Pub Date : 2024-10-01DOI: 10.1007/s00423-024-03486-7
Luigi Marzano
Background: Hypertension resolution following adrenalectomy in patients with primary aldosteronism (PA) remains a critical clinical challenge. Identifying preoperatively which patients will become normotensive is both a priority and a point of contention. In this narrative review, we explore the controversies and unresolved issues surrounding the prediction of hypertension resolution after adrenalectomy in PA.
Methods: A comprehensive literature review was conducted, focusing on studies published between 1954 and 2024 that evaluated all studies that discussed predictive models for hypertension resolution post-adrenalectomy in PA patients. Databases searched included MEDLINE®, Ovid Embase, and Web of Science databases.
Results: The review identified several predictors and predictive models of hypertension resolution, including female sex, duration of hypertension, antihypertensive medication, and BMI. However, inconsistencies in study designs and patient populations led to varied conclusions.
Conclusions: Although certain predictors and predictive models of hypertension resolution post-adrenalectomy in PA patients are supported by evidence, significant controversies and unresolved issues remain. While the current predictive models provide valuable insights, there is a clear need for further research in this area. Future studies should focus on validating and refining these models.
背景:原发性醛固酮增多症(PA)患者肾上腺切除术后的高血压缓解仍是一项严峻的临床挑战。术前确定哪些患者的血压会恢复正常既是当务之急,也是争议焦点。在这篇叙述性综述中,我们探讨了有关预测 PA 患者肾上腺切除术后高血压缓解的争议和未决问题:我们进行了全面的文献综述,重点关注 1954 年至 2024 年间发表的研究,评估了所有讨论 PA 患者肾上腺切除术后高血压缓解预测模型的研究。检索的数据库包括 MEDLINE®、Ovid Embase 和 Web of Science 数据库:结果:综述发现了几种高血压缓解的预测因素和预测模型,包括女性性别、高血压持续时间、抗高血压药物和体重指数。然而,研究设计和患者人群的不一致导致了不同的结论:结论:虽然 PA 患者肾上腺切除术后高血压缓解的某些预测因素和预测模型有证据支持,但仍存在重大争议和未解决的问题。虽然目前的预测模型提供了有价值的见解,但该领域显然需要进一步研究。未来的研究应侧重于验证和完善这些模型。
{"title":"Predicting the resolution of hypertension following adrenalectomy in primary aldosteronism: Controversies and unresolved issues a narrative review.","authors":"Luigi Marzano","doi":"10.1007/s00423-024-03486-7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-024-03486-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hypertension resolution following adrenalectomy in patients with primary aldosteronism (PA) remains a critical clinical challenge. Identifying preoperatively which patients will become normotensive is both a priority and a point of contention. In this narrative review, we explore the controversies and unresolved issues surrounding the prediction of hypertension resolution after adrenalectomy in PA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive literature review was conducted, focusing on studies published between 1954 and 2024 that evaluated all studies that discussed predictive models for hypertension resolution post-adrenalectomy in PA patients. Databases searched included MEDLINE®, Ovid Embase, and Web of Science databases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The review identified several predictors and predictive models of hypertension resolution, including female sex, duration of hypertension, antihypertensive medication, and BMI. However, inconsistencies in study designs and patient populations led to varied conclusions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although certain predictors and predictive models of hypertension resolution post-adrenalectomy in PA patients are supported by evidence, significant controversies and unresolved issues remain. While the current predictive models provide valuable insights, there is a clear need for further research in this area. Future studies should focus on validating and refining these models.</p>","PeriodicalId":17983,"journal":{"name":"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery","volume":"409 1","pages":"295"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142361732","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Purpose: Endoscopic thyroidectomy utilizing the Gasless Unilateral Axillary Approach (GUA) offers distinct advantages including clear visibility, simple manipulation, safe oncological outcomes. This technique eliminates postoperative neck scarring, ensures concealed surgical incisions, and minimizes postoperative swallowing discomfort.
Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 150 surgical videos to document key anatomical features and their variations during this procedure.
Results: The GUA endoscopic thyroidectomy, which approaches from the contralateral side, presents significant difficulties in identifying anatomical structures, especially anatomical abnormalities in the contralateral neck, while constructing feasible operative fields. This article offers an in-depth discussion of the anatomical challenges, pitfalls, and viable strategies associated with this surgery, particularly for less experienced surgeons.
Conclusions: Given the intricate interplay of muscular, vascular, and neural anatomical structures, novices in surgery must be well-acquainted with the underlying anatomy to minimize potential complications.
{"title":"Key points of surgical anatomy for endoscopic thyroidectomy via a gasless unilateral axillary approach.","authors":"Kexin Meng, Ying Xin, Zhuo Tan, Jiajie Xu, Xiaoliang Chen, Jincong Gu, Parikh Nikhilkumar Jagadishbhai, Chuanming Zheng","doi":"10.1007/s00423-024-03473-y","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00423-024-03473-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Endoscopic thyroidectomy utilizing the Gasless Unilateral Axillary Approach (GUA) offers distinct advantages including clear visibility, simple manipulation, safe oncological outcomes. This technique eliminates postoperative neck scarring, ensures concealed surgical incisions, and minimizes postoperative swallowing discomfort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed 150 surgical videos to document key anatomical features and their variations during this procedure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The GUA endoscopic thyroidectomy, which approaches from the contralateral side, presents significant difficulties in identifying anatomical structures, especially anatomical abnormalities in the contralateral neck, while constructing feasible operative fields. This article offers an in-depth discussion of the anatomical challenges, pitfalls, and viable strategies associated with this surgery, particularly for less experienced surgeons.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Given the intricate interplay of muscular, vascular, and neural anatomical structures, novices in surgery must be well-acquainted with the underlying anatomy to minimize potential complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":17983,"journal":{"name":"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery","volume":"409 1","pages":"294"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11442671/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142349377","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-30DOI: 10.1007/s00423-024-03480-z
Anouk Wurth, Thilo Hackert, Dittmar Böckler, Manuel Feisst, Sabine Haag, Markus A Weigand, Thorsten Brenner, Thomas Schmoch
Purpose: Even today, it remains a challenge for healthcare professionals to decide whether a clinically stable patient who is recovering from uncomplicated medium or major surgery would benefit from a postoperative intensive care unit (ICU) admission, or whether they would be at least as adequately cared for by a few hours of monitoring in the post-operative care unit (PACU).
Methods: In this monocentric retrospective observational study, all adult patients who (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin (DGAI) in Anästh Intensivmed (50):S486-S489, 2009) underwent medium or major surgery between 1 January 1 2014 and 31 December 2018 at the Heidelberg University Surgical Center, and (Vimlati et al. in Eur J Anaesthesiol September 26(9):715-721, 2009) were monitored for 1-12 h in the PACU, and then (De Pietri et al. in World J Gastroenterol 20(9):2304-23207, 2014) transferred to a normal ward (NW) immediately thereafter were included. At the end of the PACU stay, each patient was cleared by both a surgeon and an anesthesiologist to be transferred to a NW. The first objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of relevant early complications (RECs) within the first 24 h on a normal ward. The secondary objective was to determine the prevalence of RECs in the subgroup of included patients who underwent partial pancreaticoduodenectomy.
Results: A total of 10,273 patients were included in this study. The prevalence of RECs was 0.50% (confidence interval [CI] 0.40-0.60%), with the median length of stay in the PACU before the patient's first transfer to a NW being 285 min (interquartile range 210-360 min). In the subgroup of patients who underwent partial pancreaticoduodenectomy (n = 740), REC prevalence was 1.1% (CI = 0.55-2.12%).
Conclusion: Based on a medical case-by-case assessment, it is possible to select patients who after a PACU stay of only up to 12 h have a low risk of emergency readmission to an ICU within the 24 h following the transfer to the NW. Continued research will be needed to further improve transfer decisions in such low-risk subgroups.
目的:时至今日,对于医护人员来说,如何决定临床稳定的中型或大型手术后恢复期患者是否需要入住术后重症监护室(ICU),或者是否在术后监护室(PACU)接受数小时的监护至少也能获得同样充分的护理,仍然是一项挑战:在这项单中心回顾性观察研究中,2014年1月1日至2018年12月31日期间在海德堡大学外科中心接受中型或大型手术的所有成人患者(Deutsche Gesellschaft für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin (DGAI) in Anästh Intensivmed (50):S486-S489, 2009),以及(Vimlati et al.in Eur J Anaesthesiol September 26(9):715-721, 2009)在PACU监护1-12小时,随后(De Pietri et al. in World J Gastroenterol 20(9):2304-23207, 2014)立即转入普通病房(NW)的患者纳入。在 PACU 留观结束时,每位患者均由外科医生和麻醉师批准转入 NW。本研究的首要目标是确定在普通病房的头 24 小时内相关早期并发症 (REC) 的发生率。次要目标是确定接受胰十二指肠部分切除术的亚组患者中相关早期并发症的发生率:本研究共纳入了 10273 名患者。RECs的发生率为0.50%(置信区间[CI] 0.40-0.60%),患者首次转入NW之前在PACU的中位住院时间为285分钟(四分位距为210-360分钟)。在接受胰十二指肠部分切除术的亚组患者(n = 740)中,REC发生率为1.1%(CI = 0.55-2.12%):结论:根据逐个病例的医疗评估,可以选择在PACU停留不超过12小时的患者,这些患者在转入NW后的24小时内再次紧急入住ICU的风险较低。要进一步改进此类低风险亚组的转院决策,还需要继续开展研究。
{"title":"Prevalence of relevant early complications during the first 24 h on a normal ward in patients following PACU care after medium and major surgery: a monocentric retrospective observational study.","authors":"Anouk Wurth, Thilo Hackert, Dittmar Böckler, Manuel Feisst, Sabine Haag, Markus A Weigand, Thorsten Brenner, Thomas Schmoch","doi":"10.1007/s00423-024-03480-z","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00423-024-03480-z","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Even today, it remains a challenge for healthcare professionals to decide whether a clinically stable patient who is recovering from uncomplicated medium or major surgery would benefit from a postoperative intensive care unit (ICU) admission, or whether they would be at least as adequately cared for by a few hours of monitoring in the post-operative care unit (PACU).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this monocentric retrospective observational study, all adult patients who (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin (DGAI) in Anästh Intensivmed (50):S486-S489, 2009) underwent medium or major surgery between 1 January 1 2014 and 31 December 2018 at the Heidelberg University Surgical Center, and (Vimlati et al. in Eur J Anaesthesiol September 26(9):715-721, 2009) were monitored for 1-12 h in the PACU, and then (De Pietri et al. in World J Gastroenterol 20(9):2304-23207, 2014) transferred to a normal ward (NW) immediately thereafter were included. At the end of the PACU stay, each patient was cleared by both a surgeon and an anesthesiologist to be transferred to a NW. The first objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of relevant early complications (RECs) within the first 24 h on a normal ward. The secondary objective was to determine the prevalence of RECs in the subgroup of included patients who underwent partial pancreaticoduodenectomy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 10,273 patients were included in this study. The prevalence of RECs was 0.50% (confidence interval [CI] 0.40-0.60%), with the median length of stay in the PACU before the patient's first transfer to a NW being 285 min (interquartile range 210-360 min). In the subgroup of patients who underwent partial pancreaticoduodenectomy (n = 740), REC prevalence was 1.1% (CI = 0.55-2.12%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on a medical case-by-case assessment, it is possible to select patients who after a PACU stay of only up to 12 h have a low risk of emergency readmission to an ICU within the 24 h following the transfer to the NW. Continued research will be needed to further improve transfer decisions in such low-risk subgroups.</p>","PeriodicalId":17983,"journal":{"name":"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery","volume":"409 1","pages":"293"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11442648/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142349379","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-28DOI: 10.1007/s00423-024-03479-6
Mohamed Abuahmed, Rahel Rashid
Background: Day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy (DCLC) has gained traction globally due to its benefits, including shorter hospital stays, reduced costs, and enhanced patient experience. While concerns about patient safety, particularly related to bleeding and bile duct injury persist, the literature supports the efficacy and advantages of DCLC highlighting the need for its wider adoption in healthcare settings to optimise resources and improve patient outcomes.
Methods: This was a literature review that aims to assess the feasibility and safety of day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy for symptomatic gallstone patients, focusing on incidence and aetiology of unexpected admissions and readmissions, as well as conversion-to-open rates. PubMed was searched for all studies focusing on DCLC between 2014 and 2024. The timeframe was specifically selected to identify recent trends and practices in this evolving field. By focusing on this specific period, the review aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of current practices, emerging trends, and the evolving standard of care in this area.
Results: This review highlights that the main causes of unexpected admission post DCLC were postoperative nausea, vomiting, and pain, while the implementation of anaesthetic pathways notably increased day-case rates. Studies addressing complication rates postoperatively consistently found no significant difference between day-case and in-patient procedures.
Conclusions: DCLC for symptomatic gallstone patients is supported by research as safe and effective, with high success rates and patient satisfaction. Studies show minimal complications and acceptable readmission rates, suggesting that DCLC can be the standard approach for selective patients, improving outcomes and healthcare efficiency.
{"title":"Day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the management of gallbladder disease: a literature review.","authors":"Mohamed Abuahmed, Rahel Rashid","doi":"10.1007/s00423-024-03479-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-024-03479-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy (DCLC) has gained traction globally due to its benefits, including shorter hospital stays, reduced costs, and enhanced patient experience. While concerns about patient safety, particularly related to bleeding and bile duct injury persist, the literature supports the efficacy and advantages of DCLC highlighting the need for its wider adoption in healthcare settings to optimise resources and improve patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a literature review that aims to assess the feasibility and safety of day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy for symptomatic gallstone patients, focusing on incidence and aetiology of unexpected admissions and readmissions, as well as conversion-to-open rates. PubMed was searched for all studies focusing on DCLC between 2014 and 2024. The timeframe was specifically selected to identify recent trends and practices in this evolving field. By focusing on this specific period, the review aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of current practices, emerging trends, and the evolving standard of care in this area.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This review highlights that the main causes of unexpected admission post DCLC were postoperative nausea, vomiting, and pain, while the implementation of anaesthetic pathways notably increased day-case rates. Studies addressing complication rates postoperatively consistently found no significant difference between day-case and in-patient procedures.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>DCLC for symptomatic gallstone patients is supported by research as safe and effective, with high success rates and patient satisfaction. Studies show minimal complications and acceptable readmission rates, suggesting that DCLC can be the standard approach for selective patients, improving outcomes and healthcare efficiency.</p>","PeriodicalId":17983,"journal":{"name":"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery","volume":"409 1","pages":"292"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142349375","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Purpose: Frailty is common in surgical patients and is closely associated with postoperative outcomes.
Aims: This study employed bibliometric methods to summarize and analyze research related to frailty and surgery, comprehensively analyzing the research structure and providing visualized maps.
Methods: This study analyzed the volume of publications, countries, institutions, authors, journals, references, and keywords related to perioperative frailty in the Web of Science Core Collection from 1978 to 2024. Visual bibliometric analyses were conducted from multiple perspectives, including collaboration networks, citation analysis, and keyword clustering.
Results: From 1978 to 2024, 21,879 authors from 95 countries and regions published 4,119 papers on perioperative frailty in 973 journals worldwide. The United States has the most publications, while Italy has the highest degree of international collaboration. The University of California System has the highest number of publications. The University of Kansas Medical Center is the institution with the highest centrality. The top nine authors in terms of publication volume are all from the USA. Bowers Christian A. is the most prolific author. The Journal of Vascular Surgery is the journal with the most publications. Current research directions include preoperative risk assessment of frailty, the relationship between frailty and postoperative complications, elderly frailty, and the relationship between frailty and sarcopenia. Research hotspots include risk stratification, postoperative delirium, the elderly, and sarcopenia.
Conclusion: This study has identified the research hotspots and trends in perioperative frailty. Our findings will enable researchers to understand this field's knowledge structure better and identify future research directions.
目的目的:本研究采用文献计量学方法总结和分析与虚弱和外科手术相关的研究,全面分析研究结构并提供可视化地图:本研究分析了1978年至2024年科学网核心藏书中与围手术期虚弱相关的出版物数量、国家、机构、作者、期刊、参考文献和关键词。从合作网络、引文分析和关键词聚类等多个角度进行了可视化文献计量分析:从1978年到2024年,来自95个国家和地区的21879位作者在全球973种期刊上发表了4119篇关于围手术期虚弱的论文。美国发表的论文最多,而意大利的国际合作程度最高。加利福尼亚大学系统发表的论文数量最多。堪萨斯大学医学中心是中心地位最高的机构。论文发表量排名前九位的作者均来自美国。Bowers Christian A. 是最多产的作者。血管外科杂志》是发表论文最多的杂志。目前的研究方向包括虚弱的术前风险评估、虚弱与术后并发症的关系、老年虚弱以及虚弱与肌肉疏松症的关系。研究热点包括风险分层、术后谵妄、老年人和肌肉疏松症:本研究确定了围手术期虚弱的研究热点和趋势。我们的研究结果将有助于研究人员更好地了解这一领域的知识结构,并确定未来的研究方向。
{"title":"Knowledge mapping of frailty and surgery: a bibliometric and visualized analysis.","authors":"Zhiwei Guo, Feifei Wang, Jiacheng Xu, Zhonggui Shan","doi":"10.1007/s00423-024-03477-8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-024-03477-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Frailty is common in surgical patients and is closely associated with postoperative outcomes.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study employed bibliometric methods to summarize and analyze research related to frailty and surgery, comprehensively analyzing the research structure and providing visualized maps.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study analyzed the volume of publications, countries, institutions, authors, journals, references, and keywords related to perioperative frailty in the Web of Science Core Collection from 1978 to 2024. Visual bibliometric analyses were conducted from multiple perspectives, including collaboration networks, citation analysis, and keyword clustering.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 1978 to 2024, 21,879 authors from 95 countries and regions published 4,119 papers on perioperative frailty in 973 journals worldwide. The United States has the most publications, while Italy has the highest degree of international collaboration. The University of California System has the highest number of publications. The University of Kansas Medical Center is the institution with the highest centrality. The top nine authors in terms of publication volume are all from the USA. Bowers Christian A. is the most prolific author. The Journal of Vascular Surgery is the journal with the most publications. Current research directions include preoperative risk assessment of frailty, the relationship between frailty and postoperative complications, elderly frailty, and the relationship between frailty and sarcopenia. Research hotspots include risk stratification, postoperative delirium, the elderly, and sarcopenia.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study has identified the research hotspots and trends in perioperative frailty. Our findings will enable researchers to understand this field's knowledge structure better and identify future research directions.</p>","PeriodicalId":17983,"journal":{"name":"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery","volume":"409 1","pages":"290"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11436438/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142349378","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-27DOI: 10.1007/s00423-024-03482-x
Ali Emre Atici, Ayşegul Bahar Ozocak, Ayse Eren Kayaci, Ecem Guclu Ozturk, Alper Kararmaz, Sevket Cumhur Yegen
Background: Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) is one of the most common reasons for morbidity after pancreatoduodenectomy. The technical characteristics of anastomosis that could be affected by surgeon may offer a relevant chance to improve postoperative DGE rates. We investigated the effect of a technical modification of gastrojejunostomy after the classical pancreaticoduodenectomy on DGE.
Materials and methods: A total of 161 patients underwent classical pancreaticoduodenectomy (with 20-40 percent antrectomy) due to pancreatic adenocarcinoma at the Department of General Surgery, Marmara University, School of Medicine Hospital, from February 2019 to May 2023, and those who met the inclusion criteria were enrolled. One hundred twenty patients had undergone classical end-to-side gastrojejunostomy (Classical GJ group), and 41 had undergone Marmara-Yegen cutting side-to-side gastrojejunostomy (M-Yc group). DGE was defined according to the International Working Group on Pancreatic Surgery, and postoperative DGE rates of both groups were compared. In addition, multivariate analysis was performed to identify possible independent predictive factors for DGE.
Results: The total incidence of DGE was 31% in the Classical GJ group and 17% in the (M-Yc group). Although there was no significant difference between the groups regarding DGE and DGE grades (p = 0.1), DGE was distinctly lower in the M-Yc GJ group. In multi-variant analysis, Clavien-Dindo grade 3a and above postoperative complication was determined as independent predictors for DGE.
Conclusions: We tried to explain the mechanism of DGE in terms of anatomical configuration. The incidence and severity of DGE decreased in patients who underwent M-Yc GJ.
{"title":"Impact of marmara-yegen cuttıng gastrojejunostomy on delayed gastrıc emptyıng after pancreatoduodenectomy: ınıtıal results.","authors":"Ali Emre Atici, Ayşegul Bahar Ozocak, Ayse Eren Kayaci, Ecem Guclu Ozturk, Alper Kararmaz, Sevket Cumhur Yegen","doi":"10.1007/s00423-024-03482-x","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-024-03482-x","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) is one of the most common reasons for morbidity after pancreatoduodenectomy. The technical characteristics of anastomosis that could be affected by surgeon may offer a relevant chance to improve postoperative DGE rates. We investigated the effect of a technical modification of gastrojejunostomy after the classical pancreaticoduodenectomy on DGE.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 161 patients underwent classical pancreaticoduodenectomy (with 20-40 percent antrectomy) due to pancreatic adenocarcinoma at the Department of General Surgery, Marmara University, School of Medicine Hospital, from February 2019 to May 2023, and those who met the inclusion criteria were enrolled. One hundred twenty patients had undergone classical end-to-side gastrojejunostomy (Classical GJ group), and 41 had undergone Marmara-Yegen cutting side-to-side gastrojejunostomy (M-Yc group). DGE was defined according to the International Working Group on Pancreatic Surgery, and postoperative DGE rates of both groups were compared. In addition, multivariate analysis was performed to identify possible independent predictive factors for DGE.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The total incidence of DGE was 31% in the Classical GJ group and 17% in the (M-Yc group). Although there was no significant difference between the groups regarding DGE and DGE grades (p = 0.1), DGE was distinctly lower in the M-Yc GJ group. In multi-variant analysis, Clavien-Dindo grade 3a and above postoperative complication was determined as independent predictors for DGE.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We tried to explain the mechanism of DGE in terms of anatomical configuration. The incidence and severity of DGE decreased in patients who underwent M-Yc GJ.</p>","PeriodicalId":17983,"journal":{"name":"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery","volume":"409 1","pages":"291"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142349376","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-24DOI: 10.1007/s00423-024-03475-w
Hossein Saboorifar, Mohammad Rahimi, Paria Babaahmadi, Asal Farokhzadeh, Morteza Behjat, Aidin Tarokhian
Objectives: This study aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of a support vector machine (SVM) algorithm for acute cholecystitis and evaluate its effectiveness in accurately diagnosing this condition.
Methods: Using a retrospective analysis of patient data from a single center, individuals with abdominal pain lasting one week or less were included. The SVM model was trained and optimized using standard procedures. Model performance was assessed through sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and AUC-ROC, with probability calibration evaluated using the Brier score.
Results: Among 534 patients, 198 (37.07%) were diagnosed with acute cholecystitis. The SVM model showed balanced performance, with a sensitivity of 83.08% (95% CI: 71.73-91.24%), a specificity of 80.21% (95% CI: 70.83-87.64%), and an accuracy of 81.37% (95% CI: 74.48-87.06%). The positive predictive value (PPV) was 73.97% (95% CI: 65.18-81.18%), the negative predictive value (NPV) was 87.50% (95% CI: 80.19-92.37%), and the AUC-ROC was 0.89 (95% CI: 0.85 to 0.93). The Brier score indicated well-calibrated probability estimates.
Conclusion: The SVM algorithm demonstrated promising potential for accurately diagnosing acute cholecystitis. Further refinement and validation are needed to enhance its reliability in clinical practice.
{"title":"Acute cholecystitis diagnosis in the emergency department: an artificial intelligence-based approach.","authors":"Hossein Saboorifar, Mohammad Rahimi, Paria Babaahmadi, Asal Farokhzadeh, Morteza Behjat, Aidin Tarokhian","doi":"10.1007/s00423-024-03475-w","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00423-024-03475-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of a support vector machine (SVM) algorithm for acute cholecystitis and evaluate its effectiveness in accurately diagnosing this condition.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a retrospective analysis of patient data from a single center, individuals with abdominal pain lasting one week or less were included. The SVM model was trained and optimized using standard procedures. Model performance was assessed through sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and AUC-ROC, with probability calibration evaluated using the Brier score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 534 patients, 198 (37.07%) were diagnosed with acute cholecystitis. The SVM model showed balanced performance, with a sensitivity of 83.08% (95% CI: 71.73-91.24%), a specificity of 80.21% (95% CI: 70.83-87.64%), and an accuracy of 81.37% (95% CI: 74.48-87.06%). The positive predictive value (PPV) was 73.97% (95% CI: 65.18-81.18%), the negative predictive value (NPV) was 87.50% (95% CI: 80.19-92.37%), and the AUC-ROC was 0.89 (95% CI: 0.85 to 0.93). The Brier score indicated well-calibrated probability estimates.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The SVM algorithm demonstrated promising potential for accurately diagnosing acute cholecystitis. Further refinement and validation are needed to enhance its reliability in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":17983,"journal":{"name":"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery","volume":"409 1","pages":"288"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142308033","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Purpose: It has reported that the prevalence of frailty in patients with pancreatic cancer is 45%. The number of patients with pancreatic cancer is increasing, and within this cohort, patients often suffer from impaired activities of daily living (ADLs). This study aimed to examine the association between perioperative Barthel Index (BI) scores, a validated measure of ADLs, and survival outcomes after pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer.
Methods: We analyzed the data of 201 patients who underwent pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer between 2010 and 2020. Preoperative and postoperative ADLs were assessed using the BI (range: 0-100; higher scores indicated greater independence). A preoperative or postoperative BI score ≤ 85 was defined as an impairment of perioperative ADLs. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to calculate the hazard ratios (HRs) after adjusting for potential confounders.
Results: Among the 201 patients, 14 (7.0%) had a preoperative BI score ≤ 85 and 50 (25%) had a postoperative BI score ≤ 85. Impairment of perioperative ADLs was independently associated with shorter overall survival (multivariable HR: 2.66, 95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 1.75-4.03, P < 0.001), cancer-specific survival (multivariable HR: 2.64, 95%CI: 1.15-4.25, P < 0.001), and recurrence-free survival (multivariable HR: 1.94, 95%CI: 1.08-3.50, P = 0.021).
Conclusion: Impairment of perioperative ADLs is associated with poor prognosis following pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer. The maintenance and improvement of perioperative ADLs could play an important role in providing favorable long-term outcomes in patients with pancreatic cancer.
目的:据报道,胰腺癌患者体弱的发生率为 45%。胰腺癌患者的人数在不断增加,而在这一群体中,患者的日常生活能力(ADLs)往往受到损害。本研究旨在探讨胰腺癌胰腺切除术后围手术期巴特尔指数(Barthel Index,BI)评分(ADLs的有效测量指标)与生存结果之间的关系:我们分析了2010年至2020年间接受胰腺癌胰腺切除术的201名患者的数据。使用BI(范围:0-100;分数越高表示独立性越强)对术前和术后ADL进行评估。术前或术后 BI 得分≤85 分定义为围术期 ADL 能力受损。在对潜在的混杂因素进行调整后,采用考克斯比例危险回归法计算危险比(HRs):201名患者中,14人(7.0%)术前BI评分≤85分,50人(25%)术后BI评分≤85分。围手术期日常活动能力受损与总生存期缩短密切相关(多变量 HR:2.66,95% 置信区间 [95%CI]:1.75-4.03,P<0.05):1.75-4.03, P 结论:胰腺癌胰腺切除术后,围手术期ADL受损与预后不良有关。维持和改善围手术期 ADLs 可在为胰腺癌患者提供良好的长期预后方面发挥重要作用。
{"title":"Impairment of perioperative activities of daily living is associated with poor prognosis following pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer.","authors":"Takashi Ofuchi, Kosuke Mima, Hiromitsu Hayashi, Yuki Adachi, Kosuke Kanemitsu, Takuya Tajiri, Rumi Itoyama, Shigeki Nakagawa, Hirohisa Okabe, Hideo Baba","doi":"10.1007/s00423-024-03478-7","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00423-024-03478-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>It has reported that the prevalence of frailty in patients with pancreatic cancer is 45%. The number of patients with pancreatic cancer is increasing, and within this cohort, patients often suffer from impaired activities of daily living (ADLs). This study aimed to examine the association between perioperative Barthel Index (BI) scores, a validated measure of ADLs, and survival outcomes after pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed the data of 201 patients who underwent pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer between 2010 and 2020. Preoperative and postoperative ADLs were assessed using the BI (range: 0-100; higher scores indicated greater independence). A preoperative or postoperative BI score ≤ 85 was defined as an impairment of perioperative ADLs. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to calculate the hazard ratios (HRs) after adjusting for potential confounders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 201 patients, 14 (7.0%) had a preoperative BI score ≤ 85 and 50 (25%) had a postoperative BI score ≤ 85. Impairment of perioperative ADLs was independently associated with shorter overall survival (multivariable HR: 2.66, 95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 1.75-4.03, P < 0.001), cancer-specific survival (multivariable HR: 2.64, 95%CI: 1.15-4.25, P < 0.001), and recurrence-free survival (multivariable HR: 1.94, 95%CI: 1.08-3.50, P = 0.021).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Impairment of perioperative ADLs is associated with poor prognosis following pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer. The maintenance and improvement of perioperative ADLs could play an important role in providing favorable long-term outcomes in patients with pancreatic cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":17983,"journal":{"name":"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery","volume":"409 1","pages":"289"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142308034","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-23DOI: 10.1007/s00423-024-03476-9
Chinock Cheong, Na Won Kim, Hye Sun Lee, Jeonghyun Kang
Background: We review and analyze research on the application of machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) models to lymph node metastasis (LNM) prediction in patients with T1 colorectal cancer (CRC). Predicting LNM before radical surgery is important in patients with T1 CRC. However, current surgical treatment guidelines are limited. LNM prediction using ML or DL may improve predictive accuracy. The diagnostic accuracy of LNM prediction using ML- and DL-based models for patients with CRC was assessed.
Methods: We performed a comprehensive search of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases (inception to April 30th of 2022) for studies that applied ML or DL to LNM prediction in T1 CRC patients specifically to compare with histopathological findings and not related to radiological aspects.
Results: 33,199 T1 CRC patients enrolled across seven studies with a retrospective design were included. LNM was observed in 3,173 (9.6%) patients. Overall, the ML- and DL-based model exhibited a sensitivity of 0.944 and specificity of 0.877 for the prediction of LNM in patients with T1 CRC. Six different types of ML and DL models were used across the studies included in this meta-analysis. Therefore, a high degree of heterogeneity was observed.
Conclusions: The ML and DL models provided high sensitivity and specificity for predicting LNM in patients with T1 CRC, and the heterogeneity between studies was significant. These results suggest the potential of ML or DL as diagnostic tools. However, more reliable algorithms should be developed for predicting LNM before surgery in patients with T1 CRC.
{"title":"Application of machine learning for predicting lymph node metastasis in T1 colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Chinock Cheong, Na Won Kim, Hye Sun Lee, Jeonghyun Kang","doi":"10.1007/s00423-024-03476-9","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00423-024-03476-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We review and analyze research on the application of machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) models to lymph node metastasis (LNM) prediction in patients with T1 colorectal cancer (CRC). Predicting LNM before radical surgery is important in patients with T1 CRC. However, current surgical treatment guidelines are limited. LNM prediction using ML or DL may improve predictive accuracy. The diagnostic accuracy of LNM prediction using ML- and DL-based models for patients with CRC was assessed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a comprehensive search of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases (inception to April 30th of 2022) for studies that applied ML or DL to LNM prediction in T1 CRC patients specifically to compare with histopathological findings and not related to radiological aspects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>33,199 T1 CRC patients enrolled across seven studies with a retrospective design were included. LNM was observed in 3,173 (9.6%) patients. Overall, the ML- and DL-based model exhibited a sensitivity of 0.944 and specificity of 0.877 for the prediction of LNM in patients with T1 CRC. Six different types of ML and DL models were used across the studies included in this meta-analysis. Therefore, a high degree of heterogeneity was observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The ML and DL models provided high sensitivity and specificity for predicting LNM in patients with T1 CRC, and the heterogeneity between studies was significant. These results suggest the potential of ML or DL as diagnostic tools. However, more reliable algorithms should be developed for predicting LNM before surgery in patients with T1 CRC.</p>","PeriodicalId":17983,"journal":{"name":"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery","volume":"409 1","pages":"287"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142290331","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-21DOI: 10.1007/s00423-024-03483-w
Abdullah Khalid, Shamsher A Pasha, Lyudmyla Demyan, Oliver Standring, Elliot Newman, Daniel A King, Danielle DePeralta, Sepideh Gholami, Matthew J Weiss, Marcovalerio Melis
Background: Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC) primarily affects older individuals with diminished physiological reserves. The Modified 5-Item Frailty Index (mFI-5) is a novel risk stratification tool proposed to predict postoperative morbidity and mortality. This study aimed to validate the mFI-5 for predicting surgical outcomes in patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) for PDAC.
Methods: Our retrospective PDAC database included patients who underwent PD between 2014 and 2023. Patients were stratified by mFI-5 scores (0 best - 5 worst), which assess preoperative CHF, diabetes mellitus, history of COPD or pneumonia, functional health status, and hypertension requiring medication. Associations between mFI-5 scores and outcomes, including postoperative complications and mortality, were analyzed using logistic regression, Cox proportional hazards models, and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis.
Results: Among 250 PDAC patients undergoing PD, 142 (56.8%) had mFI-5 scores ≤ 1, and 25 (10%) had scores ≥ 3. No patients had scores > 4. Higher mFI-5 scores correlated with older age (p < 0.001) and tobacco use (p = 0.036). Multivariate analysis identified age (RR 1.02, p = 0.038), ASA class (ASA III; RR 2.61, p < 0.001; ASA IV; RR 2.63, p = 0.026), and moderate alcohol consumption (RR 0.56, p = 0.038) as frailty predictors. An mFI-5 score > 2 independently associated with higher mortality (HR 2.08, p = 0.026). Median overall survival was significantly lower for patients with mFI-5 scores > 2 than for those with scores ≤ 2 (21.3 vs. 42.1 months, p = 0.022).
Conclusions: The mFI-5 is a valuable tool for predicting postoperative morbidity and mortality in PDAC patients undergoing PD. Integrating frailty assessment into preoperative evaluations can enhance patient selection and surgical outcomes. Future research should focus on incorporating frailty assessments into surgical planning and patient management to improve outcomes in this vulnerable population.
{"title":"Modified 5-Item Frailty Index (mFI-5) may predict postoperative outcomes after pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic Cancer.","authors":"Abdullah Khalid, Shamsher A Pasha, Lyudmyla Demyan, Oliver Standring, Elliot Newman, Daniel A King, Danielle DePeralta, Sepideh Gholami, Matthew J Weiss, Marcovalerio Melis","doi":"10.1007/s00423-024-03483-w","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00423-024-03483-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC) primarily affects older individuals with diminished physiological reserves. The Modified 5-Item Frailty Index (mFI-5) is a novel risk stratification tool proposed to predict postoperative morbidity and mortality. This study aimed to validate the mFI-5 for predicting surgical outcomes in patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) for PDAC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our retrospective PDAC database included patients who underwent PD between 2014 and 2023. Patients were stratified by mFI-5 scores (0 best - 5 worst), which assess preoperative CHF, diabetes mellitus, history of COPD or pneumonia, functional health status, and hypertension requiring medication. Associations between mFI-5 scores and outcomes, including postoperative complications and mortality, were analyzed using logistic regression, Cox proportional hazards models, and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 250 PDAC patients undergoing PD, 142 (56.8%) had mFI-5 scores ≤ 1, and 25 (10%) had scores ≥ 3. No patients had scores > 4. Higher mFI-5 scores correlated with older age (p < 0.001) and tobacco use (p = 0.036). Multivariate analysis identified age (RR 1.02, p = 0.038), ASA class (ASA III; RR 2.61, p < 0.001; ASA IV; RR 2.63, p = 0.026), and moderate alcohol consumption (RR 0.56, p = 0.038) as frailty predictors. An mFI-5 score > 2 independently associated with higher mortality (HR 2.08, p = 0.026). Median overall survival was significantly lower for patients with mFI-5 scores > 2 than for those with scores ≤ 2 (21.3 vs. 42.1 months, p = 0.022).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The mFI-5 is a valuable tool for predicting postoperative morbidity and mortality in PDAC patients undergoing PD. Integrating frailty assessment into preoperative evaluations can enhance patient selection and surgical outcomes. Future research should focus on incorporating frailty assessments into surgical planning and patient management to improve outcomes in this vulnerable population.</p>","PeriodicalId":17983,"journal":{"name":"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery","volume":"409 1","pages":"286"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142290332","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}