Yunyun Yang, Zhaoxian Huang, Dan Xie, Jingru Luo, Taiwei Wang, Liangliang Xie, Xiping Zhu, Qibin Zhuang, Yubao Guo, Xiuling Zhu, Jun Jin, Li Liang
Bayberry (Myrica rubra Sieb. et Zucc.) kernel is a by-products of bayberry processing and are rich in oil. This study investigates the effects of different processing methods on bayberry kernel oil (BKO) yield, including cold pressing (CP), direct solvent (n-hexane) extraction, ultrasound-assisted n-hexane extraction (UAE), steam explosion pretreatment to assist n-hexane extraction, aqueous enzyme extraction, and supercritical fluid extraction (SFE). The acid value, peroxide value, fatty acid composition, bioactive components content, and the antioxidant activity of the extracted BKO with six methods were compared. The results showed that the oil yield of bayberry kernel extracted by different methods was between 30.95% and 49.49%, and the oil yield of UAE was the highest. BKO samples extracted by different methods had lower acid value (0.39–0.59 mg KOH/g) and peroxide value (3.97–5.84 meq O2/kg), and were rich in unsaturated fatty acids (>85%), mainly including oleic (46.9%–47.9%) and linoleics (37.0%–39.5%). Meanwhile, BKO contained phytosterols (384.67–597.14 mg/100 g) and tocopherols (632.09–1227.62 µg/100 g), which was positively correlated with antioxidant activity. The volatile organic compounds (VOCs) of BKO varied on extraction methods. BKO extracted by CP and SFE showed more VOCs (25 in CP-BKO, 26 in SFE-BKO). The representative VOCs in BKO are alcohols and esters. The results provide references for further processing of BKO.
{"title":"Effects of different extraction methods on the chemical composition, antioxidant activity and flavor of bayberry (Myrica rubra Sieb. et Zucc.) kernel oil","authors":"Yunyun Yang, Zhaoxian Huang, Dan Xie, Jingru Luo, Taiwei Wang, Liangliang Xie, Xiping Zhu, Qibin Zhuang, Yubao Guo, Xiuling Zhu, Jun Jin, Li Liang","doi":"10.1111/1750-3841.70041","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.70041","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Bayberry (<i>Myrica rubra</i> Sieb. et Zucc.) kernel is a by-products of bayberry processing and are rich in oil. This study investigates the effects of different processing methods on bayberry kernel oil (BKO) yield, including cold pressing (CP), direct solvent (<i>n</i>-hexane) extraction, ultrasound-assisted <i>n</i>-hexane extraction (UAE), steam explosion pretreatment to assist <i>n</i>-hexane extraction, aqueous enzyme extraction, and supercritical fluid extraction (SFE). The acid value, peroxide value, fatty acid composition, bioactive components content, and the antioxidant activity of the extracted BKO with six methods were compared. The results showed that the oil yield of bayberry kernel extracted by different methods was between 30.95% and 49.49%, and the oil yield of UAE was the highest. BKO samples extracted by different methods had lower acid value (0.39–0.59 mg KOH/g) and peroxide value (3.97–5.84 meq O<sub>2</sub>/kg), and were rich in unsaturated fatty acids (>85%), mainly including oleic (46.9%–47.9%) and linoleics (37.0%–39.5%). Meanwhile, BKO contained phytosterols (384.67–597.14 mg/100 g) and tocopherols (632.09–1227.62 µg/100 g), which was positively correlated with antioxidant activity. The volatile organic compounds (VOCs) of BKO varied on extraction methods. BKO extracted by CP and SFE showed more VOCs (25 in CP-BKO, 26 in SFE-BKO). The representative VOCs in BKO are alcohols and esters. The results provide references for further processing of BKO.</p>","PeriodicalId":193,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Food Science","volume":"90 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143379955","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Modern diets are increasingly dominated by ultra-processed foods, a shift driven by urbanization and lifestyle changes. Among these, ultra-processed meat products (UPMPs) are particularly popular due to their appealing flavor and texture. However, emerging evidence highlights potential health risks associated with UPMPs. Although meat products are rich in high-quality proteins, the processing methods used in UPMPs can affect protein digestibility. Moderate processing techniques, such as sous-vide cooking, fermentation, and enzymatic tenderization, can enhance digestion and nutrient absorption, whereas excessive processing may lead to protein aggregation and cross-linking, reducing protein digestibility. Additionally, the overuse of additives and excessive thermal processing are key concerns in UPMP production, leading to the formation of potentially harmful substances, including acrylamide, heterocyclic amines, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, and advanced glycation end products. This review examines how different processing techniques influence protein digestibility in UPMPs, elucidates the pathways through which harmful substances are generated, and assesses the impact of UPMPs on gut health, with a focus on gut microbiota and the colon. Our synthesis of current research indicates that excessive consumption of UPMPs contributes to gut microbiota dysbiosis, compromises the gut barrier, and increases the risk of colorectal cancer, though the dose-dependent effects require further clarification. Future research should focus on key parameters of moderate processing, explore natural alternatives to harmful additives, examine the dose–response relationship between UPMP consumption and health risks, and evaluate how individual factors, such as genetics and metabolism, influence the health impacts of UPMPs.
{"title":"Impact of ultra-processed meat products on human health: Review and outlook","authors":"Dan Yang, Chengpu Chen, Di Zhao, Chunbao Li","doi":"10.1111/1750-3841.70040","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.70040","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Modern diets are increasingly dominated by ultra-processed foods, a shift driven by urbanization and lifestyle changes. Among these, ultra-processed meat products (UPMPs) are particularly popular due to their appealing flavor and texture. However, emerging evidence highlights potential health risks associated with UPMPs. Although meat products are rich in high-quality proteins, the processing methods used in UPMPs can affect protein digestibility. Moderate processing techniques, such as sous-vide cooking, fermentation, and enzymatic tenderization, can enhance digestion and nutrient absorption, whereas excessive processing may lead to protein aggregation and cross-linking, reducing protein digestibility. Additionally, the overuse of additives and excessive thermal processing are key concerns in UPMP production, leading to the formation of potentially harmful substances, including acrylamide, heterocyclic amines, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, and advanced glycation end products. This review examines how different processing techniques influence protein digestibility in UPMPs, elucidates the pathways through which harmful substances are generated, and assesses the impact of UPMPs on gut health, with a focus on gut microbiota and the colon. Our synthesis of current research indicates that excessive consumption of UPMPs contributes to gut microbiota dysbiosis, compromises the gut barrier, and increases the risk of colorectal cancer, though the dose-dependent effects require further clarification. Future research should focus on key parameters of moderate processing, explore natural alternatives to harmful additives, examine the dose–response relationship between UPMP consumption and health risks, and evaluate how individual factors, such as genetics and metabolism, influence the health impacts of UPMPs.</p>","PeriodicalId":193,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Food Science","volume":"90 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1750-3841.70040","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143380666","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This study investigated the effects of freeze-thawing (FT), blanching (BL), and ultrasound (US) pretreatments on the drying characteristics and quality of quince peels before hot air drying (HAD) at 60°C. All three pretreatments could decrease the moisture ratio (MR) at any drying time point and increase the effective moisture diffusivity (Deff). The maximum drying rate (DR) of the peels pretreated with BL and US was 1.4 times that of unpretreated peels. The MR–t curves of the peels were highly fitted to the Midilli model. The drying time to reach equilibrium dry basis moisture content for peels pretreated with FT, BL, and US was reduced by 33.33%, 58.33%, and 66.67%, respectively, compared to 4 h for unpretreated peels. The color of US pretreatment peels was closest to that of fresh peels. The total phenolics content and total flavonoids content in the peels were in the order of US > unpretreated > BL > FT. Notably, the rutin content of US pretreatment peels was 4.15 ± 0.10 mg/g DW, which was 15% higher than that of unpretreated peels. In summary, US is the most recommended pretreatment to improve the drying efficiency and quality of HAD quince peels.
{"title":"Effects of freeze-thawing, blanching, and ultrasound pretreatments on drying efficiency and quality of quince peels","authors":"Pei Wang, Wenping Lv, Hongxin Wang","doi":"10.1111/1750-3841.70024","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.70024","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study investigated the effects of freeze-thawing (FT), blanching (BL), and ultrasound (US) pretreatments on the drying characteristics and quality of quince peels before hot air drying (HAD) at 60°C. All three pretreatments could decrease the moisture ratio (MR) at any drying time point and increase the effective moisture diffusivity (<i>D</i><sub>eff</sub>). The maximum drying rate (DR) of the peels pretreated with BL and US was 1.4 times that of unpretreated peels. The MR–t curves of the peels were highly fitted to the Midilli model. The drying time to reach equilibrium dry basis moisture content for peels pretreated with FT, BL, and US was reduced by 33.33%, 58.33%, and 66.67%, respectively, compared to 4 h for unpretreated peels. The color of US pretreatment peels was closest to that of fresh peels. The total phenolics content and total flavonoids content in the peels were in the order of US > unpretreated > BL > FT. Notably, the rutin content of US pretreatment peels was 4.15 ± 0.10 mg/g DW, which was 15% higher than that of unpretreated peels. In summary, US is the most recommended pretreatment to improve the drying efficiency and quality of HAD quince peels.</p>","PeriodicalId":193,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Food Science","volume":"90 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143362744","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
<p>The role played by foods and dietary patterns in human well-being goes beyond the mere nutritional contribution since they influence our physical and mental health, evoke hedonic sensations, and even influence our mood. Health authorities and consumers (and society as a whole) are increasingly concerned about the relationship between the consumption of processed foods (PF) and ultra-processed foods (UPF) on the onset of chronic diseases such as diabesity (type 2 diabetes [T2D] in obese individuals) or some types of cancer. There are well-founded reasons for this concern since (1) diabesity, frequently accompanied by cardiovascular events, is one of the main causes of death in developed countries, and (2) the consumption of UPF has increased exponentially in those countries in the last decade. In the United States, where the prevalence of obesity is above 40% (Phelps et al., <span>2024</span>) and 1 out of 10 people suffer from T2D (Fang et al., <span>2023</span>), the consumption of UPFs consists, on average, of more than 50% of the total energy intake (Touvier et al., <span>2023</span>). The connection between UPF and poor health, however, is not well understood for several reasons. First, the concept of UPF is not well defined, and the renown Nova classification is openly criticized for being inconsistent and based on flawed criteria (Ahrné et al., <span>2024</span>; Petrus et al., <span>2021</span>). Some authors would agree that certain PF/UPF, such as fortified foods or plant-based analogues of animal foods, may not be ascribed as potentially harmful, while others state the potential negative influence on health of these same fabricated foods. In line with this controversy, the correlations based on epidemiological/observational studies do not imply causality, and hence, the precise UPF/food components likely responsible for such poor health are currently unknown. Furthermore, industrial food processing has enabled indisputable advances toward convenience, food safety, and palatability that may be regarded as positive contributions. Bearing all these controversies and challenges in mind, this special issue (SI) was conceived as a platform for food scientists to provide their critical opinion on this hot topic via concise reviews and to publish some original results from innovative studies. This SI may serve as an inspirational set of works from which food scientists may be encouraged to design and carry out more challenging studies aimed to understand the impact of processing on food structure and composition and that, in turn, on nutrition and health outcomes. With newfound, transparent, and scientifically based data, the food industry shall be able to design and produce palatable, and yet, satiating, nutritious, and healthy PF and UPF.</p><p>Sincerely,</p><p>Mario Estévez, DVM, PhD</p><p>Guest Editor, JFS Special Issue: Ultra-Processed Foods</p><p>Scientific Editor, <i>Journal of Food Science</i></p><p>Professor, Universidad de Extremad
{"title":"Special issue on ultra-processed foods","authors":"Mario Estévez","doi":"10.1111/1750-3841.70052","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.70052","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The role played by foods and dietary patterns in human well-being goes beyond the mere nutritional contribution since they influence our physical and mental health, evoke hedonic sensations, and even influence our mood. Health authorities and consumers (and society as a whole) are increasingly concerned about the relationship between the consumption of processed foods (PF) and ultra-processed foods (UPF) on the onset of chronic diseases such as diabesity (type 2 diabetes [T2D] in obese individuals) or some types of cancer. There are well-founded reasons for this concern since (1) diabesity, frequently accompanied by cardiovascular events, is one of the main causes of death in developed countries, and (2) the consumption of UPF has increased exponentially in those countries in the last decade. In the United States, where the prevalence of obesity is above 40% (Phelps et al., <span>2024</span>) and 1 out of 10 people suffer from T2D (Fang et al., <span>2023</span>), the consumption of UPFs consists, on average, of more than 50% of the total energy intake (Touvier et al., <span>2023</span>). The connection between UPF and poor health, however, is not well understood for several reasons. First, the concept of UPF is not well defined, and the renown Nova classification is openly criticized for being inconsistent and based on flawed criteria (Ahrné et al., <span>2024</span>; Petrus et al., <span>2021</span>). Some authors would agree that certain PF/UPF, such as fortified foods or plant-based analogues of animal foods, may not be ascribed as potentially harmful, while others state the potential negative influence on health of these same fabricated foods. In line with this controversy, the correlations based on epidemiological/observational studies do not imply causality, and hence, the precise UPF/food components likely responsible for such poor health are currently unknown. Furthermore, industrial food processing has enabled indisputable advances toward convenience, food safety, and palatability that may be regarded as positive contributions. Bearing all these controversies and challenges in mind, this special issue (SI) was conceived as a platform for food scientists to provide their critical opinion on this hot topic via concise reviews and to publish some original results from innovative studies. This SI may serve as an inspirational set of works from which food scientists may be encouraged to design and carry out more challenging studies aimed to understand the impact of processing on food structure and composition and that, in turn, on nutrition and health outcomes. With newfound, transparent, and scientifically based data, the food industry shall be able to design and produce palatable, and yet, satiating, nutritious, and healthy PF and UPF.</p><p>Sincerely,</p><p>Mario Estévez, DVM, PhD</p><p>Guest Editor, JFS Special Issue: Ultra-Processed Foods</p><p>Scientific Editor, <i>Journal of Food Science</i></p><p>Professor, Universidad de Extremad","PeriodicalId":193,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Food Science","volume":"90 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1750-3841.70052","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143362592","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Kayise Hypercia Maseko, Thierry Regnier, Paul Bartels, Belinda Meiring
World agriculture endures an immense challenge in feeding the world's growing population in the face of several productivity and environmental threats. Yet, the demand for alternative protein sources is rapidly increasing as a result of population growth, including health and ethical concerns associated with meat consumption. Edible mushroom species contain a high composition of protein, fiber, vitamins, and a variety of minerals, and are regarded as sufficient sources of food products. Pleurotus genus is one of the most extensively studied edible fungi due to its exceptional physical, chemical, biological, and enzymatic properties. The assessment on the effects of the in vitro culture media composition, including carbon and nitrogen sources, pH, and temperature are all necessary for enhancing mushroom mycelial biomass growth and production. Mycoprotein as a fungal-derived protein source has been identified as a more sustainable and healthier meat substitute due to its fibrous structure, high nutritional value, and unique functional profile. Its distinctive production method results in a much lower carbon and water footprint than traditional farming methods. A systemic transition from traditional agriculture to more sustainable cellular agriculture using cell-cultivation methods to create animal products has been proposed and initiated. This review can provide an overview on the various processes involved in the production and usage of mycelium as an alternative protein source in hybrid cell-cultured meat production.
{"title":"Mushroom mycelia as sustainable alternative proteins for the production of hybrid cell-cultured meat: A review","authors":"Kayise Hypercia Maseko, Thierry Regnier, Paul Bartels, Belinda Meiring","doi":"10.1111/1750-3841.70060","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.70060","url":null,"abstract":"<p>World agriculture endures an immense challenge in feeding the world's growing population in the face of several productivity and environmental threats. Yet, the demand for alternative protein sources is rapidly increasing as a result of population growth, including health and ethical concerns associated with meat consumption. Edible mushroom species contain a high composition of protein, fiber, vitamins, and a variety of minerals, and are regarded as sufficient sources of food products. <i>Pleurotus</i> genus is one of the most extensively studied edible fungi due to its exceptional physical, chemical, biological, and enzymatic properties. The assessment on the effects of the in vitro culture media composition, including carbon and nitrogen sources, pH, and temperature are all necessary for enhancing mushroom mycelial biomass growth and production. Mycoprotein as a fungal-derived protein source has been identified as a more sustainable and healthier meat substitute due to its fibrous structure, high nutritional value, and unique functional profile. Its distinctive production method results in a much lower carbon and water footprint than traditional farming methods. A systemic transition from traditional agriculture to more sustainable cellular agriculture using cell-cultivation methods to create animal products has been proposed and initiated. This review can provide an overview on the various processes involved in the production and usage of mycelium as an alternative protein source in hybrid cell-cultured meat production.</p>","PeriodicalId":193,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Food Science","volume":"90 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1750-3841.70060","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143362743","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}