{"title":"Public activities of N.S. Derzhavin in the Macedonian question in 1912-1915","authors":"N. Gusev","doi":"10.7546/ds.2019.12.17","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7546/ds.2019.12.17","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":184671,"journal":{"name":"Drinovsky sbornik","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114942358","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The article analyzes the ways and consequences of the affect the globalization processes have, on the modern Ukrainian language; innovations of the late nineteenth century vocabulary, that influenced changes of lingual mind, his or her mentality and the formation of modern language personality, which are emerging in society and developing on the ground of self-performance and secured social relationships and interactions ability, and which is a condition and a product of culture, has been thought. All peculiarities of that society, in which they are (i.e. economic and social structure, peculiarities of daily life, social system of intelligent qualities and character features, that are appraised by society and gained in the process of education and upbringing) reflect in the specifics of individuals’ thinking.In the lingual practice of each new generation some specific language peculiarities appear and they are different from the speaking of its predecessors. Due to this the important tendency of the development of national vocabulary begin to be the fashion of separate lexical units, which influence the emergence of the modern lingual personality.Fashionable words are the specific layer of lexis which have words of foreign origin, stylistically confined ones which differ with strange sounds and semantics, high constancy of using them, i.e. which are in the focus of spearheaded lingual attention of modern human.The work given characterizes the concept of “globalism” as a result of adaptation of lingual elements at the phonetical, grammatical and graphical levels. The abilities of the globalization process on how to enrich language, since the flaw of information transmitted has enlarged and qualitatively enriched itself, the information, and on how to shake the language norm, destabilize lingual life, have been analyzed.The conclusions have been made about that is necessarily to define the strategy of the further development of the Ukrainian lexical found in the modern informative environment, necessarily to control the stage of entering of the Ukrainian nation into the globalized world, and that language processes of the modern period should be kept under control by specialists.
{"title":"Formation of the language personality in the era of globalization","authors":"V. Sukhenko","doi":"10.7546/ds.2019.12.29","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7546/ds.2019.12.29","url":null,"abstract":"The article analyzes the ways and consequences of the affect the globalization processes have, on the modern Ukrainian language; innovations of the late nineteenth century vocabulary, that influenced changes of lingual mind, his or her mentality and the formation of modern language personality, which are emerging in society and developing on the ground of self-performance and secured social relationships and interactions ability, and which is a condition and a product of culture, has been thought. All peculiarities of that society, in which they are (i.e. economic and social structure, peculiarities of daily life, social system of intelligent qualities and character features, that are appraised by society and gained in the process of education and upbringing) reflect in the specifics of individuals’ thinking.In the lingual practice of each new generation some specific language peculiarities appear and they are different from the speaking of its predecessors. Due to this the important tendency of the development of national vocabulary begin to be the fashion of separate lexical units, which influence the emergence of the modern lingual personality.Fashionable words are the specific layer of lexis which have words of foreign origin, stylistically confined ones which differ with strange sounds and semantics, high constancy of using them, i.e. which are in the focus of spearheaded lingual attention of modern human.The work given characterizes the concept of “globalism” as a result of adaptation of lingual elements at the phonetical, grammatical and graphical levels. The abilities of the globalization process on how to enrich language, since the flaw of information transmitted has enlarged and qualitatively enriched itself, the information, and on how to shake the language norm, destabilize lingual life, have been analyzed.The conclusions have been made about that is necessarily to define the strategy of the further development of the Ukrainian lexical found in the modern informative environment, necessarily to control the stage of entering of the Ukrainian nation into the globalized world, and that language processes of the modern period should be kept under control by specialists.","PeriodicalId":184671,"journal":{"name":"Drinovsky sbornik","volume":"420 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133077102","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Статья рассматривает деятельность бессарабского болгарина Стефана Баламеза в условиях различных политических режимов (царского, румынского, советского), установившихся в Бессарабии в период 1918–1940 гг. Стефан Баламез входил в состав Сфатул Цэрий («Совет страны»). При голосовании по вопросу о присоединении Бессарабии к Королевской Румынии (27 марта 1918 г.) являлся одним из трех депутатов, кто открыто проголосовал против. После того, как в провинции была установлена румынская власть, Баламез остается в Бессарабии. Он стал председателем Совете Камеры труда Кишинева. После присоединении Бессарабии к СССР, 13 июня 1941 г. Стефан Баламез был арестован органами НКВД и осужден на 10 лет по статье «участие в контрреволюционной партии». Ключевые слова: Совет страны, Стефан Баламез, Бессарабия, Королевская Румыния, болгары, межвоенный период, репрессии, присоединение.
{"title":"Stefan Balamez – a Bulgarian who voted against the accession of Bessarabia to Romania","authors":"I. Duminica","doi":"10.7546/ds.2019.12.06","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7546/ds.2019.12.06","url":null,"abstract":"Статья рассматривает деятельность бессарабского болгарина Стефана Баламеза в условиях различных политических режимов (царского, румынского, советского), установившихся в Бессарабии в период 1918–1940 гг. Стефан Баламез входил в состав Сфатул Цэрий («Совет страны»). При голосовании по вопросу о присоединении Бессарабии к Королевской Румынии (27 марта 1918 г.) являлся одним из трех депутатов, кто открыто проголосовал против. После того, как в провинции была установлена румынская власть, Баламез остается в Бессарабии. Он стал председателем Совете Камеры труда Кишинева. После присоединении Бессарабии к СССР, 13 июня 1941 г. Стефан Баламез был арестован органами НКВД и осужден на 10 лет по статье «участие в контрреволюционной партии». Ключевые слова: Совет страны, Стефан Баламез, Бессарабия, Королевская Румыния, болгары, межвоенный период, репрессии, присоединение.","PeriodicalId":184671,"journal":{"name":"Drinovsky sbornik","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123965155","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This article brings in discussion the remarkable contribution of the Bessarabian Bulgarians, natives from Moldova and Ukraine, to the formation of the musical patrimony of Moldova and to its promotion all over the world. There is a special emphasis on the creation of such personalities from the domain as Ana Belicevicina, Ion Bas, Strezev dinasty, Petru Stoianov and others. It is mentioned that the Bessarabian Bulgarians manifested not just as famous interpreters of popular and classical music, but as theoreticians of music and pedagogues as well.Bulgarians endured the rich traditions of the musical creativity of their people. The first settlers brought with them from their native lands also the enormous song-musical wealth of the Bulgarian people, which, like a baton, passed on to subsequent generations. In every village, everyone who had a voice sang – both old and young. For every kind of work, for every rite there was a corresponding song. Among the Bulgarians were people who knew dozens and even hundreds of songs. The richness of the repertoire and mastery in the second half of the 19 – early 20th centuries such national singers and singers as Elena Yankova (1825-1901) and her daughter Kina Yaneva (Bolgrad), Stepanida Varbanskaya (Priazovye), Sava Peltek (Vaisal), Anton Kara and Ivan Arabadzhi (Taraklia ), Vasily Turlak (Korten). There is a lot of information about this.
本文讨论了来自摩尔多瓦和乌克兰的比萨拉比亚保加利亚人对摩尔多瓦音乐遗产的形成及其在世界范围内的推广所做出的卓越贡献。书中特别强调了来自Ana Belicevicina, Ion Bas, Strezev dinasty, Petru Stoianov等人的创作。书中提到，比萨拉比亚的保加利亚人不仅是著名的流行音乐和古典音乐的诠释者，也是音乐的理论家和教育家。保加利亚人忍受着他们人民丰富的音乐创造力传统。第一批移民也从他们的祖国带来了保加利亚人民巨大的音乐财富，这些财富像接力棒一样传给了后代。在每个村子里，凡是能说话的人都唱歌——无论老少。每一种工作，每一种仪式都有相应的歌曲。保加利亚人中有些人知道几十首甚至几百首歌。在19世纪下半叶至20世纪初，如Elena Yankova(1825-1901)和她的女儿Kina Yaneva (Bolgrad)， Stepanida Varbanskaya (Priazovye)， Sava Peltek (Vaisal)， Anton Kara和Ivan Arabadzhi (Taraklia)， Vasily Turlak (Korten)等国家歌手和歌手的曲目丰富和精通。关于这个有很多信息。
{"title":"Bulgarians – musical figures of the Republic of Moldova","authors":"N. Chervenkov","doi":"10.7546/ds.2019.12.11","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7546/ds.2019.12.11","url":null,"abstract":"This article brings in discussion the remarkable contribution of the Bessarabian Bulgarians, natives from Moldova and Ukraine, to the formation of the musical patrimony of Moldova and to its promotion all over the world. There is a special emphasis on the creation of such personalities from the domain as Ana Belicevicina, Ion Bas, Strezev dinasty, Petru Stoianov and others. It is mentioned that the Bessarabian Bulgarians manifested not just as famous interpreters of popular and classical music, but as theoreticians of music and pedagogues as well.Bulgarians endured the rich traditions of the musical creativity of their people. The first settlers brought with them from their native lands also the enormous song-musical wealth of the Bulgarian people, which, like a baton, passed on to subsequent generations. In every village, everyone who had a voice sang – both old and young. For every kind of work, for every rite there was a corresponding song. Among the Bulgarians were people who knew dozens and even hundreds of songs. The richness of the repertoire and mastery in the second half of the 19 – early 20th centuries such national singers and singers as Elena Yankova (1825-1901) and her daughter Kina Yaneva (Bolgrad), Stepanida Varbanskaya (Priazovye), Sava Peltek (Vaisal), Anton Kara and Ivan Arabadzhi (Taraklia ), Vasily Turlak (Korten). There is a lot of information about this.","PeriodicalId":184671,"journal":{"name":"Drinovsky sbornik","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116379621","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
a clear focus on the Bulgarian origin, presented in the article of D. Chakir, to a certain extent is a reflection of the official point of view on the origin of the Gagauz, specific to the Russian administration. In addition, he served his entire life in Bulgarian parishes; communicated with parishioners and delivered sermons in Bulgarian language. He perceived this environment as akin and experienced the powerful impact of Bulgarian identity. The author draws attention to the next important factor. Exactly at the turn of the 19 th -20 th centuries the processes of transformation in the area of self-awareness of the Gagauz people were rapidly proceeding. And Dimitri Chakir had a chance to live and write his essays when the processes in the field of Gagauz identity were not yet transformed from quantity to quality. However, with his work on the ancestry Chakirov also contributed to the strengthening of the Gagauz identity, including M. Chakir himself.
D. Chakir文章中对保加利亚起源的明确关注，在一定程度上反映了俄罗斯政府对Gagauz起源的官方观点。此外，他一生都在保加利亚的教区服务;用保加利亚语与教区居民交流和布道。他认为这种环境是相似的，并经历了保加利亚身份的强大影响。作者提请注意下一个重要因素。正是在19 -20世纪之交，加高兹人自我意识领域的转变过程正在迅速进行。Dimitri Chakir有机会在Gagauz身份领域的过程还没有从数量转变到质量的时候生活和写作他的论文。然而，通过对祖先的研究，查基洛夫也为加强加高兹人的身份做出了贡献，包括查基尔本人。
{"title":"Dimitriy Chakir, Iserliya village priest: life, work and identification specifics","authors":"Elizaveta Cvilincova","doi":"10.7546/ds.2019.12.08","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7546/ds.2019.12.08","url":null,"abstract":"a clear focus on the Bulgarian origin, presented in the article of D. Chakir, to a certain extent is a reflection of the official point of view on the origin of the Gagauz, specific to the Russian administration. In addition, he served his entire life in Bulgarian parishes; communicated with parishioners and delivered sermons in Bulgarian language. He perceived this environment as akin and experienced the powerful impact of Bulgarian identity. The author draws attention to the next important factor. Exactly at the turn of the 19 th -20 th centuries the processes of transformation in the area of self-awareness of the Gagauz people were rapidly proceeding. And Dimitri Chakir had a chance to live and write his essays when the processes in the field of Gagauz identity were not yet transformed from quantity to quality. However, with his work on the ancestry Chakirov also contributed to the strengthening of the Gagauz identity, including M. Chakir himself.","PeriodicalId":184671,"journal":{"name":"Drinovsky sbornik","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116860111","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"In memory of the prominent Macedonian historiance of art","authors":"O. Mykytenko","doi":"10.7546/ds.2019.12.35","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7546/ds.2019.12.35","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":184671,"journal":{"name":"Drinovsky sbornik","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121780012","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Conference “Knowledge sharing in academic cultures through migration within and between Europe and the Black Sea region (before the First World War and its aftermath)” (Skopje, January 11-12, 2019)","authors":"O. Mykytenko","doi":"10.7546/ds.2019.12.33","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7546/ds.2019.12.33","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":184671,"journal":{"name":"Drinovsky sbornik","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122276115","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Большевики, осуществившие государственный переворот в России в 1917 году, пытались распространить советскую власть в Европе при помощи «экспорта революции», точнее скрытой агрессии. Конечной целью такой политики было создание “Мировой социалистической республики”. Национальные государства Центральной и Восточной Европы, сопротивляясь распространению большевизма, были втянуты в войны с советской Россией, которые она пыталась маскировать как “внутренние гражданские”. Румыния в этом смысле оказалась исключением из общей тенденции, поскольку была единственной страной региона, официально находившейся в состоянии войны с советской Россией. Антибольшевистские войны в Центральной и Восточной Европе завершились созданием так называемой Тартуско-Рижской системы и Санитарного кордона, где Бухаресту отводилась ключевая роль защиты Балкан от большевистской экспансии. Румыния, выдержав войну на два фронта, завершила процесс своего национального объединения, стала региональным центром силы, но при этом оставалась единственной страной Санитарного кордона, с которой советская Россия не подписала мирное соглашение. Ключевые слова: большевизм, антибольшевистские войны в Центральной и Восточной Европе в 1918−1920 годах, Cанитарний кордон, Российская советская республика, Королевство Румыния, Бессарабия.
{"title":"The Resistance of Romania to the Russian Bolshevik Aggression, 1918-1920","authors":"D. Bondarenko","doi":"10.7546/ds.2019.12.20","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7546/ds.2019.12.20","url":null,"abstract":"Большевики, осуществившие государственный переворот в России в 1917 году, пытались распространить советскую власть в Европе при помощи «экспорта революции», точнее скрытой агрессии. Конечной целью такой политики было создание “Мировой социалистической республики”. Национальные государства Центральной и Восточной Европы, сопротивляясь распространению большевизма, были втянуты в войны с советской Россией, которые она пыталась маскировать как “внутренние гражданские”. Румыния в этом смысле оказалась исключением из общей тенденции, поскольку была единственной страной региона, официально находившейся в состоянии войны с советской Россией. Антибольшевистские войны в Центральной и Восточной Европе завершились созданием так называемой Тартуско-Рижской системы и Санитарного кордона, где Бухаресту отводилась ключевая роль защиты Балкан от большевистской экспансии. Румыния, выдержав войну на два фронта, завершила процесс своего национального объединения, стала региональным центром силы, но при этом оставалась единственной страной Санитарного кордона, с которой советская Россия не подписала мирное соглашение. Ключевые слова: большевизм, антибольшевистские войны в Центральной и Восточной Европе в 1918−1920 годах, Cанитарний кордон, Российская советская республика, Королевство Румыния, Бессарабия.","PeriodicalId":184671,"journal":{"name":"Drinovsky sbornik","volume":"72 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"120983113","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Role of Communicative Practices by V. B. Antonovich in the Formation of Own Scientific School (the end of the 70s - 80s of the 19th century)","authors":"Olena Bohdashyna, Tetiana Kytychenko","doi":"10.7546/ds.2019.12.26","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7546/ds.2019.12.26","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":184671,"journal":{"name":"Drinovsky sbornik","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129525076","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The Paris Peace Conference was convoked to end the World War I and to construct the new post-war Versailles order in Europe that was being shaped in the years 1918-1923. The Great Powers’ leaders who gathered in Paris as well as the delegates of the smaller states who were doing their best to win the support of the former both were playing the political game motivated with the interests of their respective countries. Those interests sometimes crumpled into surprisingly complicated nodes. A number of them concerned the Central-Eastern European issues. That was the region where the scale of complexity was the largest one.
{"title":"The Great Powers’ Policy towards the Central-Eastern Europe in the Time of the Paris Peace Conference (1919) – the Nature of the Game and the Motives of the Players","authors":"Przemyslaw Zurawski vel Grajewski","doi":"10.7546/ds.2019.12.25","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7546/ds.2019.12.25","url":null,"abstract":"The Paris Peace Conference was convoked to end the World War I and to construct the new post-war Versailles order in Europe that was being shaped in the years 1918-1923. The Great Powers’ leaders who gathered in Paris as well as the delegates of the smaller states who were doing their best to win the support of the former both were playing the political game motivated with the interests of their respective countries. Those interests sometimes crumpled into surprisingly complicated nodes. A number of them concerned the Central-Eastern European issues. That was the region where the scale of complexity was the largest one.","PeriodicalId":184671,"journal":{"name":"Drinovsky sbornik","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129778828","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：