Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.37386/2305-4077-2022-1-74-88
V. S. Zaitsev
The article is devoted to the discussions of two books by V. V. Ermilov (“Chekhov” and “Dramaturgy of Anton Chekhov”). The discussions were held at the publishing house “Molodaya Gvardiya” and at the meeting of the commission on the theory of literature and criticism of the USSR Writers’ Union in 1946 and 1948. A. B. Derman spoke at both meetings with consistent criticism of V. V. Ermilov’s works. Shorthand records of A. B. Derman, V. B. Shklovsky, L. M. Myshkovskaya and others allow us to consider the specific features of Chekhov scholars disputes of the 1940s and to assess their influence on the subsequent development of Soviet Chekhovian studies.
这篇文章专门讨论了v·v·叶尔米洛夫的两本书(《契诃夫》和《安东·契诃夫的戏剧学》)。讨论是在Molodaya Gvardiya出版社和1946年和1948年苏联作家联盟文学理论和批评委员会的会议上举行的。a·b·德曼(A. B. Derman)在两次会议上都对v·v·叶尔米洛夫的作品提出了一贯的批评。A. B. Derman、V. B. Shklovsky、L. M. Myshkovskaya等人的速记记录使我们能够考虑20世纪40年代契诃夫学者争论的具体特征，并评估它们对苏联契诃夫研究的后续发展的影响。
{"title":"A. B. DERMAN AGAINST V. V. ERMILOV: FROM THE HISTORY OF SOVIET CHEKHOVIAN STUDIES OF THE 1940S","authors":"V. S. Zaitsev","doi":"10.37386/2305-4077-2022-1-74-88","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.37386/2305-4077-2022-1-74-88","url":null,"abstract":"The article is devoted to the discussions of two books by V. V. Ermilov (“Chekhov” and “Dramaturgy of Anton Chekhov”). The discussions were held at the publishing house “Molodaya Gvardiya” and at the meeting of the commission on the theory of literature and criticism of the USSR Writers’ Union in 1946 and 1948. A. B. Derman spoke at both meetings with consistent criticism of V. V. Ermilov’s works. Shorthand records of A. B. Derman, V. B. Shklovsky, L. M. Myshkovskaya and others allow us to consider the specific features of Chekhov scholars disputes of the 1940s and to assess their influence on the subsequent development of Soviet Chekhovian studies.","PeriodicalId":187515,"journal":{"name":"Culture and Text","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128076804","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.37386/2305-4077-2021-3-239-245
R. R. Akhunova
The article deals with the analysis of biblical female characters in Anna Akhmatov’s works and examines the features of their artistic interpretation in the cycle of Biblical Poems. The focus of the study is the Old Testament images of Lot’s wife, Rachel, Michola, which are significant for Akhmatov’s creativity. Their special aspects are conditioned by historical and autobiographical context of the poetess’s work. Having got through the civil war and revolution like many poets of the Silver Age, she correlated them, firstly, with the events described in the human eternal book, secondly, she passed them through the prism of her own experiences, which allows us to talk about the gender dimension of her reception of biblical female characters. This is evidenced by the architectonics of the cycle and the author’s re-emphasis in the transmission of biblical plots and characters that essentially disputes the biblical interpretation.
{"title":"FEATURES OF INTERPRETATION OF BIBLICAL FEMALE IMAGES IN LYRICS BY ANNA AKHMATOVA","authors":"R. R. Akhunova","doi":"10.37386/2305-4077-2021-3-239-245","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.37386/2305-4077-2021-3-239-245","url":null,"abstract":"The article deals with the analysis of biblical female characters in Anna Akhmatov’s works and examines the features of their artistic interpretation in the cycle of Biblical Poems. The focus of the study is the Old Testament images of Lot’s wife, Rachel, Michola, which are significant for Akhmatov’s creativity. Their special aspects are conditioned by historical and autobiographical context of the poetess’s work. Having got through the civil war and revolution like many poets of the Silver Age, she correlated them, firstly, with the events described in the human eternal book, secondly, she passed them through the prism of her own experiences, which allows us to talk about the gender dimension of her reception of biblical female characters. This is evidenced by the architectonics of the cycle and the author’s re-emphasis in the transmission of biblical plots and characters that essentially disputes the biblical interpretation.","PeriodicalId":187515,"journal":{"name":"Culture and Text","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131706877","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.37386/2305-4077-2022-3-226-238
V. Voropaev
The article dedicated to the 70th anniversary of the famous Russian literary critic Vladimir Dmitrievich Denisov describes his pedagogical and scientific activities, primarily aimed at studying the creative heritage of N. V. Gogol. It is emphasized that the hero of the day, never cheated on Gogol, remained faithful to his vocation. He has prepared, published and commented on many works and writings of the writer, including “Arabesques” and “Mirgorod” in the series “Literary Monuments” (a bibliography of his works on Gogol is given in the appendix). The merits of V. D. Denisov in the national Gogol studies are recognized by the scientific community, currently he is a member of the Gogol Commission of the Scientific Council “History of World Culture” of the Russian Academy of Sciences.
{"title":"LOYALTY TO THE VOCATION. TO THE 70TH ANNIVERSARY OF V. D. DENISOV","authors":"V. Voropaev","doi":"10.37386/2305-4077-2022-3-226-238","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.37386/2305-4077-2022-3-226-238","url":null,"abstract":"The article dedicated to the 70th anniversary of the famous Russian literary critic Vladimir Dmitrievich Denisov describes his pedagogical and scientific activities, primarily aimed at studying the creative heritage of N. V. Gogol. It is emphasized that the hero of the day, never cheated on Gogol, remained faithful to his vocation. He has prepared, published and commented on many works and writings of the writer, including “Arabesques” and “Mirgorod” in the series “Literary Monuments” (a bibliography of his works on Gogol is given in the appendix). The merits of V. D. Denisov in the national Gogol studies are recognized by the scientific community, currently he is a member of the Gogol Commission of the Scientific Council “History of World Culture” of the Russian Academy of Sciences.","PeriodicalId":187515,"journal":{"name":"Culture and Text","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122385016","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.37386/2305-4077-2021-2-152-163
D. Krotova
The article considers the main directions of artistic research of the central problem of E. Grishkovetz’s novel «Asphalt» - genuine self-realization, contradictions between the external canvas of the life of a «successful person» and the absence of a true meaningful filling of it, corresponding to the deep internal needs of the individual. Three important aspects of comprehension the declared problem have been identified - dramatic, tragic and comic. The type of a «hero of our time» presented in the novel «Asphalt» is analyzed in relation to the traditions of the prose of writers - «forty-year-olds» and the «ambivalent» hero characteristic of their work.
{"title":"NOVEL “ASPHALT” BY E. GRISHKOVETZ: THE PROBLEM OF SELF-REALIZATION OF THE PERSONALITY","authors":"D. Krotova","doi":"10.37386/2305-4077-2021-2-152-163","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.37386/2305-4077-2021-2-152-163","url":null,"abstract":"The article considers the main directions of artistic research of the central problem of E. Grishkovetz’s novel «Asphalt» - genuine self-realization, contradictions between the external canvas of the life of a «successful person» and the absence of a true meaningful filling of it, corresponding to the deep internal needs of the individual. Three important aspects of comprehension the declared problem have been identified - dramatic, tragic and comic. The type of a «hero of our time» presented in the novel «Asphalt» is analyzed in relation to the traditions of the prose of writers - «forty-year-olds» and the «ambivalent» hero characteristic of their work.","PeriodicalId":187515,"journal":{"name":"Culture and Text","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124217045","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.37386/2305-4077-2023-1-51-62
S. Kibalnik
The article puts forward the concept of “literary duel”. What is at issue is an exchange of personal attacks - usually partly open, partly hidden - on the part of two writers, in which a kind of “exchange of shots” takes place. Sometimes after that the exchange of shots continues. As an example, the article describes a kind of “literary duel”, which, to a certain extent, is based on a hidden intertextual polemic between Gazdanov and Nabokov. In particular, in the character of Vladimir Volf in Gazdanov’s novel “The Ghost of Alexander Volf”, there are features of Nabokov, and a parody of Gazdanov can be found in one of the minor characters of Nabokov’s sensational novel “Lolita”.
{"title":"ON THE CONCEPT OF “THE LITERARY DUEL” (“duel” between G. Gazdanov and V. Nabokov)","authors":"S. Kibalnik","doi":"10.37386/2305-4077-2023-1-51-62","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.37386/2305-4077-2023-1-51-62","url":null,"abstract":"The article puts forward the concept of “literary duel”. What is at issue is an exchange of personal attacks - usually partly open, partly hidden - on the part of two writers, in which a kind of “exchange of shots” takes place. Sometimes after that the exchange of shots continues. As an example, the article describes a kind of “literary duel”, which, to a certain extent, is based on a hidden intertextual polemic between Gazdanov and Nabokov. In particular, in the character of Vladimir Volf in Gazdanov’s novel “The Ghost of Alexander Volf”, there are features of Nabokov, and a parody of Gazdanov can be found in one of the minor characters of Nabokov’s sensational novel “Lolita”.","PeriodicalId":187515,"journal":{"name":"Culture and Text","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"117038650","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.37386/2305-4077-2023-1-123-145
M. Stroganov
Contemporaries considered the main representatives of aesthetic criticism: V. P. Botkin, P. V. Annenkov and A. V. Druzhinin like-minded people. But they rarely referred to each other and did not assert their methodological unity. Druzhinin was a professional writer and wrote constantly, and Annenkov and Botkin were amateurs: living in literature, arts, they wrote occasionally. Therefore, Druzhinin’s aesthetic legacy looks confused and archaic, while Annenkov and Botkin’s aesthetic legacy looks solid and promising. However, Druzhinin’s aesthetic throwing is fraught with future discoveries, which gives them special weight and significance. Annenkov saw the “mirror” of society in literature and often wrote about social types, although his assessments were diametrically opposed to the democratic camp. Druzhinin has very few social type analyses, and Botkin has none.In the interpretation of the role of criticism in the literary process, the “priceless triumvirate” was more unanimous. All of them used the generally accepted terminology (“the purpose of poetry is poetry”, art is a school of feelings, pleasant and useful, “defeated difficulty”) and considered art the only means of moral education of a person, recognizing the educational value not in abstract thought, but in the beauty, “grace” of a work of art. Annenkov, Botkin and Druzhinin continue Pushkin’s interpretation of the “purpose of art” as “an ideal, not a moral teaching.” But their concepts foreshadow either the theory of L. Tolstoy’s infection, or the theory of art as the embodiment of Fet’s beauty. But Annenkov and Botkin believe that in the process of creativity and perception of a literary text, the reader only repeats the actions of the author and does not commit actions not programmed by the authors. Druzhinin recognizes the great independence of the reader.
{"title":"READERS’ CONCERNS OF AESTHETIC CRITICISM","authors":"M. Stroganov","doi":"10.37386/2305-4077-2023-1-123-145","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.37386/2305-4077-2023-1-123-145","url":null,"abstract":"Contemporaries considered the main representatives of aesthetic criticism: V. P. Botkin, P. V. Annenkov and A. V. Druzhinin like-minded people. But they rarely referred to each other and did not assert their methodological unity. Druzhinin was a professional writer and wrote constantly, and Annenkov and Botkin were amateurs: living in literature, arts, they wrote occasionally. Therefore, Druzhinin’s aesthetic legacy looks confused and archaic, while Annenkov and Botkin’s aesthetic legacy looks solid and promising. However, Druzhinin’s aesthetic throwing is fraught with future discoveries, which gives them special weight and significance. Annenkov saw the “mirror” of society in literature and often wrote about social types, although his assessments were diametrically opposed to the democratic camp. Druzhinin has very few social type analyses, and Botkin has none.In the interpretation of the role of criticism in the literary process, the “priceless triumvirate” was more unanimous. All of them used the generally accepted terminology (“the purpose of poetry is poetry”, art is a school of feelings, pleasant and useful, “defeated difficulty”) and considered art the only means of moral education of a person, recognizing the educational value not in abstract thought, but in the beauty, “grace” of a work of art. Annenkov, Botkin and Druzhinin continue Pushkin’s interpretation of the “purpose of art” as “an ideal, not a moral teaching.” But their concepts foreshadow either the theory of L. Tolstoy’s infection, or the theory of art as the embodiment of Fet’s beauty. But Annenkov and Botkin believe that in the process of creativity and perception of a literary text, the reader only repeats the actions of the author and does not commit actions not programmed by the authors. Druzhinin recognizes the great independence of the reader.","PeriodicalId":187515,"journal":{"name":"Culture and Text","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115394420","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.37386/2305-4077-2022-4-140-149
T. A. Neverova
The article is devoted to the study of the artistic space in the text of the first book of V.P. Astafyev’s novel “Cursed and Killed”. The paper identifies the key spaces of the literary text, their specific features and relationship. The correlation of real and artistic space, the role of the latter in the expression of the author’s ideas is considered. The material for the study was the text of the first book “The Devil’s Pit” of the novel “The Cursed and Killed”, which was studied by methods of structural-semiotic, contextual and intertextual analysis.
{"title":"The specifics of the organization of art space in the book “The Devil’s Pit” by V.P. Astafyev’s novel “THE Cursed and Killed”","authors":"T. A. Neverova","doi":"10.37386/2305-4077-2022-4-140-149","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.37386/2305-4077-2022-4-140-149","url":null,"abstract":"The article is devoted to the study of the artistic space in the text of the first book of V.P. Astafyev’s novel “Cursed and Killed”. The paper identifies the key spaces of the literary text, their specific features and relationship. The correlation of real and artistic space, the role of the latter in the expression of the author’s ideas is considered. The material for the study was the text of the first book “The Devil’s Pit” of the novel “The Cursed and Killed”, which was studied by methods of structural-semiotic, contextual and intertextual analysis.","PeriodicalId":187515,"journal":{"name":"Culture and Text","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115508883","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.37386/2305-4077-2022-4-55-69
S. Titarenko
The article is dedicated to the research of gothic tradition transformation in symbolist novels of Fyodor Sologub, Valery Bryusov, Andrei Bely, Aleksey Remizov, Aleksey Skaldin and others. Archetipical and symbolic images and motifs of abyss, chaos, labyrinth and circle are analyzed. They define the change of the functions of gothic horror. The study looks at the problem of representation of ritual-mythological “rite de passage”, images of “dance macabre”, visual and sound symbols that represent existential and metaphysic fear.
{"title":"ARCHETYPES OF FEAR AND THE PROBLEM OF TRANSFORMATION OF THE GOTHIC HORROR IN A SYMBOLIST NOVEL","authors":"S. Titarenko","doi":"10.37386/2305-4077-2022-4-55-69","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.37386/2305-4077-2022-4-55-69","url":null,"abstract":"The article is dedicated to the research of gothic tradition transformation in symbolist novels of Fyodor Sologub, Valery Bryusov, Andrei Bely, Aleksey Remizov, Aleksey Skaldin and others. Archetipical and symbolic images and motifs of abyss, chaos, labyrinth and circle are analyzed. They define the change of the functions of gothic horror. The study looks at the problem of representation of ritual-mythological “rite de passage”, images of “dance macabre”, visual and sound symbols that represent existential and metaphysic fear.","PeriodicalId":187515,"journal":{"name":"Culture and Text","volume":"78 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114083388","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.37386/2305-4077-2021-3-246-259
M. V. Chistyakova
The article is devoted to the consideration of various types of citation used by Ivan Vyrypaev in early drama in the period from 1999 to 2006. The author attempts to identify and analyze the evolution of not only the reception, but also the ideological and content nature of drama. The plays “The City where I Am”, “Valentine’s Day”, “Oxygen”, “Genesis No. 2”, “July” served as the material for the study.
{"title":"INTERTEXTUALITY AS A TECHNIQUE IN THE EARLY DRAMA OF IVAN VYRYPAEV: TYPES OF CITATIONS","authors":"M. V. Chistyakova","doi":"10.37386/2305-4077-2021-3-246-259","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.37386/2305-4077-2021-3-246-259","url":null,"abstract":"The article is devoted to the consideration of various types of citation used by Ivan Vyrypaev in early drama in the period from 1999 to 2006. The author attempts to identify and analyze the evolution of not only the reception, but also the ideological and content nature of drama. The plays “The City where I Am”, “Valentine’s Day”, “Oxygen”, “Genesis No. 2”, “July” served as the material for the study.","PeriodicalId":187515,"journal":{"name":"Culture and Text","volume":"2015 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127321448","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.37386/2305-4077-2022-3-86-93
V. Denisov
The article is devoted to the relations between N. Ya. Prokopovich (1810 1857) and his great namesake, when they started their adult life, in particular stories with the idyll “Hanz Küchelgarten” (1829). Only after Gogol’s death, Prokopovich announced to P. Kulish, the writer’s biographer, that he accidentally found out about the authorship of that “poem” and the annihilation of its entire circulation. However, our research suggests that it was conceived by two Nikolays, although its text was mainly written by N. Prokopovich. N. Gogol-Yanovsky took an active part in its creation, and then, believing in its success, became its publisher. After the failure, he, feeling guilty before a friend, entrusted him to edit the first edition of the comedy The Inspector General and his first Collected Works.
{"title":"NIKOLAI PROKOPOVICH AND NIKOLAI GOGOL","authors":"V. Denisov","doi":"10.37386/2305-4077-2022-3-86-93","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.37386/2305-4077-2022-3-86-93","url":null,"abstract":"The article is devoted to the relations between N. Ya. Prokopovich (1810 1857) and his great namesake, when they started their adult life, in particular stories with the idyll “Hanz Küchelgarten” (1829). Only after Gogol’s death, Prokopovich announced to P. Kulish, the writer’s biographer, that he accidentally found out about the authorship of that “poem” and the annihilation of its entire circulation. However, our research suggests that it was conceived by two Nikolays, although its text was mainly written by N. Prokopovich. N. Gogol-Yanovsky took an active part in its creation, and then, believing in its success, became its publisher. After the failure, he, feeling guilty before a friend, entrusted him to edit the first edition of the comedy The Inspector General and his first Collected Works.","PeriodicalId":187515,"journal":{"name":"Culture and Text","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125311075","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：