Pub Date : 2026-02-17eCollection Date: 2026-02-01DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000007477
Abdulaziz Alabdulkarim, Lamees A Altamimi, Alwalid M Alharbi, Shatha M Aldor, Abdullh Z AlQhtani
Background: Age-related changes in the brow region, such as sagging, asymmetry, and deepening of forehead lines, pose significant cosmetic and functional challenges. Various surgical approaches have been developed over the decades to address these issues. This systematic review compared traditional open techniques versus endoscopic and minimally invasive brow lift techniques in terms of aesthetic outcomes and complication rates.
Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Studies published during the past 20 years that met our predefined eligibility criteria were included. The quality of randomized controlled trials was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool, and nonrandomized studies were evaluated with risk of bias in non-randomized studies of interventions (ROBINS-I). Data on aesthetic outcomes and complications were extracted and compared across studies.
Results: Fifteen studies were included in this review. The evidence suggests that although various open brow lift techniques provide satisfactory elevation, they are generally associated with higher complication rates and less favorable cosmetic results. In contrast, endoscopic and minimally invasive techniques, including the use of Endotine devices and gliding brow lifts, demonstrate comparable or superior aesthetic outcomes with lower complication rates and reduced recovery times. However, heterogeneity in outcome measures and study designs limits the strength of these conclusions.
Conclusions: Endoscopic and minimally invasive brow lift procedures seem to offer cosmetically favorable results with lower complication rates compared with traditional open techniques. Nevertheless, further high-quality, prospective studies are needed to definitively establish the long-term efficacy and safety of these approaches.
背景:与年龄相关的额头区域变化,如下垂、不对称和前额皱纹加深,对美容和功能构成重大挑战。为了解决这些问题,几十年来已经发展出了各种手术方法。本系统综述比较了传统开放技术与内窥镜和微创提眉技术在美学效果和并发症发生率方面的差异。方法:综合检索PubMed、MEDLINE、Cochrane图书馆、Embase和ClinicalTrials.gov。在过去20年中发表的符合我们预先设定的资格标准的研究被纳入。随机对照试验的质量采用Cochrane Risk of Bias 2工具进行评估,非随机研究采用干预措施的非随机研究(ROBINS-I)的偏倚风险进行评估。提取并比较各研究的美学结果和并发症的数据。结果:本综述纳入了15项研究。有证据表明,尽管各种开放式提眉技术提供了令人满意的提升,但它们通常与较高的并发症发生率和较差的美容效果相关。相比之下,内窥镜和微创技术,包括使用Endotine装置和滑动提眉术,显示出相当或更好的美学效果,并发症发生率更低,恢复时间更短。然而,结果测量和研究设计的异质性限制了这些结论的强度。结论:与传统的开放技术相比,内镜和微创提眉术似乎提供了良好的美容效果,并发症发生率较低。然而,需要进一步的高质量前瞻性研究来确定这些方法的长期有效性和安全性。
{"title":"Comparative Outcomes of Traditional Versus Endoscopic Brow Lift Techniques: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Abdulaziz Alabdulkarim, Lamees A Altamimi, Alwalid M Alharbi, Shatha M Aldor, Abdullh Z AlQhtani","doi":"10.1097/GOX.0000000000007477","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000007477","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Age-related changes in the brow region, such as sagging, asymmetry, and deepening of forehead lines, pose significant cosmetic and functional challenges. Various surgical approaches have been developed over the decades to address these issues. This systematic review compared traditional open techniques versus endoscopic and minimally invasive brow lift techniques in terms of aesthetic outcomes and complication rates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Studies published during the past 20 years that met our predefined eligibility criteria were included. The quality of randomized controlled trials was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool, and nonrandomized studies were evaluated with risk of bias in non-randomized studies of interventions (ROBINS-I). Data on aesthetic outcomes and complications were extracted and compared across studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen studies were included in this review. The evidence suggests that although various open brow lift techniques provide satisfactory elevation, they are generally associated with higher complication rates and less favorable cosmetic results. In contrast, endoscopic and minimally invasive techniques, including the use of Endotine devices and gliding brow lifts, demonstrate comparable or superior aesthetic outcomes with lower complication rates and reduced recovery times. However, heterogeneity in outcome measures and study designs limits the strength of these conclusions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Endoscopic and minimally invasive brow lift procedures seem to offer cosmetically favorable results with lower complication rates compared with traditional open techniques. Nevertheless, further high-quality, prospective studies are needed to definitively establish the long-term efficacy and safety of these approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":20149,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","volume":"14 2","pages":"e7477"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12911988/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146219626","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-17eCollection Date: 2026-02-01DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000007512
Wessam Samir Wahdan, Khaled Audi, Mahmoud S Elbasiouny, Abdelhay A Alsayed, Hossam Eldin Tahseen
Background: Traditional surgical treatment for gynecomastia has multiple complications. Recently, energy-based therapies have gained popularity over conventional surgical treatments, including liposuction using radiofrequency energy, power-assisted liposuction, ultrasound-assisted liposuction, and laser-assisted lipolysis (LAL). This work aims to assess LAL efficacy and glandular tissue treatment using a 1470-nm laser for gynecomastia to correct breast volume, flaccidity, and skin tightening without its removal.
Methods: This prospective, single-blinded randomized controlled trial was conducted on 30 patients enrolled in the National Institute of Laser Enhanced Sciences outpatient clinic who had gynecomastia classified according to the Simon standard. The participants were randomly allocated to 2 groups: group 1 (n = 15) received conventional liposuction (suction-assisted liposuction), and group 2 received LAL (1470-nm diode laser) treatment. Patients were assessed using the BREAST-Q scale.
Results: All patients achieved satisfactory results. The BREAST-Q scores were significantly higher in group 2 compared with group I (P < 0.005). Visual analog scale scores significantly decreased in group 2 (P < 0.001) compared with group 1. Group 2 had significantly improved aesthetic outcomes compared with group 1 (P < 0.001). In group 1, skin retraction and hematoma incidence were significantly greater than in group 2 (P = 0.014, <0.001).
Conclusions: The LAL described is safe and reproducible. It showed a higher BREAST-Q value, a significantly better aesthetic outcome, and fewer postoperative complications.
{"title":"Evaluation of Aesthetic Outcomes After Laser-assisted Liposuction for Gynecomastia.","authors":"Wessam Samir Wahdan, Khaled Audi, Mahmoud S Elbasiouny, Abdelhay A Alsayed, Hossam Eldin Tahseen","doi":"10.1097/GOX.0000000000007512","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000007512","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Traditional surgical treatment for gynecomastia has multiple complications. Recently, energy-based therapies have gained popularity over conventional surgical treatments, including liposuction using radiofrequency energy, power-assisted liposuction, ultrasound-assisted liposuction, and laser-assisted lipolysis (LAL). This work aims to assess LAL efficacy and glandular tissue treatment using a 1470-nm laser for gynecomastia to correct breast volume, flaccidity, and skin tightening without its removal.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective, single-blinded randomized controlled trial was conducted on 30 patients enrolled in the National Institute of Laser Enhanced Sciences outpatient clinic who had gynecomastia classified according to the Simon standard. The participants were randomly allocated to 2 groups: group 1 (n = 15) received conventional liposuction (suction-assisted liposuction), and group 2 received LAL (1470-nm diode laser) treatment. Patients were assessed using the BREAST-Q scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All patients achieved satisfactory results. The BREAST-Q scores were significantly higher in group 2 compared with group I (<i>P</i> < 0.005). Visual analog scale scores significantly decreased in group 2 (<i>P</i> < 0.001) compared with group 1. Group 2 had significantly improved aesthetic outcomes compared with group 1 (<i>P</i> < 0.001). In group 1, skin retraction and hematoma incidence were significantly greater than in group 2 (<i>P</i> = 0.014, <0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The LAL described is safe and reproducible. It showed a higher BREAST-Q value, a significantly better aesthetic outcome, and fewer postoperative complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":20149,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","volume":"14 2","pages":"e7512"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12912043/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146220445","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-17eCollection Date: 2026-02-01DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000007473
Natalia Correa, Georges Tahhan, Jessica Gonzalez, Lynell Martinez, Eric Weiss
Sternal wound infections are a serious complication after cardiac surgery and are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Deep sternal wound infections are characterized by positive mediastinal cultures, clinical signs of mediastinitis, and symptoms such as fever, sternal instability, or purulent drainage. Management includes serial debridement, negative pressure wound therapy, and definitive reconstruction. We present a 70-year-old man with a history of aortic and mitral valve disease, diabetes, chronic kidney disease, and bladder cancer who underwent prosthetic aortic graft reconstruction (Bentall procedure). Postoperatively, he developed mediastinitis requiring multiple washouts and wound vacuum-assisted closure therapy. For reconstruction, a split omental flap pedicled on the right gastroepiploic artery was mobilized, with 1 segment covering the aortic graft and the other the lower sternum. SPY angiography was used to determine the site of division. Sternal closure was performed with wires. Bilateral pectoralis major flaps were advanced medially to complete upper third sternal coverage. This case demonstrates the feasibility of a combined split omental and bilateral pectoralis flap reconstruction for complex deep sternal wound infection, providing layered, vascularized coverage over grafts and bone. This report underscored the viability and utility of a multisegmental omental flap in combination with pectoralis flaps for deep and superficial sternal wounds following cardiothoracic surgery.
{"title":"Multisegmental Omental and Pectoralis Flaps for Sternal Wound Reconstruction.","authors":"Natalia Correa, Georges Tahhan, Jessica Gonzalez, Lynell Martinez, Eric Weiss","doi":"10.1097/GOX.0000000000007473","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000007473","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sternal wound infections are a serious complication after cardiac surgery and are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Deep sternal wound infections are characterized by positive mediastinal cultures, clinical signs of mediastinitis, and symptoms such as fever, sternal instability, or purulent drainage. Management includes serial debridement, negative pressure wound therapy, and definitive reconstruction. We present a 70-year-old man with a history of aortic and mitral valve disease, diabetes, chronic kidney disease, and bladder cancer who underwent prosthetic aortic graft reconstruction (Bentall procedure). Postoperatively, he developed mediastinitis requiring multiple washouts and wound vacuum-assisted closure therapy. For reconstruction, a split omental flap pedicled on the right gastroepiploic artery was mobilized, with 1 segment covering the aortic graft and the other the lower sternum. SPY angiography was used to determine the site of division. Sternal closure was performed with wires. Bilateral pectoralis major flaps were advanced medially to complete upper third sternal coverage. This case demonstrates the feasibility of a combined split omental and bilateral pectoralis flap reconstruction for complex deep sternal wound infection, providing layered, vascularized coverage over grafts and bone. This report underscored the viability and utility of a multisegmental omental flap in combination with pectoralis flaps for deep and superficial sternal wounds following cardiothoracic surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":20149,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","volume":"14 2","pages":"e7473"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12912063/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146220450","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-17eCollection Date: 2026-02-01DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000007507
David B Lipps, Brigit D Baglien, Michael N Saunders, Jacob Vidergar, Gabriela L Maica, Paige L Myers, Mousumi Banerjee, Adeyiza O Momoh
Background: Prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction may enhance aesthetic results and improve functional outcomes. Although currently favored over other approaches, the use of acellular dermal matrices may lead to higher healthcare costs compared with the subpectoral approaches. Prior research on the cost implications often lacks comprehensive analyses of cumulative perioperative medical expenses.
Methods: This retrospective cohort study analyzed data from women who underwent unilateral or bilateral mastectomy followed by immediate implant-based reconstruction at a single academic center between July 2017 and June 2022. We used financial data to examine billing charges from the index surgery and the downstream costs of patient care up to 6 months postoperation. Regression analyses assessed total index surgery costs, downstream costs, and cumulative costs while adjusting for variables such as age, body mass index, and racial demographics.
Results: The study analyzed data from 86 prepectoral and 99 subpectoral reconstruction patients. Subpectoral reconstructions had significantly lower index surgery costs, including a 30.5% decrease in costs compared with prepectoral reconstruction (P < 0.001). Although downstream costs up to 6 months postsurgery did not significantly differ, cumulative costs were 29.2% lower in subpectoral cases (P < 0.001). The increased use of acellular dermal matrix in prepectoral procedures contributed to higher costs.
Conclusions: Prepectoral implant-based reconstruction is associated with significantly higher surgical and cumulative costs compared with subpectoral reconstruction. These results provide critical cost-related insights as prepectoral techniques gain traction. Addressing these cost variables could facilitate broader implementation of prepectoral procedures, leveraging their potential patient-centered benefits.
{"title":"Cumulative Medical Costs of Prepectoral Versus Subpectoral Implant-based Breast Reconstruction: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis.","authors":"David B Lipps, Brigit D Baglien, Michael N Saunders, Jacob Vidergar, Gabriela L Maica, Paige L Myers, Mousumi Banerjee, Adeyiza O Momoh","doi":"10.1097/GOX.0000000000007507","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000007507","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction may enhance aesthetic results and improve functional outcomes. Although currently favored over other approaches, the use of acellular dermal matrices may lead to higher healthcare costs compared with the subpectoral approaches. Prior research on the cost implications often lacks comprehensive analyses of cumulative perioperative medical expenses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study analyzed data from women who underwent unilateral or bilateral mastectomy followed by immediate implant-based reconstruction at a single academic center between July 2017 and June 2022. We used financial data to examine billing charges from the index surgery and the downstream costs of patient care up to 6 months postoperation. Regression analyses assessed total index surgery costs, downstream costs, and cumulative costs while adjusting for variables such as age, body mass index, and racial demographics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study analyzed data from 86 prepectoral and 99 subpectoral reconstruction patients. Subpectoral reconstructions had significantly lower index surgery costs, including a 30.5% decrease in costs compared with prepectoral reconstruction (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Although downstream costs up to 6 months postsurgery did not significantly differ, cumulative costs were 29.2% lower in subpectoral cases (<i>P</i> < 0.001). The increased use of acellular dermal matrix in prepectoral procedures contributed to higher costs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Prepectoral implant-based reconstruction is associated with significantly higher surgical and cumulative costs compared with subpectoral reconstruction. These results provide critical cost-related insights as prepectoral techniques gain traction. Addressing these cost variables could facilitate broader implementation of prepectoral procedures, leveraging their potential patient-centered benefits.</p>","PeriodicalId":20149,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","volume":"14 2","pages":"e7507"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12912080/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146220457","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
With the rising popularity of hyaluronic acid (HA) fillers for cosmetic purposes, complications such as delayed-onset edema and nodules have become more frequent. These adverse reactions may be challenging to treat and often require multiple therapeutic strategies. We report 3 cases of women who developed late-onset edema and firm nodules following HA filler procedures. Conventional treatments, including corticosteroids, antibiotics, and hyaluronidase, were insufficient. Oral methotrexate at 15 mg per week was introduced, resulting in complete resolution in all cases within approximately 30 days. Low-dose methotrexate proved to be effective in managing persistent nodules and edema secondary to HA fillers. Methotrexate may represent a promising treatment option for delayed inflammatory responses following HA filler injections. Further prospective studies are needed to validate its safety and efficacy in this context.
{"title":"Effective Management of Late Inflammatory Nodules Following Hyaluronic Acid Fillers: A Case Series Treated With Methotrexate.","authors":"Lígia Piccinini Colucii, Juliana Botelho Carvalho, Isadora Raisa Pimenta Magalhães, Letícia Oba Galvão","doi":"10.1097/GOX.0000000000007314","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000007314","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>With the rising popularity of hyaluronic acid (HA) fillers for cosmetic purposes, complications such as delayed-onset edema and nodules have become more frequent. These adverse reactions may be challenging to treat and often require multiple therapeutic strategies. We report 3 cases of women who developed late-onset edema and firm nodules following HA filler procedures. Conventional treatments, including corticosteroids, antibiotics, and hyaluronidase, were insufficient. Oral methotrexate at 15 mg per week was introduced, resulting in complete resolution in all cases within approximately 30 days. Low-dose methotrexate proved to be effective in managing persistent nodules and edema secondary to HA fillers. Methotrexate may represent a promising treatment option for delayed inflammatory responses following HA filler injections. Further prospective studies are needed to validate its safety and efficacy in this context.</p>","PeriodicalId":20149,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","volume":"14 2","pages":"e7314"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12908804/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146213633","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-13eCollection Date: 2026-02-01DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000007347
Abdulaziz Hamad Alnufaei, Faisal Khalid AlSubaie, Raghad Abdulaziz Aljabri, Shahad Zaid Aloqayli, Sultan Alanshmi, Shaykhah Muteb Alotaibi, Zyinaab Bassam Ajeeb, Leen Yasser AlGhamdi, Mohammed Essam Kattan, Bushra Hatim Alahmadi, Abdulaziz K Alhujayri
Background: Effective perioperative analgesia and control of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) are key determinants of recovery after otoplasty for prominent ear deformity, yet comparative evidence for current techniques is limited.
Methods: A PROSPERO-registered systematic review (CRD42024586119) was performed in September 2024 following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. PubMed, Google Scholar, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched (1989-2020) for English-language randomized or prospective studies reporting pain outcomes after otoplasty. Nine studies (6 randomized controlled trials and 3 cohort studies; 370 patients) met eligibility criteria. Two reviewers extracted pain scores, opioid use, PONV, and complications; risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2 and methodological index for non-randomized studies.
Results: Regional nerve block provided superior analgesia versus local infiltration anesthesia with a mean pain score at 6 hours of 0.25 versus 2.34 (P < 0.001) and opioid requirements of 14% versus 24%. Propofol anesthesia and transdermal hyoscine patches reduced PONV to 16% versus 48% with placebo. Reported adverse events were infrequent (<5%) and transient (eg, Horner syndrome, mild bradycardia, hoarseness). Overall methodological quality was moderate, and heterogeneity precluded meta-analysis.
Conclusions: Regional nerve block is the most effective strategy for perioperative pain control in otoplasty, halving opioid use and improving early pain scores. Adjunctive propofol and hyoscine further reduce PONV, with no serious or lasting complications. Standardized multimodal protocols and high-quality trials-especially in pediatric and awake procedures-are required to strengthen evidence and broaden applicability.
背景:有效的围术期镇痛和术后恶心呕吐(PONV)的控制是耳廓畸形成形术后恢复的关键决定因素,但目前技术的比较证据有限。方法:根据系统评价和meta分析指南的首选报告项目,于2024年9月进行普洛斯佩罗注册的系统评价(CRD42024586119)。我们检索了PubMed、b谷歌Scholar、Web of Science和Cochrane Library(1989-2020),以获取报告耳成形术后疼痛结果的英语随机或前瞻性研究。9项研究(6项随机对照试验和3项队列研究,共370例患者)符合入选标准。两位评论者提取了疼痛评分、阿片类药物使用、PONV和并发症;采用rob2和非随机研究的方法学指数评估偏倚风险。结果:与局部浸润麻醉相比,区域神经阻滞提供了更好的镇痛效果,6小时平均疼痛评分为0.25比2.34 (P < 0.001),阿片类药物需要量为14%比24%。异丙酚麻醉和透皮海莨菪碱贴片将PONV降低至16%,而安慰剂组为48%。报告的不良事件很少发生(结论:局部神经阻滞是耳成形术围手术期疼痛控制的最有效策略,可将阿片类药物的使用减半并改善早期疼痛评分。辅助异丙酚和海辛碱进一步降低了PONV,没有严重或持久的并发症。需要标准化的多模式协议和高质量的试验,特别是在儿科和清醒手术中,以加强证据和扩大适用性。
{"title":"Perioperative Analgesia and Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting Management in Otoplasty: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Abdulaziz Hamad Alnufaei, Faisal Khalid AlSubaie, Raghad Abdulaziz Aljabri, Shahad Zaid Aloqayli, Sultan Alanshmi, Shaykhah Muteb Alotaibi, Zyinaab Bassam Ajeeb, Leen Yasser AlGhamdi, Mohammed Essam Kattan, Bushra Hatim Alahmadi, Abdulaziz K Alhujayri","doi":"10.1097/GOX.0000000000007347","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000007347","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Effective perioperative analgesia and control of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) are key determinants of recovery after otoplasty for prominent ear deformity, yet comparative evidence for current techniques is limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A PROSPERO-registered systematic review (CRD42024586119) was performed in September 2024 following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. PubMed, Google Scholar, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched (1989-2020) for English-language randomized or prospective studies reporting pain outcomes after otoplasty. Nine studies (6 randomized controlled trials and 3 cohort studies; 370 patients) met eligibility criteria. Two reviewers extracted pain scores, opioid use, PONV, and complications; risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2 and methodological index for non-randomized studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Regional nerve block provided superior analgesia versus local infiltration anesthesia with a mean pain score at 6 hours of 0.25 versus 2.34 (<i>P</i> < 0.001) and opioid requirements of 14% versus 24%. Propofol anesthesia and transdermal hyoscine patches reduced PONV to 16% versus 48% with placebo. Reported adverse events were infrequent (<5%) and transient (eg, Horner syndrome, mild bradycardia, hoarseness). Overall methodological quality was moderate, and heterogeneity precluded meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Regional nerve block is the most effective strategy for perioperative pain control in otoplasty, halving opioid use and improving early pain scores. Adjunctive propofol and hyoscine further reduce PONV, with no serious or lasting complications. Standardized multimodal protocols and high-quality trials-especially in pediatric and awake procedures-are required to strengthen evidence and broaden applicability.</p>","PeriodicalId":20149,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","volume":"14 2","pages":"e7347"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12908817/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146213859","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-13eCollection Date: 2026-02-01DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000007496
Lachlan R Yaksich, Theo F Birch
The pectoralis major flap is a reliable option in head, neck, and chest wall reconstruction; however, postoperative myospasm is a source of significant morbidity. The pathophysiological mechanism remains unclear, with proposed causes including incomplete nerve division or anatomical variation. We present 2 cases of patients who developed symptomatic myospasm following pectoralis major flap reconstruction, despite division of the medial and lateral pectoral nerves during the primary procedure. In both cases, aberrant motor nerves were identified intraoperatively running alongside the thoracoacromial pedicle. Stimulation of these nerves reproduced patient symptoms, and targeted neurectomy led to symptom resolution or significant improvement. These findings suggested that alternative motor innervation may underlie persistent myospasm in some patients. This was the first report to document the direct intraoperative identification and treatment of aberrant innervation as a contributing factor. Further anatomical studies are warranted to explore the prevalence, origin, and clinical significance of this variation.
{"title":"Aberrant Innervation of the Pectoralis Major Flap Resulting in Myospasm.","authors":"Lachlan R Yaksich, Theo F Birch","doi":"10.1097/GOX.0000000000007496","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000007496","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The pectoralis major flap is a reliable option in head, neck, and chest wall reconstruction; however, postoperative myospasm is a source of significant morbidity. The pathophysiological mechanism remains unclear, with proposed causes including incomplete nerve division or anatomical variation. We present 2 cases of patients who developed symptomatic myospasm following pectoralis major flap reconstruction, despite division of the medial and lateral pectoral nerves during the primary procedure. In both cases, aberrant motor nerves were identified intraoperatively running alongside the thoracoacromial pedicle. Stimulation of these nerves reproduced patient symptoms, and targeted neurectomy led to symptom resolution or significant improvement. These findings suggested that alternative motor innervation may underlie persistent myospasm in some patients. This was the first report to document the direct intraoperative identification and treatment of aberrant innervation as a contributing factor. Further anatomical studies are warranted to explore the prevalence, origin, and clinical significance of this variation.</p>","PeriodicalId":20149,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","volume":"14 2","pages":"e7496"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12908738/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146213648","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Bilateral autologous breast reconstruction requires microsurgery on both sides, increasing operative time and surgeon workload compared with unilateral reconstruction. This study examines the efficacy of a simultaneous microsurgical approach for bilateral breast reconstruction in reducing operative time and burden. A total of 22 patients who underwent bilateral breast reconstruction with deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flaps at the University of Toyama Hospital from March 2020 to December 2023 were included. These comprised 2 groups of patients who underwent either conventional sequential reconstruction or simultaneous reconstruction. In the conventional group, 1 flap was transected, and vascular anastomosis was completed before proceeding to the second flap. Abdominal closure was started after the transection of the second flap. In the simultaneous group, both flaps were transected at approximately the same time, and 2 surgeons performed the microsurgery simultaneously using separate microscopes. Abdominal closure began after both flaps were transected. Our results showed significantly shorter operative time (538 versus 657 min, P = 0.04) and ischemia time (92 versus 177 min, P = 0.006) in the simultaneous group than the conventional group, respectively. No postoperative complications requiring reoperation occurred in the simultaneous group. In the conventional group, there was 1 case of flap loss due to postoperative infection. This study demonstrates that the bilateral simultaneous approach reduced operative and ischemia times while maintaining safety. Despite requiring 2 skilled microsurgeons, this approach offered an efficient and reliable solution for bilateral reconstruction.
双侧自体乳房再造术需要双侧显微手术,与单侧乳房再造术相比,增加了手术时间和手术工作量。本研究探讨了同时显微外科入路在减少手术时间和负担方面的双侧乳房重建的疗效。本研究纳入了2020年3月至2023年12月在富山大学医院接受腹部深下动脉穿支皮瓣双侧乳房重建的22例患者。这些患者分为两组,接受常规顺序重建或同时重建。常规组先切除1个皮瓣,完成血管吻合后再移植2个皮瓣。在第二皮瓣横断后开始腹部闭合。在同时组中,两个皮瓣几乎同时横切,2名外科医生使用单独的显微镜同时进行显微手术。切除两个皮瓣后开始腹部闭合。结果显示,同期组的手术时间(538 min比657 min, P = 0.04)和缺血时间(92 min比177 min, P = 0.006)均明显短于常规组。同期组无术后需再手术并发症发生。常规组因术后感染导致皮瓣丢失1例。本研究表明双侧同时入路在保证安全性的同时减少了手术时间和缺血时间。尽管需要2名熟练的显微外科医生,但该方法为双侧重建提供了高效可靠的解决方案。
{"title":"Simultaneous Bilateral Microsurgery in Autologous Tissue Breast Reconstruction.","authors":"Gaku Tachibana, Toshihiko Satake, Minami Noto, Tomoka Kitahara, Kyona Taki, Kahori Tsukura, Ryohei Katsuragi, Fumio Nagai, Satoshi Onoda","doi":"10.1097/GOX.0000000000007469","DOIUrl":"10.1097/GOX.0000000000007469","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Bilateral autologous breast reconstruction requires microsurgery on both sides, increasing operative time and surgeon workload compared with unilateral reconstruction. This study examines the efficacy of a simultaneous microsurgical approach for bilateral breast reconstruction in reducing operative time and burden. A total of 22 patients who underwent bilateral breast reconstruction with deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flaps at the University of Toyama Hospital from March 2020 to December 2023 were included. These comprised 2 groups of patients who underwent either conventional sequential reconstruction or simultaneous reconstruction. In the conventional group, 1 flap was transected, and vascular anastomosis was completed before proceeding to the second flap. Abdominal closure was started after the transection of the second flap. In the simultaneous group, both flaps were transected at approximately the same time, and 2 surgeons performed the microsurgery simultaneously using separate microscopes. Abdominal closure began after both flaps were transected. Our results showed significantly shorter operative time (538 versus 657 min, <i>P</i> = 0.04) and ischemia time (92 versus 177 min, <i>P</i> = 0.006) in the simultaneous group than the conventional group, respectively. No postoperative complications requiring reoperation occurred in the simultaneous group. In the conventional group, there was 1 case of flap loss due to postoperative infection. This study demonstrates that the bilateral simultaneous approach reduced operative and ischemia times while maintaining safety. Despite requiring 2 skilled microsurgeons, this approach offered an efficient and reliable solution for bilateral reconstruction.</p>","PeriodicalId":20149,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","volume":"14 2","pages":"e7469"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12893415/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146181786","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-11eCollection Date: 2026-02-01DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000007476
Maysaa A Alghamdi, Jullanar S Alkhunein, Feryal K Alali, Zaid A Dajani, Abdulgader K Basamad, Rabab A Alkhalaf, Fatima A Alghamdi, Abdullah K Almarri, Zahir T Fadel
Background: Pathological scars, particularly hypertrophic and keloid types, often pose significant cosmetic and functional challenges. Although fractional CO₂ lasers and pulsed dye lasers have individually shown promise in scar treatment, their combined efficacy remains underexplored.
Methods: Following preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines and registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024619973), a comprehensive search across 6 databases identified studies involving patients treated with combined fractional CO₂ laser and pulsed dye laser for scars of various etiologies. Inclusion criteria focused on clinical outcomes such as scar thickness, vascularity, pliability, and pigmentation, assessed via validated tools such as the Vancouver Scar Scale, Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale, and Observer Scar Assessment Scale. Nine studies, involving a total of 247 patients, were included. Meta-analyses were performed using a random-effects model.
Results: The combination therapy significantly improved scar appearance across multiple scales. The pooled mean differences were -18.09 for the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale, -19.44 for the Observer Scar Assessment Scale, and -3.80 for the Vancouver Scar Scale, all of which were statistically significant (P < 0.0001). Improvements were consistent across pigmentation, vascularity, texture, and patient satisfaction, with minimal adverse effects reported. Heterogeneity was high, but it did not impact the direction of the findings.
Conclusions: Combining fractional CO₂ and pulsed dye lasers offers superior outcomes in scar remodeling compared with monotherapy, improving both functional and aesthetic aspects with a favorable safety profile. Future studies should focus on standardizing treatment protocols and exploring long-term outcomes to optimize clinical use.
{"title":"Combined Fractional CO<sub>₂</sub> and Pulsed Dye Laser Therapy for Scar Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Maysaa A Alghamdi, Jullanar S Alkhunein, Feryal K Alali, Zaid A Dajani, Abdulgader K Basamad, Rabab A Alkhalaf, Fatima A Alghamdi, Abdullah K Almarri, Zahir T Fadel","doi":"10.1097/GOX.0000000000007476","DOIUrl":"10.1097/GOX.0000000000007476","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pathological scars, particularly hypertrophic and keloid types, often pose significant cosmetic and functional challenges. Although fractional CO₂ lasers and pulsed dye lasers have individually shown promise in scar treatment, their combined efficacy remains underexplored.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines and registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024619973), a comprehensive search across 6 databases identified studies involving patients treated with combined fractional CO₂ laser and pulsed dye laser for scars of various etiologies. Inclusion criteria focused on clinical outcomes such as scar thickness, vascularity, pliability, and pigmentation, assessed via validated tools such as the Vancouver Scar Scale, Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale, and Observer Scar Assessment Scale. Nine studies, involving a total of 247 patients, were included. Meta-analyses were performed using a random-effects model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The combination therapy significantly improved scar appearance across multiple scales. The pooled mean differences were -18.09 for the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale, -19.44 for the Observer Scar Assessment Scale, and -3.80 for the Vancouver Scar Scale, all of which were statistically significant (<i>P</i> < 0.0001). Improvements were consistent across pigmentation, vascularity, texture, and patient satisfaction, with minimal adverse effects reported. Heterogeneity was high, but it did not impact the direction of the findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Combining fractional CO₂ and pulsed dye lasers offers superior outcomes in scar remodeling compared with monotherapy, improving both functional and aesthetic aspects with a favorable safety profile. Future studies should focus on standardizing treatment protocols and exploring long-term outcomes to optimize clinical use.</p>","PeriodicalId":20149,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","volume":"14 2","pages":"e7476"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12893417/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146181823","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-10eCollection Date: 2026-02-01DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000007456
Julián Hernández, Natalia Ruiz, Brian Ramírez, Agustina Varela
Background: The Keller Funnel facilitates breast implant placement while minimizing contamination and capsular contracture risk. Antiseptic agents are commonly used as lubricants, but they may carry adverse effects. This study evaluated outcomes of funnel-assisted insertion lubricated with hyaluronic acid compared with manual insertion.
Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 200 patients undergoing primary breast augmentation (2022-2024). Data were collected from the records of 100 patients who received manual implant insertion and 100 patients who underwent implant placement using the funnel technique. Demographics, surgical variables, scar size, insertion time, complications, and patient satisfaction (BODY-Q) were analyzed. Statistical significance was set at a P value of less than 0.05.
Results: Mean patient age was 25.3 years, body mass index was 21.8 kg/m2, and implant volume was 330 mL. Scar size was smaller in the funnel group (32 versus 37 mm, P = 0.025). Insertion time was shorter (5.9 versus 57.6 s, P = 0.001). Complications occurred in 1% of funnel cases versus 8% of manual cases (odds ratio: 0.11; 95% confidence interval: 0.01-0.94; P = 0.04). Satisfaction improved significantly postoperatively in both groups (preoperative 54.3 versus 92.6 at 6 mo, P < 0.001) with no between-group difference (P = 0.712).
Conclusions: Funnel insertion with hyaluronic acid reduced scar size, insertion time, and complication risk compared with manual insertion, while achieving high and comparable satisfaction. This technique offers a safe "no-touch" alternative that may lower contamination and capsular contracture risk. Prospective studies are needed to validate long-term efficacy and to compare hyaluronic acid with antiseptic additives.
背景:凯勒漏斗有助于乳房植入,同时最大限度地减少污染和包膜挛缩的风险。防腐剂通常用作润滑剂,但它们可能会产生不利影响。本研究评估了透明质酸润滑的管道辅助插入与手动插入的效果。方法:回顾性队列研究200例(2022-2024)隆胸患者。数据收集自100例采用手工种植体置入和100例采用漏斗技术种植体置入的患者的记录。分析了人口统计学、手术变量、疤痕大小、插入时间、并发症和患者满意度(BODY-Q)。P值< 0.05,差异有统计学意义。结果:患者平均年龄25.3岁,体重指数21.8 kg/m2,种植体体积330 mL,漏斗组瘢痕尺寸较小(32 vs 37 mm, P = 0.025)。插入时间较短(5.9 vs . 57.6 s, P = 0.001)。漏斗病例的并发症发生率为1%,手工病例为8%(优势比:0.11;95%可信区间:0.01-0.94;P = 0.04)。两组患者术后满意度均显著提高(术前54.3 vs 6月92.6,P < 0.001),组间无差异(P = 0.712)。结论:与手工置入相比,透明质酸漏斗置入减少了疤痕大小、置入时间和并发症风险,同时获得了较高的满意度。这项技术提供了一种安全的“无接触”替代方法,可以降低污染和包膜挛缩的风险。需要前瞻性研究来验证长期疗效,并比较透明质酸与防腐剂添加剂。
{"title":"Experience Using the Funnel Insertion Method Lubricated With Hyaluronic Acid for Breast Implantation.","authors":"Julián Hernández, Natalia Ruiz, Brian Ramírez, Agustina Varela","doi":"10.1097/GOX.0000000000007456","DOIUrl":"10.1097/GOX.0000000000007456","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Keller Funnel facilitates breast implant placement while minimizing contamination and capsular contracture risk. Antiseptic agents are commonly used as lubricants, but they may carry adverse effects. This study evaluated outcomes of funnel-assisted insertion lubricated with hyaluronic acid compared with manual insertion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 200 patients undergoing primary breast augmentation (2022-2024). Data were collected from the records of 100 patients who received manual implant insertion and 100 patients who underwent implant placement using the funnel technique. Demographics, surgical variables, scar size, insertion time, complications, and patient satisfaction (BODY-Q) were analyzed. Statistical significance was set at a <i>P</i> value of less than 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean patient age was 25.3 years, body mass index was 21.8 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, and implant volume was 330 mL. Scar size was smaller in the funnel group (32 versus 37 mm, <i>P</i> = 0.025). Insertion time was shorter (5.9 versus 57.6 s, <i>P</i> = 0.001). Complications occurred in 1% of funnel cases versus 8% of manual cases (odds ratio: 0.11; 95% confidence interval: 0.01-0.94; <i>P</i> = 0.04). Satisfaction improved significantly postoperatively in both groups (preoperative 54.3 versus 92.6 at 6 mo, <i>P</i> < 0.001) with no between-group difference (<i>P</i> = 0.712).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Funnel insertion with hyaluronic acid reduced scar size, insertion time, and complication risk compared with manual insertion, while achieving high and comparable satisfaction. This technique offers a safe \"no-touch\" alternative that may lower contamination and capsular contracture risk. Prospective studies are needed to validate long-term efficacy and to compare hyaluronic acid with antiseptic additives.</p>","PeriodicalId":20149,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","volume":"14 2","pages":"e7456"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12889300/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146166295","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}