The Thai Osteoporosis Foundation (TOPF) is an academic organization that consists of a multidisciplinary group of healthcare professionals managing osteoporosis. The first clinical practice guideline for diagnosing and managing osteoporosis in Thailand was published by the TOPF in 2010, then updated in 2016 and 2021. This paper presents important updates of the guideline for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in Thailand.
Methods
A panel of experts in the field of osteoporosis was recruited by the TOPF to review and update the TOPF position statement from 2016. Evidence was searched using the MEDLINE database through PubMed. Primary writers submitted their first drafts, which were reviewed, discussed, and integrated into the final document. Recommendations are based on reviews of the clinical evidence and experts' opinions. The recommendations are classified using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation classification system.
Results
The updated guideline comprises 90 recommendations divided into 12 main topics. This paper summarizes the recommendations focused on 4 main topics: the diagnosis and evaluation of osteoporosis, fracture risk assessment and indications for bone mineral density measurement, fracture risk categorization, management according to fracture risk, and pharmacological management of osteoporosis.
Conclusions
This updated clinical practice guideline is a practical tool to assist healthcare professionals in diagnosing, evaluating, and managing osteoporosis in Thailand.
{"title":"Summary of the Thai Osteoporosis Foundation (TOPF) Clinical Practice Guideline on the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis 2021","authors":"Natthinee Charatcharoenwitthaya , Unnop Jaisamrarn , Thawee Songpatanasilp , Vilai Kuptniratsaikul , Aasis Unnanuntana , Chanika Sritara , Hataikarn Nimitphong , Lalita Wattanachanya , Pojchong Chotiyarnwong , Tanawat Amphansap , Ong-Art Phruetthiphat , Thanut Valleenukul , Sumapa Chaiamnuay , Aisawan Petchlorlian , Varalak Srinonprasert , Sirakarn Tejavanija , Wasuwat Kitisomprayoonkul , Piyapat Dajpratham , Sukanya Chaikittisilpa , Woraluk Somboonporn","doi":"10.1016/j.afos.2023.06.001","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.afos.2023.06.001","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The Thai Osteoporosis Foundation (TOPF) is an academic organization that consists of a multidisciplinary group of healthcare professionals managing osteoporosis. The first clinical practice guideline for diagnosing and managing osteoporosis in Thailand was published by the TOPF in 2010, then updated in 2016 and 2021. This paper presents important updates of the guideline for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in Thailand.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A panel of experts in the field of osteoporosis was recruited by the TOPF to review and update the TOPF position statement from 2016. Evidence was searched using the MEDLINE database through PubMed. Primary writers submitted their first drafts, which were reviewed, discussed, and integrated into the final document. Recommendations are based on reviews of the clinical evidence and experts' opinions. The recommendations are classified using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation classification system.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The updated guideline comprises 90 recommendations divided into 12 main topics. This paper summarizes the recommendations focused on 4 main topics: the diagnosis and evaluation of osteoporosis, fracture risk assessment and indications for bone mineral density measurement, fracture risk categorization, management according to fracture risk, and pharmacological management of osteoporosis.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This updated clinical practice guideline is a practical tool to assist healthcare professionals in diagnosing, evaluating, and managing osteoporosis in Thailand.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19701,"journal":{"name":"Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia","volume":"9 2","pages":"Pages 45-52"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/c7/ae/main.PMC10366425.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9873159","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Graves' disease (GD) is the most common cause of thyrotoxicosis. There are many studies that have evaluated bone mineral density (BMD) in Graves’ disease. However, the strength of a bone also depends on its microarchitecture which can be assessed by various techniques. Trabecular bone score (TBS) is a new method for assessing bone microarchitecture that is non-invasive and easily performed.
Methods
The present study was a cross-sectional study that involved 50 patients with active GD and 50 healthy controls. Both groups were subjected to an assessment of biochemical parameters followed by measurement of BMD and TBS on the same dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) machine.
Results
The mean age of patients with active GD (N = 50) was 31.9 ± 10.9 years while that of controls was 31.2 ± 4.9 years (P = 0.640). The female: male ratio was the same for both groups (F = 31, M = 19). The mean lumbar spine BMD, femoral neck BMD, total hip BMD, and distal radius BMD were significantly reduced in GD when compared to that in controls. The mean absolute lumbar spine TBS in GD was 1.263 ± 0.101 while that in controls was 1.368 ± 0.073 (P < 0.001). On multivariate regression analysis, the factors that predicted TBS were serum thyroxine (T4) and L1-L4 BMD.
Conclusions
Patients with Graves’ disease had reduced bone density at all sites and degraded microarchitecture. Long-term studies are required to understand the pattern of recovery of bone microarchitecture after the restoration of euthyroidism.
{"title":"Bone microarchitecture and bone mineral density in Graves’ disease","authors":"Hiya Boro , Rakhi Malhotra , Suraj Kubihal , Saurav Khatiwada , Vinay Dogra , Velmurugan Mannar , Ashok Kumar Ahirwar , Vandana Rastogi","doi":"10.1016/j.afos.2023.05.001","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.afos.2023.05.001","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Graves' disease (GD) is the most common cause of thyrotoxicosis. There are many studies that have evaluated bone mineral density (BMD) in Graves’ disease. However, the strength of a bone also depends on its microarchitecture which can be assessed by various techniques. Trabecular bone score (TBS) is a new method for assessing bone microarchitecture that is non-invasive and easily performed.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The present study was a cross-sectional study that involved 50 patients with active GD and 50 healthy controls. Both groups were subjected to an assessment of biochemical parameters followed by measurement of BMD and TBS on the same dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) machine.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The mean age of patients with active GD (N = 50) was 31.9 ± 10.9 years while that of controls was 31.2 ± 4.9 years (P = 0.640). The female: male ratio was the same for both groups (F = 31, M = 19). The mean lumbar spine BMD, femoral neck BMD, total hip BMD, and distal radius BMD were significantly reduced in GD when compared to that in controls. The mean absolute lumbar spine TBS in GD was 1.263 ± 0.101 while that in controls was 1.368 ± 0.073 (P < 0.001). On multivariate regression analysis, the factors that predicted TBS were serum thyroxine (T4) and L<sub>1</sub>-L<sub>4</sub> BMD.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Patients with Graves’ disease had reduced bone density at all sites and degraded microarchitecture. Long-term studies are required to understand the pattern of recovery of bone microarchitecture after the restoration of euthyroidism.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19701,"journal":{"name":"Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia","volume":"9 2","pages":"Pages 70-75"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/22/19/main.PMC10366428.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9873153","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-06-01DOI: 10.1016/j.afos.2023.05.002
Nipith Charoenngam , Chatlert Pongchaiyakul
Osteoporosis is a major public health issue in Thailand, which increased morbidity, mortality, and health-care utilization. The objective of this review is to provide current perspectives on epidemiology, evaluation and management of osteoporosis in Thailand. According to epidemiologic data, the prevalence of osteoporosis and the incidence of hip fracture were comparable to the rest of the world. However, among Thai postmenopausal women, the prevalence of asymptomatic vertebral fracture was disproportionately high. In addition to established risk factors, conditions that may affect the risk of osteoporosis in the Thai population include certain genetic variants, thalassemia, vitamin D deficiency, and low dietary calcium intake, which requires further investigations to draw conclusions. In 2021, the Thai Osteoporosis Foundation released a new Clinical Practice Guideline that provides up-to-date evidence-based recommendations for evaluation and management of osteoporosis. Nonetheless, more research is required to provide local evidence in a variety of areas to guide management of osteoporosis in Thailand. These include epidemiology of distal radial fracture, the optimal intervention threshold of the Thai-specific Fracture Risk Assessment Tool model, screening for asymptomatic vertebral fracture, and the economic evaluation of osteoporosis management options, including fracture liaison service.
{"title":"Current issues in evaluation and management of osteoporosis in Thailand","authors":"Nipith Charoenngam , Chatlert Pongchaiyakul","doi":"10.1016/j.afos.2023.05.002","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.afos.2023.05.002","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Osteoporosis is a major public health issue in Thailand, which increased morbidity, mortality, and health-care utilization. The objective of this review is to provide current perspectives on epidemiology, evaluation and management of osteoporosis in Thailand. According to epidemiologic data, the prevalence of osteoporosis and the incidence of hip fracture were comparable to the rest of the world. However, among Thai postmenopausal women, the prevalence of asymptomatic vertebral fracture was disproportionately high. In addition to established risk factors, conditions that may affect the risk of osteoporosis in the Thai population include certain genetic variants, thalassemia, vitamin D deficiency, and low dietary calcium intake, which requires further investigations to draw conclusions. In 2021, the Thai Osteoporosis Foundation released a new Clinical Practice Guideline that provides up-to-date evidence-based recommendations for evaluation and management of osteoporosis. Nonetheless, more research is required to provide local evidence in a variety of areas to guide management of osteoporosis in Thailand. These include epidemiology of distal radial fracture, the optimal intervention threshold of the Thai-specific Fracture Risk Assessment Tool model, screening for asymptomatic vertebral fracture, and the economic evaluation of osteoporosis management options, including fracture liaison service.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19701,"journal":{"name":"Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia","volume":"9 2","pages":"Pages 53-59"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b7/05/main.PMC10366423.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9873155","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-06-01DOI: 10.1016/j.afos.2023.06.002
Terence Ing Wei Ong , Lee Ling Lim , Siew Pheng Chan , Winnie Siew Swee Chee , Alan Swee Hock Ch’ng , Elizabeth Gar Mit Chong , Premitha Damodaran , Fen Lee Hew , Luqman bin Ibrahim , Hui Min Khor , Pauline Siew Mei Lai , Joon Kiong Lee , Ai Lee Lim , Boon Ping Lim , Sharmila Sunita Paramasivam , Jeyakantha Ratnasingam , Yew Siong Siow , Alexander Tong Boon Tan , Nagammai Thiagarajan , Swan Sim Yeap
Objectives
The aim of these Clinical Practice Guidelines is to provide evidence-based recommendations to assist healthcare providers in the screening, diagnosis and management of patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis (OP).
Methods
A list of key clinical questions on the assessment, diagnosis and treatment of OP was formulated. A literature search using the PubMed, Medline, Cochrane Databases of Systematic Reviews, and OVID electronic databases identified all relevant articles on OP based on the key clinical questions, from 2014 onwards, to update from the 2015 edition. The articles were graded using the SIGN50 format. For each statement, studies with the highest level of evidence were used to frame the recommendation.
Results
This article summarizes the diagnostic and treatment pathways for postmenopausal OP. Risk stratification of patients with OP encompasses clinical risk factors, bone mineral density measurements and FRAX risk estimates. Non-pharmacological measures including adequate calcium and vitamin D, regular exercise and falls prevention are recommended. Pharmacological measures depend on patients’ fracture risk status. Very high-risk individuals are recommended for treatment with an anabolic agent, if available, followed by an anti-resorptive agent. Alternatively, parenteral anti-resorptive agents can be used. High-risk individuals should be treated with anti-resorptive agents. In low-risk individuals, menopausal hormone replacement or selective estrogen receptor modulators can be used, if indicated. Patients should be assessed regularly to monitor treatment response and treatment adjusted, as appropriate.
Conclusions
The pathways for the management of postmenopausal OP in Malaysia have been updated. Incorporation of fracture risk stratification can guide appropriate treatment.
{"title":"A summary of the Malaysian Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of postmenopausal osteoporosis, 2022","authors":"Terence Ing Wei Ong , Lee Ling Lim , Siew Pheng Chan , Winnie Siew Swee Chee , Alan Swee Hock Ch’ng , Elizabeth Gar Mit Chong , Premitha Damodaran , Fen Lee Hew , Luqman bin Ibrahim , Hui Min Khor , Pauline Siew Mei Lai , Joon Kiong Lee , Ai Lee Lim , Boon Ping Lim , Sharmila Sunita Paramasivam , Jeyakantha Ratnasingam , Yew Siong Siow , Alexander Tong Boon Tan , Nagammai Thiagarajan , Swan Sim Yeap","doi":"10.1016/j.afos.2023.06.002","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.afos.2023.06.002","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The aim of these Clinical Practice Guidelines is to provide evidence-based recommendations to assist healthcare providers in the screening, diagnosis and management of patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis (OP).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A list of key clinical questions on the assessment, diagnosis and treatment of OP was formulated. A literature search using the PubMed, Medline, Cochrane Databases of Systematic Reviews, and OVID electronic databases identified all relevant articles on OP based on the key clinical questions, from 2014 onwards, to update from the 2015 edition. The articles were graded using the SIGN50 format. For each statement, studies with the highest level of evidence were used to frame the recommendation.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>This article summarizes the diagnostic and treatment pathways for postmenopausal OP. Risk stratification of patients with OP encompasses clinical risk factors, bone mineral density measurements and FRAX risk estimates. Non-pharmacological measures including adequate calcium and vitamin D, regular exercise and falls prevention are recommended. Pharmacological measures depend on patients’ fracture risk status. Very high-risk individuals are recommended for treatment with an anabolic agent, if available, followed by an anti-resorptive agent. Alternatively, parenteral anti-resorptive agents can be used. High-risk individuals should be treated with anti-resorptive agents. In low-risk individuals, menopausal hormone replacement or selective estrogen receptor modulators can be used, if indicated. Patients should be assessed regularly to monitor treatment response and treatment adjusted, as appropriate.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The pathways for the management of postmenopausal OP in Malaysia have been updated. Incorporation of fracture risk stratification can guide appropriate treatment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19701,"journal":{"name":"Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia","volume":"9 2","pages":"Pages 60-69"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/55/5a/main.PMC10366466.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9873161","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-05-11DOI: 10.1101/2023.05.10.23289825
D. T. Nguyen, T. Ho-Le, L. Pham, V. P. Ho-Van, T. Hoang, T. Tran, S. Frost, T. Nguyen
Background and Aim: Osteoporotic fracture is a significant public health burden associated with increased mortality risk and substantial healthcare costs. Accurate and early identification of high-risk individuals and mitigation of their risks is a core part of the treatment and prevention of fractures. We aimed to introduce a digital tool called 'BONEcheck' for personalized bone health assessment. Methods: The development of BONEcheck primarily utilized data from the prospective population-based Dubbo Osteoporosis Epidemiology Study and the Danish Nationwide Registry. BONEcheck has 3 modules: input data, risk estimates, and risk context. Input variables include age, gender, prior fracture, fall incidence, bone mineral density (BMD), comorbidities, and genetic variants associated with BMD. By utilizing published methodologies, BONEcheck generates output related to the likelihood of fracture and its associated outcomes. The vocabulary utilized to convey risk estimation and management is tailored to individuals with a reading proficiency at level 8 or above. Results: The tool is designed for men and women aged 50 years and older who either have or have not sustained a fracture. Based on the input variables, BONEcheck estimates the probability of any fragility and hip fracture within 5 years, skeletal age, subsequent fracture, genetic risk score, and recommended interval for repeating BMD. The probability of fracture is shown in both numeric and human icon array formats. The risk is also presented in the context of treatment and management options based on Australian guidelines. Skeletal age was estimated as the sum of chronological age and years of life lost due to a fracture or exposure to risk factors that elevate mortality risk. In its entirety, BONEcheck is a system of algorithms translated into a single platform for personalized osteoporosis and fracture risk assessment. Conclusions: BONEcheck is a new system of algorithms that aims to offer not only fracture risk probability but also contextualize the efficacy of anti-fracture measures concerning the survival benefits. The tool can enable doctors and patients to engage in well-informed discussions and make decisions based on the patient's risk profile. Public access to BONEcheck is available via https://bonecheck.org and in Apple Store (iOS) and Google Play (Android).
{"title":"BONEcheck: a digital tool for personalized bone health assessment","authors":"D. T. Nguyen, T. Ho-Le, L. Pham, V. P. Ho-Van, T. Hoang, T. Tran, S. Frost, T. Nguyen","doi":"10.1101/2023.05.10.23289825","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.05.10.23289825","url":null,"abstract":"Background and Aim: Osteoporotic fracture is a significant public health burden associated with increased mortality risk and substantial healthcare costs. Accurate and early identification of high-risk individuals and mitigation of their risks is a core part of the treatment and prevention of fractures. We aimed to introduce a digital tool called 'BONEcheck' for personalized bone health assessment. Methods: The development of BONEcheck primarily utilized data from the prospective population-based Dubbo Osteoporosis Epidemiology Study and the Danish Nationwide Registry. BONEcheck has 3 modules: input data, risk estimates, and risk context. Input variables include age, gender, prior fracture, fall incidence, bone mineral density (BMD), comorbidities, and genetic variants associated with BMD. By utilizing published methodologies, BONEcheck generates output related to the likelihood of fracture and its associated outcomes. The vocabulary utilized to convey risk estimation and management is tailored to individuals with a reading proficiency at level 8 or above. Results: The tool is designed for men and women aged 50 years and older who either have or have not sustained a fracture. Based on the input variables, BONEcheck estimates the probability of any fragility and hip fracture within 5 years, skeletal age, subsequent fracture, genetic risk score, and recommended interval for repeating BMD. The probability of fracture is shown in both numeric and human icon array formats. The risk is also presented in the context of treatment and management options based on Australian guidelines. Skeletal age was estimated as the sum of chronological age and years of life lost due to a fracture or exposure to risk factors that elevate mortality risk. In its entirety, BONEcheck is a system of algorithms translated into a single platform for personalized osteoporosis and fracture risk assessment. Conclusions: BONEcheck is a new system of algorithms that aims to offer not only fracture risk probability but also contextualize the efficacy of anti-fracture measures concerning the survival benefits. The tool can enable doctors and patients to engage in well-informed discussions and make decisions based on the patient's risk profile. Public access to BONEcheck is available via https://bonecheck.org and in Apple Store (iOS) and Google Play (Android).","PeriodicalId":19701,"journal":{"name":"Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2023-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45188661","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-03-01DOI: 10.1016/j.afos.2023.03.009
Ching-Lung Cheung , Gloria HY. Li , Hang-Long Li , Constance Mak , Kathryn CB. Tan , Annie WC. Kung
Objectives
To enhance the public awareness and facilitate diagnosis of osteoporosis, we aim to develop a new Chinese Osteoporosis Screening Algorithm (COSA) to identify people at high risk of osteoporosis.
Methods
A total of 4747 postmenopausal women and men aged ≥ 50 from the Hong Kong Osteoporosis Study were randomly split into a development (N = 2373) and an internal validation cohort (N = 2374). An external validation cohort comprising 1876 community-dwelling subjects was used to evaluate the positive predictive value (PPV).
Results
Among 11 predictors included, age, sex, weight, and history of fracture were significantly associated with osteoporosis after correction for multiple testing. Age- and sex-stratified models were developed due to the presence of significant sex and age interactions. The area under the curve of the COSA in the internal validation cohort was 0.761 (95% CI, 0.711–0.811), 0.822 (95% CI, 0.792–0.851), and 0.946 (95% CI, 0.908–0.984) for women aged < 65, women aged ≥ 65, and men, respectively. The COSA demonstrated improved reclassification performance when compared to Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool for Asians. In the external validation cohort, the PPV of COSA was 40.6%, 59.4%, and 19.4% for women aged < 65, women aged ≥ 65, and men, respectively. In addition, COSA > 0 was associated with an increased 10-year risk of hip fracture in women ≥ 65 (OR, 4.65; 95% CI, 2.24–9.65) and men (OR, 11.51; 95% CI, 4.16–31.81).
Conclusions
We have developed and validated a new osteoporosis screening algorithm, COSA, specific for Hong Kong Chinese.
{"title":"Development and validation of the Chinese osteoporosis screening algorithm (COSA) in identification of people with high risk of osteoporosis","authors":"Ching-Lung Cheung , Gloria HY. Li , Hang-Long Li , Constance Mak , Kathryn CB. Tan , Annie WC. Kung","doi":"10.1016/j.afos.2023.03.009","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.afos.2023.03.009","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To enhance the public awareness and facilitate diagnosis of osteoporosis, we aim to develop a new Chinese Osteoporosis Screening Algorithm (COSA) to identify people at high risk of osteoporosis.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A total of 4747 postmenopausal women and men aged ≥ 50 from the Hong Kong Osteoporosis Study were randomly split into a development (N = 2373) and an internal validation cohort (N = 2374). An external validation cohort comprising 1876 community-dwelling subjects was used to evaluate the positive predictive value (PPV).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Among 11 predictors included, age, sex, weight, and history of fracture were significantly associated with osteoporosis after correction for multiple testing. Age- and sex-stratified models were developed due to the presence of significant sex and age interactions. The area under the curve of the COSA in the internal validation cohort was 0.761 (95% CI, 0.711–0.811), 0.822 (95% CI, 0.792–0.851), and 0.946 (95% CI, 0.908–0.984) for women aged < 65, women aged ≥ 65, and men, respectively. The COSA demonstrated improved reclassification performance when compared to Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool for Asians. In the external validation cohort, the PPV of COSA was 40.6%, 59.4%, and 19.4% for women aged < 65, women aged ≥ 65, and men, respectively. In addition, COSA > 0 was associated with an increased 10-year risk of hip fracture in women ≥ 65 (OR, 4.65; 95% CI, 2.24–9.65) and men (OR, 11.51; 95% CI, 4.16–31.81).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>We have developed and validated a new osteoporosis screening algorithm, COSA, specific for Hong Kong Chinese.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19701,"journal":{"name":"Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia","volume":"9 1","pages":"Pages 8-13"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10111958/pdf/main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9385452","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Reply on “Exploring optimal supplementation for people with vitamin D deficiency”","authors":"Tanawat Amphansap, Atiporn Therdyothin, Nitirat Stitkitti, Lertkong Nitiwarangkul, Vajarin Phiphobmongkol","doi":"10.1016/j.afos.2023.03.007","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.afos.2023.03.007","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":19701,"journal":{"name":"Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia","volume":"9 1","pages":"Pages 40-41"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10111936/pdf/main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9754520","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-03-01DOI: 10.1016/j.afos.2023.03.004
Yì Xiáng J. Wáng , Jason C.S. Leung , Patti M.S. Lam , Timothy C.Y. Kwok
Objectives
To define what portion of older community men with what severity of radiographic osteoporotic-like vertebral fracture (OLVF) correspond to what low T-score status.
Methods
There were 755 community Chinese men (age: 76.4 ± 6.7 years) with thoracic and lumbar spine radiographs, and hip and lumbar spine bone mineral density measures. For each vertebra in a subject, a score of 0, -0.5, −1, −1.5, −2, −2.5, and −3 was assigned for no OLVF or OLVF of <20%, ≥ 20–25%, ≥ 2 5%–1/3, ≥ 1/3–40%, ≥ 40%–2/3, and ≥ 2/3 vertebral height loss, respectively. OLVFss was defined as the summed score of vertebrae T4 to L5. OLVFss and T-scores were ranked from the smallest to the largest values.
Results
OLVFss of −2, −2.5, −3, corresponded to a mean femoral neck T-score of −2.297 (range: -2.355∼-2.247), −2.494 (range: -2.637∼ −2.363), and −2.773 (range: -2.898∼-2.643), a mean hip T-score of-2.311 (range: -2.420∼-2.234), −2.572 (range: -2.708∼-2.432), −2.911 (range: -3.134∼-2.708), a mean lumbar spine T-score of −2.495 (range: -2.656∼-2.403), −2.931 (range: -3.255∼-2.664), and −3.369 (range: -3.525∼-3.258). The Pearson correlation value of OLVFss and T-score of femoral neck, hip and lumbar spine was r = 0.21, 0.26, and 0.22 (all P < 0.0001).
Conclusions
A single severe grade radiological OLVF (≥ 40% height loss) or OLVFss ≤ −2.5 suggest the subject is osteoporotic, and a single collapse grade (≥ 2/3 height loss) OLVF or OLVFss ≤ −3 meets osteoporosis diagnosis criterion. The results highlight the difficulty of diagnosing osteoporotic vertebral fractures among Chinese older men.
{"title":"Conversion of osteoporotic-like vertebral fracture severity score to osteoporosis T-score equivalent status: A framework study for older Chinese men","authors":"Yì Xiáng J. Wáng , Jason C.S. Leung , Patti M.S. Lam , Timothy C.Y. Kwok","doi":"10.1016/j.afos.2023.03.004","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.afos.2023.03.004","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To define what portion of older community men with what severity of radiographic osteoporotic-like vertebral fracture (OLVF) correspond to what low T-score status.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>There were 755 community Chinese men (age: 76.4 ± 6.7 years) with thoracic and lumbar spine radiographs, and hip and lumbar spine bone mineral density measures. For each vertebra in a subject, a score of 0, -0.5, −1, −1.5, −2, −2.5, and −3 was assigned for no OLVF or OLVF of <20%, ≥ 20–25%, ≥ 2 5%–1/3, ≥ 1/3–40%, ≥ 40%–2/3, and ≥ 2/3 vertebral height loss, respectively. OLVFss was defined as the summed score of vertebrae T4 to L5. OLVFss and T-scores were ranked from the smallest to the largest values.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>OLVFss of −2, −2.5, −3, corresponded to a mean femoral neck T-score of −2.297 (range: -2.355∼-2.247), −2.494 (range: -2.637∼ −2.363), and −2.773 (range: -2.898∼-2.643), a mean hip T-score of-2.311 (range: -2.420∼-2.234), −2.572 (range: -2.708∼-2.432), −2.911 (range: -3.134∼-2.708), a mean lumbar spine T-score of −2.495 (range: -2.656∼-2.403), −2.931 (range: -3.255∼-2.664), and −3.369 (range: -3.525∼-3.258). The Pearson correlation value of OLVFss and T-score of femoral neck, hip and lumbar spine was <em>r</em> = 0.21, 0.26, and 0.22 (all P < 0.0001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>A single severe grade radiological OLVF (≥ 40% height loss) or OLVFss ≤ −2.5 suggest the subject is osteoporotic, and a single collapse grade (≥ 2/3 height loss) OLVF or OLVFss ≤ −3 meets osteoporosis diagnosis criterion. The results highlight the difficulty of diagnosing osteoporotic vertebral fractures among Chinese older men.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19701,"journal":{"name":"Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia","volume":"9 1","pages":"Pages 14-21"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10111950/pdf/main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9385451","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-03-01DOI: 10.1016/j.afos.2023.03.003
Masahiro Tada , Yutaro Yamada , Koji Mandai , Yoshinari Matsumoto , Noriaki Hidaka
Objectives
Behavioral restrictions and staying at home during the COVID-19 pandemic have affected lifestyles. It was hypothesized that patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) decreased their activities of daily living (ADL) and exercise during the pandemic. The aim of this study is to investigate the changes in lifestyle and body composition.
Methods
Data were obtained from an observational study (CHIKARA study). Of 100 RA patients, 70 (57 women, 13 men) were followed-up with measurements of grip strength, as well as muscle mass, fat mass, and basal metabolic rate by a body composition analyzer. Changes in ADL and exercise were evaluated using a visual analog scale. The relationships between changes in ADL or exercise and body composition were investigated.
Results
Muscle mass and grip strength were significantly lower after behavioral restrictions compared to the periods before restrictions (34.0 vs 34.7 kg, P < 0.001; 16.2 vs 17.2 kg, P = 0.013, respectively). Fat mass was significantly greater after behavioral restrictions compared to the periods before restrictions (16.2 vs 15.5 kg, P = 0.014). The mean decrease in ADL was 44%, whereas that of exercise was 20%.
The change in muscle mass (β = −0.335, P = 0.007) was the only independent factor for the change in exercise on multivariate analysis.
Conclusions
Muscle mass and grip strength decreased and fat mass increased in RA patients with the behavioral restrictions of the COVID-19 pandemic. Muscle mass decreased in patients without exercise. Maintenance of muscle mass may be important during the COVID-19 pandemic.
目的新冠肺炎大流行期间的行为限制和呆在家里影响了生活方式。据推测,类风湿性关节炎(RA)患者在疫情期间减少了日常生活活动(ADL)和锻炼。本研究的目的是调查生活方式和身体成分的变化。方法数据来自观察性研究(CHIKARA研究)。在100名RA患者中,70名(57名女性,13名男性)接受了随访,通过身体成分分析仪测量握力、肌肉质量、脂肪质量和基础代谢率。使用视觉模拟量表评估ADL和运动的变化。研究ADL或运动的变化与身体成分之间的关系。结果与行为限制前相比,行为限制后的肌肉质量和握力显著降低(分别为34.0和34.7 kg,P<0.001;16.2和17.2 kg,P=0.013)。与行为限制前相比,行为限制后的脂肪量显著增加(16.2 vs 15.5 kg,P=0.014)。ADL平均下降44%,而运动平均下降20%。多变量分析显示,肌肉量的变化(β=-0.335,P=0.007)是运动变化的唯一独立因素。结论新冠肺炎大流行行为受限的RA患者肌肉量和握力下降,脂肪量增加。没有运动的患者肌肉质量下降。在新冠肺炎大流行期间,维持肌肉质量可能很重要。
{"title":"Lifestyle and body composition changes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis during the COVID-19 pandemic: A retrospective, observational study","authors":"Masahiro Tada , Yutaro Yamada , Koji Mandai , Yoshinari Matsumoto , Noriaki Hidaka","doi":"10.1016/j.afos.2023.03.003","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.afos.2023.03.003","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Behavioral restrictions and staying at home during the COVID-19 pandemic have affected lifestyles. It was hypothesized that patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) decreased their activities of daily living (ADL) and exercise during the pandemic. The aim of this study is to investigate the changes in lifestyle and body composition.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Data were obtained from an observational study (CHIKARA study). Of 100 RA patients, 70 (57 women, 13 men) were followed-up with measurements of grip strength, as well as muscle mass, fat mass, and basal metabolic rate by a body composition analyzer. Changes in ADL and exercise were evaluated using a visual analog scale. The relationships between changes in ADL or exercise and body composition were investigated.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Muscle mass and grip strength were significantly lower after behavioral restrictions compared to the periods before restrictions (34.0 vs 34.7 kg, P < 0.001; 16.2 vs 17.2 kg, P = 0.013, respectively). Fat mass was significantly greater after behavioral restrictions compared to the periods before restrictions (16.2 vs 15.5 kg, P = 0.014). The mean decrease in ADL was 44%, whereas that of exercise was 20%.</p><p>The change in muscle mass (<em>β</em> = −0.335, P = 0.007) was the only independent factor for the change in exercise on multivariate analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Muscle mass and grip strength decreased and fat mass increased in RA patients with the behavioral restrictions of the COVID-19 pandemic. Muscle mass decreased in patients without exercise. Maintenance of muscle mass may be important during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19701,"journal":{"name":"Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia","volume":"9 1","pages":"Pages 32-37"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10034844/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9664898","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The objective of this study is to assess outcomes and patient's mortality of Police General Hospital's fracture liaison service (PGH's FLS) during Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak comparing to the former period.
Methods
Retrospective cohort study was performed in patients aged 50 or older who were admitted with fragility hip fracture in Police General Hospital, Bangkok, between January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2019 (before pandemic) comparing to January 1, 2020 to December 31, 2021 (pandemic) using the electronic database. The outcomes were mortality and other outcomes in one-year follow up.
Results
A total of 139 fragility hip fractures were recorded in 2018–2019 (before pandemic) compared with 125 in 2020–2021 (pandemic). The 30-day mortality in hip fracture numerically increased from 0% to 2.4% during the pandemic. One-year mortality was significantly escalated from 2 cases (1.4%) to 5 cases (4%) (P = 0.033). However, the cause of mortality was not related with COVID-19 infection. We also found a significantly shorter time to surgery but longer wait time for bone mineral density (BMD) testing and initiation of osteoporosis medication in pandemic period.
Conclusions
The results of this study in COVID-19 pandemic period, 1-year mortality rate was significantly higher but they were not related with COVID-19 infection. We also found longer time to initial BMD testing and anti-osteoporotic medication and more loss of follow up, causing lower anti-osteoporotic medication taking. In contrast, the time to surgery became shorter during the pandemic.
{"title":"Mortality and outcome in fragility hip fracture care during COVID-19 pandemic in Police General Hospital, Thailand","authors":"Nitirat Stitkitti, Tanawat Amphansap, Atiporn Therdyothin","doi":"10.1016/j.afos.2023.03.001","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.afos.2023.03.001","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The objective of this study is to assess outcomes and patient's mortality of Police General Hospital's fracture liaison service (PGH's FLS) during Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak comparing to the former period.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Retrospective cohort study was performed in patients aged 50 or older who were admitted with fragility hip fracture in Police General Hospital, Bangkok, between January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2019 (before pandemic) comparing to January 1, 2020 to December 31, 2021 (pandemic) using the electronic database. The outcomes were mortality and other outcomes in one-year follow up.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><em>A</em> total of 139 fragility hip fractures were recorded in 2018–2019 (before pandemic) compared with 125 in 2020–2021 (pandemic). The 30-day mortality in hip fracture numerically increased from 0% to 2.4% during the pandemic. One-year mortality was significantly escalated from 2 cases (1.4%) to 5 cases (4%) (P = 0.033). However, the cause of mortality was not related with COVID-19 infection. We also found a significantly shorter time to surgery but longer wait time for bone mineral density (BMD) testing and initiation of osteoporosis medication in pandemic period.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The results of this study in COVID-19 pandemic period, 1-year mortality rate was significantly higher but they were not related with COVID-19 infection. We also found longer time to initial BMD testing and anti-osteoporotic medication and more loss of follow up, causing lower anti-osteoporotic medication taking. In contrast, the time to surgery became shorter during the pandemic.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19701,"journal":{"name":"Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia","volume":"9 1","pages":"Pages 22-26"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10034845/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9664407","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}