Nature Reviews Immunology最新文献

The peripheral immune system communicates with the brain through complex anatomical routes involving the skull, the brain borders, circumventricular organs and peripheral nerves. These immune–brain communication pathways were classically considered to be dormant under physiological conditions and active only in cases of infection or damage. Yet, peripheral immune cells and signals are key in brain development, function and maintenance. In this Perspective, we propose an alternative framework for understanding the mechanisms of immune–brain communication. During brain development and in homeostasis, these anatomical structures allow selected elements of the peripheral immune system to affect the brain directly or indirectly, within physiological limits. By contrast, in ageing and pathological settings, detrimental peripheral immune signals hijack the existing communication routes or alter their structure. We discuss why a diversity of communication channels is needed and how they work in relation to one another to maintain homeostasis of the brain.

A decade after the term ‘trained immunity’ (TRIM) was coined to reflect the long-lasting hyper-responsiveness of innate immune cells with an epigenetically imprinted ‘memory’ of earlier stimuli, our understanding has broadened to include the potential implications of TRIM in health and disease. Here, after summarizing the well-documented beneficial effects of TRIM against infections, we discuss emerging evidence that TRIM is also a major underlying mechanism in chronic inflammation-related disorders such as periodontitis, rheumatoid arthritis and cardiovascular disease. Furthermore, mounting evidence indicates that the induction of TRIM by certain agonists confers protective antitumour responses. Although the mechanisms underlying TRIM require further study, the current knowledge enables the experimental development of innovative therapeutic approaches to stimulate or inhibit TRIM in a context-appropriate manner, such as the stimulation of TRIM in cancer or its inhibition in inflammatory disorders.

Kidney diseases are widespread and represent a considerable medical, social and economic burden. However, there has been marked progress in understanding the immunological aspects of kidney disease. This includes the identification of distinct intrarenal immunological niches and characterization of kidney disease endotypes according to the underlying molecular immunopathology, as well as a better understanding of the pathological roles for T cells, mononuclear phagocytes and B cells and the renal elements they target. These insights have improved the diagnosis of kidney disease. Here, we discuss new developments in our understanding of kidney immunology, focusing on immune mechanisms of disease and their translational implications for the diagnosis and treatment of kidney disease. We also describe the immune-mediated crosstalk between the kidney and other organs that influences kidney disease and extrarenal inflammation.

Fate decisions during immune cell development require temporally precise changes in gene expression. Evidence suggests that the dynamic modulation of these changes is associated with the formation of diverse, membrane-less nucleoprotein assemblies that are termed biomolecular condensates. These condensates are thought to orchestrate fate-determining transcriptional and post-transcriptional processes by locally and transiently concentrating DNA or RNA molecules alongside their regulatory proteins. Findings have established a link between condensate formation and the gene regulatory networks that ensure the proper development of immune cells. Conversely, condensate dysregulation has been linked to impaired immune cell fates, including ageing and malignant transformation. This Review explores the putative mechanistic links between condensate assembly and the gene regulatory frameworks that govern normal and pathological development in the immune system.

Macrophages are the primary host cell type for infection by Mycobacterium tuberculosis in vivo. Macrophages are also key immune effector cells that mediate the control of bacterial growth. However, the specific macrophage phenotypes that are required for optimal immune control of M. tuberculosis infection in vivo remain poorly defined. There are two distinct macrophage lineages in the lung, comprising embryonically derived, tissue-resident alveolar macrophages and recruited, blood monocyte-derived interstitial macrophages. Recent studies have shown that these lineages respond divergently to similar immune environments within the tuberculosis granuloma. Here, we discuss how the differing responses of macrophage lineages might affect the control or progression of tuberculosis disease. We suggest that the ability to reprogramme macrophage responses appropriately, through immunological or chemotherapeutic routes, could help to optimize vaccines and drug regimens for tuberculosis.