Pub Date : 2024-04-21DOI: 10.1088/0026-1394/61/1a/08009
Michal Máriássy, Zuzana Hanková, Anton Petrenko, Oleksandr Melnykov, Volodymyr Melnyk, Oleksandr Lameko, Paulo Paschoal Borges and Sidney Pereira Sobral
The subsequent key comparison K73.2018.2 was performed to demonstrate the capability of the participating institutes to measure the amount content of H+ in hydrochloric acid as a follow-up of the previous key comparison CCQM-K73.2018. A HCl solution of a slightly different composition to that in CCQM-K73.2018 was used. There were two institutes and SMU as the coordinating laboratory participating in this subsequent comparison. UkrCSM obtained results in good agreement with the reference value; INMETRO results exhibited a large bias due to a calculation error found only after disclosure of the results. To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report. Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/. The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCQM, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (CIPM MRA).
{"title":"Report of subsequent key comparison CCQM - K73.2018.2 amount content of H+ in hydrochloric acid (0.1 mol/kg-1)","authors":"Michal Máriássy, Zuzana Hanková, Anton Petrenko, Oleksandr Melnykov, Volodymyr Melnyk, Oleksandr Lameko, Paulo Paschoal Borges and Sidney Pereira Sobral","doi":"10.1088/0026-1394/61/1a/08009","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/61/1a/08009","url":null,"abstract":"The subsequent key comparison K73.2018.2 was performed to demonstrate the capability of the participating institutes to measure the amount content of H+ in hydrochloric acid as a follow-up of the previous key comparison CCQM-K73.2018. A HCl solution of a slightly different composition to that in CCQM-K73.2018 was used. There were two institutes and SMU as the coordinating laboratory participating in this subsequent comparison. UkrCSM obtained results in good agreement with the reference value; INMETRO results exhibited a large bias due to a calculation error found only after disclosure of the results. To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report. Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/. The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCQM, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (CIPM MRA).","PeriodicalId":18444,"journal":{"name":"Metrologia","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140797780","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-21DOI: 10.1088/0026-1394/61/1a/01003
Dr T Jing, Mr Thomas Hagen, Dr Steven Yang, Dr Hiroyuki Fujiki, Dr Hyung-Kew Lee, Dr Zhang Jiantao, Dr Eugene Golovins, Mr Chalit Kumtawee, Dr Muhammad Azwan Bin Ibrahim and Ms Hsiu-Ju Tsai
This report summarizes the results and performances of APMP.EM-K12, APMP key comparison of AC-DC current transfer standards of 10 mA and 5 A at frequencies of 10 Hz, 55 Hz, 1 kHz, 10 kHz, 20 kHz, 50 kHz, and 100 kHz. Ten National Metrology Institutes participated in this key comparison, including NMC/A*STAR (Singapore, pilot Laboratory), NMIA (Australia), SCL (Hong Kong, China), NMIJ (Japan), KRISS (Rep of Korea), NIM (China), NMISA (South Africa), NIMT (Thailand), NMIM (Malaysia), and CMS/ITRI (Chinese Taipei). The key comparison is linked to the CCEM one, CCCEM-K12, with same measurement quantities through the performances of two laboratories, NMC and NMIA, in both key comparisons. The degrees of equivalence of individual participating laboratories with the reference values of CCEM-K12 were thus concluded in this report. To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report. Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/. The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCEM, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (CIPM MRA).
{"title":"APMP key comparison of AC-DC current transfer standards: final report","authors":"Dr T Jing, Mr Thomas Hagen, Dr Steven Yang, Dr Hiroyuki Fujiki, Dr Hyung-Kew Lee, Dr Zhang Jiantao, Dr Eugene Golovins, Mr Chalit Kumtawee, Dr Muhammad Azwan Bin Ibrahim and Ms Hsiu-Ju Tsai","doi":"10.1088/0026-1394/61/1a/01003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/61/1a/01003","url":null,"abstract":"This report summarizes the results and performances of APMP.EM-K12, APMP key comparison of AC-DC current transfer standards of 10 mA and 5 A at frequencies of 10 Hz, 55 Hz, 1 kHz, 10 kHz, 20 kHz, 50 kHz, and 100 kHz. Ten National Metrology Institutes participated in this key comparison, including NMC/A*STAR (Singapore, pilot Laboratory), NMIA (Australia), SCL (Hong Kong, China), NMIJ (Japan), KRISS (Rep of Korea), NIM (China), NMISA (South Africa), NIMT (Thailand), NMIM (Malaysia), and CMS/ITRI (Chinese Taipei). The key comparison is linked to the CCEM one, CCCEM-K12, with same measurement quantities through the performances of two laboratories, NMC and NMIA, in both key comparisons. The degrees of equivalence of individual participating laboratories with the reference values of CCEM-K12 were thus concluded in this report. To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report. Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/. The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCEM, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (CIPM MRA).","PeriodicalId":18444,"journal":{"name":"Metrologia","volume":"153 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140798063","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-21DOI: 10.1088/0026-1394/61/1a/09002
Sun Qiao, Du Lei, Chen Yulin, Cui Shan, Mou Jianqiang, Manuel M Ruiz, Sarah Jane T Digay, Pairoj Rattanangkul, Calvin Bore, Aly Ibrahim Mostafa and Mohamed El Hawary
This is the final report for APMP supplementary comparison APMP.AUV.V-S2 in the area of 'vibration' (quantity of rotational speed). The aim of this comparison was to compare primary measurements of rotational speed in the range from 30 r/min to 99 996 r/min. Six Metrology Institutes from two RMOs, APMP and AFRIMETS, have participated in the comparison with the National Institute of Metrology, P.R. China as the pilot lab. NIM, NMC and NIS used a mechanical generator for calibration, with expanded uncertainties in the order from 10-3 to 10-5. NML, NIMT and KEBS used an optical simulator for calibration, with expanded uncertainties in the order from 10-4 to 10-5. All the participating laboratories provided their calibration results, which were all consistent within their declared expanded uncertainties for the measurement results. Each participant contributed to the SCRVs calculated for five rotational speed comparison values of two laser tachometers, NLYZ-02 and 03, except that NIS's measurement results of NLYZ-03 are invalid. Smaller measurement uncertainties than the order of 10-5 for the calibration of laser tachometers are difficult to achieve for either mechanical generators or optical simulators with the current technology of rotational speed standard devices and laser tachometers. To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report. Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/. The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCAUV, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (CIPM MRA).
{"title":"Final report of APMP.AUV.V-S2: supplementary comparison on calibration of laser tachometers using mechanical generators or optical simulators","authors":"Sun Qiao, Du Lei, Chen Yulin, Cui Shan, Mou Jianqiang, Manuel M Ruiz, Sarah Jane T Digay, Pairoj Rattanangkul, Calvin Bore, Aly Ibrahim Mostafa and Mohamed El Hawary","doi":"10.1088/0026-1394/61/1a/09002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/61/1a/09002","url":null,"abstract":"This is the final report for APMP supplementary comparison APMP.AUV.V-S2 in the area of 'vibration' (quantity of rotational speed). The aim of this comparison was to compare primary measurements of rotational speed in the range from 30 r/min to 99 996 r/min. Six Metrology Institutes from two RMOs, APMP and AFRIMETS, have participated in the comparison with the National Institute of Metrology, P.R. China as the pilot lab. NIM, NMC and NIS used a mechanical generator for calibration, with expanded uncertainties in the order from 10-3 to 10-5. NML, NIMT and KEBS used an optical simulator for calibration, with expanded uncertainties in the order from 10-4 to 10-5. All the participating laboratories provided their calibration results, which were all consistent within their declared expanded uncertainties for the measurement results. Each participant contributed to the SCRVs calculated for five rotational speed comparison values of two laser tachometers, NLYZ-02 and 03, except that NIS's measurement results of NLYZ-03 are invalid. Smaller measurement uncertainties than the order of 10-5 for the calibration of laser tachometers are difficult to achieve for either mechanical generators or optical simulators with the current technology of rotational speed standard devices and laser tachometers. To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report. Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/. The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCAUV, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (CIPM MRA).","PeriodicalId":18444,"journal":{"name":"Metrologia","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140797869","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-15DOI: 10.1088/1681-7575/ad39db
Evelyn de F Guimarães, Eliane C P Do Rego, Janaína M Rodrigues, Renato R R Almeida, Lucas J Carvalho, José Daniel Figueroa-Villar
Recertification is a common practice in National Metrology Institutes whenever advances are made in certified reference material (CRM) characterization procedures, which play a key role in metrological traceability. This article compares measurements of 16 priority polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in toluene by gas chromatography isotopic dilution mass spectrometry (IDMS) using either an calibration curve or the exact matching approach. The multi-point IDMS calibration curve was used on the original CRM certification and the exact matching approach was carried out on its recertification. The measurement uncertainties by exact matching approach (0.3%–1.0%) were approximately 5 times smaller than those obtained using the calibration curve (1.5%–4.4%) for all PAHs, reducing the uncertainty component due to characterization of PAH CRM. This new characterization study added reliability, increased accuracy and reduced the measurement uncertainty of the Inmetro CRM, with metrological traceability to the International System of Units. The exact-matching isotope dilution is an important technique to value assign organic compounds in CRMs, an action that consolidates the chemical metrology in the Brazilian Metrology Institute.
{"title":"Characterization of calibration solution certified reference material for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by exact matching isotopic dilution mass spectrometry: a case study from the Brazilian Metrology Institute","authors":"Evelyn de F Guimarães, Eliane C P Do Rego, Janaína M Rodrigues, Renato R R Almeida, Lucas J Carvalho, José Daniel Figueroa-Villar","doi":"10.1088/1681-7575/ad39db","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1681-7575/ad39db","url":null,"abstract":"Recertification is a common practice in National Metrology Institutes whenever advances are made in certified reference material (CRM) characterization procedures, which play a key role in metrological traceability. This article compares measurements of 16 priority polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in toluene by gas chromatography isotopic dilution mass spectrometry (IDMS) using either an calibration curve or the exact matching approach. The multi-point IDMS calibration curve was used on the original CRM certification and the exact matching approach was carried out on its recertification. The measurement uncertainties by exact matching approach (0.3%–1.0%) were approximately 5 times smaller than those obtained using the calibration curve (1.5%–4.4%) for all PAHs, reducing the uncertainty component due to characterization of PAH CRM. This new characterization study added reliability, increased accuracy and reduced the measurement uncertainty of the Inmetro CRM, with metrological traceability to the International System of Units. The exact-matching isotope dilution is an important technique to value assign organic compounds in CRMs, an action that consolidates the chemical metrology in the Brazilian Metrology Institute.","PeriodicalId":18444,"journal":{"name":"Metrologia","volume":"74 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140613139","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-03-25DOI: 10.1088/0026-1394/61/1a/08006
Joële Viallon, Faraz Idrees, Philippe Moussay, Robert Wielgosz, Christoph Zellweger
Main textAs part of the ongoing key comparison BIPM.QM-K1, a comparison has been performed between the ozone standard of the World Meteorological Organization maintained by the Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology (EMPA) and the common reference standard of the key comparison, maintained by the Bureau International des Poids et Mesures (BIPM). The instruments have been compared over a nominal ozone amount fraction range of 0 nmol mol−1 to 500 nmol mol−1.To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report. Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/.The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCQM, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (CIPM MRA).
{"title":"Final report, ongoing key comparison BIPM.QM-K1, ozone at ambient level, comparison with EMPA, June 2023","authors":"Joële Viallon, Faraz Idrees, Philippe Moussay, Robert Wielgosz, Christoph Zellweger","doi":"10.1088/0026-1394/61/1a/08006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/61/1a/08006","url":null,"abstract":"<title>Main text</title>As part of the ongoing key comparison BIPM.QM-K1, a comparison has been performed between the ozone standard of the World Meteorological Organization maintained by the Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology (EMPA) and the common reference standard of the key comparison, maintained by the Bureau International des Poids et Mesures (BIPM). The instruments have been compared over a nominal ozone amount fraction range of 0 nmol mol−1 to 500 nmol mol−1.To reach the main text of this paper, click on <ext-link xlink:href=\"https://www.bipm.org/documents/d/guest/bipm-qm-k1_empa_2023\" xlink:type=\"simple\">Final Report</ext-link>. Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database <ext-link xlink:href=\"https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/\" xlink:type=\"simple\">https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/</ext-link>.The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCQM, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (CIPM MRA).","PeriodicalId":18444,"journal":{"name":"Metrologia","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140315618","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-03-25DOI: 10.1088/0026-1394/61/1a/08005
Joële Viallon, Faraz Idrees, Philippe Moussay, Robert Wielgosz, Hao Jingkun, Liu Yiling
Main textAs part of the ongoing key comparison BIPM.QM-K1, a comparison has been performed between the ozone national standard of China maintained by the National Institute of Metrology (NIM) and the common reference standard of the key comparison, maintained by the Bureau International des Poids et Mesures (BIPM). The instruments have been compared over a nominal ozone amount fraction range of 0 nmol mol−1 to 500 nmol mol−1.To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report. Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/.The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCQM, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (CIPM MRA).
{"title":"Final report, ongoing key comparison BIPM.QM-K1, ozone at ambient level, comparison with NIM, Oct 2023","authors":"Joële Viallon, Faraz Idrees, Philippe Moussay, Robert Wielgosz, Hao Jingkun, Liu Yiling","doi":"10.1088/0026-1394/61/1a/08005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/61/1a/08005","url":null,"abstract":"<title>Main text</title>As part of the ongoing key comparison BIPM.QM-K1, a comparison has been performed between the ozone national standard of China maintained by the National Institute of Metrology (NIM) and the common reference standard of the key comparison, maintained by the Bureau International des Poids et Mesures (BIPM). The instruments have been compared over a nominal ozone amount fraction range of 0 nmol mol−1 to 500 nmol mol−1.To reach the main text of this paper, click on <ext-link xlink:href=\"https://www.bipm.org/documents/d/guest/bipm-qm-k1_nim_2023\" xlink:type=\"simple\">Final Report</ext-link>. Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database <ext-link xlink:href=\"https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/\" xlink:type=\"simple\">https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/</ext-link>.The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCQM, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (CIPM MRA).","PeriodicalId":18444,"journal":{"name":"Metrologia","volume":"59 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140315268","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-03-25DOI: 10.1088/0026-1394/61/1a/08007
Joële Viallon, Faraz Idrees, Philippe Moussay, Robert Wielgosz, Jesus Marval, Bryan Sweeney, Jody Cheong
Main textAs part of the ongoing key comparison BIPM.QM-K1, a comparison has been performed between the ozone national standard of United Kingdom maintained by the National Physical Laboratory (NPL) and the common reference standard of the key comparison, maintained by the Bureau International des Poids et Mesures (BIPM). The instruments have been compared over a nominal ozone amount fraction range of 0 nmol mol−1 to 500 nmol mol−1.To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report. Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/.The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCQM, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (CIPM MRA).
{"title":"Final report, ongoing key comparison BIPM.QM-K1, ozone at ambient level, comparison with NPL, June 2022","authors":"Joële Viallon, Faraz Idrees, Philippe Moussay, Robert Wielgosz, Jesus Marval, Bryan Sweeney, Jody Cheong","doi":"10.1088/0026-1394/61/1a/08007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/61/1a/08007","url":null,"abstract":"<title>Main text</title>As part of the ongoing key comparison BIPM.QM-K1, a comparison has been performed between the ozone national standard of United Kingdom maintained by the National Physical Laboratory (NPL) and the common reference standard of the key comparison, maintained by the Bureau International des Poids et Mesures (BIPM). The instruments have been compared over a nominal ozone amount fraction range of 0 nmol mol−1 to 500 nmol mol−1.To reach the main text of this paper, click on <ext-link xlink:href=\"https://www.bipm.org/documents/d/guest/bipm-qm-k1_npl_2022\" xlink:type=\"simple\">Final Report</ext-link>. Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database <ext-link xlink:href=\"https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/\" xlink:type=\"simple\">https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/</ext-link>.The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCQM, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (CIPM MRA).","PeriodicalId":18444,"journal":{"name":"Metrologia","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140316697","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-03-21DOI: 10.1088/1681-7575/ad2d5a
Freya Malcher, Ben Ford, Richard Barham, Stephen Robinson, Jake Ward, Lian Wang, Angus Bridges, Andrew Yacoot, Sei-Him Cheong, Dominique Rodrigues, Salvador Barrera-Figueroa
The demand for traceable hydrophone calibrations at low frequencies in support of ocean monitoring applications requires primary standard methods that are able to realise the acoustic pascal. In this paper, a new method for primary calibration of hydrophones is described based on the use of a calculable pistonphone to cover frequencies from 0.5 Hz to 250 Hz. The design consists of a pre-stressed piezoelectric stack driving a piston to create a varying pressure in an air-filled enclosed cavity, the displacement (and so the volume velocity) of the piston being measured by a laser interferometer. The dimensions of the front cavity were designed to allow the calibration of reference hydrophones, but it may also be used to calibrate microphones. Examples of calibration results for several sensors are presented alongside an uncertainty budget for hydrophone calibration with expanded uncertainties ranging from 0.45 dB at 0.5 Hz to 0.30 dB at 20 Hz, and to 0.35 at 250 Hz (expressed for a coverage factor of k = 2). The metrological performance is demonstrated by comparisons with results for other calibration methods and an independent implementation of primary calibration methods at other institutes.
{"title":"A calculable pistonphone for the absolute calibration of hydrophones in the frequency range from 0.5 Hz to 250 Hz","authors":"Freya Malcher, Ben Ford, Richard Barham, Stephen Robinson, Jake Ward, Lian Wang, Angus Bridges, Andrew Yacoot, Sei-Him Cheong, Dominique Rodrigues, Salvador Barrera-Figueroa","doi":"10.1088/1681-7575/ad2d5a","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1681-7575/ad2d5a","url":null,"abstract":"The demand for traceable hydrophone calibrations at low frequencies in support of ocean monitoring applications requires primary standard methods that are able to realise the acoustic pascal. In this paper, a new method for primary calibration of hydrophones is described based on the use of a calculable pistonphone to cover frequencies from 0.5 Hz to 250 Hz. The design consists of a pre-stressed piezoelectric stack driving a piston to create a varying pressure in an air-filled enclosed cavity, the displacement (and so the volume velocity) of the piston being measured by a laser interferometer. The dimensions of the front cavity were designed to allow the calibration of reference hydrophones, but it may also be used to calibrate microphones. Examples of calibration results for several sensors are presented alongside an uncertainty budget for hydrophone calibration with expanded uncertainties ranging from 0.45 dB at 0.5 Hz to 0.30 dB at 20 Hz, and to 0.35 at 250 Hz (expressed for a coverage factor of <italic toggle=\"yes\">k</italic> = 2). The metrological performance is demonstrated by comparisons with results for other calibration methods and an independent implementation of primary calibration methods at other institutes.","PeriodicalId":18444,"journal":{"name":"Metrologia","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140315277","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-03-15DOI: 10.1088/0026-1394/61/1a/07007
L Prochaska, J Rauch, A Furtado, F Benga, P Bartos, J Bebic, E Lenard, S Alisic, A Alic, P T Neuvonen, G S Sariyerli, Ü Y Akcadag, A Ciubara, A Bescupschii
Main textThe key comparison EURAMET.M.D-K2.2 (1523)on the density of liquids determined by oscillation type density meters was organized and carried out within the framework of the EMPIR project 17RPT02 "rhoLiq". Density measurements of liquids are mainly performed by laboratories calibrating or checking liquid density measuring instruments such as oscillation-type density meters. Another aim of this comparison was to establish traceability for liquid density measurements at emerging National Metrology Institutes (NMIs) to enable them to provide high-level measurement and calibration services for national stakeholders, e.g. food, chemical, pharmaceutical and petroleum industries. The results of this comparison can be used to claim calibration and measurement capabilities (CMCs).Most European emerging NMIs in this project had not yet participated in comparisons or obtained unsatisfactory results, or the uncertainty had an unfit magnitude for purpose.BEV (Austria) piloted this comparison, supported by PTB (Germany).Samples of deuterated water, tetrachloroethylene and oil of high viscosity were measured in the temperature range from 5 °C to 20 °C at atmospheric pressure by hydrostatic weighing for this comparison.The coronavirus pandemic caused delays in the proposed initial schedule of this key comparison. Measurements were performed in 2021. The reference values of the key comparison were linked to CCM.D-K2 for PTB and EURAMET.M.D-K2 for BEV.To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report. Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/.The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCM, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (CIPM MRA).
{"title":"Final report on EURAMET key comparison EURAMET.M.D-K2.2 (1523)","authors":"L Prochaska, J Rauch, A Furtado, F Benga, P Bartos, J Bebic, E Lenard, S Alisic, A Alic, P T Neuvonen, G S Sariyerli, Ü Y Akcadag, A Ciubara, A Bescupschii","doi":"10.1088/0026-1394/61/1a/07007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/61/1a/07007","url":null,"abstract":"<title>Main text</title>The key comparison EURAMET.M.D-K2.2 (1523)on the density of liquids determined by oscillation type density meters was organized and carried out within the framework of the EMPIR project 17RPT02 \"rhoLiq\". Density measurements of liquids are mainly performed by laboratories calibrating or checking liquid density measuring instruments such as oscillation-type density meters. Another aim of this comparison was to establish traceability for liquid density measurements at emerging National Metrology Institutes (NMIs) to enable them to provide high-level measurement and calibration services for national stakeholders, e.g. food, chemical, pharmaceutical and petroleum industries. The results of this comparison can be used to claim calibration and measurement capabilities (CMCs).Most European emerging NMIs in this project had not yet participated in comparisons or obtained unsatisfactory results, or the uncertainty had an unfit magnitude for purpose.BEV (Austria) piloted this comparison, supported by PTB (Germany).Samples of deuterated water, tetrachloroethylene and oil of high viscosity were measured in the temperature range from 5 °C to 20 °C at atmospheric pressure by hydrostatic weighing for this comparison.The coronavirus pandemic caused delays in the proposed initial schedule of this key comparison. Measurements were performed in 2021. The reference values of the key comparison were linked to CCM.D-K2 for PTB and EURAMET.M.D-K2 for BEV.To reach the main text of this paper, click on <ext-link xlink:href=\"https://www.bipm.org/documents/d/guest/euramet-m-d-k2-2\" xlink:type=\"simple\">Final Report</ext-link>. Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database <ext-link xlink:href=\"https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/\" xlink:type=\"simple\">https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/</ext-link>.The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCM, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (CIPM MRA).","PeriodicalId":18444,"journal":{"name":"Metrologia","volume":"49 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140315275","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-03-15DOI: 10.1088/0026-1394/61/1a/07005
Luis Omar Becerra Santiago, Sheila Preste, Luis Manuel Peña Perez
Main textThe aim of this comparison was to compare measurement results on liquid density at 20°C and at atmospheric pressure among National Metrology Institutes (NMIs) belonging to the Inter-American Metrology System (SIM, by its acronym in Spanish).To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report. Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/.The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCM, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (CIPM MRA).
{"title":"Comparison of liquid density measurements among SIM NMIs - SIM.M.D-S7","authors":"Luis Omar Becerra Santiago, Sheila Preste, Luis Manuel Peña Perez","doi":"10.1088/0026-1394/61/1a/07005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/61/1a/07005","url":null,"abstract":"<title>Main text</title>The aim of this comparison was to compare measurement results on liquid density at 20°C and at atmospheric pressure among National Metrology Institutes (NMIs) belonging to the Inter-American Metrology System (SIM, by its acronym in Spanish).To reach the main text of this paper, click on <ext-link xlink:href=\"https://www.bipm.org/documents/d/guest/sim-m-d-s7\" xlink:type=\"simple\">Final Report</ext-link>. Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database <ext-link xlink:href=\"https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/\" xlink:type=\"simple\">https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/</ext-link>.The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCM, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (CIPM MRA).","PeriodicalId":18444,"journal":{"name":"Metrologia","volume":"51 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140315273","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：