首页 > 最新文献

Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics最新文献

英文 中文
Guidelines Circulated for the Prescription of Benzodiazepines Are Out of Synch with Clinical Practice and Evidence-Based Reviews. 苯二氮卓类药物处方指南与临床实践和循证评价不同步。
IF 22.8 1区 医学 Q1 Psychology Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.1159/000527817
David Fogelson
{"title":"Guidelines Circulated for the Prescription of Benzodiazepines Are Out of Synch with Clinical Practice and Evidence-Based Reviews.","authors":"David Fogelson","doi":"10.1159/000527817","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000527817","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":20744,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":22.8,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9138861","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Longitudinal Development of Symptoms and Staging in Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology: A Tribute to Giovanni Fava. 精神病学和临床心理学中症状和分期的纵向发展:向Giovanni Fava致敬。
IF 22.8 1区 医学 Q1 Psychology Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.1159/000527462
Ulrich Schnyder
The introduction of diagnostic manuals, such as the first mention of mental disorders in the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-6) in 1948 [1] and the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders in 1952 [2], was a big step forward in the fields of psychiatry and clinical psychology. The operationalization of diagnostic criteria for mental disorders such as depression or schizophrenia, which lacked characteristic morphological features or laboratory biomarkers, greatly increased the reliability of clinicians’ diagnoses and their capacity to communicate with one another. However, those classifications were based on a cross-sectional view and informed clinicians, researchers, patients, and their relatives only little about the expected longitudinal course and development of a mental disorder. More specifically, cross-sectional diagnostics did not inform about trajectories of symptom severity over time, individual characteristics and combinations of symptoms, or comorbidities. Such elements are important when it comes to developing a sequential treatment plan and adjusting it as illness characteristics and symptom levels change over time. As early as 1967, Feinstein encouraged clinicians to develop their own “basic science” to use clinical phenomena and data to generate classification systems and to ultimately analyze the clinical process quantitatively [3]. Feinstein appears to have been a lone voice calling in the wilderness at that time though.
{"title":"Longitudinal Development of Symptoms and Staging in Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology: A Tribute to Giovanni Fava.","authors":"Ulrich Schnyder","doi":"10.1159/000527462","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000527462","url":null,"abstract":"The introduction of diagnostic manuals, such as the first mention of mental disorders in the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-6) in 1948 [1] and the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders in 1952 [2], was a big step forward in the fields of psychiatry and clinical psychology. The operationalization of diagnostic criteria for mental disorders such as depression or schizophrenia, which lacked characteristic morphological features or laboratory biomarkers, greatly increased the reliability of clinicians’ diagnoses and their capacity to communicate with one another. However, those classifications were based on a cross-sectional view and informed clinicians, researchers, patients, and their relatives only little about the expected longitudinal course and development of a mental disorder. More specifically, cross-sectional diagnostics did not inform about trajectories of symptom severity over time, individual characteristics and combinations of symptoms, or comorbidities. Such elements are important when it comes to developing a sequential treatment plan and adjusting it as illness characteristics and symptom levels change over time. As early as 1967, Feinstein encouraged clinicians to develop their own “basic science” to use clinical phenomena and data to generate classification systems and to ultimately analyze the clinical process quantitatively [3]. Feinstein appears to have been a lone voice calling in the wilderness at that time though.","PeriodicalId":20744,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":22.8,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10570123","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Virtual Reality Exposure to a Healthy Weight Body Is a Promising Adjunct Treatment for Anorexia Nervosa. 虚拟现实暴露于健康体重的身体是一种有希望的神经性厌食症辅助治疗。
IF 22.8 1区 医学 Q1 Psychology Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.1159/000530932
Simone C Behrens, Joachim Tesch, Philine J B Sun, Sebastian Starke, Michael J Black, Hannah Schneider, Jacopo Pruccoli, Stephan Zipfel, Katrin E Giel

Introduction/objective: Treatment results of anorexia nervosa (AN) are modest, with fear of weight gain being a strong predictor of treatment outcome and relapse. Here, we present a virtual reality (VR) setup for exposure to healthy weight and evaluate its potential as an adjunct treatment for AN.

Methods: In two studies, we investigate VR experience and clinical effects of VR exposure to higher weight in 20 women with high weight concern or shape concern and in 20 women with AN.

Results: In study 1, 90% of participants (18/20) reported symptoms of high arousal but verbalized low to medium levels of fear. Study 2 demonstrated that VR exposure to healthy weight induced high arousal in patients with AN and yielded a trend that four sessions of exposure improved fear of weight gain. Explorative analyses revealed three clusters of individual reactions to exposure, which need further exploration.

Conclusions: VR exposure is a well-accepted and powerful tool for evoking fear of weight gain in patients with AN. We observed a statistical trend that repeated virtual exposure to healthy weight improved fear of weight gain with large effect sizes. Further studies are needed to determine the mechanisms and differential effects.

简介/目的:神经性厌食症(AN)的治疗效果一般,对体重增加的恐惧是治疗结果和复发的一个强有力的预测因素。在这里,我们提出了一个虚拟现实(VR)设置暴露于健康体重,并评估其作为an辅助治疗的潜力。方法:在两项研究中,我们调查了20名高度体重或身材担忧的女性和20名AN女性的VR体验和VR暴露于更高体重的临床效果。结果:在研究1中,90%的参与者(18/20)报告了高度兴奋的症状,但口头表达了低到中等程度的恐惧。研究2表明,VR暴露在健康体重下会引起AN患者的高唤醒,并产生了一种趋势,即四次暴露可以改善对体重增加的恐惧。探索性分析揭示了三组个体对暴露的反应,这需要进一步的探索。结论:VR暴露是引起AN患者体重增加恐惧的一种被广泛接受的强大工具。我们观察到一种统计趋势,即重复虚拟暴露于健康体重的环境中,可以改善对体重增加的恐惧,而且效果显著。需要进一步的研究来确定其机制和差异效应。
{"title":"Virtual Reality Exposure to a Healthy Weight Body Is a Promising Adjunct Treatment for Anorexia Nervosa.","authors":"Simone C Behrens,&nbsp;Joachim Tesch,&nbsp;Philine J B Sun,&nbsp;Sebastian Starke,&nbsp;Michael J Black,&nbsp;Hannah Schneider,&nbsp;Jacopo Pruccoli,&nbsp;Stephan Zipfel,&nbsp;Katrin E Giel","doi":"10.1159/000530932","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000530932","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction/objective: </strong>Treatment results of anorexia nervosa (AN) are modest, with fear of weight gain being a strong predictor of treatment outcome and relapse. Here, we present a virtual reality (VR) setup for exposure to healthy weight and evaluate its potential as an adjunct treatment for AN.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In two studies, we investigate VR experience and clinical effects of VR exposure to higher weight in 20 women with high weight concern or shape concern and in 20 women with AN.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In study 1, 90% of participants (18/20) reported symptoms of high arousal but verbalized low to medium levels of fear. Study 2 demonstrated that VR exposure to healthy weight induced high arousal in patients with AN and yielded a trend that four sessions of exposure improved fear of weight gain. Explorative analyses revealed three clusters of individual reactions to exposure, which need further exploration.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>VR exposure is a well-accepted and powerful tool for evoking fear of weight gain in patients with AN. We observed a statistical trend that repeated virtual exposure to healthy weight improved fear of weight gain with large effect sizes. Further studies are needed to determine the mechanisms and differential effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":20744,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":22.8,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10326841/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9766041","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Patients as Health Producers: The Psychosomatic Foundation of Lifestyle Medicine. 作为健康生产者的病人:生活方式医学的心身基础。
IF 22.8 1区 医学 Q1 Psychology Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.1159/000529953
Giovanni A Fava
N/A.
{"title":"Patients as Health Producers: The Psychosomatic Foundation of Lifestyle Medicine.","authors":"Giovanni A Fava","doi":"10.1159/000529953","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000529953","url":null,"abstract":"N/A.","PeriodicalId":20744,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":22.8,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9949292","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
The Effects of Mindfulness for Youth (MYmind) versus Group Cognitive Behavioral Therapy in Improving Attention and Reducing Behavioral Problems among Children with Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder and Their Parents: A Randomized Controlled Trial. 青少年正念疗法(MYmind)与群体认知行为疗法在改善注意缺陷多动障碍儿童及其父母的注意力和减少行为问题中的作用:一项随机对照试验。
IF 22.8 1区 医学 Q1 Psychology Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-01 DOI: 10.1159/000534962
Samuel Yeung Shan Wong, Stanley Kam Chung Chan, Benjamin Hon Kei Yip, Wenyue Wang, Herman Hay Ming Lo, Dexing Zhang, Susan M Bögels

Introduction: There is a lack of studies evaluating mindfulness-based interventions for children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) compared with an evidence-based control. This randomized controlled trial (RCT) evaluated the effects of mindfulness for youth (MYmind) in improving children's attention, behavior, and parent-related outcomes versus cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT).

Methods: A total of 138 families of children with ADHD aged 8-12 years were recruited from the community with 69 randomized to MYmind and 69 to CBT. Participants were assessed at baseline, immediately after intervention, at 3 months and 6 months. The primary outcome was the attention score of the Sky Search subtest of the Test of Everyday Attention for Children (TEA-Ch). Secondary outcomes were child behavior and parent-related assessments. Linear mixed models were used to assess the efficacy of MYmind compared with CBT.

Results: Both MYmind and CBT significantly improved children's attention score at 6 months (MYmind: β = 1.48, p = 0.013, Cohen's d = 0.32; CBT: β = 1.46, p = 0.008, d = 0.27). There were significant within-group improvements in most secondary outcomes. No significant difference was shown for both primary or secondary outcomes between the two arms at any time point.

Conclusions: Both MYmind and CBT appeared to improve children's attention and behavior outcomes, although no difference was found between these two interventions. This is the largest RCT so far comparing MYmind and CBT although there was loss of follow-up assessments during the pandemic. Further RCTs adopting a non-inferiority design are needed to validate the results.

前言:目前还缺乏评估正念干预对儿童注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)与循证对照的研究。这项随机对照试验(RCT)评估了青少年正念(MYmind)与认知行为疗法(CBT)相比,在改善儿童注意力、行为和父母相关结果方面的效果。方法:从社区中招募138个8-12岁ADHD儿童家庭,其中69个随机分为MYmind组,69个随机分为CBT组。参与者在基线、干预后立即、3个月和6个月时进行评估。主要结果为儿童日常注意力测试(TEA-Ch)的天空搜索子测试的注意得分。次要结果是儿童行为和父母相关的评估。采用线性混合模型评估MYmind与CBT的疗效。结果:MYmind和CBT均能显著改善儿童6个月时的注意力评分(MYmind: β = 1.48, p = 0.013, Cohen’s d = 0.32;CBT: β = 1.46, p = 0.008, d = 0.27)。组内大多数次要结果均有显著改善。两组在任何时间点的主要或次要结局均无显著差异。结论:MYmind和CBT似乎都能改善儿童的注意力和行为结果,尽管这两种干预措施之间没有发现差异。这是迄今为止比较MYmind和CBT的最大的随机对照试验,尽管在大流行期间失去了后续评估。需要进一步采用非劣效性设计的随机对照试验来验证结果。
{"title":"The Effects of Mindfulness for Youth (MYmind) versus Group Cognitive Behavioral Therapy in Improving Attention and Reducing Behavioral Problems among Children with Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder and Their Parents: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Samuel Yeung Shan Wong, Stanley Kam Chung Chan, Benjamin Hon Kei Yip, Wenyue Wang, Herman Hay Ming Lo, Dexing Zhang, Susan M Bögels","doi":"10.1159/000534962","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000534962","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>There is a lack of studies evaluating mindfulness-based interventions for children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) compared with an evidence-based control. This randomized controlled trial (RCT) evaluated the effects of mindfulness for youth (MYmind) in improving children's attention, behavior, and parent-related outcomes versus cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 138 families of children with ADHD aged 8-12 years were recruited from the community with 69 randomized to MYmind and 69 to CBT. Participants were assessed at baseline, immediately after intervention, at 3 months and 6 months. The primary outcome was the attention score of the Sky Search subtest of the Test of Everyday Attention for Children (TEA-Ch). Secondary outcomes were child behavior and parent-related assessments. Linear mixed models were used to assess the efficacy of MYmind compared with CBT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both MYmind and CBT significantly improved children's attention score at 6 months (MYmind: β = 1.48, p = 0.013, Cohen's d = 0.32; CBT: β = 1.46, p = 0.008, d = 0.27). There were significant within-group improvements in most secondary outcomes. No significant difference was shown for both primary or secondary outcomes between the two arms at any time point.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both MYmind and CBT appeared to improve children's attention and behavior outcomes, although no difference was found between these two interventions. This is the largest RCT so far comparing MYmind and CBT although there was loss of follow-up assessments during the pandemic. Further RCTs adopting a non-inferiority design are needed to validate the results.</p>","PeriodicalId":20744,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":22.8,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10794968/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138478360","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Illness Denial in Medical Conditions: The Time Has Come to Include It in DSM Iterations. 医疗条件中的疾病否认:将其纳入 DSM 版本的时机已到。
IF 22.8 1区 医学 Q1 Psychology Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-05 DOI: 10.1159/000533287
Thomas N Wise
{"title":"Illness Denial in Medical Conditions: The Time Has Come to Include It in DSM Iterations.","authors":"Thomas N Wise","doi":"10.1159/000533287","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000533287","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":20744,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":22.8,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10716871/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10217833","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Maternal Benzodiazepines and Z-Drugs Use during Pregnancy and Adverse Birth and Neurodevelopmental Outcomes in Offspring: A Population-Based Cohort Study. 妊娠期间母体苯二氮卓类药物和z类药物的使用、不良出生和后代神经发育结局:一项基于人群的队列研究。
IF 22.8 1区 医学 Q1 Psychology Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.1159/000529141
Adrienne Y L Chan, Le Gao, Louise M Howard, Emily Simonoff, Dave Coghill, Patrick Ip, Wallis C Y Lau, Katja Taxis, Ian C K Wong, Kenneth K C Man

Introduction: The use of benzodiazepines and/or z-drugs in women of childbearing age has increased.

Objective: The aim of the study was to evaluate whether gestational benzodiazepine and/or z-drug exposure is associated with adverse birth and neurodevelopmental outcomes.

Methods: A population-based cohort including mother-child pairs from 2001 to 2018 in Hong Kong was analysed to compare gestationally exposed and nonexposed children on the risk of preterm birth, small for gestational age, autism spectrum disorder (ASD), and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) through logistic/Cox proportional hazards regression with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Sibling-matched analyses and negative control analyses were applied.

Results: When comparing gestationally exposed with gestationally nonexposed children, the weighted odds ratio (wOR) was 1.10 (95% CI = 0.97-1.25) for preterm birth and 1.03 (95% CI = 0.76-1.39) for small for gestational age, while the weighted hazard ratio (wHR) was 1.40 (95% CI = 1.13-1.73) for ASD and 1.15 (95% CI = 0.94-1.40) for ADHD. Sibling-matched analyses showed no association between gestationally exposed children and their gestationally nonexposed siblings for all outcomes (preterm birth: wOR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.66-1.06; small for gestational age: wOR = 1.02, 95% CI = 0.50-2.09; ASD: wHR = 1.10, 95% CI = 0.70-1.72; ADHD: wHR = 1.04, 95% CI = 0.57-1.90). Similarly, no significant differences were observed when comparing children whose mothers took benzodiazepines and/or z-drugs during pregnancy to children whose mothers took benzodiazepines and/or z-drugs before but not during pregnancy for all outcomes.

Conclusions: The findings do not support a causal relationship between gestational benzodiazepines and/or z-drugs exposure and preterm birth, small for gestational age, ASD, or ADHD. Clinicians and pregnant women should carefully balance the known risks of benzodiazepines and/or z-drugs use against those of untreated anxiety and sleep problems.

导读:育龄妇女苯二氮卓类药物和/或z类药物的使用有所增加。目的:本研究的目的是评估妊娠期苯二氮卓类药物和/或z-药物暴露是否与不良出生和神经发育结局相关。方法:通过logistic/Cox比例风险回归,以95%置信区间(CI)对香港2001年至2018年的一项基于人群的母婴队列进行分析,比较妊娠暴露和未暴露儿童早产、小胎龄、自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)和注意力缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)的风险。采用兄弟姐妹配对分析和阴性对照分析。结果:当比较妊娠期暴露与妊娠期未暴露儿童时,早产儿的加权优势比(wOR)为1.10 (95% CI = 0.97-1.25),小胎龄儿童的加权优势比(wOR)为1.03 (95% CI = 0.76-1.39),而ASD的加权风险比(wHR)为1.40 (95% CI = 1.13-1.73), ADHD的加权风险比(wHR)为1.15 (95% CI = 0.94-1.40)。兄弟姐妹配对分析显示,妊娠期暴露的儿童与其妊娠期未暴露的兄弟姐妹在所有结局中均无关联(早产:wOR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.66-1.06;胎龄小:wOR = 1.02, 95% CI = 0.50-2.09;ASD: wHR = 1.10, 95% CI = 0.70-1.72;ADHD: wHR = 1.04, 95% CI = 0.57-1.90)。同样,将母亲在怀孕期间服用苯二氮卓类药物和/或z-药物的儿童与母亲在怀孕前服用苯二氮卓类药物和/或z-药物的儿童进行比较,在所有结果中没有观察到显著差异。结论:研究结果不支持妊娠期苯二氮卓类药物和/或z类药物暴露与早产、小于胎龄、ASD或ADHD之间的因果关系。临床医生和孕妇应仔细权衡苯二氮卓类药物和/或z类药物的已知风险与未经治疗的焦虑和睡眠问题的风险。
{"title":"Maternal Benzodiazepines and Z-Drugs Use during Pregnancy and Adverse Birth and Neurodevelopmental Outcomes in Offspring: A Population-Based Cohort Study.","authors":"Adrienne Y L Chan,&nbsp;Le Gao,&nbsp;Louise M Howard,&nbsp;Emily Simonoff,&nbsp;Dave Coghill,&nbsp;Patrick Ip,&nbsp;Wallis C Y Lau,&nbsp;Katja Taxis,&nbsp;Ian C K Wong,&nbsp;Kenneth K C Man","doi":"10.1159/000529141","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000529141","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The use of benzodiazepines and/or z-drugs in women of childbearing age has increased.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of the study was to evaluate whether gestational benzodiazepine and/or z-drug exposure is associated with adverse birth and neurodevelopmental outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A population-based cohort including mother-child pairs from 2001 to 2018 in Hong Kong was analysed to compare gestationally exposed and nonexposed children on the risk of preterm birth, small for gestational age, autism spectrum disorder (ASD), and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) through logistic/Cox proportional hazards regression with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Sibling-matched analyses and negative control analyses were applied.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>When comparing gestationally exposed with gestationally nonexposed children, the weighted odds ratio (wOR) was 1.10 (95% CI = 0.97-1.25) for preterm birth and 1.03 (95% CI = 0.76-1.39) for small for gestational age, while the weighted hazard ratio (wHR) was 1.40 (95% CI = 1.13-1.73) for ASD and 1.15 (95% CI = 0.94-1.40) for ADHD. Sibling-matched analyses showed no association between gestationally exposed children and their gestationally nonexposed siblings for all outcomes (preterm birth: wOR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.66-1.06; small for gestational age: wOR = 1.02, 95% CI = 0.50-2.09; ASD: wHR = 1.10, 95% CI = 0.70-1.72; ADHD: wHR = 1.04, 95% CI = 0.57-1.90). Similarly, no significant differences were observed when comparing children whose mothers took benzodiazepines and/or z-drugs during pregnancy to children whose mothers took benzodiazepines and/or z-drugs before but not during pregnancy for all outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings do not support a causal relationship between gestational benzodiazepines and/or z-drugs exposure and preterm birth, small for gestational age, ASD, or ADHD. Clinicians and pregnant women should carefully balance the known risks of benzodiazepines and/or z-drugs use against those of untreated anxiety and sleep problems.</p>","PeriodicalId":20744,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":22.8,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9594282","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
More Treatment, but Not Less Anxiety and Mood Disorders: Why? Seven Hypotheses and Their Evaluation. 更多的治疗,但没有减少焦虑和情绪障碍:为什么?七个假设及其评价。
IF 22.8 1区 医学 Q1 Psychology Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.1159/000528544
Johan Ormel, Paul M G Emmelkamp
Mood and anxiety disorders are not only common and responsible for much functional disability [1], but epidemiological studies also indicate that their prevalence, circa 10% in Western countries, has not fallen since the 1970s despite the development of evidence-based treatments [2–8]. Prevalence refers to the percentage of adults in the general population that meet diagnostic criteria in a defined period, usually the 30 days (point prevalence) or 12 months (12-month prevalence) preceding the examination irrespective of possible earlier episodes. In sharp contrast, multiple studies have documented substantial increases in expenditures on mental health care and in treatment rates in Western countries [9–15]. The evidence on increased treatment rates comes from both general practice [16–18], nation-wide morbidity registrations [19, 20], and repeated population-based surveys [8, 21]. The treatment rate increase was bolstered by the introduction of a new class of drugs in the 1980s, the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, aggressively marketed by Big Pharma [22]. In addition, a number of evidence-based psychological treatments became available for people with mood and anxiety disorders. The trend data on prevalence and treatment rate reveal a remarkable paradox: more treatment but not less disorders, the treatment-prevalence paradox. The expectation to see a declining trend in the prevalence of mood and anxiety disorders with an increasing trend in treatment is not unfounded. Treatment seeks to shorten illness episodes, prevent worsening and the development of comorbidity, reduce relapses and curtail recurrences. If effective, increased treatment rates should result in lower prevalence rates in the general population, but this prevalence reduction has not occurred. The increase in the use of statins has led to significant reduction in population cholesterol levels [23]. Likewise, more and better treatment of hypertension has led to less hypertension and associated illness such as heart attacks and strokes illness [24, 25]. At least seven hypotheses can explain why more and better treatments have not reduced common mental disorder prevalence: 1. Increased willingness of individuals to report symptoms and pressures to diagnose distress as anxiety or depression has inflated prevalence rates and masked a true treatment-driven prevalence drop (further: diagnostic inflation).
{"title":"More Treatment, but Not Less Anxiety and Mood Disorders: Why? Seven Hypotheses and Their Evaluation.","authors":"Johan Ormel,&nbsp;Paul M G Emmelkamp","doi":"10.1159/000528544","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000528544","url":null,"abstract":"Mood and anxiety disorders are not only common and responsible for much functional disability [1], but epidemiological studies also indicate that their prevalence, circa 10% in Western countries, has not fallen since the 1970s despite the development of evidence-based treatments [2–8]. Prevalence refers to the percentage of adults in the general population that meet diagnostic criteria in a defined period, usually the 30 days (point prevalence) or 12 months (12-month prevalence) preceding the examination irrespective of possible earlier episodes. In sharp contrast, multiple studies have documented substantial increases in expenditures on mental health care and in treatment rates in Western countries [9–15]. The evidence on increased treatment rates comes from both general practice [16–18], nation-wide morbidity registrations [19, 20], and repeated population-based surveys [8, 21]. The treatment rate increase was bolstered by the introduction of a new class of drugs in the 1980s, the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, aggressively marketed by Big Pharma [22]. In addition, a number of evidence-based psychological treatments became available for people with mood and anxiety disorders. The trend data on prevalence and treatment rate reveal a remarkable paradox: more treatment but not less disorders, the treatment-prevalence paradox. The expectation to see a declining trend in the prevalence of mood and anxiety disorders with an increasing trend in treatment is not unfounded. Treatment seeks to shorten illness episodes, prevent worsening and the development of comorbidity, reduce relapses and curtail recurrences. If effective, increased treatment rates should result in lower prevalence rates in the general population, but this prevalence reduction has not occurred. The increase in the use of statins has led to significant reduction in population cholesterol levels [23]. Likewise, more and better treatment of hypertension has led to less hypertension and associated illness such as heart attacks and strokes illness [24, 25]. At least seven hypotheses can explain why more and better treatments have not reduced common mental disorder prevalence: 1. Increased willingness of individuals to report symptoms and pressures to diagnose distress as anxiety or depression has inflated prevalence rates and masked a true treatment-driven prevalence drop (further: diagnostic inflation).","PeriodicalId":20744,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":22.8,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10273873/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9639174","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Implementing the Biopsychosocial Model in Clinical Medicine: A Tribute to Giovanni Fava. 在临床医学中实施生物心理社会模型:对Giovanni Fava的致敬。
IF 22.8 1区 医学 Q1 Psychology Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.1159/000528451
Stephan Zipfel, Bernd Löwe, Katrin Giel, Hans-Christoph Friederich, Peter Henningsen
aDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany; bDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center HamburgEppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; cDepartment of General Internal Medicine and Psychosomatics, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany; dDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany Received: October 28, 2022 Accepted: November 24, 2022 Published online: December 23, 2022
{"title":"Implementing the Biopsychosocial Model in Clinical Medicine: A Tribute to Giovanni Fava.","authors":"Stephan Zipfel,&nbsp;Bernd Löwe,&nbsp;Katrin Giel,&nbsp;Hans-Christoph Friederich,&nbsp;Peter Henningsen","doi":"10.1159/000528451","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000528451","url":null,"abstract":"aDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany; bDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center HamburgEppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; cDepartment of General Internal Medicine and Psychosomatics, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany; dDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany Received: October 28, 2022 Accepted: November 24, 2022 Published online: December 23, 2022","PeriodicalId":20744,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":22.8,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10566682","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Brief Psychotherapeutic Intervention Compared with Treatment as Usual for Adolescents with Nonsuicidal Self-Injury: Outcomes over a 2-4-Year Follow-Up. 非自杀性自伤青少年的简短心理治疗干预与常规治疗的比较:2-4年随访的结果。
IF 22.8 1区 医学 Q1 Psychology Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-24 DOI: 10.1159/000531092
Franziska Rockstroh, Alexandra Edinger, Johannes Josi, Romuald Brunner, Franz Resch, Michael Kaess

Introduction: The "Cutting Down Programme" (CDP), a brief psychotherapeutic intervention for treating nonsuicidal self-injury (NSSI) in adolescents, was comparable to high-quality treatment as usual (TAU) in a previous randomized controlled trial (RCT).

Objective: The aim of the study was to evaluate the long-term outcomes of the CDP over up to 4 years.

Methods: Assessments of NSSI, suicide attempts, borderline personality disorder (BPD), depression, and quality of life took place 2 to 4 years (T3) after enrollment in a RCT. The evolution of NSSI, suicide attempts, depression, and quality of life was analyzed using (generalized) linear mixed-effects models. Ordered logistic regression was used for analyzing BPD diagnoses. Data from T0, T2, and T3 are reported.

Results: Out of 74 patients, 70 (95%) were included in the T3 assessment. The frequency of NSSI events alongside with suicide attempts and depression further decreased between T2 and T3 and BPD between T0 and T3 in both groups. Quality of life remained stable in both groups between T2 and T3. Both groups received substantial but comparable additional treatment between T2 and T3. More treatment sessions during the follow-up period were linked to larger improvements of NSSI.

Conclusions: The CDP was found to be as effective as TAU in promoting recovery from NSSI and comorbid symptoms in the long term. Results suggest that treatment effects from a brief psychotherapeutic intervention may endure and even further improve after completion of the program. However, additional treatment seems to improve chances for recovery independent from CDP versus TAU.

引言:“减少计划”(CDP)是一种治疗青少年非自杀性自伤(NSSI)的简短心理治疗干预措施,与之前的随机对照试验(RCT)中的高质量照常治疗(TAU)相当。目的:本研究的目的是评估CDP在长达4年内的长期结果。方法:纳入随机对照试验后2-4年(T3),对NSSI、自杀未遂、边缘型人格障碍(BPD)、抑郁和生活质量进行评估。使用(广义)线性混合效应模型分析NSSI、自杀未遂、抑郁和生活质量的演变。采用有序逻辑回归分析BPD诊断。报告了T0、T2和T3的数据。结果:在74名患者中,70名(95%)患者被纳入T3评估。在T2和T3之间,NSSI事件以及自杀未遂和抑郁的频率进一步降低,在T0和T3之间BPD的频率进一步下降。两组患者的生活质量在T2和T3之间保持稳定。在T2和T3之间,两组都接受了实质性但相当的额外治疗。在随访期间,更多的治疗疗程与NSSI的更大改善有关。结论:从长远来看,CDP在促进NSSI和合并症症状的恢复方面与TAU一样有效。结果表明,短期心理治疗干预的治疗效果可能会持续,甚至在项目完成后进一步改善。然而,与TAU相比,额外的治疗似乎可以提高独立于CDP的恢复机会。
{"title":"Brief Psychotherapeutic Intervention Compared with Treatment as Usual for Adolescents with Nonsuicidal Self-Injury: Outcomes over a 2-4-Year Follow-Up.","authors":"Franziska Rockstroh,&nbsp;Alexandra Edinger,&nbsp;Johannes Josi,&nbsp;Romuald Brunner,&nbsp;Franz Resch,&nbsp;Michael Kaess","doi":"10.1159/000531092","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000531092","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The \"Cutting Down Programme\" (CDP), a brief psychotherapeutic intervention for treating nonsuicidal self-injury (NSSI) in adolescents, was comparable to high-quality treatment as usual (TAU) in a previous randomized controlled trial (RCT).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of the study was to evaluate the long-term outcomes of the CDP over up to 4 years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Assessments of NSSI, suicide attempts, borderline personality disorder (BPD), depression, and quality of life took place 2 to 4 years (T3) after enrollment in a RCT. The evolution of NSSI, suicide attempts, depression, and quality of life was analyzed using (generalized) linear mixed-effects models. Ordered logistic regression was used for analyzing BPD diagnoses. Data from T0, T2, and T3 are reported.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 74 patients, 70 (95%) were included in the T3 assessment. The frequency of NSSI events alongside with suicide attempts and depression further decreased between T2 and T3 and BPD between T0 and T3 in both groups. Quality of life remained stable in both groups between T2 and T3. Both groups received substantial but comparable additional treatment between T2 and T3. More treatment sessions during the follow-up period were linked to larger improvements of NSSI.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The CDP was found to be as effective as TAU in promoting recovery from NSSI and comorbid symptoms in the long term. Results suggest that treatment effects from a brief psychotherapeutic intervention may endure and even further improve after completion of the program. However, additional treatment seems to improve chances for recovery independent from CDP versus TAU.</p>","PeriodicalId":20744,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":22.8,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10568598/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9864959","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1