首页 > 最新文献

Psychonomic Bulletin & Review最新文献

英文 中文
Preventing fixation: Evidence of item-method directed forgetting protecting against mental impasses in creative problem-solving 防止固着:项目--方法--定向遗忘在创造性问题解决中防止心理障碍的证据
IF 3.5 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2024-09-16 DOI: 10.3758/s13423-024-02564-7
Paula Gauselmann, Tobias Tempel

Creative problem-solving can be impeded by mental impasses which are caused by fixation on associated but misguiding ideas. Recently, research has focused on the question of which processes might be involved in overcoming fixation and how it can be prevented from occurring altogether. In the present study, we investigated whether initially encoded fixation words can be forgotten by means of item-method directed forgetting, a procedure in which participants are presented with a series of items that are each followed by a remember cue or forget cue. Here, the series of items partly consisted of words that were misleadingly associated with compound remote associate problems that had to be solved later on. Two groups were compared: For one group, fixation words were followed by forget cues (fixation-F), whereas for the other group, they were followed by a remember cue (fixation-R). Results revealed three major findings: (1) The fixation-R group showed typical detrimental effects of fixation (i.e., impaired problem-solving performance), whereas there was no significant fixation effect in the fixation-F group, and (2) the magnitude of fixation was positively related to memory for fixation words. The present findings add to existing literature about how fixation negatively affects creative problem-solving and how it can be prevented by reducing the activation level of misleading thoughts.

创造性地解决问题可能会因思维定势而受阻,而思维定势是由固着于相关但误导性的想法所造成的。最近,研究的重点是克服固着可能涉及哪些过程,以及如何防止固着的发生。在本研究中,我们通过 "项目-方法-定向遗忘"(item-method directed forgetting)来研究最初编码的固定词是否会被遗忘。在这里,这一系列项目部分是由与复合远程联想问题误导性关联的单词组成的,而这些问题必须在以后解决。两组被试进行了比较:其中一组的固定词后面是遗忘线索(固定-F),而另一组的固定词后面是记忆线索(固定-R)。结果显示了三个主要发现:(1) 固定-R 组表现出典型的固定有害效应(即解决问题的能力受损),而固定-F 组则没有明显的固定效应;(2) 固定的程度与对固定词的记忆呈正相关。本研究结果为现有文献增添了新的内容,即固着如何对创造性解决问题产生负面影响,以及如何通过降低误导性思维的激活水平来防止固着的产生。
{"title":"Preventing fixation: Evidence of item-method directed forgetting protecting against mental impasses in creative problem-solving","authors":"Paula Gauselmann, Tobias Tempel","doi":"10.3758/s13423-024-02564-7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-024-02564-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Creative problem-solving can be impeded by mental impasses which are caused by fixation on associated but misguiding ideas. Recently, research has focused on the question of which processes might be involved in overcoming fixation and how it can be prevented from occurring altogether. In the present study, we investigated whether initially encoded fixation words can be forgotten by means of item-method directed forgetting, a procedure in which participants are presented with a series of items that are each followed by a remember cue or forget cue. Here, the series of items partly consisted of words that were misleadingly associated with compound remote associate problems that had to be solved later on. Two groups were compared: For one group, fixation words were followed by forget cues (fixation-F), whereas for the other group, they were followed by a remember cue (fixation-R). Results revealed three major findings: (1) The fixation-R group showed typical detrimental effects of fixation (i.e., impaired problem-solving performance), whereas there was no significant fixation effect in the fixation-F group, and (2) the magnitude of fixation was positively related to memory for fixation words. The present findings add to existing literature about how fixation negatively affects creative problem-solving and how it can be prevented by reducing the activation level of misleading thoughts.</p>","PeriodicalId":20763,"journal":{"name":"Psychonomic Bulletin & Review","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142267630","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
L1 production following brief L2 exposure: Evidence for cross-talk across comprehension and production 短暂 L2 接触后的 L1 生产:跨理解和生产的交叉对话证据
IF 3.5 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2024-09-16 DOI: 10.3758/s13423-024-02572-7
Tamar Degani, Hamutal Kreiner, Mathieu Declerck

Language control allows bilinguals to fluently shift between their languages. Here, we tested whether comprehension and production tasks initiate language control processes to the same extent, and whether these processes operate over specific concepts or globally. Seventy Hebrew–English bilinguals completed an L1 picture-naming production task in the first and third blocks, and either a reading aloud (word production) or an animacy judgment (word comprehension) task in their L2 in the second block. Further, concepts were either repeated across blocks or not. Results showed more filled pauses in the third block relative to the first block. Additionally, the size of this blocked-language order effect was similar following word production and word comprehension tasks in the L2, suggesting that production and comprehension tasks were similarly efficient in instigating control processes. Finally, both recurring and new concepts were affected, suggesting that mostly global language control is at play. These findings provide constraining evidence for fully understanding the scope of bilingual language control.

语言控制使双语者能够流畅地在两种语言之间转换。在这里,我们测试了理解和制作任务是否在相同程度上启动了语言控制过程,以及这些过程是在特定概念上还是在全球范围内运行。70 名希伯来语-英语双语者在第一和第三区完成了第一语言的图片命名制作任务,在第二区完成了第二语言的朗读(词语制作)或动画判断(词语理解)任务。此外,概念要么在不同区块间重复,要么不重复。结果显示,与第一区块相比,第三区块的填充停顿更多。此外,在完成第二语言的单词生成和单词理解任务后,这种阻断语言顺序效应的大小相似,这表明生成和理解任务在激发控制过程方面的效率相似。最后,重复出现的概念和新概念都受到了影响,这表明主要是全局语言控制在起作用。这些发现为充分理解二语语言控制的范围提供了限制性证据。
{"title":"L1 production following brief L2 exposure: Evidence for cross-talk across comprehension and production","authors":"Tamar Degani, Hamutal Kreiner, Mathieu Declerck","doi":"10.3758/s13423-024-02572-7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-024-02572-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Language control allows bilinguals to fluently shift between their languages. Here, we tested whether comprehension and production tasks initiate language control processes to the same extent, and whether these processes operate over specific concepts or globally. Seventy Hebrew–English bilinguals completed an L1 picture-naming production task in the first and third blocks, and either a reading aloud (word production) or an animacy judgment (word comprehension) task in their L2 in the second block. Further, concepts were either repeated across blocks or not. Results showed more filled pauses in the third block relative to the first block. Additionally, the size of this blocked-language order effect was similar following word production and word comprehension tasks in the L2, suggesting that production and comprehension tasks were similarly efficient in instigating control processes. Finally, both recurring and new concepts were affected, suggesting that mostly global language control is at play. These findings provide constraining evidence for fully understanding the scope of bilingual language control.</p>","PeriodicalId":20763,"journal":{"name":"Psychonomic Bulletin & Review","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142267478","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Attribute commensurability and context effects in preferential choice 优先选择中的属性可比性和语境效应
IF 3.5 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2024-09-16 DOI: 10.3758/s13423-024-02565-6
William M. Hayes, William R. Holmes, Jennifer S. Trueblood

Context effects in multi-alternative, multi-attribute choice are widely documented, but often elusive. We show that this elusiveness can arise in part from the way that choices are presented. To illustrate this, we use a modeling framework to predict how changes to the format of attribute values, specifically the commensurability of attribute values, influences attention allocation and consequently context effects. Guided by this framework, we show in two online choice experiments (total N = 954 adults) that manipulating the commensurability of attributes leads to different patterns of context effects. Robust attraction and compromise effects are found when attributes are incommensurable (e.g., CPU speed in GHz and RAM memory in GB, or quality ratings on different scales), and mostly null effects occur when attributes are commensurable (e.g., quality ratings on the same scale). Our findings show how the format of choice information can substantially alter the integration of that information and resulting choice patterns.

多选择、多属性选择中的情境效应被广泛记录,但往往难以捉摸。我们的研究表明,这种难以捉摸可能部分源于选择的呈现方式。为了说明这一点,我们使用了一个建模框架来预测属性值格式的变化,特别是属性值的可比性,是如何影响注意力分配并进而产生情境效应的。在这一框架的指导下,我们在两个在线选择实验(总人数 = 954 名成人)中表明,操纵属性的可比性会导致不同的情境效应模式。当属性不可通约时(例如,CPU 速度以 GHz 为单位,内存以 GB 为单位,或质量评级以不同的标度为单位),会出现稳健的吸引和折衷效应;而当属性可通约时(例如,质量评级以相同的标度为单位),则会出现大部分无效效应。我们的研究结果表明,选择信息的格式会在很大程度上改变信息的整合以及由此产生的选择模式。
{"title":"Attribute commensurability and context effects in preferential choice","authors":"William M. Hayes, William R. Holmes, Jennifer S. Trueblood","doi":"10.3758/s13423-024-02565-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-024-02565-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Context effects in multi-alternative, multi-attribute choice are widely documented, but often elusive. We show that this elusiveness can arise in part from the way that choices are presented. To illustrate this, we use a modeling framework to predict how changes to the format of attribute values, specifically the commensurability of attribute values, influences attention allocation and consequently context effects. Guided by this framework, we show in two online choice experiments (total <i>N</i> = 954 adults) that manipulating the commensurability of attributes leads to different patterns of context effects. Robust attraction and compromise effects are found when attributes are incommensurable (e.g., CPU speed in GHz and RAM memory in GB, or quality ratings on different scales), and mostly null effects occur when attributes are commensurable (e.g., quality ratings on the same scale). Our findings show how the format of choice information can substantially alter the integration of that information and resulting choice patterns.</p>","PeriodicalId":20763,"journal":{"name":"Psychonomic Bulletin & Review","volume":"39 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142267629","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Recognition memory fluctuates with sustained attention regardless of task relevance 识别记忆随持续注意力波动,与任务相关性无关
IF 3.5 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2024-09-16 DOI: 10.3758/s13423-024-02560-x
Anna Corriveau, Alfred F. Chao, Megan T. deBettencourt, Monica D. Rosenberg

Sustained attention fluctuates over time, affecting task-related processing and memory. However, it is less clear how attentional state affects processing and memory when images are accompanied by irrelevant visual information. We first quantify behavioral signatures of attentional state in an online sample (N1=92) and demonstrate that images presented in high attentional states are better remembered. Next, we test how sustained attention influences memory in two online samples (N2=188, N3=185) when task-irrelevant images are present. We show that high attention leads to better memory for both task-relevant and task-irrelevant images. This suggests that sustained attentional state does selectively affect processing for task-relevant information, but rather affects processing broadly, regardless of task relevance. Finally, we show that other components of attention such as selective attention contribute to the mnemonic fate of stimuli. Our findings highlight the necessity of considering and characterizing attention’s unique components and their effects on cognition.

持续注意力会随时间波动,影响与任务相关的处理和记忆。然而,当图像伴有不相关的视觉信息时,注意力状态如何影响处理和记忆却不太清楚。我们首先量化了在线样本(N1=92)中注意状态的行为特征,并证明在高注意状态下呈现的图像记忆效果更好。接下来,我们在两个在线样本(N2=188,N3=185)中测试了当出现与任务无关的图像时,持续注意力如何影响记忆。结果表明,高度注意会导致对任务相关和任务不相关图像的记忆都更好。这表明,持续的注意力状态确实会选择性地影响对任务相关信息的处理,而是会广泛地影响处理过程,而与任务相关性无关。最后,我们表明,注意力的其他组成部分(如选择性注意力)也有助于刺激物的记忆命运。我们的研究结果凸显了考虑和描述注意力的独特成分及其对认知影响的必要性。
{"title":"Recognition memory fluctuates with sustained attention regardless of task relevance","authors":"Anna Corriveau, Alfred F. Chao, Megan T. deBettencourt, Monica D. Rosenberg","doi":"10.3758/s13423-024-02560-x","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-024-02560-x","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Sustained attention fluctuates over time, affecting task-related processing and memory. However, it is less clear how attentional state affects processing and memory when images are accompanied by irrelevant visual information. We first quantify behavioral signatures of attentional state in an online sample (N1=92) and demonstrate that images presented in high attentional states are better remembered. Next, we test how sustained attention influences memory in two online samples (N2=188, N3=185) when task-irrelevant images are present. We show that high attention leads to better memory for both task-relevant and task-irrelevant images. This suggests that sustained attentional state does selectively affect processing for task-relevant information, but rather affects processing broadly, regardless of task relevance. Finally, we show that other components of attention such as selective attention contribute to the mnemonic fate of stimuli. Our findings highlight the necessity of considering and characterizing attention’s unique components and their effects on cognition.</p>","PeriodicalId":20763,"journal":{"name":"Psychonomic Bulletin & Review","volume":"57 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142267628","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A meta-analysis on the relationship between subjective cognitive failures as measured by the cognitive failures questionnaire (CFQ) and objective performance on executive function tasks. 关于认知失败问卷(CFQ)测量的主观认知失败与执行功能任务客观表现之间关系的荟萃分析。
IF 3.2 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2024-09-09 DOI: 10.3758/s13423-024-02573-6
Stephanie C Goodhew, Mark Edwards

The Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (CFQ) has been widely used as a measure of subjective cognitive function in everyday life for decades. However, the evidence on how it relates to objective performance on executive function tasks is mixed. One possible reason for these mixed results is that the CFQ has selective relationships with some aspects of executive function and not others. Here, therefore, we classified tasks according to an influential framework of executive functions-switching, updating, inhibition, and we also considered the Sustained Attention to Response Task (SART) as a category because it was custom designed to gauge cognitive failures. We synthesized a large body of available evidence and performed four Bayesian meta-analyses on the relationship between CFQ scores and objective performance on executive function tasks in these four categories. Results suggested that CFQ scores were associated with objective performance on SART (18 effect sizes, μ = -.19, BF10 = 18.03, i.e., 18.03 times more evidence of a relationship versus no relationship), updating working memory (49 effect sizes, μ = -.06, BF10 = 17.80), and inhibition tasks (41 effect sizes, μ = -.07, BF10 = 15.40), whereas there was not definitive evidence regarding switching (34 effect sizes, μ = -.06, BF10 = .50, i.e., two times greater evidence for no relationship). This suggests that subjective cognitive function can predict objective performance on at least some executive function tasks. We discuss methodological and theoretical factors that constrain the maximum observable correlation and consider the relative insights that subjective measures versus task performance provide.

几十年来,认知失败问卷(CFQ)一直被广泛用于测量日常生活中的主观认知功能。然而,关于它与执行功能任务的客观表现之间的关系的证据却不尽相同。造成这些混合结果的一个可能原因是,CFQ 与执行功能的某些方面有选择性的关系,而与其他方面则没有。因此,我们根据执行功能的一个有影响力的框架--转换、更新、抑制--对任务进行了分类,我们还将持续注意反应任务(SART)视为一个类别,因为它是为测量认知失败而专门设计的。我们综合了大量现有证据,对 CFQ 分数与这四类执行功能任务的客观表现之间的关系进行了四次贝叶斯元分析。结果表明,CFQ 分数与 SART 的客观表现相关(18 个效应大小,μ = -.19, BF10 = 18.03,即:CFQ 分数是 SART 客观表现的 18.03 倍、18.03倍)、更新工作记忆(49个效应大小,μ=-.06,BF10=17.80)和抑制任务(41个效应大小,μ=-.07,BF10=15.40),而在转换任务(34个效应大小,μ=-.06,BF10=.50,即2倍的证据表明没有关系)方面则没有确切的证据。这表明,主观认知功能至少可以预测某些执行功能任务的客观表现。我们讨论了限制可观察到的最大相关性的方法和理论因素,并考虑了主观测量与任务表现所提供的相对洞察力。
{"title":"A meta-analysis on the relationship between subjective cognitive failures as measured by the cognitive failures questionnaire (CFQ) and objective performance on executive function tasks.","authors":"Stephanie C Goodhew, Mark Edwards","doi":"10.3758/s13423-024-02573-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-024-02573-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (CFQ) has been widely used as a measure of subjective cognitive function in everyday life for decades. However, the evidence on how it relates to objective performance on executive function tasks is mixed. One possible reason for these mixed results is that the CFQ has selective relationships with some aspects of executive function and not others. Here, therefore, we classified tasks according to an influential framework of executive functions-switching, updating, inhibition, and we also considered the Sustained Attention to Response Task (SART) as a category because it was custom designed to gauge cognitive failures. We synthesized a large body of available evidence and performed four Bayesian meta-analyses on the relationship between CFQ scores and objective performance on executive function tasks in these four categories. Results suggested that CFQ scores were associated with objective performance on SART (18 effect sizes, μ = -.19, BF<sub>10</sub> = 18.03, i.e., 18.03 times more evidence of a relationship versus no relationship), updating working memory (49 effect sizes, μ = -.06, BF<sub>10</sub> = 17.80), and inhibition tasks (41 effect sizes, μ = -.07, BF<sub>10</sub> = 15.40), whereas there was not definitive evidence regarding switching (34 effect sizes, μ = -.06, BF<sub>10</sub> = .50, i.e., two times greater evidence for no relationship). This suggests that subjective cognitive function can predict objective performance on at least some executive function tasks. We discuss methodological and theoretical factors that constrain the maximum observable correlation and consider the relative insights that subjective measures versus task performance provide.</p>","PeriodicalId":20763,"journal":{"name":"Psychonomic Bulletin & Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142154818","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Towards a model of eye-movement control in Chinese reading. 建立中文阅读中的眼动控制模型。
IF 3.2 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2024-09-06 DOI: 10.3758/s13423-024-02570-9
Yanping Liu, Lili Yu, Erik D Reichle

The Chinese writing system has several features that make it markedly different from the alphabetic systems that have most often been examined in reading research, including the fact that individual words consist of various uniformly sized, box-shaped characters whose boundaries are not clearly demarcated (e.g., by blank spaces). These features raise the question: How do readers of Chinese "know" where to move their eyes for the purpose of efficiently segmenting and/or identifying words? To answer this question, we used the E-Z Reader model of eye-movement control in reading to run an 'experiment' involving a series of simulations in which two saccade-targeting assumptions (i.e., directing the eyes towards default targets vs. adjusting saccade length as a function of parafoveal processing difficulty) were factorially manipulated with three word-segmentation heuristics (i.e., ideal-observer knowledge of word boundaries vs. probabilistic guessing vs. familiarity-based segmentation) to examine which combination of assumptions provide the best quantitative account of eye-movement control during the reading of Chinese. Based on these simulations, we conclude the best account is one in which readers use relative differences in the familiarity of groups of parafoveal characters to dynamically adjust the lengths of saccades in a manner that affords efficient word identification. We discuss the broader theoretical implications of these conclusions for models of Chinese reading and for models of reading more generally.

中文书写系统有几个特点,使其与阅读研究中最常考察的字母系统明显不同,其中包括单个词由各种大小一致的方块字组成,其边界没有明确划分(如空白)。这些特点提出了一个问题:中文读者如何 "知道 "自己的视线应向何处移动,从而有效地分割和/或识别词语?为了回答这个问题,我们利用 E-Z Reader 阅读中的眼动控制模型进行了一系列模拟实验,在这些实验中,两种囊状视线瞄准假设(即将视线指向默认目标与根据视网膜旁处理难度调整囊状视线长度)与三种单词分割启发式(即、理想观察者对单词边界的了解 vs. 概率猜测 vs. 基于熟悉度的分词),以考察哪种假设组合能最好地定量解释中文阅读过程中的眼动控制。在这些模拟的基础上,我们得出结论:最佳的解释是读者利用视网膜旁字符组熟悉程度的相对差异来动态调整眼动的长度,从而实现高效的单词识别。我们将讨论这些结论对中文阅读模型和一般阅读模型的广泛理论意义。
{"title":"Towards a model of eye-movement control in Chinese reading.","authors":"Yanping Liu, Lili Yu, Erik D Reichle","doi":"10.3758/s13423-024-02570-9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-024-02570-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Chinese writing system has several features that make it markedly different from the alphabetic systems that have most often been examined in reading research, including the fact that individual words consist of various uniformly sized, box-shaped characters whose boundaries are not clearly demarcated (e.g., by blank spaces). These features raise the question: How do readers of Chinese \"know\" where to move their eyes for the purpose of efficiently segmenting and/or identifying words? To answer this question, we used the E-Z Reader model of eye-movement control in reading to run an 'experiment' involving a series of simulations in which two saccade-targeting assumptions (i.e., directing the eyes towards default targets vs. adjusting saccade length as a function of parafoveal processing difficulty) were factorially manipulated with three word-segmentation heuristics (i.e., ideal-observer knowledge of word boundaries vs. probabilistic guessing vs. familiarity-based segmentation) to examine which combination of assumptions provide the best quantitative account of eye-movement control during the reading of Chinese. Based on these simulations, we conclude the best account is one in which readers use relative differences in the familiarity of groups of parafoveal characters to dynamically adjust the lengths of saccades in a manner that affords efficient word identification. We discuss the broader theoretical implications of these conclusions for models of Chinese reading and for models of reading more generally.</p>","PeriodicalId":20763,"journal":{"name":"Psychonomic Bulletin & Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142140887","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Human retrograde amnesia and memory consolidation. 人类逆行性遗忘症与记忆巩固。
IF 3.2 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2024-09-04 DOI: 10.3758/s13423-024-02567-4
Panayiotis P Ketonis, Thomas Q McClelland, Dani Parra, Gabriel A Radvansky

This paper reports a reassessment of published literature on the question of whether retrograde amnesia data from patients with severe trauma supports the idea that there is ongoing consolidation of long-lasting memories. That is, memory consolidation continues for decades with older memories being increasingly consolidated, and, thus, more protected from forgetting. Our analysis was limited to patients with specific traumas rather than neurodegenerative conditions that can be complicated by the additional presence of significant anterograde amnesia. These constraints were used because trauma patients have a definitive start to their amnesia allowing comparison of their memories before this event, unlike when there is an undefined amnesia onset. Our results revealed that the standard account of retrograde amnesia only fits part of the data, with more than half not conforming to this account. Specifically, damage to different brain areas was associated with different patterns of retrograde amnesia. Those cases where the standard retrograde amnesia account was held tended to involve damage to the hippocampus and temporal lobes, as expected. Future directions to better understand the influence of retrograde amnesia and memory consolidation are suggested.

本文报告了对已发表文献的重新评估,这些文献涉及严重创伤患者的逆行性遗忘数据是否支持长期记忆持续巩固的观点。也就是说,记忆的巩固会持续数十年,较早的记忆会越来越巩固,因此更能避免遗忘。我们的分析仅限于有特定创伤的患者,而不是神经退行性疾病患者,因为神经退行性疾病患者可能会因严重的逆行性遗忘而变得复杂。之所以采用这些限制条件,是因为创伤患者的遗忘症有一个明确的起始时间,可以对其在这一事件之前的记忆进行比较,这与遗忘症起始时间不明确的情况不同。我们的研究结果表明,逆行性遗忘症的标准说法只符合部分数据,有一半以上的数据不符合这一说法。具体来说,不同脑区的损伤与逆行性失忆的不同模式有关。符合标准逆行性遗忘的病例往往涉及海马和颞叶的损伤,这也是意料之中的。本文提出了未来的研究方向,以更好地理解逆行性遗忘和记忆巩固的影响。
{"title":"Human retrograde amnesia and memory consolidation.","authors":"Panayiotis P Ketonis, Thomas Q McClelland, Dani Parra, Gabriel A Radvansky","doi":"10.3758/s13423-024-02567-4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-024-02567-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper reports a reassessment of published literature on the question of whether retrograde amnesia data from patients with severe trauma supports the idea that there is ongoing consolidation of long-lasting memories. That is, memory consolidation continues for decades with older memories being increasingly consolidated, and, thus, more protected from forgetting. Our analysis was limited to patients with specific traumas rather than neurodegenerative conditions that can be complicated by the additional presence of significant anterograde amnesia. These constraints were used because trauma patients have a definitive start to their amnesia allowing comparison of their memories before this event, unlike when there is an undefined amnesia onset. Our results revealed that the standard account of retrograde amnesia only fits part of the data, with more than half not conforming to this account. Specifically, damage to different brain areas was associated with different patterns of retrograde amnesia. Those cases where the standard retrograde amnesia account was held tended to involve damage to the hippocampus and temporal lobes, as expected. Future directions to better understand the influence of retrograde amnesia and memory consolidation are suggested.</p>","PeriodicalId":20763,"journal":{"name":"Psychonomic Bulletin & Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142126516","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Numerical comparisons of exponential expressions: The saliency of the base component. 指数表达式的数值比较:基数部分的显著性
IF 3.2 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2024-09-04 DOI: 10.3758/s13423-024-02571-8
Ami Feder, Mariya Lozin, Nadav Neumann, Michal Pinhas

Exponential expressions represent series that grow at a fast pace such as carbon pollution and the spread of disease. Despite their importance, people tend to struggle with these expressions. In two experiments, participants chose the larger of two exponential expressions as quickly and accurately as possible. We manipulated the distance between the base/power components and their compatibility. In base-power compatible pairs, both the base and power of one expression were larger than the other (e.g., 23 vs. 34), while in base-power incompatible pairs, the base of one expression was larger than the base in the other expression but the relation between the power components of the two expressions was reversed (e.g., 32 vs. 24). Moreover, while in the first experiment the larger power always led to the larger result, in the second experiment we introduced base-result congruent pairs as well. Namely, the larger base led to the larger result. Our results showed a base-power compatibility effect, which was also larger for larger power distances (Experiments 1-2). Furthermore, participants processed the base-result congruent pairs faster and more accurately than the power-result congruent pairs (Experiment 2). These findings suggest that while both the base and power components are processed when comparing exponential expressions, the base is more salient. This exemplifies an incorrect processing of the syntax of exponential expressions, where the power typically has a larger mathematical contribution to the result of the expression.

指数表达式表示快速增长的数列,如碳污染和疾病传播。尽管这些表达式非常重要,但人们往往难以掌握。在两个实验中,受试者尽可能快速准确地选择两个指数表达式中较大的一个。我们对基数/幂数成分之间的距离及其兼容性进行了处理。在基数与幂数相容的情况下,一个表达式的基数和幂数都大于另一个表达式(如 23 对 34);而在基数与幂数不相容的情况下,一个表达式的基数大于另一个表达式的基数,但两个表达式的幂数成分之间的关系却相反(如 32 对 24)。此外,在第一个实验中,较大的幂总是导致较大的结果,而在第二个实验中,我们也引入了基数-结果一致的对。也就是说,基数越大,结果越大。我们的结果显示了基数-功率相容效应,功率距离越大,基数-功率相容效应也越大(实验 1-2)。此外,参与者处理基数-结果一致的配对比处理功率-结果一致的配对更快、更准确(实验 2)。这些发现表明,在比较指数表达式时,虽然基数和幂数成分都会被处理,但基数更突出。这说明对指数表达式语法的处理是不正确的,因为幂通常对表达式的结果有更大的数学贡献。
{"title":"Numerical comparisons of exponential expressions: The saliency of the base component.","authors":"Ami Feder, Mariya Lozin, Nadav Neumann, Michal Pinhas","doi":"10.3758/s13423-024-02571-8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-024-02571-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Exponential expressions represent series that grow at a fast pace such as carbon pollution and the spread of disease. Despite their importance, people tend to struggle with these expressions. In two experiments, participants chose the larger of two exponential expressions as quickly and accurately as possible. We manipulated the distance between the base/power components and their compatibility. In base-power compatible pairs, both the base and power of one expression were larger than the other (e.g., 2<sup>3</sup> vs. 3<sup>4</sup>), while in base-power incompatible pairs, the base of one expression was larger than the base in the other expression but the relation between the power components of the two expressions was reversed (e.g., 3<sup>2</sup> vs. 2<sup>4</sup>). Moreover, while in the first experiment the larger power always led to the larger result, in the second experiment we introduced base-result congruent pairs as well. Namely, the larger base led to the larger result. Our results showed a base-power compatibility effect, which was also larger for larger power distances (Experiments 1-2). Furthermore, participants processed the base-result congruent pairs faster and more accurately than the power-result congruent pairs (Experiment 2). These findings suggest that while both the base and power components are processed when comparing exponential expressions, the base is more salient. This exemplifies an incorrect processing of the syntax of exponential expressions, where the power typically has a larger mathematical contribution to the result of the expression.</p>","PeriodicalId":20763,"journal":{"name":"Psychonomic Bulletin & Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142133523","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
What we mean when we say semantic: Toward a multidisciplinary semantic glossary. 当我们说语义时,我们指的是什么:走向多学科语义词汇表。
IF 3.2 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2024-09-04 DOI: 10.3758/s13423-024-02556-7
Jamie Reilly, Cory Shain, Valentina Borghesani, Philipp Kuhnke, Gabriella Vigliocco, Jonathan E Peelle, Bradford Z Mahon, Laurel J Buxbaum, Asifa Majid, Marc Brysbaert, Anna M Borghi, Simon De Deyne, Guy Dove, Liuba Papeo, Penny M Pexman, David Poeppel, Gary Lupyan, Paulo Boggio, Gregory Hickok, Laura Gwilliams, Leonardo Fernandino, Daniel Mirman, Evangelia G Chrysikou, Chaleece W Sandberg, Sebastian J Crutch, Liina Pylkkänen, Eiling Yee, Rebecca L Jackson, Jennifer M Rodd, Marina Bedny, Louise Connell, Markus Kiefer, David Kemmerer, Greig de Zubicaray, Elizabeth Jefferies, Dermot Lynott, Cynthia S Q Siew, Rutvik H Desai, Ken McRae, Michele T Diaz, Marianna Bolognesi, Evelina Fedorenko, Swathi Kiran, Maria Montefinese, Jeffrey R Binder, Melvin J Yap, Gesa Hartwigsen, Jessica Cantlon, Yanchao Bi, Paul Hoffman, Frank E Garcea, David Vinson

Tulving characterized semantic memory as a vast repository of meaning that underlies language and many other cognitive processes. This perspective on lexical and conceptual knowledge galvanized a new era of research undertaken by numerous fields, each with their own idiosyncratic methods and terminology. For example, "concept" has different meanings in philosophy, linguistics, and psychology. As such, many fundamental constructs used to delineate semantic theories remain underspecified and/or opaque. Weak construct specificity is among the leading causes of the replication crisis now facing psychology and related fields. Term ambiguity hinders cross-disciplinary communication, falsifiability, and incremental theory-building. Numerous cognitive subdisciplines (e.g., vision, affective neuroscience) have recently addressed these limitations via the development of consensus-based guidelines and definitions. The project to follow represents our effort to produce a multidisciplinary semantic glossary consisting of succinct definitions, background, principled dissenting views, ratings of agreement, and subjective confidence for 17 target constructs (e.g., abstractness, abstraction, concreteness, concept, embodied cognition, event semantics, lexical-semantic, modality, representation, semantic control, semantic feature, simulation, semantic distance, semantic dimension). We discuss potential benefits and pitfalls (e.g., implicit bias, prescriptiveness) of these efforts to specify a common nomenclature that other researchers might index in specifying their own theoretical perspectives (e.g., They said X, but I mean Y).

图尔温将语义记忆描述为一个巨大的意义库,是语言和许多其他认知过程的基础。这种关于词汇和概念知识的观点激发了众多领域开展研究的新时代,每个领域都有自己独特的方法和术语。例如,"概念 "在哲学、语言学和心理学中有着不同的含义。因此,许多用来划分语义理论的基本构式仍然不够具体和/或不透明。构造不明确是心理学及相关领域目前面临的复制危机的主要原因之一。术语的模糊性阻碍了跨学科交流、可证伪性和渐进式理论建设。许多认知亚学科(如视觉、情感神经科学)最近都通过制定基于共识的指南和定义来解决这些局限性。接下来的项目代表了我们为编制多学科语义词汇表所做的努力,该词汇表由简洁的定义、背景、原则性的不同观点、同意度评级以及 17 个目标构造(如抽象性、抽象、具体性、概念、具身认知、事件语义、词汇语义、模态、表征、语义控制、语义特征、模拟、语义距离、语义维度)的主观信心组成。我们讨论了这些努力的潜在益处和隐患(如隐含偏见、规定性),这些努力旨在指定一个通用术语,其他研究人员在指定自己的理论视角时可将其作为索引(如他们说 X,但我的意思是 Y)。
{"title":"What we mean when we say semantic: Toward a multidisciplinary semantic glossary.","authors":"Jamie Reilly, Cory Shain, Valentina Borghesani, Philipp Kuhnke, Gabriella Vigliocco, Jonathan E Peelle, Bradford Z Mahon, Laurel J Buxbaum, Asifa Majid, Marc Brysbaert, Anna M Borghi, Simon De Deyne, Guy Dove, Liuba Papeo, Penny M Pexman, David Poeppel, Gary Lupyan, Paulo Boggio, Gregory Hickok, Laura Gwilliams, Leonardo Fernandino, Daniel Mirman, Evangelia G Chrysikou, Chaleece W Sandberg, Sebastian J Crutch, Liina Pylkkänen, Eiling Yee, Rebecca L Jackson, Jennifer M Rodd, Marina Bedny, Louise Connell, Markus Kiefer, David Kemmerer, Greig de Zubicaray, Elizabeth Jefferies, Dermot Lynott, Cynthia S Q Siew, Rutvik H Desai, Ken McRae, Michele T Diaz, Marianna Bolognesi, Evelina Fedorenko, Swathi Kiran, Maria Montefinese, Jeffrey R Binder, Melvin J Yap, Gesa Hartwigsen, Jessica Cantlon, Yanchao Bi, Paul Hoffman, Frank E Garcea, David Vinson","doi":"10.3758/s13423-024-02556-7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-024-02556-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Tulving characterized semantic memory as a vast repository of meaning that underlies language and many other cognitive processes. This perspective on lexical and conceptual knowledge galvanized a new era of research undertaken by numerous fields, each with their own idiosyncratic methods and terminology. For example, \"concept\" has different meanings in philosophy, linguistics, and psychology. As such, many fundamental constructs used to delineate semantic theories remain underspecified and/or opaque. Weak construct specificity is among the leading causes of the replication crisis now facing psychology and related fields. Term ambiguity hinders cross-disciplinary communication, falsifiability, and incremental theory-building. Numerous cognitive subdisciplines (e.g., vision, affective neuroscience) have recently addressed these limitations via the development of consensus-based guidelines and definitions. The project to follow represents our effort to produce a multidisciplinary semantic glossary consisting of succinct definitions, background, principled dissenting views, ratings of agreement, and subjective confidence for 17 target constructs (e.g., abstractness, abstraction, concreteness, concept, embodied cognition, event semantics, lexical-semantic, modality, representation, semantic control, semantic feature, simulation, semantic distance, semantic dimension). We discuss potential benefits and pitfalls (e.g., implicit bias, prescriptiveness) of these efforts to specify a common nomenclature that other researchers might index in specifying their own theoretical perspectives (e.g., They said X, but I mean Y).</p>","PeriodicalId":20763,"journal":{"name":"Psychonomic Bulletin & Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142133524","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The relationship of speech perception and speech production: It's complicated. 语音感知与语音生成之间的关系:这很复杂
IF 3.2 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2024-09-03 DOI: 10.3758/s13423-024-02561-w
Melissa M Baese-Berk, Efthymia C Kapnoula, Arthur G Samuel

A widely held belief is that speech perception and speech production are tightly linked, with each modality available to help with learning in the other modality. This positive relationship is often summarized as perception and production being "two sides of the same coin." There are, indeed, many situations that have shown this mutually supportive relationship. However, there is a growing body of research showing very different results, with the modalities operating independently, or even in opposition to each other. We review the now-sizeable literature demonstrating the negative effect that speech production can have on perceptual learning of speech, at multiple levels (particularly at the lexical and sublexical levels). By comparing the situations that show this pattern with ones in which more positive interactions occur, we provide an initial account of why the different outcomes are found, identifying factors that lead to either positive or negative effects of production on perception. The review clarifies the complex relationship that exists between the two modalities: They are indeed linked, but their relationship is more complicated than is suggested by the notion that they are two sides of the same coin.

人们普遍认为,语音感知和语音生成是紧密联系在一起的,每一种模式都可以帮助另一种模式的学习。这种积极的关系通常被概括为感知和语音生成是 "一枚硬币的两面"。的确,有许多情况表明了这种相互支持的关系。然而,也有越来越多的研究显示了截然不同的结果,这两种模式各自独立运行,甚至相互对立。我们回顾了现已有相当规模的文献,这些文献表明,在多个层面(尤其是词法和次词法层面)上,语音生成可能对语音的感知学习产生负面影响。通过比较显示出这种模式的情况和发生更多积极互动的情况,我们初步解释了为什么会出现不同的结果,找出了导致语音制作对感知产生积极或消极影响的因素。这篇综述阐明了两种模式之间存在的复杂关系:它们之间确实存在联系,但其关系比 "它们是一枚硬币的两面 "这一概念所暗示的更为复杂。
{"title":"The relationship of speech perception and speech production: It's complicated.","authors":"Melissa M Baese-Berk, Efthymia C Kapnoula, Arthur G Samuel","doi":"10.3758/s13423-024-02561-w","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-024-02561-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A widely held belief is that speech perception and speech production are tightly linked, with each modality available to help with learning in the other modality. This positive relationship is often summarized as perception and production being \"two sides of the same coin.\" There are, indeed, many situations that have shown this mutually supportive relationship. However, there is a growing body of research showing very different results, with the modalities operating independently, or even in opposition to each other. We review the now-sizeable literature demonstrating the negative effect that speech production can have on perceptual learning of speech, at multiple levels (particularly at the lexical and sublexical levels). By comparing the situations that show this pattern with ones in which more positive interactions occur, we provide an initial account of why the different outcomes are found, identifying factors that lead to either positive or negative effects of production on perception. The review clarifies the complex relationship that exists between the two modalities: They are indeed linked, but their relationship is more complicated than is suggested by the notion that they are two sides of the same coin.</p>","PeriodicalId":20763,"journal":{"name":"Psychonomic Bulletin & Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142126517","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1