Extraembryonic tissues have pivotal roles in morphogenesis and patterning of the early mammalian embryo. Developmental programmes mediated through signalling pathways and gene regulatory networks determine the sequence in which fate determination and lineage commitment of extraembryonic tissues take place, and epigenetic processes allow the memory of cell identity and state to be sustained throughout and beyond embryo development, even extending across generations. In this Review, we discuss the molecular and cellular mechanisms necessary for the different extraembryonic tissues to develop and function, from their initial specification up until the end of gastrulation, when the body plan of the embryo and the anatomical organization of its supporting extraembryonic structures are established. We examine the interaction between extraembryonic and embryonic tissues during early patterning and morphogenesis, and outline how epigenetic memory supports extraembryonic tissue development.
Telomeres protect the ends of chromosomes but shorten following cell division in the absence of telomerase activity. When telomeres become critically short or damaged, a DNA damage response is activated. Telomeres then become dysfunctional and trigger cellular senescence or death. Telomere shortening occurs with ageing and may contribute to associated maladies such as infertility, neurodegeneration, cancer, lung dysfunction and haematopoiesis disorders. Telomere dysfunction (sometimes without shortening) is associated with various diseases, known as telomere biology disorders (also known as telomeropathies). Telomere biology disorders include dyskeratosis congenita, Høyeraal–Hreidarsson syndrome, Coats plus syndrome and Revesz syndrome. Although mouse models have been invaluable in advancing telomere research, full recapitulation of human telomere-related diseases in mice has been challenging, owing to key differences between the species. In this Review, we discuss telomere protection, maintenance and damage. We highlight the differences between human and mouse telomere biology that may contribute to discrepancies between human diseases and mouse models. Finally, we discuss recent efforts to generate new ‘humanized’ mouse models to better model human telomere biology. A better understanding of the limitations of mouse telomere models will pave the road for more human-like models and further our understanding of telomere biology disorders, which will contribute towards the development of new therapies.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：