (OPPS). Both OPP and OPPS have high internal consistency and test-retest reliability. In Studies 2 and 3, MTurk participants (n = 258) and Qualtrics panel participants (n = 296) completed OPP and measures of related constructs to validate our scale. OPP was modestly correlated with actively open-minded thinking (AOT) and highly correlated with open-minded cognition-political (OMC-P). Greater OPP was associated with an inverted U-shape relation to left-right political orientation. It was also correlated with more politically diverse social networks and varied information seeking. We discuss how our measure of openness to political pluralism can be used in future research.

在政治两极分化加剧的时代，衡量美国公民对不同政治观点的接受程度是很重要的。对不同的政治观点持更开放的态度——对政治多元化持开放态度——可能包括保持情感和智力上的宽容，不僵化，以及积极主动地寻求不同的政治观点。在对美国居民进行的三项预登记研究中，我们提出了一种新的自我报告衡量对政治多元化的开放性(OPP)，由25个项目组成。在研究1 (MTurk n = 400)中，我们验证了一个包含四个方面的预注册双因素模型，进行了初步的效度分析，并创建了一个简短的五项版本(OPPS)。OPP和OPPS都具有较高的内部一致性和重测信度。在研究2和3中，MTurk参与者(n = 258)和qualics小组参与者(n = 296)完成了OPP和相关构图的测量，以验证我们的量表。OPP与积极开放思维(AOT)有中度相关，与开放的认知-政治(OMC-P)有高度相关。较高的OPP与左右政治倾向呈倒u型关系。它还与政治上更多样化的社交网络和不同的信息寻求有关。我们将讨论如何在未来的研究中使用我们对政治多元化的开放程度。

{"title":"Measuring openness to political pluralism","authors":"P. Shrout, Mao Mogami, Qi Xu, Yasaman Ghodse-Elahi, Elizabeth R Mutter, M. Riccio, T. Valshtein, V. Baadan, S. Goudarzi","doi":"10.5964/jspp.7867","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.7867","url":null,"abstract":"In an era of increased political polarization, it is important to measure how receptive US American citizens are to diverse political views. Being more open to diverse political viewpoints—openness to political pluralism—may involve holding emotional and intellectual tolerance, non-rigidity, and proactive motivation to seek out different political perspectives. In three preregistered studies of US residents, we present a new self-report measure of openness to political pluralism (OPP) consisting of 25 items. In Study 1 (MTurk n = 400), we verified a preregistered bifactor model with four facets, conducted initial validity analyses, and created a short five-item version (OPPS). Both OPP and OPPS have high internal consistency and test-retest reliability. In Studies 2 and 3, MTurk participants (n = 258) and Qualtrics panel participants (n = 296) completed OPP and measures of related constructs to validate our scale. OPP was modestly correlated with actively open-minded thinking (AOT) and highly correlated with open-minded cognition-political (OMC-P). Greater OPP was associated with an inverted U-shape relation to left-right political orientation. It was also correlated with more politically diverse social networks and varied information seeking. We discuss how our measure of openness to political pluralism can be used in future research.","PeriodicalId":16973,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social and Political Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2022-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45969314","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0