Pub Date : 2024-12-06DOI: 10.1017/S0033291724002058
Isabelle Austin-Zimmerman, Edoardo Spinazzola, Diego Quattrone, Beatrice Wu-Choi, Giulia Trotta, Zhikun Li, Emma Johnson, Alexander L Richards, Tom P Freeman, Giada Tripoli, Charlotte Gayer-Anderson, Victoria Rodriguez, Hannah E Jongsma, Laura Ferraro, Caterina La Cascia, Sarah Tosato, Ilaria Tarricone, Domenico Berardi, Elena Bonora, Marco Seri, Giuseppe D'Andrea, Andrei Szöke, Celso Arango, Julio Bobes, Julio Sanjuán, Jose Luis Santos, Manuel Arrojo, Eva Velthorst, Miguel Bernardo, Cristina Marta Del-Ben, Paulo Rossi Menezes, Jean-Paul Selten, Peter B Jones, James B Kirkbride, Bart P F Rutten, Andrea Tortelli, Pierre-Michel Llorca, Lieuwe de Haan, Simona Stilo, Daniele La Barbera, Antonio Lasalvia, Franck Schurnhoff, Baptiste Pignon, Jim van Os, Michael Lynskey, Craig Morgan, Michael O' Donovan, Cathryn M Lewis, Pak C Sham, Robin M Murray, Evangelos Vassos, Marta Di Forti
Background: The association between cannabis and psychosis is established, but the role of underlying genetics is unclear. We used data from the EU-GEI case-control study and UK Biobank to examine the independent and combined effect of heavy cannabis use and schizophrenia polygenic risk score (PRS) on risk for psychosis.
Methods: Genome-wide association study summary statistics from the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium and the Genomic Psychiatry Cohort were used to calculate schizophrenia and cannabis use disorder (CUD) PRS for 1098 participants from the EU-GEI study and 143600 from the UK Biobank. Both datasets had information on cannabis use.
Results: In both samples, schizophrenia PRS and cannabis use independently increased risk of psychosis. Schizophrenia PRS was not associated with patterns of cannabis use in the EU-GEI cases or controls or UK Biobank cases. It was associated with lifetime and daily cannabis use among UK Biobank participants without psychosis, but the effect was substantially reduced when CUD PRS was included in the model. In the EU-GEI sample, regular users of high-potency cannabis had the highest odds of being a case independently of schizophrenia PRS (OR daily use high-potency cannabis adjusted for PRS = 5.09, 95% CI 3.08-8.43, p = 3.21 × 10-10). We found no evidence of interaction between schizophrenia PRS and patterns of cannabis use.
Conclusions: Regular use of high-potency cannabis remains a strong predictor of psychotic disorder independently of schizophrenia PRS, which does not seem to be associated with heavy cannabis use. These are important findings at a time of increasing use and potency of cannabis worldwide.
背景:大麻和精神病之间的联系是建立的,但潜在遗传学的作用尚不清楚。我们使用EU-GEI病例对照研究和UK Biobank的数据来检查重度大麻使用和精神分裂症多基因风险评分(PRS)对精神病风险的独立和联合影响。方法:使用来自精神病学基因组学联盟和基因组精神病学队列的全基因组关联研究汇总统计数据,计算来自EU-GEI研究的1098名参与者和来自英国生物银行的143600名参与者的精神分裂症和大麻使用障碍(CUD) PRS。这两个数据集都有关于大麻使用的信息。结果:在两个样本中,精神分裂症PRS和大麻使用独立增加精神病的风险。在EU-GEI病例或对照或UK Biobank病例中,精神分裂症PRS与大麻使用模式无关。在没有精神病的英国生物银行参与者中,它与终生和每日大麻使用有关,但当CUD PRS被纳入模型时,效果大大降低。在EU-GEI样本中,经常使用强效大麻的人成为精神分裂症PRS独立病例的几率最高(OR每日使用强效大麻调整为PRS = 5.09, 95% CI 3.08-8.43, p = 3.21 × 10-10)。我们没有发现精神分裂症PRS和大麻使用模式之间相互作用的证据。结论:经常使用强效大麻仍然是精神障碍的一个强有力的预测因素,独立于精神分裂症PRS,这似乎与大量使用大麻无关。在世界范围内大麻的使用和效力不断增加的时候,这些都是重要的发现。
{"title":"The impact of schizophrenia genetic load and heavy cannabis use on the risk of psychotic disorder in the EU-GEI case-control and UK Biobank studies.","authors":"Isabelle Austin-Zimmerman, Edoardo Spinazzola, Diego Quattrone, Beatrice Wu-Choi, Giulia Trotta, Zhikun Li, Emma Johnson, Alexander L Richards, Tom P Freeman, Giada Tripoli, Charlotte Gayer-Anderson, Victoria Rodriguez, Hannah E Jongsma, Laura Ferraro, Caterina La Cascia, Sarah Tosato, Ilaria Tarricone, Domenico Berardi, Elena Bonora, Marco Seri, Giuseppe D'Andrea, Andrei Szöke, Celso Arango, Julio Bobes, Julio Sanjuán, Jose Luis Santos, Manuel Arrojo, Eva Velthorst, Miguel Bernardo, Cristina Marta Del-Ben, Paulo Rossi Menezes, Jean-Paul Selten, Peter B Jones, James B Kirkbride, Bart P F Rutten, Andrea Tortelli, Pierre-Michel Llorca, Lieuwe de Haan, Simona Stilo, Daniele La Barbera, Antonio Lasalvia, Franck Schurnhoff, Baptiste Pignon, Jim van Os, Michael Lynskey, Craig Morgan, Michael O' Donovan, Cathryn M Lewis, Pak C Sham, Robin M Murray, Evangelos Vassos, Marta Di Forti","doi":"10.1017/S0033291724002058","DOIUrl":"10.1017/S0033291724002058","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The association between cannabis and psychosis is established, but the role of underlying genetics is unclear. We used data from the EU-GEI case-control study and UK Biobank to examine the independent and combined effect of heavy cannabis use and schizophrenia polygenic risk score (PRS) on risk for psychosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Genome-wide association study summary statistics from the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium and the Genomic Psychiatry Cohort were used to calculate schizophrenia and cannabis use disorder (CUD) PRS for 1098 participants from the EU-GEI study and 143600 from the UK Biobank. Both datasets had information on cannabis use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In both samples, schizophrenia PRS and cannabis use independently increased risk of psychosis. Schizophrenia PRS was not associated with patterns of cannabis use in the EU-GEI cases or controls or UK Biobank cases. It was associated with lifetime and daily cannabis use among UK Biobank participants without psychosis, but the effect was substantially reduced when CUD PRS was included in the model. In the EU-GEI sample, regular users of high-potency cannabis had the highest odds of being a case independently of schizophrenia PRS (OR daily use high-potency cannabis adjusted for PRS = 5.09, 95% CI 3.08-8.43, <i>p</i> = 3.21 × 10<sup>-10</sup>). We found no evidence of interaction between schizophrenia PRS and patterns of cannabis use.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Regular use of high-potency cannabis remains a strong predictor of psychotic disorder independently of schizophrenia PRS, which does not seem to be associated with heavy cannabis use. These are important findings at a time of increasing use and potency of cannabis worldwide.</p>","PeriodicalId":20891,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11650186/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142786515","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-06DOI: 10.1017/S0033291724002794
Dvora Shmulewitz, Maor Daniel Levitin, Vera Skvirsky, Merav Vider, Roi Eliashar, Mario Mikulincer, Shaul Lev-Ran
Background: Among those with common mental health disorders (e.g. mood, anxiety, and stress disorders), comorbidity of substance and other addictive disorders is prevalent. To simplify the seemingly complex relationships underlying such comorbidity, methods that include multiple measures to distill which specific addictions are uniquely associated with specific mental health disorders rather than due to the co-occurrence of other related addictions or mental health disorders can be used.
Methods: In a general population sample of Jewish adults in Israel (N = 4002), network analysis methods were used to create partial correlation networks of continuous measures of problematic substance (non-medical use of alcohol, tobacco, cannabis, and prescription sedatives, stimulants, and opioid painkillers) and behavioral (gambling, electronic gaming, sexual behavior, pornography, internet, social media, and smartphone) addictions and common mental health problems (depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder [PTSD]), adjusted for all variables in the model.
Results: Strongest associations were observed within these clusters: (1) PTSD, anxiety, and depression; (2) problematic substance use and gambling; (3) technology-based addictive behaviors; and (4) problematic sexual behavior and pornography. In terms of comorbidity, the strongest unique associations were observed for PTSD and problematic technology-based behaviors (social media, smartphone), and sedatives and stimulants use; depression and problematic technology-based behaviors (gaming, internet) and sedatives and cannabis use; and anxiety and problematic smartphone use.
Conclusions: Network analysis isolated unique relationships underlying the observed comorbidity between common mental health problems and addictions, such as associations between mental health problems and technology-based behaviors, which is informative for more focused interventions.
{"title":"Comorbidity of problematic substance use and other addictive behaviors and anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder: a network analysis.","authors":"Dvora Shmulewitz, Maor Daniel Levitin, Vera Skvirsky, Merav Vider, Roi Eliashar, Mario Mikulincer, Shaul Lev-Ran","doi":"10.1017/S0033291724002794","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291724002794","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Among those with common mental health disorders (e.g. mood, anxiety, and stress disorders), comorbidity of substance and other addictive disorders is prevalent. To simplify the seemingly complex relationships underlying such comorbidity, methods that include multiple measures to distill which specific addictions are uniquely associated with specific mental health disorders rather than due to the co-occurrence of other related addictions or mental health disorders can be used.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a general population sample of Jewish adults in Israel (<i>N</i> = 4002), network analysis methods were used to create partial correlation networks of continuous measures of problematic substance (non-medical use of alcohol, tobacco, cannabis, and prescription sedatives, stimulants, and opioid painkillers) and behavioral (gambling, electronic gaming, sexual behavior, pornography, internet, social media, and smartphone) addictions and common mental health problems (depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder [PTSD]), adjusted for all variables in the model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Strongest associations were observed within these clusters: (1) PTSD, anxiety, and depression; (2) problematic substance use and gambling; (3) technology-based addictive behaviors; and (4) problematic sexual behavior and pornography. In terms of comorbidity, the strongest unique associations were observed for PTSD and problematic technology-based behaviors (social media, smartphone), and sedatives and stimulants use; depression and problematic technology-based behaviors (gaming, internet) and sedatives and cannabis use; and anxiety and problematic smartphone use.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Network analysis isolated unique relationships underlying the observed comorbidity between common mental health problems and addictions, such as associations between mental health problems and technology-based behaviors, which is informative for more focused interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":20891,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142786508","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-04DOI: 10.1017/S0033291724002770
Kelly L Klump, Megan E Mikhail, Carolina Anaya, Pamela K Keel, Kristen M Culbert, Cheryl L Sisk, Alexander Johnson, Steven Boker, Micheal C Neale, S Alexandra Burt
Background: Past studies indicate daily increases in estrogen across the menstrual cycle protect against binge-eating (BE) phenotypes (e.g. emotional eating), whereas increases in progesterone enhance risk. Two previous studies from our laboratory suggest these associations could be due to differential genomic effects of estrogen and progesterone. However, these prior studies were unable to directly model effects of daily changes in hormones on etiologic risk, instead relying on menstrual cycle phase or mean hormone levels. The current study used newly modified twin models to examine, for the first time, the effects of daily changes in estradiol and progesterone on genetic/environmental influences on emotional eating in our archival twin sample assessed across 45 consecutive days.
Methods: Participants included 468 female twins from the Michigan State University Twin Registry. Daily emotional eating was assessed with the Dutch Eating Behavior Questionnaire, and daily saliva samples were assayed for ovarian hormone levels. Modified genotype × environment interaction models examined daily changes in genetic/environmental effects across hormone levels.
Results: Findings revealed differential effects of daily changes in hormones on etiologic risk, with increasing genetic influences across progesterone levels, and increasing shared environmental influences at the highest estradiol levels. Results were consistent across primary analyses examining all study days and sensitivity analyses within menstrual cycle phases.
Conclusions: Findings are significant in being the first to identify changes in etiologic risk for BE symptoms across daily hormone levels and highlighting novel mechanisms (e.g. hormone threshold effects, regulation of conserved genes) that may contribute to the etiology of BE.
{"title":"Daily estradiol and progesterone levels moderate genetic and environmental influences on emotional eating across 45 consecutive days in female twins.","authors":"Kelly L Klump, Megan E Mikhail, Carolina Anaya, Pamela K Keel, Kristen M Culbert, Cheryl L Sisk, Alexander Johnson, Steven Boker, Micheal C Neale, S Alexandra Burt","doi":"10.1017/S0033291724002770","DOIUrl":"10.1017/S0033291724002770","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Past studies indicate daily increases in estrogen across the menstrual cycle protect against binge-eating (BE) phenotypes (e.g. emotional eating), whereas increases in progesterone enhance risk. Two previous studies from our laboratory suggest these associations could be due to differential genomic effects of estrogen and progesterone. However, these prior studies were unable to directly model effects of daily changes in hormones on etiologic risk, instead relying on menstrual cycle phase or mean hormone levels. The current study used newly modified twin models to examine, for the first time, the effects of daily changes in estradiol and progesterone on genetic/environmental influences on emotional eating in our archival twin sample assessed across 45 consecutive days.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants included 468 female twins from the Michigan State University Twin Registry. Daily emotional eating was assessed with the Dutch Eating Behavior Questionnaire, and daily saliva samples were assayed for ovarian hormone levels. Modified genotype × environment interaction models examined daily changes in genetic/environmental effects across hormone levels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Findings revealed differential effects of daily changes in hormones on etiologic risk, with increasing genetic influences across progesterone levels, and increasing shared environmental influences at the highest estradiol levels. Results were consistent across primary analyses examining all study days and sensitivity analyses within menstrual cycle phases.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings are significant in being the first to identify changes in etiologic risk for BE symptoms across daily hormone levels and highlighting novel mechanisms (e.g. hormone threshold effects, regulation of conserved genes) that may contribute to the etiology of BE.</p>","PeriodicalId":20891,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11650152/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142771433","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-03DOI: 10.1017/S0033291724002733
Yinong Liu, Lizu Lai, Sabine Wilhelm, Katharine A Phillips, Yunxiao Guo, Jennifer L Greenberg, Zhihong Ren
This meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis (TSA) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the psychological treatment of body dysmorphic disorder (BDD) was conducted to evaluate the intervention effects and robustness of the evidence. This study included 15 RCTs up until 15 June 2024, with 905 participants. Results showed significant improvements in BDD symptoms (g = -0.97), depression (g = -0.51), anxiety (g = -0.72), insight/delusion (g = -0.57), psychosocial functioning (g = 0.45), and quality of life (g = 0.44), with effects sustained from 1 to 6 months follow-up. RCTs with a waitlist/inactive control reported larger effect sizes for post-intervention BDD symptoms compared to those with a placebo/active control group. In addition, studies with low risk of bias demonstrate larger effect sizes for post-intervention psychosocial functioning compared to studies with some concerns. Notably, the presence of exposure and response prevention in the treatment, as well as the mode of delivery (face-to-face or digital), did not have a significant impact on the intervention outcomes. Females exhibited greater effect sizes in post-intervention BDD symptoms and psychosocial functioning than males. With increasing age, the effect size for insight/delusion symptoms diminished. Longer session duration was associated with larger effect sizes for BDD symptoms, depression at post-treatment, and depression at follow-up. TSA indicated robust evidence for depression at post-treatment and BDD symptoms, while the remaining outcome variables did not meet the desired level of evidence. In conclusion, this study underscores the effectiveness of psychological treatments in reducing BDD symptoms and improving related outcomes, highlighting the need for further research to confirm the impact of these therapies on other outcomes.
{"title":"The efficacy of psychological treatments on body dysmorphic disorder: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials.","authors":"Yinong Liu, Lizu Lai, Sabine Wilhelm, Katharine A Phillips, Yunxiao Guo, Jennifer L Greenberg, Zhihong Ren","doi":"10.1017/S0033291724002733","DOIUrl":"10.1017/S0033291724002733","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis (TSA) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the psychological treatment of body dysmorphic disorder (BDD) was conducted to evaluate the intervention effects and robustness of the evidence. This study included 15 RCTs up until 15 June 2024, with 905 participants. Results showed significant improvements in BDD symptoms (<i>g</i> = -0.97), depression (<i>g</i> = -0.51), anxiety (<i>g</i> = -0.72), insight/delusion (<i>g</i> = -0.57), psychosocial functioning (<i>g</i> = 0.45), and quality of life (<i>g</i> = 0.44), with effects sustained from 1 to 6 months follow-up. RCTs with a waitlist/inactive control reported larger effect sizes for post-intervention BDD symptoms compared to those with a placebo/active control group. In addition, studies with low risk of bias demonstrate larger effect sizes for post-intervention psychosocial functioning compared to studies with some concerns. Notably, the presence of exposure and response prevention in the treatment, as well as the mode of delivery (face-to-face or digital), did not have a significant impact on the intervention outcomes. Females exhibited greater effect sizes in post-intervention BDD symptoms and psychosocial functioning than males. With increasing age, the effect size for insight/delusion symptoms diminished. Longer session duration was associated with larger effect sizes for BDD symptoms, depression at post-treatment, and depression at follow-up. TSA indicated robust evidence for depression at post-treatment and BDD symptoms, while the remaining outcome variables did not meet the desired level of evidence. In conclusion, this study underscores the effectiveness of psychological treatments in reducing BDD symptoms and improving related outcomes, highlighting the need for further research to confirm the impact of these therapies on other outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":20891,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2024-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11650169/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142771753","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-03DOI: 10.1017/S0033291724002836
Steffen Moritz, Jakob Scheunemann, Lena Jelinek, Danielle Penney, Stella Schmotz, Luca Hoyer, Dominik Grudzień, Adrianna Aleksandrowicz
{"title":"Prevalence of body-focused repetitive behaviors in a diverse population sample - rates across age, gender, race and education - CORRIGENDUM.","authors":"Steffen Moritz, Jakob Scheunemann, Lena Jelinek, Danielle Penney, Stella Schmotz, Luca Hoyer, Dominik Grudzień, Adrianna Aleksandrowicz","doi":"10.1017/S0033291724002836","DOIUrl":"10.1017/S0033291724002836","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":20891,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2024-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11650160/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142771743","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-02DOI: 10.1017/S0033291724002721
Anouk Verveen, Fajar Agung Nugroho, Ioan Gabriel Bucur, Elke Wynberg, Hugo D G van Willigen, Udi Davidovich, Anja Lok, Eric P Moll van Charante, Godelieve J de Bree, Menno D de Jong, Neeltje Kootstra, Tom Claassen, Marien I de Jonge, Tom Heskes, Maria Prins, Hans Knoop, Pythia T Nieuwkerk
Background: Severe fatigue and cognitive complaints are frequently reported after SARS-CoV-2 infection and may be accompanied by depressive symptoms and/or limitations in physical functioning. The long-term sequelae of COVID-19 may be influenced by biomedical, psychological, and social factors, the interplay of which is largely understudied over time. We aimed to investigate how the interplay of these factors contribute to the persistence of symptoms after COVID-19.
Methods: RECoVERED, a prospective cohort study in Amsterdam, the Netherlands, enrolled participants aged⩾16 years after SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis. We used a structural network analysis to assess relationships between biomedical (initial COVID-19 severity, inflammation markers), psychological (illness perceptions, coping, resilience), and social factors (loneliness, negative life events) and persistent symptoms 24 months after initial disease (severe fatigue, difficulty concentrating, depressive symptoms and limitations in physical functioning). Causal discovery, an explorative data-driven approach testing all possible associations and retaining the most likely model, was performed.
Results: Data from 235/303 participants (77.6%) who completed the month 24 study visit were analysed. The structural model revealed associations between the putative factors and outcomes. The outcomes clustered together with severe fatigue as its central point. Loneliness, fear avoidance in response to symptoms, and illness perceptions were directly linked to the outcomes. Biological (inflammatory markers) and clinical (severity of initial illness) variables were connected to the outcomes only via psychological or social variables.
Conclusions: Our findings support a model where biomedical, psychological, and social factors contribute to the development of long-term sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection.
{"title":"Long-term sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 two years following infection: exploring the interplay of biological, psychological, and social factors.","authors":"Anouk Verveen, Fajar Agung Nugroho, Ioan Gabriel Bucur, Elke Wynberg, Hugo D G van Willigen, Udi Davidovich, Anja Lok, Eric P Moll van Charante, Godelieve J de Bree, Menno D de Jong, Neeltje Kootstra, Tom Claassen, Marien I de Jonge, Tom Heskes, Maria Prins, Hans Knoop, Pythia T Nieuwkerk","doi":"10.1017/S0033291724002721","DOIUrl":"10.1017/S0033291724002721","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Severe fatigue and cognitive complaints are frequently reported after SARS-CoV-2 infection and may be accompanied by depressive symptoms and/or limitations in physical functioning. The long-term sequelae of COVID-19 may be influenced by biomedical, psychological, and social factors, the interplay of which is largely understudied over time. We aimed to investigate how the interplay of these factors contribute to the persistence of symptoms after COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>RECoVERED, a prospective cohort study in Amsterdam, the Netherlands, enrolled participants aged⩾16 years after SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis. We used a structural network analysis to assess relationships between biomedical (initial COVID-19 severity, inflammation markers), psychological (illness perceptions, coping, resilience), and social factors (loneliness, negative life events) and persistent symptoms 24 months after initial disease (severe fatigue, difficulty concentrating, depressive symptoms and limitations in physical functioning). Causal discovery, an explorative data-driven approach testing all possible associations and retaining the most likely model, was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 235/303 participants (77.6%) who completed the month 24 study visit were analysed. The structural model revealed associations between the putative factors and outcomes. The outcomes clustered together with severe fatigue as its central point. Loneliness, fear avoidance in response to symptoms, and illness perceptions were directly linked to the outcomes. Biological (inflammatory markers) and clinical (severity of initial illness) variables were connected to the outcomes only via psychological or social variables.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings support a model where biomedical, psychological, and social factors contribute to the development of long-term sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection.</p>","PeriodicalId":20891,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11650182/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142771737","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-02DOI: 10.1017/S003329172400268X
Lauren M Hutson, Rotem Dan, Aliza R Brown, Shiba M Esfand, Valerie Ruberto, Emily Johns, Kaylee E Null, Kyoko Ohashi, Alaptagin Khan, Fei Du, Martin H Teicher, Diego A Pizzagalli
Background: Childhood sexual abuse (CSA) and emotional maltreatment are salient risk factors for the development of major depressive disorder (MDD) in women. However, the type- and timing-specific effects of emotional maltreatment experienced during adolescence on future depressive symptomatology in women with CSA have not been explored. The goal of this study was to fill this gap.
Methods: In total, 203 women (ages 20-32) with current depressive symptoms and CSA (MDD/CSA), remitted depressive symptoms and CSA (rMDD/CSA), and current depressive symptoms without CSA (MDD/no CSA) were recruited from the community and completed self-report measures. Depressive symptoms were assessed using the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) and a detailed maltreatment history was collected using the Maltreatment and Abuse Chronology of Exposure (MACE). Differences in maltreatment exposure characteristics, including multiplicity and severity of maltreatment, as well as the chronologies of emotional maltreatment subtypes were compared among groups. A random forest machine-learning algorithm was utilized to assess the impact of exposure to emotional maltreatment subtypes at specific ages on current depressive symptoms.
Results: MDD/CSA women reported greater prevalence and severity of emotional maltreatment relative to rMDD/CSA and MDD/no CSA women [F(2,196) = 9.33, p < 0.001], specifically from ages 12 to 18. The strongest predictor of current depressive symptoms was parental verbal abuse at age 18 for both MDD/CSA women (variable importance [VI] = 1.08, p = 0.006) and MDD/no CSA women (VI = 0.68, p = 0.004).
Conclusions: Targeting emotional maltreatment during late adolescence might prove beneficial for future intervention efforts for MDD following CSA.
背景:儿童期性虐待(CSA)和情绪虐待是女性发生重度抑郁症(MDD)的重要危险因素。然而,青少年时期经历的情感虐待对CSA女性未来抑郁症状的类型和时间特异性影响尚未被探讨。这项研究的目的是填补这一空白。方法:从社区招募203名有当前抑郁症状和CSA (MDD/CSA)、抑郁症状和CSA缓解(rMDD/CSA)和当前抑郁症状无CSA (MDD/无CSA)的女性(年龄20-32岁),并完成自我报告测量。使用贝克抑郁量表(BDI-II)评估抑郁症状,并使用虐待和虐待暴露年表(MACE)收集详细的虐待史。比较各组间虐待暴露特征的差异,包括虐待的多样性和严重程度,以及情绪虐待亚型的年表。使用随机森林机器学习算法来评估特定年龄暴露于情感虐待亚型对当前抑郁症状的影响。结果:与rMDD/CSA和MDD/no CSA女性相比,MDD/CSA女性报告的情绪虐待患病率和严重程度更高[F(2196) = 9.33, p < 0.001],特别是在12至18岁之间。MDD/CSA女性当前抑郁症状的最强预测因子是18岁时父母的言语虐待(变量重要性[VI] = 1.08, p = 0.006)和MDD/无CSA女性(VI = 0.68, p = 0.004)。结论:针对青春期后期的情绪虐待可能对CSA后MDD的未来干预工作有益。
{"title":"Childhood sexual abuse and lifetime depressive symptoms: the importance of type and timing of childhood emotional maltreatment.","authors":"Lauren M Hutson, Rotem Dan, Aliza R Brown, Shiba M Esfand, Valerie Ruberto, Emily Johns, Kaylee E Null, Kyoko Ohashi, Alaptagin Khan, Fei Du, Martin H Teicher, Diego A Pizzagalli","doi":"10.1017/S003329172400268X","DOIUrl":"10.1017/S003329172400268X","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Childhood sexual abuse (CSA) and emotional maltreatment are salient risk factors for the development of major depressive disorder (MDD) in women. However, the type- and timing-specific effects of emotional maltreatment experienced during adolescence on future depressive symptomatology in women with CSA have not been explored. The goal of this study was to fill this gap.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In total, 203 women (ages 20-32) with current depressive symptoms and CSA (MDD/CSA), remitted depressive symptoms and CSA (rMDD/CSA), and current depressive symptoms without CSA (MDD/no CSA) were recruited from the community and completed self-report measures. Depressive symptoms were assessed using the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) and a detailed maltreatment history was collected using the Maltreatment and Abuse Chronology of Exposure (MACE). Differences in maltreatment exposure characteristics, including multiplicity and severity of maltreatment, as well as the chronologies of emotional maltreatment subtypes were compared among groups. A random forest machine-learning algorithm was utilized to assess the impact of exposure to emotional maltreatment subtypes at specific ages on current depressive symptoms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MDD/CSA women reported greater prevalence and severity of emotional maltreatment relative to rMDD/CSA and MDD/no CSA women [<i>F</i><sub>(2,196)</sub> = 9.33, <i>p</i> < 0.001], specifically from ages 12 to 18. The strongest predictor of current depressive symptoms was parental verbal abuse at age 18 for both MDD/CSA women (variable importance [VI] = 1.08, <i>p</i> = 0.006) and MDD/no CSA women (VI = 0.68, <i>p</i> = 0.004).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Targeting emotional maltreatment during late adolescence might prove beneficial for future intervention efforts for MDD following CSA.</p>","PeriodicalId":20891,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11650171/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142771844","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-02DOI: 10.1017/S0033291724002538
Delphine Yeh, Qin He, Emma Krebs, Anton Iftimovici, Gilles Martinez, Julie Bourgin-Duchesnay, Fayçal Mouaffak, Charlotte Danset-Alexandre, Marie de Gasquet, Célia Jantac, Narjes Bendjemaa, Boris Chaumette, Marie-Odile Krebs, Linda Scoriels
Background: Cognitive impairment constitutes a prevailing issue in the schizophrenia spectrum, severely impacting patients' functional outcomes. A global cognitive score, sensitive to the stages of the spectrum, would benefit the exploration of potential factors involved in the cognitive decline.
Methods: First, we performed principal component analysis on cognitive scores from 768 individuals across the schizophrenia spectrum, including first-degree relatives of patients, individuals at ultra-high risk, who had a first-episode psychosis, and chronic schizophrenia patients, alongside 124 healthy controls. The analysis provided 10 g-factors as global cognitive scores, validated through correlations with intelligence quotient and assessed for their sensitivity to the stages on the spectrum using analyses of variance. Second, using the g-factors, we explored potential mechanisms underlying cognitive impairment in the schizophrenia spectrum using correlations with sociodemographic, clinical, and developmental data, and linear regressions with genotypic data, pooled through meta-analyses.
Results: The g-factors were highly correlated with intelligence quotient and with each other, confirming their validity. They presented significant differences between subgroups along the schizophrenia spectrum. They were positively correlated with educational attainment and the polygenic risk score (PRS) for cognitive performance, and negatively correlated with general psychopathology of schizophrenia, neurodevelopmental load, and the PRS for schizophrenia.
Conclusions: The g-factors appeared as valid estimators of global cognition, enabling discerning cognitive states within the schizophrenia spectrum. Educational attainment and genetics related to cognitive performance may have a positive influence on cognitive functioning, while general psychopathology of schizophrenia, neurodevelopmental load, and genetic liability to schizophrenia may have an adverse impact.
{"title":"Cognitive impairment in the schizophrenia spectrum: exploring the relationships of the g-factor with sociodemography, psychopathology, neurodevelopment, and genetics.","authors":"Delphine Yeh, Qin He, Emma Krebs, Anton Iftimovici, Gilles Martinez, Julie Bourgin-Duchesnay, Fayçal Mouaffak, Charlotte Danset-Alexandre, Marie de Gasquet, Célia Jantac, Narjes Bendjemaa, Boris Chaumette, Marie-Odile Krebs, Linda Scoriels","doi":"10.1017/S0033291724002538","DOIUrl":"10.1017/S0033291724002538","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cognitive impairment constitutes a prevailing issue in the schizophrenia spectrum, severely impacting patients' functional outcomes. A global cognitive score, sensitive to the stages of the spectrum, would benefit the exploration of potential factors involved in the cognitive decline.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>First, we performed principal component analysis on cognitive scores from 768 individuals across the schizophrenia spectrum, including first-degree relatives of patients, individuals at ultra-high risk, who had a first-episode psychosis, and chronic schizophrenia patients, alongside 124 healthy controls. The analysis provided 10 g-factors as global cognitive scores, validated through correlations with intelligence quotient and assessed for their sensitivity to the stages on the spectrum using analyses of variance. Second, using the g-factors, we explored potential mechanisms underlying cognitive impairment in the schizophrenia spectrum using correlations with sociodemographic, clinical, and developmental data, and linear regressions with genotypic data, pooled through meta-analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The g-factors were highly correlated with intelligence quotient and with each other, confirming their validity. They presented significant differences between subgroups along the schizophrenia spectrum. They were positively correlated with educational attainment and the polygenic risk score (PRS) for cognitive performance, and negatively correlated with general psychopathology of schizophrenia, neurodevelopmental load, and the PRS for schizophrenia.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The g-factors appeared as valid estimators of global cognition, enabling discerning cognitive states within the schizophrenia spectrum. Educational attainment and genetics related to cognitive performance may have a positive influence on cognitive functioning, while general psychopathology of schizophrenia, neurodevelopmental load, and genetic liability to schizophrenia may have an adverse impact.</p>","PeriodicalId":20891,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11650192/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142771472","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-02DOI: 10.1017/S0033291724003052
Alfredo L Sklar, Sayna Matinrazm, Annika Esseku, Fran López-Caballero, Mark Curtis, Dylan Seebold, Natasha Torrence, Vanessa Fishel, Brian A Coffman, Dean F Salisbury
Background: Executive control over low-level information processing is impaired proximal to psychosis onset with evidence of recovery over the first year of illness. However, previous studies demonstrating diminished perceptual modulation via attention are complicated by simultaneously impaired perceptual responses. The present study examined the early auditory gamma-band response (EAGBR), a marker of early cortical processing that appears preserved in first-episode psychosis (FEP), and its modulation by attention in a longitudinal FEP sample.
Methods: Magnetoencephalography was recorded from 25 FEP and 32 healthy controls (HC) during active and passive listening conditions in an auditory oddball task at baseline and follow-up (4-12 months) sessions. EAGBR inter-trial phase coherence (ITPC) and evoked power were measured from responses to standard tones. Symptoms were assessed using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS).
Results: There was no group difference in EAGBR power or ITPC. While EAGBR ITPC increased with attention in HC, this modulation was impaired among FEP. Diminished EAGBR modulation in FEP persisted at longitudinal follow-up. However, among FEP, recovery of EAGBR modulation was associated with reduced PANSS negative scores.
Conclusion: FEP exhibit impaired executive control over the flow of information at the earliest stages of sensory processing within auditory cortex. In contrast to previous work, this deficit was observed despite an intact measure of sensory processing, mitigating potential confounds. Recovery of sensory gain modulation over time was associated with reductions in negative symptoms, highlighting a source of potential resiliency against some of the most debilitating and treatment refractory symptoms in early psychosis.
{"title":"Longitudinal evaluation of the early auditory gamma-band response and its modulation by attention in first-episode psychosis.","authors":"Alfredo L Sklar, Sayna Matinrazm, Annika Esseku, Fran López-Caballero, Mark Curtis, Dylan Seebold, Natasha Torrence, Vanessa Fishel, Brian A Coffman, Dean F Salisbury","doi":"10.1017/S0033291724003052","DOIUrl":"10.1017/S0033291724003052","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Executive control over low-level information processing is impaired proximal to psychosis onset with evidence of recovery over the first year of illness. However, previous studies demonstrating diminished perceptual modulation via attention are complicated by simultaneously impaired perceptual responses. The present study examined the early auditory gamma-band response (EAGBR), a marker of early cortical processing that appears preserved in first-episode psychosis (FEP), and its modulation by attention in a longitudinal FEP sample.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Magnetoencephalography was recorded from 25 FEP and 32 healthy controls (HC) during active and passive listening conditions in an auditory oddball task at baseline and follow-up (4-12 months) sessions. EAGBR inter-trial phase coherence (ITPC) and evoked power were measured from responses to standard tones. Symptoms were assessed using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no group difference in EAGBR power or ITPC. While EAGBR ITPC increased with attention in HC, this modulation was impaired among FEP. Diminished EAGBR modulation in FEP persisted at longitudinal follow-up. However, among FEP, recovery of EAGBR modulation was associated with reduced PANSS negative scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>FEP exhibit impaired executive control over the flow of information at the earliest stages of sensory processing within auditory cortex. In contrast to previous work, this deficit was observed despite an intact measure of sensory processing, mitigating potential confounds. Recovery of sensory gain modulation over time was associated with reductions in negative symptoms, highlighting a source of potential resiliency against some of the most debilitating and treatment refractory symptoms in early psychosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":20891,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11650157/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142771731","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-02DOI: 10.1017/S0033291724002587
Chloe Burke, Tom P Freeman, Hannah Sallis, Robyn E Wootton, Annabel Burnley, Jonas Lange, Rachel Lees, Katherine Sawyer, Gemma M J Taylor
Background: Observational studies consistently report associations between tobacco use, cannabis use and mental illness. However, the extent to which this association reflects an increased risk of new-onset mental illness is unclear and may be biased by unmeasured confounding.
Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis (CRD42021243903). Electronic databases were searched until November 2022. Longitudinal studies in general population samples assessing tobacco and/or cannabis use and reporting the association (e.g. risk ratio [RR]) with incident anxiety, mood, or psychotic disorders were included. Estimates were combined using random-effects meta-analyses. Bias was explored using a modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, confounder matrix, E-values, and Doi plots.
Results: Seventy-five studies were included. Tobacco use was associated with mood disorders (K = 43; RR: 1.39, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.30-1.47), but not anxiety disorders (K = 7; RR: 1.21, 95% CI 0.87-1.68) and evidence for psychotic disorders was influenced by treatment of outliers (K = 4, RR: 3.45, 95% CI 2.63-4.53; K = 5, RR: 2.06, 95% CI 0.98-4.29). Cannabis use was associated with psychotic disorders (K = 4; RR: 3.19, 95% CI 2.07-4.90), but not mood (K = 7; RR: 1.31, 95% CI 0.92-1.86) or anxiety disorders (K = 7; RR: 1.10, 95% CI 0.99-1.22). Confounder matrices and E-values suggested potential overestimation of effects. Only 27% of studies were rated as high quality.
Conclusions: Both substances were associated with psychotic disorders and tobacco use was associated with mood disorders. There was no clear evidence of an association between cannabis use and mood or anxiety disorders. Limited high-quality studies underscore the need for future research using robust causal inference approaches (e.g. evidence triangulation).
背景:观察性研究一致报告了烟草使用、大麻使用与精神疾病之间的关联。然而,这种关联在多大程度上反映了新发精神疾病风险的增加尚不清楚,并且可能受到未测量的混杂因素的影响。方法:系统评价和荟萃分析(CRD42021243903)。到2022年11月为止,一直在搜索电子数据库。纳入了对一般人群样本进行的纵向研究,评估烟草和/或大麻的使用情况,并报告其与突发焦虑、情绪或精神障碍的关联(如风险比[RR])。使用随机效应荟萃分析对估计值进行合并。使用改进的纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表、混杂矩阵、e值和Doi图探讨偏差。结果:纳入75项研究。吸烟与情绪障碍相关(K = 43;RR: 1.39, 95%可信区间[CI] 1.30-1.47),但没有焦虑障碍(K = 7;相对危险度:1.21,95% CI 0.87-1.68),精神障碍的证据受到异常值治疗的影响(K = 4, RR: 3.45, 95% CI 2.63-4.53;K = 5, rr: 2.06, 95% ci 0.98-4.29)。大麻使用与精神障碍相关(K = 4;RR: 3.19, 95% CI 2.07-4.90),但与情绪无关(K = 7;RR: 1.31, 95% CI 0.92-1.86)或焦虑症(K = 7;Rr: 1.10, 95% ci 0.99-1.22)。混杂矩阵和e值表明可能高估了效果。只有27%的研究被评为高质量。结论:这两种物质与精神障碍有关,吸烟与情绪障碍有关。没有明确的证据表明大麻使用与情绪或焦虑障碍之间存在关联。有限的高质量研究强调了使用可靠的因果推理方法(例如证据三角测量)进行未来研究的必要性。
{"title":"Associations of cannabis use, tobacco use, and incident anxiety, mood, and psychotic disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Chloe Burke, Tom P Freeman, Hannah Sallis, Robyn E Wootton, Annabel Burnley, Jonas Lange, Rachel Lees, Katherine Sawyer, Gemma M J Taylor","doi":"10.1017/S0033291724002587","DOIUrl":"10.1017/S0033291724002587","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Observational studies consistently report associations between tobacco use, cannabis use and mental illness. However, the extent to which this association reflects an increased risk of new-onset mental illness is unclear and may be biased by unmeasured confounding.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review and meta-analysis (CRD42021243903). Electronic databases were searched until November 2022. Longitudinal studies in general population samples assessing tobacco and/or cannabis use and reporting the association (e.g. risk ratio [RR]) with incident anxiety, mood, or psychotic disorders were included. Estimates were combined using random-effects meta-analyses. Bias was explored using a modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, confounder matrix, <i>E</i>-values, and Doi plots.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-five studies were included. Tobacco use was associated with mood disorders (<i>K</i> = 43; RR: 1.39, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.30-1.47), but not anxiety disorders (<i>K</i> = 7; RR: 1.21, 95% CI 0.87-1.68) and evidence for psychotic disorders was influenced by treatment of outliers (<i>K</i> = 4, RR: 3.45, 95% CI 2.63-4.53; <i>K</i> = 5, RR: 2.06, 95% CI 0.98-4.29). Cannabis use was associated with psychotic disorders (<i>K</i> = 4; RR: 3.19, 95% CI 2.07-4.90), but not mood (<i>K</i> = 7; RR: 1.31, 95% CI 0.92-1.86) or anxiety disorders (<i>K</i> = 7; RR: 1.10, 95% CI 0.99-1.22). Confounder matrices and <i>E</i>-values suggested potential overestimation of effects. Only 27% of studies were rated as high quality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both substances were associated with psychotic disorders and tobacco use was associated with mood disorders. There was no clear evidence of an association between cannabis use and mood or anxiety disorders. Limited high-quality studies underscore the need for future research using robust causal inference approaches (e.g. evidence triangulation).</p>","PeriodicalId":20891,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11650197/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142771821","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}