首页 > 最新文献

Metrologia最新文献

英文 中文
Report on EURAMET supplementary comparison on measurement of a 1 mm stage micrometer 关于欧洲原子能共同体 1 毫米台阶测微计测量补充比对的报告
IF 2.4 3区 工程技术 Q2 INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION Pub Date : 2024-06-23 DOI: 10.1088/0026-1394/61/1a/04003
M Matus, M del Mar Pérez, E Prieto, A Germak, D Czułek, P Sosinowski, A Duță, E Dugheanu, S Zelenika, M Äremann, B Ozgur, M Asar, P Greeff, K Manana, S Sun, J Buajarern, D A Brasil, B Gastaldi and G Zechner
The results of the EURAMET supplementary comparison on the calibration of a 1 mm stage micrometer are reported. 13 NMIs from 4 RMOs participated in the comparison. Originally, the comparison was planned to use a single artefact. Because it was destroyed during the duration of the comparison, it was necessary to carry out the test in two loops using a new artefact. Artefact circulation started in August 2020 and was completed in September 2022. Both artefacts were the same make and kind. The two artefacts are standard stage micrometers as used in optical microscopy on a transparent, low thermal expansion substrate. The scale length is 1 mm divided in 100 parts. The distances of all 100 scale marks from the zero mark have been measured by each participant. The results with associated uncertainties of all participating NMIs were in good agreement. All En values were smaller than 1 already from the pre-draft A state on. Therefore, no separate analysis of a largest consistent subset was necessary. With 1400 values without a single outlier, it is tempting to assume that uncertainty contributions are somehow overestimated. To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report. Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/. The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCL, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (CIPM MRA).
报告了欧洲原子能共同体 1 毫米台阶测微计校准补充比对的结果。来自 4 个 RMO 的 13 个 NMI 参加了比对。比对最初计划使用一个人工制品。由于该工件在比对期间被毁坏,因此有必要使用一个新工件分两个循环进行测试。人工制品循环于 2020 年 8 月开始,2022 年 9 月完成。两个人工制品的型号和种类相同。这两个人工制品是光学显微镜中使用的标准平台测微器,安装在透明、热膨胀率低的基底上。刻度长度为 1 毫米,分为 100 份。每位参赛者都测量了所有 100 个刻度线距零点的距离。所有参与 NMI 的结果与相关的不确定性非常一致。从预稿 A 状态开始,所有 En 值都小于 1。因此,无需对最大一致子集进行单独分析。1400 个数值中没有一个离群值,这很容易让人认为不确定性的贡献在某种程度上被高估了。要阅读本文正文,请点击最终报告。请注意,此文本是 BIPM 关键比对数据库 https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/ 附录 B 中的文本。根据 CIPM 互认安排 (CIPM MRA) 的规定,最终报告已通过同行评审,并批准由 CCL 出版。
{"title":"Report on EURAMET supplementary comparison on measurement of a 1 mm stage micrometer","authors":"M Matus, M del Mar Pérez, E Prieto, A Germak, D Czułek, P Sosinowski, A Duță, E Dugheanu, S Zelenika, M Äremann, B Ozgur, M Asar, P Greeff, K Manana, S Sun, J Buajarern, D A Brasil, B Gastaldi and G Zechner","doi":"10.1088/0026-1394/61/1a/04003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/61/1a/04003","url":null,"abstract":"The results of the EURAMET supplementary comparison on the calibration of a 1 mm stage micrometer are reported. 13 NMIs from 4 RMOs participated in the comparison. Originally, the comparison was planned to use a single artefact. Because it was destroyed during the duration of the comparison, it was necessary to carry out the test in two loops using a new artefact. Artefact circulation started in August 2020 and was completed in September 2022. Both artefacts were the same make and kind. The two artefacts are standard stage micrometers as used in optical microscopy on a transparent, low thermal expansion substrate. The scale length is 1 mm divided in 100 parts. The distances of all 100 scale marks from the zero mark have been measured by each participant. The results with associated uncertainties of all participating NMIs were in good agreement. All En values were smaller than 1 already from the pre-draft A state on. Therefore, no separate analysis of a largest consistent subset was necessary. With 1400 values without a single outlier, it is tempting to assume that uncertainty contributions are somehow overestimated. To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report. Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/. The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCL, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (CIPM MRA).","PeriodicalId":18444,"journal":{"name":"Metrologia","volume":"53 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141522302","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Corrigendum: Corrections to a proposal for three categories of units within the SI (2024 Metrologia 61 033001) 更正件:对国际单位制内三类单位建议的更正(2024 Metrologia 61 033001)
IF 2.4 3区 工程技术 Q2 INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION Pub Date : 2024-06-23 DOI: 10.1088/1681-7575/ad57cc
John Lehman, Alan Migdall, Julia Scherschligt and Lorne Whitehead
In this corrigendum, we correct several typographical or typesetting errors and small but meaningful errors in tables 1, A.1 and A.3 found in the original manuscript. We emphasize as a correction that the Avogadro constant is not a dimensionless number. The corrections are placed according to the original organization: section 2, references, and appendix.
在本更正中,我们纠正了原稿中的几处印刷或排版错误,以及表 1、A.1 和 A.3 中的一些虽小但有意义的错误。作为更正,我们强调阿伏加德罗常数不是无量纲数。这些更正按照原稿的编排方式放置:第 2 节、参考文献和附录。
{"title":"Corrigendum: Corrections to a proposal for three categories of units within the SI (2024 Metrologia 61 033001)","authors":"John Lehman, Alan Migdall, Julia Scherschligt and Lorne Whitehead","doi":"10.1088/1681-7575/ad57cc","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1681-7575/ad57cc","url":null,"abstract":"In this corrigendum, we correct several typographical or typesetting errors and small but meaningful errors in tables 1, A.1 and A.3 found in the original manuscript. We emphasize as a correction that the Avogadro constant is not a dimensionless number. The corrections are placed according to the original organization: section 2, references, and appendix.","PeriodicalId":18444,"journal":{"name":"Metrologia","volume":"76 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141531599","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
CCQM-K160: Platinum Group Elements in Automotive Catalyst CCQM-K160:汽车催化剂中的铂族元素
IF 2.4 3区 工程技术 Q2 INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION Pub Date : 2024-06-16 DOI: 10.1088/0026-1394/61/1a/08011
Sarah Hill, Heidi Goenaga Infante, John Entwisle, Stanislav Strekopytov, Christian Ward-Deitrich, Simon Cowen, Olaf Rienitz, Anita Roethke, Volker Goerlitz, Ursula Schulz, Carola Pape, Jochen Vogl, Maren Koenig, Radojko Jacimovic, Paola Fisicaro, Tongxiang Ren, Song Wang, Panshu Song, Haifeng Li, Maré Linsky, Egor Sobina, Hernán Ezequiel Lozano, Mabel Puelles, Randa Yamani and Conny Haraldsson
The platinum group elements (PGEs) play an important role in reducing emissions from automotive vehicles through their use in catalytic convertors but also for catalysis in the pharmaceutical industry. The immense economic value of platinum (Pt), palladium (Pd) and rhodium (Rh) highlights the importance of highly accurate measurements. Therefore, there is a need for National Metrology Institutes (NMIs) and Designated Institutes (DIs) to demonstrate measurement capability in this space. A pilot comparison (CCQM-P63) for precious metals in automotive catalyst took place in 2006, but with a limited number of institutes participating. Furthermore, this study was performed over 17 years ago. Therefore, there was a need to maintain existing capability and demonstrate new capability in a key comparison, in order to claim calibration and measurement capability claims (CMCs). With the core capability matrix, this study falls into the "Difficult to dissolve metals/metal oxides" which will support CMC categories 8 (Metal and metal alloys), 9 (Advanced materials) and 14 (Other materials). Eleven NMIs and DIs participated in the Key Comparison CCQM-K160 Platinum Group Elements in Automotive Catalyst. Participants were requested to evaluate the mass fractions of Pt, Pd and Rh in mg/kg in an unused autocatalyst material (cordierite ceramic base). The Key Comparison Reference Values (KCRVs) and Degrees of Equivalence (DoEs) were calculated utilising the NIST Decision Tree for the measurands. The participants utilised a number of sample preparation and analytical methods including hot plate digestion, microwave digestion and sodium fusion, followed by either atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS), inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES) or inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) detection. Several calibration techniques were used, namely external calibration, standard addition, isotope dilution mass spectrometry (IDMS) and an exact matching procedure. Additionally, one participant employed instrumental neutron activation analysis (INAA) with k0 standardisation which is a direct solid analysis method. The majority of participants claimed traceability to NIST primary calibrants or their own CRMs. Furthermore, several matrix CRMs were included or spiked samples for quality control. All institutes were required to determine the dry mass fraction using the stipulated protocol. The NIST decision tree was implemented for the calculation of the KCRVs and DoEs. The participant results overall showed good agreement with the KCRV, despite the variety of dissolution procedures and measurement techniques for this highly complex matrix and challenging measurands. Successful participation in CCQM-K160 demonstrated measurement capabilities for the determination of mass fraction of Pt, Pd and Rh in the mg/kg range and will support broad scope CMC claims for a wide range of challenging matrices. To reach the main text of this paper, click on
铂族元素(PGEs)通过在催化转换器中的使用,在减少汽车尾气排放方面发挥着重要作用,同时也用于制药业的催化反应。铂 (Pt)、钯 (Pd) 和铑 (Rh) 的巨大经济价值凸显了高精度测量的重要性。因此,国家计量院(NMI)和指定机构(DI)有必要展示这一领域的测量能力。2006 年进行了汽车催化剂中贵金属的试点比对(CCQM-P63),但参与的机构数量有限。此外,这项研究是 17 年前进行的。因此,有必要在关键比对中保持现有能力并展示新能力,以申请校准和测量能力声明(CMC)。根据核心能力矩阵,这项研究属于 "难溶解金属/金属氧化物",将支持 CMC 类别 8(金属和金属合金)、9(先进材料)和 14(其他材料)。11 个国家监测机构和指定机构参加了关键对比 CCQM-K160 汽车催化剂中的铂族元素。要求参与者评估未使用过的汽车催化剂材料(堇青石陶瓷基底)中铂、钯和铑的质量分数(以毫克/千克为单位)。关键比较参考值 (KCRV) 和等效度 (DoE) 是利用 NIST 的决策树计算出来的。参与者采用了多种样品制备和分析方法,包括热板消解、微波消解和钠融合,然后进行原子吸收光谱(AAS)、电感耦合等离子体光发射光谱(ICP-OES)或电感耦合等离子体质谱(ICP-MS)检测。使用了几种校准技术,即外部校准、标准添加、同位素稀释质谱法 (IDMS) 和精确匹配程序。此外,一位与会者采用了 k0 标准化的仪器中子活化分析(INAA),这是一种直接的固体分析方法。大多数与会者声称可追溯到 NIST 初级校准器或他们自己的有证标准物质。此外,还包括一些基质有证标准物质或用于质量控制的加标样品。所有机构都必须使用规定的规程测定干质量分数。在计算 KCRV 和 DoE 时采用了 NIST 决策树。尽管针对这种高度复杂的基质和具有挑战性的测量物采用了多种溶解程序和测量技术,但参与者的结果总体上与 KCRV 非常吻合。成功参与 CCQM-K160 证明了测定毫克/千克范围内的铂、钯和铑质量分数的测量能力,并将支持各种具有挑战性基质的广泛 CMC 声明。要阅读本文正文,请点击最终报告。请注意,该文本是 BIPM 关键对比数据库 https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/ 附录 B 中的文本。根据 CIPM 互认安排 (CIPM MRA) 的规定,最终报告已通过同行评审,并批准由 CCQM 出版。
{"title":"CCQM-K160: Platinum Group Elements in Automotive Catalyst","authors":"Sarah Hill, Heidi Goenaga Infante, John Entwisle, Stanislav Strekopytov, Christian Ward-Deitrich, Simon Cowen, Olaf Rienitz, Anita Roethke, Volker Goerlitz, Ursula Schulz, Carola Pape, Jochen Vogl, Maren Koenig, Radojko Jacimovic, Paola Fisicaro, Tongxiang Ren, Song Wang, Panshu Song, Haifeng Li, Maré Linsky, Egor Sobina, Hernán Ezequiel Lozano, Mabel Puelles, Randa Yamani and Conny Haraldsson","doi":"10.1088/0026-1394/61/1a/08011","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/61/1a/08011","url":null,"abstract":"The platinum group elements (PGEs) play an important role in reducing emissions from automotive vehicles through their use in catalytic convertors but also for catalysis in the pharmaceutical industry. The immense economic value of platinum (Pt), palladium (Pd) and rhodium (Rh) highlights the importance of highly accurate measurements. Therefore, there is a need for National Metrology Institutes (NMIs) and Designated Institutes (DIs) to demonstrate measurement capability in this space. A pilot comparison (CCQM-P63) for precious metals in automotive catalyst took place in 2006, but with a limited number of institutes participating. Furthermore, this study was performed over 17 years ago. Therefore, there was a need to maintain existing capability and demonstrate new capability in a key comparison, in order to claim calibration and measurement capability claims (CMCs). With the core capability matrix, this study falls into the \"Difficult to dissolve metals/metal oxides\" which will support CMC categories 8 (Metal and metal alloys), 9 (Advanced materials) and 14 (Other materials). Eleven NMIs and DIs participated in the Key Comparison CCQM-K160 Platinum Group Elements in Automotive Catalyst. Participants were requested to evaluate the mass fractions of Pt, Pd and Rh in mg/kg in an unused autocatalyst material (cordierite ceramic base). The Key Comparison Reference Values (KCRVs) and Degrees of Equivalence (DoEs) were calculated utilising the NIST Decision Tree for the measurands. The participants utilised a number of sample preparation and analytical methods including hot plate digestion, microwave digestion and sodium fusion, followed by either atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS), inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES) or inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) detection. Several calibration techniques were used, namely external calibration, standard addition, isotope dilution mass spectrometry (IDMS) and an exact matching procedure. Additionally, one participant employed instrumental neutron activation analysis (INAA) with k0 standardisation which is a direct solid analysis method. The majority of participants claimed traceability to NIST primary calibrants or their own CRMs. Furthermore, several matrix CRMs were included or spiked samples for quality control. All institutes were required to determine the dry mass fraction using the stipulated protocol. The NIST decision tree was implemented for the calculation of the KCRVs and DoEs. The participant results overall showed good agreement with the KCRV, despite the variety of dissolution procedures and measurement techniques for this highly complex matrix and challenging measurands. Successful participation in CCQM-K160 demonstrated measurement capabilities for the determination of mass fraction of Pt, Pd and Rh in the mg/kg range and will support broad scope CMC claims for a wide range of challenging matrices. To reach the main text of this paper, click on ","PeriodicalId":18444,"journal":{"name":"Metrologia","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141549502","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
171Yb+ optical clock with 2.2×10−18 systematic uncertainty and absolute frequency measurements 具有 2.2×10-18 系统不确定性的 171Yb+ 光学时钟和绝对频率测量结果
IF 2.4 3区 工程技术 Q2 INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION Pub Date : 2024-06-16 DOI: 10.1088/1681-7575/ad53cd
A Tofful, C F A Baynham, E A Curtis, A O Parsons, B I Robertson, M Schioppo, J Tunesi, H S Margolis, R J Hendricks, J Whale, R C Thompson and R M Godun
A full evaluation of the uncertainty budget for the ytterbium ion optical clock at the National Physical Laboratory (NPL) was performed on the electric octupole (E3) transition. The total systematic frequency shift was measured with a fractional standard systematic uncertainty of . Furthermore, the absolute frequency of the E3 transition of the 171Yb+ ion was measured between 2019 and 2023 via a link to International Atomic Time (TAI) and against the local caesium fountain NPL-CsF2. The absolute frequencies were measured with fractional standard uncertainties between and , and all were in agreement with the 2021 BIPM recommended frequency.
对美国国家物理实验室(NPL)镱离子光学时钟的电八极子(E3)转变的不确定性预算进行了全面评估。此外,2019 年至 2023 年期间,通过与国际原子时(TAI)的链接,并根据本地铯泉 NPL-CsF2 测量了 171Yb+ 离子 E3 转变的绝对频率。测量到的绝对频率的分数标准不确定性介于 和 之间,均与 2021 年国际计量局建议的频率一致。
{"title":"171Yb+ optical clock with 2.2×10−18 systematic uncertainty and absolute frequency measurements","authors":"A Tofful, C F A Baynham, E A Curtis, A O Parsons, B I Robertson, M Schioppo, J Tunesi, H S Margolis, R J Hendricks, J Whale, R C Thompson and R M Godun","doi":"10.1088/1681-7575/ad53cd","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1681-7575/ad53cd","url":null,"abstract":"A full evaluation of the uncertainty budget for the ytterbium ion optical clock at the National Physical Laboratory (NPL) was performed on the electric octupole (E3) transition. The total systematic frequency shift was measured with a fractional standard systematic uncertainty of . Furthermore, the absolute frequency of the E3 transition of the 171Yb+ ion was measured between 2019 and 2023 via a link to International Atomic Time (TAI) and against the local caesium fountain NPL-CsF2. The absolute frequencies were measured with fractional standard uncertainties between and , and all were in agreement with the 2021 BIPM recommended frequency.","PeriodicalId":18444,"journal":{"name":"Metrologia","volume":"63 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141531600","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparison of local realizations of Silver freezing-point temperatures between NMIA and NMIJ AIST NMIA 和 NMIJ AIST 之间白银凝固点温度的本地化比较
IF 2.4 3区 工程技术 Q2 INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION Pub Date : 2024-06-16 DOI: 10.1088/0026-1394/61/1a/03004
M-K Ho and J V Widiatmo
The key comparison CCT-K4.1 was initiated on the request of the National Measurement Institute, Australia (MNIA) to re-link their standards to the Consultative Committee for Thermometry (CCT) Key Comparison (KC) and facilitate the NMIA CMC submission. National Metrology Institute of Japan, Japan (NMIJ) provided the linkage to the CCT-K4 at the temperature of the freezing point of silver. At the time of the CCT-K4 NMIA (formerly CSIRO-NML) had only one silver cell and this was found to be contaminated shortly after completion. Subsequently, more silver cells were fabricated at different times to form an ensemble of five cells before the start of CCT.K4.1. In the CCT-K4.1 bi-lateral comparison, a silver cell provided by NMIA and used as the artefact and circulated in accordance with the pilot-participant-pilot scheme. It is standard practice for NMIJ to use argon at 6N purity and NMIA argon 5N purity to regulate the pressure in the silver cell. To mitigate this, the effect of different argon purity was assessed in the post-circulation measurements. First the comparison was made under 6N purity atmosphere to preserve the cell ambience after it left NMIJ then the measurement was repeated under 5N argon atmosphere. The linkage was based on the temperature of NMIJ reference Ag fixed point relative to the key comparison reference value (KCRV) of CCT-K4 at the Ag fixed point via the difference in temperature between the NMIA reference Ag fixed point and NMIJ reference Ag fixed point (links to the KCRV of the CCT-K4). The temperature difference between the standards of NMIA and the KCRV of the CCT-K4 was within the evaluated comparison uncertainties of the CCT-K4.1. This report provides detailed information on the comparison results, linkage mechanism, and the Degree of Equivalence of NMIA relative to the institutes having participated in the CCT-K4. To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report. Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/. The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCT, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (CIPM MRA).
关键比对 CCT-K4.1 是应澳大利亚国家计量研究院 (MNIA) 的要求发起的,目的是将其标准与温度测量咨询委员会 (CCT) 的关键比对 (KC) 重新链接,并方便 NMIA 提交 CMC。日本国家计量研究院(NMIJ)提供了银凝固点温度与 CCT-K4 的链接。在 CCT-K4 完成时,NMIA(前身为 CSIRO-NML)只有一个银电池,而且在完成后不久就发现受到污染。随后,在 CCT.K4.1 开始之前,又在不同时间制造了更多的银电池,形成了五个银电池的组合。在 CCT-K4.1 双侧对比中,使用了 NMIA 提供的银电池作为人工制品,并按照试点--参与方--试点计划进行了流通。NMIJ 的标准做法是使用纯度为 6N 的氩气和 NMIA 纯度为 5N 的氩气来调节银电池中的压力。为了减轻这种情况,在后循环测量中评估了不同氩气纯度的影响。首先在 6N 纯度气氛下进行比较,以保持银电池离开 NMIJ 后的环境,然后在 5N 氩气气氛下重复测量。通过 NMIA 参考银定点和 NMIJ 参考银定点之间的温度差(与 CCT-K4 的 KCRV 相联系),根据 NMIJ 参考银定点的温度与 CCT-K4 在银定点的关键比较参考值 (KCRV) 相联系。NMIA 标准与 CCT-K4 的 KCRV 之间的温度差在 CCT-K4.1 的评估比较不确定度范围内。本报告详细介绍了比对结果、联动机制以及 NMIA 相对于参与 CCT-K4 的机构的等效度。要阅读本文正文,请点击最终报告。请注意,该文本是 BIPM 关键对比数据库 https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/ 附录 B 中的文本。根据 CIPM 互认安排(CIPM MRA)的规定,最终报告已经过同行评审,并获准由 CCT 发布。
{"title":"Comparison of local realizations of Silver freezing-point temperatures between NMIA and NMIJ AIST","authors":"M-K Ho and J V Widiatmo","doi":"10.1088/0026-1394/61/1a/03004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/61/1a/03004","url":null,"abstract":"The key comparison CCT-K4.1 was initiated on the request of the National Measurement Institute, Australia (MNIA) to re-link their standards to the Consultative Committee for Thermometry (CCT) Key Comparison (KC) and facilitate the NMIA CMC submission. National Metrology Institute of Japan, Japan (NMIJ) provided the linkage to the CCT-K4 at the temperature of the freezing point of silver. At the time of the CCT-K4 NMIA (formerly CSIRO-NML) had only one silver cell and this was found to be contaminated shortly after completion. Subsequently, more silver cells were fabricated at different times to form an ensemble of five cells before the start of CCT.K4.1. In the CCT-K4.1 bi-lateral comparison, a silver cell provided by NMIA and used as the artefact and circulated in accordance with the pilot-participant-pilot scheme. It is standard practice for NMIJ to use argon at 6N purity and NMIA argon 5N purity to regulate the pressure in the silver cell. To mitigate this, the effect of different argon purity was assessed in the post-circulation measurements. First the comparison was made under 6N purity atmosphere to preserve the cell ambience after it left NMIJ then the measurement was repeated under 5N argon atmosphere. The linkage was based on the temperature of NMIJ reference Ag fixed point relative to the key comparison reference value (KCRV) of CCT-K4 at the Ag fixed point via the difference in temperature between the NMIA reference Ag fixed point and NMIJ reference Ag fixed point (links to the KCRV of the CCT-K4). The temperature difference between the standards of NMIA and the KCRV of the CCT-K4 was within the evaluated comparison uncertainties of the CCT-K4.1. This report provides detailed information on the comparison results, linkage mechanism, and the Degree of Equivalence of NMIA relative to the institutes having participated in the CCT-K4. To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report. Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/. The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCT, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (CIPM MRA).","PeriodicalId":18444,"journal":{"name":"Metrologia","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141549491","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
PAWG pilot study on quantification of total haemoglobin in blood PAWG 关于血液中总血红蛋白定量的试点研究
IF 2.4 3区 工程技术 Q2 INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION Pub Date : 2024-05-28 DOI: 10.1088/0026-1394/61/1a/08010
C Swart, P J Beltrão, S M Naressi Scapin, Y Bacila Sade, M Neves de Medeiros, J-S Jeong, Y Jin, Y Liu, L Feng, X Gong, L Feng, M Winchester, L Yu, C Arsene, A Schulze, R Ohlendorf and C Brauckmann
Under the auspices of the Protein Analysis Working Group (PAWG) of the Comité Consultatif pour la Quantité de Matière (CCQM) a pilot study, CCQM-P201, was organised. Five National Metrology Institutes (NMIs) participated in this pilot study and provided a total of eleven measurement results using six different methods based on three different measurement principles. The purpose of this pilot study was to develop measurement capabilities for the accurate quantification of intact haemoglobin (Hb) whereby measurement results could be made directly traceable to the SI. The choice of protein resulted from its ability to be quantified via different measurement principles providing different routes of traceability. Hb also provided a model of an intact protein with a complex tetrameric structure which is often measured via quantification of a specific subunit or the incorporated haem group. To achieve appropriate results for the chosen measurand, it was necessary to distinguish between the whole protein and fragments of the tetrameric structure, such as dimers or monomers. The participants were encouraged to investigate several of the measurement methods available. This was considered particularly advantageous in this instance as various methods applied to the same analyte may assist in identifying possible previously unknown biases or interferences of the various methods. Hb is being used as a model system to build capacity in methods for the quantification of proteins with a molar mass ≤ 100 kDa in biological fluids in a concentration range > 1∙106 pmol/g. This was the first pilot study for the quantification of an inherent protein in blood with all the natural variations that protein shows in a clinical sample. The different methods applied by the participants included isotopic dilution (ID) organic mass spectrometry (MS) of specific peptides after tryptic digestion, species-specific ID inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS), post-column ID ICP-MS, quantification via total iron after chromatographic isolation of Hb and acid digestion as well as two optical methods. One of the latter was the reference method proposed by the International Committee for Standardisation in Haematology (ICSH) based on the conversion of Hb to hemiglobincyanide (HiCN), the other used the conversion of Hb with alkaline haematin detergent both followed by the measurement of spectroscopic absorbance. Considering the use of very different measurement techniques for the quantification of total Hb, the results are in good agreement with a reference value with corresponding expanded uncertainty of (120.6 ± 1.2) mg/g calculated as DerSimonian-Laird mean. However, the observed differences between the results are not completely reflected in the reported measurement uncertainties. The calculated interlaboratory standard deviation or Tau value (dark uncertainty) was approximately 3 % whilst the average reported measurement uncertainty was approximately half this (1.4 %).
在材料定量咨询委员会(CCQM)蛋白质分析工作组(PAWG)的支持下,组织了一项名为 CCQM-P201 的试点研究。五个国家计量机构(NMI)参加了这项试点研究,并根据三种不同的测量原则,使用六种不同的方法提供了总共 11 项测量结果。这项试点研究的目的是开发精确定量完整血红蛋白(Hb)的测量能力,使测量结果可以直接溯源到 SI。之所以选择蛋白质,是因为它能够通过不同的测量原理进行量化,从而提供不同的溯源途径。Hb 还提供了一个具有复杂四聚体结构的完整蛋白质模型,通常通过对特定亚基或结合的血红素基团进行定量测量。为了获得所选测量剂的适当结果,有必要区分整个蛋白质和四聚体结构的片段,如二聚体或单体。我们鼓励学员研究几种可用的测量方法。在这种情况下,他们认为这样做特别有利,因为对同一分析物采用不同的方法可能有助于确定各种方法中可能存在的先前未知的偏差或干扰。血红蛋白被用作一个模型系统,用于建立生物液体中摩尔质量≤ 100 kDa 的蛋白质的定量方法能力,其浓度范围 > 1∙106 pmol/g。这是首次对血液中的固有蛋白质进行定量的试验性研究,因为蛋白质在临床样本中会出现各种自然变化。参与者采用的不同方法包括:胰蛋白酶消化后特定肽的同位素稀释(ID)有机质谱(MS)、物种特异性 ID 电感耦合等离子体质谱(ICP-MS)、柱后 ID ICP-MS、通过色谱分离 Hb 和酸消化后的总铁进行定量,以及两种光学方法。其中一种是由国际血液学标准化委员会(ICSH)提出的参考方法,该方法基于将 Hb 转化为血红蛋白氰化物(HiCN),另一种则使用碱性血清洗涤剂将 Hb 转化,然后测量光谱吸光度。考虑到总血红蛋白的定量使用了截然不同的测量技术,结果与参考值非常吻合,相应的扩大不确定度为 (120.6 ± 1.2) mg/g,计算方法为 DerSimonian-Laird 平均值。然而,观察到的结果之间的差异并没有完全反映在报告的测量不确定度中。计算得出的实验室间标准偏差或 Tau 值(暗不确定度)约为 3%,而报告的平均测量不确定度约为其一半(1.4%)。造成这种巨大差异的一个可能原因是低估了所测量的目标分析物与所要求的测量物之间的任何必要转换因子及其不确定性贡献。要阅读本文正文,请点击最终报告。请注意,该文本是 BIPM 关键比对数据库 https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/ 附录 B 中的文本。根据 CIPM 互认安排 (CIPM MRA) 的规定,最终报告已由 CCQM 进行同行评审并批准出版。
{"title":"PAWG pilot study on quantification of total haemoglobin in blood","authors":"C Swart, P J Beltrão, S M Naressi Scapin, Y Bacila Sade, M Neves de Medeiros, J-S Jeong, Y Jin, Y Liu, L Feng, X Gong, L Feng, M Winchester, L Yu, C Arsene, A Schulze, R Ohlendorf and C Brauckmann","doi":"10.1088/0026-1394/61/1a/08010","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/61/1a/08010","url":null,"abstract":"Under the auspices of the Protein Analysis Working Group (PAWG) of the Comité Consultatif pour la Quantité de Matière (CCQM) a pilot study, CCQM-P201, was organised. Five National Metrology Institutes (NMIs) participated in this pilot study and provided a total of eleven measurement results using six different methods based on three different measurement principles. The purpose of this pilot study was to develop measurement capabilities for the accurate quantification of intact haemoglobin (Hb) whereby measurement results could be made directly traceable to the SI. The choice of protein resulted from its ability to be quantified via different measurement principles providing different routes of traceability. Hb also provided a model of an intact protein with a complex tetrameric structure which is often measured via quantification of a specific subunit or the incorporated haem group. To achieve appropriate results for the chosen measurand, it was necessary to distinguish between the whole protein and fragments of the tetrameric structure, such as dimers or monomers. The participants were encouraged to investigate several of the measurement methods available. This was considered particularly advantageous in this instance as various methods applied to the same analyte may assist in identifying possible previously unknown biases or interferences of the various methods. Hb is being used as a model system to build capacity in methods for the quantification of proteins with a molar mass ≤ 100 kDa in biological fluids in a concentration range > 1∙106 pmol/g. This was the first pilot study for the quantification of an inherent protein in blood with all the natural variations that protein shows in a clinical sample. The different methods applied by the participants included isotopic dilution (ID) organic mass spectrometry (MS) of specific peptides after tryptic digestion, species-specific ID inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS), post-column ID ICP-MS, quantification via total iron after chromatographic isolation of Hb and acid digestion as well as two optical methods. One of the latter was the reference method proposed by the International Committee for Standardisation in Haematology (ICSH) based on the conversion of Hb to hemiglobincyanide (HiCN), the other used the conversion of Hb with alkaline haematin detergent both followed by the measurement of spectroscopic absorbance. Considering the use of very different measurement techniques for the quantification of total Hb, the results are in good agreement with a reference value with corresponding expanded uncertainty of (120.6 ± 1.2) mg/g calculated as DerSimonian-Laird mean. However, the observed differences between the results are not completely reflected in the reported measurement uncertainties. The calculated interlaboratory standard deviation or Tau value (dark uncertainty) was approximately 3 % whilst the average reported measurement uncertainty was approximately half this (1.4 %).","PeriodicalId":18444,"journal":{"name":"Metrologia","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141171620","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Bilateral comparison of 1.018 V and 10 V standards between SASO-NMCC (Saudi Arabia) and the BIPM, September to November 2023 (part of the ongoing BIPM key comparison BIPM.EM-K11.a and b) SASO-NMCC (沙特阿拉伯)与 BIPM 之间的 1.018 V 和 10 V 标准双边比较,2023 年 9 月至 11 月(BIPM.EM-K11.a 和 b 正在进行的关键比较的一部分)。
IF 2.4 3区 工程技术 Q2 INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION Pub Date : 2024-05-27 DOI: 10.1088/0026-1394/61/1a/01005
S Solve, R Chayramy, M Stock, A Alrobaish and A Aljomaie
As part of the ongoing BIPM key comparison BIPM.EM-K11.a and b, a comparison of the 1.018 V and 10 V voltage reference standards of the BIPM and the SASO-NMCC (Saudi Arabia), from September to November 2023. Two BIPM Zener diode-based travelling standards (Fluke 732B), BIPM_E (ZE) and BIPM_F (ZF), were transported by freight to the SASO-NMCC and back to the BIPM. In order to keep the Zeners powered during their transportation phase, a voltage stabiliser developed by the BIPM was connected in parallel to the internal battery. At the SASO-NMCC and the BIPM, the reference standard for DC voltage is a Programmable Josephson Voltage Standard (PJVS). The output electromotive force (EMF) of each travelling standard was measured by direct comparison with the primary standard. The final result of the comparison is presented as the difference between the values assigned to DC voltage standards by the SASO-NMCC, at the level of 1.018 V and 10 V, at the SASO-NMCC, USASO-NMCC, and those assigned by the BIPM, at the BIPM, UBIPM, at the reference date of the 30th of September 2023. USASO-NMCC - UBIPM = 0.06 V; uc = 0.05 V, at 1.018 V USASO-NMCC - UBIPM = 0.22 V; uc = 0.12 V, at 10 V where uc is the combined standard uncertainty associated with the measured difference, including the uncertainty of the realisation of the volt at the BIPM and at the SASO-NMCC, and the uncertainty related to the comparison. To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report. Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/. The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCEM, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (CIPM MRA).
作为正在进行的 BIPM 关键比较 BIPM.EM-K11.a 和 b 的一部分,从 2023 年 9 月至 11 月,对 BIPM 和 SASO-NMCC(沙特阿拉伯)的 1.018 V 和 10 V 电压基准标准进行了比较。两个基于齐纳二极管的 BIPM 旅行标准(Fluke 732B),BIPM_E (ZE) 和 BIPM_F (ZF),通过货运运往 SASO-NMCC,然后再运回 BIPM。为了使 Zener 在运输阶段保持供电,BIPM 开发的稳压器与内部电池并联。在 SASO-NMCC 和 BIPM,直流电压的参考标准是可编程约瑟夫森电压标准(PJVS)。每个巡回标准的输出电动势 (EMF) 都是通过与主标准直接比较来测量的。比较的最终结果以 SASO-NMCC、USASO-NMCC 分配的 1.018 V 和 10 V 等级直流电压标准值与 BIPM、BIPM、UBIPM 分配的直流电压标准值在 2023 年 9 月 30 日基准日期的差值表示。USASO-NMCC - UBIPM = 0.06 V; uc = 0.05 V, at 1.018 V USASO-NMCC - UBIPM = 0.22 V; uc = 0.12 V, at 10 V 其中 uc 是与测量差异相关的综合标准不确定度,包括在 BIPM 和 SASO-NMCC 实现电压的不确定度,以及与比较相关的不确定度。要阅读本文正文,请点击最终报告。请注意,此文本为 BIPM 关键对比数据库 https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/ 附录 B 中的文本。根据 CIPM 互认安排 (CIPM MRA) 的规定,最终报告已经过同行评审,并获准由 CCEM 出版。
{"title":"Bilateral comparison of 1.018 V and 10 V standards between SASO-NMCC (Saudi Arabia) and the BIPM, September to November 2023 (part of the ongoing BIPM key comparison BIPM.EM-K11.a and b)","authors":"S Solve, R Chayramy, M Stock, A Alrobaish and A Aljomaie","doi":"10.1088/0026-1394/61/1a/01005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/61/1a/01005","url":null,"abstract":"As part of the ongoing BIPM key comparison BIPM.EM-K11.a and b, a comparison of the 1.018 V and 10 V voltage reference standards of the BIPM and the SASO-NMCC (Saudi Arabia), from September to November 2023. Two BIPM Zener diode-based travelling standards (Fluke 732B), BIPM_E (ZE) and BIPM_F (ZF), were transported by freight to the SASO-NMCC and back to the BIPM. In order to keep the Zeners powered during their transportation phase, a voltage stabiliser developed by the BIPM was connected in parallel to the internal battery. At the SASO-NMCC and the BIPM, the reference standard for DC voltage is a Programmable Josephson Voltage Standard (PJVS). The output electromotive force (EMF) of each travelling standard was measured by direct comparison with the primary standard. The final result of the comparison is presented as the difference between the values assigned to DC voltage standards by the SASO-NMCC, at the level of 1.018 V and 10 V, at the SASO-NMCC, USASO-NMCC, and those assigned by the BIPM, at the BIPM, UBIPM, at the reference date of the 30th of September 2023. USASO-NMCC - UBIPM = 0.06 V; uc = 0.05 V, at 1.018 V USASO-NMCC - UBIPM = 0.22 V; uc = 0.12 V, at 10 V where uc is the combined standard uncertainty associated with the measured difference, including the uncertainty of the realisation of the volt at the BIPM and at the SASO-NMCC, and the uncertainty related to the comparison. To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report. Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/. The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCEM, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (CIPM MRA).","PeriodicalId":18444,"journal":{"name":"Metrologia","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141171686","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Bilateral comparison of 1.018 V and 10 V standards between INRIM (Italy) and the BIPM, November to December 2023 (part of the ongoing BIPM key comparison BIPM.EM-K11.a and b) INRIM (意大利)和 BIPM 之间 1.018 V 和 10 V 标准的双边比较,2023 年 11 月至 12 月(BIPM.EM-K11.a 和 b 正在进行的关键比较的一部分)。
IF 2.4 3区 工程技术 Q2 INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION Pub Date : 2024-05-27 DOI: 10.1088/0026-1394/61/1a/01004
S Solve, R Chayramy, M Stock, P Durandetto and E Enrico
As part of the ongoing BIPM key comparison BIPM.EM-K11.a and b, a comparison of the 1.018 V and 10 V voltage reference standards of the BIPM and the INRIM (Italy), from November to December 2023. Two BIPM Zener diode-based travelling standards (Fluke 732B), BIPM_7 (Z7) and BIPM_9 (Z9), were transported by freight to the INRIM and back to the BIPM. In order to keep the Zeners powered during their transportation phase, two additional external batteries were connected in parallel to the internal battery. At the INRIM and the BIPM, the reference standard for DC voltage is a Programmable Josephson Voltage Standard (PJVS). The output electromotive force (EMF) of each travelling standard was measured by direct comparison with the primary standard. The final result of the comparison is presented as the difference between the values assigned to DC voltage standards by the INRIM, at the level of 1.018 V and 10 V, at the INRIM, UINRIM, and those assigned by the BIPM, at the BIPM, UBIPM, at the reference date of the 1st of December 2023. UINRIM - UBIPM = 0.06 V; uc = 0.05 V, at 1.018 V UINRIM - UBIPM = 0.22 V; uc = 0.12 V, at 10 V where uc is the combined standard uncertainty associated with the measured difference, including the uncertainty of the realisation of the volt at the BIPM and at the INRIM, and the uncertainty related to the comparison. To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report. Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/. The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCEM, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (CIPM MRA).
作为正在进行的 BIPM 关键比较 BIPM.EM-K11.a 和 b 的一部分,从 2023 年 11 月至 12 月,对 BIPM 和 INRIM(意大利)的 1.018 V 和 10 V 电压基准标准进行了比较。BIPM 的两个基于齐纳二极管的巡回标准(Fluke 732B),BIPM_7 (Z7) 和 BIPM_9 (Z9),通过货运运往 INRIM,再运回 BIPM。为了在运输过程中保持禅思机的电力供应,另外两个外部电池与内部电池并联。在 INRIM 和 BIPM,直流电压的参考标准是可编程约瑟夫森电压标准 (PJVS)。每个巡回标准的输出电动势(EMF)都是通过与主标准直接比较来测量的。比较的最终结果是,在 2023 年 12 月 1 日的基准日期,国际海事研究所(INRIM,UINRIM)为 1.018 V 和 10 V 等级的直流电压标准分配的数值与国际计量局(BIPM,UBIPM)为 1.018 V 和 10 V 等级的直流电压标准分配的数值之间的差值。UINRIM - UBIPM = 0.06 V; uc = 0.05 V, at 1.018 V UINRIM - UBIPM = 0.22 V; uc = 0.12 V, at 10 V 其中,uc 是与测量差值相关的综合标准不确定度,包括在 BIPM 和 INRIM 实现电压的不确定度,以及与比较相关的不确定度。要阅读本文正文,请点击最终报告。请注意,该文本是出现在国际计量局关键比较数据库 https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/ 附录 B 中的文本。根据 CIPM 互认安排 (CIPM MRA) 的规定,最终报告已经过同行评审,并获准由 CCEM 出版。
{"title":"Bilateral comparison of 1.018 V and 10 V standards between INRIM (Italy) and the BIPM, November to December 2023 (part of the ongoing BIPM key comparison BIPM.EM-K11.a and b)","authors":"S Solve, R Chayramy, M Stock, P Durandetto and E Enrico","doi":"10.1088/0026-1394/61/1a/01004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/61/1a/01004","url":null,"abstract":"As part of the ongoing BIPM key comparison BIPM.EM-K11.a and b, a comparison of the 1.018 V and 10 V voltage reference standards of the BIPM and the INRIM (Italy), from November to December 2023. Two BIPM Zener diode-based travelling standards (Fluke 732B), BIPM_7 (Z7) and BIPM_9 (Z9), were transported by freight to the INRIM and back to the BIPM. In order to keep the Zeners powered during their transportation phase, two additional external batteries were connected in parallel to the internal battery. At the INRIM and the BIPM, the reference standard for DC voltage is a Programmable Josephson Voltage Standard (PJVS). The output electromotive force (EMF) of each travelling standard was measured by direct comparison with the primary standard. The final result of the comparison is presented as the difference between the values assigned to DC voltage standards by the INRIM, at the level of 1.018 V and 10 V, at the INRIM, UINRIM, and those assigned by the BIPM, at the BIPM, UBIPM, at the reference date of the 1st of December 2023. UINRIM - UBIPM = 0.06 V; uc = 0.05 V, at 1.018 V UINRIM - UBIPM = 0.22 V; uc = 0.12 V, at 10 V where uc is the combined standard uncertainty associated with the measured difference, including the uncertainty of the realisation of the volt at the BIPM and at the INRIM, and the uncertainty related to the comparison. To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report. Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/. The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCEM, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (CIPM MRA).","PeriodicalId":18444,"journal":{"name":"Metrologia","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141171470","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The CCL-K11 ongoing key comparison. Final report for 2023 CCL-K11 进行中的关键比较。2023 年最终报告
IF 2.4 3区 工程技术 Q2 INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION Pub Date : 2024-05-12 DOI: 10.1088/0026-1394/61/1a/04002
M Matus, H S Margolis, J Seppä, H Karlsson, C-H Hanquist, A J Lancaster, A J Lewis, M Brawer, M del Mar Pérez, M Bisi, J Hald and G Zechner
Six lasers from six national metrological institutes (NMIs) were compared in the year 2023 as part of the CCL-K11 ongoing key comparison, initiated by the 13th meeting of the Comité Consultative des Longueurs (CCL) in 2007. The absolute frequency of theses lasers was measured in three different node laboratories following the technical protocol for CCL-K11. All are practical realisations of the definition of the metre according to the MeP for the definition of the metre. Five standards are He-Ne-lasers stabilized on the f component of the R(127) 11-5 transitions of molecular iodine 127I2 with a wavelength of approximately 633 nm. The sixth standard is a fibre laser stabilized to the P(16) (ν1+ν3) transition of molecular acetylene 13C2H2 with a wavelength of approximately 1542 nm. The technical protocol was deliberately designed to accommodate artefacts of different wavelengths in a common framework. The results of these measurements are compiled in the present report. The comparison reports, as communicated by each participant, are included in the main document. This document constitutes the thirteenth final report for the ongoing key comparison CCL-K11. To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report. Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/. The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCL, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (CIPM MRA).
由六个国家计量机构(NMIs)的六台激光器在 2023 年进行了比较,这是 CCL-K11 正在进行的关键比较的一部分。按照 CCL-K11 的技术协议,在三个不同的节点实验室测量了这些激光器的绝对频率。所有这些都是根据米的定义标准(MeP)对米的定义的实际应用。五个标准是稳定在波长约为 633 nm 的分子碘 127I2 的 R(127) 11-5 转变的 f 分量上的氦氖激光器。第六个标准是稳定在分子乙炔 13C2H2 的 P(16) (ν1+ν3) 转变上的光纤激光器,波长约为 1542 纳米。技术协议的设计是有意在一个共同的框架内容纳不同波长的伪影。本报告汇编了这些测量结果。各参与方提交的对比报告载于主文件。本文件是正在进行的关键比对 CCL-K11 的第 13 份最终报告。要阅读本文正文,请点击最终报告。请注意,本报告正文是 BIPM 关键比对数据库 https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/ 附录 B 中的内容。根据 CIPM 互认安排 (CIPM MRA) 的规定,最终报告已由 CCL 进行同行评审并批准出版。
{"title":"The CCL-K11 ongoing key comparison. Final report for 2023","authors":"M Matus, H S Margolis, J Seppä, H Karlsson, C-H Hanquist, A J Lancaster, A J Lewis, M Brawer, M del Mar Pérez, M Bisi, J Hald and G Zechner","doi":"10.1088/0026-1394/61/1a/04002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/61/1a/04002","url":null,"abstract":"Six lasers from six national metrological institutes (NMIs) were compared in the year 2023 as part of the CCL-K11 ongoing key comparison, initiated by the 13th meeting of the Comité Consultative des Longueurs (CCL) in 2007. The absolute frequency of theses lasers was measured in three different node laboratories following the technical protocol for CCL-K11. All are practical realisations of the definition of the metre according to the MeP for the definition of the metre. Five standards are He-Ne-lasers stabilized on the f component of the R(127) 11-5 transitions of molecular iodine 127I2 with a wavelength of approximately 633 nm. The sixth standard is a fibre laser stabilized to the P(16) (ν1+ν3) transition of molecular acetylene 13C2H2 with a wavelength of approximately 1542 nm. The technical protocol was deliberately designed to accommodate artefacts of different wavelengths in a common framework. The results of these measurements are compiled in the present report. The comparison reports, as communicated by each participant, are included in the main document. This document constitutes the thirteenth final report for the ongoing key comparison CCL-K11. To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report. Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/. The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCL, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (CIPM MRA).","PeriodicalId":18444,"journal":{"name":"Metrologia","volume":"116 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140937305","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Final report for CCT comparison of ITS-90 realisations above the silver point using two transfer radiation thermometers and a set of high temperature fixed-point blackbody cells 使用两个传递辐射温度计和一套高温定点黑体电池对银点以上的 ITS-90 实现情况进行 CCT 比较的最终报告
IF 2.4 3区 工程技术 Q2 INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION Pub Date : 2024-05-12 DOI: 10.1088/0026-1394/61/1a/03003
Helen McEvoy, Dave Lowe, Graham Machin, Maria José Martin, Klaus Anhalt, Jӧrg Hollandt, Mohamed Sadli, Frédéric Bourson, Yoshiro Yamada, Naohiko Sasajima, Xiaofeng Lu, Yongshim Yoo, Howard Yoon, Charles Gibson, Andrew Todd and Donald Woods
This report outlines the equipment, measurement method, results and uncertainties associated with the participant measurements for the Consultative Committee of Thermometry Key Comparison K10 (CCT-K10), "ITS-90 realisations above the silver point using two transfer radiation thermometers and a set of high temperature fixed-point blackbody cells", over the period from around summer 2014 to the final measurements made during January 2020. The report presents differences of the participant data from the KCRV values for both the radiation thermometer and HTFP measurements. Note: this interim report excludes the measurement data of VNIIM, Russia - see explanation at the end of Section 6. To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report. Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/. The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCT, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (CIPM MRA).
本报告概述了温度测量咨询委员会关键比对 K10(CCT-K10)"使用两台传递辐射温度计和一组高温定点黑体电池进行银点以上 ITS-90 实测 "的参与测量的设备、测量方法、结果和不确定性,测量时间从 2014 年夏季前后到 2020 年 1 月的最终测量。报告介绍了辐射温度计和高温定点黑体电池测量的参与方数据与 KCRV 值之间的差异。注:本临时报告不包括俄罗斯 VNIIM 的测量数据 - 参见第 6 节末尾的解释。要阅读本文正文,请点击最终报告。请注意,此文本为 BIPM 关键比对数据库 https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/ 附录 B 中的文本。根据 CIPM 互认协议(CIPM MRA)的规定,最终报告已经过同行评审,并获准由 CCT 出版。
{"title":"Final report for CCT comparison of ITS-90 realisations above the silver point using two transfer radiation thermometers and a set of high temperature fixed-point blackbody cells","authors":"Helen McEvoy, Dave Lowe, Graham Machin, Maria José Martin, Klaus Anhalt, Jӧrg Hollandt, Mohamed Sadli, Frédéric Bourson, Yoshiro Yamada, Naohiko Sasajima, Xiaofeng Lu, Yongshim Yoo, Howard Yoon, Charles Gibson, Andrew Todd and Donald Woods","doi":"10.1088/0026-1394/61/1a/03003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/61/1a/03003","url":null,"abstract":"This report outlines the equipment, measurement method, results and uncertainties associated with the participant measurements for the Consultative Committee of Thermometry Key Comparison K10 (CCT-K10), \"ITS-90 realisations above the silver point using two transfer radiation thermometers and a set of high temperature fixed-point blackbody cells\", over the period from around summer 2014 to the final measurements made during January 2020. The report presents differences of the participant data from the KCRV values for both the radiation thermometer and HTFP measurements. Note: this interim report excludes the measurement data of VNIIM, Russia - see explanation at the end of Section 6. To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report. Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/. The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCT, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (CIPM MRA).","PeriodicalId":18444,"journal":{"name":"Metrologia","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140937306","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Metrologia
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1