Background: Patient safety is a global problem and patient safety education for medical students is needed to improve the quality of health services. This study aimed to determine the mean difference of perception on nine patient safety key factors between preclinical students and clinical students.Methods: This observational analytic cross-sectional study was conducted on preclinical students and clinical students at the School of Medicine and Health Sciences of Atma Jaya Catholic University of Indonesia (AJCUI) in the academic year 2019/2020, randomly drawn in each batch. The research data was collected using the Attitude to Patient Safety Questionnaire -III (APSQ-III) with 7 Likert scales. Data analysis using independent t-test.Results: From 389 students, significant mean differences of patient safety perception between preclinical students and clinical were found for five key factors: PS training received (p = 0.000), Error reporting confidence (p = 0.000), Working hours as an error cause (p = 0.000), Team functioning (p = 0.001), and Patient involvement in reducing error (p = 0.000).Conclusion: Medical students had positive perceptions of patient safety. However, there were still some significant different perceptions between clinical and preclinical students, which indicated the need for patient safety education integration in the medical education curriculum.
{"title":"COMPARISON OF PATIENT SAFETY PERCEPTION IN PRECLINICAL AND CLINICAL STUDENTS","authors":"Yopi Simargi, Steven Alvianto","doi":"10.22146/jpki.62942","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22146/jpki.62942","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Patient safety is a global problem and patient safety education for medical students is needed to improve the quality of health services. This study aimed to determine the mean difference of perception on nine patient safety key factors between preclinical students and clinical students.Methods: This observational analytic cross-sectional study was conducted on preclinical students and clinical students at the School of Medicine and Health Sciences of Atma Jaya Catholic University of Indonesia (AJCUI) in the academic year 2019/2020, randomly drawn in each batch. The research data was collected using the Attitude to Patient Safety Questionnaire -III (APSQ-III) with 7 Likert scales. Data analysis using independent t-test.Results: From 389 students, significant mean differences of patient safety perception between preclinical students and clinical were found for five key factors: PS training received (p = 0.000), Error reporting confidence (p = 0.000), Working hours as an error cause (p = 0.000), Team functioning (p = 0.001), and Patient involvement in reducing error (p = 0.000).Conclusion: Medical students had positive perceptions of patient safety. However, there were still some significant different perceptions between clinical and preclinical students, which indicated the need for patient safety education integration in the medical education curriculum.","PeriodicalId":17805,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia: The Indonesian Journal of Medical Education","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"81895694","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Rita Arsika Fauziah, L. Amalia, Nandina Oktavia, L. E. Rakhmilla
Background: Stroke is a neurological emergency that requires prompt and precise diagnosis and treatment. However, errors in diagnosis and treatment are still frequently seen. One of the main causes of this problem is the lack of doctors’ knowledge. This study aims to determine the level of knowledge among undergraduate medical students about stroke. The results of this study can be used as basic information to provide educational interventions to medical students to prevent and minimize the occurrence of medical errors. Methods: This study used a quantitative-descriptive method with a cross-sectional approach. The study subjects were third-semester medical undergraduate students at the Medical Faculty of Padjadjaran University during the 2018/2019 academic year. Samples were 43 secondary data collected from ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke Students Objective Oral Case Analysis (SOOCA) exam scores and 168 primary data collected using a 30-item questionnaire regarding stroke knowledge. The data obtained was then analyzed descriptively and the result was categorized into 3 levels of knowledge: Good, moderate, and poor. Results: Each variable demonstrates a varying degree of knowledge. However, based on the total scores and averages collected from both the questionnaire and the SOOCA exam, most of the students had a moderate level of knowledge regarding ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke. Conclusion: Most of the students had a moderate level of knowledge about stroke, so educational interventions and student’s capabilities improvement are required to increase knowledge of stroke.
{"title":"THE LEVEL OF KNOWLEDGE AMONG UNDERGRADUATE MEDICAL STUDENTS ABOUT STROKE","authors":"Rita Arsika Fauziah, L. Amalia, Nandina Oktavia, L. E. Rakhmilla","doi":"10.22146/jpki.67942","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22146/jpki.67942","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Stroke is a neurological emergency that requires prompt and precise diagnosis and treatment. However, errors in diagnosis and treatment are still frequently seen. One of the main causes of this problem is the lack of doctors’ knowledge. This study aims to determine the level of knowledge among undergraduate medical students about stroke. The results of this study can be used as basic information to provide educational interventions to medical students to prevent and minimize the occurrence of medical errors. Methods: This study used a quantitative-descriptive method with a cross-sectional approach. The study subjects were third-semester medical undergraduate students at the Medical Faculty of Padjadjaran University during the 2018/2019 academic year. Samples were 43 secondary data collected from ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke Students Objective Oral Case Analysis (SOOCA) exam scores and 168 primary data collected using a 30-item questionnaire regarding stroke knowledge. The data obtained was then analyzed descriptively and the result was categorized into 3 levels of knowledge: Good, moderate, and poor. Results: Each variable demonstrates a varying degree of knowledge. However, based on the total scores and averages collected from both the questionnaire and the SOOCA exam, most of the students had a moderate level of knowledge regarding ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke. Conclusion: Most of the students had a moderate level of knowledge about stroke, so educational interventions and student’s capabilities improvement are required to increase knowledge of stroke.","PeriodicalId":17805,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia: The Indonesian Journal of Medical Education","volume":"76 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"82130302","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Siti Rokhmah Projosasmito, R. Riskiyana, S. Supriyati
Background: Learning by experiencing a real situation is believed to be more powerful than using simulation. This hypothesis is also applied to interprofessional learning for students in health professions education. Learning to collaborate and practice students' knowledge of health care in a community became the purpose of the community and family health care (CFHC) program in the Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada.Aim: To describe the third-year students’ experiences of learning interprofessional collaboration in a community setting based on their activity report.Case Discussion: The CFHC team created a particular design for third-year students, focused on community health problems rather than family health problems. The groups conducted focus group discussions to explore health issues and to decide together with the community the main problem that would be given intervention. The groups documented the entire process through a written report, video, and an article about their intervention outcome.Conclusion: The reports showed that students were able to demonstrate interprofessional practice in solving health problems in the community. They learned to work as an interprofessional team while experiencing it. Thus, conducting community-based IPE for undergraduate students is necessary to develop interprofessional collaboration competencies.
{"title":"THIRD-YEAR HEALTH PROFESSIONS STUDENTS’ INTERPROFESSIONAL EDUCATION IN THE COMMUNITY SETTING: WHAT DID THEY EXPERIENCE?","authors":"Siti Rokhmah Projosasmito, R. Riskiyana, S. Supriyati","doi":"10.22146/jpki.67701","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22146/jpki.67701","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Learning by experiencing a real situation is believed to be more powerful than using simulation. This hypothesis is also applied to interprofessional learning for students in health professions education. Learning to collaborate and practice students' knowledge of health care in a community became the purpose of the community and family health care (CFHC) program in the Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada.Aim: To describe the third-year students’ experiences of learning interprofessional collaboration in a community setting based on their activity report.Case Discussion: The CFHC team created a particular design for third-year students, focused on community health problems rather than family health problems. The groups conducted focus group discussions to explore health issues and to decide together with the community the main problem that would be given intervention. The groups documented the entire process through a written report, video, and an article about their intervention outcome.Conclusion: The reports showed that students were able to demonstrate interprofessional practice in solving health problems in the community. They learned to work as an interprofessional team while experiencing it. Thus, conducting community-based IPE for undergraduate students is necessary to develop interprofessional collaboration competencies.","PeriodicalId":17805,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia: The Indonesian Journal of Medical Education","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"86431689","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Elizabeth Sulastri Nugraheni, D. Widyandana, R. Hidayah
Background: Medical students in private schools are mostly high school graduates, ages are around 17 to 18. They were so diverse, the background of the former school, culture, motivation, and study skills. Students from rural might have different motivation and study skills from students of big cities. To give autonomy support to the new medical students, we planned the motivational workshop and study skills mentoring. We assume those will increase their motivation.Aims: To know - What types of motivation do first-year medical students have? Secondly, to evaluate - Whether motivational workshops and mentoring about study strategies can help to increase students’ autonomous motivation based on the Self-Determination Theory.Methods: A mixed-methods research was conducted in this study. The first step was the quantitative study using the Academic Motivation Scale (AMS) to measure the students’ pre and post intervention motivation and the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory (IMI) post intervention, then followed by the qualitative study to capture students’ responses and reflections with convenience sample.Results: The autonomous motivation was high among the male students, home-schooling, does not belong to medical profession family, and students from lower middle income. Quantitative data showed that this approach significantly decreased the amotivation scale of participants (p=0.025). Descriptively, there was an increase in the autonomous motivation of participants after following motivational workshop and study strategies mentoring.Conclusion: Motivational workshops and mentoring on study strategies were found to be valuable, interesting, and facilitate autonomous motivation. Results showed that those activities increased the students’ autonomous motivation.
{"title":"DO AUTONOMY SUPPORTS IMPROVE MEDICAL STUDENTS’ MOTIVATION IN A DEVELOPING COUNTRY?","authors":"Elizabeth Sulastri Nugraheni, D. Widyandana, R. Hidayah","doi":"10.22146/jpki.67697","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22146/jpki.67697","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Medical students in private schools are mostly high school graduates, ages are around 17 to 18. They were so diverse, the background of the former school, culture, motivation, and study skills. Students from rural might have different motivation and study skills from students of big cities. To give autonomy support to the new medical students, we planned the motivational workshop and study skills mentoring. We assume those will increase their motivation.Aims: To know - What types of motivation do first-year medical students have? Secondly, to evaluate - Whether motivational workshops and mentoring about study strategies can help to increase students’ autonomous motivation based on the Self-Determination Theory.Methods: A mixed-methods research was conducted in this study. The first step was the quantitative study using the Academic Motivation Scale (AMS) to measure the students’ pre and post intervention motivation and the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory (IMI) post intervention, then followed by the qualitative study to capture students’ responses and reflections with convenience sample.Results: The autonomous motivation was high among the male students, home-schooling, does not belong to medical profession family, and students from lower middle income. Quantitative data showed that this approach significantly decreased the amotivation scale of participants (p=0.025). Descriptively, there was an increase in the autonomous motivation of participants after following motivational workshop and study strategies mentoring.Conclusion: Motivational workshops and mentoring on study strategies were found to be valuable, interesting, and facilitate autonomous motivation. Results showed that those activities increased the students’ autonomous motivation.","PeriodicalId":17805,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia: The Indonesian Journal of Medical Education","volume":"83 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"85963192","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Burnout is common among medical residents, and a non-commercial tool for assessing burnout for medical residents is needed. This study aimed to adapt the Oldenburg Burnout Inventory (OLBI) in Bahasa Indonesia for medical residents and to analyze its validity and reliability.Case Discussion: The English version of OLBI was forward and backward translated to and from Bahasa Indonesia by English-language translation experts, and was appropriately modified by the authors. The respondents of the questionnaire were taken from pediatric residents in the first trial (48 subjects), and from internal medicine, pediatric, dermatology, surgery, and neurology residents in the second trial (109 subjects). The item-test correlation to measured construct validity was good for both trials. A confirmatory factor analysis was then undertaken to evaluate the goodness of fit (GOF), the root mean squared error of approximation (RMSEA), comparative fit index (CFI), Tucker-Lewis index (TLI), standardized root mean squared residual (SRMR), and coefficient of determination (CD) in the second trial. The results of the one-factor model and multidimensional GOF of the 16 items were unsatisfactory (χ2<0.05 and RMSEA>0.08). The GOF of the two-factor analysis of burnout with 8 items (3 exhaustion items and 5 disengagement items) created the following results: χ2=0.378; RMSEA=0.025; CFI=0.995; TLI=0.993; SRMR=0.036; and CD=0.898. The Cronbach’s alphas, for internal consistency reliability, in the first trial, second trial, and final model were 0.73, 0.87, 0.83, and 0.79, respectively.Conclusion: An 8-items modified Bahasa Indonesia translation of the OLBI for medical residents to measure burnout has good reliability and validity.
{"title":"ADAPTING THE OLDENBURG BURNOUT INVENTORY INTO BAHASA INDONESIA FOR MEASURING BURNOUT IN MEDICAL RESIDENTS","authors":"A. Moelyo, M. Hanafi","doi":"10.22146/jpki.56213","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22146/jpki.56213","url":null,"abstract":" Background: Burnout is common among medical residents, and a non-commercial tool for assessing burnout for medical residents is needed. This study aimed to adapt the Oldenburg Burnout Inventory (OLBI) in Bahasa Indonesia for medical residents and to analyze its validity and reliability.Case Discussion: The English version of OLBI was forward and backward translated to and from Bahasa Indonesia by English-language translation experts, and was appropriately modified by the authors. The respondents of the questionnaire were taken from pediatric residents in the first trial (48 subjects), and from internal medicine, pediatric, dermatology, surgery, and neurology residents in the second trial (109 subjects). The item-test correlation to measured construct validity was good for both trials. A confirmatory factor analysis was then undertaken to evaluate the goodness of fit (GOF), the root mean squared error of approximation (RMSEA), comparative fit index (CFI), Tucker-Lewis index (TLI), standardized root mean squared residual (SRMR), and coefficient of determination (CD) in the second trial. The results of the one-factor model and multidimensional GOF of the 16 items were unsatisfactory (χ2<0.05 and RMSEA>0.08). The GOF of the two-factor analysis of burnout with 8 items (3 exhaustion items and 5 disengagement items) created the following results: χ2=0.378; RMSEA=0.025; CFI=0.995; TLI=0.993; SRMR=0.036; and CD=0.898. The Cronbach’s alphas, for internal consistency reliability, in the first trial, second trial, and final model were 0.73, 0.87, 0.83, and 0.79, respectively.Conclusion: An 8-items modified Bahasa Indonesia translation of the OLBI for medical residents to measure burnout has good reliability and validity. ","PeriodicalId":17805,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia: The Indonesian Journal of Medical Education","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"91523530","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Hikmawati Nurrokhmanti,, A. P. Susilo, R. Indah, M. Claramita
Background: Communication skills are the core skills throughout medical professional life and embedded with cultural factors. Although students have learned communication skills in the undergraduate education, adequate training during clinical rotation and continuing professional development is necessary. Facilitating the students to build partnership relationship in the communicating with patients is challenging, considering its contexts, facilities, and opportunities. The influence of student-teacher relations in this hierarchical context is also influential. Gaps: Facilitating partnership communication skill requires blending two paradigms: medical knowledge and communication. These complex skills can be optimally facilitated by using specific strategies such as role-play, simulated patient (SP), and real-case encounter. Thus, the communication skills curriculum needs a comprehensive program planning, preparation on the students’ ability to be able to receive feedback and reflect upon it, simulated patients’ contribution for students training, and teachers to provide effective feedback.Recommendation: Facilitating students' communication skills needs 'two to tango,' combining between mastery of medical knowledge and partnership communication. A better communication curriculum should consider incorporating cultural competencies and applying the principles in effective training course design such as authenticity, variability, gradually from simple to complex, integrated, and scaffolding by specific evidence. Thus, should be supported by a good faculty development program that will facilitate safe environment and constructive feedback. In addition, the need for simulated patients or even now, a virtual patient, is inevitable.
{"title":"COMMUNICATION SKILLS: FACILITATING STUDENTS’ INVISIBLE BUT SIGNIFICANT SKILLS TO IMPROVE HEALTH OUTCOMES","authors":"Hikmawati Nurrokhmanti,, A. P. Susilo, R. Indah, M. Claramita","doi":"10.22146/jpki.72137","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22146/jpki.72137","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Communication skills are the core skills throughout medical professional life and embedded with cultural factors. Although students have learned communication skills in the undergraduate education, adequate training during clinical rotation and continuing professional development is necessary. Facilitating the students to build partnership relationship in the communicating with patients is challenging, considering its contexts, facilities, and opportunities. The influence of student-teacher relations in this hierarchical context is also influential. Gaps: Facilitating partnership communication skill requires blending two paradigms: medical knowledge and communication. These complex skills can be optimally facilitated by using specific strategies such as role-play, simulated patient (SP), and real-case encounter. Thus, the communication skills curriculum needs a comprehensive program planning, preparation on the students’ ability to be able to receive feedback and reflect upon it, simulated patients’ contribution for students training, and teachers to provide effective feedback.Recommendation: Facilitating students' communication skills needs 'two to tango,' combining between mastery of medical knowledge and partnership communication. A better communication curriculum should consider incorporating cultural competencies and applying the principles in effective training course design such as authenticity, variability, gradually from simple to complex, integrated, and scaffolding by specific evidence. Thus, should be supported by a good faculty development program that will facilitate safe environment and constructive feedback. In addition, the need for simulated patients or even now, a virtual patient, is inevitable.","PeriodicalId":17805,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia: The Indonesian Journal of Medical Education","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"82786721","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Cindy Leona Wangsa, N. Prastowo, Veronica Dwi Jani Juliawati, Francisca Tjhay
Background: Every person has a different diurnal preference, sleep-wake cycle, and alertness known as chronotype. There are three chronotypes, that is morning, evening, and intermediate type. Medical students with evening chronotype are still forced to follow the standard academic schedule in the morning, hence their sleep time is reduced. This problem results in lower grade points since sleep quality affects academic achievement. This study aimed to analyze the difference in grade points between morning and evening chronotypes among medical students.Methods: A comparative cross-sectional study was performed among 102 preclinical students class 2018 of School Medicine and Health Sciences of Atma Jaya Catholic University Indonesia. All personal data, grade points, and chronotypes were taken using google form. Chronotypes and sleep characteristics were determined with Munich ChronoType Questionnaire (MCTQ) by calculating weekend mid-sleep time and sleep debt. Unpaired t-test and binary logistic regression were used to analyze the statistical significance.Results: The results of evening chronotype 44.1% respondents, morning chronotype 31.4% respondents, and intermediate chronotype 24.5% respondents were obtained from 102 respondents. There were 65.7% of students with grade points greater than or equal to three and 34.4% lower than three. There was no significant difference in grade points between morning and evening chronotypes on semester 1, 2, 3, nor grade point average 3 (p>0.05). Conclusion: There is no significant difference in grade points between morning and evening chronotypes among preclinical students class 2018 of School Medicine and Health Sciences Atma Jaya Catholic University of Indonesia.
{"title":"THE DIFFERENCE IN GRADE POINTS BETWEEN MORNING AND EVENING CHRONOTYPES AMONG PRECLINICAL MEDICAL STUDENTS","authors":"Cindy Leona Wangsa, N. Prastowo, Veronica Dwi Jani Juliawati, Francisca Tjhay","doi":"10.22146/jpki.65919","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22146/jpki.65919","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Every person has a different diurnal preference, sleep-wake cycle, and alertness known as chronotype. There are three chronotypes, that is morning, evening, and intermediate type. Medical students with evening chronotype are still forced to follow the standard academic schedule in the morning, hence their sleep time is reduced. This problem results in lower grade points since sleep quality affects academic achievement. This study aimed to analyze the difference in grade points between morning and evening chronotypes among medical students.Methods: A comparative cross-sectional study was performed among 102 preclinical students class 2018 of School Medicine and Health Sciences of Atma Jaya Catholic University Indonesia. All personal data, grade points, and chronotypes were taken using google form. Chronotypes and sleep characteristics were determined with Munich ChronoType Questionnaire (MCTQ) by calculating weekend mid-sleep time and sleep debt. Unpaired t-test and binary logistic regression were used to analyze the statistical significance.Results: The results of evening chronotype 44.1% respondents, morning chronotype 31.4% respondents, and intermediate chronotype 24.5% respondents were obtained from 102 respondents. There were 65.7% of students with grade points greater than or equal to three and 34.4% lower than three. There was no significant difference in grade points between morning and evening chronotypes on semester 1, 2, 3, nor grade point average 3 (p>0.05). Conclusion: There is no significant difference in grade points between morning and evening chronotypes among preclinical students class 2018 of School Medicine and Health Sciences Atma Jaya Catholic University of Indonesia.","PeriodicalId":17805,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia: The Indonesian Journal of Medical Education","volume":"57 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"81094198","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Nikla Sekar Salsabila, Kurnia Wahyudi, Y. Pratiwi, E. Ariyanto, A. Achadiyani
Background: In 2019, there were three admission pathways in the Faculty of Medicine Universitas Padjadjaran (FMUP), which were SNMPTN (Seleksi Nasional Masuk Perguruan Tinggi Negeri), SBMPTN (Seleksi Bersama Masuk Perguruan Tinggi Negeri), and Seleksi Mandiri Universitas Padjadjaran (SMUP). SNMPTN was based on previous academic achievements in senior high school. SBMPTN was held through a highly competitive national examination, while SMUP was conducted through the test held by Universitas Padjadjaran. In their first year, batch 2019 students had to adapt to college life, and also to the transition into distance learning due to the COVID-19 pandemic. This study aimed to know whether types of student admission selection contribute to academic achievements of the first-year students in the Hemato-immunology system (HIS), where the learning process was held during the transition into distance learning.Methods: This study compared the academic achievement of first-year students (batch 2019) on the second semester’s second half, using their HIS Multidisciplinary Examination (MDE) scores, for three selection methods. The data were 256 MDE scores of those students. Statistical analysis was performed using One Way ANOVA test, followed by Post-hoc Tukey test.Results: There was a statistically significant difference of HIS MDE scores for each selection method. The highest mean was by SNMPTN group (68.29+10.44), followed by SBMPTN group (64.90+11.29) and SMUP group (63.25+9.95).Conclusion: Students of SNMPTN group, who were selected based on previous academic achievements in senior high school, had higher HIS MDE scores than the other groups.
背景:2019年，Padjadjaran大学医学院(FMUP)有三个入学途径，分别是SNMPTN (Seleksi Nasional Masuk Perguruan Tinggi Negeri)、SBMPTN (Seleksi Bersama Masuk Perguruan Tinggi Negeri)和Seleksi Mandiri Universitas Padjadjaran (SMUP)。SNMPTN是基于以前的高中学业成绩。SBMPTN是通过竞争激烈的国家考试进行的，而SMUP是通过Padjadjaran大学举行的考试进行的。在第一年，2019届学生必须适应大学生活，也要适应因新冠肺炎大流行而过渡到远程学习。本研究旨在了解学生入学选择类型是否有助于血液免疫学系统(HIS)一年级学生的学业成绩，在向远程学习过渡的过程中，学习过程是进行的。方法:本研究采用三种选择方法，比较2019届一年级学生在第二学期下半年的学业成绩，采用HIS多学科考试(MDE)成绩。数据为这些学生的256个MDE分数。统计学分析采用单因素方差分析(One - Way ANOVA)，再进行Post-hoc Tukey检验。结果:各选择方法的HIS MDE评分差异均有统计学意义。平均评分最高的是SNMPTN组(68.29+10.44)，其次是SBMPTN组(64.90+11.29)和SMUP组(63.25+9.95)。结论:基于高中学业成绩选拔的SNMPTN组学生HIS MDE得分高于其他组。
{"title":"THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN TYPES OF ADMISSION SELECTION AND ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT IN THE FIRST-YEAR STUDENTS DURING THE TRANSITION TO DISTANCE LEARNING DUE TO COVID-19 PANDEMIC","authors":"Nikla Sekar Salsabila, Kurnia Wahyudi, Y. Pratiwi, E. Ariyanto, A. Achadiyani","doi":"10.22146/jpki.64464","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22146/jpki.64464","url":null,"abstract":"Background: In 2019, there were three admission pathways in the Faculty of Medicine Universitas Padjadjaran (FMUP), which were SNMPTN (Seleksi Nasional Masuk Perguruan Tinggi Negeri), SBMPTN (Seleksi Bersama Masuk Perguruan Tinggi Negeri), and Seleksi Mandiri Universitas Padjadjaran (SMUP). SNMPTN was based on previous academic achievements in senior high school. SBMPTN was held through a highly competitive national examination, while SMUP was conducted through the test held by Universitas Padjadjaran. In their first year, batch 2019 students had to adapt to college life, and also to the transition into distance learning due to the COVID-19 pandemic. This study aimed to know whether types of student admission selection contribute to academic achievements of the first-year students in the Hemato-immunology system (HIS), where the learning process was held during the transition into distance learning.Methods: This study compared the academic achievement of first-year students (batch 2019) on the second semester’s second half, using their HIS Multidisciplinary Examination (MDE) scores, for three selection methods. The data were 256 MDE scores of those students. Statistical analysis was performed using One Way ANOVA test, followed by Post-hoc Tukey test.Results: There was a statistically significant difference of HIS MDE scores for each selection method. The highest mean was by SNMPTN group (68.29+10.44), followed by SBMPTN group (64.90+11.29) and SMUP group (63.25+9.95).Conclusion: Students of SNMPTN group, who were selected based on previous academic achievements in senior high school, had higher HIS MDE scores than the other groups. ","PeriodicalId":17805,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia: The Indonesian Journal of Medical Education","volume":"138 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"79771462","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Adolescence is a time of significant psychosocial and physiological changes, such as changes in the reactivity of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, which causes an increase in stress-induced hormonal responses. Mental health disorders in medical students are often reported. Moreover, during the COVID-19 pandemic, most medical schools have changed the pre-clinical learning curriculum to online learning, hence most of the student's needs cannot be fulfilled. This study aims to determine the overview of the stress level among undergraduate medical students in Indonesia on exposure to online learning.Methods: This research uses a descriptive cross-sectional design. The primary data was taken with Medical Student Stressor Questionnaire, with undergraduate medical students, especially semester III-VII, as the target population. The minimal population was calculated using a stratified random sampling technique. Data were analyzed using the descriptive method.Results: In this study, most of the students experienced moderate stress (49.1%). Based on their age, the highest stress level was found in students aged 20 years (37%). Based on their gender, a higher stress level was found in female students (61.1%), compared to male students (38.9%). Based on the year, the highest stress level was found in the class of 2019 students (35.2%).Conclusion: Most of the students of the Faculty of Medicine in Indonesia experienced moderate stress during online learning. There is no significant difference between the stress levels of undergraduate medical students before and after the implementation of the online learning system
{"title":"STRESS LEVELS AMONG UNDERGRADUATE MEDICAL STUDENTS ON EXPOSURE TO ONLINE LEARNING","authors":"Sanian Inama, Y. Sarastri","doi":"10.22146/jpki.64507","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22146/jpki.64507","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Adolescence is a time of significant psychosocial and physiological changes, such as changes in the reactivity of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, which causes an increase in stress-induced hormonal responses. Mental health disorders in medical students are often reported. Moreover, during the COVID-19 pandemic, most medical schools have changed the pre-clinical learning curriculum to online learning, hence most of the student's needs cannot be fulfilled. This study aims to determine the overview of the stress level among undergraduate medical students in Indonesia on exposure to online learning.Methods: This research uses a descriptive cross-sectional design. The primary data was taken with Medical Student Stressor Questionnaire, with undergraduate medical students, especially semester III-VII, as the target population. The minimal population was calculated using a stratified random sampling technique. Data were analyzed using the descriptive method.Results: In this study, most of the students experienced moderate stress (49.1%). Based on their age, the highest stress level was found in students aged 20 years (37%). Based on their gender, a higher stress level was found in female students (61.1%), compared to male students (38.9%). Based on the year, the highest stress level was found in the class of 2019 students (35.2%).Conclusion: Most of the students of the Faculty of Medicine in Indonesia experienced moderate stress during online learning. There is no significant difference between the stress levels of undergraduate medical students before and after the implementation of the online learning system","PeriodicalId":17805,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia: The Indonesian Journal of Medical Education","volume":"45 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"78281888","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Interview is the most frequent data collection method utilized in qualitative research. It is used to explore perceptions and/or life experiences of participants related to a particular research topic. When a research investigates a traumatic topic, participants may show sensitive reactions. However, there is scant literature talks about these reactions and how researchers dealt with them, especially in Indonesian context. This case study aims to discuss the author’s experiences interviewing sensitive participants and ways she overcame dilemmas of stopping the interview or continuing it with caution.Case discussion: The case study draws on reflective practices during interviewing 21 disaster-affected participants in a larger ethnographic study exploring medical education in Aceh, Indonesia, inspired by methodological memos written during data collection processes. Sensitive participants may offer three sensitive reactions: 1) Refuse to do interview, 2) regret the interview after revealing many traumatic experiences, 3) show negative symptoms such as crying during the interview. In dealing with these sensitive reactions, researchers may implement strategies, such as 1) conducting interview at a proper time, 2) avoiding ‘normalization’, 3) putting emotion provoking questions at the last part of an interview, 4) applying communication approaches, such as CARE communication dan 3L actions (Look, Listen, and Link), 5) offering participants some alternative ways to do interviews.Conclusion: The findings suggest researchers exploring traumatic topics to prepare themselves with various interpersonal communication skills that are useful in showing acceptance toward sensitive reactions of their participants.
{"title":"QUALITATIVE INTERVIEW WITH SENSITIVE PARTIPANTS","authors":"R. Indah","doi":"10.22146/jpki.64308","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22146/jpki.64308","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Interview is the most frequent data collection method utilized in qualitative research. It is used to explore perceptions and/or life experiences of participants related to a particular research topic. When a research investigates a traumatic topic, participants may show sensitive reactions. However, there is scant literature talks about these reactions and how researchers dealt with them, especially in Indonesian context. This case study aims to discuss the author’s experiences interviewing sensitive participants and ways she overcame dilemmas of stopping the interview or continuing it with caution.Case discussion: The case study draws on reflective practices during interviewing 21 disaster-affected participants in a larger ethnographic study exploring medical education in Aceh, Indonesia, inspired by methodological memos written during data collection processes. Sensitive participants may offer three sensitive reactions: 1) Refuse to do interview, 2) regret the interview after revealing many traumatic experiences, 3) show negative symptoms such as crying during the interview. In dealing with these sensitive reactions, researchers may implement strategies, such as 1) conducting interview at a proper time, 2) avoiding ‘normalization’, 3) putting emotion provoking questions at the last part of an interview, 4) applying communication approaches, such as CARE communication dan 3L actions (Look, Listen, and Link), 5) offering participants some alternative ways to do interviews.Conclusion: The findings suggest researchers exploring traumatic topics to prepare themselves with various interpersonal communication skills that are useful in showing acceptance toward sensitive reactions of their participants. ","PeriodicalId":17805,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia: The Indonesian Journal of Medical Education","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"75065075","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：