首页 > 最新文献

Psychological Medicine最新文献

英文 中文
Latent class analysis of depressive symptoms and associations with suicidal thoughts, plans, and attempts among a large national sample. 对全国大样本中的抑郁症状及其与自杀念头、计划和企图的关联进行潜类分析。
IF 5.9 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2024-09-25 DOI: 10.1017/S0033291724002009
Annabelle M Mournet, Evan M Kleiman

Background: Depression is strongly associated with risk for suicidal behaviors. However, depression is a highly heterogeneous condition (i.e. there are more than 200 combinations of DSM-5-TR depressive symptoms to correspond to a depression diagnosis). Limited research to date has taken an empirical approach to see how people cluster together based on their classification of depressive symptoms and whether people in certain classes are more likely to report suicide outcomes than other classes. This analysis leverages the National Survey on Drug Use and Health and examines classes of depressive symptoms to explore differences in suicide-related outcomes by class among adults endorsing depressive symptoms (n = 41 969).

Methods: We used latent class analysis (LCA) to identify classes of individuals' DSM-5 depressive symptoms presentation and then explored differences in suicide-related outcomes (i.e. suicide plans, suicide attempts) by the resulting classes.

Results: A four-class model was determined to optimize the fit criteria. Class 3 (high depressive symptoms) had significantly greater rates of suicide-related outcomes, followed by class 1 (high depressed mood and moderate worthlessness), with classes 4 and 2 having significantly lower rates of suicide-related outcomes.

Conclusions: The use of LCA provided valuable findings on the importance of leveraging both a multi-faceted assessment of depressive symptoms to identify cases where a high number of depressive symptoms are endorsed, and review of the specific symptoms endorsed. Worthlessness, in particular, may be of particular value to focus on within the context of suicide prevention.

背景:抑郁症与自杀行为的风险密切相关:抑郁症与自杀行为的风险密切相关。然而,抑郁症是一种高度异质性的疾病(即有 200 多种 DSM-5-TR 抑郁症状组合与抑郁症诊断相对应)。迄今为止,只有有限的研究采用实证方法来了解人们如何根据抑郁症状的分类进行聚类,以及某些类别的人是否比其他类别的人更有可能报告自杀结果。本分析利用全国药物使用和健康调查(National Survey on Drug Use and Health),研究抑郁症状的类别,以探讨在认可抑郁症状的成年人(n = 41 969)中,不同类别的自杀相关结果的差异:我们使用潜类分析(LCA)确定了个人的DSM-5抑郁症状表现类别,然后探讨了不同类别的自杀相关结果(即自杀计划、自杀未遂)的差异:结果:确定了一个四级模型来优化拟合标准。第 3 类(高抑郁症状)的自杀相关结果发生率明显更高,其次是第 1 类(高抑郁情绪和中度无价值感),第 4 类和第 2 类的自杀相关结果发生率明显更低:LCA 的使用提供了有价值的发现,即利用抑郁症状的多方面评估来识别抑郁症状较多的病例,以及审查所认可的具体症状的重要性。尤其是 "无价值感",在预防自杀方面可能具有特别重要的价值。
{"title":"Latent class analysis of depressive symptoms and associations with suicidal thoughts, plans, and attempts among a large national sample.","authors":"Annabelle M Mournet, Evan M Kleiman","doi":"10.1017/S0033291724002009","DOIUrl":"10.1017/S0033291724002009","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Depression is strongly associated with risk for suicidal behaviors. However, depression is a highly heterogeneous condition (i.e. there are more than 200 combinations of DSM-5-TR depressive symptoms to correspond to a depression diagnosis). Limited research to date has taken an empirical approach to see how people cluster together based on their classification of depressive symptoms and whether people in certain classes are more likely to report suicide outcomes than other classes. This analysis leverages the National Survey on Drug Use and Health and examines classes of depressive symptoms to explore differences in suicide-related outcomes by class among adults endorsing depressive symptoms (<i>n</i> = 41 969).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used latent class analysis (LCA) to identify classes of individuals' DSM-5 depressive symptoms presentation and then explored differences in suicide-related outcomes (i.e. suicide plans, suicide attempts) by the resulting classes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A four-class model was determined to optimize the fit criteria. Class 3 (high depressive symptoms) had significantly greater rates of suicide-related outcomes, followed by class 1 (high depressed mood and moderate worthlessness), with classes 4 and 2 having significantly lower rates of suicide-related outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of LCA provided valuable findings on the importance of leveraging both a multi-faceted assessment of depressive symptoms to identify cases where a high number of depressive symptoms are endorsed, and review of the specific symptoms endorsed. Worthlessness, in particular, may be of particular value to focus on within the context of suicide prevention.</p>","PeriodicalId":20891,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11496219/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142352759","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Psychosis risk for lesbian, gay, and bisexual individuals: systematic review and meta-analysis. 女同性恋者、男同性恋者和双性恋者的精神病风险:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
IF 5.9 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2024-09-25 DOI: 10.1017/S0033291724002253
Jean-Paul Selten, Hussam Alrashed, Hans Oh, Gabriëlla A M Blokland

The social defeat hypothesis posits that low status and repeated humiliation increase the risk for psychotic disorders (PDs) and psychotic experiences (PEs). The purpose of this paper was to provide a systematic review of studies on risk of PDs and PEs among lesbian, gay, or bisexual (LGB) people and a quantitative synthesis of any difference in risk. PubMed, PsycINFO, Embase, and Web of Science were searched from database inception until January 30, 2024. Two independent reviewers assessed the eligibility and quality of studies, extracted effect sizes, and noted the results of mediation analyses. Using a random effects model we computed pooled odds ratios (ORs). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed. The search identified seven studies of PDs and six of PEs. As for PDs, the unadjusted (2.13; 95% confidence interval 0.72-6.34) and covariate-adjusted pooled OR (2.24; 1.72-3.53) were not significantly increased for LGB individuals. After exclusion of a study of limited quality, both the unadjusted pooled OR (2.77; 1.21-6.32) and the covariate-adjusted pooled OR (2.67; 1.53-4.66) were significantly increased. The pooled ORs were increased for PEs: unadjusted, pooled OR = 1.97 (1.47-2.63), covariate-adjusted, pooled OR = 1.85 (1.50-2.28). Studies of PE that examined the mediating role of several variables reported that the contribution of drug abuse was small compared to that of psychosocial stressors. The results of a study in adolescents suggested a protective effect of parental support. These findings suggest an increased psychosis risk for LGB people and support the social defeat hypothesis.

社会挫败假说认为,地位低下和反复受辱会增加患精神病性障碍(PDs)和精神病性经历(PEs)的风险。本文旨在对有关女同性恋者、男同性恋者或双性恋者(LGB)罹患精神病性障碍和精神病性经历风险的研究进行系统综述,并对风险差异进行定量分析。我们检索了从数据库建立之初到 2024 年 1 月 30 日的 PubMed、PsycINFO、Embase 和 Web of Science。两位独立审稿人对研究的资格和质量进行了评估,提取了效应大小,并记录了中介分析的结果。我们使用随机效应模型计算了汇总的几率比(ORs)。我们遵循了《系统综述和元分析首选报告项目》指南。通过检索,我们发现了 7 项 PD 研究和 6 项 PE 研究。在PDs方面,LGB人群的未调整OR值(2.13;95%置信区间为0.72-6.34)和经协变量调整的汇总OR值(2.24;1.72-3.53)均无明显增加。在排除了一项质量有限的研究后,未经调整的汇总 OR(2.77;1.21-6.32)和经协变量调整的汇总 OR(2.67;1.53-4.66)均显著增加。PE的汇总OR值也有所增加:未经调整的汇总OR值=1.97(1.47-2.63),经协变因素调整的汇总OR值=1.85(1.50-2.28)。对几个变量的中介作用进行研究后发现,与社会心理压力因素相比,药物滥用的作用很小。一项针对青少年的研究结果表明,父母的支持具有保护作用。这些研究结果表明,女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋和变性者患精神病的风险增加,并支持社会失败假说。
{"title":"Psychosis risk for lesbian, gay, and bisexual individuals: systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Jean-Paul Selten, Hussam Alrashed, Hans Oh, Gabriëlla A M Blokland","doi":"10.1017/S0033291724002253","DOIUrl":"10.1017/S0033291724002253","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The social defeat hypothesis posits that low status and repeated humiliation increase the risk for psychotic disorders (PDs) and psychotic experiences (PEs). The purpose of this paper was to provide a systematic review of studies on risk of PDs and PEs among lesbian, gay, or bisexual (LGB) people and a quantitative synthesis of any difference in risk. PubMed, PsycINFO, Embase, and Web of Science were searched from database inception until January 30, 2024. Two independent reviewers assessed the eligibility and quality of studies, extracted effect sizes, and noted the results of mediation analyses. Using a random effects model we computed pooled odds ratios (ORs). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed. The search identified seven studies of PDs and six of PEs. As for PDs, the unadjusted (2.13; 95% confidence interval 0.72-6.34) and covariate-adjusted pooled OR (2.24; 1.72-3.53) were not significantly increased for LGB individuals. After exclusion of a study of limited quality, both the unadjusted pooled OR (2.77; 1.21-6.32) and the covariate-adjusted pooled OR (2.67; 1.53-4.66) were significantly increased. The pooled ORs were increased for PEs: unadjusted, pooled OR = 1.97 (1.47-2.63), covariate-adjusted, pooled OR = 1.85 (1.50-2.28). Studies of PE that examined the mediating role of several variables reported that the contribution of drug abuse was small compared to that of psychosocial stressors. The results of a study in adolescents suggested a protective effect of parental support. These findings suggest an increased psychosis risk for LGB people and support the social defeat hypothesis.</p>","PeriodicalId":20891,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11536103/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142352764","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Letter to the editor regarding 'Is combined antidepressant medication (ADM) and psychotherapy better than either monotherapy at preventing suicide attempts and other psychiatric serious adverse events for depressed patients? A rare events meta-analysis'. 致编辑的信,内容涉及 "在预防抑郁症患者自杀企图和其他精神科严重不良事件方面,联合使用抗抑郁药物(ADM)和心理疗法是否优于单一疗法?罕见事件荟萃分析"。
IF 5.9 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2024-09-25 DOI: 10.1017/S0033291724002071
Alexander Lisinski, Fredrik Hieronymus
{"title":"Letter to the editor regarding 'Is combined antidepressant medication (ADM) and psychotherapy better than either monotherapy at preventing suicide attempts and other psychiatric serious adverse events for depressed patients? A rare events meta-analysis'.","authors":"Alexander Lisinski, Fredrik Hieronymus","doi":"10.1017/S0033291724002071","DOIUrl":"10.1017/S0033291724002071","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":20891,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-2"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11496211/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142352760","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Cognitive behavioral interventions for depression and anxiety in adults with neurological disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. 针对患有神经系统疾病的成年人的抑郁和焦虑的认知行为干预:系统综述和荟萃分析。
IF 5.9 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2024-09-25 DOI: 10.1017/S0033291724001995
Milena Gandy, Thomas Woldhuis, Wendy Wu, Marette Youssef, Madelyne A Bisby, Blake F Dear, Andreea I Heriseanu, Amelia J Scott

We examined the efficacy of cognitive and behavioral interventions for improving symptoms of depression and anxiety in adults with neurological disorders. A pre-registered systematic search of Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Embase, and Neurobite was performed from inception to May 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) which examined the efficacy of cognitive and behavioral interventions in treating depression and/or anxiety among adults with neurological disorders were included. Estimates were pooled using a random-effects meta-analysis. Subgroup analyses and meta-regression were performed on categorical and continuous moderators, respectively. Main outcomes were pre- and post-intervention depression and anxiety symptom scores, as reported using standardized measures. Fifty-four RCTs involving 5372 participants with 11 neurological disorders (including multiple sclerosis, epilepsy, stroke) were included. The overall effect of interventions yielded significant improvements in both depression (57 arms, Hedges' g = 0.45, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.35-0.54) and anxiety symptoms (29 arms, g = 0.38, 95% CI 0.29-0.48), compared to controls. Efficacy was greater in studies which employed a minimum baseline symptom severity inclusion criterion for both outcomes, and greater in trials using inactive controls for depression only. There was also evidence of differential efficacy of interventions across the neurological disorder types and the outcome measure used. Risk of bias, intervention delivery mode, intervention tailoring for neurological disorders, sample size, and study year did not moderate effects. Cognitive and behavioral interventions yield small-to-moderate improvements in symptoms of both depression and anxiety in adults with a range of neurological disorders.

我们研究了认知和行为干预对改善神经系统疾病成人患者抑郁和焦虑症状的疗效。从开始到 2024 年 5 月,我们对 Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials、MEDLINE、PsycINFO、Embase 和 Neurobite 进行了预先登记的系统性检索。纳入的随机对照试验(RCT)研究了认知和行为干预对治疗患有神经系统疾病的成人抑郁症和/或焦虑症的疗效。采用随机效应荟萃分析法对估计值进行汇总。分别对分类调节因子和连续调节因子进行了分组分析和元回归分析。主要结果为干预前后的抑郁和焦虑症状评分,采用标准化测量方法进行报告。共纳入了 54 项 RCT,涉及 5372 名患有 11 种神经系统疾病(包括多发性硬化、癫痫和中风)的参与者。与对照组相比,干预措施的总体效果显著改善了抑郁症状(57 项干预措施,赫奇斯 g = 0.45,95% 置信区间 [CI] 0.35-0.54)和焦虑症状(29 项干预措施,g = 0.38,95% 置信区间 0.29-0.48)。对这两项结果均采用最低基线症状严重程度纳入标准的研究疗效更高,仅对抑郁症采用非活动对照的试验疗效更高。还有证据表明,不同的神经系统疾病类型和所采用的结果测量方法的干预效果也不同。偏倚风险、干预实施模式、针对神经系统疾病的干预调整、样本大小和研究年份并不影响效果。认知和行为干预对患有各种神经系统疾病的成年人的抑郁和焦虑症状都有小到中等程度的改善。
{"title":"Cognitive behavioral interventions for depression and anxiety in adults with neurological disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Milena Gandy, Thomas Woldhuis, Wendy Wu, Marette Youssef, Madelyne A Bisby, Blake F Dear, Andreea I Heriseanu, Amelia J Scott","doi":"10.1017/S0033291724001995","DOIUrl":"10.1017/S0033291724001995","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We examined the efficacy of cognitive and behavioral interventions for improving symptoms of depression and anxiety in adults with neurological disorders. A pre-registered systematic search of Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Embase, and Neurobite was performed from inception to May 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) which examined the efficacy of cognitive and behavioral interventions in treating depression and/or anxiety among adults with neurological disorders were included. Estimates were pooled using a random-effects meta-analysis. Subgroup analyses and meta-regression were performed on categorical and continuous moderators, respectively. Main outcomes were pre- and post-intervention depression and anxiety symptom scores, as reported using standardized measures. Fifty-four RCTs involving 5372 participants with 11 neurological disorders (including multiple sclerosis, epilepsy, stroke) were included. The overall effect of interventions yielded significant improvements in both depression (57 arms, Hedges' <i>g</i> = 0.45, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.35-0.54) and anxiety symptoms (29 arms, <i>g</i> = 0.38, 95% CI 0.29-0.48), compared to controls. Efficacy was greater in studies which employed a minimum baseline symptom severity inclusion criterion for both outcomes, and greater in trials using inactive controls for depression only. There was also evidence of differential efficacy of interventions across the neurological disorder types and the outcome measure used. Risk of bias, intervention delivery mode, intervention tailoring for neurological disorders, sample size, and study year did not moderate effects. Cognitive and behavioral interventions yield small-to-moderate improvements in symptoms of both depression and anxiety in adults with a range of neurological disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":20891,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11496241/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142352755","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Genetic architecture and socio-environmental risk factors for major depressive disorder in Nepal 尼泊尔重度抑郁障碍的遗传结构和社会环境风险因素
IF 6.9 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2024-09-16 DOI: 10.1017/s0033291724001284
Karmel W. Choi, Justin D. Tubbs, Younga H. Lee, Yixuan He, Kristin Tsuo, Mary T. Yohannes, Lethukuthula L. Nkambule, Emily Madsen, Dirgha J. Ghimire, Sabrina Hermosilla, Tian Ge, Alicia R. Martin, William G. Axinn, Jordan W. Smoller
Background

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is the leading cause of disability globally, with moderate heritability and well-established socio-environmental risk factors. Genetic studies have been mostly restricted to European settings, with polygenic scores (PGS) demonstrating low portability across diverse global populations.

Methods

This study examines genetic architecture, polygenic prediction, and socio-environmental correlates of MDD in a family-based sample of 10 032 individuals from Nepal with array genotyping data. We used genome-based restricted maximum likelihood to estimate heritability, applied S-LDXR to estimate the cross-ancestry genetic correlation between Nepalese and European samples, and modeled PGS trained on a GWAS meta-analysis of European and East Asian ancestry samples.

Results

We estimated the narrow-sense heritability of lifetime MDD in Nepal to be 0.26 (95% CI 0.18–0.34, p = 8.5 × 10−6). Our analysis was underpowered to estimate the cross-ancestry genetic correlation (rg = 0.26, 95% CI −0.29 to 0.81). MDD risk was associated with higher age (beta = 0.071, 95% CI 0.06–0.08), female sex (beta = 0.160, 95% CI 0.15–0.17), and childhood exposure to potentially traumatic events (beta = 0.050, 95% CI 0.03–0.07), while neither the depression PGS (beta = 0.004, 95% CI −0.004 to 0.01) or its interaction with childhood trauma (beta = 0.007, 95% CI −0.01 to 0.03) were strongly associated with MDD.

Conclusions

Estimates of lifetime MDD heritability in this Nepalese sample were similar to previous European ancestry samples, but PGS trained on European data did not predict MDD in this sample. This may be due to differences in ancestry-linked causal variants, differences in depression phenotyping between the training and target data, or setting-specific environmental factors that modulate genetic effects. Additional research among under-represented global populations will ensure equitable translation of genomic findings.

背景重度抑郁障碍(MDD)是导致全球残疾的主要原因,具有中度遗传性和公认的社会环境风险因素。遗传研究大多局限于欧洲环境,而多基因评分(PGS)在全球不同人群中的可移植性较低。本研究利用阵列基因分型数据,在尼泊尔的 10 032 个家庭样本中研究了 MDD 的遗传结构、多基因预测和社会环境相关因素。我们使用基于基因组的限制性最大似然法估计遗传率,应用 S-LDXR 估计尼泊尔样本与欧洲样本之间的跨祖先遗传相关性,并根据欧洲和东亚祖先样本的 GWAS meta 分析建立 PGS 模型。我们的分析不足以估计跨宗族遗传相关性(rg = 0.26,95% CI -0.29-0.81)。MDD 风险与较高的年龄(beta = 0.071,95% CI 0.06-0.08)、女性性别(beta = 0.160,95% CI 0.15-0.17)和童年遭受潜在创伤事件(beta = 0.050,95% CI 0.03-0.07)相关,而抑郁 PGS(beta = 0.004,95% CI -0.004 to 0.结论该尼泊尔样本中终生 MDD 遗传性的估计值与之前的欧洲血统样本相似,但根据欧洲数据训练的 PGS 无法预测该样本中的 MDD。这可能是由于与祖先相关的因果变异的差异、训练数据和目标数据之间抑郁表型的差异或调节遗传效应的特定环境因素造成的。在全球代表性不足的人群中开展更多研究将确保基因组研究结果的公平转化。
{"title":"Genetic architecture and socio-environmental risk factors for major depressive disorder in Nepal","authors":"Karmel W. Choi, Justin D. Tubbs, Younga H. Lee, Yixuan He, Kristin Tsuo, Mary T. Yohannes, Lethukuthula L. Nkambule, Emily Madsen, Dirgha J. Ghimire, Sabrina Hermosilla, Tian Ge, Alicia R. Martin, William G. Axinn, Jordan W. Smoller","doi":"10.1017/s0033291724001284","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033291724001284","url":null,"abstract":"<span>Background</span><p>Major depressive disorder (MDD) is the leading cause of disability globally, with moderate heritability and well-established socio-environmental risk factors. Genetic studies have been mostly restricted to European settings, with polygenic scores (PGS) demonstrating low portability across diverse global populations.</p><span>Methods</span><p>This study examines genetic architecture, polygenic prediction, and socio-environmental correlates of MDD in a family-based sample of 10 032 individuals from Nepal with array genotyping data. We used genome-based restricted maximum likelihood to estimate heritability, applied S-LDXR to estimate the cross-ancestry genetic correlation between Nepalese and European samples, and modeled PGS trained on a GWAS meta-analysis of European and East Asian ancestry samples.</p><span>Results</span><p>We estimated the narrow-sense heritability of lifetime MDD in Nepal to be 0.26 (95% CI 0.18–0.34, <span>p</span> = 8.5 × 10<span>−6</span>). Our analysis was underpowered to estimate the cross-ancestry genetic correlation (rg = 0.26, 95% CI −0.29 to 0.81). MDD risk was associated with higher age (beta = 0.071, 95% CI 0.06–0.08), female sex (beta = 0.160, 95% CI 0.15–0.17), and childhood exposure to potentially traumatic events (beta = 0.050, 95% CI 0.03–0.07), while neither the depression PGS (beta = 0.004, 95% CI −0.004 to 0.01) or its interaction with childhood trauma (beta = 0.007, 95% CI −0.01 to 0.03) were strongly associated with MDD.</p><span>Conclusions</span><p>Estimates of lifetime MDD heritability in this Nepalese sample were similar to previous European ancestry samples, but PGS trained on European data did not predict MDD in this sample. This may be due to differences in ancestry-linked causal variants, differences in depression phenotyping between the training and target data, or setting-specific environmental factors that modulate genetic effects. Additional research among under-represented global populations will ensure equitable translation of genomic findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":20891,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Medicine","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.9,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142263663","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Characterizing Veteran suicide decedents that were not classified as high-suicide-risk 未被列为高自杀风险的退伍军人自杀死者的特征
IF 6.9 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2024-09-16 DOI: 10.1017/s0033291724001296
Maxwell Levis, Monica Dimambro, Joshua Levy, Vincent Dufort, Abby Fraade, Max Winer, Brian Shiner
Background

Although the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has made important suicide prevention advances, efforts primarily target high-risk patients with documented suicide risk, such as suicidal ideation, prior suicide attempts, and recent psychiatric hospitalization. Approximately 90% of VA patients that go on to die by suicide do not meet these high-risk criteria and therefore do not receive targeted suicide prevention services. In this study, we used national VA data to focus on patients that were not classified as high-risk, but died by suicide.

Methods

Our sample included all VA patients who died by suicide in 2017 or 2018. We determined whether patients were classified as high-risk using the VA's machine learning risk prediction algorithm. After excluding these patients, we used principal component analysis to identify moderate-risk and low-risk patients and investigated demographics, service-usage, diagnoses, and social determinants of health differences across high-, moderate-, and low-risk subgroups.

Results

High-risk (n = 452) patients tended to be younger, White, unmarried, homeless, and have more mental health diagnoses compared to moderate- (n = 2149) and low-risk (n = 2209) patients. Moderate- and low-risk patients tended to be older, married, Black, and Native American or Pacific Islander, and have more physical health diagnoses compared to high-risk patients. Low-risk patients had more missing data than higher-risk patients.

Conclusions

Study expands epidemiological understanding about non-high-risk suicide decedents, historically understudied and underserved populations. Findings raise concerns about reliance on machine learning risk prediction models that may be biased by relative underrepresentation of racial/ethnic minorities within health system.

背景虽然退伍军人事务部(VA)在预防自杀方面取得了重要进展,但其工作主要针对的是有自杀风险记录的高危患者,例如有自杀意念、曾有自杀企图以及最近曾住过精神病院。大约 90% 的退伍军人自杀死亡患者不符合这些高风险标准,因此没有得到有针对性的自杀预防服务。在本研究中,我们使用退伍军人事务部的全国数据,重点关注未被归类为高风险但死于自杀的患者。方法我们的样本包括所有在 2017 年或 2018 年死于自杀的退伍军人事务部患者。我们使用退伍军人事务部的机器学习风险预测算法确定患者是否被归类为高风险。排除这些患者后,我们使用主成分分析来确定中度风险和低风险患者,并调查了高、中、低风险亚组的人口统计学、服务使用、诊断和健康的社会决定因素差异。结果与中度风险(n = 2149)和低风险(n = 2209)患者相比,高风险(n = 452)患者倾向于年轻、白人、未婚、无家可归,并有更多的心理健康诊断。与高风险患者相比,中度和低风险患者往往年龄较大、已婚、黑人、美国原住民或太平洋岛民,并有更多的身体健康诊断。与高危患者相比,低危患者有更多的数据缺失。结论这项研究拓展了流行病学对非高危自杀死者的了解,这些死者是历来研究不足和服务欠缺的人群。研究结果引起了人们对依赖机器学习风险预测模型的担忧,因为这种模型可能会因医疗系统中少数种族/族裔的代表性相对不足而产生偏差。
{"title":"Characterizing Veteran suicide decedents that were not classified as high-suicide-risk","authors":"Maxwell Levis, Monica Dimambro, Joshua Levy, Vincent Dufort, Abby Fraade, Max Winer, Brian Shiner","doi":"10.1017/s0033291724001296","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033291724001296","url":null,"abstract":"<span>Background</span><p>Although the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has made important suicide prevention advances, efforts primarily target high-risk patients with documented suicide risk, such as suicidal ideation, prior suicide attempts, and recent psychiatric hospitalization. Approximately 90% of VA patients that go on to die by suicide do not meet these high-risk criteria and therefore do not receive targeted suicide prevention services. In this study, we used national VA data to focus on patients that were not classified as high-risk, but died by suicide.</p><span>Methods</span><p>Our sample included all VA patients who died by suicide in 2017 or 2018. We determined whether patients were classified as high-risk using the VA's machine learning risk prediction algorithm. After excluding these patients, we used principal component analysis to identify moderate-risk and low-risk patients and investigated demographics, service-usage, diagnoses, and social determinants of health differences across high-, moderate-, and low-risk subgroups.</p><span>Results</span><p>High-risk (<span>n</span> = 452) patients tended to be younger, White, unmarried, homeless, and have more mental health diagnoses compared to moderate- (<span>n</span> = 2149) and low-risk (<span>n</span> = 2209) patients. Moderate- and low-risk patients tended to be older, married, Black, and Native American or Pacific Islander, and have more physical health diagnoses compared to high-risk patients. Low-risk patients had more missing data than higher-risk patients.</p><span>Conclusions</span><p>Study expands epidemiological understanding about non-high-risk suicide decedents, historically understudied and underserved populations. Findings raise concerns about reliance on machine learning risk prediction models that may be biased by relative underrepresentation of racial/ethnic minorities within health system.</p>","PeriodicalId":20891,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Medicine","volume":"93 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.9,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142263662","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Do people recover from the impact of COVID-19 social isolation? Social connectivity and negative affective bias. 人们会从COVID-19社会隔离的影响中恢复过来吗?社会连通性与负面情绪偏差。
IF 6.9 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2024-09-12 DOI: 10.1017/s0033291724001351
A R Bland,J P Roiser,M A Mehta,T W Robbins,R Elliott,B J Sahakian
{"title":"Do people recover from the impact of COVID-19 social isolation? Social connectivity and negative affective bias.","authors":"A R Bland,J P Roiser,M A Mehta,T W Robbins,R Elliott,B J Sahakian","doi":"10.1017/s0033291724001351","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033291724001351","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":20891,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Medicine","volume":"10 1","pages":"1-3"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142195072","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Lisdexamfetamine maintenance treatment for binge-eating disorder following successful treatments: randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial 暴食症成功治疗后的利舍胺维持治疗:随机双盲安慰剂对照试验
IF 6.9 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2024-09-11 DOI: 10.1017/s003329172400148x
Carlos M. Grilo, Valentina Ivezaj, Sydney Yurkow, Cenk Tek, Ashley A. Wiedemann, Ralitza Gueorguieva
Background Controlled research examining maintenance treatments for responders to acute interventions for binge-eating disorder (BED) is limited. This study tested efficacy of lisdexamfetamine (LDX) maintenance treatment amongst acute responders. Methods This prospective randomized double-blind placebo-controlled single-site trial, conducted March 2019 to September 2023, tested LDX as maintenance treatment for responders to acute treatments with LDX-alone or with cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT + LDX) for BED with obesity. Sixty-one (83.6% women, mean age 44.3, mean BMI 36.1 kg/m2) acute responders were randomized to LDX (N = 32) or placebo (N = 29) for 12 weeks; 95.1% completed posttreatment assessments. Mixed-models and generalized-estimating equations comparing maintenance LDX v. placebo included main/interactive effects of acute (LDX or CBT + LDX) treatments to examine their predictive/moderating effects. Results Relapse rates (to diagnosis-level binge-eating frequency) following maintenance treatments were 10.0% (N = 3/30) for LDX and 17.9% (N = 5/28) for placebo; intention-to-treat binge-eating remission rates were 59.4% (N = 19/32) and 65.5% (N = 19/29), respectively. Maintenance LDX and placebo did not differ significantly in binge-eating but differed in weight-loss and eating-disorder psychopathology. Maintenance LDX was associated with significant weight-loss (−2.3%) whereas placebo had significant weight-gain (+2.2%); LDX and placebo differed significantly in weight-change throughout treatment and at posttreatment. Eating-disorder psychopathology remained unchanged with LDX but increased significantly with placebo. Acute treatments did not significantly predict/moderate maintenance-treatment outcomes. Conclusions Adults with BED/obesity who respond to acute lisdexamfetamine treatment (regardless of additionally receiving CBT) had good maintenance during subsequent 12-weeks. Maintenance lisdexamfetamine, relative to placebo, did not provide further benefit for binge-eating but was associated with significantly better eating-disorder psychopathology outcomes and greater weight-loss.
背景 对暴饮暴食症(BED)急性期干预措施应答者进行维持治疗的对照研究十分有限。本研究测试了利血平(LDX)对急性期应答者进行维持治疗的疗效。方法 这项前瞻性随机双盲安慰剂对照单点试验于2019年3月至2023年9月进行,测试了LDX作为单独使用LDX或认知行为疗法(CBT + LDX)治疗暴食症合并肥胖症的急性期应答者的维持治疗。61名(83.6%为女性,平均年龄44.3岁,平均体重指数36.1 kg/m2)急性期应答者被随机分配到LDX(32人)或安慰剂(29人)治疗12周;95.1%完成了治疗后评估。混合模型和广义估计方程比较了LDX与安慰剂的维持治疗效果,包括急性期(LDX或CBT + LDX)治疗的主要/交互效应,以检查其预测/调节作用。结果 LDX维持治疗后的复发率(达到诊断水平的暴食频率)为10.0%(3/30),安慰剂为17.9%(5/28);意向治疗暴食缓解率分别为59.4%(19/32)和65.5%(19/29)。维持性 LDX 和安慰剂在暴食方面没有显著差异,但在体重减轻和进食障碍心理病理学方面存在差异。维持性 LDX 可显著降低体重(-2.3%),而安慰剂可显著增加体重(+2.2%);在整个治疗过程中和治疗后,LDX 和安慰剂在体重变化方面存在显著差异。进食障碍心理病理学在使用 LDX 后保持不变,但在使用安慰剂后则明显增加。急性治疗对维持治疗结果的预测/调节作用不明显。结论 对利血平急性治疗(无论是否同时接受了CBT治疗)有反应的成人暴食症/肥胖症患者在随后的12周内保持良好的治疗效果。相对于安慰剂,利司他敏的维持治疗对暴饮暴食没有进一步的益处,但对进食障碍的精神病理学结果和体重减轻有显著改善。
{"title":"Lisdexamfetamine maintenance treatment for binge-eating disorder following successful treatments: randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial","authors":"Carlos M. Grilo, Valentina Ivezaj, Sydney Yurkow, Cenk Tek, Ashley A. Wiedemann, Ralitza Gueorguieva","doi":"10.1017/s003329172400148x","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s003329172400148x","url":null,"abstract":"Background Controlled research examining maintenance treatments for responders to acute interventions for binge-eating disorder (BED) is limited. This study tested efficacy of lisdexamfetamine (LDX) maintenance treatment amongst acute responders. Methods This prospective randomized double-blind placebo-controlled single-site trial, conducted March 2019 to September 2023, tested LDX as maintenance treatment for responders to acute treatments with LDX-alone or with cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT + LDX) for BED with obesity. Sixty-one (83.6% women, mean age 44.3, mean BMI 36.1 kg/m<jats:sup>2</jats:sup>) acute responders were randomized to LDX (<jats:italic>N</jats:italic> = 32) or placebo (<jats:italic>N</jats:italic> = 29) for 12 weeks; 95.1% completed posttreatment assessments. Mixed-models and generalized-estimating equations comparing maintenance LDX <jats:italic>v.</jats:italic> placebo included main/interactive effects of acute (LDX or CBT + LDX) treatments to examine their predictive/moderating effects. Results Relapse rates (to diagnosis-level binge-eating frequency) following maintenance treatments were 10.0% (<jats:italic>N</jats:italic> = 3/30) for LDX and 17.9% (<jats:italic>N</jats:italic> = 5/28) for placebo; intention-to-treat binge-eating remission rates were 59.4% (<jats:italic>N</jats:italic> = 19/32) and 65.5% (<jats:italic>N</jats:italic> = 19/29), respectively. Maintenance LDX and placebo did not differ significantly in binge-eating but differed in weight-loss and eating-disorder psychopathology. Maintenance LDX was associated with significant weight-loss (−2.3%) whereas placebo had significant weight-gain (+2.2%); LDX and placebo differed significantly in weight-change throughout treatment and at posttreatment. Eating-disorder psychopathology remained unchanged with LDX but increased significantly with placebo. Acute treatments did not significantly predict/moderate maintenance-treatment outcomes. Conclusions Adults with BED/obesity who respond to acute lisdexamfetamine treatment (regardless of additionally receiving CBT) had good maintenance during subsequent 12-weeks. Maintenance lisdexamfetamine, relative to placebo, did not provide further benefit for binge-eating but was associated with significantly better eating-disorder psychopathology outcomes and greater weight-loss.","PeriodicalId":20891,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Medicine","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.9,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142195073","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Public mental health – a challenge for local communities and research 公共心理健康--地方社区和研究面临的挑战
IF 6.9 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2024-09-10 DOI: 10.1017/s0033291724001478
Stefan Priebe, Ulrich Reininghaus
Common approaches for improving the mental health of the population in general and of vulnerable groups in particular include policies to address social determinants and the expansion of professional health services. Both approaches have substantial limitations in practice. A more promising option is actions that utilize resources that either already exist or can easily be generated in local communities. Examples are provided for various local initiatives with the potential to facilitate helpful interactions and relationships that are likely to benefit the mental health of significant parts of the population. Developing and implementing such initiatives is a challenge to communities, while their evaluation may require innovative methods in research.
改善普通民众,特别是弱势群体心理健康的常见方法包括制定政策,解决社会决定 因素和扩大专业保健服务。这两种方法在实践中都有很大的局限性。一个更有前途的选择是利用当地社区已经存在或很容易产生的资源采取行动。本文举例说明了各种有可能促进有益的互动和关系的地方举措,这些举措很可能会使 相当一部分人的心理健康受益。制定和实施这些倡议对社区来说是一项挑战,而对这些倡议的评估可能需要创新的研究方法。
{"title":"Public mental health – a challenge for local communities and research","authors":"Stefan Priebe, Ulrich Reininghaus","doi":"10.1017/s0033291724001478","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033291724001478","url":null,"abstract":"Common approaches for improving the mental health of the population in general and of vulnerable groups in particular include policies to address social determinants and the expansion of professional health services. Both approaches have substantial limitations in practice. A more promising option is actions that utilize resources that either already exist or can easily be generated in local communities. Examples are provided for various local initiatives with the potential to facilitate helpful interactions and relationships that are likely to benefit the mental health of significant parts of the population. Developing and implementing such initiatives is a challenge to communities, while their evaluation may require innovative methods in research.","PeriodicalId":20891,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Medicine","volume":"108 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.9,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142195077","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Discussing the concept of substance-induced psychosis (SIP) 讨论药物诱发精神病(SIP)的概念
IF 6.9 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2024-09-10 DOI: 10.1017/s0033291724001442
Jørgen G. Bramness, Carsten Hjorthøj, Solja Niemelä, Heidi Taipale, Eline Borger Rognli
Substance-induced psychosis (SIP) is characterized by both substance use and a psychotic state, and it is assumed that the first causes the latter. In ICD-10 the diagnosis is categorized as and grouped together with substance use disorders, and to a large extent also treated as such in the health care system. Though criticism of the diagnostic construct of SIP dates back several decades, numerous large and high-quality studies have been published during the past 5–10 years that substantiate and amplify this critique. The way we understand SIP and even how we name it is of major importance for treatment and it has judicial consequences. It has been demonstrated that substance use alone is not sufficient to cause psychosis, and that other risk factors besides substance use are at play. These are risk factors that are also known to be associated with schizophrenia spectrum disorders. Furthermore, register-based studies from several different countries find that a large proportion, around one in four, of those who are initially diagnosed with an SIP over time are subsequently diagnosed with a schizophrenia spectrum disorder. This scoping review discusses the construct validity of SIP considering recent evidence. We challenge the immanent causal assumption in SIP, and advocate that the condition shares many features with the schizophrenia spectrum disorders. In conclusion, we argue that SIP just as well could be considered a first-episode psychotic disorder in patients with substance use.
药物诱发精神病(SIP)的特点是同时存在药物使用和精神病状态,并假定前者导致后者。在《国际疾病分类标准》(ICD-10)中,该诊断被归类为药物使用障碍,并与药物使用障碍放在一起,在很大程度上,医疗保健系统也将其作为药物使用障碍来处理。尽管对 SIP 诊断结构的批评可以追溯到几十年前,但过去 5-10 年间发表的大量高质量研究证实并扩大了这一批评。我们如何理解 SIP,甚至如何命名 SIP,对治疗具有重要意义,而且会产生司法后果。事实证明,仅仅使用药物不足以导致精神病,除了使用药物之外,还有其他风险因素在起作用。众所周知,这些风险因素也与精神分裂症谱系障碍有关。此外,来自多个不同国家的登记研究发现,在最初被诊断为精神分裂症谱系障碍的患者中,随着时间的推移,有很大一部分(约四分之一)随后被诊断为精神分裂症谱系障碍。本范围界定综述结合最近的证据讨论了精神分裂症谱系障碍的构建有效性。我们对 SIP 的内在因果关系假设提出质疑,并主张该病症与精神分裂症谱系障碍有许多共同之处。总之,我们认为 SIP 也可以被视为药物滥用患者的首发精神病性障碍。
{"title":"Discussing the concept of substance-induced psychosis (SIP)","authors":"Jørgen G. Bramness, Carsten Hjorthøj, Solja Niemelä, Heidi Taipale, Eline Borger Rognli","doi":"10.1017/s0033291724001442","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033291724001442","url":null,"abstract":"Substance-induced psychosis (SIP) is characterized by both substance use and a psychotic state, and it is assumed that the first causes the latter. In ICD-10 the diagnosis is categorized as and grouped together with substance use disorders, and to a large extent also treated as such in the health care system. Though criticism of the diagnostic construct of SIP dates back several decades, numerous large and high-quality studies have been published during the past 5–10 years that substantiate and amplify this critique. The way we understand SIP and even how we name it is of major importance for treatment and it has judicial consequences. It has been demonstrated that substance use alone is not sufficient to cause psychosis, and that other risk factors besides substance use are at play. These are risk factors that are also known to be associated with schizophrenia spectrum disorders. Furthermore, register-based studies from several different countries find that a large proportion, around one in four, of those who are initially diagnosed with an SIP over time are subsequently diagnosed with a schizophrenia spectrum disorder. This scoping review discusses the construct validity of SIP considering recent evidence. We challenge the immanent causal assumption in SIP, and advocate that the condition shares many features with the schizophrenia spectrum disorders. In conclusion, we argue that SIP just as well could be considered a first-episode psychotic disorder in patients with substance use.","PeriodicalId":20891,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Medicine","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.9,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142195074","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Psychological Medicine
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1