首页 > 最新文献

Psychotherapy最新文献

英文 中文
Beyond the treatment manual: Examining factors influencing Black client engagement in psychotherapy. 超越治疗手册:检查影响黑人来访者参与心理治疗的因素。
IF 3.9 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2026-02-26 DOI: 10.1037/pst0000617
Miracle R Potter, Fatou Gaye, Tyler B Rice, Anika Sigel, Victoria K Swaine, Brandon King, Thomas E Joiner, Ericka M Lewis

Despite the benefits of psychotherapy to improve mental health outcomes, therapy remains significantly underutilized among Black Americans. Yet, once therapy is initiated, Black clients experience mental health outcomes comparable to those in the general population, underscoring potential barriers to engagement. To address this gap, our qualitative study explored factors that contribute to client engagement throughout the therapeutic process, including core therapeutic skills related to therapist qualities, provider-client alliances, and nontherapeutic factors that shape the client experience. Using a qualitative hermeneutic phenomenological approach, semistructured qualitative interviews were conducted with past and current Black clients at a university-based training clinic about their experiences engaging in therapy. Data were analyzed through thematic analysis, and a codebook was developed to adequately capture patterns in perspectives across the interviews. Major themes, including therapist acknowledgment of cultural identity and perceived therapeutic collaboration, were emphasized as being integral in promoting engagement. Additionally, participants discussed factors that contributed to positive treatment experiences, including flexible procedures and accommodating clinic staff. These findings suggest that cultural acknowledgment, therapeutic collaboration, and a supportive clinic environment are essential to increasing Black clients' utilization of therapeutic services. Understanding the factors that increase accessibility and engagement for Black clients can lead to improved treatment outcomes. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).

尽管心理治疗对改善心理健康结果有好处,但在美国黑人中,心理治疗仍未得到充分利用。然而,一旦开始治疗,黑人客户所经历的心理健康结果与普通人群相当,这突显了参与治疗的潜在障碍。为了解决这一差距,我们的定性研究探索了在整个治疗过程中有助于客户参与的因素,包括与治疗师素质相关的核心治疗技能,提供者-客户联盟,以及塑造客户体验的非治疗因素。采用定性解释学现象学方法,在大学培训诊所对过去和现在的黑人客户进行了半结构化定性访谈,了解他们参与治疗的经历。通过专题分析对数据进行了分析,并开发了一个代码本,以充分捕捉访谈中各个角度的模式。主要主题,包括治疗师对文化认同的承认和感知的治疗合作,被强调为促进参与的组成部分。此外,参与者还讨论了促成积极治疗体验的因素,包括灵活的程序和乐于助人的诊所工作人员。这些发现表明,文化认同、治疗合作和支持性的临床环境对提高黑人客户对治疗服务的利用至关重要。了解提高黑人客户可及性和参与度的因素可以改善治疗结果。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2026 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Beyond the treatment manual: Examining factors influencing Black client engagement in psychotherapy.","authors":"Miracle R Potter, Fatou Gaye, Tyler B Rice, Anika Sigel, Victoria K Swaine, Brandon King, Thomas E Joiner, Ericka M Lewis","doi":"10.1037/pst0000617","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pst0000617","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite the benefits of psychotherapy to improve mental health outcomes, therapy remains significantly underutilized among Black Americans. Yet, once therapy is initiated, Black clients experience mental health outcomes comparable to those in the general population, underscoring potential barriers to engagement. To address this gap, our qualitative study explored factors that contribute to client engagement throughout the therapeutic process, including core therapeutic skills related to therapist qualities, provider-client alliances, and nontherapeutic factors that shape the client experience. Using a qualitative hermeneutic phenomenological approach, semistructured qualitative interviews were conducted with past and current Black clients at a university-based training clinic about their experiences engaging in therapy. Data were analyzed through thematic analysis, and a codebook was developed to adequately capture patterns in perspectives across the interviews. Major themes, including therapist acknowledgment of cultural identity and perceived therapeutic collaboration, were emphasized as being integral in promoting engagement. Additionally, participants discussed factors that contributed to positive treatment experiences, including flexible procedures and accommodating clinic staff. These findings suggest that cultural acknowledgment, therapeutic collaboration, and a supportive clinic environment are essential to increasing Black clients' utilization of therapeutic services. Understanding the factors that increase accessibility and engagement for Black clients can lead to improved treatment outcomes. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20910,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147290791","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Examining two pedagogical methods on attitudes toward religiousness within mental health and social justice in an undergraduate course. 在本科课程中对宗教态度的两种教学方法的研究。
IF 3.9 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2026-01-19 DOI: 10.1037/pst0000613
Craig A Warlick, Calista A Spears

Integrating spirituality and religiousness (S/R) into mental health (MH) treatment aligns with our ethics codes and professional guidelines, and it can promote therapeutic outcomes. There is emerging evidence among samples of professional clinicians and graduate students that the Spirituality Competency Training in MH curriculum (SCT-MH; Pearce et al., 2019) may address the dearth of training in this intersection. However, SCT-MH needs to be assessed among undergraduates to support vocational development and those who pursue graduate school or bachelor-level mental health work. In this exploratory pedagogical study, we used a series of repeated measures analyses of variance to assess undergraduate students' (N = 39) attitudes toward a revised version of the Attitudes subscale of the S/R integration into MH Scale (Oxhandler & Parrish, 2016), the Social Justice Scale (SJS; Torres-Harding et al., 2012), and single-item scales focused on pursuing MH-focused work postdegree across teaching-as-usual and SCT-MH curricula. During teaching-as-usual, there were no significant increases in attitude scores regarding S/R integration (p = .25) or SJS (p = .4). However, there were significant increases in attitudes toward S/R integration (p < .001) and SJS during the SCT-MH curriculum (p < .001). In neither arm did interest single-item scores on pursuing MH graduate school (p = .68) or vocationally (p = .05) increase. While not causal, these increases during SCT-MH regarding attitudes toward S/R MH integration and social justice attitudes and behaviors are noteworthy. Further extension using vocational assessment, longitudinal and experimental designs, and diverse multisite samples are needed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).

将灵性和宗教性(S/R)纳入精神健康(MH)治疗符合我们的道德规范和专业指南,可以促进治疗效果。在专业临床医生和研究生的样本中,越来越多的证据表明,MH课程中的灵性能力训练(SCT-MH; Pearce et al., 2019)可能会解决这一交叉领域缺乏培训的问题。然而,需要对支持职业发展的本科生和从事研究生或本科水平心理健康工作的本科生进行SCT-MH评估。在这项探索性教学研究中,我们使用了一系列重复测量方差分析来评估本科生(N = 39)对S/R整合到MH量表的态度子量表(Oxhandler & Parrish, 2016)、社会公正量表(SJS; Torres-Harding等,2012)的态度,以及专注于在一如既往的教学和SCT-MH课程中追求以MH为重点的学位后工作的单项量表。在正常教学期间,学生在S/R整合(p = 0.25)和SJS (p = 0.4)方面的态度得分没有显著增加。然而,在SCT-MH课程中,对S/R整合(p < 0.001)和SJS的态度显著增加(p < 0.001)。在两组中,追求MH研究生院(p = 0.68)或职业(p = 0.05)的兴趣单项得分均未增加。虽然不是因果关系,但在SCT-MH期间,对S/R MH整合的态度和社会正义态度和行为的这些增加值得注意。需要使用职业评估、纵向和实验设计以及不同的多地点样本进行进一步扩展。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2026 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Examining two pedagogical methods on attitudes toward religiousness within mental health and social justice in an undergraduate course.","authors":"Craig A Warlick, Calista A Spears","doi":"10.1037/pst0000613","DOIUrl":"10.1037/pst0000613","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Integrating spirituality and religiousness (S/R) into mental health (MH) treatment aligns with our ethics codes and professional guidelines, and it can promote therapeutic outcomes. There is emerging evidence among samples of professional clinicians and graduate students that the Spirituality Competency Training in MH curriculum (SCT-MH; Pearce et al., 2019) may address the dearth of training in this intersection. However, SCT-MH needs to be assessed among undergraduates to support vocational development and those who pursue graduate school or bachelor-level mental health work. In this exploratory pedagogical study, we used a series of repeated measures analyses of variance to assess undergraduate students' (<i>N</i> = 39) attitudes toward a revised version of the Attitudes subscale of the S/R integration into MH Scale (Oxhandler & Parrish, 2016), the Social Justice Scale (SJS; Torres-Harding et al., 2012), and single-item scales focused on pursuing MH-focused work postdegree across teaching-as-usual and SCT-MH curricula. During teaching-as-usual, there were no significant increases in attitude scores regarding S/R integration (<i>p</i> = .25) or SJS (<i>p</i> = .4). However, there were significant increases in attitudes toward S/R integration (<i>p</i> < .001) and SJS during the SCT-MH curriculum (<i>p</i> < .001). In neither arm did interest single-item scores on pursuing MH graduate school (<i>p</i> = .68) or vocationally (<i>p</i> = .05) increase. While not causal, these increases during SCT-MH regarding attitudes toward S/R MH integration and social justice attitudes and behaviors are noteworthy. Further extension using vocational assessment, longitudinal and experimental designs, and diverse multisite samples are needed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20910,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146012132","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Parsing the within- and between-therapist positive regard-outcome association in cognitive-behavioral therapy for generalized anxiety disorder. 分析广泛性焦虑障碍认知行为治疗中治疗师内部和治疗师之间积极关注与结果的关联。
IF 3.9 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-09 DOI: 10.1037/pst0000606
Anuj H P Mehta, Michael J Constantino, Alice E Coyne, Averi N Gaines, Henny A Westra, Martin M Antony

Positive regard (PR)-rated from multiple perspectives across diverse psychotherapies-correlates positively with patient improvement. Yet, existing research has generally not parsed this total correlation into its within- and between-therapist components, which limits its interpretability. Thus, the present study explored (a) the association between positive regard and outcome at both the within- and between-therapist levels, (b) whether between-therapist differences in positive regard moderated the within-therapist positive regard-outcome association, and (c) whether treatment condition (cognitive-behavioral therapy [CBT] vs. CBT that integrated client-centered principles) moderated either level of the positive regard-outcome association. Adults with generalized anxiety disorder were randomly assigned to CBT alone (n = 49) or CBT integrated with motivational interviewing (MI-CBT; n = 52) to responsively address patient resistance (Westra et al., 2016). Ten therapists treated patients in CBT only, and nine distinct therapists treated patients in MI-CBT only. Patients rated therapist-offered positive regard repeatedly across 15 sessions and their worry and general distress outcomes at baseline and posttreatment. Multilevel structural equation modeling revealed a significant association between patients' experience of higher early treatment positive regard and lower posttreatment worry and general distress at the within-therapist level. There was no between-therapist association for either outcome. Additionally, neither between-therapist positive regard nor treatment condition moderated the within-therapist effect of positive regard on either outcome. Results underscore the value of therapists working to foster their patients' felt regard irrespective of the treatment they use or the general ability they have in cultivating this relational experience. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

积极关注(PR)-从不同心理治疗的多个角度评估-与患者的改善呈正相关。然而,现有的研究通常没有将这种整体相关性解析为治疗师内部和治疗师之间的成分,这限制了其可解释性。因此,本研究探讨了(a)治疗师内部和治疗师之间积极关注与结果之间的关联,(b)治疗师之间积极关注的差异是否调节了治疗师内部积极关注与结果之间的关联,以及(c)治疗条件(认知行为治疗[CBT]与整合客户中心原则的CBT)是否调节了积极关注与结果之间的关联。患有广广性焦虑症的成年人被随机分配到单独的CBT组(n = 49)或CBT结合动机性访谈组(MI-CBT; n = 52),以响应性地解决患者的抵抗(Westra et al., 2016)。10名治疗师仅以CBT治疗患者,9名不同的治疗师仅以MI-CBT治疗患者。患者在15个疗程中反复评价治疗师提供的积极关注,以及他们在基线和治疗后的担忧和一般痛苦结果。多层结构方程模型揭示了患者在治疗早期较高的积极关注与治疗后较低的担忧和一般痛苦之间的显著关联。两种结果均无治疗师间关联。此外,治疗师之间的积极关注和治疗条件都没有调节治疗师内部积极关注对任何结果的影响。结果强调了治疗师的价值,不管他们使用的治疗方法或他们在培养这种关系体验方面的一般能力如何,他们都在努力培养病人的感觉尊重。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Parsing the within- and between-therapist positive regard-outcome association in cognitive-behavioral therapy for generalized anxiety disorder.","authors":"Anuj H P Mehta, Michael J Constantino, Alice E Coyne, Averi N Gaines, Henny A Westra, Martin M Antony","doi":"10.1037/pst0000606","DOIUrl":"10.1037/pst0000606","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Positive regard (PR)-rated from multiple perspectives across diverse psychotherapies-correlates positively with patient improvement. Yet, existing research has generally not parsed this total correlation into its within- and between-therapist components, which limits its interpretability. Thus, the present study explored (a) the association between positive regard and outcome at both the within- and between-therapist levels, (b) whether between-therapist differences in positive regard moderated the within-therapist positive regard-outcome association, and (c) whether treatment condition (cognitive-behavioral therapy [CBT] vs. CBT that integrated client-centered principles) moderated either level of the positive regard-outcome association. Adults with generalized anxiety disorder were randomly assigned to CBT alone (<i>n</i> = 49) or CBT integrated with motivational interviewing (MI-CBT; <i>n</i> = 52) to responsively address patient resistance (Westra et al., 2016). Ten therapists treated patients in CBT only, and nine distinct therapists treated patients in MI-CBT only. Patients rated therapist-offered positive regard repeatedly across 15 sessions and their worry and general distress outcomes at baseline and posttreatment. Multilevel structural equation modeling revealed a significant association between patients' experience of higher early treatment positive regard and lower posttreatment worry and general distress at the within-therapist level. There was no between-therapist association for either outcome. Additionally, neither between-therapist positive regard nor treatment condition moderated the within-therapist effect of positive regard on either outcome. Results underscore the value of therapists working to foster their patients' felt regard irrespective of the treatment they use or the general ability they have in cultivating this relational experience. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20910,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"474-485"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145258886","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Is employment status associated with baseline symptoms, engagement, and outcomes in naturalistic psychotherapy? Evaluation in a large community mental health agency. 在自然主义心理治疗中,就业状况是否与基线症状、参与和结果有关?某大型社区心理健康机构的评估。
IF 3.9 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-04 DOI: 10.1037/pst0000597
Zishan Jiwani, Qiang Xie, John J Curtin, Kevin M Riordan, Robbie Babins-Wagner, Derek Caperton, Mindi N Thompson, Simon B Goldberg

Employment status, an essential socioeconomic factor, may be an important driver of disparities in mental health and access to treatment. However, prior research has been inconclusive and utilized broad employment categories. The present study investigated the associations between various types of employment status and baseline symptomology, psychotherapy engagement, and psychotherapy outcomes. We examined 27,258 patients (Mage = 32.54; 62.9% female; 75.8% White) who attended 115,936 psychotherapy sessions at a Canadian mental health agency between January 2014 and July 2022. Employment status was categorized into nine distinct groups (e.g., full-time, part-time, unemployed and looking for work, unemployed not looking for work, and retirement). Multilevel models examined the association between employment status and baseline symptoms, psychotherapy engagement (e.g., total sessions, early termination), and outcomes (e.g., symptom change). Patients who were unemployed (both looking for and not looking for work) reported higher baseline symptoms and increased odds of suicide concern compared to patients with full-time employment. Contrary to our preregistered hypotheses, patients who were unemployed attended more sessions and showed no significant differences in symptom change or trajectory of change compared to those employed full-time. Retirement was linked to lower baseline symptomology, and both retirement and full-time student status were associated with slower trajectories of change relative to full-time employment. Findings suggest that unemployment is associated with worse baseline mental health but does not hinder psychotherapy engagement and effectiveness. Ensuring accessibility of psychotherapy for unemployed individuals is crucial, given their heightened risk of psychological distress. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

就业状况是一个重要的社会经济因素,可能是心理健康和获得治疗方面存在差异的重要驱动因素。然而,先前的研究是不确定的,并且使用了广泛的就业类别。本研究调查了不同类型的就业状况与基线症状、心理治疗参与和心理治疗结果之间的关系。我们检查了27,258例患者(Mage = 32.54;62.9%的女性;75.8%白人),他们在2014年1月至2022年7月期间在加拿大一家心理健康机构参加了115936次心理治疗。就业状况被分为9个不同的群体(如全职、兼职、失业和找工作、失业不找工作和退休)。多层模型检验了就业状况与基线症状、心理治疗参与(如总疗程、早期终止)和结果(如症状改变)之间的关系。与有全职工作的患者相比,失业(包括找工作和不找工作)的患者报告的基线症状更高,自杀担忧的几率也更高。与我们预先登记的假设相反,失业的患者参加了更多的会议,与全职工作的患者相比,在症状变化或变化轨迹上没有显着差异。退休与较低的基线症状有关,退休和全日制学生身份都与相对于全职工作的较慢的变化轨迹有关。研究结果表明,失业与较差的基线心理健康有关,但并不妨碍心理治疗的参与和有效性。鉴于失业人员心理困扰的风险较高,确保他们获得心理治疗至关重要。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Is employment status associated with baseline symptoms, engagement, and outcomes in naturalistic psychotherapy? Evaluation in a large community mental health agency.","authors":"Zishan Jiwani, Qiang Xie, John J Curtin, Kevin M Riordan, Robbie Babins-Wagner, Derek Caperton, Mindi N Thompson, Simon B Goldberg","doi":"10.1037/pst0000597","DOIUrl":"10.1037/pst0000597","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Employment status, an essential socioeconomic factor, may be an important driver of disparities in mental health and access to treatment. However, prior research has been inconclusive and utilized broad employment categories. The present study investigated the associations between various types of employment status and baseline symptomology, psychotherapy engagement, and psychotherapy outcomes. We examined 27,258 patients (<i>M</i>age = 32.54; 62.9% female; 75.8% White) who attended 115,936 psychotherapy sessions at a Canadian mental health agency between January 2014 and July 2022. Employment status was categorized into nine distinct groups (e.g., full-time, part-time, unemployed and looking for work, unemployed not looking for work, and retirement). Multilevel models examined the association between employment status and baseline symptoms, psychotherapy engagement (e.g., total sessions, early termination), and outcomes (e.g., symptom change). Patients who were unemployed (both looking for and not looking for work) reported higher baseline symptoms and increased odds of suicide concern compared to patients with full-time employment. Contrary to our preregistered hypotheses, patients who were unemployed attended more sessions and showed no significant differences in symptom change or trajectory of change compared to those employed full-time. Retirement was linked to lower baseline symptomology, and both retirement and full-time student status were associated with slower trajectories of change relative to full-time employment. Findings suggest that unemployment is associated with worse baseline mental health but does not hinder psychotherapy engagement and effectiveness. Ensuring accessibility of psychotherapy for unemployed individuals is crucial, given their heightened risk of psychological distress. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20910,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"495-508"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12327771/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144776059","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Black clients' perceptions of therapists' cultural comfort, alliance, and outcome and the discussion of anti-Black racism in psychotherapy. 黑人来访者对治疗师文化舒适、联盟和结果的感知以及心理治疗中反黑人种族主义的讨论。
IF 3.9 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-28 DOI: 10.1037/pst0000598
Theodore T Bartholomew, Emma Smith, Andrés E Pérez-Rojas, Krista A Robbins, Eileen E Joy, Mukasa Mubirumusoke

Prior scholarship has helped demonstrate therapists' perceptions of the value of discussing anti-Black racism with Black clients in a manner that espouses cultural comfort or the ability to be at ease when discussing lived experiences related to clients' culture during treatment. Better understanding cultural comfort, an aspect of multicultural orientation, when discussing anti-Black racism with Black clients could help clarify paths by which psychotherapy does not perpetuate harm reflected in the dehumanization of such racism. However, Black clients' perspectives are missing in the literature. As such, we collected data from 153 Black participants with recent therapy experiences. They were asked about discussing anti-Black racism during therapy, satisfaction/helpfulness of these conversations, and items related to initiation and frequency of such discussions. Participants also completed measures of cultural comfort, working alliance, and perceived outcome. Perceived therapist cultural comfort did not significantly vary if anti-Black racism was discussed, and discussing anti-Black racism did not moderate the relationship between cultural comfort and working alliance or cultural comfort and outcome. Satisfaction and helpfulness positively correlated with cultural comfort. Cultural comfort scores also varied by who initiated these conversations and their frequency. We contextualize these findings in a need for greater nuance with respect to examining discussions of racism in psychotherapy and consider our findings with respect to broaching literature. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

先前的学术研究已经帮助证明了治疗师对与黑人来访者讨论反黑人种族主义的价值的看法,这种方式支持文化舒适,或者在治疗期间讨论与来访者文化相关的生活经历时能够轻松自在。在与黑人来访者讨论反黑人种族主义时,更好地理解文化舒适,这是多元文化取向的一个方面,可以帮助明确心理治疗不会使这种种族主义的非人性化所反映的伤害永久化的途径。然而,黑人客户的观点在文献中缺失。因此,我们收集了153名最近接受过治疗的黑人参与者的数据。他们被问及在治疗期间讨论反黑人种族主义,这些谈话的满意度/有用性,以及与此类讨论的开始和频率相关的项目。参与者还完成了文化舒适度、工作联盟和感知结果的测量。当讨论反黑人种族主义时,感知治疗师的文化舒适度没有显著差异,讨论反黑人种族主义并没有调节文化舒适度与工作联盟或文化舒适度与结果的关系。满意度、乐于助人与文化舒适度正相关。文化舒适度得分也因对话发起者和频率而异。我们将这些发现置于需要更细微差别的背景中,以检查心理治疗中的种族主义讨论,并将我们的发现与讨论文献相结合。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Black clients' perceptions of therapists' cultural comfort, alliance, and outcome and the discussion of anti-Black racism in psychotherapy.","authors":"Theodore T Bartholomew, Emma Smith, Andrés E Pérez-Rojas, Krista A Robbins, Eileen E Joy, Mukasa Mubirumusoke","doi":"10.1037/pst0000598","DOIUrl":"10.1037/pst0000598","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Prior scholarship has helped demonstrate therapists' perceptions of the value of discussing anti-Black racism with Black clients in a manner that espouses cultural comfort or the ability to be at ease when discussing lived experiences related to clients' culture during treatment. Better understanding cultural comfort, an aspect of multicultural orientation, when discussing anti-Black racism with Black clients could help clarify paths by which psychotherapy does not perpetuate harm reflected in the dehumanization of such racism. However, Black clients' perspectives are missing in the literature. As such, we collected data from 153 Black participants with recent therapy experiences. They were asked about discussing anti-Black racism during therapy, satisfaction/helpfulness of these conversations, and items related to initiation and frequency of such discussions. Participants also completed measures of cultural comfort, working alliance, and perceived outcome. Perceived therapist cultural comfort did not significantly vary if anti-Black racism was discussed, and discussing anti-Black racism did not moderate the relationship between cultural comfort and working alliance or cultural comfort and outcome. Satisfaction and helpfulness positively correlated with cultural comfort. Cultural comfort scores also varied by who initiated these conversations and their frequency. We contextualize these findings in a need for greater nuance with respect to examining discussions of racism in psychotherapy and consider our findings with respect to broaching literature. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20910,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"529-536"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144966487","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Therapist personality factors as predictors of between-therapist effectiveness differences. 治疗师人格因素作为治疗师效能差异的预测因子。
IF 3.9 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-31 DOI: 10.1037/pst0000591
Michael J Constantino, Averi N Gaines, Alice E Coyne, Henricus L Van, Anuj H P Mehta, Jaap Peen, Frank J Don, Jack J M Dekker, Ellen Driessen

Abundant research across various treatments indicates that therapists can differ in their general, caseload-level effectiveness. However, relatively little is known about therapist factors that predict such "performance" variability. Moreover, most of the limited existing work on this topic has relied on demographic and professional convenience variables, which have demonstrated low predictive power. Thus, it is possible that therapist effectiveness differences would be better explained by personality characteristics that are inescapably present in a clinician's work. Addressing this question, the present preregistered study preliminarily explored whether more versus less effective therapists possess more adaptive personality traits among the "big five," defense style maturity, and psychological mindedness. Data were derived from a randomized clinical trial comparing the efficacy of 16 sessions of cognitive behavioral therapy and psychodynamic therapy for depression (Driessen et al., 2013). Effective sample participants were 142 adult outpatients treated by 32 therapists nested within the treatment condition. Therapists completed multiple personality measures, and patients' depression and global distress symptoms were assessed (via self-report or observer ratings) at baseline and posttreatment. Despite there being significant between-therapist effectiveness differences (on their average patient's posttreatment outcome), multilevel models revealed no significant associations between personality characteristics and such differences on any outcome. It may be that therapists' overall effectiveness has more to do with their transferable actions in the room versus traits they bring into their work. Alternatively, certain traits may predict between-therapist effects but only in specific treatment, patient, and/or cultural contexts that differ from the ones herein. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

对各种治疗方法的大量研究表明,治疗师在一般情况下的工作量水平上的有效性可能有所不同。然而,对预测这种“表现”可变性的治疗师因素所知相对较少。此外,关于该主题的大多数有限的现有工作都依赖于人口统计和专业便利变量,这些变量显示出较低的预测能力。因此,临床医生工作中不可避免地存在的人格特征可能会更好地解释治疗师有效性的差异。针对这一问题,本预注册研究初步探讨了在“五大”、防御风格成熟度和心理心态中,更有效的治疗师与更不有效的治疗师是否具有更多的适应性人格特征。数据来源于一项随机临床试验,比较了16次认知行为疗法和心理动力疗法对抑郁症的疗效(Driessen et al., 2013)。有效样本参与者为142名成年门诊患者,由32名治疗师在治疗条件内嵌套治疗。治疗师完成多重人格测量,并在基线和治疗后评估患者的抑郁和整体困扰症状(通过自我报告或观察者评分)。尽管治疗师之间存在显著的有效性差异(在他们的平均患者治疗后结果上),但多层次模型显示人格特征与任何结果的差异之间没有显著的关联。也许,治疗师的整体有效性更多地与他们在房间里的可转移行为有关,而不是他们在工作中带来的特质。或者,某些特征可以预测治疗师之间的效果,但仅在特定的治疗、患者和/或与本文不同的文化背景下。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Therapist personality factors as predictors of between-therapist effectiveness differences.","authors":"Michael J Constantino, Averi N Gaines, Alice E Coyne, Henricus L Van, Anuj H P Mehta, Jaap Peen, Frank J Don, Jack J M Dekker, Ellen Driessen","doi":"10.1037/pst0000591","DOIUrl":"10.1037/pst0000591","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Abundant research across various treatments indicates that therapists can differ in their general, caseload-level effectiveness. However, relatively little is known about therapist factors that predict such \"performance\" variability. Moreover, most of the limited existing work on this topic has relied on demographic and professional convenience variables, which have demonstrated low predictive power. Thus, it is possible that therapist effectiveness differences would be better explained by personality characteristics that are inescapably present in a clinician's work. Addressing this question, the present preregistered study preliminarily explored whether more versus less effective therapists possess more adaptive personality traits among the \"big five,\" defense style maturity, and psychological mindedness. Data were derived from a randomized clinical trial comparing the efficacy of 16 sessions of cognitive behavioral therapy and psychodynamic therapy for depression (Driessen et al., 2013). Effective sample participants were 142 adult outpatients treated by 32 therapists nested within the treatment condition. Therapists completed multiple personality measures, and patients' depression and global distress symptoms were assessed (via self-report or observer ratings) at baseline and posttreatment. Despite there being significant between-therapist effectiveness differences (on their average patient's posttreatment outcome), multilevel models revealed no significant associations between personality characteristics and such differences on any outcome. It may be that therapists' overall effectiveness has more to do with their transferable actions <i>in the room</i> versus traits they bring into their work. Alternatively, certain traits may predict between-therapist effects but only in specific treatment, patient, and/or cultural contexts that differ from the ones herein. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20910,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"509-517"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144761147","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Applying a theory of change approach to evaluating evidence for circle of security interventions: A systematic review. 应用变化理论方法评估安全干预圈的证据:系统回顾。
IF 3.9 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-21 DOI: 10.1037/pst0000592
Erinn Hawkins, Brittnee Byron, Anna Huber, Nicole Perry, Catherine McMahon, Neil W Boris

Circle of Security (COS) interventions aim to improve parent-child relationships. Preliminary evidence of the effectiveness of COS interventions has been positive, but recent studies suggest mixed results that may be due to a lack of differentiation between different versions of COS interventions. This systematic review used a theory of change/program logic approach to summarize the evidence for COS interventions and to explore the conditions under which each protocol was most effective. A comprehensive systematic literature search was conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines for studies administering a verified COS intervention protocol with parents/caregivers of children aged 0-8 years. Studies were coded for study design, protocol type, sample characteristics, treatment fidelity, dose, risk of bias, and type of outcome. Nineteen eligible studies were included; seven were randomized controlled trials. Studies of the higher dose protocols (i.e., COS-Intensive, COS-Intensive-Revised Hybrid, COS-Perinatal Protocol) showed promising results across primary and secondary parent outcomes, longer term relationship and child outcomes, and clinical samples. Results showed mixed evidence for the efficacy of the more scalable COS-Parenting. Reviewing studies according to the theory of change/program logic suggested three sources of variability in COS-Parenting studies compared to the higher dose COS interventions that could impact outcome: treatment dose/strategies, sample type, and treatment fidelity. Differential effectiveness of COS interventions tested in seven randomized controlled trials, two nonrandomized controlled trials, and 10 single-arm trials suggests that different COS variants may be better suited to different target populations. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

安全圈(COS)干预旨在改善亲子关系。COS干预措施有效性的初步证据是积极的,但最近的研究表明,可能由于不同版本的COS干预措施之间缺乏区分,结果好坏参半。本系统综述使用了变革/程序逻辑理论方法来总结COS干预措施的证据,并探索每种方案最有效的条件。对0-8岁儿童的父母/照顾者实施经验证的COS干预方案的研究,按照系统评价和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目进行了全面的系统文献检索。研究根据研究设计、方案类型、样本特征、治疗保真度、剂量、偏倚风险和结果类型进行编码。纳入了19项符合条件的研究;其中7项为随机对照试验。对高剂量方案(即COS-Intensive、COS-Intensive- revised Hybrid、cos -围产期方案)的研究显示,在主要和次要父母结局、长期关系和儿童结局以及临床样本方面,都有令人鼓舞的结果。结果显示,对于更具可扩展性的COS-Parenting的有效性,证据不一。根据变化/程序逻辑理论回顾研究表明,与可能影响结果的高剂量COS干预相比,COS- parenting研究中的变异性有三个来源:治疗剂量/策略、样本类型和治疗保真度。7项随机对照试验、2项非随机对照试验和10项单臂试验测试了COS干预措施的不同效果,表明不同的COS变体可能更适合不同的目标人群。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Applying a theory of change approach to evaluating evidence for circle of security interventions: A systematic review.","authors":"Erinn Hawkins, Brittnee Byron, Anna Huber, Nicole Perry, Catherine McMahon, Neil W Boris","doi":"10.1037/pst0000592","DOIUrl":"10.1037/pst0000592","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Circle of Security (COS) interventions aim to improve parent-child relationships. Preliminary evidence of the effectiveness of COS interventions has been positive, but recent studies suggest mixed results that may be due to a lack of differentiation between different versions of COS interventions. This systematic review used a theory of change/program logic approach to summarize the evidence for COS interventions and to explore the conditions under which each protocol was most effective. A comprehensive systematic literature search was conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines for studies administering a verified COS intervention protocol with parents/caregivers of children aged 0-8 years. Studies were coded for study design, protocol type, sample characteristics, treatment fidelity, dose, risk of bias, and type of outcome. Nineteen eligible studies were included; seven were randomized controlled trials. Studies of the higher dose protocols (i.e., COS-Intensive, COS-Intensive-Revised Hybrid, COS-Perinatal Protocol) showed promising results across primary and secondary parent outcomes, longer term relationship and child outcomes, and clinical samples. Results showed mixed evidence for the efficacy of the more scalable COS-Parenting. Reviewing studies according to the theory of change/program logic suggested three sources of variability in COS-Parenting studies compared to the higher dose COS interventions that could impact outcome: treatment dose/strategies, sample type, and treatment fidelity. Differential effectiveness of COS interventions tested in seven randomized controlled trials, two nonrandomized controlled trials, and 10 single-arm trials suggests that different COS variants may be better suited to different target populations. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20910,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"445-456"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144675568","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Rumination in response to repugnant obsessions: Catching the sneakiest of compulsions. 对令人反感的强迫反应的反刍:捕捉最隐秘的强迫。
IF 3.9 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-10 DOI: 10.1037/pst0000585
Jean-Philippe Gagné, Shiu F Wong

Rumination is a mental process characterized by the repetitive analysis of concerns without taking concrete or helpful action. It has been shown to be transdiagnostic, contributing to the maintenance and exacerbation of symptoms across various mental disorders, including obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Historically conceptualized as part of the obsessional domain due to its repetitive and intrusive qualities, rumination is now better understood as a covert compulsion-one that reinforces the overimportance of otherwise normal, unwanted intrusions, particularly in the case of repugnant obsessions. Consequently, it is crucial for clinicians to frame rumination as a mental habit or behavior in which individuals with OCD attempt to understand the causes, meaning, and consequences of their thoughts. This unproductive and time-consuming process not only amplifies intrusive doubts but also worsens mood, placing individuals at high risk for comorbid depression. This article outlines how rumination fits within the cognitive-behavioral model of OCD and, more importantly, offers practical refinements to standard cognitive-behavioral therapy interventions, drawing from evidence-based strategies for OCD and related disorders as well as from behavioral activation. The aim is to better equip clinicians with tools to effectively target rumination in OCD, particularly in presentations involving repugnant obsessions. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

反刍是一种心理过程,其特点是反复分析所关注的问题,而不采取具体或有益的行动。它已被证明是跨诊断的,有助于维持和加剧各种精神障碍的症状,包括强迫症(强迫症)。由于其重复性和侵入性,反刍在历史上被定义为强迫性领域的一部分,现在被更好地理解为一种隐蔽的强迫——它强化了正常的、不必要的侵入的过度重要性,特别是在令人反感的强迫性的情况下。因此,对于临床医生来说,将反刍作为一种心理习惯或行为是至关重要的,在这种习惯或行为中,强迫症患者试图理解他们思想的原因、意义和后果。这种低效且耗时的过程不仅放大了侵入性的疑虑,还恶化了情绪,使个人处于患共病抑郁症的高风险之中。这篇文章概述了反刍如何适应强迫症的认知行为模型,更重要的是,从强迫症和相关疾病的循证策略以及行为激活中,为标准的认知行为治疗干预提供了实用的改进。其目的是为临床医生提供更好的工具,以有效地针对强迫症中的反刍,特别是在涉及令人反感的强迫行为的演讲中。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Rumination in response to repugnant obsessions: Catching the sneakiest of compulsions.","authors":"Jean-Philippe Gagné, Shiu F Wong","doi":"10.1037/pst0000585","DOIUrl":"10.1037/pst0000585","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Rumination is a mental process characterized by the repetitive analysis of concerns without taking concrete or helpful action. It has been shown to be transdiagnostic, contributing to the maintenance and exacerbation of symptoms across various mental disorders, including obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Historically conceptualized as part of the obsessional domain due to its repetitive and intrusive qualities, rumination is now better understood as a covert compulsion-one that reinforces the overimportance of otherwise normal, unwanted intrusions, particularly in the case of repugnant obsessions. Consequently, it is crucial for clinicians to frame rumination as a mental habit or behavior in which individuals with OCD attempt to understand the causes, meaning, and consequences of their thoughts. This unproductive and time-consuming process not only amplifies intrusive doubts but also worsens mood, placing individuals at high risk for comorbid depression. This article outlines how rumination fits within the cognitive-behavioral model of OCD and, more importantly, offers practical refinements to standard cognitive-behavioral therapy interventions, drawing from evidence-based strategies for OCD and related disorders as well as from behavioral activation. The aim is to better equip clinicians with tools to effectively target rumination in OCD, particularly in presentations involving repugnant obsessions. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20910,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"518-528"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144609168","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Core principles of treating the suicidal adult: What we have learned from patients about restoring safety, emotion regulation, mentalizing, and epistemic trust. 治疗成人自杀的核心原则:我们从病人身上学到的关于恢复安全感、情绪调节、心智化和认知信任的知识。
IF 3.9 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-15 DOI: 10.1037/pst0000601
J Christopher Fowler, Stuart Weir, William H Orme

Treating the suicidal patient is a risky, often emotionally exhausting process that strains the best therapist's capacity to maintain the primary focus of psychotherapy. When fear, desperation, and urgency to resolve the suicidal state become overwhelming, therapists and patients can get lost in protracted power struggles and crisis management (Plakun, 2001). Starting from the proposition that suicidal states are primarily driven by overwhelming affective experiences (Maltsberger, 2004), the authors expand upon an earlier clinical article (Fowler, 2013) to include new facets of interventions accompanied by clinical vignettes. Targeted research findings supporting these core interventions follow each vignette. Therapists are encouraged to flexibly shift among clinical interventions while carefully monitoring the emotional state and responsivity of the patient: (a) creating a sense of interpersonal safety in the therapy dyad; (b) coregulation of emotion utilizing mentalization-based therapy interventions (Bateman & Fonagy, 2016) and elements of therapeutic presence (Geller & Porges, 2014); (c) enhancing mentalizing by modeling curiosity about suicidal states of mind (Allen, 2011; Bateman & Fonagy, 2016); (d) identifying meaning(s) and pattern(s) that precipitate suicidal states; and (e) aiding the patient in fostering an enduring sense of trust. While informed by attachment theory, mentalization-based therapy, and polyvagal theory, these interventions are best conceptualized as common factors and can be utilized in conjunction with third-wave cognitive behavioral therapy, interpersonal, and integrative approaches. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

治疗有自杀倾向的病人是一个有风险的、常常会让人情绪疲惫的过程,它会使最好的治疗师难以维持心理治疗的主要焦点。当恐惧、绝望和解决自杀状态的紧迫性变得压倒性时,治疗师和患者可能会在旷日持久的权力斗争和危机管理中迷失方向(Plakun, 2001)。从自杀状态主要是由压倒性的情感体验驱动的这一观点出发(Maltsberger, 2004),作者扩展了早期的一篇临床文章(Fowler, 2013),包括新的干预方面,并伴有临床小插曲。支持这些核心干预措施的有针对性的研究结果遵循每个小插曲。治疗师被鼓励灵活地在临床干预措施之间转换,同时仔细监测患者的情绪状态和反应:(a)在治疗中创造一种人际安全感;(b)利用基于心理的治疗干预(Bateman & Fonagy, 2016)和治疗在场元素(Geller & Porges, 2014)对情绪进行协同调节;(c)通过模拟对自杀心理状态的好奇心来增强心理化(Allen, 2011; Bateman & Fonagy, 2016);(d)识别导致自杀状态的意义和模式;(e)帮助病人培养持久的信任感。根据依恋理论、基于心理的治疗和多迷走神经理论,这些干预措施最好被概念化为共同因素,可以与第三波认知行为治疗、人际关系治疗和综合治疗方法结合使用。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Core principles of treating the suicidal adult: What we have learned from patients about restoring safety, emotion regulation, mentalizing, and epistemic trust.","authors":"J Christopher Fowler, Stuart Weir, William H Orme","doi":"10.1037/pst0000601","DOIUrl":"10.1037/pst0000601","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Treating the suicidal patient is a risky, often emotionally exhausting process that strains the best therapist's capacity to maintain the primary focus of psychotherapy. When fear, desperation, and urgency to resolve the suicidal state become overwhelming, therapists and patients can get lost in protracted power struggles and crisis management (Plakun, 2001). Starting from the proposition that suicidal states are primarily driven by overwhelming affective experiences (Maltsberger, 2004), the authors expand upon an earlier clinical article (Fowler, 2013) to include new facets of interventions accompanied by clinical vignettes. Targeted research findings supporting these core interventions follow each vignette. Therapists are encouraged to flexibly shift among clinical interventions while carefully monitoring the emotional state and responsivity of the patient: (a) creating a sense of interpersonal safety in the therapy dyad; (b) coregulation of emotion utilizing mentalization-based therapy interventions (Bateman & Fonagy, 2016) and elements of therapeutic presence (Geller & Porges, 2014); (c) enhancing mentalizing by modeling curiosity about suicidal states of mind (Allen, 2011; Bateman & Fonagy, 2016); (d) identifying meaning(s) and pattern(s) that precipitate suicidal states; and (e) aiding the patient in fostering an enduring sense of trust. While informed by attachment theory, mentalization-based therapy, and polyvagal theory, these interventions are best conceptualized as common factors and can be utilized in conjunction with third-wave cognitive behavioral therapy, interpersonal, and integrative approaches. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20910,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"433-444"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145064975","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A comparison of patients' preferences for psychotherapy with psychotherapists' preferences for delivering psychotherapy in China. 中国患者心理治疗偏好与心理治疗师提供心理治疗偏好的比较。
IF 3.9 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-08 DOI: 10.1037/pst0000600
Zhuang She, Mick Cooper, Gina Di Malta

Despite the evidence indicating that accommodating preferences leads to better outcomes, we currently know very little about what psychotherapists prefer to deliver and whether this matches patient preferences. This research aimed to understand the degree of mismatching between patients' preferences in psychotherapy and psychotherapists' preferred psychotherapy delivery in Chinese clinical contexts. We utilized three samples from two different Chinese clinical contexts. Study 1 consisted of two independent samples of patients (N = 301) and psychotherapists (N = 1,054). The Cooper-Norcross Inventory of Preferences patient and therapist versions were administered to assess preferences. In Study 2, a paired patient-psychotherapist sample (Npsychotherapists = 155, Npatients = 3,060) was used to replicate Study 1 findings. Results from both studies indicated two significant areas of mismatch. First, psychotherapists had a stronger preference for their patients to take the lead in psychotherapy when compared with lay patients (d = 0.74∼0.82). Second, psychotherapists showed a stronger preference for emotional intensity than patients (d = 0.57∼0.62). These differences were relatively consistent across psychotherapists' theoretical orientations and personal psychotherapy experiences, with some variation linked to psychotherapists' clinical experience. Psychotherapists' preferred delivery styles, as compared with patients' actual preferences, are consistent with psychotherapists' own preferences (as patients) and may reflect a false consensus bias. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

尽管有证据表明,适应偏好会带来更好的结果,但我们目前对心理治疗师更喜欢提供什么以及这是否符合患者的偏好知之甚少。本研究旨在了解中国临床背景下患者心理治疗偏好与心理治疗师首选心理治疗递送的不匹配程度。我们使用了来自两种不同中国临床背景的三份样本。研究1包括两个独立的患者样本(N = 301)和心理治疗师样本(N = 1054)。采用库珀-诺克罗斯偏好量表(Cooper-Norcross Inventory of Preferences)对患者和治疗师进行偏好评估。在研究2中,配对患者-心理治疗师样本(Npsychotherapists = 155, Npatients = 3060)被用来重复研究1的发现。两项研究的结果都表明了两个显著的不匹配区域。首先,与非专业患者相比,心理治疗师更倾向于患者在心理治疗中发挥主导作用(d = 0.74 ~ 0.82)。其次,心理治疗师表现出比患者更强烈的情绪强度偏好(d = 0.57 ~ 0.62)。这些差异在心理治疗师的理论取向和个人心理治疗经历中相对一致,其中一些差异与心理治疗师的临床经验有关。与患者的实际偏好相比,心理治疗师的首选递送方式与心理治疗师自己(作为患者)的偏好一致,可能反映了错误的共识偏见。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"A comparison of patients' preferences for psychotherapy with psychotherapists' preferences for delivering psychotherapy in China.","authors":"Zhuang She, Mick Cooper, Gina Di Malta","doi":"10.1037/pst0000600","DOIUrl":"10.1037/pst0000600","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite the evidence indicating that accommodating preferences leads to better outcomes, we currently know very little about what psychotherapists prefer to deliver and whether this matches patient preferences. This research aimed to understand the degree of mismatching between patients' preferences in psychotherapy and psychotherapists' preferred psychotherapy delivery in Chinese clinical contexts. We utilized three samples from two different Chinese clinical contexts. Study 1 consisted of two independent samples of patients (<i>N</i> = 301) and psychotherapists (<i>N</i> = 1,054). The Cooper-Norcross Inventory of Preferences patient and therapist versions were administered to assess preferences. In Study 2, a paired patient-psychotherapist sample (<i>N</i><sub>psychotherapists</sub> = 155, <i>N</i><sub>patients</sub> = 3,060) was used to replicate Study 1 findings. Results from both studies indicated two significant areas of mismatch. First, psychotherapists had a stronger preference for their patients to take the lead in psychotherapy when compared with lay patients (<i>d</i> = 0.74∼0.82). Second, psychotherapists showed a stronger preference for emotional intensity than patients (<i>d</i> = 0.57∼0.62). These differences were relatively consistent across psychotherapists' theoretical orientations and personal psychotherapy experiences, with some variation linked to psychotherapists' clinical experience. Psychotherapists' preferred delivery styles, as compared with patients' actual preferences, are consistent with psychotherapists' own preferences (as patients) and may reflect a false consensus bias. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20910,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"486-494"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145024170","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Psychotherapy
全部 Geobiology Appl. Clay Sci. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta J. Hydrol. Org. Geochem. Carbon Balance Manage. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. Int. J. Biometeorol. IZV-PHYS SOLID EART+ J. Atmos. Chem. Acta Oceanolog. Sin. Acta Geophys. ACTA GEOL POL ACTA PETROL SIN ACTA GEOL SIN-ENGL AAPG Bull. Acta Geochimica Adv. Atmos. Sci. Adv. Meteorol. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. Am. J. Sci. Am. Mineral. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. Appl. Geochem. Aquat. Geochem. Ann. Glaciol. Archaeol. Anthropol. Sci. ARCHAEOMETRY ARCT ANTARCT ALP RES Asia-Pac. J. Atmos. Sci. ATMOSPHERE-BASEL Atmos. Res. Aust. J. Earth Sci. Atmos. Chem. Phys. Atmos. Meas. Tech. Basin Res. Big Earth Data BIOGEOSCIENCES Geostand. Geoanal. Res. GEOLOGY Geosci. J. Geochem. J. Geochem. Trans. Geosci. Front. Geol. Ore Deposits Global Biogeochem. Cycles Gondwana Res. Geochem. Int. Geol. J. Geophys. Prospect. Geosci. Model Dev. GEOL BELG GROUNDWATER Hydrogeol. J. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Hydrol. Processes Int. J. Climatol. Int. J. Earth Sci. Int. Geol. Rev. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. Int. J. Geomech. Int. J. Geog. Inf. Sci. Isl. Arc J. Afr. Earth. Sci. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst. J APPL METEOROL CLIM J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol. J. Atmos. Sol. Terr. Phys. J. Clim. J. Earth Sci. J. Earth Syst. Sci. J. Environ. Eng. Geophys. J. Geog. Sci. Mineral. Mag. Miner. Deposita Mon. Weather Rev. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. Nat. Clim. Change Nat. Geosci. Ocean Dyn. Ocean and Coastal Research npj Clim. Atmos. Sci. Ocean Modell. Ocean Sci. Ore Geol. Rev. OCEAN SCI J Paleontol. J. PALAEOGEOGR PALAEOCL PERIOD MINERAL PETROLOGY+ Phys. Chem. Miner. Polar Sci. Prog. Oceanogr. Quat. Sci. Rev. Q. J. Eng. Geol. Hydrogeol. RADIOCARBON Pure Appl. Geophys. Resour. Geol. Rev. Geophys. Sediment. Geol.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1