首页 > 最新文献

Medical Education最新文献

英文 中文
When medical education and health policy meet: Will we find our leaders there? 当医学教育和卫生政策相遇时:我们会在那里找到我们的领导者吗?
IF 6 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Pub Date : 2023-10-17 DOI: 10.1111/medu.15250
Henry G. Annan, Victor Do
<p>Health systems globally are finding themselves in a once-in-a-generation state of crisis. Health human resource challenges, including both workforce shortage and suboptimal distribution, have contributed to ever increasing wait times and poor access to primary, specialty and surgical care.<span><sup>1</sup></span> The ongoing health system challenges are also contributing to high rates of health care workforce burnout and subsequent attrition.<span><sup>2, 3</sup></span> Globally, there is contentious debate on the best steps forward. While it is critical that the discourse centres around promoting health equity and increasing patient access, the implications of the current health crises on physician training deserve further attention. As such, medical education senior leaders must recognise and articulate the impact that health policy decisions have on the formation of tomorrow's physicians.</p><p>McOwen et al. recently published a laudable effort trying to delineate the boundaries of medical education through the lens of its leaders.<span><sup>4</sup></span> The authors find that medical education sits at the intersection of three domains: clinical medicine, university administration and hospital administration. Navigating through these worlds is an exercise in harnessing positionality and agency in order to realise their self-described fiduciary responsibility to the public—‘to produce doctors’. Indeed, it is telling that the figured world of health policy did not feature in the participants' reflections. Do medical education senior leaders see themselves as having agency, improvisation, discourse, positionality and power in this world? And if so, are they willing and able to use the affordances it provides them in their quest to train high quality physicians of the future?</p><p>One interviewed leader discussed how they collaborated with the local health system during the COVID-19 pandemic to integrate learners into virtual care settings given that public health restrictions did not allow for traditional face to face clinical encounters. In doing so, the participant reconsidered ‘their own positionality and power at the local level’ to mitigate the potential negative impacts the newly implemented policy measures had on clinical learning. Although not underscored in the article, their advocacy was a demonstration of how a public health policy shaped the learning environment. Furthermore, as another participant noted, teaching medical students how to use telehealth helps make the case for more widespread use of virtual care as a sustainable health care delivery modality as the future health care workforce would have been trained in its use—an example of how medical education can influence future health policy. These two anecdotes illustrate how health system and medical education transformation go hand in hand. As McOwen et al. state, ‘medical education is shaped by and shapes the clinical learning environment’. However, health policy too sh
全球卫生系统正处于一代人中仅有一次的危机状态。卫生人力资源方面的挑战,包括劳动力短缺和分配不均,导致等待时间不断延长,初级、专科和外科医疗服务的可及性越来越差。虽然围绕促进医疗公平和增加患者就医机会的讨论至关重要,但当前的医疗危机对医生培训的影响值得进一步关注。McOwen 等人最近发表了一篇值得称赞的文章,试图通过医学教育领导者的视角来划分医学教育的界限。4 作者发现,医学教育处于三个领域的交叉点:临床医学、大学管理和医院管理。4 作者发现,医学教育处于三个领域的交叉点:临床医学、大学行政管理和医院行政管理。在这些领域中穿行,是一种利用地位和能动性的练习,以实现他们自诩的对公众的信托责任--"培养医生"。事实上,在与会者的反思中,卫生政策领域并没有出现,这一点很能说明问题。医学教育的高层领导是否认为自己在这个世界上具有能动性、即兴性、话语权、地位和权力?一位受访的领导者讨论了在 COVID-19 大流行期间,鉴于公共卫生限制不允许传统的面对面临床接触,他们如何与当地卫生系统合作,将学习者纳入虚拟医疗环境。在此过程中,该学员重新考虑了 "自己在当地的地位和权力",以减轻新实施的政策措施对临床学习的潜在负面影响。虽然文章中没有强调,但他们的倡导体现了公共卫生政策是如何影响学习环境的。此外,正如另一位与会者所指出的,教授医学生如何使用远程医疗有助于使虚拟医疗作为一种可持续的医疗服务方式得到更广泛的使用,因为未来的医护人员将接受过使用虚拟医疗的培训--这就是医学教育如何影响未来卫生政策的一个例子。这两则轶事说明了医疗系统和医学教育的转型是如何齐头并进的。正如 McOwen 等人所说,"医学教育受临床学习环境的影响,也塑造了临床学习环境"。然而,卫生政策也塑造了医学教育,同时也被医学教育所塑造,这两个领域之间的舞蹈值得进一步探讨。"文献中描述医学教育与卫生政策之间关系的主要方式之一是在医生队伍规划的背景下。加拿大医学院协会 2018 年的一项研究发现,医科学生岗位数量与政府资助的医学研究生岗位数量不匹配,导致未能进入住院医师培训项目的医学毕业生人数上升。此外,贝茨等人还描述了可以改善医学教育与卫生政策优先事项之间一致性的领域,包括采取措施使全科专业的职业对医学生更具吸引力,以及地区医学院校园在解决农村和偏远社区医生供应挑战方面可以发挥的作用。6 尽管这些文章发表于 2008 年,但十多年后的今天,其中描述的许多问题和经验教训仍然十分突出,这表明医学教育和卫生政策的高度优先领域充其量只是进展缓慢。归根结底,我们必须更清楚地认识到,医学教育是促进公益事业的载体。我们相信,真正了解医学教育与卫生政策之间的交集,有助于医学教育工作者确定如何以最佳方式参与肯定会影响其工作的重要政策讨论。它可以激发他们的研究工作,研究特定的卫生系统政策会如何影响医学学习者。它还可以帮助医学教育领导者更自如地与政策制定者进行更直接、更主动的对话。 最重要的是,这可以增强他们的能力,使他们将自己视为卫生政策领域的重要参与者。无论是大流行病的突发事件引发了我们对医学生教育方式的范式转变,还是医学培训的这种转变如何更好地改变了医疗服务的提供方式,医学教育影响着卫生政策,也被卫生政策所影响。如果医学教育的高层领导不能充分认识到并利用自身在卫生政策领域的力量,这可能意味着医学教育将永远 "追赶 "卫生政策的变化。如果医学教育领导者的受托责任是培养高素质的未来医生,那么他们就有义务向公众阐明卫生系统的变化会如何阻碍或促进这一目标的实现。因此,医学教育的领导者最好能利用这些现实情况,尤其是在当前各国政府都在积极寻找答案,以解决这一代人所面临的一些最紧迫的医疗挑战的时候:构思;调查;撰写-初稿;撰写-审阅和编辑。维克多-杜构思;写作-审阅和编辑。
{"title":"When medical education and health policy meet: Will we find our leaders there?","authors":"Henry G. Annan,&nbsp;Victor Do","doi":"10.1111/medu.15250","DOIUrl":"10.1111/medu.15250","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;Health systems globally are finding themselves in a once-in-a-generation state of crisis. Health human resource challenges, including both workforce shortage and suboptimal distribution, have contributed to ever increasing wait times and poor access to primary, specialty and surgical care.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;1&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; The ongoing health system challenges are also contributing to high rates of health care workforce burnout and subsequent attrition.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;2, 3&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; Globally, there is contentious debate on the best steps forward. While it is critical that the discourse centres around promoting health equity and increasing patient access, the implications of the current health crises on physician training deserve further attention. As such, medical education senior leaders must recognise and articulate the impact that health policy decisions have on the formation of tomorrow's physicians.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;McOwen et al. recently published a laudable effort trying to delineate the boundaries of medical education through the lens of its leaders.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;4&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; The authors find that medical education sits at the intersection of three domains: clinical medicine, university administration and hospital administration. Navigating through these worlds is an exercise in harnessing positionality and agency in order to realise their self-described fiduciary responsibility to the public—‘to produce doctors’. Indeed, it is telling that the figured world of health policy did not feature in the participants' reflections. Do medical education senior leaders see themselves as having agency, improvisation, discourse, positionality and power in this world? And if so, are they willing and able to use the affordances it provides them in their quest to train high quality physicians of the future?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;One interviewed leader discussed how they collaborated with the local health system during the COVID-19 pandemic to integrate learners into virtual care settings given that public health restrictions did not allow for traditional face to face clinical encounters. In doing so, the participant reconsidered ‘their own positionality and power at the local level’ to mitigate the potential negative impacts the newly implemented policy measures had on clinical learning. Although not underscored in the article, their advocacy was a demonstration of how a public health policy shaped the learning environment. Furthermore, as another participant noted, teaching medical students how to use telehealth helps make the case for more widespread use of virtual care as a sustainable health care delivery modality as the future health care workforce would have been trained in its use—an example of how medical education can influence future health policy. These two anecdotes illustrate how health system and medical education transformation go hand in hand. As McOwen et al. state, ‘medical education is shaped by and shapes the clinical learning environment’. However, health policy too sh","PeriodicalId":18370,"journal":{"name":"Medical Education","volume":"58 2","pages":"174-176"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/medu.15250","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41236651","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
November in this issue 本期11月
IF 6 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Pub Date : 2023-10-16 DOI: 10.1111/medu.15240
<p>This study investigates how surgical and intensive care trainees come to understand the quality of their performance and the role of feedback conversations. Trainees reported some commonalities between specialty, but they also indicated highly divergent experiences. They had to ‘patch together’ performance information into an evolving picture of overall progress; this was particularly challenging in intensive care, which was a more ambiguous and emotional clinical context. Attending to how, when and where trainee meaning making takes place may allow for effective conversations within specialty feedback cultures.</p><p>Bearman, M, Ajjawi, R, Castanelli, D, et al Meaning making about performance: A comparison of two specialty feedback cultures. <i>Med Educ</i>. 2023;57(11):1010–1019. doi:10.1111/medu.15118</p><p>The authors confirm that interprofessional identity is a source of intrinsic motivation towards interprofessional collaboration related to wider group membership. Their study provides additional evidence for the extended professional identity theory that combines two psychological identity approaches - identity theory and social identity theory - applied to interprofessional group membership. The findings imply that interprofessional identity can affect interprofessional collaboration apart from an established team or network.</p><p>Reinders, J-J, Krijnen, W. Interprofessional identity and motivation towards interprofessional collaboration. <i>Med Educ</i>. 2023;57(11):1068–1078. doi:10.1111/medu.15096</p><p>This study explores how mentorship relationships in surgery initiate, persist, and evolve. Interviews with mentors and mentees revealed key themes: success begins with a good fit, continues through timely communication, and deepens via mutual investment and learning. Addressing tensions, balancing formality and friendship, recognising transitions, and identifying areas of contribution are essential. The study underscores that successful mentorship is dynamic, demanding active engagement and shared responsibility from both mentors and mentees. Co-regulation and mutual investment play crucial roles in nurturing growth and learning within these relationships.</p><p>Louridas M, Enani GN, Brydges R, MacRae HM. Exploring Mentorship in Surgery: An Interview Study on How People Stick Together. <i>Med Educ</i>. 2023;57(11):1028-1035. doi:10.1111/medu.15157</p><p>This study examines how physicians address social determinants of health that are beyond their control, aiming to improve trainee preparedness. ‘Helplessness’ stories reveal emotional distress when unable to support patients, while ‘Shortcoming’ and ‘Transformation’ narratives show how realisations about shortcomings lead to personal transformation. ‘Doctor-patient relationship’ stories emphasise its importance, and ‘System advocacy’ stories stress the need for advocacy to change broken systems. The study suggests that current approaches focusing solely on altering social circumstance
本研究调查了外科和重症监护培训生如何理解他们的表现质量和反馈对话的作用。学员们报告了不同专业之间的一些共性,但他们也表示了高度不同的经历。他们必须将业绩信息“拼凑”成整体进展的不断变化的图景;这在重症监护中尤其具有挑战性,因为重症监护是一个更加模糊和情绪化的临床环境。关注培训生如何、何时、何地进行意义生成,可以在专业反馈文化中进行有效的对话。Bearman, M, Ajjawi, R, Castanelli, D,等。绩效意义建构:两种专业反馈文化的比较。中华医学杂志,2009;37(11):1010-1019。doi: 10.1111 / medu。15118 .作者证实,跨专业认同是与更广泛的群体成员关系相关的跨专业合作的内在动机来源。他们的研究为扩展职业认同理论提供了额外的证据,该理论结合了两种心理认同理论-认同理论和社会认同理论-适用于跨专业群体成员。研究结果表明,跨专业认同可以影响跨专业合作,而不是建立团队或网络。李建军,李建军。跨专业认同与跨专业合作动机。中华医学杂志,2009;37(11):1068-1078。doi: 10.1111 / medu。[15096]本研究探讨外科中师徒关系如何开始、持续和发展。对导师和学员的采访揭示了关键主题:成功始于良好的契合,持续于及时的沟通,并通过相互投资和学习而加深。处理紧张关系,平衡形式和友谊,认识到过渡,并确定贡献领域是必不可少的。该研究强调,成功的师徒关系是动态的,需要导师和学员双方的积极参与和共同承担责任。共同监管和相互投资在促进这些关系中的成长和学习方面发挥着至关重要的作用。Louridas M, Enani GN, bridges R, MacRae HM。探索外科指导:一项关于人们如何团结在一起的访谈研究。中华医学杂志,2009;37(11):1028-1035。doi: 10.1111 / medu。15157 .本研究探讨了医生如何处理他们无法控制的健康社会决定因素,旨在提高见习生的准备程度。“无助”的故事揭示了当无法支持病人时的情绪困扰,而“缺点”和“转变”的故事展示了对缺点的认识如何导致个人转变。“医患关系”的故事强调它的重要性,而“系统倡导”的故事强调需要倡导改变破碎的系统。该研究表明,目前的方法只关注改变社会环境可能会导致痛苦和倦怠,提倡其他应对策略,如自我完善、与患者联系和倡导努力。Peebles ER, Pack R, Goldszmidt M.从无助到转变:临床医生关于健康的社会决定因素及其对培训和实践的影响的分析。中华医学杂志,2009;37(11):1054-1067。doi: 10.1111 / medu.15184
{"title":"November in this issue","authors":"","doi":"10.1111/medu.15240","DOIUrl":"10.1111/medu.15240","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;This study investigates how surgical and intensive care trainees come to understand the quality of their performance and the role of feedback conversations. Trainees reported some commonalities between specialty, but they also indicated highly divergent experiences. They had to ‘patch together’ performance information into an evolving picture of overall progress; this was particularly challenging in intensive care, which was a more ambiguous and emotional clinical context. Attending to how, when and where trainee meaning making takes place may allow for effective conversations within specialty feedback cultures.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Bearman, M, Ajjawi, R, Castanelli, D, et al Meaning making about performance: A comparison of two specialty feedback cultures. &lt;i&gt;Med Educ&lt;/i&gt;. 2023;57(11):1010–1019. doi:10.1111/medu.15118&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The authors confirm that interprofessional identity is a source of intrinsic motivation towards interprofessional collaboration related to wider group membership. Their study provides additional evidence for the extended professional identity theory that combines two psychological identity approaches - identity theory and social identity theory - applied to interprofessional group membership. The findings imply that interprofessional identity can affect interprofessional collaboration apart from an established team or network.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Reinders, J-J, Krijnen, W. Interprofessional identity and motivation towards interprofessional collaboration. &lt;i&gt;Med Educ&lt;/i&gt;. 2023;57(11):1068–1078. doi:10.1111/medu.15096&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This study explores how mentorship relationships in surgery initiate, persist, and evolve. Interviews with mentors and mentees revealed key themes: success begins with a good fit, continues through timely communication, and deepens via mutual investment and learning. Addressing tensions, balancing formality and friendship, recognising transitions, and identifying areas of contribution are essential. The study underscores that successful mentorship is dynamic, demanding active engagement and shared responsibility from both mentors and mentees. Co-regulation and mutual investment play crucial roles in nurturing growth and learning within these relationships.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Louridas M, Enani GN, Brydges R, MacRae HM. Exploring Mentorship in Surgery: An Interview Study on How People Stick Together. &lt;i&gt;Med Educ&lt;/i&gt;. 2023;57(11):1028-1035. doi:10.1111/medu.15157&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This study examines how physicians address social determinants of health that are beyond their control, aiming to improve trainee preparedness. ‘Helplessness’ stories reveal emotional distress when unable to support patients, while ‘Shortcoming’ and ‘Transformation’ narratives show how realisations about shortcomings lead to personal transformation. ‘Doctor-patient relationship’ stories emphasise its importance, and ‘System advocacy’ stories stress the need for advocacy to change broken systems. The study suggests that current approaches focusing solely on altering social circumstance","PeriodicalId":18370,"journal":{"name":"Medical Education","volume":"57 11","pages":"993"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/medu.15240","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41236653","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
November 2023 RGS Table of Contents 2023年11月RGS目录
IF 6 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Pub Date : 2023-10-16 DOI: 10.1111/medu.15241
{"title":"November 2023 RGS Table of Contents","authors":"","doi":"10.1111/medu.15241","DOIUrl":"10.1111/medu.15241","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":18370,"journal":{"name":"Medical Education","volume":"57 11","pages":"1117"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41236652","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A view from the top: A qualitative exploration of top-level health care leaders’ perceptions on the implementation of simulation-based education in postgraduate medical education 自上而下的观点:对顶级医疗保健领导者对在研究生医学教育中实施模拟教育的看法进行定性探索。
IF 6 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Pub Date : 2023-10-13 DOI: 10.1111/medu.15248
Leizl Joy Nayahangan, Ebbe Thinggaard, Farsana Khan, Amandus Gustafsson, Anne Mette Mørcke, Adam Dubrowski, Laura E. Hirshfield, Lars Konge

Introduction

Although there is substantial evidence supporting the benefits of simulation-based education (SBE), its widespread and effective implementation remains challenging. The aim of this study was to explore the perceptions of top-level health care leaders regarding SBE and the barriers and facilitators that influence its wide implementation as part of the postgraduate surgical curricula in Denmark.

Methods

We conducted semi-structured interviews with top-level health care leaders who were chosen based on their roles in ensuring high-quality patient care delivery and developing strategies to achieve the goals of the entire health care system. The interview transcripts were translated into English, and a thematic approach was used to code and inductively analyse the data. We used the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to identify and understand the determinants to a successful implementation of SBE.

Results

We interviewed 13 participants from different political and administrative levels. We found that the participants had limited knowledge about SBE, which highlighted a disconnection between these leaders and the educational environment. This was further compounded by a lack of effective communication and inadequate information dissemination between simulation centres and higher-level organisations. While participants recognised the benefits of SBE for doctors in training, they expressed concerns about the implementation given the already strained health care system and limited resources. The need for evidence, particularly in the context of patient safety, was emphasised to facilitate SBE implementation. Although participants supported the implementation of SBE, it was unclear who should initiate action.

Discussion

This study highlighted the perspectives of top-level health care leaders regarding SBE and identified the determinant factors for a successful implementation. Effective communication channels are crucial to enhance collaborations and reduce the disconnection between the different health care organisational levels. Strategic implementation processes, including the roles and responsibilities, should be defined and established. These will inform decisions regarding the implementation strategies to effectively integrate SBE into the residency training curricula.

引言:尽管有大量证据支持基于模拟的教育(SBE)的好处,但其广泛有效的实施仍然具有挑战性。本研究的目的是探讨顶级医疗保健领导者对SBE的看法,以及影响SBE作为丹麦外科研究生课程一部分广泛实施的障碍和促进者以及制定战略以实现整个医疗保健系统的目标。访谈记录被翻译成英文,并采用专题方法对数据进行编码和归纳分析。我们使用实施研究综合框架来确定和理解SBE成功实施的决定因素。结果:我们采访了来自不同政治和行政级别的13名参与者。我们发现,参与者对SBE的了解有限,这突出了这些领导者与教育环境之间的脱节。模拟中心和上级组织之间缺乏有效沟通和信息传播不足,进一步加剧了这种情况。虽然参与者认识到SBE对医生培训的好处,但考虑到已经紧张的医疗保健系统和有限的资源,他们对实施SBE表示担忧。强调了证据的必要性,特别是在患者安全的背景下,以促进SBE的实施。尽管与会者支持实施SBE,但尚不清楚谁应该采取行动。讨论:本研究强调了顶级医疗保健领导者对SBE的看法,并确定了成功实施的决定因素。有效的沟通渠道对于加强合作和减少不同医疗保健组织层面之间的脱节至关重要。应界定和确立战略执行进程,包括作用和责任。这些将为有关实施战略的决策提供信息,以有效地将SBE纳入住院培训课程。
{"title":"A view from the top: A qualitative exploration of top-level health care leaders’ perceptions on the implementation of simulation-based education in postgraduate medical education","authors":"Leizl Joy Nayahangan,&nbsp;Ebbe Thinggaard,&nbsp;Farsana Khan,&nbsp;Amandus Gustafsson,&nbsp;Anne Mette Mørcke,&nbsp;Adam Dubrowski,&nbsp;Laura E. Hirshfield,&nbsp;Lars Konge","doi":"10.1111/medu.15248","DOIUrl":"10.1111/medu.15248","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Introduction</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Although there is substantial evidence supporting the benefits of simulation-based education (SBE), its widespread and effective implementation remains challenging. The aim of this study was to explore the perceptions of top-level health care leaders regarding SBE and the barriers and facilitators that influence its wide implementation as part of the postgraduate surgical curricula in Denmark.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We conducted semi-structured interviews with top-level health care leaders who were chosen based on their roles in ensuring high-quality patient care delivery and developing strategies to achieve the goals of the entire health care system. The interview transcripts were translated into English, and a thematic approach was used to code and inductively analyse the data. We used the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to identify and understand the determinants to a successful implementation of SBE.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We interviewed 13 participants from different political and administrative levels. We found that the participants had limited knowledge about SBE, which highlighted a disconnection between these leaders and the educational environment. This was further compounded by a lack of effective communication and inadequate information dissemination between simulation centres and higher-level organisations. While participants recognised the benefits of SBE for doctors in training, they expressed concerns about the implementation given the already strained health care system and limited resources. The need for evidence, particularly in the context of patient safety, was emphasised to facilitate SBE implementation. Although participants supported the implementation of SBE, it was unclear who should initiate action.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Discussion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This study highlighted the perspectives of top-level health care leaders regarding SBE and identified the determinant factors for a successful implementation. Effective communication channels are crucial to enhance collaborations and reduce the disconnection between the different health care organisational levels. Strategic implementation processes, including the roles and responsibilities, should be defined and established. These will inform decisions regarding the implementation strategies to effectively integrate SBE into the residency training curricula.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":18370,"journal":{"name":"Medical Education","volume":"58 4","pages":"415-429"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41204637","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Guide on the side: Planting the seed of interprofessional collaboration among medical education students 一旁的指导:在医学教育学生中播下跨专业合作的种子。
IF 6 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Pub Date : 2023-10-12 DOI: 10.1111/medu.15251
Fraide A. Ganotice Jr.
{"title":"Guide on the side: Planting the seed of interprofessional collaboration among medical education students","authors":"Fraide A. Ganotice Jr.","doi":"10.1111/medu.15251","DOIUrl":"10.1111/medu.15251","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":18370,"journal":{"name":"Medical Education","volume":"58 4","pages":"465"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41204639","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A response to Rees and Monrouxe's “moving beyond narrative content to analyse educator data as discourse” 对Rees和Monrouxe“超越叙事内容,将教育数据作为话语进行分析”的回应。
IF 6 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Pub Date : 2023-10-12 DOI: 10.1111/medu.15252
Marwa Schumann
{"title":"A response to Rees and Monrouxe's “moving beyond narrative content to analyse educator data as discourse”","authors":"Marwa Schumann","doi":"10.1111/medu.15252","DOIUrl":"10.1111/medu.15252","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":18370,"journal":{"name":"Medical Education","volume":"58 5","pages":"653-654"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41204636","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Constructing conclusions on solid foundations: A response to Chytas et al 在坚实的基础上构建结论:对Chytas等人的回应。
IF 6 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Pub Date : 2023-10-11 DOI: 10.1111/medu.15249
Vicky Vandenbossche, Martin Valcke, Wouter Willaert, Emmanuel Audenaert
{"title":"Constructing conclusions on solid foundations: A response to Chytas et al","authors":"Vicky Vandenbossche,&nbsp;Martin Valcke,&nbsp;Wouter Willaert,&nbsp;Emmanuel Audenaert","doi":"10.1111/medu.15249","DOIUrl":"10.1111/medu.15249","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":18370,"journal":{"name":"Medical Education","volume":"58 5","pages":"652"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41204638","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Bridging the gap: Understanding the barriers and facilitators to performance for Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic medical students in the United Kingdom 弥合差距:了解英国黑人、亚裔和少数民族医学生表现的障碍和促进因素。
IF 6 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Pub Date : 2023-10-08 DOI: 10.1111/medu.15246
Nariell Morrison, Michelle Machado, Clare Blackburn

Introduction

Differential attainment is a well-known phenomenon in medical education. Despite a strong impetus for institutions and researchers to move away from a ‘student deficit model’ when exploring the attainment gap, little attention has been given to understanding the experiences of Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic (BAME) medical students. Informed by the social construction of learning theory, this is the first national study to explore how multiple dimensions of the medical school environment impact academic performance of BAME undergraduate medical students across the UK.

Methods

Using a sequential explanatory mixed-methods approach, the authors conducted a survey and facilitated three focus groups across medical schools in the UK between 2020–2021. Participants self-identified as being from BAME backgrounds. Quantitative analyses included descriptive statistics and bivariate analyses. Qualitative data were analysed using thematic analysis, subsequently identifying inductive themes.

Results

Three hundred sixty-two respondents completed the Phase 1 survey, and 17 participants participated in the Phase 2 focus groups. Although both survey and focus group participants identified facilitators to learning such as supportive relationships, students reported facing numerous barriers that they felt impeded their learning and performance. These barriers included limited access to educational resources, and undiversified curricula and medical school populations. Students also described both experiencing and witnessing various forms of racism throughout their educational journeys.

Discussion

Students encountered various difficulties throughout their medical training that they felt impacted their learning and performance. This study offers novel insights into the experiences of BAME students and builds upon previous research. It also reveals the pervasive nature of racism within medical schools, highlighting the urgent need for institutional changes. Educators and institutions must go beyond merely recognising these barriers and facilitators; they must proactively innovate and adapt. In doing so, they pave the way for inclusive learning environments that truly foster a sense of belonging for BAME students.

引言:成就差异是医学教育中一个众所周知的现象。尽管各机构和研究人员在探索成绩差距时大力推动他们摆脱“学生赤字模式”,但很少关注了解黑人、亚裔和少数民族(BAME)医学生的经历。根据学习理论的社会建构,这是第一项探索医学院环境的多个维度如何影响英国BAME医学本科生学习成绩的全国性研究,作者在2020-2021年间进行了一项调查,并为英国医学院的三个焦点小组提供了便利。参与者自称来自BAME背景。定量分析包括描述性统计和双变量分析。使用主题分析对定性数据进行分析,随后确定归纳主题。结果:362名受访者完成了第一阶段的调查,17名参与者参加了第二阶段的重点小组。尽管调查和焦点小组参与者都确定了学习的促进者,如支持性关系,但学生们报告说,他们面临着许多障碍,他们觉得这些障碍阻碍了他们的学习和表现。这些障碍包括获得教育资源的机会有限,以及课程和医学院人口的多样化。学生们还描述了他们在整个教育过程中经历和目睹的各种形式的种族主义。讨论:学生们在医学训练中遇到了各种困难,他们觉得这些困难影响了他们的学习和表现。这项研究在先前研究的基础上,对BAME学生的经历提供了新颖的见解。它还揭示了医学院中种族主义的普遍性,突出了制度变革的迫切需要。教育工作者和机构必须超越仅仅认识到这些障碍和促进者;他们必须主动创新和适应。通过这样做,他们为真正培养BAME学生归属感的包容性学习环境铺平了道路。
{"title":"Bridging the gap: Understanding the barriers and facilitators to performance for Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic medical students in the United Kingdom","authors":"Nariell Morrison,&nbsp;Michelle Machado,&nbsp;Clare Blackburn","doi":"10.1111/medu.15246","DOIUrl":"10.1111/medu.15246","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Introduction</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Differential attainment is a well-known phenomenon in medical education. Despite a strong impetus for institutions and researchers to move away from a ‘student deficit model’ when exploring the attainment gap, little attention has been given to understanding the experiences of Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic (BAME) medical students. Informed by the social construction of learning theory, this is the first national study to explore how multiple dimensions of the medical school environment impact academic performance of BAME undergraduate medical students across the UK.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Using a sequential explanatory mixed-methods approach, the authors conducted a survey and facilitated three focus groups across medical schools in the UK between 2020–2021. Participants self-identified as being from BAME backgrounds. Quantitative analyses included descriptive statistics and bivariate analyses. Qualitative data were analysed using thematic analysis, subsequently identifying inductive themes.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Three hundred sixty-two respondents completed the Phase 1 survey, and 17 participants participated in the Phase 2 focus groups. Although both survey and focus group participants identified facilitators to learning such as supportive relationships, students reported facing numerous barriers that they felt impeded their learning and performance. These barriers included limited access to educational resources, and undiversified curricula and medical school populations. Students also described both experiencing and witnessing various forms of racism throughout their educational journeys.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Discussion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Students encountered various difficulties throughout their medical training that they felt impacted their learning and performance. This study offers novel insights into the experiences of BAME students and builds upon previous research. It also reveals the pervasive nature of racism within medical schools, highlighting the urgent need for institutional changes. Educators and institutions must go beyond merely recognising these barriers and facilitators; they must proactively innovate and adapt. In doing so, they pave the way for inclusive learning environments that truly foster a sense of belonging for BAME students.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":18370,"journal":{"name":"Medical Education","volume":"58 4","pages":"443-456"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/medu.15246","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41176650","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The cross-cutting edge: Medical selection and education viewed through the lens of emotional intelligence 交叉前沿:从情商的角度看医学选择和教育。
IF 6 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Pub Date : 2023-10-06 DOI: 10.1111/medu.15244
Paul A. Tiffin, Richard D. Roberts

Context

Evidence suggesting the benefits of compassionate, person-centred care, for both patients and physicians is accruing. Medical selection, for example, aims to choose future health professionals that possess the correct attitudes, beliefs and personal attributes to deliver such care. Moreover, once in training, these desirable personal qualities should be developed and maintained, sometimes in the face of adverse health care service conditions. However, advances in selecting for, and developing, these abilities and attributes in health care have been hindered by a lack of clarity regarding how the relevant skills and traits should be defined, measured, developed and maintained in clinicians.

Methods

In this article, we demonstrate how developments in the emotional intelligence (EI) field can be applied to the challenge of selecting for, and developing, relevant interpersonal care skills in medical students and physicians. The concept of EI itself has been somewhat controversial. However, a more nuanced understanding of EI has evolved in the light of research findings that can be applied to medical selection and education. Specifically, we propose modifications to the existing ‘cascading’ model of EI. This model identifies, and relates, several key socioemotional skills and traits that could be considered as ‘the elementary particles’ of EI required to deliver compassionate, person-centred care.

Conclusions

Our model of EI, which is relevant to care delivery, identifies putative targets for both medical selection and training. Selection for medical school and subsequent clinical education should focus on screening out those with low levels of the traits and abilities less amenable to training. Conversely, medical education should be concerned with developing and maintaining the socioemotional skills, attitudes and behaviours critical to the delivery of compassionate, person-centred care. This is especially important for specialties characterised by high levels of emotional labour and possible resultant compassion fatigue.

背景:有证据表明,富有同情心、以人为本的护理对患者和医生都有好处。例如,医疗选择旨在选择未来具有正确态度、信念和个人特质的卫生专业人员来提供此类护理。此外,一旦接受培训,这些理想的个人素质就应该得到培养和保持,有时还要面对不利的医疗服务条件。然而,由于临床医生不清楚如何定义、衡量、发展和保持相关技能和特征,在医疗保健中选择和发展这些能力和属性的进展受到了阻碍。方法:在这篇文章中,我们展示了情商(EI)领域的发展如何应用于医学生和医生选择和发展相关人际护理技能的挑战。EI的概念本身就有些争议。然而,根据可应用于医学选择和教育的研究结果,对EI有了更细致的理解。具体而言,我们建议对现有的EI“级联”模型进行修改。该模型确定并关联了几个关键的社会情感技能和特征,这些技能和特征可以被视为提供富有同情心、以人为本的护理所需的EI的“基本粒子”。结论:我们的EI模型与护理提供相关,确定了医疗选择和培训的假定目标。医学院的选择和随后的临床教育应该侧重于筛选出那个些不太适合训练的特质和能力水平较低的人。相反,医学教育应关注培养和保持对提供富有同情心、以人为本的护理至关重要的社会情感技能、态度和行为。这对于以高水平的情感劳动和可能导致的同情疲劳为特征的专业来说尤其重要。
{"title":"The cross-cutting edge: Medical selection and education viewed through the lens of emotional intelligence","authors":"Paul A. Tiffin,&nbsp;Richard D. Roberts","doi":"10.1111/medu.15244","DOIUrl":"10.1111/medu.15244","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Context</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Evidence suggesting the benefits of compassionate, person-centred care, for both patients and physicians is accruing. Medical selection, for example, aims to choose future health professionals that possess the correct attitudes, beliefs and personal attributes to deliver such care. Moreover, once in training, these desirable personal qualities should be developed and maintained, sometimes in the face of adverse health care service conditions. However, advances in selecting for, and developing, these abilities and attributes in health care have been hindered by a lack of clarity regarding how the relevant skills and traits should be defined, measured, developed and maintained in clinicians.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>In this article, we demonstrate how developments in the emotional intelligence (EI) field can be applied to the challenge of selecting for, and developing, relevant interpersonal care skills in medical students and physicians. The concept of EI itself has been somewhat controversial. However, a more nuanced understanding of EI has evolved in the light of research findings that can be applied to medical selection and education. Specifically, we propose modifications to the existing ‘cascading’ model of EI. This model identifies, and relates, several key socioemotional skills and traits that could be considered as ‘the elementary particles’ of EI required to deliver compassionate, person-centred care.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Our model of EI, which is relevant to care delivery, identifies putative targets for both medical selection and training. Selection for medical school and subsequent clinical education should focus on screening out those with low levels of the traits and abilities less amenable to training. Conversely, medical education should be concerned with developing and maintaining the socioemotional skills, attitudes and behaviours critical to the delivery of compassionate, person-centred care. This is especially important for specialties characterised by high levels of emotional labour and possible resultant compassion fatigue.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":18370,"journal":{"name":"Medical Education","volume":"58 4","pages":"382-391"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/medu.15244","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41142578","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
What the hell is water? Changing medical education's ideology through validity 水到底是什么?通过有效性改变医学教育的意识形态。
IF 6 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Pub Date : 2023-10-04 DOI: 10.1111/medu.15243
Benjamin Kinnear, Daniel J. Schumacher
<p>In 2005, American novelist David Foster Wallace gave a commencement speech to the graduating class at Kenyon College in the United States. He opened the speech with a parable about two fish:</p><p>Of course, the wisdom in this story is that the ideologies that constitute our realities are often transparent to us, but may not be to others. Assumptions that are baked into our worldviews can keep us from questioning what may be noticeable or unusual to outsiders or novices.</p><p>In this issue of <i>Medical Education</i>, Coyle et al challenge us to examine the waters in which we swim.<span><sup>2</sup></span> They note that efforts to improve widening participation and access to medicine for people from under-privileged or minoritised backgrounds are at tension with medical education's preoccupation with academic excellence as a key metric for applicant selection. The authors poignantly write, ‘We suggest that it is time for medical schools to acknowledge that some of the drivers for ever higher academic thresholds for entry to medicine are artifacts of managing the number of applicants rather than anything more noble’. Such a bold call should rouse medical education to scrutinise the entrenched use of academic excellence as a selection standard by re-examining the rationale for doing so.</p><p>Academic performance has ruled medical education selection for decades, embedding itself as an ideological norm. We no longer question <i>why</i> it is used in applicant selection. It has become part of medical education's <i>ideology</i>, often passing ‘unseen as normal or as factual’<span><sup>3</sup></span> like water to our parabolic fish. However, the suboptimal diversity, equity and inclusion of medical education's assessment and selection practices are being increasingly recognised as a wicked problem,<span><sup>4</sup></span> leading to more frequent scrutiny of sacred (or unseen) ideologies. In response, we believe medical education should consider removing academic excellence as the gatekeeping metric to our profession.</p><p>Ostensibly, the most important stakeholders of applicant selection are learners and patients. For learners, selection represents the culmination of years of study, service and research. Selection presents a high-stakes branchpoint that dictates much of learners' future career. For patients, selection represents an accountability mechanism to ensure that future physicians are prepared for the rigours of medical training and capable of providing high-quality care. We should, then, question if relying on academic excellence serves these groups. Coyle et al's work suggests that academic excellence presents a roadblock for learners from under-privileged or minoritised backgrounds who are unfairly disadvantaged due to systematic bias. This unfairness certainly harms such learners, indicating that academic excellence is not beneficial to one of our key stakeholder groups. Patients are also harmed. Multiple studies have shown that
2005 年,美国小说家大卫-福斯特-华莱士在美国凯尼恩学院毕业典礼上发表演讲。他以一个关于两条鱼的寓言作为开场白:当然,这个故事的智慧在于,构成我们现实生活的意识形态对我们来说往往是透明的,但对其他人来说却未必如此。在本期《医学教育》(Medical Education)杂志上,科伊尔(Coyle)等人向我们提出了挑战,要求我们审视自己所处的水域。2 他们指出,医学教育一味追求学术卓越,并将其作为选择申请人的关键指标,这与医学教育在努力扩大贫困或少数民族背景人群的参与度和就医机会方面存在矛盾。作者痛心疾首地写道:"我们建议,医学院校现在应该承认,不断提高医学入学学术门槛的一些驱动因素是管理申请人数的产物,而不是什么更高尚的东西"。这种大胆的呼吁应该促使医学教育机构重新审视将学术优异作为选拔标准这一根深蒂固的做法,并重新审视这样做的理由。"几十年来,学术成绩一直主导着医学教育的选拔,并已成为一种意识形态规范。几十年来,学业成绩一直主导着医学教育的选拔,已成为一种意识形态规范。它已成为医学教育意识形态的一部分,经常被 "视为正常或事实 "3 ,就像我们抛物线上的鱼儿喝水一样。然而,人们越来越认识到,医学教育的评估和遴选实践在多样性、公平性和包容性方面不尽如人意,是一个棘手的问题4 ,导致对神圣的(或看不见的)意识形态进行更频繁的审查。作为回应,我们认为医学教育应考虑取消将学术卓越性作为我们专业的把关标准。从表面上看,申请人遴选最重要的利益相关者是学习者和患者。对于学习者来说,选拔代表着多年学习、服务和研究的顶点。遴选是一个高风险的分支点,决定了学习者未来职业生涯的大部分。对患者而言,遴选是一种问责机制,可确保未来的医生做好了接受严格医学培训的准备,并有能力提供高质量的医疗服务。因此,我们应该质疑,依赖卓越的学术成就是否有利于这些群体。科伊尔等人的研究表明,对于来自贫困或少数民族背景的学习者来说,学业优秀是一个障碍,因为系统性的偏见使他们处于不公平的不利地位。这种不公平肯定会对这些学习者造成伤害,说明卓越的学术成就对我们的主要利益相关群体之一并无益处。病人也受到伤害。多项研究表明,对少数群体而言,医疗质量的感知和临床效果的改善与病人-医生的种族一致性相关。虽然有偏见的选拔指标(如学术卓越性)导致医生队伍的多样性减少只是造成广泛的种族和民族医疗差距的一个因素,8 但这也是医学教育可以控制的一个因素。正如瓦尔皮奥写道:"幸运的是,意识形态是由我们的决定和行动来维持的;因此,我们可以改变我们的决定,从而改变意识形态,使其有利于我们,而不是反对我们。换句话说,我们选择了我们游泳的水域,我们有能力改变。"改变意识形态的一种方法是将多样性和公平性作为选拔决策有效性论证的一部分。医学教育在很大程度上认为,有效性并不是某一特定工具或手段的属性,而是一种论据,并附有支持性证据,证明某项决策、数据的解释或使用是合理的或站得住脚的。9, 10 一种经常被忽视11 但对有效性论据至关重要的证据与决策的后果有关。12 Coyle 等人展示了卓越学术如何与多元化和公平政策及倡议背道而驰。12 Coyle 等人展示了卓越的学术成就是如何与多元化和公平政策及倡议背道而驰的。如果对弱势和少数群体学习者的不公平待遇或对患者造成的负面下游影响是不可接受的(也应该是不可接受的),那么以卓越学术成就为核心的选拔决定就是无效的。豪尔(Hauer)等人曾提出,医学教育评估有效性的论据中应包括多样性和公平性的考虑因素。13 我们同意这一观点,并认为同样的考虑因素也应适用于遴选决策。
{"title":"What the hell is water? Changing medical education's ideology through validity","authors":"Benjamin Kinnear,&nbsp;Daniel J. Schumacher","doi":"10.1111/medu.15243","DOIUrl":"10.1111/medu.15243","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;In 2005, American novelist David Foster Wallace gave a commencement speech to the graduating class at Kenyon College in the United States. He opened the speech with a parable about two fish:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Of course, the wisdom in this story is that the ideologies that constitute our realities are often transparent to us, but may not be to others. Assumptions that are baked into our worldviews can keep us from questioning what may be noticeable or unusual to outsiders or novices.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In this issue of &lt;i&gt;Medical Education&lt;/i&gt;, Coyle et al challenge us to examine the waters in which we swim.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; They note that efforts to improve widening participation and access to medicine for people from under-privileged or minoritised backgrounds are at tension with medical education's preoccupation with academic excellence as a key metric for applicant selection. The authors poignantly write, ‘We suggest that it is time for medical schools to acknowledge that some of the drivers for ever higher academic thresholds for entry to medicine are artifacts of managing the number of applicants rather than anything more noble’. Such a bold call should rouse medical education to scrutinise the entrenched use of academic excellence as a selection standard by re-examining the rationale for doing so.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Academic performance has ruled medical education selection for decades, embedding itself as an ideological norm. We no longer question &lt;i&gt;why&lt;/i&gt; it is used in applicant selection. It has become part of medical education's &lt;i&gt;ideology&lt;/i&gt;, often passing ‘unseen as normal or as factual’&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;3&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; like water to our parabolic fish. However, the suboptimal diversity, equity and inclusion of medical education's assessment and selection practices are being increasingly recognised as a wicked problem,&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;4&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; leading to more frequent scrutiny of sacred (or unseen) ideologies. In response, we believe medical education should consider removing academic excellence as the gatekeeping metric to our profession.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Ostensibly, the most important stakeholders of applicant selection are learners and patients. For learners, selection represents the culmination of years of study, service and research. Selection presents a high-stakes branchpoint that dictates much of learners' future career. For patients, selection represents an accountability mechanism to ensure that future physicians are prepared for the rigours of medical training and capable of providing high-quality care. We should, then, question if relying on academic excellence serves these groups. Coyle et al's work suggests that academic excellence presents a roadblock for learners from under-privileged or minoritised backgrounds who are unfairly disadvantaged due to systematic bias. This unfairness certainly harms such learners, indicating that academic excellence is not beneficial to one of our key stakeholder groups. Patients are also harmed. Multiple studies have shown that ","PeriodicalId":18370,"journal":{"name":"Medical Education","volume":"58 3","pages":"274-276"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/medu.15243","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41106476","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Medical Education
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1