Pub Date : 2026-01-14DOI: 10.1007/s11136-025-04153-0
Natasha N Ludwig, Melissa K Licari, Mary Wojnaroski, Gabrielle Conecker, JayEtta Hecker, Rebecca Hommer, Kelly Muzyczka, Peter Jacoby, Jenny Downs
Purpose: Information on factors contributing to quality of life (QOL) informs meaningful patient-centred care. We evaluated factors influencing QOL in individuals with developmental and epileptic encephalopathy (DEE) and other severe neurodevelopmental encephalopathy conditions using hypothesis-free regression tree analysis.
Methods: A questionnaire was completed by 242 caregivers of individuals two years or older. QOL was measured using the Quality of Life Inventory-Disability (QI-Disability). Independent variables described health, functional abilities and daily activities. The R package rpart was used to build the regression trees to explore the most influential factors associated with QOL.
Results: Median age was 8.8y (interquartile range 4.6-14.9 y). Mean total QI-Disability score was 60.2 ± 14.1 out of a total possible score of 100. The subgroup with the lowest QOL scores comprised individuals with low (raw score < 4) cognition scores measured with the Developmental Profile-4 (n = 52, mean score 46.4) whereas higher QOL scores were achieved by individuals with higher cognition scores and capacity to engage actively when using a touchscreen (n = 123, mean score 67.5).
Conclusion: Regression tree analysis suggests that cognition and use of touchscreens were important factors for QOL. Findings suggest small neurodevelopmental and functional gains may meaningfully improve quality of life for individuals with severe neurodevelopmental encephalopathy.
{"title":"Caregiver-reported quality of life in individuals with developmental and epileptic encephalopathy and other severe neurodevelopmental encephalopathies.","authors":"Natasha N Ludwig, Melissa K Licari, Mary Wojnaroski, Gabrielle Conecker, JayEtta Hecker, Rebecca Hommer, Kelly Muzyczka, Peter Jacoby, Jenny Downs","doi":"10.1007/s11136-025-04153-0","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11136-025-04153-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Information on factors contributing to quality of life (QOL) informs meaningful patient-centred care. We evaluated factors influencing QOL in individuals with developmental and epileptic encephalopathy (DEE) and other severe neurodevelopmental encephalopathy conditions using hypothesis-free regression tree analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A questionnaire was completed by 242 caregivers of individuals two years or older. QOL was measured using the Quality of Life Inventory-Disability (QI-Disability). Independent variables described health, functional abilities and daily activities. The R package rpart was used to build the regression trees to explore the most influential factors associated with QOL.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median age was 8.8y (interquartile range 4.6-14.9 y). Mean total QI-Disability score was 60.2 ± 14.1 out of a total possible score of 100. The subgroup with the lowest QOL scores comprised individuals with low (raw score < 4) cognition scores measured with the Developmental Profile-4 (n = 52, mean score 46.4) whereas higher QOL scores were achieved by individuals with higher cognition scores and capacity to engage actively when using a touchscreen (n = 123, mean score 67.5).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Regression tree analysis suggests that cognition and use of touchscreens were important factors for QOL. Findings suggest small neurodevelopmental and functional gains may meaningfully improve quality of life for individuals with severe neurodevelopmental encephalopathy.</p>","PeriodicalId":20748,"journal":{"name":"Quality of Life Research","volume":"35 2","pages":"45"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12804316/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145966900","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-14DOI: 10.1007/s11136-025-04121-8
Sonja Cassidy, Ove Lintvedt, Francis Odeh, Conceição Granja, Terje Solvoll
Purpose: Many current care assessment frameworks prioritise clinical and organisational outcomes over patient perspectives. This study aimed to identify gaps in existing patient-centred assessment methods and to develop a multilevel framework aligning quality evaluation with patient-defined priorities across macro (policy), meso (organisational), and micro (individual) levels, and technological levels.
Methods: We used a primarily qualitative design, conducting a literature review of patient-centred integrated care assessment studies and integrating these findings with a longitudinal case study that examined how the patient's perspectives were documented across multiple health information systems, synthesising evidence on existing practices with insights into how patient perspectives are integrated and represented for a comprehensive understanding.
Results: In total, 32 studies were included. The review revealed ongoing misalignment between systemic evaluation practices and patient-defined outcomes, particularly for individuals with complex physical and mental health needs. Minimal patient involvement in developing evaluation criteria reflected a disconnect between policy-level targets and individual patient well-being. This misalignment was echoed in the case study, which underscored that personal goals and non-clinical needs were often unrecorded, highlighting the gap between evaluation metrics and genuinely patient-centred care.
Conclusion: Integrated care quality assessment remains misaligned with patient-defined outcomes. We propose Patient-Reported Integrated Measures (PRIMs) as a conceptual contribution. PRIMs complement existing Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROM) and Patient-Reported Experience Measures (PREM) by capturing multidimensional outcomes that matter to patients and ensuring evaluation aligns with their goals. Integrating PRIMs into health information systems and research agendas can realign care evaluation with evolving patient priorities, thereby reducing the risk of leaving patients behind in future healthcare reforms.
{"title":"Moving forward, leaving the patients behind? A multilevel assessment framework for evaluating patient-centred, integrated care quality.","authors":"Sonja Cassidy, Ove Lintvedt, Francis Odeh, Conceição Granja, Terje Solvoll","doi":"10.1007/s11136-025-04121-8","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11136-025-04121-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Many current care assessment frameworks prioritise clinical and organisational outcomes over patient perspectives. This study aimed to identify gaps in existing patient-centred assessment methods and to develop a multilevel framework aligning quality evaluation with patient-defined priorities across macro (policy), meso (organisational), and micro (individual) levels, and technological levels.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a primarily qualitative design, conducting a literature review of patient-centred integrated care assessment studies and integrating these findings with a longitudinal case study that examined how the patient's perspectives were documented across multiple health information systems, synthesising evidence on existing practices with insights into how patient perspectives are integrated and represented for a comprehensive understanding.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 32 studies were included. The review revealed ongoing misalignment between systemic evaluation practices and patient-defined outcomes, particularly for individuals with complex physical and mental health needs. Minimal patient involvement in developing evaluation criteria reflected a disconnect between policy-level targets and individual patient well-being. This misalignment was echoed in the case study, which underscored that personal goals and non-clinical needs were often unrecorded, highlighting the gap between evaluation metrics and genuinely patient-centred care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Integrated care quality assessment remains misaligned with patient-defined outcomes. We propose Patient-Reported Integrated Measures (PRIMs) as a conceptual contribution. PRIMs complement existing Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROM) and Patient-Reported Experience Measures (PREM) by capturing multidimensional outcomes that matter to patients and ensuring evaluation aligns with their goals. Integrating PRIMs into health information systems and research agendas can realign care evaluation with evolving patient priorities, thereby reducing the risk of leaving patients behind in future healthcare reforms.</p>","PeriodicalId":20748,"journal":{"name":"Quality of Life Research","volume":"35 2","pages":"42"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12804283/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145966878","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-14DOI: 10.1007/s11136-025-04140-5
Christina SanInocencio, Scott Demarest, Silvia Weitzman, Hannah Thomas, Ilakkiah Chandran, Yssa DeWoody
Purpose: Ring 14 Syndrome is a rare genetic disorder caused by an anomaly in the 14th chromosome that often leads to intractable epilepsy, moderate to severe intellectual disabilities, slow growth, ocular abnormalities, and more. The presentation and severity of symptoms can greatly vary, making Ring 14 syndrome a complex condition to understand, manage, and treat. Conceptual disease models, also known as disease concept models, provide a formal framework based on the lived experience of patients and families that helps to describe the functional and quality of life impacts of a disease across various domains using qualitative methods.
Methods: To inform the development of a conceptual disease model on Ring 14 Syndrome, 17 caregivers representing 12 patients with Ring 14 Syndrome participated in semi-structured interviews over the course of four months. Data were analyzed using a mix of deductive and inductive inquiry through NVivo Software. Concepts were grouped into domains of patient symptoms and caregiver symptoms, with patient symptoms consisting of two sub-domains: functional impacts (which included cognitive impacts, physical impacts, behavioral impacts, and social-emotional-expressive impacts) and quality of life impacts (which included ADLs, medication side effects, and school/social/community). Caregiver impacts were categorized by mental health, family and social aspects, and medical care.
Results: Patient impacts listed under the cognitive and physical categories align closely with patient impacts referenced in the medical literature. However, impacts listed under the patient quality of life domain as well as the caregiver domain are inadequately represented in the literature, suggesting that the patient perspective has previously been neglected in the medical literature on Ring 14 Syndrome. Further, the numerous mental and physical health impacts on caregivers, grouped with the negative quality of life impacts on Ring 14 patients themselves, warrants further attention, as both have profound effects on health-related quality of life. Finally, while many of the impacts listed in the conceptual disease model may be considered negative aspects of the disorder, there were also positive impacts identified (such as happy demeanor, resilience, and social support) by the community as well.
{"title":"Development of a patient-centered conceptual disease model in Ring 14 syndrome: a patient-centered model of lived experience.","authors":"Christina SanInocencio, Scott Demarest, Silvia Weitzman, Hannah Thomas, Ilakkiah Chandran, Yssa DeWoody","doi":"10.1007/s11136-025-04140-5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-025-04140-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Ring 14 Syndrome is a rare genetic disorder caused by an anomaly in the 14th chromosome that often leads to intractable epilepsy, moderate to severe intellectual disabilities, slow growth, ocular abnormalities, and more. The presentation and severity of symptoms can greatly vary, making Ring 14 syndrome a complex condition to understand, manage, and treat. Conceptual disease models, also known as disease concept models, provide a formal framework based on the lived experience of patients and families that helps to describe the functional and quality of life impacts of a disease across various domains using qualitative methods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To inform the development of a conceptual disease model on Ring 14 Syndrome, 17 caregivers representing 12 patients with Ring 14 Syndrome participated in semi-structured interviews over the course of four months. Data were analyzed using a mix of deductive and inductive inquiry through NVivo Software. Concepts were grouped into domains of patient symptoms and caregiver symptoms, with patient symptoms consisting of two sub-domains: functional impacts (which included cognitive impacts, physical impacts, behavioral impacts, and social-emotional-expressive impacts) and quality of life impacts (which included ADLs, medication side effects, and school/social/community). Caregiver impacts were categorized by mental health, family and social aspects, and medical care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patient impacts listed under the cognitive and physical categories align closely with patient impacts referenced in the medical literature. However, impacts listed under the patient quality of life domain as well as the caregiver domain are inadequately represented in the literature, suggesting that the patient perspective has previously been neglected in the medical literature on Ring 14 Syndrome. Further, the numerous mental and physical health impacts on caregivers, grouped with the negative quality of life impacts on Ring 14 patients themselves, warrants further attention, as both have profound effects on health-related quality of life. Finally, while many of the impacts listed in the conceptual disease model may be considered negative aspects of the disorder, there were also positive impacts identified (such as happy demeanor, resilience, and social support) by the community as well.</p>","PeriodicalId":20748,"journal":{"name":"Quality of Life Research","volume":"35 2","pages":"47"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145966912","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-14DOI: 10.1007/s11136-025-04105-8
Farida Selmouni, Karima Bendahhou, Richard Muwonge, Catherine Sauvaget, Halima Abahssain, Eric Lucas, Hind Mimouni, Rachid Ismaili, Soukaina Bidar, Fatima Zahra Benkaddour, Loubna Abousselham, Youssef Chami, Latifa Belakhal, Partha Basu
<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Measuring quality of life (QoL) in breast cancer survivors is a key 'patient-reported outcome' to optimize survivorship care, however, evidence from low- and middle-income countries is limited. Our prospective study aimed to identify QoL trajectory patterns and their determinants in Moroccan breast cancer patients from diagnosis up to one year post-treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We recruited 830 stage I-III breast cancer patients registered at the two major oncology centres. QoL was assessed using validated EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BR23 questionnaires at pre-treatment, after treatment completion, and at one year post-treatment. Trajectory patterns were identified through group-based modelling.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three distinct QoL trajectories were identified: consistently high (36.1%), moderate (56.4%), and low (7.5%). Stage III disease (OR 6.63, 95% CI 2.35-18.71) was significantly associated with patients in the consistently low trajectory group. Being married (OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.19-0.84), receiving treatment at comprehensive cancer centers (OR 0.12, 95% CI: 0.05-0.27), and management according to international guidelines on breast cancer care (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.24-0.80) reduced the likelihood of being in the consistently low trajectory group. Younger patients (aged < 50) were also more likely to be in the low trajectory pattern. While global health status improved over time (74.8-83.7, p = 0.018), multiple domains showed deterioration, particularly in the low trajectory group. Financial hardship persisted in all groups despite health insurance coverage.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We identified three distinct QoL trajectories. Advanced stage of disease increased risk of poor QoL outcomes, while older age, treatment at comprehensive cancer centers, and protocol-appropriate management were protective determinants. Many women survive breast cancer, but we know little about how their quality-of-life changes during and after treatment, especially in countries with fewer resources like Morocco. Our study followed breast cancer patients for over a year after treatment to understand these changes. Our objective was to identify different patterns in how quality of life changes over time for breast cancer survivors and determine what factors influence these patterns. We found three distinct patterns: some women maintained good quality of life (36%), others had moderate levels (56%), and a smaller group consistently struggled with poor quality of life outcomes (7.5%). Younger patients and those with more advanced cancer were more likely to have poor quality of life outcomes. Receiving treatment according to internationally accepted guidelines at comprehensive cancer centers that provide cancer services - from diagnosis through surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and follow-up all in one location significantly improved quality of life outcomes. Despite most patients having health insurance, many f
目的:衡量乳腺癌幸存者的生活质量(QoL)是优化幸存者护理的关键“患者报告的结果”,然而,来自低收入和中等收入国家的证据有限。我们的前瞻性研究旨在确定摩洛哥乳腺癌患者从诊断到治疗后一年的生活质量轨迹模式及其决定因素。方法:我们招募了在两个主要肿瘤中心登记的830例I-III期乳腺癌患者。在治疗前、治疗完成后和治疗后1年,采用经验证的EORTC QLQ-C30和QLQ-BR23问卷评估生活质量。通过基于组的建模确定轨迹模式。结果:确定了三种不同的生活质量轨迹:持续高(36.1%),中等(56.4%)和低(7.5%)。III期疾病(OR 6.63, 95% CI 2.35-18.71)与持续低轨迹组患者显著相关。已婚(OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.19-0.84),在综合癌症中心接受治疗(OR 0.12, 95% CI: 0.05-0.27),并根据国际乳腺癌护理指南进行管理(OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.24-0.80)降低了处于持续低轨迹组的可能性。结论:我们确定了三种不同的生活质量轨迹。疾病晚期增加了不良生活质量结果的风险,而年龄较大、在综合癌症中心接受治疗和方案适当的管理是保护性决定因素。许多妇女在乳腺癌中幸存下来,但我们对她们在治疗期间和治疗后的生活质量变化知之甚少,特别是在摩洛哥等资源较少的国家。我们的研究对乳腺癌患者进行了一年多的随访,以了解这些变化。我们的目标是确定乳腺癌幸存者生活质量随时间变化的不同模式,并确定影响这些模式的因素。我们发现了三种不同的模式:一些女性保持良好的生活质量(36%),其他女性保持中等水平(56%),还有一小部分女性一直在生活质量差的结果中挣扎(7.5%)。年轻患者和晚期癌症患者的生活质量更可能较差。在提供癌症服务的综合癌症中心根据国际公认的指导方针接受治疗——从诊断到手术、化疗、放疗和随访,所有这些都在一个地方显著提高了生活质量。尽管大多数病人都有医疗保险,但许多人在整个治疗和康复期间都面临经济困难。我们的研究结果有助于确定哪些患者需要额外的支持,并表明综合护理中心和适当的治疗可以提高摩洛哥乳腺癌幸存者的生活质量。
{"title":"Quality of life trajectories in breast cancer survivors up to one year after treatment: a prospective study in a lower-middle-income country.","authors":"Farida Selmouni, Karima Bendahhou, Richard Muwonge, Catherine Sauvaget, Halima Abahssain, Eric Lucas, Hind Mimouni, Rachid Ismaili, Soukaina Bidar, Fatima Zahra Benkaddour, Loubna Abousselham, Youssef Chami, Latifa Belakhal, Partha Basu","doi":"10.1007/s11136-025-04105-8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-025-04105-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Measuring quality of life (QoL) in breast cancer survivors is a key 'patient-reported outcome' to optimize survivorship care, however, evidence from low- and middle-income countries is limited. Our prospective study aimed to identify QoL trajectory patterns and their determinants in Moroccan breast cancer patients from diagnosis up to one year post-treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We recruited 830 stage I-III breast cancer patients registered at the two major oncology centres. QoL was assessed using validated EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BR23 questionnaires at pre-treatment, after treatment completion, and at one year post-treatment. Trajectory patterns were identified through group-based modelling.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three distinct QoL trajectories were identified: consistently high (36.1%), moderate (56.4%), and low (7.5%). Stage III disease (OR 6.63, 95% CI 2.35-18.71) was significantly associated with patients in the consistently low trajectory group. Being married (OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.19-0.84), receiving treatment at comprehensive cancer centers (OR 0.12, 95% CI: 0.05-0.27), and management according to international guidelines on breast cancer care (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.24-0.80) reduced the likelihood of being in the consistently low trajectory group. Younger patients (aged < 50) were also more likely to be in the low trajectory pattern. While global health status improved over time (74.8-83.7, p = 0.018), multiple domains showed deterioration, particularly in the low trajectory group. Financial hardship persisted in all groups despite health insurance coverage.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We identified three distinct QoL trajectories. Advanced stage of disease increased risk of poor QoL outcomes, while older age, treatment at comprehensive cancer centers, and protocol-appropriate management were protective determinants. Many women survive breast cancer, but we know little about how their quality-of-life changes during and after treatment, especially in countries with fewer resources like Morocco. Our study followed breast cancer patients for over a year after treatment to understand these changes. Our objective was to identify different patterns in how quality of life changes over time for breast cancer survivors and determine what factors influence these patterns. We found three distinct patterns: some women maintained good quality of life (36%), others had moderate levels (56%), and a smaller group consistently struggled with poor quality of life outcomes (7.5%). Younger patients and those with more advanced cancer were more likely to have poor quality of life outcomes. Receiving treatment according to internationally accepted guidelines at comprehensive cancer centers that provide cancer services - from diagnosis through surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and follow-up all in one location significantly improved quality of life outcomes. Despite most patients having health insurance, many f","PeriodicalId":20748,"journal":{"name":"Quality of Life Research","volume":"35 2","pages":"46"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145966823","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-09DOI: 10.1007/s11136-025-04120-9
Sharon Walsh, Paddy Gillespie, Anna Hobbins, Ciaran O'Neill, Caroline McCarthy, Frank Moriarty, Barbara Clyne, Fiona Boland, Susan M Smith
{"title":"Analysing the impact of complex multimorbidity on health-related quality of life.","authors":"Sharon Walsh, Paddy Gillespie, Anna Hobbins, Ciaran O'Neill, Caroline McCarthy, Frank Moriarty, Barbara Clyne, Fiona Boland, Susan M Smith","doi":"10.1007/s11136-025-04120-9","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11136-025-04120-9","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":20748,"journal":{"name":"Quality of Life Research","volume":"35 2","pages":"40"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12789114/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145934851","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-09DOI: 10.1007/s11136-025-04100-z
Hanaâ Benjeddi, Kirsten de Groote, Morgan McKnight, Jonne Feitsma, Mariken Gruppen, Zoi Livaditou, Lorynn Teela, Agis Terzidis, Michael Boele van Hensbroek, Martijn van der Kuip, Marceline Tutu van Furth, Lotte Haverman
Introduction: Due to the ongoing global refugee crisis, around 400 million children are currently displaced. We investigate domains of quality of life (QoL) in two groups of displaced children; children living with their caregivers in Closed Control Access Centre (CCAC) Mavrovouni and unaccompanied minors (UAMs) in designated shelters on Lesvos, Greece.
Methods: A mixed-methods study using PROMIS® to quantitatively assess domains of QoL compared to a reference group by using a one-sample Wilcoxon sign-rank test. Associated variables were identified by multivariable linear regression analyses. Open questions were added to UAMs to qualitatively identify elements influencing QoL.
Results: A total of 111 children (N = 94) and UAMs (N = 17) participated. Children across all age groups showed significantly worse scores in various domains compared to the reference group. The youngest group (1-4 years) report more Depressive symptoms but better peer relationships, while the 5-18 year groups reported higher levels of anger, anxiety, depressive symptoms, and pain behavior. Adolescents (8-18 years) reported higher scores on meaning and purpose. A longer duration in camp was associated with higher scores on anxiety and depressive symptoms. UAMs mention separation from family as negatively influencing their mental health. They mention future goals, hope and social support as central to their sense of meaning and purpose.
Conclusion: Displaced children report high levels of anger, anxiety, pain behavior, and depressive symptoms, a prolonged stay in the camps even worsens these outcomes. This underscores the need for tailored interventions to enhance the overall well-being of this vulnerable population.
{"title":"Assessing quality of life in displaced children on Lesvos using PROMIS: a mixed methods study.","authors":"Hanaâ Benjeddi, Kirsten de Groote, Morgan McKnight, Jonne Feitsma, Mariken Gruppen, Zoi Livaditou, Lorynn Teela, Agis Terzidis, Michael Boele van Hensbroek, Martijn van der Kuip, Marceline Tutu van Furth, Lotte Haverman","doi":"10.1007/s11136-025-04100-z","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11136-025-04100-z","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Due to the ongoing global refugee crisis, around 400 million children are currently displaced. We investigate domains of quality of life (QoL) in two groups of displaced children; children living with their caregivers in Closed Control Access Centre (CCAC) Mavrovouni and unaccompanied minors (UAMs) in designated shelters on Lesvos, Greece.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed-methods study using PROMIS<sup>®</sup> to quantitatively assess domains of QoL compared to a reference group by using a one-sample Wilcoxon sign-rank test. Associated variables were identified by multivariable linear regression analyses. Open questions were added to UAMs to qualitatively identify elements influencing QoL.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 111 children (N = 94) and UAMs (N = 17) participated. Children across all age groups showed significantly worse scores in various domains compared to the reference group. The youngest group (1-4 years) report more Depressive symptoms but better peer relationships, while the 5-18 year groups reported higher levels of anger, anxiety, depressive symptoms, and pain behavior. Adolescents (8-18 years) reported higher scores on meaning and purpose. A longer duration in camp was associated with higher scores on anxiety and depressive symptoms. UAMs mention separation from family as negatively influencing their mental health. They mention future goals, hope and social support as central to their sense of meaning and purpose.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Displaced children report high levels of anger, anxiety, pain behavior, and depressive symptoms, a prolonged stay in the camps even worsens these outcomes. This underscores the need for tailored interventions to enhance the overall well-being of this vulnerable population.</p>","PeriodicalId":20748,"journal":{"name":"Quality of Life Research","volume":"35 2","pages":"30"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12789238/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145934788","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-09DOI: 10.1007/s11136-025-04134-3
Berend Terluin, Yong Hao Pua, Piper Fromy, Andrew Trigg, Babette van der Zwaard, Jakob B Bjorner
Purpose: Recently developed minimal important change (MIC) estimation methods recover the mean individual MIC in a sample. These methods are the adjusted predictive modeling (APM) method and the longitudinal confirmatory factor analysis (LCFA) method. Both methods require LCFA of patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) data. In the APM-method, LCFA is used to estimate the reliability of the transition ratings, whereas in the LCFA-method, LCFA is used to estimate the latent MIC. However, LCFA cannot be performed if the PROM is a single item measure (SIM). Adding an auxiliary variable, that is correlated with the PROM, to the LCFA-model may be a solution. We developed three different LCFA-models in which an auxiliary variable is included. In this simulation study, we assessed the performance of the APM- and LCFA-methods to recover the true MIC of an SIM. We applied both methods to a real dataset in which the SIM was a numeric rating scale for pain.
Methods: We simulated 15,552 samples, varying in 11 parameters, and estimated the APM-based and LCFA-based MICs.
Results: The APM-method performed well, except if the proportion improved was high or low, and the present state bias (PSB) was high. The LCFA-method performed well, irrespective of the proportion improved and the PSB. In the real data, the LCFA-based MIC was 17 (on a 100-point scale), whereas the estimated APM-based MIC was 4 points higher, probably due to a high proportion improved and a high PSB.
Conclusion: The MIC of an SIM can be accurately estimated using an auxiliary PROM.
{"title":"Estimating the minimal important change of single-item measures using the adjusted predictive modeling method or the longitudinal confirmatory factor analysis method.","authors":"Berend Terluin, Yong Hao Pua, Piper Fromy, Andrew Trigg, Babette van der Zwaard, Jakob B Bjorner","doi":"10.1007/s11136-025-04134-3","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11136-025-04134-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Recently developed minimal important change (MIC) estimation methods recover the mean individual MIC in a sample. These methods are the adjusted predictive modeling (APM) method and the longitudinal confirmatory factor analysis (LCFA) method. Both methods require LCFA of patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) data. In the APM-method, LCFA is used to estimate the reliability of the transition ratings, whereas in the LCFA-method, LCFA is used to estimate the latent MIC. However, LCFA cannot be performed if the PROM is a single item measure (SIM). Adding an auxiliary variable, that is correlated with the PROM, to the LCFA-model may be a solution. We developed three different LCFA-models in which an auxiliary variable is included. In this simulation study, we assessed the performance of the APM- and LCFA-methods to recover the true MIC of an SIM. We applied both methods to a real dataset in which the SIM was a numeric rating scale for pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We simulated 15,552 samples, varying in 11 parameters, and estimated the APM-based and LCFA-based MICs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The APM-method performed well, except if the proportion improved was high or low, and the present state bias (PSB) was high. The LCFA-method performed well, irrespective of the proportion improved and the PSB. In the real data, the LCFA-based MIC was 17 (on a 100-point scale), whereas the estimated APM-based MIC was 4 points higher, probably due to a high proportion improved and a high PSB.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The MIC of an SIM can be accurately estimated using an auxiliary PROM.</p>","PeriodicalId":20748,"journal":{"name":"Quality of Life Research","volume":"35 2","pages":"39"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12789162/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145945896","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-09DOI: 10.1007/s11136-025-04135-2
Hakimeh Rezaei, Rachel D Woodham, Ali-Reza Ghazi-Noori, Elvira Bramon, Michael Bauer, Allan H Young, Cynthia H Y Fu, Philipp Ritter
Purpose: Individuals with bipolar disorder often experience reduced quality of life (QoL). Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a promising non-invasive treatment for bipolar depression that is portable, safe, and suitable for use at home. We developed a home-based tDCS protocol with real-time remote supervision and examined its effect on QoL in bipolar depression.
Methods: In an open-label design, 44 participants (31 women) with bipolar depression of at least a moderate severity received 21 sessions of home-based tDCS (2 mA, 30 min, F3 anode/F4 cathode) over 6 weeks, with a follow-up visit conducted 5 months from baseline. QoL was assessed using the quality of life enjoyment and satisfaction questionnaire (Q-LES-Q) at baseline, week 2, end of treatment, and follow-up session. Baseline and post treatment scores were compared with healthy control participants (28 adults; 17 women).
Results: At baseline and at the end of treatment, bipolar participants showed a significantly lower Q-LES-Q score than healthy controls (p < 0.001). Within the bipolar group, there was a significant improvement in total Q-LES-Q scores (p < 0.001) and across multiple domains by week 6 and remained elevated at follow-up. Changes in Q-LES-Q were no longer significant after adjustment for depressive symptoms.
Conclusion: A 6-week course of supervised home-based tDCS was associated with significant QoL improvements in bipolar depression, which appeared to be closely linked to reduction in depressive symptoms. Randomized, sham-controlled trials are warranted to clarify the specific contribution of tDCS to improve QoL in bipolar depression.
{"title":"Home-based transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for bipolar depression: effects on quality of life and functioning-an open-label study.","authors":"Hakimeh Rezaei, Rachel D Woodham, Ali-Reza Ghazi-Noori, Elvira Bramon, Michael Bauer, Allan H Young, Cynthia H Y Fu, Philipp Ritter","doi":"10.1007/s11136-025-04135-2","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11136-025-04135-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Individuals with bipolar disorder often experience reduced quality of life (QoL). Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a promising non-invasive treatment for bipolar depression that is portable, safe, and suitable for use at home. We developed a home-based tDCS protocol with real-time remote supervision and examined its effect on QoL in bipolar depression.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In an open-label design, 44 participants (31 women) with bipolar depression of at least a moderate severity received 21 sessions of home-based tDCS (2 mA, 30 min, F3 anode/F4 cathode) over 6 weeks, with a follow-up visit conducted 5 months from baseline. QoL was assessed using the quality of life enjoyment and satisfaction questionnaire (Q-LES-Q) at baseline, week 2, end of treatment, and follow-up session. Baseline and post treatment scores were compared with healthy control participants (28 adults; 17 women).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At baseline and at the end of treatment, bipolar participants showed a significantly lower Q-LES-Q score than healthy controls (p < 0.001). Within the bipolar group, there was a significant improvement in total Q-LES-Q scores (p < 0.001) and across multiple domains by week 6 and remained elevated at follow-up. Changes in Q-LES-Q were no longer significant after adjustment for depressive symptoms.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A 6-week course of supervised home-based tDCS was associated with significant QoL improvements in bipolar depression, which appeared to be closely linked to reduction in depressive symptoms. Randomized, sham-controlled trials are warranted to clarify the specific contribution of tDCS to improve QoL in bipolar depression.</p>","PeriodicalId":20748,"journal":{"name":"Quality of Life Research","volume":"35 2","pages":"33"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12789176/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145934829","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-09DOI: 10.1007/s11136-025-04154-z
Alimzhan Muxunov, Joseph Almazan, Dina Kalinina, Zhanat Kuanshaliyeva, Abduzhappar Gaipov, Dinara Makhadiyeva, Aida Kabibulatova, Meruyert Madikenova, Altay Nabiyev, Antonio Sarria-Santamera
Purpose: Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is a key outcome in chronic kidney disease (CKD), yet data from low- and lower-middle income countries (LLMICs) are underrepresented. The study systematically reviewed and meta-analyzed HRQoL among CKD patients in LLMICs by disease stage and treatment modality.
Methods: Registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251016382), the review searched PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science (January 1, 2000 - March 28, 2025) for studies including adults with CKD stages 1-5, on dialysis, or post-transplant, using validated HRQoL instruments. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed quality using Joanna Briggs Institute tools. Pooled mean scores were estimated using random-effects meta-analysis, with meta-regression and Egger's test exploring heterogeneity and small-study effects.
Results: A total of 123 studies (n = 24,007) from 22 countries were included. Pooled SF-36 scores were 42.8 (95% CI 39.4-46.3) for Physical Component Summary (PCS) and 47.7 (43.8-51.6) for Mental Component Summary (MCS) in early CKD, versus 36.9 (34.0-39.9) and 42.5 (38.9-46.1), respectively, in late CKD. Transplant recipients showed higher HRQoL than dialysis patients across WHOQOL-BREF domains. The EQ-5D index declined from 0.706 (0.589-0.823) in CKD 1-3 to 0.486 (0.357-0.614) in dialysis.
Conclusion: CKD patients in LLMICs experience substantial deterioration in quality of life, particularly at advanced stages. Compared to high-income settings, HRQoL scores in LLMICs remain markedly lower, revealing major global inequities. This first region-specific synthesis provides benchmarks for HRQoL across CKD stages and underscores the need for earlier intervention and broader access to transplantation.
目的:与健康相关的生活质量(HRQoL)是慢性肾脏疾病(CKD)的一个关键结局,但来自低收入和中低收入国家(LLMICs)的数据代表性不足。本研究系统回顾并荟萃分析了慢性阻塞性肺病患者按疾病分期和治疗方式的HRQoL。方法:在PROSPERO注册(CRD420251016382),检索PubMed、Ovid MEDLINE、Scopus和Web of Science(2000年1月1日- 2025年3月28日),包括成人CKD 1-5期、透析或移植后患者,使用经过验证的HRQoL仪器。两位审稿人独立筛选研究,提取数据,并使用乔安娜布里格斯研究所的工具评估质量。使用随机效应荟萃分析估计汇总平均得分,并使用荟萃回归和Egger检验来探索异质性和小研究效应。结果:共纳入来自22个国家的123项研究(n = 24,007)。早期CKD的物理成分总结(PCS)和精神成分总结(MCS)的SF-36评分分别为42.8 (95% CI 39.4-46.3)和47.7(43.8-51.6),而晚期CKD的SF-36评分分别为36.9(34.0-39.9)和42.5(38.9-46.1)。移植受者的HRQoL高于透析患者的WHOQOL-BREF域。EQ-5D指数从CKD 1-3组的0.706(0.589-0.823)下降到透析组的0.486(0.357-0.614)。结论:慢性慢性肾病患者的生活质量显著恶化,尤其是在晚期。与高收入国家相比,低收入中等收入国家的HRQoL得分仍然明显较低,这表明全球存在重大不平等。这一首次区域特异性综合为不同CKD阶段的HRQoL提供了基准,并强调了早期干预和更广泛移植的必要性。
{"title":"Health-related quality of life in chronic kidney disease patients in low- and lower-middle income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Alimzhan Muxunov, Joseph Almazan, Dina Kalinina, Zhanat Kuanshaliyeva, Abduzhappar Gaipov, Dinara Makhadiyeva, Aida Kabibulatova, Meruyert Madikenova, Altay Nabiyev, Antonio Sarria-Santamera","doi":"10.1007/s11136-025-04154-z","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11136-025-04154-z","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is a key outcome in chronic kidney disease (CKD), yet data from low- and lower-middle income countries (LLMICs) are underrepresented. The study systematically reviewed and meta-analyzed HRQoL among CKD patients in LLMICs by disease stage and treatment modality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251016382), the review searched PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science (January 1, 2000 - March 28, 2025) for studies including adults with CKD stages 1-5, on dialysis, or post-transplant, using validated HRQoL instruments. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed quality using Joanna Briggs Institute tools. Pooled mean scores were estimated using random-effects meta-analysis, with meta-regression and Egger's test exploring heterogeneity and small-study effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 123 studies (n = 24,007) from 22 countries were included. Pooled SF-36 scores were 42.8 (95% CI 39.4-46.3) for Physical Component Summary (PCS) and 47.7 (43.8-51.6) for Mental Component Summary (MCS) in early CKD, versus 36.9 (34.0-39.9) and 42.5 (38.9-46.1), respectively, in late CKD. Transplant recipients showed higher HRQoL than dialysis patients across WHOQOL-BREF domains. The EQ-5D index declined from 0.706 (0.589-0.823) in CKD 1-3 to 0.486 (0.357-0.614) in dialysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CKD patients in LLMICs experience substantial deterioration in quality of life, particularly at advanced stages. Compared to high-income settings, HRQoL scores in LLMICs remain markedly lower, revealing major global inequities. This first region-specific synthesis provides benchmarks for HRQoL across CKD stages and underscores the need for earlier intervention and broader access to transplantation.</p>","PeriodicalId":20748,"journal":{"name":"Quality of Life Research","volume":"35 2","pages":"28"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12789224/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145934824","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-09DOI: 10.1007/s11136-025-04123-6
Sabina Clapham, Barbara Daveson, Animut Alebel Ayalew, Kylie Draper, Anita Hartati, Kate Reed, Lisa Redwood, Leeroy William, David Currow
Purpose: Palliative care is delivered across most healthcare settings, yet service capability remains poorly defined, limiting quality improvement. A clearer definition is essential to drive system-wide improvement. This scoping review was undertaken to answer two important questions: What are the key constructs that define palliative care service capability, and how can they inform quality improvement and benchmarking?
Methods: A scoping review, retrieving studies from Medline, PsycINFO, and CINAHL. This scoping review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR). Relevant literature published in English from the year 2000 onwards, focusing on palliative care service delivery, standards, quality, and outcomes were included. Data were organised using an evidence map to define service capability and develop a conceptual framework.
Results: Palliative care service capability is defined as the ability of a service to deliver care, shaped by the broader health system and organisation in which the service operates. Four core domains emerged as central to the concept and were mapped against existing standards, quality indicators and clinical frameworks: (1) assessment, planning, and care provision; (2) transitioning patients between services; (3) availability of care; and (4) collaboration and linkages across health services involved in delivering palliative care.
Conclusion: This review provides a definition and conceptual model for palliative care service capability to support quality assessment and facilitate meaningful benchmarking. Integrating this framework into national quality initiatives may help identify gaps in service and system delivery, standardise care processes, and enhance patient-centred outcomes.
{"title":"Defining palliative care service capability: a scoping review to support quality improvement and benchmarking.","authors":"Sabina Clapham, Barbara Daveson, Animut Alebel Ayalew, Kylie Draper, Anita Hartati, Kate Reed, Lisa Redwood, Leeroy William, David Currow","doi":"10.1007/s11136-025-04123-6","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11136-025-04123-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Palliative care is delivered across most healthcare settings, yet service capability remains poorly defined, limiting quality improvement. A clearer definition is essential to drive system-wide improvement. This scoping review was undertaken to answer two important questions: What are the key constructs that define palliative care service capability, and how can they inform quality improvement and benchmarking?</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping review, retrieving studies from Medline, PsycINFO, and CINAHL. This scoping review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR). Relevant literature published in English from the year 2000 onwards, focusing on palliative care service delivery, standards, quality, and outcomes were included. Data were organised using an evidence map to define service capability and develop a conceptual framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Palliative care service capability is defined as the ability of a service to deliver care, shaped by the broader health system and organisation in which the service operates. Four core domains emerged as central to the concept and were mapped against existing standards, quality indicators and clinical frameworks: (1) assessment, planning, and care provision; (2) transitioning patients between services; (3) availability of care; and (4) collaboration and linkages across health services involved in delivering palliative care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This review provides a definition and conceptual model for palliative care service capability to support quality assessment and facilitate meaningful benchmarking. Integrating this framework into national quality initiatives may help identify gaps in service and system delivery, standardise care processes, and enhance patient-centred outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":20748,"journal":{"name":"Quality of Life Research","volume":"35 2","pages":"38"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12789151/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145934831","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}