Pub Date : 2025-11-18DOI: 10.1017/S0033291725102626
Marianne Källström, Ida E M Pedersen, Daniel Ventus, Annika Gunst, Martin Lagerström, Sabina Nickull, Patrick Jern
Background: Sexual minorities have continuously been found to experience poorer mental health compared to the general population, despite promising changes in attitudes and legislation throughout the 21st century in many Western countries. The present study is one of the first to assess group-level changes over time in mental health among sexual minorities compared to their heterosexual counterparts.
Methods: We used four waves of a Finnish population-based survey spanning 16 years (2006-2022) to compare heterosexual and sexual minority adults on depression and anxiety symptoms, alcohol use, and sexual distress.
Results: Sexual minority individuals reported more depression and anxiety symptoms, sexual distress, and alcohol use relative to their heterosexual counterparts at all time points. There were no group differences in the direction or rate of change in group means from 2006 to 2022. Depression and anxiety symptoms showed equally large increases, and alcohol use showed equally large decreases among both heterosexual and sexual minority participants.
Conclusions: Contrary to our expectations based on minority stress theory, differences in mental health between sexual minority and heterosexual individuals persist despite changes in the sociolegal status of sexual minorities during the first two decades of the 21st century. Our findings align with the increasing general trend in anxiety and depression symptoms, which seems to affect the whole population regardless of sexual orientation. We conclude that the effect of legislative societal improvements seems to be small, and the mental health gap between sexual minority and heterosexual adults is likely maintained by factors not included in our study.
{"title":"Mental health in sexual minorities: Change over time in a Finnish population-based sample.","authors":"Marianne Källström, Ida E M Pedersen, Daniel Ventus, Annika Gunst, Martin Lagerström, Sabina Nickull, Patrick Jern","doi":"10.1017/S0033291725102626","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291725102626","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sexual minorities have continuously been found to experience poorer mental health compared to the general population, despite promising changes in attitudes and legislation throughout the 21st century in many Western countries. The present study is one of the first to assess group-level changes over time in mental health among sexual minorities compared to their heterosexual counterparts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used four waves of a Finnish population-based survey spanning 16 years (2006-2022) to compare heterosexual and sexual minority adults on depression and anxiety symptoms, alcohol use, and sexual distress.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sexual minority individuals reported more depression and anxiety symptoms, sexual distress, and alcohol use relative to their heterosexual counterparts at all time points. There were no group differences in the direction or rate of change in group means from 2006 to 2022. Depression and anxiety symptoms showed equally large increases, and alcohol use showed equally large decreases among both heterosexual and sexual minority participants.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Contrary to our expectations based on minority stress theory, differences in mental health between sexual minority and heterosexual individuals persist despite changes in the sociolegal status of sexual minorities during the first two decades of the 21st century. Our findings align with the increasing general trend in anxiety and depression symptoms, which seems to affect the whole population regardless of sexual orientation. We conclude that the effect of legislative societal improvements seems to be small, and the mental health gap between sexual minority and heterosexual adults is likely maintained by factors not included in our study.</p>","PeriodicalId":20891,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Medicine","volume":"55 ","pages":"e351"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2025-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145542095","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Mitochondrial dysfunction has been implicated in the pathogenesis of major depressive disorder (MDD); however, the causal contributions of specific mitochondrial genes across regulatory layers remain unclear.
Methods: We integrated genome-wide association study summary statistics from the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium and FinnGen with quantitative-trait-locus (QTL) datasets for DNA methylation, gene expression (eQTL), and protein abundance. Mitochondrial genes were annotated using the MitoCarta3.0 database. Summary-based Mendelian randomization and Bayesian colocalization were applied to assess causal relationships, with colocalization determined by the posterior probability of a shared causal variant (PPH4), and the false discovery rate used for multiple-testing correction. Brain-specific effects were evaluated using Genotype-Tissue Expression eQTL data. Prioritized genes were ranked based on cross-omics consistency and replication evidence.
Results: Five mitochondrial genes were prioritized. TDRKH showed consistent associations across methylation, transcription, and protein levels, with hypermethylation at cg24503712 linked to reduced expression and a lower risk of MDD (Tier 1). METAP1D (Tier 2) demonstrated protective effects at both the transcript and protein levels. LONP1, FIS1, and SCP2 (Tier 3) exhibited consistent but complex regulatory patterns. Several signals were replicated in brain tissues, including TDRKH in the caudate and METAP1D in the cortex.
Conclusions: This study provides multi-omics evidence for the causal involvement of mitochondrial genes in MDD. TDRKH and METAP1D emerged as key candidates, offering promising targets for future mechanistic research and therapeutic development.
{"title":"Decoding nuclear-encoded mitochondrial genes in major depressive disorder: A multi-omics perspective.","authors":"Jing Liao, Xianyan Wang, Gaokun Dai, Huilei Xu, Fuchao Zhang, Xiang Yuan, Qiuxia Feng","doi":"10.1017/S0033291725102559","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291725102559","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mitochondrial dysfunction has been implicated in the pathogenesis of major depressive disorder (MDD); however, the causal contributions of specific mitochondrial genes across regulatory layers remain unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We integrated genome-wide association study summary statistics from the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium and FinnGen with quantitative-trait-locus (QTL) datasets for DNA methylation, gene expression (eQTL), and protein abundance. Mitochondrial genes were annotated using the MitoCarta3.0 database. Summary-based Mendelian randomization and Bayesian colocalization were applied to assess causal relationships, with colocalization determined by the posterior probability of a shared causal variant (PPH4), and the false discovery rate used for multiple-testing correction. Brain-specific effects were evaluated using Genotype-Tissue Expression eQTL data. Prioritized genes were ranked based on cross-omics consistency and replication evidence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five mitochondrial genes were prioritized. <i>TDRKH</i> showed consistent associations across methylation, transcription, and protein levels, with hypermethylation at cg24503712 linked to reduced expression and a lower risk of MDD (Tier 1). <i>METAP1D</i> (Tier 2) demonstrated protective effects at both the transcript and protein levels. <i>LONP1</i>, <i>FIS1</i>, and <i>SCP2</i> (Tier 3) exhibited consistent but complex regulatory patterns. Several signals were replicated in brain tissues, including <i>TDRKH</i> in the caudate and <i>METAP1D</i> in the cortex.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides multi-omics evidence for the causal involvement of mitochondrial genes in MDD. <i>TDRKH</i> and <i>METAP1D</i> emerged as key candidates, offering promising targets for future mechanistic research and therapeutic development.</p>","PeriodicalId":20891,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Medicine","volume":"55 ","pages":"e350"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2025-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145542098","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-17DOI: 10.1017/S0033291725102523
Angad Sahni, Anna-Lena Frey, Ciara McCabe
Background: Anhedonia and depression symptoms have been linked to potential deficits in reward learning. However, how anhedonia impacts the ability to adjust and learn about the effort required to obtain rewards remains unclear.
Methods: We examined young people (N = 155, 16-25 years) with a range of depression and anhedonia symptoms using a probabilistic instrumental reward and effort learning task. Participants were asked to learn which options to choose to maximize reward or minimize effort for reward. We compared the exerted effort (button pressing speed) for high (puppy images) vs low (dog images) rewards and collected subjective reports of "liking," "wanting," and "willingness to exert effort." Computational models were fit to the learning data and estimated parameter values were correlated with depression and anhedonia symptoms.
Results: As depression symptoms and consummatory anhedonia increased, reward liking decreased, and as anticipatory anhedonia increased, liking, wanting, and willingness to exert effort for reward decreased.Participants exerted more effort for high rewards than for low rewards, but anticipatory anhedonia diminished this difference.Higher consummatory anhedonia was associated with poorer reward and effort learning, and with increased temperature parameter values for both learning types, indicating a higher tendency to make exploratory choices. Higher depression symptoms were associated with lower reward learning accuracy.
Conclusion: We provide novel evidence that anhedonia is associated with difficulties in modulating effort as a function of reward value and with the underexploitation of low effort and high reward options. We suggest that addressing these impairments could be a novel target for intervention in anhedonic young people.
{"title":"Anhedonia is associated with computational impairments in reward and effort learning in young people with depression symptoms.","authors":"Angad Sahni, Anna-Lena Frey, Ciara McCabe","doi":"10.1017/S0033291725102523","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291725102523","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Anhedonia and depression symptoms have been linked to potential deficits in reward learning. However, how anhedonia impacts the ability to adjust and learn about the effort required to obtain rewards remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We examined young people (<i>N</i> = 155, 16-25 years) with a range of depression and anhedonia symptoms using a probabilistic instrumental reward and effort learning task. Participants were asked to learn which options to choose to maximize reward or minimize effort for reward. We compared the exerted effort (button pressing speed) for high (puppy images) vs low (dog images) rewards and collected subjective reports of \"liking,\" \"wanting,\" and \"willingness to exert effort.\" Computational models were fit to the learning data and estimated parameter values were correlated with depression and anhedonia symptoms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>As depression symptoms and consummatory anhedonia increased, reward liking decreased, and as anticipatory anhedonia increased, liking, wanting, and willingness to exert effort for reward decreased.Participants exerted more effort for high rewards than for low rewards, but anticipatory anhedonia diminished this difference.Higher consummatory anhedonia was associated with poorer reward and effort learning, and with increased temperature parameter values for both learning types, indicating a higher tendency to make exploratory choices. Higher depression symptoms were associated with lower reward learning accuracy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We provide novel evidence that anhedonia is associated with difficulties in modulating effort as a function of reward value and with the underexploitation of low effort and high reward options. We suggest that addressing these impairments could be a novel target for intervention in anhedonic young people.</p>","PeriodicalId":20891,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Medicine","volume":"55 ","pages":"e347"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2025-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145534696","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-17DOI: 10.1017/S0033291725102298
Jonathan E Handelzalts, Susan Ayers, Rebecca Webb, Georgina Constantinou, Grace Lucas, Christopher Grollman, Shay Ohayon, Natalia Awad Sirhan, Kathleen Baird, Márcia Baldisserotto, Ramish Batool, Shahida Batool, Rafael A Caparros-Gonzalez, Genesis Chorwe-Sungani, Andri Christoforou, Soledad Coo, Raquel Costa, Pelin Dikmen-Yildiz, Barbora Ďuríčeková, Bohdana Dušová, Violeta Enea, Susan Garthus-Niegel, Hanna Grundström, Oye Gureje, Eleni Hadjigeorgiou, Silje Marie Haga, Antje Horsch, Chiara Ionio, Gabija Jarašiūnaitė-Fedosejeva, Julie Jomeen, Maria Kazmierczak, Joan Lalor, Maja Milosavljevic, Ursula Nagle, Sandra Nakić Radoš, Katri Nieminen, Bibilola Damilola Oladeji, Flavia Osório, Paulina Pawlicka, Yoav Peled, Tiago Miguel Pinto, Valentine Rattaz, Olga Riklikienė, Julia Schellong, Valgerður Lísa Sigurðardóttir, Narenda Singh Thagunna, Mariza Theme Filha, Zuzana Škodová, Petra Stebelová, Tjasa Stepisnik Perdih, Robert Stewart, Emma Marie Swift, Kristiina Uriko, Zahir Vally, Milica Vezmar, Haya H Zedan, Maja Žutić
Background: Childbirth-related post-traumatic stress disorder (CB-PTSD) is an underrecognized condition with consequences for mothers and infants. This study aimed to determine risk factors for CB-PTSD symptoms across countries within a stress-diathesis framework, focusing on antenatal, birth-related, and postpartum predictors.
Methods: The INTERSECT cross-sectional survey (April 2021-January 2024) included 11,302 women at 6-12 weeks postpartum. The study was carried out across maternity services in 31 countries. Outcomes were CB-PTSD diagnosis, symptom severity, and perceived traumatic birth, assessed with the City Birth Trauma Scale. Multiple risk factors were assessed, including preexisting vulnerability, pregnancy, birth, and infant-related factors. All models were adjusted for country-level variation as a random effect.
Results: Models explained substantial variance across all outcomes (conditional R2 = 0.53-0.58). Negative birth experience was the strongest predictor (e.g. odds ratio [OR] = 0.82, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.80-0.84 for diagnosis). Ongoing maternal complications predicted both CB-PTSD diagnosis and symptoms (e.g. OR = 1.61, 95% CI = 1.41-1.84), and major infant complications were associated with CB-PTSD diagnosis (OR = 1.63, 95% CI = 1.29-2.07). Reports of perceived danger to self or infant (criterion A) were linked to higher CB-PTSD symptoms and traumatic birth ratings (e.g., β =0.25, 95% CI = 0.21-0.29). Other predictors reached significance but showed small effects.
Conclusions: Findings support a stress-diathesis framework, showing that while pre-existing vulnerabilities contribute, birth-related stressors exert the strongest influence. Trauma-informed maternity care should prioritize these factors, with attention to women's appraisals of birth.
背景:分娩相关创伤后应激障碍(CB-PTSD)是一种未被充分认识的疾病,对母亲和婴儿都有影响。本研究旨在在压力素质框架内确定各国CB-PTSD症状的危险因素,重点关注产前、分娩相关和产后预测因素。方法:INTERSECT横断面调查(2021年4月- 2024年1月)包括11,302名产后6-12周的妇女。这项研究是在31个国家的产科服务机构进行的。结果是CB-PTSD的诊断,症状严重程度和感知创伤性分娩,用城市分娩创伤量表评估。评估了多种危险因素,包括先前存在的易感性、妊娠、分娩和婴儿相关因素。所有模型都根据国家水平的变化作为随机效应进行了调整。结果:模型解释了所有结果的显著差异(条件R2 = 0.53-0.58)。负面出生经历是最强的预测因子(如诊断的比值比[OR] = 0.82, 95%可信区间[CI] = 0.80-0.84)。持续的母体并发症预测了CB-PTSD的诊断和症状(例如OR = 1.61, 95% CI = 1.41-1.84),而主要的婴儿并发症与CB-PTSD的诊断相关(OR = 1.63, 95% CI = 1.29-2.07)。感知到对自己或婴儿的危险(标准A)的报告与较高的CB-PTSD症状和创伤性分娩评分相关(例如,β =0.25, 95% CI = 0.21-0.29)。其他预测指标达到显著性,但影响不大。结论:研究结果支持压力-素质框架,表明虽然先前存在的脆弱性起作用,但与出生相关的压力源发挥最大的影响。创伤知情的产科护理应优先考虑这些因素,并注意妇女对分娩的评价。
{"title":"Cross-national risk factors for childbirth-related PTSD: Findings from the INTERSECT study.","authors":"Jonathan E Handelzalts, Susan Ayers, Rebecca Webb, Georgina Constantinou, Grace Lucas, Christopher Grollman, Shay Ohayon, Natalia Awad Sirhan, Kathleen Baird, Márcia Baldisserotto, Ramish Batool, Shahida Batool, Rafael A Caparros-Gonzalez, Genesis Chorwe-Sungani, Andri Christoforou, Soledad Coo, Raquel Costa, Pelin Dikmen-Yildiz, Barbora Ďuríčeková, Bohdana Dušová, Violeta Enea, Susan Garthus-Niegel, Hanna Grundström, Oye Gureje, Eleni Hadjigeorgiou, Silje Marie Haga, Antje Horsch, Chiara Ionio, Gabija Jarašiūnaitė-Fedosejeva, Julie Jomeen, Maria Kazmierczak, Joan Lalor, Maja Milosavljevic, Ursula Nagle, Sandra Nakić Radoš, Katri Nieminen, Bibilola Damilola Oladeji, Flavia Osório, Paulina Pawlicka, Yoav Peled, Tiago Miguel Pinto, Valentine Rattaz, Olga Riklikienė, Julia Schellong, Valgerður Lísa Sigurðardóttir, Narenda Singh Thagunna, Mariza Theme Filha, Zuzana Škodová, Petra Stebelová, Tjasa Stepisnik Perdih, Robert Stewart, Emma Marie Swift, Kristiina Uriko, Zahir Vally, Milica Vezmar, Haya H Zedan, Maja Žutić","doi":"10.1017/S0033291725102298","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291725102298","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Childbirth-related post-traumatic stress disorder (CB-PTSD) is an underrecognized condition with consequences for mothers and infants. This study aimed to determine risk factors for CB-PTSD symptoms across countries within a stress-diathesis framework, focusing on antenatal, birth-related, and postpartum predictors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The INTERSECT cross-sectional survey (April 2021-January 2024) included 11,302 women at 6-12 weeks postpartum. The study was carried out across maternity services in 31 countries. Outcomes were CB-PTSD diagnosis, symptom severity, and perceived traumatic birth, assessed with the City Birth Trauma Scale. Multiple risk factors were assessed, including preexisting vulnerability, pregnancy, birth, and infant-related factors. All models were adjusted for country-level variation as a random effect.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Models explained substantial variance across all outcomes (conditional <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.53-0.58). Negative birth experience was the strongest predictor (e.g. odds ratio [OR] = 0.82, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.80-0.84 for diagnosis). Ongoing maternal complications predicted both CB-PTSD diagnosis and symptoms (e.g. OR = 1.61, 95% CI = 1.41-1.84), and major infant complications were associated with CB-PTSD diagnosis (OR = 1.63, 95% CI = 1.29-2.07). Reports of perceived danger to self or infant (criterion A) were linked to higher CB-PTSD symptoms and traumatic birth ratings (e.g., <i>β</i> =0.25, 95% CI = 0.21-0.29). Other predictors reached significance but showed small effects.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings support a stress-diathesis framework, showing that while pre-existing vulnerabilities contribute, birth-related stressors exert the strongest influence. Trauma-informed maternity care should prioritize these factors, with attention to women's appraisals of birth.</p>","PeriodicalId":20891,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Medicine","volume":"55 ","pages":"e349"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2025-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145534722","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-17DOI: 10.1017/S0033291725102262
Cristina García-Huércano, Sonia Conejo-Cerón, Carmela Martínez-Vispo, Juan Ángel Bellón, Alberto Rodríguez-Morejón, Olaya Tamayo-Morales, Patricia Moreno-Peral
The high incidence of new cases of anxiety disorders highlights the need for scalable preventive interventions, which can be achieved through information and communication technologies. To our knowledge, no meta-analysis has been conducted to evaluate purely digital preventive interventions for anxiety in all types of populations. The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of digital interventions for the prevention of anxiety disorders. Systematic searches were conducted in six electronic databases (PubMed, PsycINFO, EMBASE, Web of Science, OpenGrey, and CENTRAL) from inception to December 12, 2024. Inclusion criteria for the studies were as follows: (1) randomized controlled trials (RCTs), (2) psychological or psychoeducational digital interventions to prevent anxiety, and (3) all types of populations without anxiety at baseline of the study. A total of 15 studies (19 comparisons; 6093 participants) were included in the systematic review. One study was identified as an outlier and was therefore excluded from the meta-analysis. The pooled analysis showed a small effect in favor of preventive interventions among non-anxious and varied populations (standardized mean difference = -0.32, 95% confidence interval: -0.44 to -0.20; p < 0.001). Sensitivity analyses supported the robustness of this finding. We found no evidence of publication bias. Heterogeneity was high, however, a meta-regression that included one variable (country, the Netherlands) explained 100% of the variance. All RCTs, except two, had a high risk of bias, and the quality of the evidence, according to Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation, was very low. There is a need to develop and evaluate new digital preventive interventions with a rigorous methodology.
焦虑症新发病例的高发生率突出表明需要采取可扩展的预防性干预措施,这可通过信息和通信技术实现。据我们所知,还没有进行过荟萃分析来评估所有类型人群中对焦虑的纯数字预防干预措施。本研究的目的是评估数字干预对预防焦虑症的有效性。系统检索了6个电子数据库(PubMed, PsycINFO, EMBASE, Web of Science, OpenGrey, CENTRAL)从成立到2024年12月12日。研究的纳入标准如下:(1)随机对照试验(rct);(2)预防焦虑的心理或心理教育数字干预;(3)在研究基线时无焦虑的所有类型人群。系统评价共纳入15项研究(19项比较,6093名受试者)。一项研究被确定为异常值,因此被排除在meta分析之外。合并分析显示,在非焦虑人群和不同人群中,预防性干预的效果较小(标准化平均差异= -0.32,95%置信区间:-0.44至-0.20;p < 0.001)。敏感性分析支持这一发现的稳健性。我们没有发现发表偏倚的证据。异质性很高,然而,包含一个变量(国家,荷兰)的元回归解释了100%的方差。除两项外,所有随机对照试验均存在高偏倚风险,且根据推荐评估、发展和评价分级,证据质量非常低。有必要以严格的方法开发和评估新的数字预防干预措施。
{"title":"Effectiveness of digital psychological and psychoeducational interventions to prevent anxiety: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.","authors":"Cristina García-Huércano, Sonia Conejo-Cerón, Carmela Martínez-Vispo, Juan Ángel Bellón, Alberto Rodríguez-Morejón, Olaya Tamayo-Morales, Patricia Moreno-Peral","doi":"10.1017/S0033291725102262","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291725102262","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The high incidence of new cases of anxiety disorders highlights the need for scalable preventive interventions, which can be achieved through information and communication technologies. To our knowledge, no meta-analysis has been conducted to evaluate purely digital preventive interventions for anxiety in all types of populations. The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of digital interventions for the prevention of anxiety disorders. Systematic searches were conducted in six electronic databases (PubMed, PsycINFO, EMBASE, Web of Science, OpenGrey, and CENTRAL) from inception to December 12, 2024. Inclusion criteria for the studies were as follows: (1) randomized controlled trials (RCTs), (2) psychological or psychoeducational digital interventions to prevent anxiety, and (3) all types of populations without anxiety at baseline of the study. A total of 15 studies (19 comparisons; 6093 participants) were included in the systematic review. One study was identified as an outlier and was therefore excluded from the meta-analysis. The pooled analysis showed a small effect in favor of preventive interventions among non-anxious and varied populations (standardized mean difference = -0.32, 95% confidence interval: -0.44 to -0.20; p < 0.001). Sensitivity analyses supported the robustness of this finding. We found no evidence of publication bias. Heterogeneity was high, however, a meta-regression that included one variable (country, the Netherlands) explained 100% of the variance. All RCTs, except two, had a high risk of bias, and the quality of the evidence, according to Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation, was very low. There is a need to develop and evaluate new digital preventive interventions with a rigorous methodology.</p>","PeriodicalId":20891,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Medicine","volume":"55 ","pages":"e345"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2025-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145534720","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-14DOI: 10.1017/S0033291725102390
Yaqing Gao, Bernd Taschler, Najaf Amin, Cornelia van Duijn, David J Hunter, Anya Topiwala, Thomas J Littlejohns
Background: Neuroticism, a personality trait linked to both cardiovascular and psychiatric disorders, has been associated with cognitive decline and increased dementia risk, though the underlying neural mechanisms remain unclear. Mapping its relationship with brain structure could provide valuable insights into neural pathways and targets for early intervention.
Methods: We examined brain-wide associations between neuroticism and structural neuroimaging metrics derived from T1-, T2-weighted, and diffusion MRI in 36,901 dementia-free UK Biobank participants. Bonferroni-significant associations underwent bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization to evaluate the evidence for a causal relationship. Given that neuroticism is generally stable across adulthood and challenging to modify, we assessed whether these associations were mediated by health conditions (depression, anxiety, hypertension, ischemic heart disease [IHD], and diabetes) that are both consequences of neuroticism and known risk factors for dementia, and also modifiable through widely available and efficacious therapeutic interventions.
Results: Higher neuroticism was found to be associated with reduced grey matter volumes in the frontal and limbic regions, as well as widespread differences in white matter microstructure, particularly in thalamic radiations. Genetic analyses supported a potential causal effect of neuroticism on increased diffusivity in thalamic radiations. Hypertension mediated the associations between neuroticism and both grey and white matter measures, while depression and anxiety primarily mediated associations with white matter microstructure. Contributions from IHD and diabetes were minimal.
Conclusions: Neuroticism is linked to widespread structural brain differences that contribute to poorer brain health, and targeting vascular and mental health may help mitigate its impact.
{"title":"Association between neuroticism and brain-wide structural outcomes: Mediation by vascular and mental conditions.","authors":"Yaqing Gao, Bernd Taschler, Najaf Amin, Cornelia van Duijn, David J Hunter, Anya Topiwala, Thomas J Littlejohns","doi":"10.1017/S0033291725102390","DOIUrl":"10.1017/S0033291725102390","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Neuroticism, a personality trait linked to both cardiovascular and psychiatric disorders, has been associated with cognitive decline and increased dementia risk, though the underlying neural mechanisms remain unclear. Mapping its relationship with brain structure could provide valuable insights into neural pathways and targets for early intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We examined brain-wide associations between neuroticism and structural neuroimaging metrics derived from T1-, T2-weighted, and diffusion MRI in 36,901 dementia-free UK Biobank participants. Bonferroni-significant associations underwent bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization to evaluate the evidence for a causal relationship. Given that neuroticism is generally stable across adulthood and challenging to modify, we assessed whether these associations were mediated by health conditions (depression, anxiety, hypertension, ischemic heart disease [IHD], and diabetes) that are both consequences of neuroticism and known risk factors for dementia, and also modifiable through widely available and efficacious therapeutic interventions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Higher neuroticism was found to be associated with reduced grey matter volumes in the frontal and limbic regions, as well as widespread differences in white matter microstructure, particularly in thalamic radiations. Genetic analyses supported a potential causal effect of neuroticism on increased diffusivity in thalamic radiations. Hypertension mediated the associations between neuroticism and both grey and white matter measures, while depression and anxiety primarily mediated associations with white matter microstructure. Contributions from IHD and diabetes were minimal.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Neuroticism is linked to widespread structural brain differences that contribute to poorer brain health, and targeting vascular and mental health may help mitigate its impact.</p>","PeriodicalId":20891,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Medicine","volume":"55 ","pages":"e343"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2025-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7618729/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145513684","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-14DOI: 10.1017/S0033291725102407
Alireza Ehteshami, Irwin D Waldman
Background: Given substantial comorbidity among, and considerable heterogeneity within, psychiatric diagnoses, researchers have suggested alternative systems for classifying psychopathology. The Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP) is a recently proposed framework for understanding mental disorders based on how symptoms and diagnoses tend to cluster across individuals. While the model is grounded in existing research and supported by recent meta-analytic evidence, its structure has not yet been directly tested using large, representative clinical datasets. In this study, we used electronic health record (EHR) data to examine the overall organization of mental disorders as proposed by HiTOP, with the goal of informing future research on biological and environmental risk factors as well as important life outcomes.
Methods: Data were drawn from the All of Us Research Program, a landmark nationwide US biobank initiative designed to advance population-scale health research, and included participants' psychiatric diagnoses and sociodemographic correlates as documented in their EHRs. A total of 127,963 participants and 39 primary diagnoses were identified. We analyzed patterns of co-occurrence among psychiatric diagnoses to identify broader psychopathology dimensions, assess the overall structure of mental disorders, and clarify the placement of conditions that have been inconsistently categorized in past research. Several competing dimensional models were compared based on their statistical fit and complementary assessments of factor strength, specificity, and reproducibility.
Results: A model identifying six broad and correlated dimensions - Fear, Distress, Externalizing, Substance Use, Thought Problems, and Neurodevelopmental Disorders - provided the best fit to the data. This structure was highly consistent across analyses and showed strong split-half replicability and meaningful associations with relevant clinical and demographic characteristics.
Conclusions: These findings support a 6-factor model of psychopathology that broadly resembles major dimensions in the HiTOP framework. By addressing key gaps in the literature, this study advances our understanding of the structure and correlates of mental disorders. The results offer a foundation for more nuanced investigations into the etiology, progression, and treatment of mental health conditions.
背景:鉴于精神病学诊断中存在大量的共病和相当大的异质性,研究人员提出了精神病理学分类的替代系统。精神病理学层次分类法(HiTOP)是最近提出的一个框架,用于理解精神障碍,该框架基于症状和诊断如何倾向于在个体中聚集。虽然该模型以现有研究为基础,并得到最近荟萃分析证据的支持,但其结构尚未使用大型代表性临床数据集进行直接测试。在这项研究中,我们使用电子健康记录(EHR)数据来检查HiTOP提出的精神障碍的总体组织,目的是为未来的生物和环境风险因素以及重要的生活结局的研究提供信息。方法:数据来自“我们所有人研究计划”(All of Us Research Program),这是一项具有里程碑意义的全国性美国生物银行计划,旨在推进人口规模的健康研究),包括参与者在电子病历中记录的精神病学诊断和社会人口学相关因素。共有127,963名参与者和39名原发性诊断被确定。我们分析了精神病学诊断中共发生的模式,以确定更广泛的精神病理学维度,评估精神障碍的整体结构,并澄清过去研究中不一致分类的条件的位置。几个相互竞争的维度模型根据其统计拟合和互补评估的因素强度,特异性和可重复性进行比较。结果:一个模型确定了六个广泛且相关的维度——恐惧、痛苦、外化、物质使用、思维问题和神经发育障碍——提供了最适合数据的模型。该结构在分析中高度一致,显示出强大的半分裂可复制性,并与相关临床和人口统计学特征有意义的关联。结论:这些发现支持精神病理学的六因素模型,该模型与HiTOP框架中的主要维度大致相似。通过解决文献中的关键空白,本研究促进了我们对精神障碍的结构和相关因素的理解。这些结果为更细致地研究精神健康状况的病因、进展和治疗提供了基础。
{"title":"The broad structure of psychopathology in the All of Us Research Program.","authors":"Alireza Ehteshami, Irwin D Waldman","doi":"10.1017/S0033291725102407","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291725102407","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Given substantial comorbidity among, and considerable heterogeneity within, psychiatric diagnoses, researchers have suggested alternative systems for classifying psychopathology. The Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP) is a recently proposed framework for understanding mental disorders based on how symptoms and diagnoses tend to cluster across individuals. While the model is grounded in existing research and supported by recent meta-analytic evidence, its structure has not yet been directly tested using large, representative clinical datasets. In this study, we used electronic health record (EHR) data to examine the overall organization of mental disorders as proposed by HiTOP, with the goal of informing future research on biological and environmental risk factors as well as important life outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were drawn from the <i>All of Us</i> Research Program, a landmark nationwide US biobank initiative designed to advance population-scale health research, and included participants' psychiatric diagnoses and sociodemographic correlates as documented in their EHRs. A total of 127,963 participants and 39 primary diagnoses were identified. We analyzed patterns of co-occurrence among psychiatric diagnoses to identify broader psychopathology dimensions, assess the overall structure of mental disorders, and clarify the placement of conditions that have been inconsistently categorized in past research. Several competing dimensional models were compared based on their statistical fit and complementary assessments of factor strength, specificity, and reproducibility.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A model identifying six broad and correlated dimensions - Fear, Distress, Externalizing, Substance Use, Thought Problems, and Neurodevelopmental Disorders - provided the best fit to the data. This structure was highly consistent across analyses and showed strong split-half replicability and meaningful associations with relevant clinical and demographic characteristics.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings support a 6-factor model of psychopathology that broadly resembles major dimensions in the HiTOP framework. By addressing key gaps in the literature, this study advances our understanding of the structure and correlates of mental disorders. The results offer a foundation for more nuanced investigations into the etiology, progression, and treatment of mental health conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":20891,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Medicine","volume":"55 ","pages":"e344"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2025-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145513721","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-14DOI: 10.1017/S0033291725102201
Seda Arslan, Merve Kaşıkçı, Osman Dağ, Didenur Şahin-Çevik, Işık Batuhan Çakmak, Evangelos Vassos, Martijn van den Heuvel, Timothea Toulopoulou
Background: Psychotic-like experiences (PLEs) are considered a subclinical component of psychosis continuum. Studies indicate that PLEs arise from multimodal factors, yet research comprehensively examining these factors together remains scarce. Using a large youth sample, we present the first model that simultaneously examines multimodal factors related to PLEs. As a secondary aim, we evaluate the model's ability to explain psychosis in an external validation cohort that included individuals experiencing psychosis.
Methods: After applying variable selection including generalized estimating equations, correlation filtering, Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator model to 741 variables (i.e., environmental factors, cognitive appraisals, clinical variables, cognitive functioning, and structural brain connectome measures), obtained PLEs predictors (N = 27) and covariates (i.e., age, sex, IQ) were included in the classification model based on Elastic Net algorithm for predicting high/low PLEs in 396 healthy participants aged 14-24 (Mage = 19.72 ± 2.5). We externally validated PLE-related predictors in a clinical sample comprising first-episode psychosis patients (n = 19), their siblings (n = 20), and healthy controls (n = 19).
Results: Eleven factors, including environmental and cognitive appraisals, along with 16 structural network properties spanning frontal, temporal, occipital, and parietal regions, were identified as important predictors of PLEs. The model's performance was moderate in predicting low versus high PLEs (accuracy = 75%, AUC = 0.750). Specificity was high (84.2%) in distinguishing siblings from patients.
Conclusions: Multimodal features, including environmental burden, cognitive schemas, and brain network alterations, predict PLEs and partially generalize to clinical psychosis. These variables may reflect intermediate phenotypes across the psychosis spectrum, offering insights into both vulnerability and resilience.
{"title":"Multimodal prediction of psychotic-like experiences using elastic net modeling: external validation in a clinical sample.","authors":"Seda Arslan, Merve Kaşıkçı, Osman Dağ, Didenur Şahin-Çevik, Işık Batuhan Çakmak, Evangelos Vassos, Martijn van den Heuvel, Timothea Toulopoulou","doi":"10.1017/S0033291725102201","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291725102201","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Psychotic-like experiences (PLEs) are considered a subclinical component of psychosis continuum. Studies indicate that PLEs arise from multimodal factors, yet research comprehensively examining these factors together remains scarce. Using a large youth sample, we present the first model that simultaneously examines multimodal factors related to PLEs. As a secondary aim, we evaluate the model's ability to explain psychosis in an external validation cohort that included individuals experiencing psychosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>After applying variable selection including generalized estimating equations, correlation filtering, Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator model to 741 variables (i.e., environmental factors, cognitive appraisals, clinical variables, cognitive functioning, and structural brain connectome measures), obtained PLEs predictors (<i>N</i> = 27) and covariates (i.e., age, sex, IQ) were included in the classification model based on Elastic Net algorithm for predicting high/low PLEs in 396 healthy participants aged 14-24 (<i>M<sub>age</sub></i> = 19.72 ± 2.5). We externally validated PLE-related predictors in a clinical sample comprising first-episode psychosis patients (<i>n</i> = 19), their siblings (<i>n</i> = 20), and healthy controls (<i>n</i> = 19).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eleven factors, including environmental and cognitive appraisals, along with 16 structural network properties spanning frontal, temporal, occipital, and parietal regions, were identified as important predictors of PLEs. The model's performance was moderate in predicting low versus high PLEs (accuracy = 75%, AUC = 0.750). Specificity was high (84.2%) in distinguishing siblings from patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Multimodal features, including environmental burden, cognitive schemas, and brain network alterations, predict PLEs and partially generalize to clinical psychosis. These variables may reflect intermediate phenotypes across the psychosis spectrum, offering insights into both vulnerability and resilience.</p>","PeriodicalId":20891,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Medicine","volume":"55 ","pages":"e346"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2025-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145513698","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-12DOI: 10.1017/S0033291725101712
Camilo J Ruggero, Katherine G Jonas, Cheyanne Busso, Wenxuan Lian, Anna R Docherty, Andrey A Shabalin, Gabrielle A Carlson, Evelyn J Bromet, Roman Kotov
Background: The nosology of mania has long been a conundrum. Prior studies have alternately concluded that it is an internalizing disorder, a thought disorder, or a unique condition. Unfortunately, nearly all existing studies assessed symptoms cross-sectionally. This is problematic for syndromes that follow a more episodic course, such as mania. Here, we test whether including a history of episodes, not simply current symptoms, can help resolve the placement of mania in the meta-structure of psychopathology.
Methods: First-admission patients with psychosis from the Suffolk County Mental Health Project (N = 337) were followed across 20 years. Internalizing, thought disorder, and mania symptoms were assessed at year 20, whereas corresponding episodes (i.e. depressive, psychotic, and manic) were assessed across three intervals spanning the previous 20 years. We tested five models to determine whether mania (current and past) loaded onto the internalizing factor, the thought disorder factor, or an independent factor. A final model was validated against established markers of bipolar disorder.
Results: For depression and psychosis, current and past markers were congruent in loading onto internalizing and thought disorder factors, respectively. However, current and past markers of mania diverged: current mania was most strongly related to the thought disorder dimension, whereas past mania formed an independent factor. Classic correlates of mania - including family history, genetic risk, and neuropsychological function - were associated only with the history of mania dimension.
Conclusions: Including illness course in structural models of psychopathology suggests that mania is distinguished from internalizing and thought disorder factors, whereas assessments of current symptoms place it with psychosis. These findings require independent validation, but if replicated, they would support a separate spectrum of mania defined by the occurrence of episodes across the lifetime.
{"title":"Where is mania in the meta-structure of psychopathology?","authors":"Camilo J Ruggero, Katherine G Jonas, Cheyanne Busso, Wenxuan Lian, Anna R Docherty, Andrey A Shabalin, Gabrielle A Carlson, Evelyn J Bromet, Roman Kotov","doi":"10.1017/S0033291725101712","DOIUrl":"10.1017/S0033291725101712","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The nosology of mania has long been a conundrum. Prior studies have alternately concluded that it is an internalizing disorder, a thought disorder, or a unique condition. Unfortunately, nearly all existing studies assessed symptoms cross-sectionally. This is problematic for syndromes that follow a more episodic course, such as mania. Here, we test whether including a history of episodes, not simply current symptoms, can help resolve the placement of mania in the meta-structure of psychopathology.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>First-admission patients with psychosis from the Suffolk County Mental Health Project (<i>N</i> = 337) were followed across 20 years. Internalizing, thought disorder, and mania symptoms were assessed at year 20, whereas corresponding episodes (i.e. depressive, psychotic, and manic) were assessed across three intervals spanning the previous 20 years. We tested five models to determine whether mania (current and past) loaded onto the internalizing factor, the thought disorder factor, or an independent factor. A final model was validated against established markers of bipolar disorder.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For depression and psychosis, current and past markers were congruent in loading onto internalizing and thought disorder factors, respectively. However, current and past markers of mania diverged: current mania was most strongly related to the thought disorder dimension, whereas past mania formed an independent factor. Classic correlates of mania - including family history, genetic risk, and neuropsychological function - were associated only with the history of mania dimension.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Including illness course in structural models of psychopathology suggests that mania is distinguished from internalizing and thought disorder factors, whereas assessments of current symptoms place it with psychosis. These findings require independent validation, but if replicated, they would support a separate spectrum of mania defined by the occurrence of episodes across the lifetime.</p>","PeriodicalId":20891,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Medicine","volume":"55 ","pages":"e342"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2025-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145496528","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-12DOI: 10.1017/S0033291725102171
Qian Li, Haoran Li, Fenghua Long, Yufei Chen, Yitian Wang, Beisheng Yang, Melissa P DelBello, Robert K McNamara, Fei Li, Qiyong Gong
Background: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a heterogeneous with underlying mechanisms that are insufficiently studied. We aimed to identify functional connectivity (FC)-based subtypes of MDD and investigate their biological mechanisms.
Methods: Consensus clustering of FC patterns was applied to a population of 829 MDD patients from the REST-Meta-MDD database, with validity assessed across multiple dimensions, including atlas replication, cross-validated classification, and drug-naïve subgroup analysis. Regression models were used to quantify FC alterations in each MDD subgroup compared with 770 healthy controls, and to analyze spatial associations between FC alterations and publicly available gene transcriptomic and neurotransmitter receptor/transporter density databases.
Results: Two stable MDD subtypes emerged: hypoconnectivity (n = 527) and hyperconnectivity (n = 299), which had both shared and distinct regions with remarkable FC alterations (i.e. epicenters) in the default mode network.There were several common enriched genes (e.g. axon/brain development, synaptic transmission/organization, etc.) related to FC alterations in both subtypes. However, glial cell and neuronal differentiation genes were specifically enriched in the hypoconnectivity and hyperconnectivity subtypes, respectively.Both subtypes showed spatial associations between FC alterations and serotonin receptor/transporter density. In the hypoconnectivity subtype, FC alterations correlated with GABA and acetylcholine receptor densities, while norepinephrine transporter and glutamate receptor densities were linked to the hyperconnectivity subtype.
Conclusions: Our findings suggested the presence of two neuroimaging subtypes of MDD characterized by hypoconnectivity or hyperconnectivity, demonstrating robust reproducibility. The two subtypes had both shared and distinct genetic mechanisms and neurotransmitter receptor/transporter profiles, suggesting potential clinical implications for this heterogeneous disorder.
{"title":"Heterogeneity of brain functional connectivity, transcriptome, and neurotransmitter profiles in major depressive disorder.","authors":"Qian Li, Haoran Li, Fenghua Long, Yufei Chen, Yitian Wang, Beisheng Yang, Melissa P DelBello, Robert K McNamara, Fei Li, Qiyong Gong","doi":"10.1017/S0033291725102171","DOIUrl":"10.1017/S0033291725102171","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a heterogeneous with underlying mechanisms that are insufficiently studied. We aimed to identify functional connectivity (FC)-based subtypes of MDD and investigate their biological mechanisms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consensus clustering of FC patterns was applied to a population of 829 MDD patients from the REST-Meta-MDD database, with validity assessed across multiple dimensions, including atlas replication, cross-validated classification, and drug-naïve subgroup analysis. Regression models were used to quantify FC alterations in each MDD subgroup compared with 770 healthy controls, and to analyze spatial associations between FC alterations and publicly available gene transcriptomic and neurotransmitter receptor/transporter density databases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two stable MDD subtypes emerged: hypoconnectivity (<i>n</i> = 527) and hyperconnectivity (<i>n</i> = 299), which had both shared and distinct regions with remarkable FC alterations (i.e. epicenters) in the default mode network.There were several common enriched genes (e.g. axon/brain development, synaptic transmission/organization, etc.) related to FC alterations in both subtypes. However, glial cell and neuronal differentiation genes were specifically enriched in the hypoconnectivity and hyperconnectivity subtypes, respectively.Both subtypes showed spatial associations between FC alterations and serotonin receptor/transporter density. In the hypoconnectivity subtype, FC alterations correlated with GABA and acetylcholine receptor densities, while norepinephrine transporter and glutamate receptor densities were linked to the hyperconnectivity subtype.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggested the presence of two neuroimaging subtypes of MDD characterized by hypoconnectivity or hyperconnectivity, demonstrating robust reproducibility. The two subtypes had both shared and distinct genetic mechanisms and neurotransmitter receptor/transporter profiles, suggesting potential clinical implications for this heterogeneous disorder.</p>","PeriodicalId":20891,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Medicine","volume":"55 ","pages":"e341"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2025-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145496493","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}