Michael J Constantino, Alice E Coyne, James F Boswell
The field of psychotherapy research has come a long way since its inception. In addition to foundational data on psychotherapy's general efficacy and effectiveness, there has been steadily mounting evidence to answer questions, such as how, for which patients, when delivered by which therapists, and under what conditions does psychosocial treatment work? Moreover, there have been key methodological and data analytic developments over time, which have supported or catalyzed, respectively, more nuanced or new psychotherapy knowledge. Nonetheless, given the field's relatively young age, as well as the need for greater replication of results, better science-practice integration, and higher consensus on psychotherapy's core and consensual scientific principles, the field arguably remains somewhat immature and in need of more empirical advancements to meet the ever-rising need for effective mental health care. Such progressions will often come in incremental steps; however, "big needle movements" are also needed to embody or set the stage for more revolutionary changes in how we study, understand, and practice psychotherapy. To this end, the articles in the present special section exemplify such innovations through their big-impact results and/or promising proof-of-concept methods. In this introduction to the section, we summarize the sizeable potential of the nine included articles to influence and inspire the field of psychotherapy. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
心理治疗研究领域自成立以来已经走过了漫长的道路。除了关于心理治疗总体功效和效果的基础数据之外,还有越来越多的证据可以回答一些问题,比如心理治疗是如何起作用的,针对哪些患者,何时由哪位治疗师提供治疗,以及在什么条件下起作用?此外,随着时间的推移,关键的方法和数据分析的发展,分别支持或催化了更细致入微或新的心理治疗知识。尽管如此,考虑到该领域相对年轻,以及需要更多的结果复制,更好的科学实践整合,以及对心理治疗核心和共识科学原则的更高共识,该领域可以说仍然有些不成熟,需要更多的经验进步来满足不断增长的对有效心理健康护理的需求。这种进展通常是循序渐进的;然而,在我们如何研究、理解和实践心理治疗方面,也需要“大针头运动”来体现或为更革命性的变化奠定基础。为此,本专题部分中的文章通过其具有重大影响的结果和/或有希望的概念验证方法来举例说明此类创新。在本部分的介绍中,我们总结了这九篇文章在影响和启发心理治疗领域方面的巨大潜力。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Big needle jumps in psychotherapy research.","authors":"Michael J Constantino, Alice E Coyne, James F Boswell","doi":"10.1037/pst0000582","DOIUrl":"10.1037/pst0000582","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The field of psychotherapy research has come a long way since its inception. In addition to foundational data on psychotherapy's general efficacy and effectiveness, there has been steadily mounting evidence to answer questions, such as how, for which patients, when delivered by which therapists, and under what conditions does psychosocial treatment work? Moreover, there have been key methodological and data analytic developments over time, which have supported or catalyzed, respectively, more nuanced or new psychotherapy knowledge. Nonetheless, given the field's relatively young age, as well as the need for greater replication of results, better science-practice integration, and higher consensus on psychotherapy's core and consensual scientific principles, the field arguably remains somewhat immature and in need of more empirical advancements to meet the ever-rising need for effective mental health care. Such progressions will often come in incremental steps; however, \"big needle movements\" are also needed to embody or set the stage for more revolutionary changes in how we study, understand, and practice psychotherapy. To this end, the articles in the present special section exemplify such innovations through their big-impact results and/or promising proof-of-concept methods. In this introduction to the section, we summarize the sizeable potential of the nine included articles to influence and inspire the field of psychotherapy. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20910,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy","volume":"62 3","pages":"263-266"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144966503","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-01Epub Date: 2025-07-21DOI: 10.1037/pst0000588
Gianina Frediani, Mart De Henau, Isabelle De Pooter, Peter Rober, Siebrecht Vanhooren
Research shows how therapists struggle to stay present with their clients' existential concerns. Our goal was to explore what hinders and enables therapists to stay present and engaged when existential concerns surface in the session. We invited 22 therapists (12 novice and 10 experienced) to engage in a role-play with a client expressing her existential concerns using a standardized script. Subsequently, the therapists were interviewed using a videotape-assisted recall procedure. Data were analyzed according to the descriptive-interpretive qualitative research approach. When confronted with existential themes in the session, novice therapists experienced overwhelming feelings of powerlessness and uncertainty, blocking their ability to remain open to the client's existential experiences. Lack of knowledge and encountering their own existential vulnerability were mentioned as triggers. For experienced therapists, the main challenge was to stay present while feeling impacted by the existential topic, which they managed by grounding and reanchoring themselves. Our findings support the idea that embracing one's own existential issues and being at ease with existential themes may be essential conditions for staying present and fostering an authentic therapeutic encounter. Furthermore, our findings suggest that gaining knowledge about the existential process and learning to ground and reanchor oneself are essential for therapists. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
研究表明,治疗师如何努力与客户的存在性担忧保持一致。我们的目标是探索当存在主义问题出现时,是什么阻碍和使治疗师保持在场和参与。我们邀请了22名治疗师(12名新手和10名有经验的治疗师)与一位客户进行角色扮演,用标准化的剧本表达她的存在主义担忧。随后,使用录像带辅助回忆程序对治疗师进行访谈。采用描述性-解释性质的研究方法对数据进行分析。在治疗过程中,当面对存在主义主题时,新手治疗师会感受到压倒性的无力感和不确定性,这阻碍了他们对来访者的存在主义经历保持开放的能力。缺乏知识和遇到自身存在的脆弱性被认为是触发因素。对于经验丰富的治疗师来说,主要的挑战是在被存在主义话题影响时保持存在,他们通过接地和重新锚定自己来应对。我们的研究结果支持这样一种观点,即接受自己的存在主义问题,对存在主义主题感到自在,可能是保持当下和培养真实治疗遭遇的必要条件。此外,我们的研究结果表明,对治疗师来说,获得关于存在过程的知识和学习扎根和重新定位自己是必不可少的。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Maintaining therapeutic presence and empathy when engaging with a client's existential concerns.","authors":"Gianina Frediani, Mart De Henau, Isabelle De Pooter, Peter Rober, Siebrecht Vanhooren","doi":"10.1037/pst0000588","DOIUrl":"10.1037/pst0000588","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Research shows how therapists struggle to stay present with their clients' existential concerns. Our goal was to explore what hinders and enables therapists to stay present and engaged when existential concerns surface in the session. We invited 22 therapists (12 novice and 10 experienced) to engage in a role-play with a client expressing her existential concerns using a standardized script. Subsequently, the therapists were interviewed using a videotape-assisted recall procedure. Data were analyzed according to the descriptive-interpretive qualitative research approach. When confronted with existential themes in the session, novice therapists experienced overwhelming feelings of powerlessness and uncertainty, blocking their ability to remain open to the client's existential experiences. Lack of knowledge and encountering their own existential vulnerability were mentioned as triggers. For experienced therapists, the main challenge was to stay present while feeling impacted by the existential topic, which they managed by grounding and reanchoring themselves. Our findings support the idea that embracing one's own existential issues and being at ease with existential themes may be essential conditions for staying present and fostering an authentic therapeutic encounter. Furthermore, our findings suggest that gaining knowledge about the existential process and learning to ground and reanchor oneself are essential for therapists. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20910,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"376-386"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144675537","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Yejin Lee, Evelyn Hunter, Aaron T McLaughlin, Jamian Coleman, Cirleen DeBlaere, Jesse Owen, Kyndel Tarziers, Don E Davis
This article applies the multicultural orientation framework (D. E. Davis et al., 2018) to enhance religious/spiritual competencies. The skills gap in multicultural training is especially pronounced in the area of spiritual, existential, religious, and theological competencies; many clinicians report minimal and insufficient training (Vieten & Lukoff, 2022). We frame orienting to clients' values and visions as a cultural opportunity. To integrate multicultural orientation skills into routine clinical training throughout the career, we propose three approaches: (a) course curriculum, (b) peer consultation, and (c) continuing education. First, we provide instruction on incorporating video case studies into any course to engage students in discussions that promote perspective-taking, dialectical thinking, and wisdom. Second, we outline an eight-step model of peer consultation that focuses on cultural humility to promote trust and cultural comfort and increase sensitivity in clinical judgment. Third, given the American Psychological Association's forthcoming revisions to their ethics code emphasizing social justice (Campbell et al., 2024), we propose integrating the previous two approaches with routine ethics training for continuing education. With an eye toward future innovations in training, we also discuss how these structures align with projects that employ artificial intelligence to identify markers in therapy. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
本文应用多元文化取向框架(D. E. Davis et al., 2018)来增强宗教/精神能力。多元文化培训中的技能差距在精神、存在主义、宗教和神学能力领域尤为明显;许多临床医生报告培训很少且不足(Vieten & Lukoff, 2022)。我们将客户的价值观和愿景定位为一种文化机遇。为了将多元文化导向技能整合到整个职业生涯的常规临床培训中,我们提出了三种方法:(a)课程设置,(b)同伴咨询,和(c)继续教育。首先,我们提供将视频案例研究纳入任何课程的指导,以吸引学生参与讨论,促进换位思考,辩证思维和智慧。其次,我们概述了一个八步同伴咨询模型,该模型侧重于文化谦逊,以促进信任和文化舒适,并提高临床判断的敏感性。第三,鉴于美国心理协会即将修订其强调社会正义的道德准则(Campbell et al., 2024),我们建议将前两种方法与继续教育的常规道德培训相结合。着眼于未来的培训创新,我们还讨论了这些结构如何与使用人工智能识别治疗标记的项目相结合。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Cultural opportunities involving spiritual, existential, religious, or theological (SERT) themes: Three practical approaches.","authors":"Yejin Lee, Evelyn Hunter, Aaron T McLaughlin, Jamian Coleman, Cirleen DeBlaere, Jesse Owen, Kyndel Tarziers, Don E Davis","doi":"10.1037/pst0000599","DOIUrl":"10.1037/pst0000599","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article applies the multicultural orientation framework (D. E. Davis et al., 2018) to enhance religious/spiritual competencies. The skills gap in multicultural training is especially pronounced in the area of spiritual, existential, religious, and theological competencies; many clinicians report minimal and insufficient training (Vieten & Lukoff, 2022). We frame orienting to clients' values and visions as a cultural opportunity. To integrate multicultural orientation skills into routine clinical training throughout the career, we propose three approaches: (a) course curriculum, (b) peer consultation, and (c) continuing education. First, we provide instruction on incorporating video case studies into any course to engage students in discussions that promote perspective-taking, dialectical thinking, and wisdom. Second, we outline an eight-step model of peer consultation that focuses on cultural humility to promote trust and cultural comfort and increase sensitivity in clinical judgment. Third, given the American Psychological Association's forthcoming revisions to their ethics code emphasizing social justice (Campbell et al., 2024), we propose integrating the previous two approaches with routine ethics training for continuing education. With an eye toward future innovations in training, we also discuss how these structures align with projects that employ artificial intelligence to identify markers in therapy. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20910,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144966480","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Christiana Lall-Alvarez, Nathaniel G Wade, Joshua N Hook, Don E Davis
In this study, we sought to develop and test a trainee-driven educational intervention to increase competency in working with religion and spirituality (R/S) in psychotherapy. Trainees currently in mental health graduate training programs (N = 363) were randomly assigned to one of three conditions: (a) peer group plus self-study (PG), (b) immediate self-study (ISS), and (c) delayed self-study (DSS). All participants completed six weekly online training modules that included both didactic materials and deliberate practice. Using complete case analysis, we determined that compared to those in DSS, participants in PG reported a significantly greater increase from pre- to postintervention in religious/spiritual (R/S) cultural humility, R/S skills, comfort with R/S, positive R/S attitudes, and R/S self-efficacy. Compared to those in ISS, participants in PG reported significantly greater change in R/S self-efficacy in psychotherapy. We also compared these results with results using imputed data and only the comparison between DSS and PG remained significant for R/S skills and R/S self-efficacy. In addition, although participants in the peer-group plus self-study condition were less likely to complete both pre- and postintervention questionnaires, they completed almost twice as many training modules. The findings of this study support the possible benefit of trainee-driven educational interventions to help mental health graduate students increase their cultural humility, skills, comfort, positive attitudes, and self-efficacy for working with R/S in psychotherapy. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
在这项研究中,我们试图开发和测试一种受培训者驱动的教育干预,以提高在心理治疗中与宗教和灵性(R/S)合作的能力。目前正在参加心理健康研究生培训项目的学员(N = 363)被随机分配到三种情况中的一种:(a)同伴组加自学(PG), (b)即时自学(ISS)和(c)延迟自学(DSS)。所有参与者都完成了六个每周在线培训模块,包括教学材料和刻意练习。通过完整的案例分析,我们确定与DSS相比,PG参与者在宗教/精神(R/S)文化谦逊、R/S技能、R/S舒适、积极的R/S态度和R/S自我效能方面的干预前和干预后显著增加。与ISS组相比,PG组的参与者在心理治疗中R/S自我效能的变化显著更大。我们还将这些结果与使用输入数据的结果进行了比较,只有DSS和PG在R/S技能和R/S自我效能感方面的比较仍然显著。此外,虽然同伴组加自学组的参与者完成干预前和干预后问卷的可能性较低,但他们完成的培训模块几乎是干预前和干预后问卷的两倍。本研究的结果支持了以学员为导向的教育干预可能带来的好处,以帮助心理健康研究生提高他们在心理治疗中与R/S合作的文化谦逊、技能、舒适度、积极态度和自我效能感。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Efficacy of a trainee-driven approach to achieving religious and spiritual competencies in psychotherapy.","authors":"Christiana Lall-Alvarez, Nathaniel G Wade, Joshua N Hook, Don E Davis","doi":"10.1037/pst0000596","DOIUrl":"10.1037/pst0000596","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this study, we sought to develop and test a trainee-driven educational intervention to increase competency in working with religion and spirituality (R/S) in psychotherapy. Trainees currently in mental health graduate training programs (<i>N</i> = 363) were randomly assigned to one of three conditions: (a) peer group plus self-study (PG), (b) immediate self-study (ISS), and (c) delayed self-study (DSS). All participants completed six weekly online training modules that included both didactic materials and deliberate practice. Using complete case analysis, we determined that compared to those in DSS, participants in PG reported a significantly greater increase from pre- to postintervention in religious/spiritual (R/S) cultural humility, R/S skills, comfort with R/S, positive R/S attitudes, and R/S self-efficacy. Compared to those in ISS, participants in PG reported significantly greater change in R/S self-efficacy in psychotherapy. We also compared these results with results using imputed data and only the comparison between DSS and PG remained significant for R/S skills and R/S self-efficacy. In addition, although participants in the peer-group plus self-study condition were less likely to complete both pre- and postintervention questionnaires, they completed almost twice as many training modules. The findings of this study support the possible benefit of trainee-driven educational interventions to help mental health graduate students increase their cultural humility, skills, comfort, positive attitudes, and self-efficacy for working with R/S in psychotherapy. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20910,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144856140","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
One of the critical gaps in promoting religious and spiritual (R/S) competencies among clinicians in training revolves around student clinician hesitancy to engage in R/S conversations in session. This reluctance, in part, may be due to attitudinal biases based on one's own R/S experiences, which do not readily improve with knowledge and skills training. There is a need to understand how clinicians in training experience the actual process of addressing R/S content in clinical practice and academic training environments. This study describes findings based on the administration of a training tool-the Religious, Spiritual, and Secular Life Story Interview (adapted version of the Life Story Interview; McAdams, 2007)-designed to help trainees explore the nature and dynamics of clinician resistance to engage with R/S in psychotherapy. Participants included a religiously and spiritually diverse sample of 23 student clinicians from master's and doctoral-level programs across counseling, psychology, and social work disciplines, all of whom reported moderate to high levels of hesitancy about broaching R/S in the training process (i.e., in the classroom and/or psychotherapy sessions). Three themes emerged from the evaluative findings-person-centered skills, contextual factors, and growth through reflective storytelling-that offer clues about factors supporting the process of opening and engaging with religiousness, spirituality, and secularity. The discussion will address the potential of the Religious, Spiritual, and Secular Life Story Interview as a training tool to facilitate the acquisition of attitude-based R/S competencies that may lay the foundation for cultivating skills-based competencies. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
在培训中促进临床医生的宗教和精神(R/S)能力的关键差距之一是,学生临床医生在会话中参与R/S对话时犹豫不决。在某种程度上,这种不情愿可能是由于基于个人R/S经验的态度偏见,这种偏见不容易通过知识和技能培训得到改善。有必要了解培训中的临床医生如何在临床实践和学术培训环境中体验解决R/S内容的实际过程。本研究描述了基于一种培训工具——宗教、精神和世俗生活故事访谈(改编自生活故事访谈;McAdams, 2007)-旨在帮助学员探索临床医生在心理治疗中参与R/S的本质和动态。参与者包括来自咨询、心理学和社会工作学科的硕士和博士学位课程的23名临床医生学生,他们都报告在培训过程中(即在课堂和/或心理治疗课程中)对提出R/S有中度到高度的犹豫。评估结果中出现了三个主题——以人为本的技能、背景因素和通过反思性讲故事的成长——这些主题为支持开放和参与宗教、灵性和世俗过程的因素提供了线索。讨论将讨论宗教、精神和世俗生活故事访谈作为一种培训工具的潜力,以促进获得基于态度的R/S能力,这可能为培养基于技能的能力奠定基础。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"The Religious, Spiritual, and Secular Life Story Interview: Promoting attitude-based religious and spiritual competence in clinicians in training.","authors":"Gina M Magyar-Russell, Paul J Deal","doi":"10.1037/pst0000593","DOIUrl":"10.1037/pst0000593","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>One of the critical gaps in promoting religious and spiritual (R/S) competencies among clinicians in training revolves around student clinician hesitancy to engage in R/S conversations in session. This reluctance, in part, may be due to attitudinal biases based on one's own R/S experiences, which do not readily improve with knowledge and skills training. There is a need to understand how clinicians in training experience the actual process of addressing R/S content in clinical practice and academic training environments. This study describes findings based on the administration of a training tool-the Religious, Spiritual, and Secular Life Story Interview (adapted version of the Life Story Interview; McAdams, 2007)-designed to help trainees explore the nature and dynamics of clinician resistance to engage with R/S in psychotherapy. Participants included a religiously and spiritually diverse sample of 23 student clinicians from master's and doctoral-level programs across counseling, psychology, and social work disciplines, all of whom reported moderate to high levels of hesitancy about broaching R/S in the training process (i.e., in the classroom and/or psychotherapy sessions). Three themes emerged from the evaluative findings-<i>person-centered skills, contextual factors,</i> and <i>growth through reflective storytelling</i>-that offer clues about factors supporting the process of opening and engaging with religiousness, spirituality, and secularity. The discussion will address the potential of the <i>Religious, Spiritual, and Secular Life Story Interview</i> as a training tool to facilitate the acquisition of attitude-based R/S competencies that may lay the foundation for cultivating skills-based competencies. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20910,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2025-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144799992","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Roman Palitsky, Laura E Captari, Jessica L Maples-Keller, Caroline Peacock, David Rupert, Deanna M Kaplan, George Stavros, George H Grant, Steven J Sandage
Psychedelic-assisted therapies (PAT) can provoke personally meaningful spiritual or existential experiences in patients; these experiences have been associated with improved outcomes across several treatment targets and populations. The need for spiritual and religious competence, though present across the spectrum of psychotherapeutic practice, is especially strong in psychedelic-assisted psychotherapies. The relational spirituality model (RSM), a systematically developed and empirically tested framework for spiritual and religious competency in psychotherapy, offers a theoretical and practical framework for spiritual competency training in psychedelic therapies (Sandage et al., 2020). The model's inclusive spiritual, existential, religious, and theological (SERT) framework provides a broad and pluralistic approach that can meaningfully engage a wide range of SERT experiences and traditions in psychedelic-assisted psychotherapy. Further, the RSM can readily be integrated with other models of clinical care (e.g., palliative care), with a range of psychotherapeutic modalities, and within existing psychedelic training frameworks. To illustrate the application of the RSM to the development of religious and spiritual competence in PAT training, this article first describes the RSM. It then introduces methods for pragmatic training based on the RSM, which can be integrated with standard licensure-focused mental health training programs that might someday include applications for psychedelics or with specialized psychedelic-assisted therapy facilitation training programs. These include deliberate practice and experiential training components, "SERT groups," content and clinical theory, and training in assessment and case conceptualization. Finally, we discuss how the RSM can inform future directions in PAT training and support interdisciplinary approaches to PAT including collaborations across disciplines and healing communities. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
迷幻辅助疗法(PAT)可以激发患者个人有意义的精神或存在体验;这些经验与多个治疗目标和人群的预后改善有关。对精神和宗教能力的需求,虽然存在于心理治疗实践的各个领域,但在迷幻辅助心理治疗中尤为强烈。关系灵性模型(RSM)是一个系统开发和经验验证的心理治疗中精神和宗教能力框架,为迷幻治疗中的精神能力训练提供了理论和实践框架(Sandage等人,2020)。该模型的包容性精神、存在、宗教和神学(SERT)框架提供了一个广泛和多元化的方法,可以有意义地在迷幻辅助心理治疗中广泛参与SERT经验和传统。此外,RSM可以很容易地与其他临床护理模式(例如,姑息治疗)、一系列心理治疗模式和现有的迷幻培训框架相结合。为了说明在PAT训练中RSM在宗教和精神能力发展中的应用,本文首先描述了RSM。然后介绍了基于RSM的实用培训方法,这些方法可以与标准的以执照为中心的心理健康培训计划相结合,这些计划可能在某一天包括致幻剂的应用,或者与专门的致幻剂辅助治疗促进培训计划相结合。这些包括刻意练习和经验训练组成部分,“SERT小组”,内容和临床理论,以及评估和案例概念化培训。最后,我们讨论了RSM如何为PAT培训的未来方向提供信息,并支持跨学科的PAT方法,包括跨学科合作和治疗社区。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Applying relational spirituality to develop spiritual and religious competencies in psychedelic-assisted psychotherapy training.","authors":"Roman Palitsky, Laura E Captari, Jessica L Maples-Keller, Caroline Peacock, David Rupert, Deanna M Kaplan, George Stavros, George H Grant, Steven J Sandage","doi":"10.1037/pst0000594","DOIUrl":"10.1037/pst0000594","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Psychedelic-assisted therapies (PAT) can provoke personally meaningful spiritual or existential experiences in patients; these experiences have been associated with improved outcomes across several treatment targets and populations. The need for spiritual and religious competence, though present across the spectrum of psychotherapeutic practice, is especially strong in psychedelic-assisted psychotherapies. The relational spirituality model (RSM), a systematically developed and empirically tested framework for spiritual and religious competency in psychotherapy, offers a theoretical and practical framework for spiritual competency training in psychedelic therapies (Sandage et al., 2020). The model's inclusive spiritual, existential, religious, and theological (SERT) framework provides a broad and pluralistic approach that can meaningfully engage a wide range of SERT experiences and traditions in psychedelic-assisted psychotherapy. Further, the RSM can readily be integrated with other models of clinical care (e.g., palliative care), with a range of psychotherapeutic modalities, and within existing psychedelic training frameworks. To illustrate the application of the RSM to the development of religious and spiritual competence in PAT training, this article first describes the RSM. It then introduces methods for pragmatic training based on the RSM, which can be integrated with standard licensure-focused mental health training programs that might someday include applications for psychedelics or with specialized psychedelic-assisted therapy facilitation training programs. These include deliberate practice and experiential training components, \"SERT groups,\" content and clinical theory, and training in assessment and case conceptualization. Finally, we discuss how the RSM can inform future directions in PAT training and support interdisciplinary approaches to PAT including collaborations across disciplines and healing communities. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20910,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2025-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144776058","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This article is a practical contribution to the literature focused on developing competencies in addressing religion and spirituality in clinical practice, particularly with students in education and training programs. Details of a course in an American Psychological Association accredited doctoral program in clinical psychology are provided, illustrating the ways and means through which students are engaged in exploring, identifying, and articulating a conceptual and theoretical framework as well as developing methods and competencies that will be ethical and efficacious in the conduct of their clinical work. The course described is the third in a four-course required sequence that is focused on acquiring knowledge, skills, and attitudes that are consistent with competencies identified in the American Psychological Association Accreditation Standards as well as in the program's defined areas of special emphasis, one of which is addressing religion and spirituality in clinical practice. Key aspects of pedagogy related to readings, assignments, and classroom engagement are presented. Methods used to assess competencies are included as well as quantitative and qualitative data from student ratings of course effectiveness. Suggestions for future teaching, training, and research are offered. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
这篇文章是对文献的实际贡献,重点是在临床实践中发展处理宗教和灵性的能力,特别是在教育和培训项目中的学生。提供了美国心理协会认可的临床心理学博士课程的课程细节,说明了学生参与探索,识别和阐明概念和理论框架以及开发方法和能力的方法和手段,这些方法和手段将在他们的临床工作中合乎道德和有效。本课程是四门必修课程中的第三门课程,重点是获取与美国心理协会认证标准以及该课程定义的特别重点领域一致的知识、技能和态度,其中之一是解决临床实践中的宗教和灵性问题。介绍了与阅读、作业和课堂参与相关的教学法的关键方面。用于评估能力的方法,以及来自学生对课程有效性评分的定量和定性数据。对今后的教学、培训和研究提出了建议。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Cultivating religious and spiritual competencies in students of every faith and no faith in a university doctoral psychology program.","authors":"Theresa Clement Tisdale","doi":"10.1037/pst0000590","DOIUrl":"10.1037/pst0000590","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article is a practical contribution to the literature focused on developing competencies in addressing religion and spirituality in clinical practice, particularly with students in education and training programs. Details of a course in an American Psychological Association accredited doctoral program in clinical psychology are provided, illustrating the ways and means through which students are engaged in exploring, identifying, and articulating a conceptual and theoretical framework as well as developing methods and competencies that will be ethical and efficacious in the conduct of their clinical work. The course described is the third in a four-course required sequence that is focused on acquiring knowledge, skills, and attitudes that are consistent with competencies identified in the American Psychological Association Accreditation Standards as well as in the program's defined areas of special emphasis, one of which is addressing religion and spirituality in clinical practice. Key aspects of pedagogy related to readings, assignments, and classroom engagement are presented. Methods used to assess competencies are included as well as quantitative and qualitative data from student ratings of course effectiveness. Suggestions for future teaching, training, and research are offered. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20910,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144761146","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Stephanie Winkeljohn Black, Sanskriti Shrivastava, Dana Awlia, Marcus Crede
Given that spiritual and religious (S/R) topics can elicit discomfort and countertransference among psychotherapists, training frameworks that promote introspection and opportunities for repeated practice, or exposure, may be ideal starting points to develop S/R competencies. The current deliberate practice informed training program targeted cultural comfort and associated multicultural orientation constructs, aligning with prescribed attitude/awareness and broaching S/R competencies. This quasi-experimental, mixed method investigation analyzed whether a new S/R training program informed by deliberate practice principles was associated with changes in participants' (graduate students in graduate clinical/counseling psychology programs in the United States; N = 126) cultural comfort, self-perceived clinical performance, and self-perceived difficulty when engaging S/R video vignettes using specification curve analyses and a content analysis of follow-up interviews. Analyses indicated that all specifications had positive effects for the treatment (training condition, n = 65) for comfort (Bmedian = .46, range: .36-.58; 24 of 36 specifications were significant) and self-perceived performance (Bmedian = .48, range: .45-.55; all specifications significant). Analyses indicated that all specifications for treatment had an inverse association with self-rated difficulty, but all specifications were nonsignificant, suggesting no difference between training and control (n = 61) participants. Training condition participants indicated in a survey that the training was high quality, useful, and had no technology issues; the follow-up interviews with a smaller number of training condition participants provided insights into the training's strengths and weaknesses. The data in full create a roadmap for further study and training program modifications. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
{"title":"Psychotherapy trainees' perspectives on the impact, usability, and feasibility of an online program to increase multicultural orientation toward religious and spiritual clients.","authors":"Stephanie Winkeljohn Black, Sanskriti Shrivastava, Dana Awlia, Marcus Crede","doi":"10.1037/pst0000589","DOIUrl":"10.1037/pst0000589","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Given that spiritual and religious (S/R) topics can elicit discomfort and countertransference among psychotherapists, training frameworks that promote introspection and opportunities for repeated practice, or exposure, may be ideal starting points to develop S/R competencies. The current deliberate practice informed training program targeted cultural comfort and associated multicultural orientation constructs, aligning with prescribed attitude/awareness and broaching S/R competencies. This quasi-experimental, mixed method investigation analyzed whether a new S/R training program informed by deliberate practice principles was associated with changes in participants' (graduate students in graduate clinical/counseling psychology programs in the United States; <i>N</i> = 126) cultural comfort, self-perceived clinical performance, and self-perceived difficulty when engaging S/R video vignettes using specification curve analyses and a content analysis of follow-up interviews. Analyses indicated that all specifications had positive effects for the treatment (training condition, <i>n</i> = 65) for comfort (<i>B</i><sub>median</sub> = .46, range: .36-.58; 24 of 36 specifications were significant) and self-perceived performance (<i>B</i><sub>median</sub> = .48, range: .45-.55; all specifications significant). Analyses indicated that all specifications for treatment had an inverse association with self-rated difficulty, but all specifications were nonsignificant, suggesting no difference between training and control (<i>n</i> = 61) participants. Training condition participants indicated in a survey that the training was high quality, useful, and had no technology issues; the follow-up interviews with a smaller number of training condition participants provided insights into the training's strengths and weaknesses. The data in full create a roadmap for further study and training program modifications. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20910,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2025-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144732966","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Jennifer S Ripley, James N Sells, Logan Battaglini, Sarah Haught, Zhuo Job Chen, Vanessa Kent, Reema Smith, Caitlin Overfelt, Joyce Tan, Jared Tan, Francisco Villate, Joyelle Saunders, Daniel Waldheim, Rebekah Rose, Kaitlin Wray
Family Competency addressing religion and spirituality in relationships is based on principles of systems theory applied to diversity training in religion and spirituality. Relational spirituality and family systems theory are the theoretical bases for training clinicians to address religion and spirituality (R/S) competently. Relational issues of R/S include religious differences and conflicts in close relationships, spiritual impairment due to relationship distress, and the use of spiritual resources for coping in a family or community. Principles of cultural humility and comfort, clinical assessment of R/S, nonanxious presence, multidirected partiality, and differentiation were used to train clinicians. Participants (N = 174) were graduate students and professionals in mental health care who engaged in a 5-hr online training with switching replication measurement at three points before and after the training at 2-week intervals. Measurement included a newly validated six-item global measure of couple and family spiritual and religious competency (J. S. Ripley et al., 2024) and the Religious/Spiritually Integrated Practice Assessment Scale (Oxhandler, 2019). Mixed-effects models with two-way cross-level interactions of Treatment Condition (Immediate Treatment, Delayed Treatment) × Time (T1, T2, T3) supported change based on the intervention, especially for measures of self-efficacy, attitude, increased frequency of R/S integrated practice, and global relational R/S competency. Qualitative analysis of interviews with some participants (n = 10) identified several experiential themes. The models showed significant change after the training and maintenance of gains for the immediate treatment group. In conclusion, this demonstrated the efficacy of the relationally based training model in improving R/S competency in training graduate students and professionals. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
处理宗教和灵性关系中的家庭能力是基于应用于宗教和灵性多样性培训的系统理论原则。关系灵性和家庭系统理论是培训临床医生胜任宗教和灵性(R/S)的理论基础。R/S的关系问题包括亲密关系中的宗教差异和冲突,因关系窘迫而造成的精神损害,以及在家庭或社区中使用精神资源来应对。文化谦逊和舒适原则、R/S临床评估、无焦虑存在、多方向偏爱和区分用于培训临床医生。参与者(N = 174)为研究生和精神卫生保健专业人员,他们参加了5小时的在线培训,并在培训前后的三个点进行了转换复制测量,间隔2周。测量包括新验证的夫妻和家庭精神和宗教能力的六项全球测量(J. S. Ripley等人,2024)和宗教/精神综合实践评估量表(Oxhandler, 2019)。治疗条件(即时治疗、延迟治疗)×时间(T1、T2、T3)的双向交叉水平相互作用的混合效应模型支持基于干预的变化,特别是自我效能、态度、R/S综合实践频率增加和整体R/S关系能力的测量。对一些参与者(n = 10)的访谈进行定性分析,确定了几个体验主题。这些模型在训练后显示出显著的变化,并且立即治疗组的收益保持不变。综上所述,这证明了基于关系的培养模式在培养研究生和专业人员的R/S能力方面的有效性。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Obtaining religious and spiritual competencies for relationship therapy: Outcomes of Competency Addressing Religion and Spirituality (CARS) training.","authors":"Jennifer S Ripley, James N Sells, Logan Battaglini, Sarah Haught, Zhuo Job Chen, Vanessa Kent, Reema Smith, Caitlin Overfelt, Joyce Tan, Jared Tan, Francisco Villate, Joyelle Saunders, Daniel Waldheim, Rebekah Rose, Kaitlin Wray","doi":"10.1037/pst0000595","DOIUrl":"10.1037/pst0000595","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Family Competency addressing religion and spirituality in relationships is based on principles of systems theory applied to diversity training in religion and spirituality. Relational spirituality and family systems theory are the theoretical bases for training clinicians to address religion and spirituality (R/S) competently. Relational issues of R/S include religious differences and conflicts in close relationships, spiritual impairment due to relationship distress, and the use of spiritual resources for coping in a family or community. Principles of cultural humility and comfort, clinical assessment of R/S, nonanxious presence, multidirected partiality, and differentiation were used to train clinicians. Participants (<i>N</i> = 174) were graduate students and professionals in mental health care who engaged in a 5-hr online training with switching replication measurement at three points before and after the training at 2-week intervals. Measurement included a newly validated six-item global measure of couple and family spiritual and religious competency (J. S. Ripley et al., 2024) and the Religious/Spiritually Integrated Practice Assessment Scale (Oxhandler, 2019). Mixed-effects models with two-way cross-level interactions of Treatment Condition (Immediate Treatment, Delayed Treatment) × Time (T1, T2, T3) supported change based on the intervention, especially for measures of self-efficacy, attitude, increased frequency of R/S integrated practice, and global relational R/S competency. Qualitative analysis of interviews with some participants (<i>n</i> = 10) identified several experiential themes. The models showed significant change after the training and maintenance of gains for the immediate treatment group. In conclusion, this demonstrated the efficacy of the relationally based training model in improving R/S competency in training graduate students and professionals. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20910,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144708577","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
P Scott Richards, Russell S Jones, Peter W Sanders
This study evaluated the effectiveness of a live videoconferencing training program in spiritually integrated psychotherapy offered by ACPE: The Standard for Spiritual Care and Education (ACPE). We used a quasi-experimental one-group pretest-posttest group design to investigate whether participants' religious/spiritual competencies (self-efficacy, attitudes, and skills) improved and whether their use of spiritual interventions increased after completing the training program. We also assessed whether their perceptions of the barriers to practicing spiritually integrated treatment in their practice setting changed after training. The research participants were 84 adult men and women from diverse spiritual backgrounds, mental health specialties, and geographic locations who completed the measures before and after the training program. A repeated measures multivariate analysis of variance and follow-up t-tests revealed that the participants' spiritual competency and usage of spiritual interventions during treatment sessions significantly increased after the training program. Most Cohen's d effect sizes were large or moderately large, indicating that the improvements were educationally and clinically meaningful. The study provides preliminary evidence that ACPE's live, videoconferencing spiritually integrated psychotherapy training program enhanced the spiritual competencies of the participating mental health and pastoral professionals. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
本研究评估了由ACPE:精神关怀与教育标准(ACPE)提供的精神综合心理治疗现场视频会议培训项目的有效性。我们采用准实验的一组前测后测组设计来调查参与者的宗教/精神能力(自我效能感、态度和技能)是否得到改善,以及他们在完成培训计划后是否增加了对精神干预的使用。我们还评估了他们对在实践环境中进行精神综合治疗的障碍的看法在培训后是否发生了变化。研究参与者是84名成年男性和女性,他们来自不同的精神背景、心理健康专业和地理位置,他们在培训项目前后完成了测量。重复测量多变量方差分析和随访t检验显示,在培训计划后,参与者的精神能力和精神干预的使用在治疗期间显着增加。大多数的科恩效应量是大的或中等大的,这表明这些改善在教育和临床上都是有意义的。本研究提供了初步证据,证明ACPE的现场、视频会议精神整合心理治疗培训计划提高了参与的心理健康和牧师专业人员的精神能力。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Improving psychotherapists' spiritual and religious competencies: Evaluation of a live videoconferencing training program.","authors":"P Scott Richards, Russell S Jones, Peter W Sanders","doi":"10.1037/pst0000584","DOIUrl":"10.1037/pst0000584","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study evaluated the effectiveness of a live videoconferencing training program in spiritually integrated psychotherapy offered by ACPE: The Standard for Spiritual Care and Education (ACPE). We used a quasi-experimental one-group pretest-posttest group design to investigate whether participants' religious/spiritual competencies (self-efficacy, attitudes, and skills) improved and whether their use of spiritual interventions increased after completing the training program. We also assessed whether their perceptions of the barriers to practicing spiritually integrated treatment in their practice setting changed after training. The research participants were 84 adult men and women from diverse spiritual backgrounds, mental health specialties, and geographic locations who completed the measures before and after the training program. A repeated measures multivariate analysis of variance and follow-up t-tests revealed that the participants' spiritual competency and usage of spiritual interventions during treatment sessions significantly increased after the training program. Most Cohen's <i>d</i> effect sizes were large or moderately large, indicating that the improvements were educationally and clinically meaningful. The study provides preliminary evidence that ACPE's live, videoconferencing spiritually integrated psychotherapy training program enhanced the spiritual competencies of the participating mental health and pastoral professionals. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20910,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144199919","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}